However, the first office selection process is always made on the basis of cost, convenience of location, or even size of the office. Expensive mistakes are normally discovered much later on in the process.

Based on experience of working with myHQ Spaces and dealing with thousands of office enquiries, there is always the same set of common errors that are made. It is not about selecting the wrong kind of office space. It is about jumping too soon, comparing incomplete pricing, and making decisions on assumptions about the way the business will operate in two or three years’ time.

Mistake 1 — Treating the Quoted Rate as the Cost

The work area offered at £300 per desk monthly does not have to be £300. The VAT is generally levied at the current standard rate of 20% in the UK for all products and services, which implies that the £300 work area cost will amount to £360 inclusive of VAT. This will mean that for a team of five individuals, the cost will be £1,800 monthly or £21,600 annually.

The real issue is whether the figure presented gives you an indication of what is actually included. Room usage could be capped at a certain monthly allowance, with extra hours billed on a separate basis. Other services such as printing, storage, visitor access, out-of-hours access, car parking, etc., could fall outside the stated price. Some organizations quote the price inclusive of VAT, while others quote the price exclusive of VAT.

Mistake 2 — Committing to a Lease Before the Headcount is Settled

It may be wise to go for a traditional commercial lease in case the need for space is quite predictable; however, if you have an uncertain number of employees, it might not be worth pursuing. According to business.gov.uk, company leases usually last 10 to 15 years, although shorter leases have become quite common. It also mentions that break clauses can be negotiated, depending on the terms of the lease agreement.

The commitment goes beyond just paying the rent. There are other commitments involved, like fit-out charges, maintenance, and dilapidations if the property comes back to the landlord in bad shape. This implies that a business will pay rent for office space which it does not need anymore and also the cost to bring the property back into shape. Flexspace can thus be termed as an insurance premium. It involves paying more for each desk, but in doing so, one avoids betting on something that has not even happened yet.

Mistake 3 — Choosing Location by Prestige Instead of Hiring Pool

A premium business address may be impressive for websites and business cards, but it may not be a convenient place for your employees. The office should be in a place that can easily be reached by people through a manageable commute, especially where the expectation is that the staff will attend often. Business.gov.uk identifies proximity to the employees, customers, and transport links as important considerations for business premises.

Such logic does not apply only to London. An enterprise from Bristol could be interested in a centrally-located office, but discover that an office in a less central position will be better because it will be closer to where their primary customers reside. It can happen in Manchester, Birmingham, Leeds or Glasgow. Should an affordable office cost employees an additional 40 minutes of travel time, then the saving on rent becomes meaningless.

Mistake 4 — Taking Space Before It is Needed

The existence of an office might indicate that the company has matured to the next level, but this should not be the factor that determines when the commitment should take place. Should a majority of the staff work off-site, having an office rented five days a week might result in a lot of capacity going to waste. Day passes, membership options, and conference room facilities might serve as other solutions until it becomes clear how much office space is needed.

An alternative approach would be to first create the company, test the market, hire the staff, and then measure the working system that has developed. The reverse approach is very common; get into a big office and hope the people will follow. This gets the order of demand and costs backward. Should the process of hiring take longer than anticipated, then the company is saddled with an office expense without the required number of staff.

Mistake 5 — Not Comparing Like With Like

Two different office quotes may share the exact headline rate but actually signify two entirely different costs. One may consist of meeting room credits, Internet connection, receptionist service, and some utilities, whereas others may not. The deposit amount, set-up fee, notice period, and other such factors may also influence the cost of the agreement.

It is important to first ask all providers the same questions before making a comparison. Questions include: What is included in the price per month? What is excluded from the pricing? What is the deposit amount? What is the notice period? Are the meeting rooms included and, if yes, for how many hours? All of this information should be presented in a straightforward cost comparison on a monthly and annual basis. The goal is not to look for the lowest price per desk.

The Practical Sequence

Making the first decision in regard to the office is much simpler once you make the distinction between the headline price and the real commitment. You need to calculate the total cost including VAT and extras, and align the term of the lease agreement with your level of confidence regarding future staffing. The location should be chosen based on where your team could reasonably do its work, and not simply by looking at prestige factors. In any case, take the permanent space only if you really need it operationally.

https://www.business.gov.uk/invest-in-uk/expand-your-business-in-the-uk/guide/detailed-guides/find-the-right-location-and-premises/

This article was written by

Follow

Analyst’s Disclosure: I/we have a beneficial long position in the shares of DRD either through stock ownership, options, or other derivatives. I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it (other than from Seeking Alpha). I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.

Seeking Alpha’s Disclosure: Past performance is no guarantee of future results. No recommendation or advice is being given as to whether any investment is suitable for a particular investor. Any views or opinions expressed above may not reflect those of Seeking Alpha as a whole. Seeking Alpha is not a licensed securities dealer, broker or US investment adviser or investment bank. Our analysts are third party authors that include both professional investors and individual investors who may not be licensed or certified by any institute or regulatory body.

Yes. Corporate subscriptions are available for teams and organisations, with discounted rates as user numbers increase. Pricing starts from $1,625 + GST per user.
Get in touch
to discuss the right option for your organisation.

Business News subscriptions are used by executives, investors, consultants and professionals who need to stay informed and make better decisions about the WA market. When you subscribe you’ll get

• Unlimited access to WA’s most trusted business journalism
• Data & Insights — detailed profiles of WA companies, people, projects and deals
• MyBN — a personalised feed based on the companies, people and sectors you follow
• Special publications and industry reports
• Daily and weekly email newsletters

Data & Insights is a research tool built specifically for the WA market. It draws on more than 30 years of Business News reporting, updated regularly to reflect what’s happening now. Use it to:

• Look up detailed profiles of WA companies, including financials, directors and ownership
• Find decision-makers and track their career movements
• Research live and completed projects across WA industries
• Monitor deals, appointments and market activity
• Access industry rankings and league tables

Data & Insights is updated daily by our dedicated research team, which uses the latest announcements, ASX filings and editorial coverage to keep our person, company, list and project records up to date.

Business News welcome all opportunities to make our dataset accurate, complete and current, so if you have an update request, please email the team at
general@businessnews.com.au, and we’d be happy to assist.

MyBN
is part of every subscription. It’s your personalised view of Business News. You can follow the companies, people, sectors and projects that matter to you, and get a news feed and alerts tailored to your interests. You can save articles to read later and retain only what you need.

Only subscribers have full access to all content on the Business News website.

If staying informed about the WA economy is part of your job, and/or you’re looking for networking opportunities in WA, Business News is built for you.

Business News subscribers are:

• Executives and directors tracking competitors, clients and market movements
• Investors and advisers researching companies, deals and industry trends
• Consultants and professionals staying across sectors relevant to their clients
• Business owners looking for leads, context and market intelligence

Most Business News publications cover national or global markets. Business News is focused entirely on Western Australia, which means the journalism, the data and the intelligence are all built around WA companies, people and projects — not adapted from a national feed. Data & Insights, included with every subscription, combines more than 30 years of WA-specific editorial research with live business data. There’s no comparable product for the WA market.

The Morning Digest Email provides a comprehensive wrap of the major headlines, relevant to WA business, and includes with a snapshot of the overnight news covering oil, gold and ASX-listed companies.

The Afternoon Wrap Email focuses on the news covered by our team of journalists during the course of the working day, including exclusive stories and analysis, all of which relates to WA business and the local economy.

The BN Weekender Email contains a wrap of the Business News from the week that was, highlighting the top stories in each area of WA business.
Sign up for free.

We’re happy to help.
Get in touch
and our team will come back to you.

The FTSE 100 sportswear retailer saw like-for-like sales slip by 2.8 per cent in the six months to August

JD Sports has reported a decline in both revenue and profit in the first half of this year, as subdued consumer confidence in its crucial US market creates a “tough trading environment”.

Régis Schultz, chief executive of the so-called ‘King of Trainers’, said on Wednesday that he is “encouraged” by the progress towards his growth plan, while acknowledging that cost-of-living pressures are “weighing” on its core consumer.

The FTSE 100 group recorded a 2.8 per cent fall in like-for-like sales during the six months to August, while pre-tax profit tumbled by a fifth to £282m.

The retailer’s overall sales were pulled down by a four per cent decline in North America. The region represents the group’s largest market, making up 38 per cent of its sales.

JD’s performance in the region had been supported by the US tax refund season and new product launches at the beginning of the year, but trading has “softened” in recent months, as reported by City AM.

The drop in North American sales was attributed to “weaker consumer sentiment amidst the broader cost-of-living backdrop and deferred ‘back-to-school’ demand into August,” the group said.

“Footwear performance remained challenged, reflecting softness in end-of-cycle product lines and a promotional market,” the firm told shareholders.

However, JD highlighted a recovery in sales of outdoor products. Revenue in this category rose by 4.2 per cent to £743m across the group, compared with a 3.1 per cent drop in sales of branded JD items.

The retailer’s UK sales declined by 1.4 per cent during the period, although the group noted that its momentum has picked up in recent months.

JD recorded a three per cent sales uplift in the Asia Pacific region, which represents five per cent of its overall market.

Schultz, who earlier this year weathered an attempted boardroom coup by JD’s then-chairman, has been under mounting pressure from investors to provide concrete evidence that his growth strategy is bearing fruit.

Speaking on Wednesday, he acknowledged that JD Sports continues to grapple with “cost-of-living pressures” and fierce discounting from competitors.

However, he reassured investors: “By staying close to both our customers and our brand partners, and leveraging our growing own brand capability, we continue to lead with the right products, in the right places and at the right prices.”

The group scaled back its full-year profit forecast by £50m earlier in the year, but confirmed on Wednesday that it remains on course to deliver between £700m and £800m.

Earlier this week, JD Sports revealed it would make its debut in Mexico, with plans to open more than 140 stores next year through a local franchise partner.

“Mexico is a market with a large, highly engaged consumer base and a demographic profile which aligns strongly with JD’s unique position as a curator of footwear and apparel trends across sport, music and fashion,” the group had said.

Richard Chamberlain, an analyst at RBC Capital Markets, said JD’s earnings met analyst expectations, adding that it is delivering “strong” cash generation amid a “muted” market.

JD Sports shares dropped 3.5 per cent to 75p on Wednesday morning.

BOSTON — Social media influencer Braden Peters, known online as “Clavicular,” has been criminally charged in Massachusetts with raping a 17-year-old girl who told police she became heavily intoxicated after he gave her alcohol at his family’s Cape Cod home, according to court records reviewed by multiple news organizations.

Peters, 20, faces one count of rape, one count of administering a substance for sexual intercourse and one count of procuring alcohol for a person under 21, stemming from an alleged incident on May 23, 2025, in Chatham, Massachusetts. A clerk-magistrate found probable cause for the charges on September 4, and a criminal complaint was formally issued on September 8. The rape and drugging charges are felonies under Massachusetts law, while the alcohol-procurement charge is a misdemeanor.

According to the criminal complaint, the accuser told investigators she began communicating with Peters on Instagram, and that the two developed an online working relationship after he offered to help build her social media presence, later paying her to appear in “looksmaxxing” videos he streamed online. The complaint states that Peters arranged transportation for her to travel to his family’s residence in Chatham, a seaside town at the southeastern tip of Cape Cod, where she was greeted by his mother and grandmother upon arrival before going to his bedroom, where the two livestreamed together while drinking alcohol. According to a police report, the accuser said Peters knew she was 17 years old but instructed her to tell viewers of the livestream that she was 18 and that the vodka he had given her was actually water.

Peters, who lives in Florida and has not been taken into custody, is scheduled to be arraigned in Orleans District Court on October 14. His publicist did not immediately respond to requests for comment from multiple news outlets following the charges becoming public. A representative for Peters, in a statement obtained by NBC News, downplayed initial reporting on the charges and claimed Peters had not yet been formally served with an arrest warrant at the time.

Andrew Moss, an attorney representing the teenager, offered a brief statement when asked for comment. “We are not commenting at this time since the proper authorities are handling this,” Moss said.

The criminal charges follow a civil lawsuit filed against Peters in Florida earlier this year, which was later amended in June to include allegations of sexual battery tied to the same Cape Cod encounter described in the criminal complaint. That lawsuit separately alleges Peters later injected the accuser with a fat-dissolving substance during a subsequent livestream without her consent. The four-count civil complaint includes allegations of battery, fraud, intentional infliction of emotional distress and unauthorized use of the accuser’s name and likeness. It remains unclear from currently available court documents whether the woman named in the civil lawsuit is the same individual identified as the accuser in the criminal case, though a police report reviewed by The New York Times indicates the criminal charges stem from the same May 2025 incident described in the civil filing.

Peters’ attorneys have denied the allegations underlying the civil lawsuit, stating in a July court filing that the encounter was consensual and characterizing the lawsuit as an attempt to generate publicity. Peters has separately denied the criminal allegations, reposting images and videos on social platform X that he said documented his interactions with the accuser as part of his public response to the charges.

Peters built a substantial online following as the most prominent public face of “looksmaxxing,” an online trend focused on pursuing traditional physical attractiveness through often extreme methods. The practice traces its origins to the “involuntary celibate,” or “incel,” online subculture, a community made up primarily of men who believe society unfairly denies them romantic or sexual attention. Peters livestreams his daily activities on a near-continuous basis, frequently broadcasting from parties, clubs and social outings, drawing his largest followings on TikTok, Instagram and the streaming platform Kick, where he has amassed more than 400,000 followers.

This is not the only legal matter Peters has faced in recent months. He was arrested in Florida in March on a battery charge connected to a separate incident that occurred in February, according to the Osceola County Sheriff’s Office, which said it conducted its own investigation into that alleged battery.

If convicted on the rape charge in Massachusetts, Peters could face a maximum sentence of up to 20 years in prison, according to reporting on the case. The charges against Peters were first publicly reported by The Bulwark on Monday, ahead of broader coverage by national outlets including The Associated Press, CBS News and NBC News.

With Peters’ arraignment scheduled for next month and the parallel civil lawsuit still pending in Florida, the case is likely to continue drawing scrutiny both for its legal proceedings and for its implications within the broader online “looksmaxxing” community that Peters helped popularize.