Crypto World
Bigger Blocks or STARK Proofs? Bitcoin’s Quantum Dilemma
ZK STARKs are the best way to deal with the issues created with making Bitcoin quantum-safe — and to reach mass adoption at the same time — says StarkWare co-founder Eli Ben-Sasson.
What’s more, he claims Blockstream founder Adam Back agrees.
Ben-Sasson has been in the news this week for his controversial suggestion on X to increase Bitcoin inflation to 4% annually. Grok’s analysis of the replies found “zero clear support for the proposal.”
But as the co-inventor of STARKs — quantum-secure, hash-based zero-knowledge proofs — he’s on much firmer ground, with some leading Bitcoin researchers supporting the concept.
Ben-Sasson’s own project Starknet last week announced its own three phase project to become quantum secure.
The problem of large PQ signatures on Bitcoin
Adding zero-knowledge proofs to Bitcoin does not make the blockchain quantum secure by itself. ZK proofs are a way to deal with the problems caused by adding much larger post-quantum (PQ) signature schemes to Bitcoin.
The current crop of PQ signatures approved by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) is 10 to 100 times larger than Bitcoin’s existing ECDSA and Schnorr signature schemes.
Some argue this could slow the blockchain to fewer than 1 transaction per second. But all of the large transaction signatures for a block could be compressed into a tiny ZK STARK proof. Because the proof would be much smaller than even including the existing signatures, the blockchain may end up running faster.
“If they don’t allow for ZK STARK aggregation, then definitely it will be a very unfortunate move because it won’t really solve the problem … where the problem is ‘can everyone actually use Bitcoin?’” Ben-Sasson said.
“So for that you need massive scale. And for that, you need things like signature aggregation and just increasing the block size isn’t enough.”
Related: StarkWare CEO suggests 4% annual Bitcoin inflation to replace 21M cap

The quantum alternative: Increase Bitcoin’s block size
Marin Ivezic, author of PostQuantum.com and founder of Applied Quantum, told Cointelegraph that Bitcoin’s SegWit scheme reduced the impact of large signatures by up to 75%. But his modeling of NIST’s ML-DSA-44 scheme, which has 2,420 bytes per signature, “puts block capacity at roughly 500 to 700 transactions, down from 2,500 to 3,000 today. That is where the block-size debate comes in.”
Increasing Bitcoin’s block size is a genuine alternative, but the community split over a proposal to double the block size back in 2017. Many of the arguments against remain relevant, as it’s a blunt fix that requires every node to carry, store and verify much more data. That’s more expensive and requires more equipment, which critics argue pushes the network toward centralization.
Blockstream Research has been experimenting in recent months with compressing the size of hash-based post-quantum signature schemes for use with Bitcoin. It has come up with the promising SHRINCS and SHRIMPS schemes, which have everyday signatures around five times larger than Bitcoin’s current ones, but up to 40 times larger if you lose your wallet and need to resurrect it.
While SHRINCS has been used to sign real transactions on the Liquid sidechain, its development is at an early stage and there are drawbacks in terms of complexity and usability. The much larger signatures would also slow the blockchain down, unless the block size was increased.
“Raising capacity natively is the simple engineering answer and the hardest governance answer,” said Marin Ivezic, author of PostQuantum.com and founder of Applied Quantum, about a block size increase. “We just don’t have time for those debates.”

ZK proof aggregation has advantages
ncrease, but it would arguably be much better at preserving decentralization while also making Bitcoin more efficient.
At their simplest, ZK proofs are a way to mathematically prove that something exists without needing to include all the details. For example, a ZK proof could demonstrate that you know the combination to a safe, without telling the other person what the combination is.
Generating a ZK proof for a single block technically only needs to be done once (although it’s safer to generate additional backups for redundancy), and the equipment required to do so looks like it would be much less expensive than a commercial mining setup.
Lean Ethereum’s specs are for proving equipment that costs under $100,000 (and can be run from an ordinary home). Verifying a ZK proof, meanwhile, can be done on almost any equipment, including a Raspberry Pi.
Ben-Sasson said that early Bitcoin devs like Greg Maxwell and Mike Hearn were “very bullish about ZK STARKs, which are post-quantum secure and have no trusted setup,” and that he believes Bitcoin Core developer Luke Dashjr and Blockstream founder Adam Back are coming around to the idea.
“I heard this myself from them. They are bullish on things related to and using ZK STARKs. I think each of them has spoken well, definitely privately but also publicly, in favor. Adam Back and Luke Dashjr don’t exactly see everything eye to eye, but on this I think they actually agree that it’s a great technology that, under the right terms, could find its way to Bitcoin.”
Cointelegraph contacted Back for comment, but did not receive a response.
Ethereum researcher Justin Drake has spoken publicly about his desire for Bitcoin to adopt Lean Ethereum’s ZK proof aggregation technology so that it becomes standard across the industry. This may be unfeasible for political reasons.

Ethereum aims to be post quantum by 2029. Source: Ethereum Foundation
Bitcoin specific ZK proposals
Given Bitcoin’s conservative culture, the most politically pragmatic way to add ZK to Bitcoin would likely be to re-enable OP_CAT, which is nine lines of code written by Satoshi.
“[He] even introduced and then he removed it,” said Ben-Sasson said. “And if you add that, you can get things like STARK proofs and then aggregation and post-quantum security.”
“I think it’s the best and safest solution that will really, really just jump-start again this journey that Satoshi really started and wanted.”
But despite a flurry of interest in OP_CAT about 12 to 24 months ago, it seems to have lost momentum more recently (although Bitcoin governance moves in mysterious ways).
There are also more speculative proposals, including OP_STARK_VERIFY, that would add opcodes specifically designed to more efficiently verify STARKs on Bitcoin. And BIP-360 co-author Ethan Heilman proposed aggregating Bitcoin’s signatures and public keys into a single STARK proof under the name BitZip.
Heilman told Cointelegraph earlier this year there are two main ways to achieve the desired result:
“Either add a bunch of general purpose opcodes to Bitcoin and then build something like a ZKRollup in Bitcoin or support STARKs at the consensus layer of Bitcoin. Alternatively, other less powerful aggregation schemes, such as CISA [Cross Input Signature Aggregation] might help here as well.”

What are the chances though?
Ivezic says Bitcoin governance, rather than technological capability, is the sticking point.
“Eli’s cryptography is rock solid: pure hash assumptions, no trusted setup, thousands of signatures compressed into one small proof. The problem is everything around the cryptography,” he says.
“Bitcoin Script cannot verify a STARK today, and a production verifier is a massive consensus surface compared with a narrow hash-signature opcode. Given that a tiny opcode like OP_CAT has spent years in debate, a base-layer STARK verifier is realistically a 2030s conversation.”
Meanwhile, Ethereum is targeting 2029 for its transition to post-quantum, and Solana has also been experimenting with adding post-quantum signatures. StarkNet’s three-phase transition will benefit from account abstraction, which enables the underlying cryptography to be upgraded without making every user manually transfer to new accounts.
As a result, Ben-Sasson said that Solana and Ethereum’s post-quantum roadmap will be “extremely hard.”
“On Starknet, we have this big advantage that we have already native account abstraction and smart wallets, which means that nothing is enshrined so its very easy to upgrade the wallets and the infrastructure to be post quantum.“
Features: The biggest blockchain upgrades still to come in 2026
Crypto World
Ethereum price risks $1,700 as support weakens
Ethereum price fell 2% to around $1,847 on Aug. 3 after another rejection near key moving averages left the $1,800 support zone exposed.
Summary
- Ethereum price fell 2.04%, reaching an intraday low of $1,828.
- ETH remains below its 50-day and 100-day moving averages at $1,889 and $1,927.
- 4-hour MACD and Chaikin Money Flow readings show weak momentum and continued selling pressure.
- A break below $1,800 could bring $1,785 and $1,700 into focus.
ETH slides after failing to reclaim $1,900
According to data from crypto.news, Ethereum (ETH) price traded at $1,847 at the time of writing, down 2.04% over the previous 24 hours. The token moved between an intraday high of $1,886 and a low of $1,829 on Binance.
The decline extended ETH’s retreat from its July 27 high near $1,975. Buyers have now failed several times to sustain a move above the resistance zone between $1,950 and $1,975.
ETH briefly rebounded after touching $1,828, but the recovery stalled around $1,850. That left the token near the lower end of its recent trading range and inside the closely watched $1,800–$1,850 support area.
The broader daily structure also remains defensive. Ethereum trades below its 50-day simple moving average at $1,889, its 100-day SMA at $1,927, and its 200-day SMA at $2,089.
Weak liquidity deepens Ethereum’s sell-off
The immediate pressure came from Ethereum’s failure to reclaim the moving-average resistance between $1,889 and $1,927. Sellers entered after the latest attempt faded, pushing ETH below $1,850 and toward its Aug. 3 low.
The 4-hour chart shows the price rolling over after forming a broad curved top below $1,975. Lower highs since late July suggest that buying demand has weakened, although ETH must still break below $1,800 to confirm a larger bearish continuation.

Momentum indicators support the cautious outlook. The 4-hour Moving Average Convergence Divergence remains below zero, with the MACD line near -10.46 and the signal line at about -9.92.
Chaikin Money Flow stands at -0.14. The negative reading indicates that selling volume has outweighed buying volume over the indicator’s measurement period.
Ethereum also faces broader liquidity pressure. A sharp weekly decline in Binance stablecoin netflows suggests less immediately available capital is entering the exchange, potentially reducing the buy-side liquidity available during market declines. However, exchange flows can change quickly and do not determine price direction alone.
Longer-term concerns include weaker institutional demand for Ethereum products relative to Bitcoin and lower mainnet fee revenue as activity shifts toward Layer-2 networks. These factors have weakened Ethereum’s investment narrative, but the current move remains primarily tied to the chart rejection and wider risk-off positioning.
Losing $1,800 could expose ETH to $1,700
The first support range sits between $1,828 and $1,800. ETH has already attracted buyers near the upper part of that zone, but repeated tests could weaken the remaining demand.

Ethereum’s lower daily moving-average ribbon stands near $1,785. A daily close below that level would strengthen the bearish setup and expose $1,700, followed by the June accumulation region around $1,550–$1,600.
CoinGlass’ 24-hour liquidation heatmap shows nearby leveraged-position clusters around $1,840, $1,820 and $1,810. A move through those levels could liquidate leveraged long positions and accelerate short-term volatility.

The map also shows overhead liquidity around $1,860–$1,875. If ETH rebounds above that range, short liquidations could help drive the price toward $1,890 and $1,920.
On the upside, Ethereum must first reclaim its 50-day SMA at $1,889. A daily close above the 100-day SMA at $1,927 would improve the setup, while a breakout above $1,975 would invalidate the current sequence of lower highs and place $2,000 back in focus.
The daily Relative Strength Index stands at 48.81, below its signal average of 56.44. The reading points to weakening momentum but remains well above oversold territory, leaving room for further selling if $1,800 fails.
Analyst sees Ethereum at a critical support zone
Crypto analyst Ted Pillows described the current support range as decisive for Ethereum’s next move.
“ETH is currently in the $1,800–$1,850 support level,” Pillows said. “This is very crucial for Ethereum to hold, or else it could drop towards $1,700.”
His chart presents two potential paths. Holding the current zone could allow ETH to recover toward $1,950 and then $2,050, while a confirmed breakdown could send the price toward $1,700.
The forecast aligns with the support levels visible on the daily chart, but the $1,700 target would require ETH to lose both the psychological $1,800 level and support near $1,785.
Fed outlook adds pressure on US crypto investors
Changing expectations for US monetary policy remain an additional risk for Ethereum and other speculative assets. Higher Treasury yields and a stronger dollar can reduce investor demand for crypto by increasing the relative appeal of dollar-denominated assets.
Slower-than-expected Federal Reserve rate cuts would keep financial conditions tighter and could limit institutional risk-taking. Ethereum may therefore remain sensitive to upcoming US inflation, employment and Fed policy signals.
For US investors, the near-term setup depends on whether ETH can defend $1,800 as macro liquidity remains constrained. A recovery above $1,927 would improve the technical outlook, but a daily close below $1,785 would shift attention toward $1,700.
Disclosure: This article does not represent investment advice. The content and materials featured on this page are for educational purposes only.
Crypto World
Solana price risks $70 drop as buyers retreat
Solana price slipped below $73 on Aug. 3 as weak spot demand and sustained capital outflows raised the risk of a drop toward $70.
Summary
- Solana price fell 1.47% to $72.55, placing the token near its daily lower Bollinger Band.
- The 4-hour chart shows SOL below all four tracked moving averages, with the 200-period SMA at $76.79.
- Chaikin Money Flow dropped to -0.17, indicating that selling pressure continued to outweigh buying demand.
- Liquidation liquidity is concentrated near $73.50–$74.50, making that zone the first major upside test.
Solana price extends its decline below $73
According to data from crypto.news, Solana (SOL) price traded at $72.55 on Aug. 3, down 1.47% on the daily chart after moving between an intraday high of $73.67 and a low of $71.98.
The decline extended a broader pullback from the July high near $82.50. SOL has formed a sequence of lower highs since that peak, with sellers defending rebounds around $78 and then $76.

Price has now fallen below the daily Bollinger Band midpoint at $75.09. This level previously acted as support but has turned into the first major resistance area.
SOL briefly moved below the lower Bollinger Band at $71.49 before recovering above $72. That reaction shows buyers remain active around $71.50–$72, but the limited rebound suggests they have not regained control.
The Awesome Oscillator stood at -3.56, with its red bars expanding below zero. That reading points to strengthening bearish momentum on the daily timeframe rather than an immediate trend reversal.
Flat spot demand weakens SOL’s recovery
Solana attempted to rebound after falling toward $71 on Aug. 2, but spot demand failed to recover alongside price.
Analyst Ted Pillows described the divergence as a sign of weakness.
“$SOL is bouncing back. But spot demand is flat. Sign of weakness.”
The 4-hour Chaikin Money Flow reading supports that view. CMF fell to -0.17, meaning more capital was leaving SOL than entering it during the measured period.

Declining spot participation can leave a rebound dependent on leveraged derivatives positions. Such moves are more vulnerable to reversals because they lack the direct buying pressure needed to absorb new selling.
The weakness also comes as activity tied to speculative Solana tokens cools from previous peaks. Lower decentralized exchange activity and weaker fee generation would reduce one source of demand for SOL, which traders need to pay network fees and interact with on-chain applications.
Four-hour indicators keep sellers in control
Solana remains below every major moving average displayed on the 4-hour chart. The 20-period SMA stands at $72.96, followed by the 50-period SMA at $73.88 and the 100-period SMA at $75.06.
The 200-period SMA, currently near $76.79, represents the strongest overhead technical barrier. SOL would need to reclaim that level to weaken the current sequence of lower highs.
The moving averages are also bearishly ordered, with each shorter-term average sitting below the longer-term measures. That structure suggests the decline is established across several trading horizons.
A move above $72.96 could open a retest of $73.88. The $73.88–$75.06 range is particularly important because it combines two moving averages with liquidity visible on the three-day liquidation heatmap.
Failure to reclaim that area would leave SOL exposed to another test of $71.50. A daily close below the lower Bollinger Band could bring $70 into focus, followed by the June support region near $67.50.
Liquidation clusters could increase volatility
CoinGlass’ three-day liquidation heatmap shows the largest nearby concentration of leveraged positions above the current price, particularly around $73.50–$74.

Additional liquidity appears near $74.50 and $76, creating potential targets if SOL begins a short-covering rebound. A move into these clusters could force bearish traders to close positions, accelerating the recovery.
However, liquidity also appears below the market around $71.50 and $70. These clusters could attract price if support near $72 fails.
This leaves SOL between competing liquidity zones. The closer upside concentration could produce a short-term bounce, but the weak CMF reading and bearish moving-average structure suggest any recovery must be confirmed by stronger spot buying.
Fee-burn vote offers Solana a potential catalyst
SolanaFloor reported that proposals addressing Solana’s fee burn and token disinflation were set to enter an initial vote on Aug. 3.
According to the report, the measures would double annual disinflation to 30%, remove about $1.36 billion in projected token issuance over six years and increase daily burns from roughly 650 SOL to 9,000 SOL.
Those figures remain projected outcomes rather than confirmed changes. The proposals must progress through governance before they can alter SOL’s supply dynamics.
For US investors, the immediate backdrop also remains tied to broader risk appetite. High-beta tokens such as SOL can face added pressure when elevated Treasury yields make lower-risk dollar assets more attractive. A shift in Federal Reserve expectations or US yields could therefore affect whether buyers return at the current support zone.
The short-term outlook remains bearish below $75.06. Reclaiming that level would improve the setup and expose $76.79, while a confirmed break below $71.49 would increase the risk of a move toward $70.
Disclosure: This article does not represent investment advice. The content and materials featured on this page are for educational purposes only.
Crypto World
Ethereum ETFs Post Best Month Since October 2025 but Fed Hold Chills Demand
Ethereum (ETH) spot ETFs recorded their strongest month since October 2025. Yet the ending week of July raises concerns about whether institutional appetite is already fading.
Inflows dropped 74% in the final week as the Federal Reserve held rates steady. The pullback raises a key question over whether the demand will carry into August.
Ethereum ETF Inflows Hit 9-Month High Before Buyers Retreat
Ethereum funds attracted $365.17 million in July, their best showing in 9 months, per SoSoValue. The total came after back-to-back redemptions of $540.88 million in May and $528.99 million in June.
Follow us on X to get the latest news as it happens
The recovery lost steam fast, though. Weekly inflows collapsed from $103.9 million to $27.42 million in the week ending July 31.
Price action offered little help. ETH touched $1,967 on July 27, its highest level in nearly two months, before sliding to about $1,863 by Friday, CoinGecko data shows.
Demand also slowed across other ETF products. Bitcoin (BTC) funds shed $61.53 million during the week, snapping three straight weeks of net buying.
Hyperliquid (HYPE) products bled for a third consecutive week, losing $14.75 million. XRP (XRP) ETFs added $14.86 million, pushing cumulative inflows past $1.5 billion.
Fed Hold and Hike Odds Put August Demand in Question
Macro caution appears central to the retreat. The Federal Reserve voted 9-3 on July 29 to keep the interest rate at 3.50%-3.75%.
Three regional presidents, Beth Hammack, Neel Kashkari, and Lorie Logan, dissented in favor of a hike with inflation still above target. Markets now price in a 64% chance of a quarter-point hike in September, keeping tightening risk alive for risk assets.
“I want to stress, of course, that decisions by this committee matter a great deal, and where necessary and appropriate, we will not hesitate to act,” Fed Chair Kevin Warsh said.
If investors stay risk-off into August, the late-July slowdown may extend and erase the month’s progress. However, a revival in demand would confirm July’s rebound as the start of a broader recovery rather than a one-month bounce. The Fed’s Jackson Hole symposium in late August may offer the next signal.
Subscribe to our YouTube channel to watch leaders and journalists provide expert insights
The post Ethereum ETFs Post Best Month Since October 2025 but Fed Hold Chills Demand appeared first on BeInCrypto.
Crypto World
Saylor sells more bitcoin, buys back more STRC
Strategy (MSTR) raised $104.73 million last week with the sale of 1,638 bitcoin, and raised an additional $290.6 million via the sale of common stock.
Alongside, the company repurchased 912,143 shares of its high-yielding preferred stock STRC for $81.2 million, according to an SEC filing Monday morning.
The bitcoin sales reduced Strategy’s holdings to 842,138 BTC, acquired for $63.51 billion at an average price of $75,419. The company lifted its USD reserve by $250 million.
The company announced over the weekend that it would maintain STRC’s annual dividend rate at 12%, saying it does not intend to recommend a reduction until the shares trade consistently near their stated $100 value.
Crypto World
XRP News: xrpld 3.2.1 Hotfix Patches Manifest Flood Draining XRPL Node Resources
In XRP news today, the XRP Ledger released xrpld 3.2.1 on July 31 after a validator manifest flood was detected hitting nodes that same day, with Ripple Director of Engineering Vijay Khanna issuing an urgent call on August 1–2 for all node operators to upgrade immediately.
The ledger continued closing normally throughout the incident, with no confirmed fund losses and no consensus failure, but unpatched nodes remain exposed to resource-exhaustion risk until operators complete the two-step upgrade process.
This news dropped as XRP USD fell 1.5% from $1.10 to $1.06 over the past 24 hours, with daily trading volume of $791M. This follows a worrying trend in which Ripple has crashed -4% over the past seven days.
XRP News: What the Manifest Flood Actually Did
The attack exploited a structural gap in how XRPL nodes handled validator manifests: before the patch, nodes would accept, cache, and rebroadcast an unlimited number of manifests tied to unknown validator keys with no ceiling on volume or storage.
An attacker could generate junk manifests at scale, forcing nodes to burn memory, disk space, and bandwidth processing data they would never act on.
The mechanism is closer to a denial-of-service resource drain than a consensus attack; the network’s transaction processing was never disrupted, but the exposure was real for any operator running unprotected infrastructure.
The development team confirmed the problem was specifically tied to how XRPLF nodes handled validator manifests, though as of publication the root cause and full exploitation details have not been publicly disclosed.
A technical post-mortem is forthcoming from XRPL Operations, which should clarify attacker behavior, traffic volumes, and any additional hardening steps.
For those tracking broader blockchain security vulnerabilities and attack vectors, the manifest flood fits a pattern where unbounded auxiliary data channels become leverage points even when consensus logic holds.
Discover: The Best Crypto to Diversify Your Portfolio
Four Safeguards Introduced in the Hotfix
The hotfix introduces four discrete protections targeting different points in the manifest handling pipeline. Oversized manifests are now rejected outright before full decoding. Incoming manifest batches per network message are capped.
The volume of manifest data shared with new peers is limited. And the unknown-key manifest cache is hard-capped at 100 entries, preventing unbounded growth from unrecognized validator identities.
Beyond those four caps, unknown validator manifests are no longer written to disk. That change means any pre-patch flood data is cleared on restart rather than persisting in storage, which is precisely why the upgrade requires a specific two-step sequence.
Firstly, install 3.2.1, let the server run for one to two minutes, then perform a second restart to purge any manifests retained from before the patch. Skipping the second restart leaves stale flood data in place. Operators should also verify their systems trust Ripple’s current GPG signing key, rotated February 18, 2026, or automatic upgrades may fail silently.
Trade XRP on Bybit and Get a Chance to Win Our $1,000 USDT Airdrop
Who Needs to Act and Why It Matters Now
In other XRP news, exchanges, custodians, wallet back ends, data providers, and any business running its own XRPL server must complete the node upgrade. Ordinary XRP holders do not need to move funds or change keys.
The urgency is compounded by upgrade adoption lag: xrpld v3.2.0, the larger June 15 release that renamed the reference server and required infrastructure config change, spread faster among validators than across the broader node network, meaning a cohort of operators may still be running older versions that are now doubly exposed.
The network security response here was operationally sound: a targeted hotfix, clear operator instructions, and a pending post-mortem that signals the team is treating this as a formal security incident rather than routine maintenance.
In the broader XRP ecosystem, the incident comes as the ledger scales; the network added nearly 490,000 new accounts in the first half of 2026, per supplementary data from Coinpaper, pushing total accounts past 8.4 million.
That growth trajectory makes robust infrastructure hardening a structural necessity, not an edge-case concern. Institutional developments, including Aviva’s tokenized liquidity fund on XRPL and growing enterprise adoption, raise the stakes for any operator still delaying the patch.
Discover: The Best Token Presales
The post XRP News: xrpld 3.2.1 Hotfix Patches Manifest Flood Draining XRPL Node Resources appeared first on Cryptonews.
Crypto World
Trumps’ American Bitcoin reports record BTC output, narrower Q2 loss

Trump-linked Bitcoin miner produced a record 932 BTC in the second quarter, lifting mining revenue 8% as its net loss narrowed from the previous quarter.
Crypto World
South Africa proposes reporting rules for cross border crypto transfers
South Africa has proposed new rules requiring cross-border crypto transfers to pass through authorized providers and be reported to the central bank, expanding the country’s effort to bring digital assets under its financial control framework.
Summary
- South Africa has proposed rules requiring cross border crypto transfers to go through authorized service providers and be reported to the central bank.
- The draft says only transfers to offshore providers or private wallets would qualify as regulated cross border crypto transactions.
- Individuals would be allowed to move crypto offshore only within South Africa’s existing foreign currency allowances.
- The proposal builds on earlier plans to bring crypto under the country’s foreign exchange control framework.
- Public comments on the draft Crypto Asset Manual will remain open until Sept. 30.
According to local media, South Africa’s National Treasury and the South African Reserve Bank (SARB) on Monday released a draft Crypto Asset Manual setting out when crypto transactions become regulated cross-border events and how they must be handled. The proposal forms part of the country’s ongoing overhaul of its capital flow rules first introduced in April.
South Africa has defined when crypto transfers become reportable
Under the draft, moving crypto offshore will only qualify as a cross-border transaction in specific situations. A report to the SARB’s Financial Surveillance Department (FinSurv) would be required when crypto assets move from a locally authorized Crypto Asset Service Provider (CASP) to an offshore CASP or into a privately controlled non-custodial wallet.
The proposal says people who wish to transfer crypto abroad would have to use an authorized provider instead of sending assets directly through unregulated channels. FinSurv would receive reports of those transactions as part of the country’s foreign exchange monitoring process.
Domestic crypto activity would remain outside those reporting requirements. Buying or selling crypto in South African rand through a local authorized provider would not be treated as a cross-border event under the proposed framework.
For now, the draft allows only individuals to move crypto assets offshore, and only within South Africa’s existing foreign currency allowances. The SARB also said the framework does not recognize crypto assets as legal tender and currently does not distinguish between different categories of digital assets because additional research is still underway.
Interested parties can submit comments on the draft until Sept. 30.
Crypto rules build on South Africa’s earlier capital flow proposal
The new manual follows South Africa’s Draft Capital Flow Management Regulations released in April, which proposed bringing crypto assets into the country’s foreign exchange control system for the first time.
The National Treasury and SARB said in April that crypto assets would be treated as a form of capital moving across borders, placing them alongside other regulated assets under the country’s capital flow regime. The proposal was also designed to replace South Africa’s Exchange Control Regulations dating back to 1961 while aligning the country’s framework with recommendations from the Financial Action Task Force and the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
The April proposal introduced the concept of authorized crypto service providers, transaction reporting, declaration requirements and administrative penalties for non-compliance. Treasury officials said at the time the policy would focus on reporting, traceability and risk-based oversight instead of relying only on transaction-by-transaction approvals.
The draft Crypto Asset Manual now explains how those principles would work in practice by defining the point at which crypto movements become cross-border transactions that fall under financial surveillance rules.
Authorities have linked the framework to financial crime controls
According to Reuters, the reporting framework is intended to stop crypto assets from being used to bypass South Africa’s existing financial controls while helping authorities identify illicit financial flows.
By limiting offshore transfers to authorized service providers, regulators would receive transaction data through FinSurv instead of relying on transfers conducted outside the regulated financial system.
The proposal arrives as crypto adoption continues to grow in South Africa. Reuters, citing blockchain analytics firm Chainalysis, said the country already has hundreds of licensed virtual asset service providers, while several major banks are developing crypto products for institutional clients.
South Africa has become one of Africa’s largest digital asset markets in recent years. Earlier industry estimates placed annual crypto transaction value in the country among the highest on the continent, while blockchain investment has continued to attract institutional interest.
Crypto oversight has expanded beyond capital controls
The latest consultation follows another crypto policy proposal published in July by the South African Revenue Service (SARS), which released draft guidance explaining how existing tax laws apply to digital assets.
Unlike the latest capital flow proposal, the SARS draft focused on taxation rather than foreign exchange regulation. It confirmed that crypto assets are treated as intangible assets instead of legal tender or foreign currency under existing tax law and explained how income tax and capital gains tax could apply depending on each taxpayer’s circumstances.
The tax authority also outlined how activities including crypto trading, token swaps, staking, mining, decentralized finance participation and crypto payments may trigger taxable events under current legislation.
At the same time, South Africa has begun implementing the Crypto-Asset Reporting Framework (CARF), under which crypto service providers will collect and report selected customer and transaction information to SARS. The first reporting period runs from March 1, 2026, through Feb. 28, 2027.
Crypto World
Robinhood Cleared for UK Crypto, But There Are Major Limits
Robinhood Markets won UK crypto approval on July 31. The surprise is everything the approval does not allow.
The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) added Robinhood U.K. Ltd to its crypto register. The company may pass customer orders to other firms. It cannot hold anyone’s coins.
What the FCA actually approved
Robinhood has been an FCA-approved stockbroker in Britain since August 2019. Crypto is new ground. The regulator added it to the crypto register on July 31, 2026.
Two limits took effect the same day, with the first one mattering most:
- Robinhood UK may only arrange crypto trades.
In plain terms, it takes your order and hands it to someone else to finish.
UK crypto rules cover two other jobs. One is running an exchange. The other is holding coins for customers. Robinhood got neither.
- The second limit bans crypto cash machines unless the FCA agrees in writing.
The register also says the firm cannot hold client money. Even this much is hard to win. FCA figures show 291 firms applied between January 2020 and October 2022. Only 38 made the register. Another 155 gave up before a decision.
One point matters for customers. Being on the register is not a safety net. The FCA warns that crypto services are unlikely to be protected if something goes wrong.
Britain’s compensation scheme rarely covers crypto losses. The financial ombudsman usually cannot help either.
Rivals Got There First, With More Freedom
Robinhood is late. The register opened in 2020.
Kraken’s UK arm, Coinbase, and Revolut are all on it. Several also hold e-money licences, which let them handle customer cash. Robinhood UK does not.
It already owns one company on the list. Bitstamp UK Ltd joined years earlier, and Robinhood bought its parent for $224 million in June 2025.
That makes Bitstamp the obvious place for UK orders to land.
Robinhood has also tried and failed here before. It agreed to buy British crypto app Ziglu in April 2022. Ten months later it walked away. The $12 million it had already sent Ziglu was written off.
So the new approval looks like housekeeping rather than a launch. Robinhood told investors in July it plans to start UK crypto soon.
Its own small print still says UK customers get no crypto trading or custody. Elsewhere the company keeps building, including its Robinhood Chain public testnet.
Why October 2027 Decides What Survives
This approval is temporary. Tougher UK crypto rules start on October 25, 2027.
Every firm on today’s register must apply again. Nothing carries over.
The window is five months long. Firms that miss it must stop most crypto work. The FCA has warned that today’s registration counts for nothing at that stage.
That deadline has driven Britain’s crypto policy debate all year, alongside UK stablecoin payment plans.
For investors, any reward is years away. Crypto revenue fell 38% to $100 million in Robinhood’s second quarter. Total revenue still hit a record $1.31 billion.
The market shrugged on Monday. HOOD closed Friday at $86.56, then traded at $87.22 before the bell, up 0.76%. Its 52-week high is $153.86.
The real test comes with that 2027 application. Robinhood sells trading, custody, and staking across Europe. An arranging license supports none of it.
What the company asks for will show how serious it is about Britain.
The post Robinhood Cleared for UK Crypto, But There Are Major Limits appeared first on BeInCrypto.
Crypto World
Solo Bitcoin (BTC) miner nets $200,000 as Coldcard wallet hack rocks sentiment: Crypto Daily
A solo miner scored a major win even as the broader market frets over a multimillion-dollar Coldcard hardware wallet exploit.
According to mempool data, an independent miner successfully packaged block 960,804 early Monday. The block reward of 3.157 BTC is valued at approximately $199,300. Details on the specific hardware used remain unknown.
The success came just three weeks after another solo miner, running a single hobbyist-grade Bitaxe device, struck block 957,382, pocketing 3.1382 BTC, worth roughly $200,000 at the time.
These back-to-back wins highlight a broader trend. Solo miners have already claimed 13 blocks this year. While individual operators continue to defy the odds with relatively modest setups, the wider Bitcoin mining sector has come under stress due to tight margins. That has prompted several large mining companies to pivot toward artificial intelligence data centers and related infrastructure in search of sustainability.
Meanwhile, small BTC holders continue to express frustration over the Coldcard incident, which has led to the loss of long-held Bitcoin savings. Over the weekend, onchain data showed signs of some BTC holders moving millions of dollars worth of coins to exchanges.
Crypto World
Bitcoin Could Confirm Bear-Market Bottom in August: 10x Research
Bitcoin could confirm a bear-market bottom in August with a monthly close above $63,000, according to 10x Research.
Markus Thielen, founder of 10x Research, said in a Monday report shared with Cointelegraph that Bitcoin closed July below the threshold needed to confirm a technical bottom.
A monthly close near $63,000 would turn several of 10x Research’s cycle indicators bullish. Bitcoin was trading at $63,140 when the analysis was prepared, meaning a relatively small gain from July’s closing level could trigger the reversal signal. The company said it continued to favor long positions but would shift to a neutral stance if Bitcoin broke key support levels and moving averages.
The base case is that the Federal Reserve holds interest rates steady. However, further increases in the 10-year Treasury yield could force a September rate hike, while the Iran conflict remained an unpredictable risk.
The report said miners could generate roughly 100,000 BTC of selling pressure as some miners shift their businesses toward artificial intelligence. The company said it expected additional supply from Bitcoin treasury companies unwinding positions, though it described macroeconomic conditions as the larger risk to the market.

Bitcoin monthly relative strength index (RSI) chart. Source: 10x Research
Separately, Grayscale head of research Zach Pandl said in a July 22 report that Bitcoin may have bottomed earlier than the traditional four-year cycle would suggest. That pattern would place the cycle low in September or October.
Pandl said macroeconomic conditions, including Fed policy, would remain the primary drivers of Bitcoin’s price and could determine when it bottoms.
Related: Strategy-led group pledges $15M to quantum-proof Bitcoin network
More indicators point to an approaching Bitcoin bottom
Earlier in July, crypto brokerage K33 said more than half of Bitcoin’s supply was held at a loss, which it described as another indication that a market bottom was approaching.

Bitcoin during periods when 50% of supply was held at a loss, with subsequent annual returns. Source: K33
Bitcoin bottomed within 13 to 31 days of the same threshold being reached in 2017, 2018 and 2022, according to K33.
In a June interview, Swan Bitcoin CEO Cory Klippsten told Cointelegraph that long-term holders’ record balance of 14.7 million BTC was another indication that Bitcoin was nearing a bottom.
Magazine: ‘Bitcoin Standard’ author explores reality where decentralized gold stopped WWI
-
Business5 days agoWhy Trees Belong on the Risk Register
-
Fashion3 days agoWeekend Open Thread: Wit & Wisdom
-
Politics3 days agoMeta enters AI-training agreement with far-right ‘propaganda rag’ Newsmax
-
Entertainment6 days ago‘Stargate’ Creator’s New Sci-Fi Series Returns for Season 3 Tomorrow
-
Crypto World2 days agoMicroStrategy Post-Earnings CLARITY Act Push Could Add New Catalyst for Its Stock
-
Politics6 days agoThe Part of the Electric Transition Nobody Wants to Discuss
-
Business5 days agoMajor shareholder moves on Canyon
-
Crypto World2 days agoXRP Ledger v3.3.0 brings five institutional features
-
News Videos4 days agoBitcoin Enters the 3rd Stage of the Bear Market
-
Crypto World6 days agoKraken Enables Retail Access to Jersey Mike’s IPO via Tokenized Shares
-
Tech6 days agoNew macOS Sequoia & Sonoma security updates for older Macs
-
Politics4 days agoLuke Littler’s dominance sparks GOAT debate
-
News Videos6 days agoClaude: Build Financial Dashboards in Minutes (2026)
-
Business6 days agoJohnson & Johnson agrees to $5.5B settlement over talc cancer claims
-
Sports3 days agoSeema Kaliramna Wins Discus Throw Bronze, Takes India’s CWG Medals Tally To 17
-
Crypto World1 day agoCrypto PAC spending tops $2M in Michigan House race
-
Business3 days agoTrump Announces Hamas Disarmament Agreement as Iran Strikes Kuwait Air Base and US Attacks Pause Overnight
-
Tech5 days agoGemini can now summarize the messiest comment threads in Google Docs
-
Tech1 day agoESET tracks rise in malicious AI skills and adaptable malware
-
NewsBeat4 days agoFour people die trying to cross Channel in small boats

Urgent XRPL Update: Node Operators Told to Install Critical Fix
Dinarian888 (@Dinarian888)
ChartNerd
(@ChartNerdTA)
You must be logged in to post a comment Login