Crypto World
Bitcoin needs $1 trillion for Its next bull run
In 2011, $2.7 billion of inflows sent Bitcoin up more than 55,000%. This cycle, $697 billion produced 689%. A leading analyst says the math has changed so much that the next parabolic run needs a trillion dollars. Here is the case, and the case against.
Summary
- CryptoQuant chief executive Ki Young Ju argued on July 1 that Bitcoin’s capital efficiency is collapsing, so each cycle needs far more money to produce far smaller percentage gains.
- His headline figures: in 2011, roughly $2.7 billion of net inflows drove a gain of more than 55,000%, while this cycle, about $697 billion produced a return of around 689%.
- Ju still expects one more parabolic run, but says it likely requires Bitcoin to absorb more than $1 trillion in realized capitalization and to become a core macro asset rather than a retail-driven ETF trade.
- The bull reading is that declining capital efficiency is normal maturation, and that gold’s roughly $27 trillion market value shows enormous headroom for institutional adoption that is still early.
- The bear reading is that a trillion-dollar requirement is an enormous ask in a market bleeding ETF flows to stocks and gold, and that collapsing efficiency signals the era of outsized returns is ending.
Bitcoin just posted the worst month in the history of its exchange-traded funds, bounced modestly into July, and is trading more than 50% below its October 2025 record. Into that gloom, one of the most-watched analysts in crypto dropped a statistic that reframes the entire debate about where Bitcoin goes next.
On July 1, CryptoQuant chief executive Ki Young Ju laid out the numbers behind a claim that is now spreading fast: Bitcoin’s next parabolic bull run may require it to absorb more than $1 trillion of fresh capital. That is not a price target; it is a statement about how much harder it now is to move Bitcoin at all.
This piece breaks down the number behind the claim, what Ju is really arguing, and the serious case on both sides of whether a trillion-dollar bull run is a bullish invitation or a bearish warning.
The number behind the claim
The heart of Ju’s argument is a single, striking comparison of how much money it has taken to move Bitcoin across cycles. In 2011, in Bitcoin’s earliest days, roughly $2.7 billion of net capital inflows drove a price increase of more than 55,000%. In the current cycle, by contrast, about $697 billion of inflows produced a return of only around 689%.
Put those side by side, and the ratio of dollars in to price gain has compressed by something on the order of 80x across the life of the asset. Each successive cycle has demanded far more capital to generate far smaller percentage moves.
The metric underneath this is realized capitalization, which measures the total capital actually invested in Bitcoin by valuing every coin at the price it last moved on-chain, instead of at today’s market price.
Realized cap is the closest thing Bitcoin has to a measure of real money committed to it, and Ju frames the whole question in those terms: the next parabolic run, he argues, likely requires Bitcoin to absorb more than $1 trillion of new realized cap. That is the concrete threshold behind the headline, and it is why the claim is about capital absorbed, not about a price level reached.
This is not a doom call from a permabear. Ju has spent much of the past year as one of the more constructive voices among top analysts, and his July 1 post explicitly says Bitcoin likely has another parabolic cycle ahead of it. The trillion-dollar figure is his estimate of the price of admission for that run, not a declaration that it cannot happen.
Understanding that distinction is essential, because the same numbers can be read as a reason for optimism or a reason for caution, and the rest of the debate flows from which reading you find more convincing.
What Ki Young Ju is actually arguing
Ju’s full thesis is more nuanced than the headline stat suggests, and it rests on a claim about what kind of asset Bitcoin needs to become. In his telling, the shrinking capital efficiency is a symptom of Bitcoin outgrowing its old drivers. The retail-led, exchange-traded-fund-driven demand that has powered recent moves is, he argues, not enough to fuel another parabolic run at Bitcoin’s current size.
For that, Bitcoin needs to graduate into a core macro asset held by institutions and allocators as a serious portfolio holding, not traded as a speculative vehicle by retail investors chasing momentum.
That shift, Ju stresses, is still in its early stages and has not been invalidated by the current downturn. He points to the gap that still exists between Bitcoin and the assets it aspires to sit alongside: gold carries a market value of roughly $27 trillion, dwarfing Bitcoin’s, which leaves enormous room for growth if institutional and macro capital genuinely rotates in.
If Bitcoin can absorb more than $1 trillion in realized cap, he argues, another parabolic bull run remains firmly on the table. The trillion dollars, in this framing, is not an impossible barrier but the scale of adoption required to prove Bitcoin has become what its supporters say it is.
So the argument is really two claims bundled together. The first is descriptive: capital efficiency is declining, and it now takes vastly more money to move Bitcoin than it once did. The second is conditional and hopeful: if the right kind of capital, deep institutional and macro allocation, shows up at sufficient scale, the next parabolic run can still happen. The disagreement in the market is not mostly about the first claim, which the numbers support, but about the second, about whether that $1 trillion is realistically coming, and about what it means for Bitcoin if it does or does not.
Why the math changes as Bitcoin grows
To weigh the claim, it helps to understand why capital efficiency declines in the first place, because the mechanism is not mysterious. It is a straightforward consequence of Bitcoin getting bigger. When Bitcoin was a tiny, obscure asset in 2011, a small amount of new money represented an enormous percentage of its total value, so modest inflows produced explosive percentage gains.
As the asset has grown into the hundreds of billions and, at its peak, past $2 trillion in market value, the same percentage move requires vastly more absolute capital. Moving a large asset by a given percentage simply costs more than moving a small one.
A second force compounds this: the pool of holders willing to sell cheaply keeps shrinking. Over time, a growing share of Bitcoin has moved into the hands of long-term holders and institutions who are not eager to part with their coins at low prices, which Ju and others have described as a structural change in the market. That is usually framed as bullish, because it reduces available supply, but it also changes the market’s rhythm.
With fewer coins available to absorb and fewer sellers to flush out, price action becomes less about violent boom-and-bust cycles and more about how much new capital can be coaxed in against a supply that increasingly sits still.
The result is a maturing asset whose returns compress even as its stability grows. This is the same pattern seen in other assets as they scale: the earliest investors capture the largest percentage gains, and returns moderate as the asset becomes mature and widely held.
For Bitcoin, that means the days when a few billion dollars could produce a 50,000% move are almost certainly gone for good. What replaces them, and whether it is still attractive, is exactly where the bull and bear cases diverge.
The bull case: maturation with huge headroom
The optimistic reading takes the collapsing capital efficiency as a sign of health, not decline. In this view, declining percentage returns are simply what happens when an asset succeeds and grows up, and they say nothing bad about the absolute gains still available. A move that is small in percentage terms for a multi-trillion-dollar asset can still represent enormous absolute wealth creation, and a maturing Bitcoin that trades with less violence is more, not less, attractive to the large, cautious pools of capital that were always going to be needed for the next leg higher.
The headroom argument is the bull’s strongest card. Gold’s market value sits around $27 trillion, and Bitcoin, even near its peak, was a fraction of that. If Bitcoin is genuinely on a path to becoming a macro store of value alongside gold, the total addressable market is measured in tens of trillions, which makes $1 trillion of fresh absorption ambitious but far from absurd.
The infrastructure to deliver it is also further along than ever: spot ETFs, whatever their recent outflows, opened a regulated on-ramp for institutions, corporate treasuries have accumulated well over 1 million coins, and traditional banks have built custody and trading services. The pipes for institutional capital exist in a way they never did in prior cycles.
Ju himself sits largely in this camp, and that matters. His argument is not that the parabolic era is over but that it now depends on a specific, identifiable driver: deeper institutional allocation and macro-asset status, a shift he insists is early instead of dead. Supporters point out that institutional adoption of a new asset class takes years, that sovereign and pension-scale allocation to Bitcoin has barely begun, and that even a small reallocation from the vast pools of global bonds, equities, and gold would supply the $1 trillion in question. In the bull case, the trillion-dollar requirement is not a wall but a roadmap, and the recent weakness is a pause in a still-early adoption story.
The bear case: the outsized-returns era may be ending
The skeptical reading takes the same numbers and draws a colder conclusion. If it now takes $1 trillion to spark a parabolic run, then the era of Bitcoin as a life-changing, asymmetric bet is largely behind us, and what remains is a large, slow, increasingly conventional asset.
Collapsing capital efficiency, in this view, is not just maturation to be celebrated; it is a warning that the returns which drew a generation of investors are compressing toward those of ordinary macro assets, and that buyers expecting another 50-fold move are anchored to a past that will not repeat.
More pressing is the question of where $1 trillion actually comes from, and the short-term evidence is discouraging. Bitcoin ETFs just recorded their worst month on record, shedding around $4.5 billion in June, the opposite of the institutional inflow the thesis requires. Capital has been rotating out of crypto and into artificial-intelligence equities and gold, the “stocks and shiny rocks” Ju himself has described, instead of into Bitcoin.
If the marginal dollar is leaving for other assets precisely when the thesis needs it to arrive at scale, the trillion-dollar bar looks less like a roadmap and more like a distant hope. Demanding record institutional inflows from a market that is currently seeing record outflows is a hard sell.
The bear case also leans on Bitcoin’s present behavior. For the thesis to work, Bitcoin has to become a core macro asset, yet through 2026 it has traded like a high-beta risk asset, falling with technology stocks and failing to act as the hedge the macro-asset story requires. The institutional demand that did show up, much of it channeled through corporate treasuries such as Strategy, now looks strained, with those vehicles under financial pressure and at risk of becoming sellers rather than buyers.
If the treasury model wobbles and ETF flows stay negative, two of the main pipes for the needed capital narrow at once. In the bearish reading, the trillion-dollar requirement is really an admission that Bitcoin can no longer move on its own and now depends on an institutional wave that may not come.
The boredom risk Ju keeps flagging
There is a third scenario that Ju has emphasized repeatedly, and it is neither the bull’s parabolic run nor the bear’s crash. It is stagnation. For much of 2026, he has argued that Bitcoin’s biggest danger is not a violent drawdown but prolonged, boring sideways action that slowly drains attention and conviction.
A sharp crash, in his framing, can be survived because the long-term thesis stays intact and the sell-off flushes out leverage. A market that simply drifts for years is harder to escape, because it offers no catalyst to force capital back in and quietly erodes the belief and the financing structures built on top of the asset.
This connects directly to the capital-efficiency argument. Ju has pointed out that Bitcoin’s realized capitalization, the measure of real money committed, has flatlined after years of growth, and that holders recently entered a net realized loss phase for the first time since 2023. When realized cap stops growing while the market drifts, it means no new buyers are stepping in to absorb sell-side pressure, which is precisely the condition that produces a long, flat grind. The $1 trillion is what would break that stalemate; its absence is what leaves Bitcoin drifting.
The boredom scenario is important because it reframes the stakes. The debate is often posed as bull versus bear, moon versus crash, but Ju’s more subtle point is that the most likely near-term outcome may be neither. It may be a market that neither rewards the bulls with a parabolic run nor vindicates the bears with a collapse, but simply goes quiet, testing the patience of holders and the durability of the institutions built around Bitcoin. In that world, the trillion-dollar question is not answered so much as postponed, and the danger is that the postponement itself does damage.
What would it actually take to get $1 trillion?
If $1 trillion is the price of the next parabolic run, the practical question is where it could plausibly come from, and the honest answer is that it requires sources larger than the ones that have driven Bitcoin so far. Retail speculation and even the current wave of ETF demand are not enough at Bitcoin’s scale, which is Ju’s whole point.
The capital would have to come from the deep pools that have barely allocated to Bitcoin: pension funds, insurers, sovereign wealth funds, corporate treasuries at scale, and potentially nation-states holding Bitcoin as a reserve asset. A modest reallocation from the tens of trillions in global bonds, equities, and gold would clear the bar, but only if Bitcoin earns a place in those mandates.
The conditions for that are identifiable, even if their timing is not. It would likely take continued regulatory clarity that makes Bitcoin allocatable for conservative institutions, a track record of Bitcoin behaving more like a macro store of value than a risk asset, and infrastructure that large allocators trust.
It would also, realistically, require a friendlier macro backdrop than the current one of tight liquidity and a hawkish Federal Reserve, since large institutional rotation into a volatile asset tends to happen when conditions ease instead of tightening. Each of these is plausible over a multi-year horizon and absent in the current one, which is why the thesis is framed as early instead of imminent.
For anyone watching Bitcoin, the signals to track therefore shift away from the daily price and toward the flow of real capital. The single best gauge is realized capitalization itself: if it resumes sustained growth, fresh money is truly entering, and the trillion-dollar path is opening.
Alongside it, the direction of ETF flows, evidence of pension and sovereign allocation, and whether Bitcoin starts trading with more independence from technology stocks would all indicate whether the macro-asset shift is happening. Until those turn, the trillion-dollar requirement remains a thesis about the future instead of a description of the present.
Why this matters even if you disagree
Whatever one makes of the specific trillion-dollar figure, the framing itself is the most valuable takeaway, because it changes how to judge Bitcoin. For most of its history, Bitcoin has been evaluated by its capacity for explosive percentage gains, the asymmetric moonshot that could multiply an investment many times over.
Ju’s argument, accepted even in part, means that lens is increasingly obsolete. A multi-trillion-dollar asset will not deliver another 50,000% move, and holding out for one is a category error. The relevant question becomes whether Bitcoin can keep attracting large absolute inflows as it matures, not whether it can repeat the returns of its infancy.
That reframing cuts across the bull-bear divide. A bull who accepts it stops expecting overnight riches and starts thinking in terms of steady, large-scale adoption compounding over years, judging progress by realized cap and institutional flows instead of by the next candle. A bear who accepts it stops waiting for a total collapse and starts asking whether Bitcoin can justify its size without the returns that once did the persuading. Both are better served by measuring Bitcoin against the trillion-dollar yardstick of real capital than by the percentage fireworks of the past.
The deeper significance is that Bitcoin appears to be at a genuine inflection point in what it is. The collapsing capital efficiency is the numerical fingerprint of an asset transitioning from a speculative frontier bet into something that either becomes a mature macro store of value or stalls short of it.
Ju’s trillion-dollar claim is really a way of stating the price of that transition. Whether Bitcoin pays it, over what timeframe, and whether the market has the patience to wait, are the questions that will define the coming years far more than any single month of inflows or outflows.
Frequently Asked Questions
Who said Bitcoin needs $1 trillion for its next bull run?
The claim comes from Ki Young Ju, chief executive of the on-chain analytics firm CryptoQuant, in a post on July 1, 2026. He argued that Bitcoin’s capital efficiency is declining and that the next parabolic bull run likely requires Bitcoin to absorb more than $1 trillion in realized capitalization, along with deeper institutional adoption. He still expects another parabolic cycle, but sees this as its price of admission.
What does declining capital efficiency mean?
It means it now takes far more money to move Bitcoin’s price by a given percentage than it used to. Ju’s figures show that in 2011, about $2.7 billion of inflows drove a gain of more than 55,000%, while this cycle roughly $697 billion produced around 689%. The ratio of dollars in to price gain has compressed by roughly 80 times, because Bitcoin is now a much larger asset.
Why does it take more money to move Bitcoin now?
Because Bitcoin has grown enormously. When it was tiny, a small inflow was a large share of its value and produced explosive percentage gains. Now that it is worth hundreds of billions to trillions, the same percentage move requires vastly more absolute capital. A shrinking pool of holders willing to sell cheaply, as coins move to long-term holders and institutions, compounds the effect.
Is the $1 trillion claim bullish or bearish?
It can be read either way, which is why it is debated. The bullish reading is that declining percentage returns are normal maturation, and that gold’s roughly $27 trillion market value shows huge headroom for institutional adoption that is still early. The bearish reading is that a trillion-dollar requirement is an enormous ask while ETFs bleed money and capital rotates to stocks and gold, signaling the outsized-returns era is ending.
What is realized capitalization?
Realized capitalization measures the total capital actually invested in Bitcoin by valuing every coin at the price it last moved on-chain, instead of at the current market price. It is the closest measure of real money committed to Bitcoin. Ju frames his argument in these terms: the next parabolic run requires more than $1 trillion of new realized cap to be absorbed, and a flatlining realized cap signals no fresh money is entering.
Where would $1 trillion of new capital come from?
It would have to come from pools far larger than the retail and current ETF demand that has driven Bitcoin so far, such as pension funds, insurers, sovereign wealth funds, large corporate treasuries, and potentially nation-states holding Bitcoin as a reserve. A small reallocation from the tens of trillions in global bonds, equities, and gold would suffice, but only if Bitcoin earns a place in those mandates, which requires clarity, trust, and time.
Does this mean Bitcoin cannot have another bull run?
No. Ju explicitly expects another parabolic run and calls the institutional shift early rather than invalidated. The claim is about what that run requires, not whether it can happen. The debate is over whether the needed $1 trillion will realistically arrive, especially given recent record ETF outflows, and over what it means for returns if future cycles need ever-larger inflows to produce ever-smaller percentage gains.
What should investors watch to judge the thesis?
The single best gauge is realized capitalization: sustained growth means fresh money is truly entering and the trillion-dollar path is opening, while a flatlining figure signals stagnation. Alongside it, watch the direction of ETF flows, evidence of pension and sovereign allocation, and whether Bitcoin begins trading more independently of technology stocks. These signals indicate whether the shift to a core macro asset is actually happening.
Disclaimer: This article is for information and educational purposes only and does not constitute financial, investment, or trading advice. It describes an analyst’s thesis and the debate around it, not a forecast or recommendation, and cryptocurrency prices are highly volatile. Nothing here is a recommendation to buy or sell any asset. Always do your own research and consider consulting a qualified financial professional before making investment decisions. Information is accurate as of July 2, 2026, and may change.
Crypto World
Bitcoin Stays Near $61K as US Jobs Data Lands; AI Weakness Raises BTC Bottom Question
Bitcoin pushed back above $61,000 after a weaker-than-expected US labor report revived expectations that the Federal Reserve may stay flexible on rates. The selloff in US tech—particularly Nasdaq-linked exposure—also helped traders frame Thursday’s move as a potential rotation away from crowded risk assets and toward traditionally scarce stores of value such as Bitcoin and gold.
According to Yahoo Finance, US non-farm payrolls rose by 57,000 in June, missing the 113,000 expected figure. The Labor Department also revised April and May totals downward by a combined 74,000 jobs, adding to the pressure on rate-hike assumptions ahead of September.
Key takeaways
- Disappointing June jobs data reduced near-term rate-hike odds, supporting Bitcoin’s rebound after a dip toward $57,750.
- CME FedWatch moved to 54% odds of rate hikes by September, down from 64% the prior day, highlighting a shift in expectations.
- Gold strengthened alongside Bitcoin, reinforcing the “scarce assets” narrative as investors priced a potentially less tight policy path.
- Onchain indicators cited by CryptoQuant author gaah_im suggest seller exhaustion and a profit-to-loss ratio at levels not seen since 2022.
Jobs data shifts rate expectations and markets follow
The immediate catalyst for crypto’s bounce was the labor market surprise. With non-farm payroll growth coming in well below consensus—and previous months revised lower—traders recalibrated how much economic strength the Fed could rely on to justify additional tightening.
That recalibration showed up in the probability market. CME data via its FedWatch Tool indicated the odds of a rate hike by September fell to 54% from 64% the day before. In practice, that means traders were less convinced the Fed would need to move rates higher despite inflation-related concerns.
At the same time, risk assets that depend on steady growth and low discount rates came under pressure. The Nasdaq 100 erased gains that had built over the prior three sessions, offering a clear macro-throughline: weaker labor prints can compress the appetite for high-multiple equities, while increasing interest in assets perceived to benefit from looser or more supportive liquidity conditions.
Gold steadies as oil slips, reinforcing “liquidity” expectations
Gold prices responded positively on Thursday, which traders often read as a signal that investors are increasingly preparing for a less restrictive policy stance. The article’s framing also connects this to the behavior of crude oil. WTI crude stabilized below $70, while the broader complex had been affected by geopolitical developments.
Oil fell after the Qatar Foreign Ministry said there was “positive progress” in the latest round of discussions between US and Iranian representatives. The move matters less for its headline and more for what it implies for inflation pressure: if energy costs ease, markets may feel less compelled to price aggressive tightening.
In the context of the Fed, attention also turned back to its balance sheet. The Federal Reserve balance sheet was described as stagnating at $6.73 trillion, although the Fed’s mandate allows for $40 billion monthly purchases in short-term Treasuries and bonds. The combination of softer labor data and reduced inflation pressure is commonly interpreted as the backdrop for accelerated liquidity injection—a dynamic that can lower yields and improve conditions for investment flows into assets with limited supply.
AI weakness and “rotation” talk put Bitcoin back in focus
Beyond macro, there was also sector-specific pressure. Traders pointed to weakness in the AI complex—particularly chip-related names—as evidence that capital may be looking for alternatives. Shares of SanDisk, Seagate, Western Digital, and Applied Materials reportedly fell intraday by 9% or more on Thursday.
That disparity between AI-heavy equity exposure and Bitcoin’s price action fed the rotation narrative. While Bitcoin had recently been rejected around $82,500, the rebound followed a broader risk re-pricing after the jobs report. The article notes Bitcoin had been distancing itself from Wednesday’s $57,750 low, suggesting that the market’s downside momentum was losing steam.
If AI-linked selling persists, the logic is straightforward: portfolio managers and traders who reduce high-beta exposures may seek other avenues for returns and hedging—especially those assets that benefit when liquidity expectations improve. In that scenario, the same investors watching Nasdaq futures also become natural readers of Bitcoin’s onchain and macro sensitivity.
Onchain signals: seller exhaustion and a 2022-style profit/loss reset
CryptoQuant author and onchain analyst gaah_im highlighted a set of metrics intended to measure where the market stands in its cycle. In a post referenced in the article, the analyst said Bitcoin’s realized profit-to-loss ratio has reached its lowest level since 2022. The “net percentage of supply in profit” also reportedly turned negative—an outcome gaah_im said historically marks cycle bottoms with “extreme precision.”
For investors, this is the part of the story that matters most if you’re looking beyond the next headline. Onchain indicators can’t guarantee timing, but they can help frame whether the selling pressure that often drives drawdowns has already run its course. A negative shift in profit distribution implies more holders are effectively under water, reducing the likelihood that the market is still populated by large, confident profit-takers poised to dump into strength.
The article also links part of Bitcoin’s recent weakness to disappointment around Strategy (commonly discussed in the market context of its Bitcoin-related capital strategy). Even though the piece describes holders as facing dilution tied to accelerated MSTR share issuance used to buy back some debt and cover dividends on preferred stocks, the takeaway for market observers is that supply dynamics and capital flows around major corporate players can influence short-term volatility.
Finally, the combination of weaker labor data, easier expectations for policy over the coming months, and onchain readings suggesting seller exhaustion is why a near-term rebound toward $70,000 is being discussed. The upside case here is not just “macro improves,” but that the market may already be close enough to a capitulation-like condition that further stabilization in rates and liquidity could quickly translate into renewed demand.
What to watch next is whether labor-market weakness continues to dominate rate expectations—or whether investors start to re-price the Fed back toward a more hawkish stance. Onchain metrics may point to exhaustion, but the market will likely decide the pace of any recovery based on incoming macro data, the path of oil and inflation expectations, and whether AI-linked weakness broadens into sustained rotation rather than a one-day drawdown.
Crypto World
What is Ripple Prime? Inside Ripple’s Prime broker
Ripple spent $1.25 billion to buy a prime broker that clears trillions of dollars a year, then wired it into the XRP Ledger and RLUSD. Here is what a prime broker actually does, what Ripple Prime offers, and whether any of it reaches XRP.
Summary
- Ripple Prime is Ripple’s institutional prime brokerage arm, built from its $1.25 billion acquisition of Hidden Road, offering clearing, financing, and trading across digital assets, foreign exchange, derivatives, swaps, and fixed income.
- A prime broker is the plumbing behind professional trading: it gives hedge funds and trading firms one account for execution, clearing, settlement, financing, and custody, with cross-margining that improves capital efficiency.
- The acquisition made Ripple the first crypto company to own and operate a global, multi-asset prime broker, and the business has grown roughly threefold since the deal was announced.
- Ripple has wired its own products into the platform: RLUSD is used as collateral, some derivatives clients hold balances in it, and Ripple plans to move post-trade activity onto the XRP Ledger.
- For XRP the token, the benefit is indirect and unproven, because Ripple Prime is institutional infrastructure, not a retail venue, and the token has not tracked the platform’s growth.
Ripple Prime is Ripple’s institutional prime brokerage platform, a one-stop service that lets large trading firms clear, finance, and trade across both traditional and digital assets through a single account. It exists because in 2025 Ripple paid $1.25 billion to acquire Hidden Road, one of the largest non-bank prime brokers in the world, and rebranded it. That deal turned Ripple from a payments and stablecoin company into an operator of the kind of core market infrastructure that hedge funds and banks have relied on for decades. This explainer covers what a prime broker is, how Ripple Prime works, how Ripple has connected it to RLUSD and the XRP Ledger, and the honest answer to the question every XRP holder asks: does it help the token?
First, what is a prime broker?
Before Ripple Prime makes sense, the underlying concept has to. A prime broker is a firm that sits behind professional trading operations and bundles together the services those operations need to function. In traditional finance, a hedge fund does not open a separate relationship with every exchange, lender, and custodian it uses. Instead it routes much of that activity through a prime broker, which provides trade execution and access to markets, clearing and settlement of those trades, financing and securities lending so the fund can use leverage, and custody of the assets. The prime broker becomes the single hub through which capital and positions flow.
The reason this matters is capital efficiency. A prime broker can look at all of a client’s positions together and net them, so the client posts collateral against the combined risk of the book instead of against each trade in isolation. This is called cross-margining, and it frees up capital that would otherwise sit idle backing individual positions. A fund running many strategies at once can therefore do more with the same balance sheet. Prime brokers also extend credit, letting clients borrow to amplify positions, and manage the risk of that credit in real time.
In short, prime brokers are the professional-grade infrastructure that makes large-scale, multi-strategy trading possible. They bring credibility, credit, and operational scale, the things institutions expect from legacy finance. For years, crypto largely lacked a prime broker of this caliber, which was one reason big institutions hesitated to trade digital assets at scale. Filling that gap is exactly what Ripple set out to do.
From Hidden Road to Ripple Prime: the $1.25 billion deal
Ripple did not build a prime broker from scratch. It bought one. In April 2025, at Paris Blockchain Week, Ripple announced an agreement to acquire Hidden Road for $1.25 billion, one of the largest deals the digital-asset industry had seen. Hidden Road was a fast-growing non-bank prime broker that cleared roughly $3 trillion a year across markets and served more than 300 institutional clients, including hedge funds, proprietary trading firms, and major liquidity providers. Ripple had been an investor in Hidden Road and a customer of its platform, so it knew the business from the inside before buying it.
The acquisition closed in October 2025, and Hidden Road was immediately rebranded as Ripple Prime. The move made Ripple the first crypto company to own and operate a global, multi-asset prime broker, giving it a financing and clearing engine of a type that had previously belonged only to traditional financial firms. Ripple committed to inject significant capital into the business to expand its capacity, and by its own account the platform grew roughly threefold in activity between the announcement and the close. Hidden Road founder Marc Asch stayed on to work alongside Ripple leadership through the integration.
The strategic logic was that core infrastructure is what unlocks the next phase of institutional crypto adoption. Payments and custody move value and store it, but a prime broker is where institutions actually trade and finance positions at scale. By owning one, Ripple positioned itself to sit at the center of institutional digital-asset activity instead of at the edges, and to bring its own assets, XRP and the RLUSD stablecoin, into that flow.
What Ripple Prime actually does
Ripple Prime offers the full prime-brokerage stack across an unusually broad range of markets. Its services span clearing, prime brokerage, and financing across foreign exchange, digital assets, precious metals, exchange-traded derivatives, over-the-counter swaps, and fixed income repo. Clients can access markets through over-the-counter desks, sponsored access, and direct market access, with real-time risk management, cross-margining across their positions, and risk-based margin financing. That breadth is the point: an institution can manage exposures across traditional and digital assets from one platform instead of stitching together many providers.
In November 2025, shortly after the deal closed, Ripple launched digital-asset spot prime brokerage for the United States market under the Ripple Prime brand. This let US-based institutional clients execute over-the-counter spot transactions across dozens of major digital assets, including XRP and RLUSD, and cross-margin those spot positions alongside swaps and exchange-listed futures and options. It combined Ripple’s regulatory licenses with Hidden Road’s prime-brokerage infrastructure into a single US offering, complementing the derivatives services the platform already ran.
The platform has kept adding connectivity. Ripple Prime enabled support for Hyperliquid, a high-performance decentralized derivatives protocol, letting institutional clients reach on-chain derivatives liquidity while cross-margining their decentralized-finance exposure against all other asset classes on the platform. That combination, a regulated institutional prime broker reaching directly into on-chain markets, is a concrete example of the bridge between traditional finance and decentralized finance that Ripple describes as its goal.
RLUSD as collateral: the cross-margining hook
One of the most important features of Ripple Prime is how it uses RLUSD, Ripple’s dollar-backed stablecoin. RLUSD is being used as collateral across a range of prime-brokerage products, and Ripple has positioned it as the first stablecoin to enable efficient cross-margining between digital assets and traditional markets. In practice, an institution can post RLUSD as margin and have it recognized across both its crypto and its traditional exposures, which is exactly the kind of capital efficiency prime brokers exist to provide.
Adoption of this feature has been concrete instead of theoretical. Some derivatives customers have chosen to hold their balances in RLUSD, and Ripple expects that to grow. RLUSD has been approved as margin collateral on the OKX exchange across more than 280 trading pairs, and Ripple Prime clients can trade Bitcoin options on the Bullish exchange using RLUSD as collateral. To support the stablecoin’s institutional credibility, Bank of New York Mellon serves as the primary reserve custodian of RLUSD, a signal aimed squarely at the compliance expectations of large institutions.
The reason this matters is that it gives RLUSD a real institutional job to do. Many stablecoins circulate mostly among crypto traders; RLUSD, through Ripple Prime, is being embedded into the margin and settlement plumbing that professional firms use. That is a more durable form of demand than speculative trading, because it ties the stablecoin to the operational needs of institutions rather than to market sentiment. It is also the clearest way that Ripple Prime strengthens one of Ripple’s own products, as distinct from the broader industry.
The XRP Ledger connection
Ripple has also linked Ripple Prime to the XRP Ledger, the blockchain whose native asset is XRP. The plan Ripple has described is to migrate parts of Hidden Road’s post-trade activity, the clearing and settlement that happens after a trade is agreed, onto the XRP Ledger. The goal is to streamline settlement and lower operational costs, while showcasing the ledger as institutional-grade infrastructure for decentralized finance. If that migration proceeds at scale, real institutional settlement volume would run across the XRP Ledger.
That connection took a further step through traditional clearing infrastructure. Ripple Prime, still listed under the Hidden Road name in the relevant notice, was integrated into the participant directory of the Depository Trust and Clearing Corporation’s National Securities Clearing Corporation, the backbone of US securities clearing. Ripple’s chief technology officer at the time flagged the development as significant, because it connects a crypto-owned prime broker to the same clearing rails that settle Wall Street’s equity trades. Ripple Prime also received an investment-grade rating from Kroll in April 2026, a distinction Ripple says no other crypto-affiliated prime broker holds, which opens the door to conservative institutions such as pension funds, banks, and insurers.
Taken together, these moves position the XRP Ledger and RLUSD as pieces of institutional market infrastructure instead of purely retail crypto assets. The migration of post-trade activity, the DTCC connection, and the investment-grade rating are all steps toward embedding Ripple’s technology into the machinery of regulated finance. Whether that machinery ends up generating meaningful demand for XRP the token is a separate question, and an important one.
Why Ripple Prime matters for crypto
Zooming out, Ripple Prime matters because it imports a missing layer of financial infrastructure into digital assets. Crypto has never lacked exchanges or wallets, but it has lacked a large, credible, multi-asset prime broker of the kind institutions take for granted in traditional markets. By acquiring one that already cleared trillions of dollars a year and serving 300-plus institutional clients, Ripple gave the industry a bridge between the way hedge funds and banks already operate and the way digital assets trade and settle.
For Ripple itself, the deal marked a transformation. The company had been known primarily for cross-border payments and, more recently, for its RLUSD stablecoin and custody services. Ripple Prime added institutional trading and financing to that stack, so Ripple now spans payments, custody, a stablecoin, and a prime broker. That makes it one of the more vertically integrated firms in crypto, able to offer institutions a connected suite instead of a single product. It also gives Ripple multiple ways to weave XRP and RLUSD into institutional workflows.
The broader significance is about legitimacy. Institutional adoption of digital assets has been held back partly by the absence of familiar, trusted infrastructure. A prime broker with an investment-grade rating, a connection to DTCC clearing, and bank-grade custody speaks the language institutions understand. If Ripple Prime succeeds, it lowers a real barrier to large-scale institutional participation in crypto, which is a meaningful development regardless of what happens to any single token’s price.
Does Ripple Prime actually help XRP?
Here is the question that matters most to XRP holders, and it deserves a straight answer instead of a hopeful one. The connection between Ripple Prime and XRP is infrastructure-driven, not retail-facing. Ripple Prime is a service for institutions; it does not change how ordinary users buy or trade XRP, which still happens on exchanges. The potential benefit to XRP is indirect: if institutional settlement volume grows on the XRP Ledger through Ripple Prime, that could raise network usage, and XRP, as the ledger’s native asset used for transaction fees and liquidity, might see more demand over time.
The trouble is that this benefit has not shown up in the token’s price. Over the year following the acquisition, Ripple Prime delivered on its roadmap, earning an investment-grade rating, launching US spot prime brokerage, and integrating RLUSD as collateral, while XRP fell rather than rose. The token dropped sharply even as the platform executed, which underlines a recurring pattern with Ripple news: the company’s commercial progress and the token’s price are only loosely connected. Much of the value Ripple Prime creates accrues to Ripple the company, to RLUSD, and to the institutions using the platform, not automatically to XRP.
That does not mean Ripple Prime is irrelevant to XRP. The post-trade migration to the XRP Ledger, if it reaches scale, is a genuine potential channel of demand, and a maturing institutional ecosystem around the ledger could matter over a long horizon. But the honest framing is that Ripple Prime is a strong development for Ripple and its institutional ambitions, an indirect and unproven one for XRP, and no substitute for the broad demand that actually moves the token. As with most Ripple news, the wise approach is to separate the company’s execution from the token’s price and to watch for real ledger usage rather than announcements.
The risks and open questions for Ripple Prime
For all its promise, Ripple Prime is not a finished story, and a balanced view has to weigh what could go wrong or fail to materialize. The first question is integration. Merging a large prime broker into a crypto company is complex, and the value of the deal depends on combining Hidden Road’s infrastructure and client relationships with Ripple’s licenses, custody, and stablecoin without friction. Integrations of this size take time, and the benefits Ripple describes assume the two businesses knit together smoothly.
Prime brokerage itself carries inherent risks that Ripple now owns. A prime broker extends credit and holds client assets, which means it takes on counterparty and credit risk: if a large client fails or a market move is violent enough, the broker can be exposed. Managing that risk in real time is the core discipline of the business, and it is why prime brokers live or die on their risk engines and capital buffers. The business is also cyclical, tied to trading volumes and market conditions that rise and fall, so revenue is not guaranteed to grow in a straight line.
Competition is intensifying as well. Other crypto-native firms and incumbent traditional players are building or expanding their own institutional prime services, so Ripple Prime has to win and keep clients in a crowded field. Its differentiators, an investment-grade rating, a connection to traditional clearing, and the integration of RLUSD, are meaningful, but competitors will not stand still, and institutions can multi-home across several prime brokers.
The largest open question for XRP holders specifically is execution on the XRP Ledger. Ripple has said it plans to migrate post-trade activity onto the ledger, but plans and delivery are different things. The scale, timing, and real economic impact of that migration remain to be seen, and much of the token-level thesis rests on it actually happening at volume. Until the ledger is carrying meaningful institutional settlement, the connection between Ripple Prime’s growth and XRP demand stays more potential than proven. None of this makes Ripple Prime a weak business; it makes it a young one whose full impact, on Ripple and on XRP, will be judged over years, not announcements.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Ripple Prime in simple terms?
Ripple Prime is Ripple’s institutional prime brokerage platform. It gives large trading firms and institutions a single service for clearing, financing, and trading across digital assets, foreign exchange, derivatives, swaps, and fixed income. It was created when Ripple acquired the prime broker Hidden Road for $1.25 billion in 2025 and rebranded it. It is built for professional institutions, not retail traders.
What is a prime broker?
A prime broker is a firm that bundles the services professional traders need into one relationship: trade execution and market access, clearing and settlement, financing and lending for leverage, and custody. Its key advantage is cross-margining, which lets a client post collateral against the combined risk of all their positions instead of each trade separately, freeing up capital and improving efficiency.
How much did Ripple pay for Hidden Road?
Ripple agreed to acquire Hidden Road for $1.25 billion, announced in April 2025 and closed in October 2025. Hidden Road was a non-bank prime broker that cleared roughly $3 trillion a year across markets and served more than 300 institutional clients. After closing, Ripple rebranded it as Ripple Prime, becoming the first crypto company to own and operate a global, multi-asset prime broker.
How does Ripple Prime use RLUSD?
RLUSD, Ripple’s dollar-backed stablecoin, is used as collateral across Ripple Prime’s products, positioned as the first stablecoin to enable cross-margining between digital assets and traditional markets. Some derivatives clients hold balances in RLUSD, it is approved as margin collateral on OKX across 280-plus pairs, and Ripple Prime clients can trade Bitcoin options on Bullish using RLUSD. Bank of New York Mellon is its primary reserve custodian.
Does Ripple Prime run on the XRP Ledger?
Not entirely, but Ripple plans to migrate parts of the platform’s post-trade activity, its clearing and settlement, onto the XRP Ledger to lower costs and showcase the ledger for institutional use. Ripple Prime has also been integrated into the DTCC’s securities clearing directory and received an investment-grade rating from Kroll, steps that position the ledger and RLUSD within regulated financial infrastructure.
Is Ripple Prime good for the XRP price?
The benefit to XRP is indirect and, so far, unproven. Ripple Prime is institutional infrastructure, not a retail venue, so it does not change how people trade XRP. If settlement volume grows on the XRP Ledger through the platform, XRP demand could rise over time. But XRP fell during the year Ripple Prime executed its roadmap, showing how loosely Ripple’s progress and the token’s price are connected.
How is Ripple Prime different from a crypto exchange?
An exchange is a venue where users, including retail traders, buy and sell assets directly. A prime broker sits behind professional institutions, providing credit, clearing, settlement, custody, and cross-margining across many venues and asset classes. Ripple Prime serves hedge funds, trading firms, and other institutions with portfolio-level financing and risk management, not everyday retail trading. The two operate at different layers of the market.
Why does Ripple Prime matter for crypto?
It imports a missing layer of financial infrastructure into digital assets. Institutions rely on prime brokers in traditional markets, and crypto had lacked a large, credible one. By acquiring Hidden Road, Ripple gave the industry an investment-grade prime broker connected to traditional clearing rails and bank-grade custody, lowering a real barrier to institutional participation and transforming Ripple into a firm spanning payments, custody, a stablecoin, and prime brokerage.
Disclaimer: This article is for information and educational purposes only and does not constitute financial, investment, or trading advice. Details of Ripple Prime’s services and integrations may change over time. Nothing here is a recommendation to buy or sell any asset. Always do your own research and consult a qualified professional before making financial decisions. Information is accurate as of July 2, 2026, and may change.
Crypto World
Trump sparks crypto rally as Iran talks send oil to 125-day low
Bitcoin has climbed while oil has dropped to a 125-day low after progress in U.S.-Iran negotiations and weaker-than-expected U.S. jobs data boosted risk appetite across financial markets.
Summary
- U.S.-Iran talks in Doha showed positive progress, sending oil to a 125-day low as both sides agreed to resume negotiations on July 18.
- Bitcoin gained about 2.5% after easing geopolitical tensions and weaker-than-expected U.S. jobs data reduced Fed rate hike expectations.
- Bitcoin is approaching the key $62,500 resistance, where a long-term descending trendline aligns with the 50% Fibonacci retracement.
According to Pakistan’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs, indirect talks between U.S. and Iranian negotiators concluded in Doha with mediation from Qatar and Pakistan, producing what the ministry described as “positive progress.”
The ministry said both sides agreed to resume negotiations after the funeral of former Iranian supreme leader Ali Khamenei, with July 18 indicated as the target date for the next round.
The diplomatic update followed comments from President Donald Trump, who wrote on Wednesday that the U.S.-Iran talks had been “going well” and that Iran’s denuclearization process was progressing.
As previously reported by crypto.news, Trump’s remarks had already improved investor confidence before the official confirmation from Pakistan.
Oil slides as geopolitical tensions ease
Energy markets reacted quickly after signs that negotiations would continue. West Texas Intermediate crude fell to $67.34 per barrel, while Brent crude declined to $70.39. WTI also slipped below $67.50 for the first time in 125 days, trading beneath the level seen before the U.S. launched strikes against Iran.
The move extended oil’s decline from above $100 in May, with prices breaking through several support areas around $70, $67.50 and now $67. Gasoline prices have also fallen by roughly 70 cents over the past month, adding to expectations that easing geopolitical tensions could continue to weigh on energy markets if negotiations advance further.
Although negotiators have not reached a final agreement, the scheduled July 18 meeting gives markets a window of relative stability to assess diplomatic progress. Analysts cited in the original report cautioned that negotiations remain incomplete, meaning any setback could quickly change investor sentiment.
Bitcoin targets key resistance after jobs data
Crypto markets strengthened alongside the decline in oil prices, with Bitcoin rising about 2.5% over the past 24 hours to trade near $61,542. The rally also gained support after weaker-than-expected U.S. labor market data reduced expectations that the Federal Reserve would deliver another interest rate hike this year.
According to the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, the U.S. economy added 57,000 nonfarm payroll jobs in June, well below economists’ forecast of 115,000. The agency also revised May’s payroll growth lower by 43,000 jobs, ending a three-month period in which employment gains had consistently exceeded expectations. Meanwhile, the unemployment rate came in at 4.2%, slightly below the expected 4.3%, indicating that hiring slowed while the labor market remained relatively resilient.
On the technical side, Bitcoin has climbed about 2.5% over the past 24 hours to trade near $61,542 at press time. As previously reported by crypto.news, Bitcoin is approaching a decisive technical level near $62,500, where a long-standing descending trendline meets the 50% Fibonacci retracement drawn from the June 15 high to the July 1 low.
As per the report, a move above both the trendline and horizontal resistance would break the pattern that has defined the market over the past month, while failure to reclaim that area could leave the recent corrective structure intact as investors continue watching both the July 18 diplomatic talks and incoming U.S. economic data.
Crypto World
Robinhood CEO Backs Real-World Assets Over Memecoin Growth
TLDR
- Robinhood CEO Vlad Tenev said crypto’s future growth depends on real-world assets rather than memecoins.
- Robinhood launched Stock Tokens to let eligible users trade tokenized equities around the clock.
- Tenev said tokens need underlying utility to become productive assets in financial markets.
- Robinhood plans to connect tokenized equities with DeFi lending pools and collateral use.
- Tenev said traditional financial rails will eventually move onchain through tokenization.
Robinhood CEO Vlad Tenev said crypto’s next growth phase depends on real-world assets, not speculative memecoins. His comments followed Robinhood’s launch of Stock Tokens for eligible users. The product expands tokenized equities trading and supports the company’s wider onchain finance strategy.
Robinhood Pushes Tokenized Real-World Assets
Tenev told CNBC that real-world assets will define crypto’s future. He said assets need underlying utility to become productive. He also questioned the value of creating many memecoins.
“The future of crypto is in real-world assets,” Tenev said. He added that tokens without utility lack productive value. Therefore, Robinhood wants tokenized finance tied to existing market assets.
Robinhood launched Stock Tokens on Wednesday for eligible users. The service allows 24/7 trading of tokenized equities. It also supports plans for lending pools and trading collateral.
Bitcoin Weakness Contrasts With Robinhood’s RWA Push
Bitcoin traded at $61,601.41 on Thursday morning. The asset fell 30% year to date as broader crypto markets weakened. Meanwhile, Tenev pointed to real-world assets as a stronger growth driver.
The crypto market has lost about $1 trillion in value this year. However, Robinhood sees tokenization as a bridge between crypto and markets. Tenev said real-world assets can move traditional products onto blockchain rails.
He said Bitcoin would not lose relevance despite current market pressure. Yet he argued crypto’s next phase needs more than major tokens. As a result, real-world assets remain central to Robinhood’s expansion plan.
Ethereum and DeFi Fit Robinhood’s Tokenization Plans
Ethereum also declined this year as major digital assets faced pressure. Still, DeFi remains important to Robinhood’s tokenization roadmap. The company plans to use tokenized shares in lending pools.
Robinhood wants users to deploy tokenized equities as collateral. That plan could connect real-world assets with broader DeFi trading systems. It also shows how tokenized products may support market activity.
The company is also exploring exposure to private companies like OpenAI. This move would extend real-world assets beyond public equities. Tenev said traditional rails will eventually move onchain through tokenization.
Wall Street Adoption Supports the Onchain Shift
Institutional adoption has become a bright area for the crypto industry. Wall Street firms and payments companies now test blockchain systems. Many of those efforts focus on tokenized real-world assets.
Tenev said crypto is becoming infrastructure for financial markets. “Everything that is running on traditional rails will eventually become onchain,” he said. He called tokenization “a freight train that can’t be stopped.”
Robinhood started as a retail stock trading app. However, it now uses tokenized real-world assets to expand its crypto business. Its latest launch strengthens its push into onchain market infrastructure.
Crypto World
Bitcoin Near $65K as Sharplink Buys $16M in ETH
Bitcoin rebounded on Wednesday as attention turned to Federal Reserve commentary on stubborn inflation. The move came alongside a rise in US Treasury yields—an environment that typically makes investors more selective about assets that don’t provide ongoing yield, including cryptocurrencies.
Still, the bounce does not appear to have fully erased underlying caution. Bitcoin recently traded near $61,490 after dipping to a 21-month low of $57,737, while institutional flows into spot Bitcoin ETFs have remained under pressure and analysts continue to debate whether recent weakness marks a durable bottom.
Key takeaways
- Bitcoin climbed after remarks tied to persistent US inflation, but higher bond yields reinforce why “non-yield” assets face ongoing scrutiny.
- Bitcoin bounced from a 21-month low, yet broader sentiment remains in “Extreme Fear” territory based on a fear/greed tracker.
- Spot Bitcoin ETFs have seen large outflows in recent weeks, with June reported as the worst month since launch for net withdrawals.
- On-chain and chart-based signals cited by analysts suggest the market may not have reached a bear-market bottom if price stays below longer-term benchmarks.
- Crypto liquidity and leverage look thinner heading into Q3 after Q2 liquidations, potentially dampening forced-selling cascades but increasing price swing risk.
Fed inflation focus meets a rate backdrop that still pressures crypto
Bitcoin’s recovery followed remarks linked to persistent inflation, reported through coverage of US Federal Reserve Chair Kevin Warsh’s comments. The positive reaction was tempered by the broader macro picture: the US five-year Treasury yield reportedly rose to 4.22%, reflecting investor demand for higher returns on government bonds.
In the same window, oil prices fell—WTI reportedly touched a four-month low—yet market participants still anticipate eventual monetary expansion. The key tension for crypto is that, regardless of how the Fed ultimately handles interest rates or balance-sheet policy, Treasury issuance and yields influence the opportunity cost of holding assets without yield.
BTC rebounds from $57,737 low, but “Extreme Fear” persists
At the time of publication, Bitcoin was trading around $61,490 after earlier trading as low as $57,737 on Wednesday, according to the same market coverage. Ether and Solana also posted gains, with ETH up about 3% and SOL up roughly 4.85%.
However, the rebound took place under an unusually cautious market mood. A fear and greed sentiment tracker cited in the coverage placed the crypto market at roughly 11 out of 100—labeled “Extreme Fear.” That matters because extreme caution can support sharp rallies, but it also suggests many investors remain positioned for downside risk rather than confident recovery.
From a longer perspective, the article noted Bitcoin remains down about a third since the start of the year, and the institutional picture has not improved. Reported flows show US spot Bitcoin ETFs experiencing significant withdrawals, including a total outflow of $4.5 billion in June—described as the largest since the ETFs launched. When institutional allocation confidence lags during a bounce, traders often treat rallies as fragile until inflows return.
PlanB: June weakness and 200-week levels imply the bottom may not be in
Beyond sentiment and ETF flows, at least one widely followed analyst argued the market has more room to fall. PlanB, referenced in the coverage, warned that Bitcoin could drop further after closing June below its 200-week moving average while still trading above its realized price.
The specific setup highlighted is that Bitcoin ended June 20.5% lower to close at $58,526—its worst monthly performance since June 2022. The same coverage placed that close below the 200-week moving average near $62,000, while still above a realized price figure around $52,000.
“All previous bear market bottoms were below realized price,” PlanB said, according to a post attributed to the analyst.
The article further cited PlanB adding that Bitcoin could still decline toward $52,000, framing the current price relationship to those two benchmarks as evidence the bear-market bottom may not yet be confirmed. For traders and portfolio managers, the practical takeaway is that technical “bounce” narratives may remain vulnerable if realized-price confirmation is not reached and ETF outflows continue to weigh on demand.
Sharplink restarts ETH accumulation, while leverage resets change Q3 dynamics
While Bitcoin-focused signals leaned cautious, one notable development in Ethereum accumulation came from Sharplink, a crypto treasury company. The coverage states Sharplink resumed buying Ether after an eight-month pause, and that it purchased $16 million worth of ETH since June 25.
On-chain data from Arkham cited in the report showed Sharplink buying 5,000 ETH on June 25 and another 5,000 ETH on June 26, with the report noting those amounts were worth about $8.5 million per day at the time of the purchases. The company also confirmed the buys in an announcement, saying it paid an average price of $1,611 per ETH.
The same coverage said Sharplink’s latest buys bring its total Ether holdings to 866,725 ETH, and quoted the company’s position that the purchases reflect a continued commitment to growing its ETH treasury as a long-term reserve asset.
Liquidity and positioning are also becoming a key story as markets move into Q3. A market update from institutional data provider Talos, cited in the article, described thinner liquidity but less leverage after Q2. According to Talos, Bitcoin and Ether long liquidations totaled $8.35 billion in Q2—an episode that coincided with spot Bitcoin ETF outflows, reduced Bitcoin buying by Strategy, and a contraction in stablecoin supply.
Talos’ framework suggests the deleveraging may reduce the likelihood of a forced-selling chain reaction heading into Q3. Yet the firm also warned that reduced order-book depth can weaken the market’s ability to absorb renewed selling pressure. In other words: the market may be less fragile in one sense, while simultaneously becoming more prone to sharper swings because there is less trading activity to buffer large orders.
What to watch next as macro pressure and positioning collide
With bond yields still elevated, ETF outflows still shaping institutional demand, and liquidity thinner after Q2’s deleveraging, the next moves in Bitcoin may hinge on whether buying interest returns alongside improved market depth—or whether rallies fade into another test of longer-term technical levels. Investors and traders should watch ETF flow data, Treasury yield direction, and whether stablecoin supply and order-book depth continue to shift as Q3 unfolds.
Crypto World
Why Bitcoin Jumped towards $62,000 and What Could Carry It to $70,000
Bitcoin (BTC) nearly topped $62,000 on Thursday after US payrolls grew by just 57,000 in June, roughly half of what economists expected. The miss revived Federal Reserve rate cut hopes and forced bearish traders to exit crowded short positions.
The rebound arrived days after Bitcoin closed its worst month since June 2022, a 20.5% drop. Whether the bounce extends to $70,000 now hinges on Fed policy, ETF flows, and whale activity on exchanges.
Weak Jobs Data Explains Why Bitcoin Jumped towards $62,000
The Bureau of Labor Statistics counted 57,000 new jobs for June, far below the 113,000 consensus. According to the report, April and May payrolls were also revised down by a combined 74,000, while labor force participation slid from 61.8% to 61.5%.
Consequently, traders cut the odds of further Fed rate hikes and rotated back into risk assets. The data also landed a day after Fed Chair Kevin Warsh said inflation risks had eased, remarks that helped Bitcoin reclaim the $60,000 level on Wednesday.
Derivatives amplified the move. Roughly $450 million in crypto short positions were liquidated within 24 hours, CoinGlass data shows, as bears rushed to cover.
Bitcoin now trades near $61,465, up 1.18% over 24 hours, but even so, BTC sits 51% below its October 2025 record of $126,080 and down 44% over the past year.
ETF Outflows and Whale Deposits Cloud the Road to $70,000
Institutional demand has not confirmed the bounce. Spot Bitcoin ETFs posted $294 million in net outflows on Wednesday, market data shows, even as prices climbed. The redemptions extended June’s record $4.5 billion exit, the products’ worst month on record.
Sentiment is thawing nonetheless. CoinMarketCap’s Fear and Greed Index improved from Extreme Fear to Fear.
Similarly, Tiger Research said it has turned more constructive, arguing the market is likely in the final stage of its bear cycle.
In contrast, however, CryptoQuant flagged fresh warning signs on exchanges.
“Bitcoin is testing $60K support, and exchange deposits are flashing warning signs. BTC inflows jumped above 50K/day, ETH inflows spiked above 1.25M, and altcoin deposits hit a two-month high. Whales appear to be leading the move. Incoming volatility,” the analysts wrote in a post.
The firm added that the average deposit size doubled from 1 BTC to 2 BTC, a pattern driven by whales rather than retail. Its warning follows deepening capitulation signals tracked across on-chain data this week.
Historically, similar deposit spikes preceded sharp moves, including June’s slide when Bitcoin fell to $58,000. A failure to hold $60,000 could expose the realized price near $53,000, which CryptoQuant calls the key on-chain valuation floor.
A sustained push to $70,000 likely requires ETF flows to turn positive and July’s FOMC meeting to validate rate cut bets.
Until then, reclaiming the 20-day EMA remains the first test for bulls, while $60,000 stays the line the whole market is watching.
RSI Rebound Suggests Selling Pressure Is Fading
The daily Relative Strength Index (RSI) has climbed to 43.76, holding above its signal line at 35.59. The indicator bottomed near oversold territory in mid-June, and its recovery suggests bears are losing control.
A push above 50 would confirm the shift, especially if the broader market keeps climbing.
BTC faces a resistance cluster at $62,000, reinforced by the 20-day EMA at $62,148 and Parabolic SAR at $62,523. A daily close above it could send the price toward the 50-day EMA near $66,200, a 7.7% gain.
However, record ETF outflows may cap demand, even as long-term models point higher. Rejection here risks a retest of $58,115, and losing that floor would invalidate the recovery.
The post Why Bitcoin Jumped towards $62,000 and What Could Carry It to $70,000 appeared first on BeInCrypto.
Crypto World
Robinhood wins bigger Wall Street bets as $135 price target emerges
Robinhood shares have climbed more than 6% after multiple Wall Street firms reaffirmed bullish ratings and projected further upside as the brokerage expands its global business and AI offerings.
Summary
- Robinhood shares rose over 6% as Wall Street firms reiterated Buy ratings and projected upside to $135.
- Analysts cited global expansion, AI-powered products, and crypto initiatives as key drivers of future growth.
- Robinhood expanded into Canada, the UK, and Singapore while launching its blockchain and AI trading features.
According to recent research notes from Piper Sandler, BTIG, and Mizuho, confidence in Robinhood’s long-term growth story has strengthened even after the stock’s strong rally. According to Yahoo Finance data, shares briefly traded above $115 after the Wall Street opening bell, extending their monthly gain to about 31% as investors responded to a series of new product launches and international expansion plans.
Piper Sandler maintained its Buy rating and kept a $135 price target on Robinhood, suggesting the stock still has room to appreciate. BTIG also reiterated its Buy recommendation with a $125 target. Meanwhile, Mizuho raised its target price to $130 from $115 while maintaining a Buy rating, making it one of the latest firms to increase expectations for the brokerage.
Global expansion continues to support Robinhood’s growth story
Mizuho’s latest research note argued that Robinhood could become the first true “hyperscaler” among online brokerage platforms. The firm pointed to Robinhood’s base of more than 27 million funded accounts, its easy-to-use trading platform, and its popularity among younger investors as reasons for its positive outlook.
The brokerage also believes Robinhood’s opportunity extends well beyond the United States. According to Mizuho, the company is expected to deepen its presence across Europe before eventually expanding further into Asian markets.
Recent announcements from Robinhood have added support to that outlook. The company said it now serves more than 1 million funded customers in Europe while confirming plans to launch Robinhood Crypto in the UK as part of its regional expansion.
Outside Europe, Robinhood officially introduced its crypto platform in Canada with zero trading fees for the first 90 days. The company also disclosed that it had secured a brokerage license in Singapore, giving it another foothold in the Asian market.
AI products and blockchain strategy attract fresh investor attention
Alongside its international rollout, Robinhood has continued expanding its technology offerings. The company recently introduced Robinhood Chain, a blockchain network designed to support AI-assisted token swaps, liquidity discovery, and access to tokenized real-world assets.
The blockchain launch followed the rollout of Robinhood’s Agentic trading tools, which use artificial intelligence to help users analyze markets and manage investments. According to the company, those AI-native features have gained traction among traders since their introduction.
The combination of blockchain infrastructure, AI-powered products, and expansion into new markets has coincided with stronger optimism from Wall Street analysts. Their latest forecasts suggest these initiatives could open additional revenue streams while helping Robinhood diversify beyond its traditional retail brokerage business.
Even with analysts maintaining bullish targets, short-term trading could still be affected by broader market volatility. For now, however, brokerage firms including Piper Sandler, BTIG, and Mizuho continue to argue that Robinhood’s international expansion, growing crypto business, and investment in AI technology provide a favorable foundation for further growth in the months ahead.
Crypto World
Why Bitwise’s Matt Hougan Thinks Strategy’s Bitcoin Era Is Fading
Michael Saylor’s Strategy has long served as the dominant corporate force behind Bitcoin buying, but that may be changing.
Bitwise Chief Investment Officer Matt Hougan believes that the company will play a much smaller role in driving the crypto asset’s demand in the next market cycle.
Next Wave of BTC Buyers
In his latest market analysis, Hougan said that Strategy’s role in the Bitcoin market has changed after the company adopted a new framework for STRC, which allows it to periodically sell the crypto to fund dividend obligations. While Hougan acknowledged that he does not expect Strategy to become a major BTC seller, he did say that the company could now buy or sell the crypto depending on market conditions rather than acting as a constant source of demand.
He added that there is no mechanism forcing Strategy to sell more than a few billion dollars’ worth of Bitcoin annually, and if the crypto asset’s prices recover, the exec still expects the company to remain a net buyer. Even so, Hougan said Strategy is unlikely to carry the same market influence it did during the previous cycle.
Instead, he expects institutional investors to emerge as the dominant force behind Bitcoin accumulation. Looking at BTC’s history, Hougan said market leadership has repeatedly shifted between different groups of buyers, moving from cypherpunks to Asian investors, then US retail participants, followed by the Grayscale Investments Bitcoin Trust and later Strategy.
The Bitwise CIO now believes the next phase will be led by institutions with significantly larger pools of capital. These include global banks, asset managers, pension funds, endowments, sovereign wealth funds, and financial advisers. According to him, this transition is already underway.
For instance, Morgan Stanley has launched proprietary Bitcoin ETFs, while Wells Fargo has started adding BTC exposure to model portfolios. He also highlighted that Texas became the first US state to fund a strategic BTC reserve, while several sovereign wealth funds and sovereign banks either already hold the crypto asset or have begun evaluating allocations.
Despite Bitcoin ETF outflows during 2026, Hougan noted that the products have attracted more than $50 billion since launching in 2024 and are now available on most major financial adviser platforms.
Strategy Slowdown May Benefit Bitcoin
A slowdown in Strategy’s Bitcoin purchases would not necessarily be bearish for the market, according to HashKey Group’s Senior Researcher Tim Sun. Speaking to CryptoPotato, Sun said that if the company is forced to slow or pause its accumulation, it would help unwind the distortion in supply and demand created by its financing-driven buying model.
Rather than relying heavily on Strategy’s purchases and ETF inflows, Bitcoin would have an opportunity to establish a stronger price floor based on genuine market demand, resulting in what Sun views as a healthier market structure.
The post Why Bitwise’s Matt Hougan Thinks Strategy’s Bitcoin Era Is Fading appeared first on CryptoPotato.
Crypto World
Aave V3 Protocol Deploys on Monad with GHO Stablecoin Integration
Key Highlights
- Aave V3 protocol deploys comprehensive lending infrastructure on Monad Network supporting a dozen digital assets.
- Native GHO stablecoin becomes available on Monad for enhanced borrowing capabilities and liquidity provision.
- $15 million liquidity incentive program launched by Monad Foundation for first-year ecosystem growth.
- Chainlink Smart Value Recapture technology integrated to redirect liquidation proceeds to protocol treasury.
- Strategic deployment positions Monad as emerging DeFi hub with plans for tokenized asset integration.
The decentralized finance landscape has expanded as Aave deployed its V3 lending protocol on the Monad Layer 1 blockchain. This integration delivers comprehensive lending and borrowing capabilities through a dozen supported digital assets while introducing GHO stablecoin functionality to the network. The deployment incorporates Chainlink’s Smart Value Recapture mechanism from the outset.
Comprehensive Lending Platform Arrives on Monad
The Aave V3 deployment on Monad includes support for USDT0, USDC, GHO, USDe, mUSD, AUSD, WETH, and cbBTC at the initial launch phase. Additional assets including wstETH, weETH, syrupUSDC and sUSDe round out the initial offering. This diverse selection provides network participants with extensive options for borrowing activities, yield generation, and collateral deployment immediately upon launch.
This strategic expansion broadens Aave’s presence across multiple blockchain ecosystems while simultaneously reinforcing Monad’s nascent decentralized finance infrastructure. Development teams gain immediate access to battle-tested lending mechanisms. Monad’s compatibility with Ethereum development standards enables seamless deployment of Solidity-based smart contracts with minimal modifications required.
Aave‘s implementation includes Chainlink Smart Value Recapture functionality activated at launch. This innovative feature channels a portion of liquidation-derived value directly back to protocol reserves. Consequently, the deployment delivers both enhanced liquidity infrastructure and sophisticated protocol revenue mechanisms.
Strategic Incentive Program Targets Early Adoption
Monad Foundation has pledged $15 million in incentive allocations during the inaugural year following Aave’s deployment. Additionally, the foundation committed to purchasing and maintaining 10 million GHO tokens for a minimum six-month duration. Aave DAO supplemented this initiative with an additional 500,000 GHO allocation designated for user engagement.
These financial commitments target initial liquidity establishment and stimulate borrowing demand during the critical early phase. Nevertheless, long-term platform viability depends on organic activity levels once incentive programs diminish. Monad requires genuine market participation beyond superficial total value locked metrics.
The Monad mainnet and MON token officially launched on November 24, 2025. By early June, network statistics indicated approximately $359.5 million in aggregate value locked across protocols. LlamaRisk provided assessment support for the Aave deployment while advocating conservative initial parameter settings given Monad’s limited operational track record.
Stablecoin Expansion Aligns with Tokenized Asset Momentum
GHO’s integration on Monad represents another milestone in Aave’s native stablecoin distribution strategy across diverse blockchain networks. The digital currency previously expanded operations to Base and Arbitrum networks following its 2023 introduction. Within the Monad ecosystem, GHO facilitates borrowing mechanisms, liquidity provision, and broader stablecoin utility throughout Aave markets.
This deployment coincides with accelerating interest in tokenized real-world assets within decentralized finance protocols. Centrifuge previously announced intentions to introduce tokenized Treasury securities, private credit instruments, and AAA-rated collateralized loan obligations to Monad. These asset categories could underpin sophisticated lending markets and collateral frameworks as the ecosystem matures.
Standard Chartered projects substantial expansion in decentralized finance asset valuations approaching 2030. The financial institution identified tokenized real-world assets and crypto-native demand as primary growth catalysts. Aave’s presence on Monad establishes a proven infrastructure foundation for anticipated future lending activity.
Crypto World
Michael Saylor highlights MSTR signal that dwarfs Big Tech rivals
Michael Saylor has highlighted that Strategy’s open interest-to-market-cap ratio has climbed to nearly 72%, far exceeding the levels seen across the largest U.S. technology stocks as MSTR rebounds above $100 alongside Bitcoin’s recovery.
Summary
- Michael Saylor says MSTR’s open interest-to-market-cap ratio has reached nearly 72%, far ahead of major U.S. tech stocks.
- MSTR rebounded above $100 as Bitcoin climbed past $62,000, lifting other crypto-related stocks.
- Bitwise and Wall Street remain positive on Bitcoin despite recent Strategy price target cuts from Canaccord and TD Cowen.
According to a July 2 X post by Strategy co-founder Michael Saylor, MSTR currently carries an open interest-to-market-cap ratio of almost 72%, making it the highest among the companies he compared.
Tesla ranked a distant second at 16%, followed by Meta at 11%, Microsoft at 6.1%, Nvidia at 5.8%, Amazon at 4.4%, Alphabet at 4.2%, and Apple at 3.2%. The comparison comes as investors increase activity around the Bitcoin-focused stock after its recent rebound.
Heavy derivatives positioning has outpaced Big Tech peers
Open interest measures the total number of outstanding derivatives contracts tied to a stock. A high open interest-to-market-cap ratio points to unusually large positioning relative to the company’s size, although the metric alone does not indicate whether traders are betting on gains or losses because it includes both long and short positions.
Recent price action has coincided with the elevated derivatives activity. Yahoo Finance data showed MSTR rising to an intraday high of about $104 after reclaiming the psychologically important $100 level. The stock gained more than 10% during the session and has climbed over 23% from its recent low near $82 over the past five trading days. Even after the rebound, however, MSTR remains down more than 37% over the last six months.

The recovery in Strategy shares came as Bitcoin briefly traded above $62,000 after weaker-than-expected U.S. jobs data improved sentiment across risk assets. Other crypto-linked equities, including Coinbase, Robinhood, Marathon Digital, the iShares Bitcoin Trust, and Hut 8, also recorded notable gains during the session.
Wall Street still sees Bitcoin strength despite lower Strategy targets
Bitwise Chief Investment Officer Matt Hougan pointed to Strategy’s valuation as one of the indicators worth monitoring as investors search for signs that Bitcoin may be approaching a market bottom.
In his latest memo, Hougan wrote that MSTR trading at a discount to its net asset value would be one of the few signals to watch while also discussing Strategy’s recently introduced digital credit framework, under which the company could sell up to $1.25 billion worth of Bitcoin.
Hougan argued that institutional investors are likely to overtake Strategy as the largest buyers of Bitcoin over time. At the same time, he maintained that the company is unlikely to become a forced seller because, in his view, no mechanism currently exists that would require it to liquidate large portions of its Bitcoin holdings.
Commenting on the current weakness in Strategy’s securities, Hougan described the decline in MSTR and STRC as part of Bitcoin’s cyclical process rather than an isolated event.
“This is a painful but necessary part of the current crypto market cycle, as it is with all cycles.”
Wall Street analysts have nevertheless become more cautious on Strategy’s stock valuation. As previously reported by crypto.news, Canaccord lowered its price target on the company to $130 from $163, attributing the revision to Strategy’s prolonged share price decline rather than any change in its long-term Bitcoin outlook. The brokerage said its investment thesis for Bitcoin remains intact despite the lower target.
The Canaccord revision followed another recent adjustment by TD Cowen, which cut its Strategy price target to $260 from $400 while maintaining its Buy rating, indicating that although valuation expectations have been reduced, some analysts continue to back the company’s long-term exposure to Bitcoin.
-
Fashion6 days agoWeekend Open Thread: Staud – Corporette.com
-
Politics7 days agoThe House | Manchesterism won’t survive the painful trade-offs unless it gets citizens on board
-
Crypto World3 days agoStrategy authorizes up to $1.25B in Bitcoin sales under new capital plan
-
Politics7 days agoPotential 2028er World Cup attendee leaderboard
-
Business7 days agoAsia stock markets slide as tech shares slump
-
News Videos4 days agoMAJOR BITCOIN & MARKET UPDATE!!!! (MUST WATCH ASAP!!!)
-
Crypto World5 days agoCoinbase, Circle Deepen Crypto Stock Losses Despite Resilient S&P 500
-
Tech3 days agoAnonymous researcher drops 0-day ‘exploitarium’ repo
-
Business3 days agoAustralia treasurer says alleged access of prime minister’s bank data ’incredibly concerning’
-
Crypto World6 days agoKraken's xStocks Opens Bending Spoons IPO Registration to EEA Retail
-
Sports6 days agoFIH Pro League: India defeat Pakistan 7-1, register biggest win of campaign | Other Sports News
-
Crypto World7 days agoBitcoin Sparks $600M Hourly Liquidations With $65,000 Set To Become Resistance
-
Tech5 days agoBluekit phishing kit adopts browser-in-the-middle for login theft
-
Crypto World6 days agoHyperliquid Named on Singapore MAS Investor Alert Register
-
Tech6 days agoRussian hackers now target Signal backup recovery keys
-
Crypto World7 days agoTether (USDT) Passes Ether in Market Cap as ETH Drops Toward $1.5K
-
Crypto World6 days agoRTX holders must register wallets before token distribution begins
-
Sports2 days agoBroncos roster: OL Ben Powers (No. 74) entering final year of contract
-
Business3 days agoThe AI boom won’t burst all at once. It will pop in ‘rolling bubbles’: Macquarie
-
Tech5 days agoClaude Code turned every engineer into three. Now companies need more product thinkers


You must be logged in to post a comment Login