Connect with us
DAPA Banner
DAPA Coin
DAPA
COIN PAYMENT ASSET
PRIVACY · BLOCKDAG · HOMOMORPHIC ENCRYPTION · RUST
ElGamal Encrypted MINE DAPA
🚫 GENESIS SOLD OUT
DAPAPAY COMING

Tech

The only AI glossary you’ll need this year

Published

on

Artificial intelligence is rewriting the world, and simultaneously inventing a whole new language to describe how it’s doing it. Sit in on any product meeting, pitch, or panel these days, and you’ll hear people toss around LLMs, RAG, RLHF, and a dozen other terms that can make even very smart people in the tech world feel a little insecure. This glossary is our attempt to fix that: pain-English definitions of the AI terms you’re most likely to actually run into, whether you’re building with this stuff, investing in it, or just trying to keep up by reading TechCrunch or listening to related podcasts. We update it regularly as the field evolves, so consider it a living document, much like the AI systems it describes.


Artificial general intelligence, or AGI, is a nebulous term. But it generally refers to AI that’s more capable than the average human at many, if not most, tasks. OpenAI CEO Sam Altman once described AGI as the “equivalent of a median human that you could hire as a co-worker.” Meanwhile, OpenAI’s charter defines AGI as “highly autonomous systems that outperform humans at most economically valuable work.” Google DeepMind’s understanding differs slightly from these two definitions; the lab views AGI as “AI that’s at least as capable as humans at most cognitive tasks.” Confused? Not to worry — so are experts at the forefront of AI research.

An AI agent refers to a tool that uses AI technologies to perform a series of tasks on your behalf — beyond what a more basic AI chatbot could do — such as filing expenses, booking tickets or a table at a restaurant, or even writing and maintaining code. However, as we’ve explained before, there are lots of moving pieces in this emergent space, so “AI agent” might mean different things to different people. Infrastructure is also still being built out to deliver on its envisaged capabilities. But the basic concept implies an autonomous system that may draw on multiple AI systems to carry out multistep tasks.

Think of API endpoints as “buttons” on the back of a piece of software that other programs can press to make it do things. Developers use these interfaces to build integrations — for example, allowing one application to pull data from another, or enabling an AI agent to control third-party services directly without a human manually operating each interface. Most smart home devices and connected platforms have these hidden buttons available, even if ordinary users never see or interact with them. As AI agents grow more capable, they are increasingly able to find and use these endpoints on their own, opening up powerful — and sometimes unexpected — possibilities for automation.

Advertisement

Given a simple question, a human brain can answer without even thinking too much about it — things like “which animal is taller, a giraffe or a cat?” But in many cases, you often need a pen and paper to come up with the right answer because there are intermediary steps. For instance, if a farmer has chickens and cows, and together they have 40 heads and 120 legs, you might need to write down a simple equation to come up with the answer (20 chickens and 20 cows).

In an AI context, chain-of-thought reasoning for large language models means breaking down a problem into smaller, intermediate steps to improve the quality of the end result. It usually takes longer to get an answer, but the answer is more likely to be correct, especially in a logic or coding context. Reasoning models are developed from traditional large language models and optimized for chain-of-thought thinking thanks to reinforcement learning.

(See: Large language model)

This is a more specific concept that an “AI agent,” which means a program that can take actions on its own, step by step, to complete a goal. A coding agent is a specialized version applied to software development. Rather than simply suggesting code for a human to review and paste in, a coding agent can write, test, and debug code autonomously, handling the kind of iterative, trial-and-error work that typically consumes a developer’s day. These agents can operate across entire codebases, spotting bugs, running tests, and pushing fixes with minimal human oversight. Think of it like hiring a very fast intern who never sleeps and never loses focus — though, as with any intern, a human still needs to review the work.

Advertisement

Although somewhat of a multivalent term, compute generally refers to the vital computational power that allows AI models to operate. This type of processing fuels the AI industry, giving it the ability to train and deploy its powerful models. The term is often a shorthand for the kinds of hardware that provides the computational power — things like GPUs, CPUs, TPUs, and other forms of infrastructure that form the bedrock of the modern AI industry.

A subset of self-improving machine learning in which AI algorithms are designed with a multi-layered, artificial neural network (ANN) structure. This allows them to make more complex correlations compared to simpler machine learning-based systems, such as linear models or decision trees. The structure of deep learning algorithms draws inspiration from the interconnected pathways of neurons in the human brain.

Deep learning AI models are able to identify important characteristics in data themselves, rather than requiring human engineers to define these features. The structure also supports algorithms that can learn from errors and, through a process of repetition and adjustment, improve their own outputs. However, deep learning systems require a lot of data points to yield good results (millions or more). They also typically take longer to train compared to simpler machine learning algorithms — so development costs tend to be higher.

(See: Neural network)

Advertisement

Diffusion is the tech at the heart of many art-, music-, and text-generating AI models. Inspired by physics, diffusion systems slowly “destroy” the structure of data — for example, photos, songs, and so on — by adding noise until there’s nothing left. In physics, diffusion is spontaneous and irreversible — sugar diffused in coffee can’t be restored to cube form. But diffusion systems in AI aim to learn a sort of “reverse diffusion” process to restore the destroyed data, gaining the ability to recover the data from noise.

Distillation is a technique used to extract knowledge from a large AI model with a ‘teacher-student’ model. Developers send requests to a teacher model and record the outputs. Answers are sometimes compared with a dataset to see how accurate they are. These outputs are then used to train the student model, which is trained to approximate the teacher’s behavior.

Distillation can be used to create a smaller, more efficient model based on a larger model with a minimal distillation loss. This is likely how OpenAI developed GPT-4 Turbo, a faster version of GPT-4.

While all AI companies use distillation internally, it may have also been used by some AI companies to catch up with frontier models. Distillation from a competitor usually violates the terms of service of AI API and chat assistants.

Advertisement

This refers to the further training of an AI model to optimize performance for a more specific task or area than was previously a focal point of its training — typically by feeding in new, specialized (i.e., task-oriented) data. 

Many AI startups are taking large language models as a starting point to build a commercial product but are vying to amp up utility for a target sector or task by supplementing earlier training cycles with fine-tuning based on their own domain-specific knowledge and expertise.

(See: Large language model [LLM])

A GAN, or Generative Adversarial Network, is a type of machine learning framework that underpins some important developments in generative AI when it comes to producing realistic data — including (but not only) deepfake tools. GANs involve the use of a pair of neural networks, one of which draws on its training data to generate an output that is passed to the other model to evaluate.

Advertisement

The two models are essentially programmed to try to outdo each other. The generator is trying to get its output past the discriminator, while the discriminator is working to spot artificially generated data. This structured contest can optimize AI outputs to be more realistic without the need for additional human intervention. Though GANs work best for narrower applications (such as producing realistic photos or videos), rather than general purpose AI.

Hallucination is the AI industry’s preferred term for AI models making stuff up — literally generating information that is incorrect. Obviously, it’s a huge problem for AI quality. 

Hallucinations produce GenAI outputs that can be misleading and could even lead to real-life risks — with potentially dangerous consequences (think of a health query that returns harmful medical advice).

The problem of AIs fabricating information is thought to arise as a consequence of gaps in training data. Hallucinations are contributing to a push toward increasingly specialized and/or vertical AI models — i.e. domain-specific AIs that require narrower expertise — as a way to reduce the likelihood of knowledge gaps and shrink disinformation risks.

Advertisement

Inference is the process of running an AI model. It’s setting a model loose to make predictions or draw conclusions from previously seen data. To be clear, inference can’t happen without training; a model must learn patterns in a set of data before it can effectively extrapolate from this training data.

Many types of hardware can perform inference, ranging from smartphone processors to beefy GPUs to custom-designed AI accelerators. But not all of them can run models equally well. Very large models would take ages to make predictions on, say, a laptop versus a cloud server with high-end AI chips.

[See: Training]

Large language models, or LLMs, are the AI models used by popular AI assistants, such as ChatGPT, Claude, Google’s Gemini, Meta’s AI Llama, Microsoft Copilot, or Mistral’s Le Chat. When you chat with an AI assistant, you interact with a large language model that processes your request directly or with the help of different available tools, such as web browsing or code interpreters.

Advertisement

LLMs are deep neural networks made of billions of numerical parameters (or weights, see below) that learn the relationships between words and phrases and create a representation of language, a sort of multidimensional map of words.

These models are created from encoding the patterns they find in billions of books, articles, and transcripts. When you prompt an LLM, the model generates the most likely pattern that fits the prompt.

(See: Neural network)

Memory cache refers to an important process that boosts inference (which is the process by which AI works to generate a response to a user’s query). In essence, caching is an optimization technique, designed to make inference more efficient. AI is obviously driven by high-octane mathematical calculations and every time those calculations are made, they use up more power. Caching is designed to cut down on the number of calculations a model might have to run by saving particular calculations for future user queries and operations. There are different kinds of memory caching, although one of the more well-known is KV (or key value) caching. KV caching works in transformer-based models, and increases efficiency, driving faster results by reducing the amount of time (and algorithmic labor) it takes to generate answers to user questions.   

Advertisement

(See: Inference)  

Model Context Protocol, or MCP, is an open standard that lets AI models connect to outside tools and data — your files, databases, or apps like Slack and Google Drive — without a developer building a custom connector for every single pairing. Think of it as a USB-C port for AI. Anthropic introduced MCP in 2024 and later handed it over to the Linux Foundation, and it’s since been adopted by OpenAI, Google, and Microsoft, making it one of the fastest-spreading standards in recent AI history.

Mixture of Experts is a model architecture that splits a neural network into many smaller specialized sub-networks, or “experts,” and only activates a handful of them for any given task. Rather than routing every request through the entire model — like calling in your whole office for every question — an MoE model has a built-in “router” that picks just the right specialists for the job. This makes it possible to build enormous models that stay relatively fast and cheap to run, since only a fraction of the network is doing work at any one time. Mistral AI’s Mixtral model is a well-known example; OpenAI’s newer GPT models are also widely believed to use some version of this approach, though the company has never officially confirmed it.

(See: Neural network, Deep learning)

Advertisement

A neural network refers to the multi-layered algorithmic structure that underpins deep learning — and, more broadly, the whole boom in generative AI tools following the emergence of large language models. 

Although the idea of taking inspiration from the densely interconnected pathways of the human brain as a design structure for data processing algorithms dates all the way back to the 1940s, it was the much more recent rise of graphical processing hardware (GPUs) — via the video game industry — that really unlocked the power of this theory. These chips proved well suited to training algorithms with many more layers than was possible in earlier epochs — enabling neural network-based AI systems to achieve far better performance across many domains, including voice recognition, autonomous navigation, and drug discovery.

(See: Large language model [LLM])

Open source refers to software — or, increasingly, AI models — where the underlying code is made publicly available for anyone to use, inspect, or modify. In the AI world, Meta’s Llama family of models is a prominent example; Linux is the famous historical parallel in operating systems. Open source approaches allow researchers, developers, and companies around the world to build on top of one another’s work, accelerating progress and enabling independent safety audits that closed systems cannot easily provide. Closed source means the code is private — you can use the product but not see how it works, as is the case with OpenAI’s GPT models — a distinction that has become one of the defining debates in the AI industry.

Advertisement

Parallelization means doing many things at the same time instead of one after another — like having 10 employees working on different parts of a project at the same time instead of one employee doing everything sequentially. In AI, parallelization is fundamental to both training and inference: modern GPUs are specifically designed to perform thousands of calculations in parallel, which is a big reason why they became the hardware backbone of the industry. As AI systems grow more complex and models grow larger, the ability to parallelize work across many chips and many machines has become one of the most important factors in determining how quickly and cost-effectively models can be built and deployed. Research into better parallelization strategies is now a field of study in its own right.

RAMageddon is the fun new term for a not-so-fun trend that is sweeping the tech industry: an ever-increasing shortage of random access memory, or RAM chips, which power pretty much all the tech products we use in our daily lives. As the AI industry has blossomed, the biggest tech companies and AI labs — all vying to have the most powerful and efficient AI — are buying so much RAM to power their data centers that there’s not much left for the rest of us. And that supply bottleneck means that what’s left is getting more and more expensive.

That includes industries like gaming (where major companies have had to raise prices on consoles because it’s harder to find memory chips for their devices), consumer electronics (where memory shortage could cause the biggest dip in smartphone shipments in more than a decade), and general enterprise computing (because those companies can’t get enough RAM for their own data centers). The surge in prices is only expected to stop after the dreaded shortage ends but, unfortunately, there’s not really much of a sign that’s going to happen anytime soon.  

Like AGI, recursive self-improvement is a threshhold for how smart AI can get, and how little it may rely on humans. In the RSI scenario, AI models start improving themselves without human intervention, leading to a huge acceleration in capabilities and autonomy. In some tellings, this would be a cataclysmic moment akin to the singularity, a moment when AI models become immune to outside intervention. But RSI also describes a basic capability — can an AI model design its own successor? — which makes it much easier for engineers to try to build it. A number of recent AI startups have set out to build recursively self-improving models, but most of them dismiss the apocalyptic implications, presenting RSI as simply the next frontier for research.

Advertisement

Reinforcement learning is a way of training AI where a system learns by trying things and receiving rewards for correct answers — like training your beloved pet with treats, except the “pet” in this scenario is a neural network and the “treat” is a mathematical signal indicating success. Unlike supervised learning, where a model is trained on a fixed dataset of labeled examples, reinforcement learning lets a model explore its environment, take actions, and continuously update its behavior based on the feedback it receives. This approach has proven especially powerful for training AI to play games, control robots, and, more recently, sharpen the reasoning ability of large language models. Techniques like reinforcement learning from human feedback, or RLHF, are now central to how leading AI labs fine-tune their models to be more helpful, accurate, and safe.

When it comes to human-machine communication, there are some obvious challenges — people communicate using human language, while AI programs execute tasks through complex algorithmic processes informed by data. Tokens bridge that gap: they are the basic building blocks of human-AI communication, representing discrete segments of data that have been processed or produced by an LLM. They are created through a process called tokenization, which breaks down raw text into bite-sized units a language model can digest, similar to how a compiler translates human language into binary code a computer can understand. In enterprise settings, tokens also determine cost — most AI companies charge for LLM usage on a per-token basis, meaning the more a business uses, the more it pays.

So again, tokens are the small chunks of text — often parts of words rather than whole ones — that AI language models break language into before processing it; they are roughly analogous to “words” for the purposes of understanding AI workloads. Throughput refers to how much can be processed in a given period of time, so token throughput is essentially a measure of how much AI work a system can handle at once. High token throughput is a key goal for AI infrastructure teams, since it determines how many users a model can serve simultaneously and how quickly each of them receives a response. AI researcher Andrej Karpathy has described feeling anxious when his AI subscriptions sit idle — echoing the feeling he had as a grad student when expensive computer hardware wasn’t being fully utilized — a sentiment that captures why maximizing token throughput has become something of an obsession in the field.

Developing machine learning AIs involves a process known as training. In simple terms, this refers to data being fed in in order that the model can learn from patterns and generate useful outputs. Essentially, it’s the process of the system responding to characteristics in the data that enables it to adapt outputs toward a sought-for goal — whether that’s identifying images of cats or producing a haiku on demand.

Advertisement

Training can be expensive because it requires lots of inputs, and the volumes required have been trending upwards — which is why hybrid approaches, such as fine-tuning a rules-based AI with targeted data, can help manage costs without starting entirely from scratch.

[See: Inference]

A technique where a previously trained AI model is used as the starting point for developing a new model for a different but typically related task — allowing knowledge gained in previous training cycles to be reapplied. 

Transfer learning can drive efficiency savings by shortcutting model development. It can also be useful when data for the task that the model is being developed for is somewhat limited. But it’s important to note that the approach has limitations. Models that rely on transfer learning to gain generalized capabilities will likely require training on additional data in order to perform well in their domain of focus

Advertisement

(See: Fine tuning)

Validation loss is a number that tells you how well an AI model is learning during training — and lower is better. Researchers track it closely as a kind of real-time report card, using it to decide when to stop training, when to adjust hyperparameters, or whether to investigate a potential problem. One of the key concerns it helps flag is overfitting, a condition in which a model memorizes its training data rather than truly learning patterns it can generalize to new situations. Think of it as the difference between a student who genuinely understands the material and one who simply memorized last year’s exam — validation loss helps reveal which one your model is becoming.

Weights are core to AI training, as they determine how much importance (or weight) is given to different features (or input variables) in the data used for training the system — thereby shaping the AI model’s output. 

Put another way, weights are numerical parameters that define what’s most salient in a dataset for the given training task. They achieve their function by applying multiplication to inputs. Model training typically begins with weights that are randomly assigned, but as the process unfolds, the weights adjust as the model seeks to arrive at an output that more closely matches the target.

Advertisement

For example, an AI model for predicting housing prices that’s trained on historical real estate data for a target location could include weights for features such as the number of bedrooms and bathrooms, whether a property is detached or semi-detached, whether it has parking, a garage, and so on. 

Ultimately, the weights the model attaches to each of these inputs reflect how much they influence the value of a property, based on the given dataset.

This article is updated regularly with new information.

When you purchase through links in our articles, we may earn a small commission. This doesn’t affect our editorial independence.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

Tech

Who Needs Valve’s Steam Machine?

Published

on

Plus, we dive into Sony dumping PlayStation discs.

Valve’s Steam Machine is finally here! But while it lives up to much of the hype, its high price makes us wonder who it’s really for. In this episode, Senior Writer Jessica Conditt joins to talk about her experience with the Steam Machine and how it compares to consoles (which have also gotten very expensive). Also, we discuss Sony’s bombshell announcement about killing physical PlayStation discs in 2028 and Xbox’s confusing array of layoffs.

Advertisement

Credits

Hosts: Devindra Hardawar and Jessica Conditt
Producer: Ben Ellman
Music: Dale North and Terrence O’Brien

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Tech

Today’s NYT Connections Hints, Answers for July 4 #1119

Published

on

Looking for the most recent Connections answers? Click here for today’s Connections hints, as well as our daily answers and hints for The New York Times Mini Crossword, Wordle, Connections: Sports Edition and Strands puzzles.


Today’s NYT Connections puzzle has some fun words in the grid. You might recognize the blue category right away. Read on for clues and today’s Connections answers.

The Times has a Connections Bot, like the one for Wordle. Go there after you play to receive a numeric score and to have the program analyze your answers. Players who are registered with the Times Games section can now nerd out by following their progress, including the number of puzzles completed, win rate, number of times they nabbed a perfect score and their win streak.

Advertisement

Read more: Hints, Tips and Strategies to Help You Win at NYT Connections Every Time

Hints for today’s Connections groups

Here are four hints for the groupings in today’s Connections puzzle, ranked from the easiest yellow group to the tough (and sometimes bizarre) purple group.

Yellow group hint: Keep at it.

Advertisement

Green group hint: Limerick is another one.

Blue group hint: Cheers!

Purple group hint: Not sour.

Answers for today’s Connections groups

Yellow group: Persist.

Advertisement

Green group: Kinds of poems.

Blue group: Tropical drinks.

Purple group: Sweet ____.

Read more: Wordle Cheat Sheet: Here Are the Most Popular Letters Used in English Words

Advertisement

What are today’s Connections answers?

completed NYT Connections puzzle for July 4, 2026

The completed NYT Connections puzzle for July 4, 2026.

NYT/Screenshot by CNET

The yellow words in today’s Connections

The theme is persist. The four answers are continue, last, linger and stay.

The green words in today’s Connections

The theme is kinds of poems. The four answers are ballad, epic, ode and villanelle.

Advertisement

The blue words in today’s Connections

The theme is tropical drinks. The four answers are hurricane, painkiller, scorpion and zombie.

The purple words in today’s Connections

The theme is sweet ____. The four answers are dreams, nothings, pea and spot.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Tech

Do Work Zone Workers Have To Be Present For Traffic Cameras To Give You A Ticket?

Published

on





The U.S. Interstate Highway System began taking shape in the 1920s. However, all those projects were put on hold in 1929 when the Great Depression hit, and remained so for decades. In 1956, President Dwight D. Eisenhower signed the National Interstate and Defense Highways Act in response to the explosion of automobiles taking to the roads during the post-war boom, with a plan to build 41,000 miles of highways that ran from sea to shining sea.

In 1954, 58 million registered motor vehicles were on the road in the U.S. Today, there are over 284 million, and it can sometimes feel like we’re all driving around on those same century-old roads. Enter the infamous work zone, where workers don’t necessarily need to be present for you to get a speeding ticket if you’re caught on camera by an Automated Speed Enforcement (ASE) system. As with standard work zones, state laws vary, so always check local regulations.

For instance, New York state statute 1180-E requires workers to be present, and clear signage leading up to the work zone warning that a photo-monitoring system is being used. Caution is advised in NY as State Police are known to wear hard hats and reflective vests to blend in with road construction crews. Much like New York, the state of Washington also requires signage, and enforcement only happens while workers are present in the zone. In Maryland, however, workers don’t need to be present for a traffic camera to issue a ticket. Florida has stringent work zone laws, but by and large doesn’t currently use ASEs in work zones. However, state law allows them to be at intersections and designated school zones (which are common).

Advertisement

Work zone speeding fines can add up

In California, Assembly Bill 289 went into effect in January of 2026. However, it only applies if the appropriate signage stating that it’s “photo enforced” is present and must be located no more than 500 feet ahead of where the system is placed. Furthermore, citations can only be issued when construction workers are present.

Fines associated with these relatively new ASE laws can vary widely depending on the scenario. Going 11 to 15 mph over the posted speed limit in California carries a $50 fine (like in New York) and can escalate to $500 for speeds of 100 mph or greater. In New York, though, a second violation is $75 (if it occurred within 18 months of the first), while subsequent violations are $100 (again, if within 18 months of the first). In Maryland, the current tiered schedule starts at $60 for going 12 to 15 mph over the posted limit and goes up to $500 for driving 40 mph or more over the posted limit; those fines double if workers are present. Beginning on July 1, 2026, Washington drivers can expect a first-time infraction to cost $125, with subsequent infractions increasing to $248. On May 1, the state began requiring initial driver’s license applicants under 25 to pass an online work zone and first responder safety course before receiving their license.

Advertisement

More and more, states are using ASE systems to keep everyone safe because work zones are inherently dangerous due to uneven pavement, narrower lanes, concrete barriers, and strange orange lines on the road. Ultimately, it’s better to be safe than sorry. Stick to the letter of the law when traveling through them because, in the grand scheme of things, it’s a momentary annoyance that’s not worth a lifetime of regret.



Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Tech

Alibaba bans Claude Code over hidden Chinese user tracking

Published

on

TL;DR

Alibaba banned Claude Code after security researchers found Anthropic had embedded steganographic tracking code to identify Chinese users. The ban follows Anthropic’s accusation that Alibaba ran the largest known distillation attack on its models.

Alibaba has banned its employees from using Claude Code, Anthropic’s AI-powered coding agent, after security researchers discovered that the tool contained hidden code designed to identify Chinese users. The ban, effective 10 July, follows weeks of escalating conflict between the two companies over allegations that Alibaba stole Anthropic’s AI capabilities through industrial-scale distillation.

Advertisement

As Claude Code was recently discovered to carry back-door risks, after comprehensive evaluation, Claude Code has now been added to a list of high-risk software with security vulnerabilities,” Alibaba said in an internal notice reported by the South China Morning Post. The company recommended employees use Qoder, its own coding agent platform, as a substitute.

How the tracking worked

A Reddit user identified as LegitMichel777 reverse-engineered Claude Code on 30 June and found obfuscated code that had been silently present since version 2.1.91, released on 2 April, with no mention in the release notes. The code checked whether a user’s system timezone was set to Asia/Shanghai or Asia/Urumqi and scanned proxy URLs against a hardcoded list of Chinese domains and AI lab addresses.

Rather than logging the results conventionally, the system used steganography to hide its signals in the system prompt sent back to Anthropic’s servers. If the timezone was Chinese, the date format changed from dashes to slashes, and the apostrophe in “Today’s date is” was swapped with one of three visually identical but technically distinct Unicode characters depending on which flags were triggered.

The alterations are invisible to human users and potentially even to the AI model itself, but they are machine-parseable by Anthropic’s servers. Portions of the detection code were XOR-obfuscated with the key 91, a technique used to prevent plain-text extraction during code analysis.

Advertisement

Anthropic’s response

Thariq Shihipar, an Anthropic engineer on the Claude Code team, said on X that the tracking was “an experiment we launched in March that was meant to prevent account abuse from unauthorised resellers and protect against distillation.” He said the team had been “meaning to take this down for a while” and that the pull request to remove it was merged on 1 July.

The rollback coincided with the restoration of Anthropic’s Fable 5 and Mythos 5 models, which the US Commerce Department had ordered the company to disable for all foreign nationals in mid-June after Amazon researchers found a jailbreak vulnerability. The export controls were lifted on 30 June, and Anthropic restored access on 2 July, saying it would “scale up government collaboration” on frontier AI security.

The distillation backdrop

Anthropic’s justification for the tracking code sits within a broader campaign against what it calls systematic theft of its models’ capabilities. In a letter to the US Senate Banking Committee on 10 June, the company accused operators affiliated with Alibaba’s Qwen AI lab of running the largest known distillation attack on Claude, using roughly 25,000 fraudulent accounts to generate 28.8 million exchanges between April and June.

Alibaba has denied the accusation. Anthropic had previously named DeepSeek, Moonshot AI, and MiniMax in February as perpetrators of similar campaigns, framing distillation as an existential threat to the business models of frontier AI companies.

Advertisement

Distillation, the practice of using a powerful model’s outputs to train a smaller one, occupies a grey area in AI development. Asian AI startups have launched alternatives to Anthropic’s models partly because the export ban on Fable 5 and Mythos 5 left a gap in the market, making the line between legitimate competition and illicit extraction increasingly difficult to draw.

The developer trust problem

Claude Code requires deep access to a developer’s local file system to read, modify, and execute code, meaning any hidden functionality in the tool effectively has access to everything on the machine. Huorong Security, a Chinese cybersecurity firm, said Anthropic’s tracking was not only a transparency issue but also raised cross-border data compliance concerns.

Today it’s a timezone check, tomorrow it could be system sabotage or data exfiltration,” one Reddit user wrote. Anthropic’s privacy policy states that it collects the kind of data in question, but critics argue the steganographic method, designed to be invisible to users, crosses a line that a standard privacy disclosure does not.

The bigger picture

The episode accelerates China’s push to reduce reliance on American AI tools, which Chinese firms increasingly view as carrying legal, security, and operational risks. Alibaba has been building out its own AI stack aggressively, integrating its Qwen models across products from e-commerce to robotics, and the Claude Code ban gives it further justification to push employees toward domestic alternatives.

Advertisement

Lizzi Lee, a fellow at the Asia Society Policy Institute’s Centre for China Analysis, said the conflict showed how the US-China AI competition has moved beyond technology into access control and sovereignty. “If a US AI coding tool can detect Chinese usage or proxy access, then it’s not surprising for major Chinese tech companies to not want employees using it internally,” she said.

Anthropic’s models have long been officially inaccessible in China, but they remain popular among domestic developers who use workarounds to maintain access. Whether the tracking controversy pushes more of them toward Chinese alternatives or simply confirms what many already suspected about the risks of depending on American AI tools is a question that extends well beyond Alibaba.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Tech

Amazon has slashed nearly 50% off this Eufy robo vac

Published

on

The eufy Omni C20 is built for households that don’t want to bother with constant cleaning.

This vobo vac has dropped to £308.99 from its original price of £599, a saving of 48% that brings a fully automated cleaning station within much easier reach.

Eufy Omni C20 on a white backgroundEufy Omni C20 on a white background

Save nearly 50% on this Eufy robo vac

A saving of 48% brings Eufy’s fantastic fully automated cleaning station within much easier reach of most budgets.

Advertisement

View Deal

The station itself does the unglamorous work most robot vacuums leave to their owner, since it empties dust into a 3.1 litre bag, washes the mop pads, and dries them with room temperature air once the C20 docks.

Advertisement

That drying step alone cuts energy use by 57 times compared with heated methods, which matters if you would rather this thing run quietly in the background than announce itself every time it recharges.

The Whatsapp LogoThe Whatsapp Logo

Get Updates Straight to Your WhatsApp

Join Now

Advertisement

Advertisement

None of that automation counts for much if the vacuum itself struggles to get under furniture, and this is where the eufy Omni C20’s 3.35 inch body earns its keep, sliding beneath sofas, beds, and low cabinets at just 90mm tall with room to spare, reaching the strips of floor that upright vacuums and clumsier robots consistently miss.

Suction sits at 7,000 Pa in its strongest mode, enough to lift pet hair, crumbs, and general debris across hard floors and carpet alike without needing a second pass over the same stubborn patch of mess.

Advertisement

Hair wrapping around the brush is one of the more tedious habits of any robot vacuum, so the Pro-Detangle Comb built into the roller exists specifically to stop that problem before it starts.

Mopping gets the same attention to detail, since the dual pads spin at 180 rotations per minute with 6N of downward pressure to lift dried stains rather than just smear them across the floor.

Carpets are handled with equal care, as the C20 detects the change underfoot and lifts its mop by 0.41 inches so rugs and carpeted rooms are vacuumed without getting soaked in the process.

For a broader sense of how the Omni C20 stacks up against everything else worth considering this year, our Best Vacuum Cleaner 2026 guide rounds up the models actually earning their place in a UK home right now.

Advertisement

Advertisement

SQUIRREL_PLAYLIST_10148964

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Tech

NYT Strands hints and answers for Saturday, July 4 (game #853)

Published

on

Looking for a different day?

A new NYT Strands puzzle appears at midnight each day for your time zone – which means that some people are always playing ‘today’s game’ while others are playing ‘yesterday’s’. If you’re looking for Friday’s puzzle instead then click here: NYT Strands hints and answers for Friday, July 3 (game #852).

Strands is the NYT’s latest word game after the likes of Wordle, Spelling Bee and Connections – and it’s great fun. It can be difficult, though, so read on for my Strands hints.

Want more word-based fun? Then check out my NYT Connections today and Quordle today pages for hints and answers for those games, and Marc’s Wordle today page for the original viral word game.

Advertisement

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Tech

Palantir’s CEO spent $200M on properties nobody can find

Published

on

TL;DR

Palantir CEO Alex Karp has assembled a $200M+ real estate portfolio centred on seclusion, from a 3,700-acre Colorado monastery to a Miami compound. The privacy-obsessed lifestyle contrasts sharply with the surveillance software his company sells to governments.

Alex Karp, the co-founder and chief executive of Palantir Technologies, has quietly assembled a real estate portfolio worth more than $200 million across a reported 20 properties worldwide. The common thread is seclusion: a former monastery in the Colorado mountains, a rural compound in New Hampshire, and a pair of mansions on a gated Miami island.

Advertisement

Karp, whose net worth stood at $14.4 billion as of early July according to the Bloomberg Billionaires Index, has said he never learned to drive because he was once “too poor” and is now “too rich.” The fortune that funds his acquisitions comes from Palantir, whose revenue hit $1.63 billion in Q1 2026, up 85% year over year, driven by surging demand for its AI and data analytics platforms from governments and defence agencies.

The monastery

In December 2025, Karp paid $120 million for the Saint Benedict’s Monastery ranch, a 3,700-acre property in the Capitol Creek Valley near Snowmass, Colorado, about 15 miles north of Aspen. The deal, transacted through an entity called Espen LLC, set a record for Pitkin County and was one of the largest residential sales in Colorado history.

Trappist monks of the Cistercian Order of the Strict Observance had stewarded the land since 1956, supporting themselves through farming and candy sales. Their numbers dwindled over the decades until only five remained, and the order’s General Chapter voted to close the monastery in the autumn of 2022.

The property was listed for $150 million in April 2024 before selling for $30 million below asking. The compound includes a chapel, monks’ living quarters, a retreat centre, 1,200 acres of irrigated meadows with senior water rights, and three creek systems stretching more than five miles.

Karp is an avid cross-country skier who reportedly trains 12 to 15 miles daily. A 3,700-acre property in the Elk Mountains is a fitting base for someone whose fitness regime is better described as vocational.

Advertisement

The Miami compound

In June 2025, a Delaware entity called Hibiscus East LLC purchased a nearly 10,000-square-foot waterfront mansion at 55 East San Marino Drive for $46 million. Business Insider reported that the LLC is linked to a New Hampshire attorney and accounting firm that have appeared on documents tied to Karp’s previous transactions.

Karp then bought the house next door at 29 East San Marino Drive for $28.5 million, bringing his total investment on the island to nearly $75 million. The second property was listed at $30 million and went under contract in eight days.

Together, the two lots total more than 0.8 acres with 265 feet of waterfront, and The Real Deal reported that the acquisitions appear to be the start of a compound. San Marino is one of six man-made Venetian Islands in Biscayne Bay, an exclusive enclave whose past and present residents include basketball player Dwyane Wade and singer Gloria Estefan.

The Miami purchases predated Palantir’s decision to relocate its headquarters from Denver to Aventura, a Miami-area suburb, in February 2026. The company is currently operating from a co-working space while searching for permanent offices in areas including Wynwood, Brickell, and Coral Gables.

Advertisement

The New Hampshire compound

Karp’s reported primary residence is a 500-acre estate in Lyman, New Hampshire, part of which he purchased for $825,000 in 2019. He has been known to work from the property’s barn.

Lyman is a rural town in Grafton County with fewer than 600 residents, nearly two hours south of Manchester. Despite running one of the most closely watched companies in the defence technology sector, Karp chose a near-invisible town as home base, a pattern that extends across every significant property in his portfolio.

What Palantir builds

The seclusion of Karp’s lifestyle is striking because of what Palantir does. The company took over Project Maven, the Pentagon’s AI drone analysis programme that Google abandoned after employee protests, and its platforms power surveillance systems used by ICE, the military, and hundreds of local law enforcement agencies across the United States.

Karp has defended this work as essential to national security, arguing that democracies need tools powerful enough to compete with authoritarian adversaries. The company continues to expand its government footprint, competing for contracts including the FAA’s predictive air traffic AI system, and its stock has risen more than 600% since the start of 2024.

Advertisement

The pattern

Karp’s net worth fluctuates with Palantir’s share price, which has traded between $106 and $208 over the past year, meaning the Bloomberg figure is a snapshot rather than a fixed number. The reported 20-property portfolio has not been independently confirmed in its entirety.

What is confirmed is the scale of his recent purchases: $120 million in Colorado, $75 million in Miami, and a 500-acre estate in one of the least populated towns in New Hampshire. Together, they form a portfolio designed around a single principle that Karp’s own company has made a $75 billion business out of undermining: the right to be left alone.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Tech

Macy’s 4th of July Fireworks Special 2026: How to Watch From Anywhere

Published

on

73% off with 2yr plan (+4 free months). Now only $3.49/month


See more details

Advertisement
People watch as fireworks light up the sky above the Brooklyn Bridge during Macy's 4th of July fireworks show on July 4, 2025 in New York City.

Adam Gray/Getty Images

With a dual celebration to mark, the 2026 Macy’s fourth of July Fireworks special is all set to light up the sky like never before. If you’ve not managed to score a prime spot to view the display or are away from the Big Apple, you can tune in to catch the show on TV.

The New York institution is now in its 50th year, a landmark which dovetails nicely with this year’s July Fourth celebrations marking America’s 250th birthday. With launch sites on the lower East River in the Seaport District, the lower Hudson River and the iconic Brooklyn Bridge, this year’s display is set to feature over 85,000 shells — its biggest number ever — as well as ground-breaking laser elements. 

Read on for details on how to watch the Macy’s 4th of July Fireworks show from anywhere.

Advertisement

What time does the Macy’s 4th of July Fireworks Special start?

The two-hour TV special will air live on Saturday, July 4, at 8 p.m. ET/PT on NBC and Peacock. 

Brooklyn Nine-Nine’s Terry Crews will be hosting for the first time, while there’s a star-studded musical lineup that sees Noah Kahan, Post Malone, Salt-N-Pepa, Bebe Rexha, Shaboozey and Blake Shelton all performing. 

Rounding out the show will be the much-anticipated fireworks display, which is set to be soundtracked by a score by Grammy Award-winning composer Jason Howland that will feature live vocals by The Voice season 29 winner Alexia Jayy. 

Advertisement

Stream the Macy’s 4th of July Fireworks Special on Peacock

For those looking for an alternative to NBC, the event is streaming live as a simulcast on Peacock

Peacock/CNET

Peacock currently costs $11 per month for the ad-supported Peacock Premium plan and $17 per month for the ad-free Peacock Premium Plus plan. 

Advertisement

Watch the Macy’s 4th of July Fireworks Special on a live TV streaming service

If you’ve ditched cable, you can still catch this year’s event with a subscription to a live TV streaming service like YouTube TV, Hulu with Live TV, Fubo or Sling. Note that NBC is available only in select cities with Sling Blue or Sling Blue + Orange subscriptions.  

Sarah Tew/CNET

How to watch the Macy’s 4th of July Fireworks Special using a VPN

If you’re traveling abroad and want to watch the event while away from home, a VPN can help enhance your privacy and security when streaming. 

It encrypts your traffic and prevents your internet service provider from throttling your speeds. Additionally, it can be helpful when connecting to public Wi-Fi networks while traveling, providing an extra layer of protection for your devices and logins. VPNs are legal in many countries, including the US and Canada, and can be used for legitimate purposes such as improving online privacy and security. 

However, some streaming services may have policies restricting VPN use to access region-specific content. If you’re considering a VPN for streaming, check the platform’s terms of service to ensure compliance. 

Advertisement

If you choose to use a VPN, follow the provider’s installation instructions to ensure you’re connected securely and in compliance with applicable laws and service agreements. Some streaming platforms may block access when a VPN is detected, so verifying if your streaming subscription allows VPN use is crucial.

James Martin/CNET

Price $78 for two yearsLatest Tests No DNS leaks detected, 18% speed loss in 2025 testsJurisdiction British Virgin IslandsNetwork 3,000 plus servers in 105 countries

Advertisement

ExpressVPN is our current best VPN pick for people who want a reliable and safe VPN, and it works on a variety of devices. It’s normally $120 a year for its most popular plan (Advanced), but if you sign up for an annual subscription right now, you’ll save $45.

Advertisement
73% off with 2yr plan (+4 free months). Now only $3.49/month

Source link

Continue Reading

Tech

Amazon’s Fire HD 10 Tablet Just Got A Refresh With A Bit More RAM

Published

on

We may receive a commission on purchases made from links.

Amazon’s mid-tier Fire HD 10 tablet just got a surprise refresh. The big news here is that the RAM has increased from 3GB to 4GB. This model has had 3GB of RAM for years and actually launched with just 2GB way back in 2017.

Otherwise, the specs remain the same. It features a 2GHz octa-core processor, a 10.1-inch FHD touchscreen and a battery that lasts for around 13 hours. This new model does seem to charge a bit quicker, as it can juice up in four hours instead of five.

There are a few caveats. The new Fire HD 10 is only available with 32GB of storage, and the old models were available in both 32GB and 64GB. We reached out to Amazon to ask if it plans to add a 64GB model in the future.

Advertisement

Also, it’s 2026. There’s no such thing as a free RAM lunch. This tablet costs $155, which is around $15 more than the previous gen. Finally, you can only buy it with lockscreen ads. I have a Kindle and a Fire tablet and have never found the ads to be that annoying, and I typically loathe that kind of thing.

This isn’t quite a budget tablet, but it doesn’t quite have the juice for intensive creative applications. The Fire HD 10 is a good device for laying in bed and watching stuff and it’s even safe around kids, as these things are pretty durable in my experience.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Tech

This KVM runs a P4 instead of a Pi.

Published

on

If you asked us to build you a KVM last week, we’d likely have reached for a Raspberry Pi. Now, thanks to [JonathanRowny], we’d seriously consider an ESP32-P4, because his IP KVM seems pretty capable.

He’s using the P4 hardware to its fullest, getting the supported 1080p graphics, and doing so in an interesting way– he’s got a commercial adapter board to try and translate HDMI signals to the camera input on his dev board. Conveniently enough, it’s the same ribbon-cable pinout as the RPi, which is not guaranteed by the CSI standard. Writing a driver to take that signal proved the hardest part– aside from the usual chip revision confusion that plagues this chip– and we can’t help but wonder if the client on the other side of the KVM-IP link might have an easier time doing the image processing that was required for a good image. Regardless, he’s got the code as it is now up on GitHub under the Apache license. 

As of this this writing, there’s no audio, and ironically for an ESP32 project networking is wired-only– but much more importantly, there is no security. So it’s a work in progress, but great to see the P4 in the wild doing something other than emulation. Not that we haven’t seen the P4 at work before–the Tanmatsu handheld also makes use of Expressif’s most powerful chip for a handy little terminal. Between the KVM and the handhelds, we cannot help but wonder how many of the projects that were once the provenance of a Pi will get squeezed into these overpowered microcontrollers. Sure, they can’t even match the original Pi in horsepower, never mind a modern Pi5, but how many times have you seen a Linux SBC seriously under-taxed in a project like this?

If you’re swapping Pi for P4– or doing anything else interesting– please let us know on the tips line.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2025