Keys sneak into couch cushions, wallets slip behind desks, and luggage disappears from the airport carousel. For years, Android users saw Apple’s AirTag handle routine disappearances, while Google delegated the task to third-party devices. That gap was bridged this week. Google developed its own finder, the Pixel Tag, a small oblong tracker designed to travel alongside the items people really lose.
The Pixel Tag is noticeably slimmer than Apple’s circular AirTag, measuring just 1.8 inches tall and 1.1 inches wide. And at only 0.2 inches thick, it’s a clear and pleasant contrast. The Pixel Tag, weighing barely 0.4 ounces with its battery inside, is available in only one soft grey-green color, Fog, as named by Google. The Pixel Tag is made of stainless steel and polycarbonate, with a little G logo sitting on the metal face next to a speaker opening, resulting in a basic yet effective design. The battery cover can be removed from the back by twisting it, and it accepts a regular CR2032 coin cell. Google estimates that the battery will last more than a year in ordinary use, and you can replace it yourself if necessary. The IP67 seal keeps dust out and can resist a 30-minute submersion in a meter of water.
FIND YOUR ITEMS ON FIND MY — AirTag (2nd generation) helps you keep track of what matters. Attach one to an item you want to keep track of using the…
EXPANDED PRECISION FINDING ON IPHONE AND APPLE WATCH — Get step-by-step directions to your lost item on iPhone and, now, Apple Watch.*
ENHANCED SPEAKER — With a 50% louder speaker and a new, distinctive chime, it’s easier than ever to hear and find AirTag.*
Users simply pull the battery tab, bring the tag near any phone running Android 9 or later, and Fast Pair will do the rest. Once linked, the tag displays in the Find Hub app, where you may name it to distinguish between your keys and your bag. When the item is nearby, the phone can play a sound thru the tag’s speaker, and if you push the physical button on the tag itself, your phone will ring even if it is on quiet, which is a handy feature when the phone is missing.
Advertisement
As soon as the tag leaves your Bluetooth range, Google’s Find Hub network will step in to assist. More than a billion Android devices quietly listen for the signal and send the owner an encrypted position. Google is quite concerned with privacy, so rest assured that location data is encrypted from beginning to finish, and they are also keeping an eye out to warn you if an unknown tag appears in your presence. You can also share a single tag with up to 10 individuals, which is particularly useful for family keys or a shared suitcase.
Precision improves greatly as you get closer. Phones with Ultra Wideband capability show not only the distance to your item but also the direction, which is quite useful while looking for misplaced items. There’s also a feature called Bluetooth Channel Sounding, which adds another layer of accuracy to distance measurements. However, some features necessitate a current device, such as the new Pixel 11 series or certain high-end Samsung handsets. Older phones continue to track the tag via basic Bluetooth and the network.
The rest of the Pixel family can lend you a helping hand. Your Pixel Watch can simply locate or ring your Pixel Tag via the Find Hub app or a browser. If you have Pixel Buds, simply ask Gemini to make the tag beep. Left-behind alerts will also notify you if your tagged item remains behind as you walk away, as the Pixel Tag contains an accelerometer that detects when the object starts or stops moving, providing the app with extra important data.
Google charges $29 for a single Pixel Tag and $99 for a four-pack, which is the same as Apple’s AirTags. They will be available on the Google Store on November 11th. Even while it does not come with a built-in loop or clip, you can easily add a keychain or case, exactly like with the competition’s AirTags.
Multiple distributed denial-of-service (DDoS) attacks targeted the Threema secure messaging service earlier this week, causing severe disruptions to communications.
Organizations using Threema On-Prem did not experience any issues because they rely on their own infrastructure.
In a post-mortem report on Friday, the end-to-end encrypted instant messaging service said that the attacks were difficult to defend against because the threat actor constantly changed patterns.
Threema is a paid messaging application developed by the Swiss technology company of the same name, with a heavy focus on security and privacy.
The service relies on its own server infrastructure in various locations in Switzerland and promises “no ads, no profiling, no hidden data analyses.”
Advertisement
On Tuesday around 6 PM UTC, users started to report service interruptions. The company responded about an hour later, saying that based on the information available at the time, the cause was “a network outage on our colocation partner’s side.”
“Now Threema network status saying ‘Connecting’ instead of ‘Connected,’ welp… 10mins later, now it’s back to saying ‘Connected,’ yet msgs are still very much not sending right away & very delayed,” one user complained.
About three hours later, Threema said it was working to restore all of its services after its partner reported that the network issue had been resolved.
The next day, users in Switzerland, India, and China continued to report that the service was down, despite Threema’s status page showing no problems.
Advertisement
However, the company confirmed that it was being targeted by a series of DDoS attacks it was working to mitigate, and warned users that intermittent outages were likely to occur.
Threema explains that the attacks made its service “temporarily unavailable or only partially available on Tuesday evening and Wednesday morning.”
Typically, DDoS attacks are mitigated without any noticeable impact due to effective defenses that adapt to the attack’s patterns, Threema said.
The attacks this week were large-scale, though, and targeted both Threema and its colocation partner, Nine.
Advertisement
“It is not entirely clear whether Threema was the primary target or whether the attacks were directed at multiple targets,” the company notes.
Defending against the attacks proved challenging because they persisted for an extended period, while the threat actor continually changed its tactics to circumvent mitigation measures.
An unrelated technical issue prevented the company from updating the current system status page, and the company decided to take it offline until the problem was fixed.
“Business customers using Threema Work were informed via email on Wednesday morning about the unstable service conditions, and account managers provided information on the current situation in response to inquiries.”
Advertisement
To avoid similar incidents, the Swiss company has implemented “specialized DDoS protection as an additional measure” to filter attack traffic upstream and reduce the load on its infrastructure.
Overall prevention scores can hide what happens after initial access. Once attackers are using valid credentials, prevention drops sharply.
The Blue Report 2026 measures defenses technique by technique across 338 million simulations run in customer production environments.
One of the oddest things about macOS is the installation dance. Dealing with disk images, dragging and dropping—it’s the main way of installing software from outside the Mac App Store, and it’s annoying.
You download a DMG file, open it to mount a virtual disk, and drag the application from there to your Applications folder. Then, to keep things tidy, you need to unmount the virtual disk and delete the DMG file. It’s … convoluted. To be fair, it was relatively streamlined back in 2001 when it became the main way to install applications on the then-new Mac OS X. But that was a quarter-century ago, and there has to be a better way by now.
Developer Jeff Schumann agrees, so he built a tool that does all these steps for you: EasyDMG. This completely free app has an adorable hamster mascot and the slogan “Created out of spite.” It lets you double-click DMGs to install software, the way it always should have worked.
To get started, simply download the application and install it using the very same installation dance you’re trying to avoid. (Ironic, sure, but hopefully this is the last time.) After that you need to set EasyDMG as the default application for opening DMG files—there’s a button right in the settings that will do this for you.
Advertisement
Courtesy of Justin Pot
Do that and you’re basically done. The next time you need to install software from a DMG file you’ll see EasyDMG pop up instead of the virtual disk. A window with a progress bar will let you know how the process is going, from mounting the virtual disk to verifying the application to doing the actual installation.
A filing submitted by Meta to the US Patent and Trademark Office shows that Meta has continued developing features that use facial recognition in conjunction with its controversial smart glasses. The application for the patent was submitted in February and made public this week. There’s no indication of how long the approval process could take or whether the patent will ultimately be granted.
The application, which CNET has viewed, includes 44 pages of drawings and descriptions of a system that would use Meta’s smart glasses technology in conjunction with AI facial recognition. The system would use AI facial recognition to identify people and create media, including videos, that contain that information. It could also use inputs such as location data or information from online services to create those media files, support a wide range of content-creation activities or interact with Meta services, according to the lengthy filing.
A representative for Meta did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
The patent filing comes at a sensitive time for Meta and this product category. Privacy advocates have heavily criticized the company’s lack of privacy protections, while the nickname “pervert glasses” has been used more frequently in media stories about its smart glasses.
Advertisement
That sentiment was expanded upon by the nonprofit Center for Democracy and Technology, which issued a statement about the patent application, calling it an escalation of privacy harms.
“Meta’s patent application includes relatively innocuous use cases, but, if deployed, this tech can and will be used for much more nefarious purposes and will put marginalized people like victims of stalking and domestic violence at risk,” wrote Ariana Aboulafia, project lead for disability rights in technology policy for the center.
“No one should be forced to constantly question whether the person next to them at a party, in the doctor’s office, or on the train is constantly recording, identifying, and storing information about them,” Aboulafia wrote.
Meta isn’t the only company that has been the target of increased public scrutiny over technology and privacy; Flock Safety has been countering bad publicity and vandalism as well as pausing or canceling contracts for its license plate reader cameras in cities, including Los Angeles and Dayton, Ohio. Flock’s technology has also been criticized for incidents in which law enforcement officers have misused the tech to track people; despite policy changes, there are many ways to circumvent its safeguards.
Jared Cooney Horvath has spent over 15 years studying how people learn, and he says the picture for today’s kids isn’t good. The neuroscientist and former teacher argues that classroom technology is quietly eroding how children think and retain knowledge, according to a report from The Guardian.
Horvath’s new book, The Digital Delusion, lays out the case that generational progress in health and education has stalled since around 2000, right around the time kids started to get access to screens. Concerns about early exposure run even deeper, with some researchers now warning that screen habits formed before age two carry their own developmental risks.
What does Horvath think screens are the problem?
Horvath points to falling IQ scores across the West even as time spent in school has stayed steady or increased. He traces the shift to the rapid growth of educational technology, an industry he says is now worth $400 billion in the United States alone.
Laptop adoption in schools took off around 2010, then accelerated sharply when Covid forced a digital pivot. Most schools never reversed course afterward. Horvath cites Pisa testing data showing that students who spent more than six hours a day on screens scored significantly worse than peers who avoided screens entirely.
Advertisement
Ron Lach / Pexels
Does everyone in education agree with him?
Not quite. Rose Luckin, an emerita professor at the UCL Knowledge Lab, says Horvath is right that edtech was oversold without solid proof behind it. But she points out that the same Pisa data shows moderate device use actually correlates with better outcomes than no use at all.
Meanwhile, Dylan Wiliam, an education assessment expert at UCL, adds that the current research only shows correlation, not causation. Daisy Christodoulou of No More Marking agrees society got too comfortable with unproven tech, even if she’s more optimistic about its potential going forward.
As with most robot mowers, the power adapter is large and may not fit your outdoor socket, so you’ll likely need an outdoor box and extension lead. The TerraMow V100 also comes with a covered charging base to shield it from bad weather, something many manufacturers will charge you a couple of hundred extra for.
There’s no antenna or anything else to set up, because this mower relies on its triple camera system and AI to map and navigate your lawn. You can connect your phone via Bluetooth, and it supports Wi-Fi. It also comes with a year of 4G service ($19 per year after that), but you don’t need it if you have Wi-Fi in your garden. The 4G and Wi-Fi are just for firmware updates and remote control when you’re away from home. It has GPS tracking for theft alerts.
The setup was by far the easiest of any robot mower I’ve tested. Aside from not having to fiddle with wire or an RTK antenna, the TerraMow V1000 has an automapping feature. Usually, you have to remote-control your robot mower around the borders of your lawn to define the cutting zone. I have tried other mowers with automatic mapping, but I always ended up having to make significant edits to the map. Not so with the TerraMow. The V1000 successfully mapped my (admittedly straightforward) lawn without any input required.
The spec sheet for the TerraMow V1000 is relatively modest. It can handle slopes up to 18 degrees, offers a cutting height of 0.98 to 2.95 inches (25 to 75 mm), and a cutting width of 8 inches (20 cm). I like that you can define different settings for different zones. Perhaps you want a finer cut or closer edge mowing on one section of lawn. It can run for 150 minutes on a full charge and takes two hours to recharge. Like most robot mowers, it leaves the cuttings to mulch, and you can set a cutting schedule in the app.
A Cut Above
I didn’t have high expectations of the TerraMow V1000, because it relies entirely on AI vision, which can be erratic in my experience. To my surprise, it mowed my lawn in perfect straight lines with a kind of fish-tail maneuver at the end of each turn, leaving neat but narrow stripes and a fairly uniform cut. Where the edges allowed, such as along a path, the TerraMow cut right up to the edge. On sides with obstacles, such as a garden shed and tall plants, it left a modest border. Strips of uncut grass of various sizes seem to be unavoidable with robot mowers, but the TerraMow V1000 got closer to finishing the job than most.
Advertisement
We have three cats, so obstacle avoidance is crucial, and the TerraMow V1000 does not disappoint. I always test mowers with a football, and I also had a badminton net on the lawn with very thin posts. The V1000 was able to skirt around both without touching them.
The navigation is generally impressive, and that extends to creating paths between lawn areas and also back to its charging station. You don’t have to install the charging station on the lawn; I put mine slightly farther back, tucked out of sight next to some wooden outdoor furniture across concrete paving, and it had no issues finding its way in and out.
Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei recently pushed back against the idea that he’s been painting an overly pessimistic picture of artificial intelligence and how it might shape the future.
Claiming that Amodei has “lost the argument” when it comes to AI regulation (Anthropic has advocated for some regulations, including a California bill that imposes transparency requirements on large AI companies), and given that “he is about to be the CEO of one of the most important companies in the world,” Baker wrote, “I respectfully think he should make an effort to be a more positive advocate for his own industry.”
Baker is far from the only one arguing that AI skepticism and even government crackdowns stem in part from simply taking the dire warnings of some AI executives seriously. But in his response, Amodei disagreed with the idea that his “messaging has been disproportionately negative.” Instead, he said that his writing has been “about equally balanced between risks and benefits,” and that he wrote his essay “Machines of Loving Grace” because he “didn’t feel the AI industry was painting an inspiring enough picture of how the technology could radically transform the world for the better.”
Advertisement
Nonetheless, Amodei acknowledged that “the public has a negative view of AI” and he agreed that “this is a big problem.” Where he disagreed was with the idea that this is “primarily caused” by Amodei “or any other AI leader warning about AI’s risks.”
“I think it is fundamentally a crisis of trust,” Amodei said. “I think that ordinary people don’t trust companies, governments, or the tech industry and always suspect that we are cooking up some new way to screw them over.”
Indeed, “trust” is a word that often comes up in debates about the AI industry, especially around OpenAI CEO (and Amodei’s rival) Sam Altman. In Amodei’s telling, however, this is a crisis that’s been decades in the making, with the AI backlash “just the latest iteration of it.”
“I think by far the most accurate criticism of AI companies including Anthropic is that we haven’t yet delivered on our big promises to benefit the world,” Amodei said. “That is totally on us, and I think it’s the criticism you should be making, instead of all this stuff about messaging and marketing.” (Naturally, he also said Anthropic is “doing our best to fix this.”)
Advertisement
As for regulation, Amodei argued that Baker was painting “a false choice” between distributing AI widely without regulation, or concentrating the technology in the hands of a few companies through regulation.
“I know that there’s a sort of Silicon Valley shorthand where regulation = regulatory capture = concentration of power, but I’ve always found this to be an overly simplified picture of the world,” Amodei said. “Many people outside this bubble think of regulation as something that constrains corporate power and benefits ordinary people.”
Amodei added that he doesn’t “necessarily agree with that perspective either,” but he said that’s “why Anthropic has always made its policy proposals very carefully.”
“We try very hard to make proposals that disadvantage (slow down) frontier AI companies while *advantaging* smaller competitors,” he said.
Advertisement
2/2 Second, on the messaging around AI. I do not agree that my messaging has been disproportionately negative. In fact it has been about equally balanced between risks and benefits: I’ve written one major essay about each, and even in interviews where I discuss the risks, I…
Michael MJD picked up a decommissioned MoneyGram self-service kiosk PC that once sat in places like pharmacies, ready for customers to start money transfers or bill payments before heading to the counter. The unit arrived as a solid metal enclosure weighing around 60 pounds, built more like industrial equipment than a regular computer. An Elo DuraTouch resistive screen sat in front of a Dell monitor, with a card reader, speakers, wireless antenna, and a Belkin power strip riding along for the various ports. Power, USB, audio, ethernet, and display connections filled the back. It powered on by itself once electricity reached it, with no obvious external button needed.
The first time it booted, Windows Embedded Standard 7, a 2014 version, appeared to say hello, coupled with a MoneyGram splash screen. When you boot up offline, the system goes into maintenance mode. Once a network connection was established, the interface appeared, but the actual transfer feature had been blocked and replaced with some error messages. So you have two accounts to play with: kiosk admin and kiosk user. The touchscreen literally wouldn’t budge at first, and the card reader wouldn’t even let you swipe your card
2K IPS TOUCHSCREEN DISPLAY – 1920 x 1200 resolution delivers incredible detail, wide-viewing angles, and lifelike color reproduction
AMD RYZEN 3 30 PROCESSOR – Everyday performance you can count on; multitask, stream, game casually, and edit photos smoothly with responsive power and…
ENJOY UP TO 14 HOURS AND 15 MINUTES OF BATTERY LIFE – HP Fast Charge restores battery from 0 to 50% in approximately 45 minutes
It took some time to get around the lockdown. Hiren’s Boot CD, as well as the tried-and-true sticky keys method using sethc.exe, began to cause problems. Safe mode was the key that eventually enabled the administrator account and unlocked the entire desktop after logging in. When you finally got inside, the different things on the hard drive became much clearer, as the operating system and apps were all on a Transcend 2.5-inch 64 GB solid-state drive, you had 8 gigabytes of RAM split into two 4 GB modules, and the Intel Celeron J1900 quad-core processor was clocked at 1.99 GHz on a Gigabyte motherboard. Kaseya remote management software, Elo touch drivers, and the moneygram.exe app with all of its supervisor tools took up the majority of the drive space. The remaining storage was subsequently sorted using WinDirStat.
The touchscreen calibration would not stick no matter how many times you tried in normal or enhanced mode. What was strange was that the touchscreen worked perfectly while you logged in as an administrator, but when the kiosk software closed everything down, it simply stopped operating.
When all of the restrictions were finally lifted, a few older games were loaded up to get a sense of how the machine was handling. Half-Life ran at low resolution, but once the output was adjusted to direct, it played quite smoothly and with no jitter. Super Monkey Ball on the Dolphin emulator using the keyboard was still relatively playable; frame rates were fixed at 30-50, so it could handle a few light retro games without entirely going over.
Even if your hardware is secure, quantum-ready, encrypted, and future-proof, no one is immune to a supplier letting the side down
Cryptocurrency hardware wallet maker Trezor has confirmed that a breach at one of its shipping partners exposed the personal data of more than 13,000 customers.
The company’s initial findings suggested the breach was limited to orders placed in certain countries during the previous 90 days. New information indicates that earlier orders may also be affected.
Advertisement
The breach exposed the names, email addresses, phone numbers, and shipping addresses of 11,742 customers in the US, UK, Sweden, Colombia, Brazil, Italy, and Portugal who ordered Trezor products between May 10 and August 8.
An additional 1,947 customers had their names, home cities, and email addresses exposed. Some members of this group may have placed their orders before May 10.
“We are verifying this information and the timeframe with ShipMonk,” said Trezor.
ShipMonk is Trezor’s logistics partner. It stores and ships products on the company’s behalf and collects the information needed to fulfill orders.
Advertisement
ShipMonk is subject to Trezor’s 90-day retention policy, which requires partners to delete or anonymize customer data within 90 days of collecting it for an order.
ShipMonk did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
Trezor markets itself as a purveyor of secure, offline, hardware-based cryptocurrency wallets. With its products, it aims to shield customers from cyberattacks and malicious apps.
While it assured customers that its own systems and devices remain secure, Trezor warned that “affected customers could experience an increase in phishing attempts.”
Advertisement
The exposed details could help criminals craft convincing phishing attempts impersonating banks, crypto exchanges, or Trezor itself.
The company said it contacted affected customers directly and advised them to check any communications against information published through its official channels.
“Never enter your wallet backup on a website or share it with anyone,” Trezor said in an apologetic advisory.
“This is the first time since Trezor was founded in 2013 that we have experienced a breach that exposed customer phone numbers and shipping addresses.
Advertisement
“We absolutely understand how serious this is and the potential risks it poses to our customers and are deeply sorry to those affected.”
Trezor said in a supplementary social media post, separate from the advisory, that its “top priority” project at the moment is to establish an “Anonymous Delivery” option for customers.
The service will allow buyers to complete checkout without linking their home address or real-world identity to an order.
Customers using Anonymous Delivery will go through a dedicated checkout, use a nickname or label ID in place of a real name, and have their product shipped to an automated delivery locker instead of their home.
Advertisement
The delivery will also come in unbranded packaging with a generic sender label. The carrier will only use email or SMS to send a PIN for the locker.
Trezor said the service is gearing up for a September launch in the EU and by the end of the year in the US.
Alas, that didn’t stop Cake Wallet, a rival crypto wallet, from poking fun at Trezor.
“Another rough day for self custody,” it Xeeted, before suggesting crypto holders instead use an old smartphone with Cake Wallet installed because “there is no order, no shipping address, or customer data tied to the purchase.” ®
A 25% discount has hit AirPods 4 with ANC, delivering better-than-Prime Day pricing. Apple’s AirTag 2 is also marked down to $24.99, a 30-day low price.
Steeper AirPods 4 ANC price drop
Kicking off the Apple sale at Amazon is a steeper price drop on AirPods 4 with Active Noise Cancellation (ANC). Get the higher-end version from the 4th generation line for just $134.99, a discount of 25% off MSRP.
Russia is accelerating Rassvet faster than Ukrainian intelligence previously expected
Moscow plans to expand Rassvet into a 924-satellite constellation by 2035
Rassvet currently provides intermittent coverage rather than Starlink-level continuous connectivity
Russia is building its own satellite constellation, called Rassvet, at a pace that has outrun Ukrainian intelligence projections, experts have warned.
The program is intended to give Moscow the same kind of persistent, real-time coverage that Starlink has given Ukraine for over three years.
That capability shift is what now makes confrontation over these satellites appear difficult to avoid.
Latest Videos FromTechRadar
Advertisement
Why Russia’s satellite push raises the stakes
According to Major General Vadym Skibitskyi, deputy chief of Ukraine’s Defense Intelligence directorate, Russia had already placed 16 satellites into low Earth orbit as of March 2026.
He also claims that Moscow now plans for another 292 satellites by 2027, expanding further to 924 satellites by 2035.
“For now, the system can operate only intermittently, when a satellite passes over our territory,” Skibitskyi said.
That limitation means Rassvet currently functions as a proof of concept rather than an operational rival to Starlink.
Sign up to the TechRadar Pro newsletter to get all the top news, opinion, features and guidance your business needs to succeed!
Once completed, the constellation would let Russian forces coordinate drone strikes and share targeting data without depending on ground infrastructure.
Advertisement
Reliable satellite links are what currently allow Ukrainian drones to be piloted in real time across contested terrain.
A functioning Russian equivalent would remove the connectivity advantage that has favored Ukraine for most of the war.
Because electronic warfare cannot easily disrupt satellites the way it jams ground-based signals, countering Rassvet requires a different approach entirely.
Advertisement
Why neutralizing these satellites may become unavoidable
Skibitskyi confirmed that discussions are already underway within Ukraine’s defense establishment on how to respond once Rassvet matures, but offered no specifics on what form that response might take against the satellite network itself.
Eliminating the threat Rassvet poses would likely require disabling the satellites directly, since jamming alone cannot reach them – but that kind of action would extend the conflict into orbit, a domain neither side has directly fought in so far.
Russia’s satellite expansion overlaps with other reported upgrades, including turbojet-powered Geran-4 and Geran-5 attack drones, which drones accounted for roughly 50% of drones used in one recent reported strike, according to Ukrainian intelligence.
Advertisement
Moscow says it plans to produce 11,000 strike drones in August 2026 alone, as it shifts production toward these newer models.
It has also begun implementing mesh networking, a method enabling coordinated real-time control of drone swarms.
Both upgrades would depend heavily on the kind of persistent coverage Rassvet is designed to eventually provide.
At the moment, there is no independent verification of the specific satellite figures that Ukrainian intelligence is giving, and the Russian government or military has also not commented publicly on the recent development.
Advertisement
Ukraine’s ongoing review of its options suggests that any response to Rassvet will not remain confined to conventional territory.
Whether that response takes shape in orbit, on the ground, or through other means remains an open question for now.
You must be logged in to post a comment Login