Connect with us

Business

Europe’s Digital Independence Drive Is Finally Moving Beyond the Whiteboard

Published

on

Businesses that cut back on their offices during the pandemic are now scrambling to find larger premises as the return-to-office trend gathers pace – but prime space is in short supply.

Digital sovereignty has gone – relatively quickly – from being a niche policy interest, to a mainstream business consideration across multiple regions of the world.

One of the most outspoken players has been the European Union, with its Gaia-X initiative, a wave of binding regulation, and a series of high-profile procurement decisions.

The combination of these changes made it unequivocally clear that the question of who controls critical data infrastructure is no longer a theoretical debate. Awareness of what has actually changed (and what this change means in practice) is becoming increasingly relevant for any business working across borders.

From summits to something tangible

The first European Summit on Digital Sovereignty was convened in November 2025 with the initiative of France and Germany. It brought in politicians, regulators, and industry leaders with the goal of mapping out concrete commitments instead of position papers.

A joint task force on digital sovereignty was produced as a result of this summit, due to report back in 2026. Meanwhile, Gaia-X released its Trust Framework 3.0 that enabled federated trust structures across borders and sectors.

Advertisement

The figures revealed during this summit are more telling than the announcement itself. Gaia-X now counts more than 15 operational data spaces, which is a noticeable difference from the long list of projects that were previously only known as “in preparation.” Cloud Temple became the first provider that got certified at the highest sovereignty label of this initiative.

Corporate procurement has also begun to follow the same route. Airbus issued a tender worth more than €50 million to migrate mission-critical environments to a sovereign European cloud. BMW continues its expansion of the Catena-X data-sharing network. Germany’s armed forces have signed a seven-year-long contract with the purpose of using an open-source alternative to replace Microsoft 365.

While none of this can be treated as the EU being on par with the American hyperscalers, it is an indication of procurement decisions and infrastructure investments being made based on security concerns, not just policy statements.

Why “stored in Europe” is not the same as “sovereign”

There is an important distinction relevant to this topic: where data is stored physically is not the same as whose laws govern it.

Advertisement

For example, AWS launched a European Sovereign Cloud in Brandenburg in January 2026. It’s structured as a standalone German entity with EU-based executives and an investment fund of several billion euros behind it. On paper, it resembles exactly the kind of cloud storage European regulators have been looking for. In reality, the parent company of AWS is still American, meaning that the US CLOUD Act still applies – allowing US authorities to compel American companies to hand over data they control at any point in time.

The chief executive of Gaia-X has been very blunt on this topic, clearly stating that the highest level of sovereignty can only be achieved by providers that have their headquarters on European soil. If the service is run by a US company (even with European staff and data centers), it’s still subject to American legislation.

This single factor cannot be considered a mere technicality. It’s significant enough to be the difference between a compliance checkbox and a genuine answer to a question of who can access this data and under what authority.

What it means for business decisions

Sovereignty is no longer a question that can be stalled indefinitely from the business side. Not only the EU Data Act has been in force since September 2025, but there are also multiple sector-specific rules (such as DORA for finances and NIS2 for critical infrastructure) that are tightening the same constraints, as well. None of these regulations treat sovereignty as optional.

Advertisement

According to survey data from Germany’s Bitkom, there are already many businesses around the globe that want independence from foreign infrastructure but have not acted on these wishes yet, despite the trust in some foreign providers having fallen sharply recently. This specific gap between intention and action is exactly where all the rushed and expensive decisions come from – mostly under regulatory pressure instead of a considered timeline.

In this context, there are a few basic questions that are worth raising as early as possible from the business side: where does data actually reside, and under whose jurisdiction; what do existing cloud contracts say about data access requests from foreign authorities; and were a rapid migration away from a provider necessary, would it actually be possible?

The recovery question most discussions overlook

Most discussions about digital sovereignty work from determining where data lives day by day: including specific cloud providers, specific data centers, and the specific jurisdiction it works under. These are legitimate questions, but they address only the visible layer of a much deeper dependency.

Sovereignty, properly understood, also requires control over what an organisation can recover from when infrastructure fails – and this dimension is one that policymakers have been slower to address than the infrastructure and regulatory questions that tend to dominate the conversation.

Advertisement

The gap is significant. Regulatory frameworks such as the EU Data Act, NIS2, and DORA establish requirements around data residency, access controls, and operational resilience, but they leave the specifics of backup architecture and recovery sovereignty largely to individual organisations to determine. A business can be fully compliant on paper while remaining entirely dependent on a foreign vendor’s proprietary backup infrastructure – one it cannot fully audit, migrate away from, or recover independently in a crisis.

This is precisely the argument that backup and recovery vendors have begun to make recently. Swiss company Bacula Systems describes this logic as “sovereign recovery” – the idea that a sovereign cloud strategy at a given moment is only going to be as resilient as the recovery infrastructure it works under.

Whenever a backup data is stored in an environment the organization does not have a full control over, created using formats that are problematic migration-wise, or tied to the infrastructure of an individual vendor – the validity of sovereignty claims becomes significantly less absolute and may not hold up under real pressure.

Irrespective of whether or not a given vendor’s approach is going to suit a particular organization, the overall point still stands. Cloud provider selection has been dominating the sovereignty conversation, while the recovery layer has received a lot less scrutiny in comparison.

Advertisement

The whiteboard phase is over

None of these arguments mean that all the existing infrastructure should be disassembled overnight. No serious case is being made for businesses to sever all ties with their current “foreign” technology. However, it does increase the likelihood that businesses treating digital sovereignty as someone else’s problem are the ones that are most likely going to have to make some rushed decisions under regulatory pressure within the next year or two.

The policy debate has finally moved on from abstract principles to creating practical operational data spaces, substantial procurement tenders, and binding regulations. This change is the reason why most businesses cannot simply consider sovereignty as an optional topic – as they now have to think whether they have established where their data resides, who has access to it, and what they are going to recover from if the need to do so arises.

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

Business

Citizens & Northern director Katherine Shattuck buys $201 in stock

Published

on


Citizens & Northern director Katherine Shattuck buys $201 in stock

Continue Reading

Business

The Fed’s PCE Problem: Why Its Preferred Inflation Gauge Misreads The Economy

Published

on

The Fed's PCE Problem: Why Its Preferred Inflation Gauge Misreads The Economy

Infrastructure Capital Advisors (“Infrastructure Capital”) is a leading provider of investment management solutions designed to meet the needs of income-focused investors. Jay Hatfield is CEO and CIO of the investment team. Mr. Hatfield is the lead portfolio manager of the InfraCap Small Cap Income ETF (NYSE: SCAP), InfraCap Equity Income Fund ETF (NYSE: ICAP), InfraCap MLP ETF (NYSE: AMZA), Virtus InfraCap U.S. Preferred Stock ETF (NYSE: PFFA), InfraCap REIT Preferred ETF (NYSE: PFFR), and a series of private accounts. Infrastructure Capital frequently appears on or is quoted in Fox Business, CNBC, Barron’s, The Wall Street Journal, Yahoo Finance, TD Ameritrade Network, and Bloomberg Radio/TV. The team at Infrastructure Capital publishes a monthly market and economic report, quarterly commentaries, investing primers, and asset class and strategy research. In addition, Infrastructure Capital hosts a monthly webinar and attends industry conferences in an effort to provide educational investing resources.

Continue Reading

Business

JBS names Wesley Batista Filho as global CEO effective January

Published

on


JBS names Wesley Batista Filho as global CEO effective January

Continue Reading

Business

Discover the benefits of American-made glass packaging

Published

on

Discover the benefits of American-made glass packaging

Discover why brands trust American-made glass packaging for quality, supply and shelf appeal.

Continue Reading

Business

IVES: Dan Left Wedbush, What Now?

Published

on

IVES: Dan Left Wedbush, What Now?

IVES: Dan Left Wedbush, What Now?

Continue Reading

Business

Doctors Urge Adults To Get Tested For Lipoprotein(a), The ‘Sneaky’ Cholesterol Tied To Heart Risk Now

Published

on

Taco Bell

Cardiologists are urging adults to ask their doctors about a blood test that most people have never heard of, one that measures a genetically inherited form of cholesterol linked to heart attacks and strokes but left off the standard lipid panel most patients receive at routine checkups.

The substance, known as lipoprotein(a), or Lp(a), is a distinct cholesterol particle that circulates in the bloodstream and functions as a major independent risk factor for cardiovascular disease, according to Ryan Smith, a cardiologist at Orlando Health Heart and Vascular Institute. Unlike LDL cholesterol, HDL cholesterol and triglycerides, the three markers typically included in a standard lipid panel, Lp(a) is not part of routine bloodwork, meaning many people go years, or a lifetime, without knowing their level.

That gap in testing has drawn increasing attention from the medical community. In March, a coalition of medical organizations, including the American Heart Association, released updated cholesterol management guidelines recommending, for the first time, that every adult be tested for Lp(a) at least once in their lifetime. The test can be ordered by a primary care physician as an addition to a standard lipid profile or other routine bloodwork, and it is now largely covered by major insurance plans, removing what had previously been a financial barrier for many patients.

Roughly one in five people have an elevated Lp(a) level, according to figures cited by cardiologists, and like other forms of high cholesterol, it typically produces no symptoms until it contributes to a blockage that triggers a heart attack or stroke. An Lp(a) level above 125 nanomoles per liter, sometimes measured as 50 milligrams per deciliter, has been shown to raise the risk of heart disease and stroke, with that risk potentially doubling at levels around 250 nanomoles per liter, or 100 milligrams per deciliter.

Advertisement

Lp(a) poses a particular danger because of its molecular structure. Much like excess LDL cholesterol, elevated Lp(a) can accumulate in the arteries and contribute to atherosclerosis, a narrowing of blood vessels that restricts blood flow to vital organs. But because Lp(a) carries an additional protein component called apolipoprotein A, it tends to be stickier and more prone to forming fatty plaques than LDL cholesterol, according to Smith. The particle can also interfere with the body’s natural clot-breakdown process, potentially increasing the likelihood of blood clots, and it carries pro-inflammatory molecules that can damage the aortic valve and contribute to arterial hardening over time.

For decades, Lp(a) testing was left out of standard cholesterol guidance largely because there was little clarity on what patients or doctors could actually do about an elevated result, according to Jeffrey Berger, director of the Center for the Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease at NYU Langone Heart. Researchers still do not know definitively whether lowering Lp(a) levels reduces cardiovascular risk, though Berger said ongoing research and drug trials increasingly point toward that possibility. Because Lp(a) levels are driven almost entirely by genetics, they generally do not respond to the lifestyle changes, such as diet and exercise, that can meaningfully lower other types of cholesterol.

Even without a clear treatment pathway, physicians say the case for testing has become increasingly clear. Berger said a growing body of evidence has repeatedly shown how elevated Lp(a) raises the likelihood of a cardiac event, making it important for patients to know whether they carry the genetic risk factor so they can more aggressively manage the cardiovascular risks that are modifiable.

Certain populations face a higher likelihood of elevated Lp(a) levels, given the trait’s strong genetic basis. People of African or South Asian descent tend to show the highest rates, followed by white, Hispanic and East Asian populations, according to cardiologists. The American Heart Association specifically recommends testing for anyone with a family history of high Lp(a), a personal or family history of early cardiovascular disease, defined as before age 55 in men and before 65 in women, and those with familial hypercholesterolemia, an inherited condition that causes elevated LDL levels.

Advertisement

For most people, a single Lp(a) test provides a reliable, lifelong measure of risk, since the level typically remains stable over time, Smith said. Exceptions include people with thyroid disorders, a kidney condition called nephrotic syndrome, certain acute inflammatory conditions, and those who are pregnant or in menopause, all of which can temporarily elevate Lp(a) readings. Once those conditions resolve or are treated, Lp(a) levels generally return to their genetic baseline.

Because no treatments currently exist that meaningfully lower Lp(a) on their own, doctors recommend that people with elevated levels focus on aggressively managing other cardiovascular risk factors, particularly blood pressure, blood sugar and LDL cholesterol. Research suggests that lowering LDL by an additional 20 milligrams per deciliter or more below the standard target of 100 milligrams per deciliter can help offset some of the added risk associated with high Lp(a). The American Heart Association recommends at least 150 minutes of moderate-intensity physical activity per week, a diet rich in plant-based foods, avoiding smoking, maintaining a healthy weight, and getting seven to nine hours of sleep nightly as foundational steps for cholesterol management.

Patients with high Lp(a) are often prescribed statins to more aggressively lower LDL cholesterol, and some physicians may add ezetimibe, a non-statin medication that blocks cholesterol absorption in the small intestine and can modestly reduce Lp(a) as well. Others may prescribe a PCSK-9 inhibitor, a class of drug that helps the liver clear LDL cholesterol from the blood and may offer a modest reduction in Lp(a) levels; a newly approved oral version of the drug has shown efficacy comparable to the injectable PCSK-9 inhibitors already available.

Looking ahead, a new class of medications currently in late-stage clinical trials is designed to directly target the RNA responsible for producing lipoprotein(a) in the body. Early data suggests these drugs can meaningfully lower Lp(a) levels, though it remains unclear whether that reduction will translate into fewer heart attacks and strokes.

Advertisement

For now, physicians say the priority is simply raising awareness of the test itself. Smith said Lp(a) should be viewed as one piece of a broader conversation with a doctor about overall cardiovascular risk, one best raised as early as possible. “Prevention is really supreme in our field,” he said.

Continue Reading

Business

How Liquid Are Private-Credit Funds? It Depends How You Define ‘Liquidity’

Published

on

How Liquid Are Private-Credit Funds? It Depends How You Define ‘Liquidity’

Wealthy investors who piled into private-credit funds have spent months trying to cash out their shares and still can’t. Fund managers have sought to reassure them by highlighting the vehicles’ ample “liquidity” to meet redemptions and remain healthy.

It would help if everyone could agree on what that word actually means.

Copyright ©2026 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 87990cbe856818d5eddac44c7b1cdeb8

Continue Reading

Business

Crude oil stocks in US SPR fall to over four-decade low

Published

on

Crude oil stocks in US SPR fall to over four-decade low

The U.S. government’s Strategic Petroleum Reserve (SPR) is at its lowest level since 1983 as inventories that were already low before the Iran war come under increasing pressure.

Data released by the Department of Energy on Monday showed that the number of barrels of oil in the SPR declined by 6.1 million barrels last week, ending the week at 298.7 million barrels in inventory.

Advertisement

That is the lowest level in the EIA’s weekly data on SPR stocks since January 1983.

SPR inventories have fallen this year after President Donald Trump in March authorized the release of up to 172 million barrels in response to the impact of the Iran war on energy supplies, as Iranian attacks have slowed the flow of tanker traffic through the Strait of Hormuz.

TRUMP BLASTS BIG OIL FOR ‘MAKING TOO MUCH MONEY’

Empty oil storage units.

The Strategic Petroleum Reserve inventories fell to the lowest level since 1983 last week. (Brandon Bell/Getty Images)

The Trump administration announced the releases on March 11, 2026, while EIA data shows that the SPR had about 415.4 million barrels of oil in inventory during the middle of March – with inventories now down about 116 million barrels as of early August.

Advertisement

The latest SPR releases follow a historic drawdown over the last several years, beginning with the release of 180 million barrels that was authorized by the Biden administration in response to Russia’s invasion of Ukraine in early 2022.

Inventories had been around 600 million barrels at the start of 2022 and fell to 375 million barrels by the end of the year. 

FORGET GASOLINE: THIS OVERLOOKED FUEL COULD RAISE THE PRICE OF NEARLY EVERYTHING YOU BUY

Strategic Petroleum Reserve

The Strategic Petroleum Reserve was established in response to the oil shocks of the 1970s. (Luke Sharrett/Bloomberg via Getty Images)

When SPR levels hit a low of about 347 million barrels in the summer of 2023, they began to gradually recover and reached 400 million barrels in May 2025. They hit a recent peak of over 415 million barrels in February, before the latest round of drawdowns began in March.

Advertisement

The SPR was created in 1975 under the Energy Policy and Conservation Act in response to the OPEC oil embargo of 1973-74, which was imposed by Arab countries in OPEC as retaliation for the U.S. resupplying Israel’s military during the Yom Kippur War.

The SPR was initially intended to have a capacity of 1 billion barrels of oil, although it never reached that level. Currently, the SPR has a congressionally-authorized maximum of about 714 million barrels of oil, while its highest ever inventory was 726.6 million barrels in December 2009 when it had an authorized capacity of 727 million barrels. 

US OIL RESERVES DROP TOWARDS REAGAN-ERA LOWS, ‘SIGNIFICANT IMPACT AT THE PUMP’ COMING, EXPERTS WARN

Worker at the Strategic Petroleum Reserve

A contractor works on a crude oil pipeline at the Department of Energy’s Bryan Mound Strategic Petroleum Reserve in Freeport, Texas. (Luke Sharrett/Bloomberg via Getty Images)

SPR reserves are stored at four locations thousands of feet below ground in salt caverns because those geological formations are more advantageous than surface facilities in terms of cost and maintenance, in addition to environmental and security concerns.

Advertisement

Geological pressures naturally seal cracks that emerge in salt formations to prevent leaking oil from seeping out, while the temperature difference keeps oil circulating to maintain its quality. Salt caverns can also be enlarged to fit precise dimensions through a mining process in which the salt is dissolved using fresh water.

The Government Accountability Office (GAO) issued a report in May which warned that Congress and the Department of Energy need to develop a unified long-term plan to address the SPR’s maintenance needs and a strategy for managing inventories into the future.

GET FOX BUSINESS ON THE GO BY CLICKING HERE

The One Big Beautiful Bill Act, which Republicans in Congress and Trump enacted in July 2025, included $171 million for acquiring petroleum products to be stored in the SPR, as well as $218 million to maintain the SPR.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Business

Rubrik stock hits 52-week high at 99.76 USD

Published

on


Rubrik stock hits 52-week high at 99.76 USD

Continue Reading

Business

Hypoport H1 2026 slides: EBIT jumps 20% as margins expand

Published

on


Hypoport H1 2026 slides: EBIT jumps 20% as margins expand

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2025