President Donald Trump on Thursday revoked the 2009 endangerment finding, which has long been the central basis for U.S. action to regulate greenhouse gas emissions and fight climate change.
But in making the announcement, Trump and Environmental Protection Agency Administrator Lee Zeldin made false claims regarding the government declaration, climate change, and energy.
Here’s a closer look at the facts.
___
Advertisement
TRUMP: “Known as the endangerment finding, this determination had no basis in fact, had none whatsoever, and it had no basis in law.”
THE FACTS: This is false. The endangerment finding was adopted in 2009 by the EPA after the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in 2007 that greenhouse gases are air pollutants that can be regulated under the Clean Air Act.
“The idea that the endangerment finding has no basis in law is ludicrous,” said Ann Carlson, a professor of environmental law at the University of California, Los Angeles. “The Supreme Court in Massachusetts v. EPA specifically directed the Environmental Protection Agency to determine whether greenhouse gases endanger public health and welfare. The endangerment finding is the result.”
Scientific evidence to support the endangerment finding was provided by the EPA at the time of its inception and is still available on the agency’s website today.
Advertisement
Multiple federal courts have upheld the endangerment finding since it was adopted 16 years ago. ___
TRUMP: “We’ve basically stopped all windmills in this country. It’s the most expensive energy you can get.”
THE FACTS: Onshore wind is one of the cheapest sources of electricity generation, with new wind farms expected to produce around $30 per megawatt hour, according to July estimates from the Energy Information Administration.
This compares to a new natural gas plant, around $65 per megawatt hour, or a new advanced nuclear reactor, which runs over $80. Offshore wind is among the sources of new power generation that will cost the most to build and operate, at $88 per megawatt hour, the EIA said in July.
Advertisement
___ TRUMP, asked about the cost to health and the environment: “It has nothing to do with public health. This is all a scam, a giant scam. This was a rip off of the country by Obama and Biden, and let’s say Obama started it and got it rolling and a terrible rip off.”
THE FACTS: Thousands of peer-reviewed scientific studies connect health harms to climate change. They find increasing deaths from heat waves, extreme weather such as hurricanes and floods and air pollution from worsening wildfires. A 2021 study in Nature Climate Change calculated that globally about 9,700 people die a year from heat-related deaths attributable to human-caused climate change, based on data from 732 cities, including more than 200 in the United States.
A separate study last year listed dozens of climate change health harms and concluded, using the EPA’s own calculation method, that the health costs are at least $10 billion a year, probably much more.
The science of climate change dates back nearly 170 years to studies done by American Eunice Foote showing that carbon dioxide heated cylinders with thermometers inside more than ambient air. The first national climate assessment, done in 2000, before Obama and Biden, “concluded that climate variability and change are likely to increase morbidity and mortality risks.”
Advertisement
___
ZELDIN: “The Obama and Biden administrations used the endangerment finding to steamroll into existence a left-wing wish, including electric vehicle mandates.”
THE FACTS: Trump has made this claim before. There was no federal mandate to force the purchase of EVs.
“If you looked at some of the tables that were in the Biden rules, you could see that there were a variety of different ways that companies could comply with the standards,” said Carrie Jenks, the executive director of Harvard Law School’s environmental and energy law program. “The endangerment finding nor the regulations mandated a shift from one type of vehicle to another.”
Advertisement
Former President Joe Biden did set up a non-binding goal that EVs make up half of new cars sold by 2030. Trump issued an executive order on his first day in office revoking that goal.
Biden’s policies tightened restrictions on pollution from gas-powered cars and trucks in an effort to encourage Americans to buy EVs and car companies to shift from gas-powered vehicles to electric cars. ___
Associated Press writers Seth Borenstein and Matthew Daly in Washington contributed to this report.
Cabin crew working on an Emirates flight found a passenger had become “unresponsive” moments before landing in the UK and despite their best efforts, was later declared dead.
Doctors and staff on the the Emirates flight EK067 raced to the aid of the man, just as the jet was preparing to make its landing at Stansted Airport on February 8, reports The Mirror.
Advertisement
The flight had departed Dubai for the UK but it wasn’t until the end of the journey that the man was found in an apparent medical emergency.
Flight attendants and other medical professionals on board the flight attempted to provide emergency medical attention to the passenger, Emirates confirmed in a statement. However, despite their best efforts, he remained “unresponsive”.
After the plane landed at Stansted, it was confirmed by authorities that the man had died. An Emirates spokesperson said that the airline offered its “deepest condolences” to the passenger’s loved ones.
A statement from the airline read: “On Emirates flight EK067 from Dubai to London Stansted on February 8, cabin crew found a passenger unconscious as the aircraft was preparing for descent. Our crew, assisted by doctors on board, provided immediate emergency support; however, the passenger remained unresponsive.
Advertisement
“Upon arrival, local medical authorities met the aircraft and confirmed that the passenger had sadly passed away. Emirates offers its deepest condolences to the passenger’s family and loved ones.”
It has been alleged that the 23-year-old fell from the fifth floor of the apartment block after a “railing gave way” as he looked over a ledge to see if a pizza delivery had arrived
The Prime Minister has written to the grieving parents of Joshua Robbins as they continue their call for answers surrounding his death.
Advertisement
Joshua Robbins from Claudy died suddenly on Thursday, January 29, at Thurston Dwellings on Newton Street in the city, breaking the hearts of his family and friends. He has been described as a “happy, go lucky young man” who had a love for life.
It has been alleged that the 23-year-old fell from the fifth floor of the apartment block after a “railing gave way” as he looked over a ledge to see if a pizza delivery had arrived.
His parents called for answers surrounding her son’s death and have contacted the MP for Holborn and St Pancras where Joshua lived, Prime Minister Keir Starmer, who has written to the couple offering his condolences and saying that he will keep in contact with them.
Advertisement
In the letter, the Prime Minster said: “I am very sorry to learn of the death of your son, Joshua.
“I cannot begin to imagine how you both must be feeling. Please accept my condolences for your terrible loss.
“At a time wher you wish above all else to grieve, you will of course want to know the truth of exactly how this could have happened. Following your contact with my constituency office, enquiries have been made, and we will continue to do all we can to help you get answers to the questions that you have rightly asked about the circumstances of Joshua’s death.
Advertisement
“We will remain in regular contact with you, and I hope that you will feel able to do the same during this unspeakably difficult time.”
Joshua’s mother Fiona took to social media to thank the Prime Minister for his response, along with NI Alliance MP Sorcha Eastwood.
She said: “Two weeks ago today my 23-year-old son was killed when a railing failed at his apartment block. Two days later I was in London, writing to the Prime Minister.
“I was also contacted by Sorcha Eastwood MP who had seen what happened to our family and wanted to help and today I received a letter from Sir Keir Starmer MP KC – Prime Minister Josh’s MP for Holborn and St.Pancras.
Advertisement
“In your darkest hour, you learn who acts, not just who speaks. I will always judge people by how they treat you when you are broken. Today, I am grateful for the action, support and the willingness to help us get answers.
A yellow warning is in force for snow and ice overnight on Thursday and into Friday for Scotland. Snow amounts of a few centimetres even on lower roads could be in store by Friday morning.
On hills above 300m there could be up to 2 to 5cm, with 10cm possible in places.
In addition to the snow, ice will also be a hazard.
A second yellow warning for snow and ice is also in force for northern England and the north Midlands. Here snow will fall at low levels but is not likely to settle below 200 metres. These higher levels could see 2 to 5cm and it’s expected that a few locations above 300m may see as much as 10 cm.
Advertisement
This is likely to cause disruption on routes across the Pennines and for Derbyshire and Cumbria. With temperatures plummeting below freezing overnight, the combination of snow and ice could lead to treacherous conditions on untreated roads and pavements.
Saturday will start cold and frosty with the whole of the UK seeing some sunshine and should be the driest day for a good while.
However Saturday night and Sunday brings a renewed risk of snow, quite widely and even at low levels. Keep checking the BBC Weather website and app for all the latest details.
And the hour-by-hour forecast for your area is always available on the BBC Weather website and app.
The actor is understood to have passed away at his Connecticut residence.
23:15, 12 Feb 2026Updated 23:19, 12 Feb 2026
Bud Cort has passed away aged 77. The performer achieved iconic status through his role alongside Ruth Gordon in the 1971 picture Harold and Maude, which subsequently became a beloved cult favourite.
Writer and producer Dorian Hannaway, a dear companion of the star, confirmed he died following “a long illness,” the BBC reports. The actor is understood to have passed away at his Connecticut residence, whilst a memorial gathering is expected to take place in Los Angeles.
Throughout his distinguished career, which saw him receive numerous accolades and nominations, he also featured in Ugly Betty, the hit noughties programme that launched America Ferrera to stardom, alongside the 2001 comedy Coyote Ugly, starring Piper Perabo and Adam Garcia.
Advertisement
Bud leaves behind his brother Joseph Cox and sister-in-law Vickie, as well as his nieces. Actress Roslyn Kind, sibling of entertainment icon Barbra Streisand, was amongst the first to honour her late friend.
In her tribute, she reminisced about their shared passion for the arts which flourished during their school years, reports the Mirror.
She reflected: “I was only fourteen when I met Bud at the backstage door at my sister’s play. He was majoring in art at the time in high school. We became close friends who shared our interest in entertainment.
Advertisement
“When I got married, Bud and our songwriter friend, Bruce Roberts, wrote a special song that was performed at the ceremony. His unique spirit will always be with me!” Born Walter Edward Cox, he adopted the stage name Cort upon entering showbusiness to prevent any mix-up with Wally Cox, an actor then famous for working alongside his close companion Marlon Brando. Director Robert Altman spotted Cort’s potential in 1970, casting him in M*A*S*H before handing him the lead in Brewster McCloud.
The following year brought his defining performance as a death-fixated young man in Harold and Maude, whose outlook transforms through an unlikely friendship with an ageing Holocaust survivor. Whilst initial reception proved lukewarm, Cort confessed in 2012 that he’d always recognised its destiny as a cinematic landmark.
Get more Daily Record exclusives by signing up for free to Google’s preferred sources. Click HERE
Speaking to TrainWreckdSociety, he recalled: “As I was reading the script, I immediately knew it was going to be a classic film for the ages. There was no denying it.
“The studio was stumped on how to publicise it. The art for newspapers and theatre posters was plain black, block lettering on an empty background; it was more appropriate for The Ten Commandments!”.
“Truthfully, its success came from the people. The ground swell of word of mouth dropkicked it over so many goalposts both here and abroad- that Paramount had to re-release it.”
Cort subsequently secured a guest spot in Criminal Minds, before landing a supporting role in Eagleheart during 2012. His final professional appearance was a voice performance as The King in The Little Prince, sharing the cast with Paul Rudd, Ricky Gervais and Mean Girls actress Rachel McAdams alongside numerous other stars.
Surgery patients have left been unprotected against ‘abuse’, and others are so used to delays that they have stopped asking for help at one of the country’s biggest NHS trusts, shocking inspection findings have revealed. Helena Vesty reports.
Patients have been left in pain, while others stopped asking for help after facing delays to their care amid shocking staffing shortages at one of Greater Manchester’s major hospitals.
Advertisement
Surgical services at Salford Royal Hospital have been served with a warning notice by health inspectors after they found patients were at risk of abuse and that bottles and bed pans of urine were left to accumulate in ward bathrooms, with staff short on time to clear them.
Surgical services have now been rated as ‘requires improvement’ by health watchdog the Care Quality Commission (CQC). It follows an inspection from September 23 to 25. The visit was carried out ‘due to concerns regarding how gynaecology, spinal and neurosurgery services are managed, as well as to look at their safety processes’.
The latest review came after the CQC found regulatory breaches at a previous inspection. ‘Most of these remained a concern at this latest inspection’, inspectors said.
Advertisement
In shocking findings, inspectors discovered that ‘some aspects of the service were not always safe’, and ‘there was an increased risk that people could be harmed’.
Inspectors said staff didn’t always make sure patients weren’t protected ‘from abuse or improper treatment’; patients weren’t told about their rights around consent didn’t have their rights respected during care and treatment; and that ‘staff didn’t always complete risk assessments or appropriately manage people’s deteriorating health to keep people safe’.
There were also concerns that patients were left waiting for pain relief and support with their personal care. During the inspection, four people on one ward told the watchdog that they ‘experienced extended pain symptoms and had experienced delays in receiving pain relief medicines’. Staff told the CQC that multiple patients had experienced delays in receiving post-operative pain relief.
Staff told inspectors patients ‘would leave their individually-labelled bed pans or bottles in the bathroom for staff to collect when they had time’. That leads to a ‘risk this could lead to inaccurate recording of fluids as the bed pans and bottles absorbed some of the liquid’, the watchdog said.
Advertisement
Results published today (Friday, February 13) show the CQC has issued a warning notice to the Northern Care Alliance NHS Foundation Trust (NCA), which runs Salford Royal. The warning notice highlights the areas where ‘rapid and significant improvements’ are needed.
The official warning means the CQC can take further action if improvements aren’t made within a short period of time, including recommending that the services be taken over by another body, called ‘special administration’.
Major improvements being urged in the warning notice include ‘staffing levels, as well as systems and processes used to identify and manage risks, which were affecting quality and safety on the wards’, the watchdog said.
Inspectors found wards did not have enough staff with the right qualifications to deal with patients. Patients ‘felt staffing shortages had impacted their emotional well-being and they didn’t always feel comfortable asking for help when they needed it, due to experiencing previous delays, especially during the night’, the CQC has said.
The report reads: “Most people told us the surgical wards did not have enough nursing and support staff… We spoke with people on some surgical wards who experienced delays in receiving pain relief and support with their personal care needs.
“People who used the service were not always safeguarded in the surgical wards. Formal duty of candour was not always undertaken in a timely way in accordance with trust policies.”
In addition to the concerns in the warning notice, inspectors found some 11 regulatory breaches relating to safeguarding people from abuse and improper treatment, as well as duty of candour.
Advertisement
These breaches were also regarding ‘person-centred care, safe care and treatment, good management of the service and staffing’, which had already been identified as problems at the last inspection in December 2022.
Inspectors found that surgical staff are supposed to formally identify a patient’s loved one if and when things go wrong within 27 hours, but no later than 10 days after the incident. Records showed that staff only told the relevant contact within 10 days just over two-thirds (68 per cent) of the time in one division of the surgical services.
The report continues: “The general environment in some surgical wards was aged and worn…
“Staff were not always trained to provide safe care. The surgical services reported that only 18.3 per cent of eligible staff had completed dementia awareness training during the past three years. The proportion of staff that had completed life support training was below trust targets.
Advertisement
“The services did not always manage infection prevention and control risks well. Staff compliance with hand hygiene standards and admission screening processes was consistently below trust standards. The services did not always make sure that medicines and treatments were safe and met people’s needs, capacities and preferences.”
The trust responded to the report saying improvements are now underway, including increasing staffing across surgical wards, with nine additional working-time equivalent registered nurses in post between September and January, and strengthened senior nursing presence during late, weekend and twilight shifts.
NCA chief nursing officer, Juliette Cosgrove said: “We know we haven’t always got things right and still have work to do to improve. We have been working closely with the CQC since their inspection in September 2025, alongside NHS England and our partner organisations to make improvements as quickly and openly as possible.
“Our colleagues are crucial to this process, and we’ve spent time listening and making sure they have the chance to share their views on what we can do to make things better.”
Advertisement
Inspectors identified that there were plans to improve equipment servicing and maintenance, and that staff understood how to identify and manage sepsis.
The watchdog also found that leaders engaged with partners and the wider community to plan and improve services, and that the service supported people to live healthier lives and where possible, reduced their future needs for care and support.
Northern Care Alliance Foundation Trust covers a population of one million across its four hospitals – Salford Royal, The Royal Oldham Hospital, Fairfield General Hospital in Bury, and Rochdale Infirmary.
The hospital is also the regional centre for major trauma, neurosurgery, and upper gastrointestinal and bariatric care. It is also a centre for complex spinal care and intestinal failure. The surgical services had 15,400 attendances between October 2024 and September 2025.
Advertisement
After the latest inspection, the CQC has again rated how safe, effective, responsive and well-led the surgery services are as requiring improvement. How caring the service is has declined from good to requires improvement. The overall rating for Salford Royal Hospital and the NCA has not changed, and stands at requires improvement.
Kathy Ruemmler, a top lawyer at Goldman Sachs and a former White House counsel to Barack Obama, announced her resignation on Thursday. The move follows the emergence of emails with convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, which reportedly showed a close relationship where she described him as an “older brother” and appeared to downplay his sex crimes.
Ruemmler confirmed she would “step down as Chief Legal Officer and General Counsel of Goldman Sachs as of June 30, 2026.”
She had previously attempted to distance herself from the correspondence, having been defiant about not resigning from the senior legal post she held since 2020.
While Ruemmler has recently called Epstein a “monster,” her relationship with him was markedly different before his 2019 arrest for sex crimes and subsequent death by suicide. Emails reveal she referred to Epstein as “Uncle Jeffrey” and stated she adored him.
Advertisement
Ruemmler had previously attempted to distance herself from the correspondence, having been defiant about not resigning from the senior legal post she held since 2020. (Michael M. Santiago/Getty Images)
In a statement before her resignation, a Goldman Sachs spokesperson said Ruemmler “regrets ever knowing him.”
During her time in private practice after she left the White House in 2014, Ruemmler received several expensive gifts from Epstein, including luxury handbags and a fur coat. The gifts were given after Epstein had already been convicted of sex crimes in 2008 and was registered as a sex offender.
“So lovely and thoughtful! Thank you to Uncle Jeffrey!!!” Ruemmler wrote to Epstein in 2018.
Historically, Wall Street frowns on gift-giving between clients and bankers or Wall Street lawyers, particularly high-end gifts that could pose a conflict of interest. Goldman Sachs requires its employees to get preapproval before receiving or giving gifts from clients, according to the company’s code of conduct, partly in order to not run afoul of anti-bribery laws.
As late as December, Goldman CEO David Solomon described Ruemmler as an “excellent lawyer” and said she had his full faith and backing.
This article was first published in The Conversation UK’s World Affairs Briefing email. Sign up to receive weekly analysis of the latest developments in international relations, direct to your inbox.
Before he sent his war machine into Ukraine nearly four years ago, the Russian president, Vladimir Putin, talked of the need to rid the country of the “neo-Nazi cabal” which was holding it hostage and perpetrating a “genocide” of Russian speakers in eastern Ukraine.
Putin has doubled down on this regularly during the conflict, refusing to recognise Ukraine’s sitting president, Volodymyr Zelensky, as a legitimate negotiating partner and repeatedly calling for elections. He seems to have found a receptive ear in Donald Trump, who has repeated this call several times, usually after a phone chat with the Russian leader.
Now it’s being reported that Zelensky is planning for elections and a referendum on the Trump peace proposal, after the US insisted he do both by May 15 or lose US security guarantees. Zelensky has repeatedly pointed out that the Ukrainian constitution bars elections while martial law is in effect.
Advertisement
It’s easy to see why. As it stands, 20% of Ukraine’s territory is occupied by Russia. Do the people living on that land get a vote? How about the millions of displaced people – either in Ukraine or in the enforced diaspora? How to organise ballots for the hundreds of thousands of troops on active duty? The logistics are mind-boggling.
But it’s not just logistics. Stefan Wolff, an expert in international security at the University of Birmingham, and Tetyana Malyarenko of the University of Odesa present five reasons why holding a poll and referendum are a problem, given the present circumstances.
On the face of it, they argue, it feels as if the US president is once again coming up with a plan that favours Russia over Ukraine. But given the impossibility of organising these votes under the present circumstances, let alone providing for what would happen if, as seems likely, the people vote for Zelensky and against the Trump peace deal, this might actually play into the hands of Kyiv and its allies. Apart from anything else, the process will buy them some time to come up with a new strategy that will take into account Washington’s role as the most unreliable of partners.
Having said that, the phrase “if the people vote for Zelensky” is doing some heavy lifting here. The fact is that, four years into an existential struggle, Ukrainians are exhausted and morale is taking a beating in the face of relentless Russian bombardment. Zelensky, who was voted into power with 74% of the vote in 2019 on a platform of fighting corruption has seen some of his closest political allies embroiled in massive corruption scandals.
The fact that the most recent scandal, which saw his chief of staff resign, related to allegations of graft involving Ukraine’s biggest energy supplier was particularly damaging, given that many Ukrainians are living without power in the coldest winter in a decade, thanks to Russian bombing.
So Zelensky’s reelection is not a foregone conclusion. In fact, two of his close associates – Valerii Zaluzhnyi, the former chief of Ukraine’s armed forces and now ambassador to the US, and Kyrylo Budanov, who the Ukrainian president recently appointed as his chief of staff – would both be popular candidates. Neither has said they would run for office, but what politician ever does say that – until they do?
Jennifer Mathers, an expert in Russian and eastern European politics at Aberystwyth University, takes us through the possible challengers.
To Washington, where members of Congress have started to sift through some of the 3 million documents from the “Epstein files” released by the Department of Justice at the end of January. Observers have commented that, unlike in Europe, where the fallout has included considerable political splashback for some important people, reaction in the US – so far at least – has been comparatively muted.
Of course, the unredacted files have only just been made available to US lawmakers. So it’s hard to gauge how people are going to react when big names begin to be linked with sleazy acts – whether that might be sexual, political or business-related.
Releasing the files is a gamble for the US Department of Justice and the attorney-general, Pam Bondi, writes Katie Pruszynski, an analyst of US politics at the University of Sheffield. While the potential for scandal is huge, the US public is having to digest so many other stories. This year alone, the US has conducted a raid on Venezuela and abducted its president. There have been threats against Greenland and Canada. The activities of ICE and other immigration agencies in US cities, particularly in Minneapolis where two people have been shot dead, have also rightly dominated headlines.
Advertisement
US attorney-general, Pam Bondi, testifies before a House Judiciary Committee oversight hearing as Epstein survivors look on. AP Photo/Tom Brenner
On top of that, millions of people have seen their health insurance premiums skyrocket after the subsidies established under Obamacare lapsed on January 1. People may simply not have the mental bandwidth to take it all in.
But all this might change once the unredacted files are made public. The key thing Republicans will be hoping for is that any furore surrounding the Epstein scandal will die down before the midterm elections in November.
Meanwhile, as Pruszynski notes, Epstein’s victims – many of whose names were not redacted, despite the US Congress passing a law to that effect – are still waiting for justice.
The release of victims’ names raises an interesting side issue: who decides what information is released and what is redacted? Matthew Mokhefi-Ashton explains the competing legal principles which balance the public’s right to know with people’s right to privacy.
When the US secretary of state, Marco Rubio, was taking questions after the raid on Caracas on January 3, he appeared to relish the idea of the US turning its attention to Cuba, commenting that: “If I lived in Havana, and I was in the government, I’d be concerned – at least a little bit.” His boss appeared to rule out direct intervention, at least for now, saying: “Cuba is ready to fall … I don’t think we need any action. Looks like it’s going down. It’s going down for the count.”
He may not be far off the mark, given that Cuba is fast running out of oil. The situation there is so parlous that at least one air carrier, Air Canada, has cancelled all flights to Cuba because it can’t be sure that its aircraft would be able to refuel. This is a disaster. Cuba is heavily dependent on tourism for the foreign currency is so desperately needs.
Advertisement
Since Trump returned to power a year ago, the US has made it nigh on impossible for Cuba to source enough fuel to meet its energy needs. Now he is essentially saying the communist government of Miguel Díaz-Canel must negotiate a deal (on American terms) or else.
But whatever Rubio, who has nursed a career-long obsession with his parents’ home country of Cuba, may want to see, achieving regime change on the Caribbean island will not be easy, writes Nicolas Forsans of University of Essex. Forsans sketches out what a US deal with Cuba that falls short of replacing the government might look like.
Sign up to receive our weekly World Affairs Briefing newsletter from The Conversation UK. Every Thursday we’ll bring you expert analysis of the big stories in international relations.
The Driver and Vehicle Licensing Agency has urged motorists to do this online
Fiona Callingham Lifestyle writer
22:06, 12 Feb 2026
Motorists are being reminded to complete an essential online procedure “now”. Neglecting to do so could land you with a penalty of up to £1,000.
The Driver and Vehicle Licensing Agency (DVLA) has used the social media platform X to remind motorists to tax their vehicles. Vehicle tax, commonly known as car tax or road tax, is a mandatory levy for operating a motor vehicle on Britain’s public highways.
Advertisement
The revenue collected is allocated towards infrastructure enhancements, including the upkeep and restoration of roads. Motorists can choose to settle this obligation annually or through monthly instalments.
Failure to pay your vehicle tax will result in a penalty, which can rise to as much as £1,000 should the case proceed to court. Additionally, your vehicle risks being clamped or impounded if it remains untaxed whilst parked on public highways.
On X, the DVLA stated: “You can tax your vehicle online 24 hours a day, seven days a week on http://gov.uk/dvla/tax. Do it now. #TaxItDontRiskIt #DVLADigital”.
How to tax your vehicle
To tax your vehicle, you will need a reference number from either:
Advertisement
A recent reminder or a “last chance” notification letter issued by DVLA regarding vehicle tax
Your vehicle log book (V5C) which should be registered in your name
The green “new keeper” portion of the log book if the vehicle has been newly acquired If you cannot find these documents, you’ll need to request a replacement log book
Tax payments can be made using debit or credit card, or by setting up a direct debit
Exempt vehicles
Certain vehicles don’t have to pay tax. Nevertheless, you’re still required to register your vehicle for tax even though no payment is needed.
The DVLA’s website states: “You must tax your vehicle even if you do not have to pay anything, for example if you’re exempt because you’re disabled.”
If you don’t tax your vehicle, you’ll receive an out-of-court settlement (OCS) letter. The fee is set at £30 plus one and a half times the outstanding vehicle tax sum.
Not paying the OCS could see the case taken to a magistrates’ court as a criminal matter, with fines reaching either £1,000 or five times the taxable sum, whichever is greater. Your vehicle might also be clamped, possibly resulting in additional fees. But some vehicles don’t have to make this payment.
If your car is used by a disabled person, you can claim the disability exemption when taxing your vehicle. Evidence of eligibility for the disability exemption will be needed.
Advertisement
The DVLA explains: “You can remove an exemption from a vehicle if it’s no longer being used by a disabled person. You can only use your exemption on one vehicle at a time. If you have more than one vehicle, you’ll need to choose which one will be exempt from vehicle tax.”
Vehicles used by organisations offering transport services for disabled people are also tax-exempt, although this doesn’t include ambulances.
Classic vehicles, specifically those built before 1 January 1985, are not liable for vehicle tax. Owners can verify their vehicle’s eligibility on the Government website.
Other vehicles that don’t have to pay tax include:
Advertisement
Mobility scooters and powered wheelchairs with a maximum speed of 8mph on roads and 4mph on pavements
Lawn mowers
Steam-powered vehicles
Tractors
Agricultural engines
Light agricultural vehicles used off-road
“Limited use” vehicles making short journeys (no more than 1.5km) on public roads between land owned by the same person
Electric heavy goods vehicles
For further details, visit the Government website here.
With the noise around Arsenal and their history under Arteta when trying to win the title, the Gunners boss was asked if he needs to ensure that his side do not panic and remain focused on their task.
“That’s what we have to do,” he said. “I mean we are going to be willing and preparing to win every single match and the only thing that we can do is focus on that and raise the levels collectively and individually to be better than the opponent every week.
“It’s just the things that we have to do, that’s the most important thing.”
But after Erling Haaland’s late penalty to secure the three points and their win against Fulham on Wednesday, the gap was reduced to three points and the pressure was put back on to the Gunners.
When asked if playing after City is bringing a new pressure to his team, Arteta said: “I don’t think so, I think we played well after them a few times this season and we have won games.”
Of the 17 games in which Arsenal have scored first in the Premier League this season, the draw at Brentford was just the second time they have failed to win, along with their loss to Manchester United in January.
Midfielder Declan Rice could not have put it better: “This is a rollercoaster of a season.
Advertisement
“You can’t be naive to think this is going to be easy. We are playing against the best teams week in, week out. We have to keep pushing and believing in ourselves, controlling the controllables.
“We have to block out the outside noise. We have done that really well. People are going to talk up the title race and Arsenal but we have a really calm group.”