Connect with us

NewsBeat

Surgery patients without pain meds, urine-filled bed pans left out and abuse concerns amid staffing crisis at major Greater Manchester hospital

Published

on

Manchester Evening News

Surgery patients have left been unprotected against ‘abuse’, and others are so used to delays that they have stopped asking for help at one of the country’s biggest NHS trusts, shocking inspection findings have revealed. Helena Vesty reports.

Patients have been left in pain, while others stopped asking for help after facing delays to their care amid shocking staffing shortages at one of Greater Manchester’s major hospitals.

Advertisement

Surgical services at Salford Royal Hospital have been served with a warning notice by health inspectors after they found patients were at risk of abuse and that bottles and bed pans of urine were left to accumulate in ward bathrooms, with staff short on time to clear them.

Surgical services have now been rated as ‘requires improvement’ by health watchdog the Care Quality Commission (CQC). It follows an inspection from September 23 to 25. The visit was carried out ‘due to concerns regarding how gynaecology, spinal and neurosurgery services are managed, as well as to look at their safety processes’.

Try MEN Premium NOW for just £1

The latest review came after the CQC found regulatory breaches at a previous inspection. ‘Most of these remained a concern at this latest inspection’, inspectors said.

Advertisement

In shocking findings, inspectors discovered that ‘some aspects of the service were not always safe’, and ‘there was an increased risk that people could be harmed’.

Inspectors said staff didn’t always make sure patients weren’t protected ‘from abuse or improper treatment’; patients weren’t told about their rights around consent didn’t have their rights respected during care and treatment; and that ‘staff didn’t always complete risk assessments or appropriately manage people’s deteriorating health to keep people safe’.

There were also concerns that patients were left waiting for pain relief and support with their personal care. During the inspection, four people on one ward told the watchdog that they ‘experienced extended pain symptoms and had experienced delays in receiving pain relief medicines’. Staff told the CQC that multiple patients had experienced delays in receiving post-operative pain relief.

Staff told inspectors patients ‘would leave their individually-labelled bed pans or bottles in the bathroom for staff to collect when they had time’. That leads to a ‘risk this could lead to inaccurate recording of fluids as the bed pans and bottles absorbed some of the liquid’, the watchdog said.

Advertisement

Results published today (Friday, February 13) show the CQC has issued a warning notice to the Northern Care Alliance NHS Foundation Trust (NCA), which runs Salford Royal. The warning notice highlights the areas where ‘rapid and significant improvements’ are needed.

The official warning means the CQC can take further action if improvements aren’t made within a short period of time, including recommending that the services be taken over by another body, called ‘special administration’.

Major improvements being urged in the warning notice include ‘staffing levels, as well as systems and processes used to identify and manage risks, which were affecting quality and safety on the wards’, the watchdog said.

Have you been affected by this story? Email helena.vesty@reachplc.com

Advertisement

Inspectors found wards did not have enough staff with the right qualifications to deal with patients. Patients ‘felt staffing shortages had impacted their emotional well-being and they didn’t always feel comfortable asking for help when they needed it, due to experiencing previous delays, especially during the night’, the CQC has said.

The report reads: “Most people told us the surgical wards did not have enough nursing and support staff… We spoke with people on some surgical wards who experienced delays in receiving pain relief and support with their personal care needs.

“People who used the service were not always safeguarded in the surgical wards. Formal duty of candour was not always undertaken in a timely way in accordance with trust policies.”

In addition to the concerns in the warning notice, inspectors found some 11 regulatory breaches relating to safeguarding people from abuse and improper treatment, as well as duty of candour.

Advertisement

These breaches were also regarding ‘person-centred care, safe care and treatment, good management of the service and staffing’, which had already been identified as problems at the last inspection in December 2022.

Inspectors found that surgical staff are supposed to formally identify a patient’s loved one if and when things go wrong within 27 hours, but no later than 10 days after the incident. Records showed that staff only told the relevant contact within 10 days just over two-thirds (68 per cent) of the time in one division of the surgical services.

The report continues: “The general environment in some surgical wards was aged and worn…

“Staff were not always trained to provide safe care. The surgical services reported that only 18.3 per cent of eligible staff had completed dementia awareness training during the past three years. The proportion of staff that had completed life support training was below trust targets.

Advertisement

“The services did not always manage infection prevention and control risks well. Staff compliance with hand hygiene standards and admission screening processes was consistently below trust standards. The services did not always make sure that medicines and treatments were safe and met people’s needs, capacities and preferences.”

The trust responded to the report saying improvements are now underway, including increasing staffing across surgical wards, with nine additional working-time equivalent registered nurses in post between September and January, and strengthened senior nursing presence during late, weekend and twilight shifts.

NCA chief nursing officer, Juliette Cosgrove said: “We know we haven’t always got things right and still have work to do to improve. We have been working closely with the CQC since their inspection in September 2025, alongside NHS England and our partner organisations to make improvements as quickly and openly as possible.

“Our colleagues are crucial to this process, and we’ve spent time listening and making sure they have the chance to share their views on what we can do to make things better.”

Advertisement

Inspectors identified that there were plans to improve equipment servicing and maintenance, and that staff understood how to identify and manage sepsis.

The watchdog also found that leaders engaged with partners and the wider community to plan and improve services, and that the service supported people to live healthier lives and where possible, reduced their future needs for care and support.

Northern Care Alliance Foundation Trust covers a population of one million across its four hospitals – Salford Royal, The Royal Oldham Hospital, Fairfield General Hospital in Bury, and Rochdale Infirmary.

The hospital is also the regional centre for major trauma, neurosurgery, and upper gastrointestinal and bariatric care. It is also a centre for complex spinal care and intestinal failure. The surgical services had 15,400 attendances between October 2024 and September 2025.

Advertisement

After the latest inspection, the CQC has again rated how safe, effective, responsive and well-led the surgery services are as requiring improvement. How caring the service is has declined from good to requires improvement. The overall rating for Salford Royal Hospital and the NCA has not changed, and stands at requires improvement.

Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

NewsBeat

Debbie Todd to hold exhibition at Bishop Auckland Town Hall

Published

on

Debbie Todd to hold exhibition at Bishop Auckland Town Hall

Debbie Todd, a socially engaged portrait photographer based between Stanley and Consett, will present her debut solo exhibition at Bishop Auckland Town Hall in a show specially commissioned for the venue.

The exhibition, which runs from Monday (February 16) to May 15, brings together two bodies of work exploring identity, inclusion and belonging.

Debbie Todd (Image: Debbie Todd)

Ms Todd said: “The work shown at Bishop Auckland is rooted in proverbs and idioms that shape perceptions of people with different conditions, identities and lifestyles.

“By pairing imagery with language, the series encourages audiences to reflect on how everyday phrases can impact individuals and communities.

Advertisement

“The portraits represent people often misunderstood or excluded from mainstream media, offering space for recognition, understanding and inclusion.

Debbie Todd’s first solo show is at Bishop Auckland Town Hall (Image: Debbie Todd)

“This being my first solo show, I’m proud to share the work in a space that’s accessible to everyone.”

One of the featured works, The Meaning of Being Different, will be displayed on a large wall in the library and delves into identity, difference and the sense of belonging.

The second, titled Extra Ordinary, will be installed in the historic Strong Room.

Advertisement

Debbie Todd’s ‘Jimmy sat on a gate at Appleby Horse Fair’ was shortlisted for the British Journal of Photography’s prestigious Portrait of Brit (Image: Debbie Todd)

Timed to coincide with Down Syndrome Awareness Day on March 21, this piece highlights themes of disability, visibility and inclusion.

Ms Todd’s photographic practice champions equality through a fine-art style and close collaboration with marginalised communities.

Her aim is to foster empathy, inclusion and fair representation.

Debbie Todd’s photography explores identity, difference and belonging (Image: Debbie Todd)

A graduate of The Northern School of Art, she began her studies at the age of 38, earning a first-class honours degree in Photographic Practice in 2022, followed by a distinction in her MA in Arts Practice in 2023.

Advertisement

During her studies, Ms Todd won the Anjool Malde Award, was shortlisted for the Association of Photographers Student Awards and received the Judges’ Choice Award in the student category at the Bar-Tur Photo Awards.

‘Keep your nose clean’ Angela, Autoimmune (Medium) (Image: Debbie Todd)

She attended the awards exhibition in Berlin in 2023.

Her work has been shown at the Metrocentre, published as a book, and commissioned by MIMA for a 2025 exhibition.

She was also part of The Late Shows in Newcastle.

Advertisement

She was also shortlisted for the most recent British Journal of Photography’s prestigious Portrait of Britain Awards, with her image Jimmy sat on a gate at Appleby Horse Fair appearing in Portrait of Britain, Volume 8.

‘Lose your marbles’ Kirsty, Bipolar Disorder by Debbie Todd (Image: Debbie Todd)

She has also been shortlisted for the London Camera Exchange Photographer Awards for the third consecutive year and is in the running for the Photography Foundation Awards.

In addition to her photography, Ms Todd works in the care sector, supporting people with disabilities and looked-after children.

She also volunteers for Remember My Baby.

Advertisement

Her debut solo exhibition at Bishop Auckland Town Hall is free and open to the public, running from Monday to Saturday between 10am and 4pm.

More information about The Northern School of Art’s creative courses can be found on its website.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

NewsBeat

How to Get to Heaven From Belfast ending explained from Greta to the pink bag

Published

on

Daily Mirror

Netflix’s How to Get to Heaven From Belfast has just been released with a finale full of twists – here’s everything that happened and what we know about that mysterious pink bag

Warning – this article contains major spoilers for How to Get to Heaven From Belfast.

Advertisement

Netflix’s fresh murder mystery series trails three women on a hazardous quest across Ireland to unravel the mystery surrounding their enigmatic friend, Greta (portrayed by Natasha O’Keeffe).

Over eight episodes, stressed TV writer Saoirse (Roisin Gallagher), fiery mother Robyn (Sinéad Keenan), and awkward, religious Dara (Caoilfhionn Dunne) unearth secrets, pursue leads and theories, and grapple with a distressing event from their past to discover the truth.

From the creator of Derry Girls, Lisa McGee, the new series was launched this Thursday (12th February) and has already garnered glowing reviews from critics, who are hailing the comedy thriller as a must-see.

But what exactly transpired with Greta and have the trio managed to reveal a satisfying resolution to this captivating mystery?, reports Belfast Live.

Advertisement

Here is your crucial deep dive into everything that gets unveiled in the new series’ final episode.

How to Get to Heaven From Belfast ending explained.

As the series unfolds, it’s disclosed that Greta is actually alive but is fleeing after inadvertently killing her childhood friend, Jodie.

The two girls had been mistreated by their parents as children in their town of Heaven’s Veil, where they set the church ablaze, unintentionally causing the deaths of those inside.

Advertisement

Journalist Charles Sampson, also known as Jason Meadows (Josh Finan) by Greta, picked up their trail and followed Greta and Jodie hoping to uncover the truth. However, Jodie fatally stabbed him, leaving Greta to bury the body with assistance from young Saoirse, Robyn and Dara.

In the present day, Greta’s body is switched with Jodie’s and Greta connects with fixer Booker (Bronagh Gallagher) and a young woman named Feeney (Saoirse-Monica Jackson) to erase her paper trail and establish a fresh life beyond Ireland.

The scheme was also arranged by Greta’s mother, Margo (Michelle Fairley), and husband Owen (Emmett J. Scanlan), but Greta has second thoughts and drugs Feeney to flee and return to Heaven’s Veil to face her past.

Advertisement

It’s there that she uncovers her biological mother is actually a woman named Nora, who sold her as a child. Later, she reunites with Saoirse, Robyn and Dara as well as Owen and their daughter, Maria (Matilda Freeman).

Booker is instructed to kill Greta, but, after uncovering the secret organisation she was part of that was initially founded to help liberate women was corrupt, she, along with Feeney and another member known as the midwife (Shauna Bray), eliminate the rest of the society and let Greta go free, pledging to launch a new organisation that will uphold its values.

Advertisement

Saoirse, Robyn and Dara confess to Liam (Darragh Hand) and Charles’ son, Andrew (also Finan), who let them go free without pressing any charges.

**For the latest showbiz, TV, movie and streaming news, go to the new **Everything Gossip** website**

But what was in the bag?

One of the most intriguing puzzles looming over the finale centres on a mysterious pink bag the girls retrieve from Greta.

Advertisement

Earlier in the series, she’d hitched a lift with Conrad, the bag’s original owner, who drives Greta deep into woodland to meet an enigmatic group of individuals. It’s also disclosed that Conrad was murdered with a screwdriver to the neck, though the killer remains unidentified.

In the episode’s closing moments, Saoirse, Robyn and Dara are left clutching the bag and, after peering inside, they pledge not to get involved.

Whilst the contents aren’t disclosed to viewers, creator McGee exclusively told Reach that she knows what’s inside – though she hasn’t ruled out having a rethink.

Get Netflix free with Sky for Bridgerton Season 4

This article contains affiliate links, we will receive a commission on any sales we generate from it. Learn more
The season 4 Bridgerton premiere was held in Paris last night

from £15

Sky

Get the deal here

‘Dearest gentle reader’, as the fourth season of Bridgerton follows second son Benedict love story, there’s a way to watch this fairytale-like season for less.

Sky is giving away a free Netflix subscription with its new Sky Stream TV bundles, including the £15 Essential TV plan. This lets customers watch live and on-demand TV content without a satellite dish or aerial and includes the new season of Bridgerton.

Advertisement

“I know right now what’s in the bag,” she teased. “But I’m not saying I might not change my mind, which is why I left it so vague.

“I have a very clear idea of what it is, but if I think of something that works better or that might be more interesting when I start to write season two, I want to be able to change my mind.”

Netflix has not yet confirmed whether the series will be returning, so stay tuned for updates as the streamer evaluates its popularity over the coming weeks.

How to Get to Heaven From Belfast is available to stream on Netflix.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

NewsBeat

Councillors reject ‘unustified’ Cayton caravan plan

Published

on

Councillors reject ‘unustified’ Cayton caravan plan

​David Swiers’ proposal to erect a caravan lodge to provide housing for an agricultural worker has been refused due to a lack of evidence and justification for the proposal at Chelson Fields, Killerby, Scarborough.

​The applicant said the accommodation was needed for the security of the site and welfare of the livestock, but officers who conducted a site visit said they found “no evidence of this livestock” except for four alpacas, three sheep, two ponies, and one chicken.

​The agent for the application had requested a deferral of the decision citing “errors” in the planning report and stating that additional information would be submitted.

Advertisement

​Cllr Derek Bastiman said: “I would have thought that if the agent or the applicant knew there were errors within the report, then they would have been here today to point those errors out.”

​No public speakers attended the meeting on Thursday, February 12, and officers said that the agent had not specified what they believed the errors to be.

​“There is no justification for the siting of the caravan and agricultural dwelling on the site based on the needs of the existing operations or the operations set out in the supporting information,” an officer told the committee.

​He added: “It has not been demonstrated that the proposed development is essential to farming, the plan could negatively affect the landscape, and no information has been provided regarding biodiversity net gain based on the existing site.

Advertisement

​“No additional information can be submitted that would overcome the first and second basis for refusal.”

​Speaking at the meeting, Cllr Subash Sharma said: “I see no signs of any agricultural activity taking place and I think the viability aspect is important, inasmuch as the minimum requirement is that somebody must be able to earn a full-time wage from it.”

​He told colleagues: “Since there isn’t any agricultural activity taking place, I don’t see how that can happen.

​“I don’t understand the basis of this application, and I think, should it ever be represented, we would need to see some viability to show that it’s feasible to employ a full-time worker to be there, and necessary for a 24-hour operation to require it.

Advertisement

​“None of that is available to us, and there’s nothing to indicate that anything like that has taken place.”

​Officers also noted that planning permission for the siting of a caravan for three years had been approved in 2016 to “allow the agricultural enterprise to be developed and to allow the information to be collected to demonstrate the case for a plan”.

​However, they said that “no evidence has been submitted with the current application to demonstrate that the agricultural enterprise exists, or if it does, that it is currently economically viable.”

​Councillors voted to reject the application with five votes in favour and one against.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

NewsBeat

Liberal Democrats and Tories to gather in York and Harrogate

Published

on

Liberal Democrats and Tories to gather in York and Harrogate

In York, the Liberal Democrats will be gathering at the Barbican Centre from Friday March 17th to Sunday March 19.

The party, led by Ed Davey, return to the site of their 2024 conference, after spending last Spring in Harrogate.

Here, the Conservative Party will be staging its Spring Conference at the Harrogate Convention Centre, which runs from Friday March 6 to Sunday March 8, with some 8,000 delegates expected.

RECOMMENDED READING:

Advertisement

The Liberal Democrats have already published its agenda, which will include a speech from Party leader Ed Davey on the Sunday as well as a Q&A session earlier in the event.

Ed Davey will be in York next month at the Spring Conference of the Liberal Democrats. (Image: PA)

Caron Lindsay, editor of the Liberal Democrat Voice told party supporters on her website: “You can go to debates on access to driving lessons, preserving trial by jury, revitalising town centres, universities, mental health, Donald Trump and Council finance.

“There are speeches from MPs Anna Sabine and James MacCleary and Watford Mayor Peter Taylor, as well as Ed, of course.

“You can help shape future policy by going to consultative sessions on international security, primary healthcare and defending democracy.”

Advertisement

The Barbican in York will be hosting the Liberal Democrats again. (Image: Pic supplied)

The Conservative Party has yet to produce its agenda for the Harrogate conference, which is its biggest event outside the autumn conference.

The October event was in Manchester and was organised last year by Stewart Harper, the president of the National Conservative Convention.

Mr Harper has now written on the Tory-supporting website Conservative home what next month’s event promises.

He said: “Spring Conference brings together activists, councillors, candidates and volunteers from across the country for a weekend focused on ideas, skills and connection.”

Advertisement

The Harrogate Convention Centre is hosting the Conservative Party next month. (Image: Pic supplied)

“Delivered in partnership with the Campaign Academy and the Conservative Councillors’ Association, the programme is designed to be practical and engaging. And unapologetically optimistic about the Party’s future.

“And it’s an opportunity to socialise together too – including with a members’ dinner on Saturday night – meeting up with friends and colleagues from across the country.”

He continued: “Our Spring Conference offers members a valuable opportunity to hear directly from senior figures within the Party, including the most senior members of the Shadow Cabinet, and to gain first-hand insight into a growing and evolving renewal programme.”

“It is a chance for every Party Member to engage – not through headlines or soundbites, but through thoughtful discussion and shared experience.”

Advertisement

Mr Harper added: “Harrogate offers the perfect blend of elegant spa-town charm, Yorkshire hospitality and some pretty decent venues, making it an inspiring and welcoming place to come together.”

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

NewsBeat

Man United latest: Marcus Rashford return backed as Sir Jim Ratcliffe puts out statement

Published

on

Manchester Evening News

Manchester United aren’t in action this weekend but that hasn’t stopped the club dominating headlines off the pitch

While their Premier League counterparts gear up for FA Cup fourth round fixtures, Manchester United enjoy a weekend break to rest and recuperate. United were knocked out by Brighton at the first hurdle in the previous round, leaving the league as their sole remaining priority after failing to qualify for Europe and suffering an early Carabao Cup exit.

Advertisement

Michael Carrick’s side won’t be back in action until February 23, when they face Everton. By the time that Monday night kick-off gets underway, they could be out of the Champions League places, with Chelsea and Liverpool breathing down their necks.

Interim boss Carrick wasn’t backed in the transfer market during the winter window, having only been appointed in January after Ruben Amorim’s departure. Regardless of whether Carrick or someone else is in the dugout next term, speculation abounds regarding potential ins and outs.

Off the field, recent remarks from part-owner Sir Jim Ratcliffe have also sparked debate. Here are our latest headlines from Old Trafford.

Ensure our latest sport headlines always appear at the top of your Google Search by making us a Preferred Source. Click here to activate or add us as Preferred Source in your Google search settings

Advertisement

Rashford comeback supported

Ex-Manchester United coach Rene Meulensteen reckons Marcus Rashford’s Old Trafford journey might not be finished. Rashford spent time on loan at Aston Villa last season and is currently on a season-long arrangement with Barcelona.

The Catalan giants hold an option to make the move permanent for just over £26million at the end of the season if they are happy with Rashford’s output. Nevertheless, Meulensteen hasn’t dismissed the possibility of the academy product returning now that Carrick – previously an on-field colleague of the forward – is at the helm.

“It could be a route back for Marcus Rashford at Man Utd, definitely,” Meulensteen told BetGoat. “I think Marcus is still as ‘red’ as anyone because he came through the ranks as a young kid, and that will never go away, that will never leave him.

Advertisement

“It’s the same with Scott McTominay. Both players have done extremely well wherever they’ve gone. But I think it was good for Marcus to have that spell away, first of all at Aston Villa, but now at Barcelona. It’s a different culture, a different language, and a different style. Every week is different.

“The Premier League is different. It’s so much more demanding than any league in the world. And I think he’s enjoying his football, and that’s the most important thing. He needs to enjoy his football.”

Ratcliffe addresses backlash to comments

Sir Jim Ratcliffe faced widespread criticism following remarks in which he suggested the UK was being ‘colonised’ by immigrants. Supporter group The 1958 were amongst those who challenged the co-owner, who has now released a subsequent statement regarding his comments.

“I am sorry that my choice of language has offended some people in the UK and Europe and caused concern but it is important to raise the issue of controlled and well-managed immigration that supports economic growth,” Ratcliffe said in a statement shared on Thursday. “My comments were made while answering questions about UK policy at the European Industry Summit in Antwerp, where I was discussing the importance of economic growth, jobs, skills and manufacturing in the UK.

“My intention was to stress that governments must manage migration alongside investment in skills, industry and jobs so that long-term prosperity is shared by everyone. It is critical that we maintain an open debate on the challenges facing the UK.”

Previously, Greater Manchester Mayor Andy Burnham had criticised Ratcliffe, saying: “These comments go against everything for which Manchester has traditionally stood: a place where people of all races and faiths have pulled together over centuries to build our city and our institutions – including Manchester United FC.”

FOLLOW OUR MAN UNITED FB PAGE! Latest news and analysis via the MEN’s Manchester United Facebook page

Advertisement

Sky Sports discounted Premier League and EFL package

This article contains affiliate links, we will receive a commission on any sales we generate from it. Learn more
Content Image

£49

£35

Sky

Get Sky Sports here

Sky has slashed the price of its Essential TV and Sky Sports bundle for the 2025/26 season, saving members £336 and offering more than 1,400 live matches across the Premier League, EFL and more.

Advertisement

Sky will show at least 215 live Premier League games this season, an increase of up to 100 more.

Source link

Continue Reading

NewsBeat

EPA revokes a key legal underpinning in fighting climate change

Published

on

EPA revokes a key legal underpinning in fighting climate change

WASHINGTON (AP) — The Trump administration on Thursday revoked a scientific finding that long has been the central basis for U.S. action to regulate greenhouse gas emissions and fight climate change, the most aggressive move by the Republican president to roll back climate regulations.

The rule finalized by the Environmental Protection Agency rescinds a 2009 government declaration known as the endangerment finding that determined that carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases threaten public health and welfare. The Obama-era finding is the legal underpinning of nearly all climate regulations under the Clean Air Act for motor vehicles, power plants and other pollution sources that are heating the planet.

The repeal eliminates all greenhouse gas emissions standards for cars and trucks and could unleash a broader undoing of climate regulations on stationary sources such as power plants and oil and gas facilities, experts say. Legal challenges are near certain.

President Donald Trump called the move “the single largest deregulatory action in American history, by far,” while EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin called the endangerment finding “the Holy Grail of federal regulatory overreach.”

Advertisement

Trump called the endangerment finding “one of the greatest scams in history,” claiming falsely that it “had no basis in fact” or law. “On the contrary, over the generations, fossil fuels have saved millions of lives and lifted billions of people out of poverty all over the world,” Trump said at a White House ceremony, although scientists across the globe agree that carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases are driving catastrophic heat waves and storms, droughts and sea level rise.

Environmental groups described the move as the single biggest attack in U.S. history against federal authority to address climate change. Evidence backing up the endangerment finding has only grown stronger in the 17 years since it was approved, they said.

“This action will only lead to more climate pollution, and that will lead to higher costs and real harms for American families,” said Fred Krupp, president of Environmental Defense Fund, adding that the consequences would be felt on Americans’ health, property values, water supply and more.

The EPA also said it will propose a two-year delay to a Biden-era rule restricting greenhouse gas emissions by cars and light trucks. And the agency will end incentives for automakers who install automatic start-stop ignition systems in their vehicles. The device is intended to reduce emissions, but Zeldin said “everyone hates” it.

Advertisement

Zeldin, a former Republican congressman who was tapped by Trump to lead EPA last year, has criticized his predecessors in Democratic administrations, saying that in the name of tackling climate change, they were “willing to bankrupt the country.”

The endangerment finding “led to trillions of dollars in regulations that strangled entire sectors of the United States economy, including the American auto industry,” Zeldin said. “The Obama and Biden administrations used it to steamroll into existence a left-wing wish list of costly climate policies, electric vehicle mandates and other requirements that assaulted consumer choice and affordability.”

The endangerment finding and the regulations based on it “didn’t just regulate emissions, it regulated and targeted the American dream. And now the endangerment finding is hereby eliminated,” Zeldin said.

Supreme Court has upheld the endangerment finding

The Supreme Court ruled in a 2007 case that planet-warming greenhouse gases, caused by the burning of oil and other fossil fuels, are air pollutants under the Clean Air Act.

Advertisement

Since the high court’s decision, in a case known as Massachusetts v. EPA, courts have uniformly rejected legal challenges to the endangerment finding, including a 2023 decision by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit.

The endangerment finding is widely considered the legal foundation that underpins a series of regulations intended to protect against threats made increasingly severe by climate change. That includes deadly floods, extreme heat waves, catastrophic wildfires and other natural disasters in the United States and around the world.

Gina McCarthy, a former EPA administrator who served as White House climate adviser in the Biden administration, called the Trump administration’s actions reckless. “This EPA would rather spend its time in court working for the fossil fuel industry than protecting us from pollution and the escalating impacts of climate change,” she said.

Former President Barack Obama said on X that repeal of the endangerment finding will make Americans “less safe, less healthy and less able to fight climate change — all so the fossil fuel industry can make even more money.”

Advertisement

Dr. Lisa Patel, a pediatrician and executive director of the Medical Society Consortium on Climate and Health, said Trump’s action “prioritizes the profits of big oil and gas companies and polluters over clean air and water” and children’s health.

“As a result of this repeal, I’m going to see more sick kids come into the Emergency Department having asthma attacks and more babies born prematurely,” she said in a statement. “My colleagues will see more heart attacks and cancer in their patients.”

David Doniger, a climate expert at the Natural Resources Defense Council, said Trump and Zeldin are trying to use repeal of the finding as a “kill shot’’ that would allow the administration to make nearly all climate regulations invalid. The repeal could erase current limits on greenhouse gas pollution from cars, factories, power plants and other sources and could hinder future administrations from imposing rules to address global warming.

The EPA action follows an executive order from Trump that directed the agency to submit a report on “the legality and continuing applicability” of the endangerment finding. Conservatives and some congressional Republicans have long sought to undo what they consider overly restrictive and economically damaging rules to limit greenhouse gases that cause global warming.

Advertisement

Withdrawing the endangerment finding “is the most important step taken by the Trump administration so far to return to energy and economic sanity,” said Myron Ebell, a conservative activist who has questioned the science behind climate change.

Tailpipe emission limits targeted

Zeldin and Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy have moved to drastically scale back limits on tailpipe emissions from cars and trucks. Rules imposed under Democratic President Joe Biden were intended to encourage U.S. automakers to build and sell more electric vehicles. The transportation sector is the largest source of greenhouse gas emissions in the U.S.

The Trump administration announced a proposal in December to weaken vehicle mileage rules for the auto industry, loosening regulatory pressure on automakers to control pollution from gasoline-powered cars and trucks. The EPA said its two-year delay to a Biden-era rule on greenhouse gas emissions by cars and light trucks will give the agency time to develop a plan that better reflects the reality of slower EV sales, while promoting consumer choice and lowering prices.

Environmental groups said the plan would keep polluting, gas-burning cars and trucks on U.S. roads for years to come, threatening the health of millions of Americans, particularly children and the elderly.

___

Advertisement

Follow the AP’s coverage of the Environmental Protection Agency at https://apnews.com/hub/us-environmental-protection-agency

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

NewsBeat

Nations League draw in full: England handed Spain reunion in tough group

Published

on

Nations League draw in full: England handed Spain reunion in tough group

World Cup-bound Scotland will play Switzerland, Slovenia and North Macedonia in Group B1 of the 2026/27 Nations League after their relegation from League A that followed a dismal play-off loss to Greece, while Wales face Portugal, Norway and Denmark in Group A4 after being promoted last time around.

Source link

Continue Reading

NewsBeat

it’s important to ask why politicians want to sort people into categories

Published

on

it’s important to ask why politicians want to sort people into categories

For Reform parliamentary candidate and former academic Matt Goodwin: “Englishness is an ethnicity that is deeply rooted in a people that can trace their roots back over generations.” By contrast, he argues, liberal progressives believe “anybody can be English as long as they sign a piece of paper and identify with Englishness.”

This is not a novel definition, and for some, it may be completely uncontroversial. It’s not surprising that some people living in England can trace their ancestors back many generations.

But attempting to define a particular “ethnicity” is also an attempt to determine who is (and who is not) part of a given group. Policing these boundaries has serious consequences.

The idea of essential groups

To speak of an identity as one that can be traced “back over generations”, is to speak of human reproduction and generational transmission. These are central ideas in how, historically, people have been categorised into racial groups.

Advertisement

The biological sciences have a long history of dividing humans up. Take 18th-century Swedish biologist Carl Linnaeus’s Systema Naturae, the most influential attempt to classify the natural world, and the basis of contemporary zoological nomenclature. Linnaeus subdivided humans into four varieties that many of us would balk at today and has no basis in modern science: white Europeans, reddish Americans, tawny Asians, and blackish Africans.

In the centuries since, the number of groups has changed, as well as the language used to describe them. But the idea that we can inherit some innate qualities via generational inheritance – essentialism – underwrites these influential ideas. Essentialism would have it that you’re born as part of a group and all the “identifying” in the world cannot change that.

These divisions can also generate a sense of entitlement to certain rights or resources for one group over another. They have been used to justify violence, discrimination – some of the most shameful moments in human history. Indeed, racial essentialism became so dangerous that Unesco published a series of statements to flag the dangers of the impulse to divide ourselves like this.

The limits of categories

The world is in a constant state of push and pull. People move or are moved, for all kinds of reasons all the time. They settle and reproduce in different places. This is an empirical truth that limits the utility of essentialist ideas.

Advertisement

Essentialist thinking requires us to say both where, and when, we are from. Some will find it quite straightforward to demonstrate membership of a particular group but others will not. Many of us won’t be able to say that all of our ancestors (as far back as history allows us to trace) were all born in England.

Dame Kelly Holmes was part of Gove’s discussion with Goodwin.
Alamy

Take Dame Kelly Holmes. She was one of the public figures Spectator editor Michael Gove mentioned when he interviewed Goodwin on this and other subjects. He asked: “Would you say that [she is] not really English?” Holmes is mixed race (a term that also leans on the idea of essential categories that somehow merge). She served in the army, won gold medals for England and Great Britain and received the honorific of Dame. But if only some of her “roots” can be traced “back over generations”, then does she not qualify as English?

Many of us will confound the groups that we are made to squeeze into because, ultimately, our roots long predate contemporary ideas of nation, identity and group.

Why do people invoke these ideas?

For me, what’s important here is not disproving the essential existence of groups, but trying to trace why they are being mobilised. Why do politicians want to define these categories?

Advertisement

Groups, identities and communities are made and remade. We come to feel a part of a collective. And this feeling is generated often in ways that seem somehow naturally occurring. We pray at the same place of worship; we listen to the same kinds of music. But our affiliations to particular groups do not exist in the wild.

Michael Gove interviews Matt Goodwin.

Categories have social power. When you define a collective, it makes it possible to speak to that collective and to mobilise it. Collectives can be delineated in more and less definitive ways. Essentialist thinking is some of the most definitive and inflexible of all. At its worst, those outside a group are denied access to respect and safety.

So, why distinguish between those who belong and those who do not? Why debate whether public figures with ancestors born elsewhere, but born and raised in England, are “actually” English? Why evoke (but not invoke) essentialised ideas of race, using words like ethnicity?

Advertisement

And if we know that cultivating boundaries of belonging can generate a sense of entitlement, then who risks being denied access, and to what? In a period of economic difficulty when public resources are already stretched, what is the next logical step after enough people can be made to agree on a clear definition of who is or is not English?

The essentialist claims we are hearing in the UK are not new, but they are powerful. So when politicians like Goodwin assert a desire to open a public debate on the categories they have selected – and even defined – we have to ask what purpose it serves.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

NewsBeat

Goldman Sachs’ top lawyer to resign after release of Epstein emails

Published

on

Goldman Sachs' top lawyer to resign after release of Epstein emails

NEW YORK (AP) — Kathy Ruemmler, the top lawyer at storied investment bank Goldman Sachs and former White House counsel to President Barack Obama, announced her resignation Thursday, after emails between her and Jeffrey Epstein showed a close relationship where she described him as an “older brother” and downplayed his sex crimes.

Ruemmler said in a statement that she would “step down as Chief Legal Officer and General Counsel of Goldman Sachs as of June 30, 2026.”

Up until her resignation, Ruemmler repeatedly tried to distance herself from the emails and other correspondence and had been defiant that she would not resign from Goldman’s top legal post, which she had held since 2020.

While Ruemmler has called Epstein a “monster” in recent statements, she had a much different relationship with Epstein before he was arrested a second time for sex crimes in 2019 and later killed himself in a Manhattan jail. Ruemmler called Epstein “Uncle Jeffrey” in emails and said she adored him.

Advertisement

In a statement before her resignation, a Goldman Sachs spokesperson said Ruemmler “regrets ever knowing him.”

In her statement Thursday, Ruemmler said: “Since I joined Goldman Sachs six years ago, it has been my privilege to help oversee the firm’s legal, reputational, and regulatory matters; to enhance our strong risk management processes; and to ensure that we live by our core value of integrity in everything we do. My responsibility is to put Goldman Sachs’ interests first.”

Goldman CEO David Solomonsaid in a separate statement: “As one of the most accomplished professionals in her field, Kathy has also been a mentor and friend to many of our people, and she will be missed. I accepted her resignation, and I respect her decision.”

During her time in private practice after she left the White House in 2014, Ruemmler received several expensive gifts from Epstein, including luxury handbags and a fur coat. The gifts were given after Epstein had already been convicted of sex crimes in 2008 and was registered as a sex offender.

Advertisement

“So lovely and thoughtful! Thank you to Uncle Jeffrey!!!” Ruemmler wrote to Epstein in 2018.

Historically, Wall Street frowns on gift-giving between clients and bankers or Wall Street lawyers, particularly high-end gifts that could pose a conflict of interest. Goldman Sachs requires its employees to get preapproval before receiving or giving gifts from clients, according to the company’s code of conduct, partly in order to not run afoul of anti-bribery laws.

As late as December, Goldman CEO David Solomon described Ruemmler as an “excellent lawyer” and said she had his full faith and backing.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

NewsBeat

The PS5 State of Play was filled with great games but too few were made by Sony

Published

on

The PS5 State of Play was filled with great games but too few were made by Sony
Kena: Scars Of Kosmora is published by Sony but they aren’t making it (Sony Interactive Entertainment)

GameCentral offers an overview of Thursday night’s State of Play and is disappointed at the lack of new first party game announcements.

Despite almost every State of Play, for the last several years, being a disappointment there was plenty of optimism left for the one on Thursday night, not least because it promised to be the longest one ever, outside of Sony’s not-E3 showcases.

Viewed from a distance it was very good, with a lot of exciting new games, but the one thing it was missing was anything new made by any of Sony’s internal, first party developers.

There weren’t many Sony published games of any kind but the few that were featured had either been announced previously or were made by external third party studios (well, technically we don’t know who’s making the God Of War remake trilogy but it’s unlikely to be Santa Monica Studio).

Advertisement

Without wanting to go over all ground all this stems from the fact that, a couple of years into the current generation, Sony suddenly got it into their heads that all their studios should pivot from primarily single-player games to making live service titles.

That proved to be a complete disaster and while it’s assumed that they’ve since reversed course they’ve never actually said so. Sony hardly talks about anything in the open anymore but while some optimists theorise that they have seen sense it takes at least five years to make a triple-A game and so there’s been chance yet for the change of plan – if it actually happened – to bear fruit.

Expert, exclusive gaming analysis

Sign up to the GameCentral newsletter for a unique take on the week in gaming, alongside the latest reviews and more. Delivered to your inbox every Saturday morning.

Advertisement

The PlayStation 5 is six years old this year and most Sony studios have only released one game on the console. Some, like Days Gone maker Bend Studio, haven’t made anything new for the format at all. Even Naughty Dog hasn’t produced anything but remakes and remasters so far.

We’ve currently no clue what Bluepoint Games, Team Asobi, Polyphony Digital, or Media Molecule are working on at the moment (you can guess but they’ve not announced anything). Even Santa Monica Studio is a mystery as they only seem to be overseeing the two new God Of War games and haven’t announced a new title themselves since 2022’s Ragnarök.

Advertisement

Any hope that Sony would allow a peek behind the curtain during the latest State of Play was quickly dashed, with the vast majority of games being third party. Sony is publishing some of these, such as Kena: Scars Of Kosmora – a sequel to 2021’s not very good Kena: Bridge Of Spirits – but they’re not made by any of their internal studios.

Sucker Punch did unveil free DLC for Ghost Of Yōtei, but while Marathon, Saros, and Marvel Tōkon: Fighting Souls (which is not made by an internal developer) all looked good they’d already been announced some time ago. So we really learnt very little about what Sony themselves are planning for the future.

At this point it seems clear there’s never going to be a big unveiling of multiple new first party titles. The E3 days of three or four new games being announced at once are gone and this State of Play was perhaps the final proof of that.

Advertisement

That leaves a gaping hole in the PlayStation 5’s armoury but the only thing to do is take solace in the third party games that were showcased instead.

The John Wick game looked promising and the tsunami of Konami announcements was great, even if we wish the new Castlevania game had been a bigger budget 3D title.

Advertisement

Legacy Of Kain: Defiance Remastered was a surprise, as was current gen remaster Dead Or Alive 6: Last Round. Control: Resonant looked great (non-humanoid enemies in a Remedy game, at last!), Crimson Moon seemed promising, and the Rayman remaster continues to seem a very strange idea – given it wasn’t very good even 30 years ago.

Yakoh Shinobi Ops appeared to be a cross between Tenchu and Shadow Tactics: Blades Of The Shogun and, like Krafton’s bizarre chicken monster game Project Windless, seems to be a self-imposed PlayStation console exclusive.

With new looks at Star Wars: Galactic Racer and 007 First Light as well it was a good State of Play, it’s just that there was very little about it that was exclusive to PlayStation and nothing that suggested Sony’s first party output is ever going to ramp up beyond just one or two new games a year.

Crimson Moon screenshot of the main character
Crimson Moon isn’t exclusive to PlayStation 5 (ProbablyMonsters)

Email gamecentral@metro.co.uk, leave a comment below, follow us on Twitter.

To submit Inbox letters and Reader’s Features more easily, without the need to send an email, just use our Submit Stuff page here.

Advertisement

For more stories like this, check our Gaming page.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2025