Connect with us
DAPA Banner

Crypto World

Here are the five key takeaways from Wednesday’s Fed rate decision

Published

on

Watch CNBC's full discussion with the 'Federal Reserve' Panel

U.S. Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell speaks during a press conference following a two-day meeting of the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) on interest rate policy, in Washington, D.C., U.S., Jan. 28, 2026.

Jonathan Ernst | Reuters

The Federal Reserve wrapped up a two-day policy meeting Wednesday, delivering pretty much what the market expected and no major surprises from Chair Jerome Powell’s news conference. Here are five things worth remembering:

Advertisement
  1. The decision: To no one’s surprise, the rate-setting Federal Open Market Committee held its benchmark funds rate in a range between 3.5%-3.75%. The move broke a string of three straight cuts and could be a harbinger of a central bank not of a mind to ease again anytime soon.
  2. The dissents: As has been the custom for the past six months or so, multiple committee members broke ranks. This time, Governors Stephen Miran and Christopher Waller wanted another quarter percentage point cut. For Miran, though, it represented a bit of a turn as he deviated from three prior dissents in favor of half-point reductions.
  3. Powell’s post-meeting news conference was, in a word, a snoozer. On five separate occasions, the chair delivered variations on “I have nothing for you on that” to questions from reporters looking to bait him into commenting on the multiple political kerfuffles surrounding the Fed. Asked for the advice he would give his successor, Powell responded, “Stay out of elected politics.”
  4. From an economic standpoint, the FOMC statement and Powell’s commentary reflected expectations for solid growth, a near-term tariff-fueled boost for inflation that ultimately will recede, and a labor market in stasis as the labor force participation rate plus less immigration keep hiring in check while layoffs are also muted.
  5. And the markets yawned. With little to go on, the major stock averages closed little changed. Traders are still pricing in about a 60% chance of two additional, quarter percentage point rate cuts this year.

What they’re saying

“The Fed delivered a rate cut, but it arrived in a somewhat hawkish package. The Fed hasn’t shut the door on further cuts, but Chair Powell has raised the bar for further action. We expect the economy to grow at a solid pace next year, but it must be accompanied by job gains. The next round of jobs data may point to the exact opposite.” — Ellen Zentner, chief economic strategist for Morgan Stanley Wealth Management.

“It’s détente at the Fed for now. But a shakeup is coming with the new Fed Chair in May.” — Heather Long, chief economist at Navy Federal Credit Union.

“Perspectively speaking, we saw this meeting as an affirmation from the Fed of what investors were already thinking. Labor conditions are not worsening, growth has accelerated and inflation has steadied for now. To put it in other words, policy rates are much closer to neutral against the current backdrop and it’s time for a long pause.” — Charlie Ripley, senior investment strategist for Allianz Investment Management.

Watch CNBC's full discussion with the 'Federal Reserve' Panel

Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

Crypto World

Canada Eyes Ban on Crypto Political Donations

Published

on

Canada Eyes Ban on Crypto Political Donations

Canada’s federal government has proposed a total ban on cryptocurrency donations to political parties, citing concerns that foreign entities could exploit the technology to interfere in elections.

Known as the Strong and Free Elections Act, the bill was introduced on Thursday and proposed to amend the Canada Elections Act to prohibit political parties and third parties involved in the election process from accepting donations in crypto, money orders and prepaid cards to prevent anonymous and “hard to trace contributions.”

The bill’s sponsor, Steven MacKinnon, the leader of the government in the House of Commons, said in an X statement on Thursday that the measures are intended to block foreign interference and other threats to elections.

“With the introduction of the Strong and Free Elections Act, new investments to counter foreign threats and stronger government coordination, we are acting to ensure our elections remain free, fair and secure at all times,” he said.

Advertisement
Source: Steven MacKinnon 

Canada is not alone in its concerns. The UK government also announced plans for a moratorium on crypto donations on Thursday, following an independent review and pressure from senior politicians.

First attempt at banning crypto donations failed

The current Strong and Free Elections Act had its first reading in the House of Commons on Thursday. To become law, it must progress through several readings and a committee stage in that chamber, then pass through the Senate before reaching the Governor General of Canada for royal assent.

A similar bill was proposed in 2024 by Dominic LeBlanc, then minister of public safety, but it failed to advance past the second reading in the House of Commons and ultimately died.

Crypto political donations in Canada have been permitted since 2019 and are treated similarly to property donations. 

Related: Kalshi legal woes grow with Washington state gambling suit

Advertisement

However, a 2024 report by Stéphane Perrault, the chief electoral officer, recommended a ban on crypto political donations altogether on the grounds that it “poses challenges in identifying a contributor.”

Penalties could be up to twice the amount contributed

If the proposed legislation becomes law, contributions made using any of the banned payment methods must be returned, destroyed or delivered to the chief electoral officer. 

Penalties for violations could include up to twice the amount contributed, plus $25,000 for individuals and $100,000 for corporate entities.

The bill also proposes expanding existing bans on realistic deepfakes that impersonate electoral candidates to mislead voters. The issue gained attention in the lead-up to the 2024 US elections, with one reported case involving a deepfake of then-President Biden urging voters not to participate.

Advertisement

Magazine: How crypto laws changed in 2025 — and how they’ll change in 2026