In the past 24 hours, Bitcoin was up 0.2% and Ethereum was up 1% to trade at $64,162 mark. Among the major altcoins, BNB, XRP, Solana, Tron, Hyperliquid, Cardano fell up to 2% whereas Dogecoin was up 0.4%. The global crypto market capitalisation was up 0.1% to $2 trillion, according to CoinMarketCap.

Also Read |Mutual fund SIP stoppage ratio slows to 91% in June as new SIP registrations outpace closures Riya Sehgal, Research Analyst, Delta Exchange said Bitcoin is holding near the $64,000 region despite $95.3 million of net outflows from U.S. spot Bitcoin ETFs on July 9, while Ethereum ETFs recorded $52.2 million of outflows.

Sehgal further said that technically, Bitcoin needs a sustained four-hour close above $64,000 to open the $65,000–$66,800 resistance zone, while a break below $62,300 could expose $61,200.

Live Events

In the past week, Bitcoin and Ethereum were both up 3% respectively. Among the major altcoins, BNB and Tron were up 1% and 2% respectively. Among the major altcoins, XRP, Solana, Hyperliquid, Dogecoin, and Cardano fell up to 6%.
Nischal Shetty, Founder, WazirX said crypto markets traded in a narrow range this week as Bitcoin recovered from the $60K zone to end near $64K, while Ethereum held around $1,770 with stronger momentum.Renewed spot ETF inflows, improving technical indicators, and rising futures activity supported sentiment, though traders continued watching key support and resistance levels, Shetty further said.

Also Read | Why investors are pouring money into midcap and smallcap mutual funds again

Harish Vatnani, Head of Trade, ZebPay said Bitcoin is still struggling to break above the $64,200 mark despite the recovery from the bottom zone. The daily RSI sustaining above 50 level, indicating that the broader market sentiment is recovering.

The crypto market liquidations total $153 million over the past 24 hours, Vatnani further said.

(Disclaimer: Recommendations, suggestions, views and opinions given by the experts are their own. These do not represent the views of The Economic Times)

If you have any mutual fund queries, message on ET Mutual Funds on Facebook/Twitter. We will get it answered by our panel of experts. Do share your questions on ETMFqueries@timesinternet.in along with your age, risk profile, and Twitter handle.

When Malcolm Glazer completed his takeover of Manchester United in 2005, he became the first American ever to own a Premier League club.

Twenty years on, he looks less like an outlier than an opening act. Heading into the 2025-26 season, thirteen of the league’s twenty clubs carried at least some American money on their share registers, and around half were majority-controlled by US individuals, families or private equity groups. The world’s richest football league has quietly become one of the most coveted assets in American sport.

That surge of cross-Atlantic capital has reshaped far more than the boardroom. It has fed a vast commercial machine around every fixture — broadcasting, sponsorship and the tightly regulated betting market that now sits alongside the UK game, where supporters comparing licensed bookmakers can find out more through comparison sites such as Betiton. For business observers, though, the sharper question is why so much American money has landed on English football in the first place — and what Britain’s new football regulator intends to do about it.

The rise of American owners in the Premier League

The trajectory is stark. Before the Glazers, the English top flight had never had an American owner; today US investors are spread the length of the table. Stan Kroenke, whose sprawling empire also takes in NFL, NBA and NHL franchises, controls Arsenal. Fenway Sports Group, led by John Henry, owns Liverpool. Aston Villa’s V Sports vehicle is co-led by the American financier Wes Edens. And the pace has quickened sharply in recent years: Todd Boehly’s consortium bought Chelsea for £4.25bn in 2022, Bill Foley’s Black Knight group took full control of Bournemouth later that year, and Dan Friedkin — already the owner of Roma — completed a takeover of Everton in 2024, moving the club into a new riverside stadium for this season. Most of those thirteen American stakes have been built since 2008.

Why US investors keep buying English football

For a business audience, the logic is not hard to follow. America’s major leagues — the NFL, NBA, MLB and NHL — are closed shops. There is no promotion or relegation, the number of teams is fixed, and incumbent owners rarely sell. Buying into the NFL, football-finance analysts point out, can cost somewhere between $5bn and $10bn, pricing out all but a handful of buyers. English football offers an alternative: global reach, an open pyramid and, crucially, valuations that still look modest by American standards.

Newcastle United is the clearest illustration. Ranked by Forbes among the most valuable clubs in the Premier League and inside the top twenty worldwide, the club was recently valued at less than the Columbus Blue Jackets — the lowest-valued franchise in the NHL — despite carrying several times the social-media following and playing in a stadium nearly three times the size. To American investors, that gap reads as opportunity: a globally recognised brand they believe has been run conservatively and, in the industry’s phrase, left unsweated. The Premier League’s international broadcasting income, still climbing, is the engine they are buying into.

Ticket prices, the Super League and the fan backlash

The influx has not been universally welcomed. American ownership has coincided with steep rises in ticket prices, and supporters’ groups have pushed back hard. The Arsenal Supporters’ Trust has characterised the trend as a model of squeezing ever more revenue out of fans, and organised protests have flared at Manchester United, Liverpool and Everton across the past two seasons. The deepest wound remains the 2021 European Super League, when six English clubs — several of them American-owned — tried to break away into a closed competition, only to retreat within days amid a furious backlash from supporters and government alike.

Beneath the anger lies a wider argument about where football’s money ends up. While billions flow through the top flight, the grassroots game continues to scrap for funding — a contrast that critics of the modern ownership model return to again and again.

What the new football regulator means for owners

The politics of all this have now hardened into law. The Football Governance Act 2025 received Royal Assent in July 2025 and created an Independent Football Regulator with statutory powers over the top five tiers of the English men’s game. For prospective owners — American or otherwise — the most consequential change is a new suitability test that scrutinises the source and sufficiency of their funds, alongside their honesty, integrity and competence. Every club will also need an operating licence to compete from the 2027-28 season, and will have to seek the regulator’s approval before relocating a stadium, altering its badge or primary colours, or borrowing against its ground.

The regulator, led by a former Financial Conduct Authority director, has signalled an interventionist stance and has already agreed to share information with the FCA. Its remit runs from club-level financial soundness to the heritage of the game itself — a direct response to years of collapses, mismanagement and the Super League affair. For US investors accustomed to lightly regulated, closed leagues at home, English football is about to become a more closely policed place to own a business.

What happens next

None of this looks likely to stem the flow of American money in the near term; the underlying maths that makes English clubs attractive has not changed. What is changing is the environment around the assets: tighter regulation, more assertive supporters and a commercial ecosystem — broadcasting, sponsorship and the regulated betting market tracked by comparison platforms such as Betiton — that keeps expanding in value. For the new wave of American owners, the challenge is no longer simply buying into the Premier League. It is proving they can run it in a way that fans, and now a regulator, will accept.

Matthews said he bought several of the devices to see whether they performed as advertised.

The civil engineer and content creator said rather than buying something that would bring the temperature of his room down quickly, he found he had instead bought some “cheap components” made using “flawed science”.

One advert described the product as a “reverse-engineered aircon unit” featuring “a liquid-compressed cooling cartridge”.

Matthews said the device actually contained “a load of cardboard fins that get wet as the water blows past them”.

While so-called “swamp coolers” – machines that chill air by evaporating water – do work reasonably well in hot, dry climates, they also increase humidity and so are much less effective in humid places like much of the UK.

They are also not conventional air conditioners, which work by removing heat from a room via an exhaust hose or external unit.

“I really feel for the people that have been sucked into buying some of this rubbish,” Matthews said.

“While we’ll continue to take action where we see the rules being broken, the nature of some of the businesses behind these ads means enforcement alone isn’t enough to stop the problem,” said the ASA.

Although the watchdog regulates paid-for adverts on platforms including YouTube and Facebook, it cannot issue fines itself.

This article was written by

Follow

Analyst’s Disclosure: I/we have a beneficial long position in the shares of HPQ either through stock ownership, options, or other derivatives. I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it (other than from Seeking Alpha). I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.

Seeking Alpha’s Disclosure: Past performance is no guarantee of future results. No recommendation or advice is being given as to whether any investment is suitable for a particular investor. Any views or opinions expressed above may not reflect those of Seeking Alpha as a whole. Seeking Alpha is not a licensed securities dealer, broker or US investment adviser or investment bank. Our analysts are third party authors that include both professional investors and individual investors who may not be licensed or certified by any institute or regulatory body.

Shares of Meta Platforms jumped Friday, trading at $667.81, up $36.33, or 5.75 percent, extending a hot stretch for the stock as investors continued reacting to signs that the company’s massive artificial intelligence infrastructure spending may be significantly more cost-efficient than previously estimated.

Note: This article is intended to provide factual context and does not constitute financial advice. Readers should consult a licensed financial advisor before making investment decisions.

Friday’s gains build on a rally that has pushed Meta shares up roughly 15 percent over the past week. According to Bank of America analyst Justin Post, an internal Meta memo reviewed by Reuters suggests the company could expand computing capacity considerably more efficiently than Wall Street had modeled. Post reiterated a Buy rating on the stock with an $835 price target, noting that Meta’s projected capital spending of roughly $145 billion implies construction costs near $22 billion per gigawatt, well below Bank of America’s earlier estimate of approximately $45 billion per gigawatt. If accurate, Post said, the figures could meaningfully ease investor concerns about the scale of Meta’s AI investment program. Meta expects to deploy approximately 6.5 gigawatts of AI compute capacity during 2026, including 5.5 gigawatts in the second half of the year.

The renewed enthusiasm follows a broader strategic shift Meta has signaled in recent weeks. Chief Executive Mark Zuckerberg confirmed at the company’s annual shareholder meeting that launching a dedicated AI cloud business is “definitely on the table,” a move that would allow Meta to rent out excess computing capacity to outside developers rather than using it exclusively for its own products. According to reporting cited by the Motley Fool, the initiative, internally referred to as Meta Compute, would position the company to offer both hosted AI models, similar to Amazon Web Services’ Bedrock, and raw compute rental, similar to specialized providers like CoreWeave. Analysts have said the shift would help transform what had been viewed as a purely defensive cost center into a potential new revenue stream, positioning Meta as a fourth major U.S. hyperscaler alongside Amazon, Microsoft and Google.

Meta has continued backing that strategic pivot with tangible product announcements. On July 9, the company unveiled Muse Spark 1.1, described as its most advanced AI model to date, targeting the fast-growing agentic and coding software market in direct competition with offerings from Anthropic and OpenAI. According to Investing.com, that launch represented the clearest near-term signal yet that Meta is translating its enormous AI spending into tangible commercial products, helping the stock recover from levels well below its 52-week high of $796.25. Meta is also incorporating its Muse Image model into its Advantage+ advertising platform, adding visual reasoning and self-refinement capabilities aimed at improving automated ad creative for marketers.

On the hardware side, Meta plans to begin manufacturing its custom AI chip, code-named Iris, with partners Broadcom and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing later this year. Bank of America has said the chip initiative is unlikely to explain the near-term cost improvements reflected in the internal memo, but could strengthen Meta’s long-term AI strategy as part of a broader custom silicon roadmap extending into 2027 and beyond. Meta has also continued expanding its physical data center footprint, recently breaking ground on its first Canadian facility, a roughly 13 billion Canadian dollar AI-focused campus in Sturgeon County, Alberta, expected to generate approximately 3,000 construction jobs and more than 300 permanent positions once operational.

Financial markets have responded favorably to the broader shift. According to 247 Wall St., prediction market platform Polymarket was pricing a 98 percent probability of an up day for Meta shares on July 10, with an 82 percent probability the stock would reach $680 by the end of the month. The stock currently trades at a forward price-to-earnings ratio of roughly 20 times, and investors are now closely watching Meta’s second-quarter earnings report, scheduled for July 29, where management has guided for revenue between $58 billion and $61 billion. Analysts will be watching that call closely for any formal confirmation of an AI compute rental business, along with further detail on the company’s broader monetization strategy.

Meta’s first-quarter 2026 results, reported earlier this year, showed the strength underpinning the current rally. The company posted $56.31 billion in sales, up 33 percent year over year, with GAAP net income of approximately $26.77 billion and earnings per share of $10.44, far exceeding analyst expectations of roughly $6.67. Profit margins stood at 41 percent, and the company’s core Facebook and Instagram advertising business generated roughly $55 billion of that total revenue. According to FX Leaders, Meta is projected to surpass Google this year to become the world’s largest digital advertising company, with eMarketer forecasting Meta’s 2026 ad revenue at approximately $243.46 billion, compared with $239.54 billion for Google.

Not every recent development has been favorable for the stock. According to CNN, the European Union recently found that the design of Instagram and Facebook violates the bloc’s Digital Services Act over allegedly “addictive” design features, a finding that could expose Meta to fines potentially reaching into the billions of dollars. Meta has pushed back forcefully against related litigation, describing certain proposed legal damages tied to separate cases as “unprecedented” and totaling as much as $1.4 trillion, according to CNN’s reporting. Citizens Bank also lowered its price target on Meta shares to $800 from $825 this week, even as the firm maintained a generally constructive view of the stock. Analysts at 24/7 Wall St. have noted that the combination of a genuinely improved capital expenditure story and a real regulatory overhang means investors should weigh both realities carefully, describing the bull case for Meta as “cheaper to underwrite” following recent developments, even as the bear case tied to European regulatory risk has grown “more expensive to ignore.”

Investment firm ARK Invest, led by Cathie Wood, purchased 34,000 additional shares of Meta on Thursday, according to CNN, extending a pattern of active portfolio adjustments the firm has made involving major AI infrastructure stocks in recent months.

With Meta’s AI cloud ambitions still in relatively early stages and formal details of any compute rental offering yet to be confirmed on an earnings call, investors are likely to continue closely monitoring both the company’s July 29 second-quarter results and any further regulatory developments out of the European Union as key factors shaping the stock’s trajectory through the remainder of the summer.

This year’s federal budget deficit is now outpacing last year’s as federal spending is growing at a faster rate than tax revenue, pushing the annual shortfall closer to $2 trillion.

The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office (CBO) on Thursday released its monthly budget review for the month of June, which showed the FY2026 deficit was $1.373 trillion through the first nine months of the fiscal year.

That represents a $35 billion increase in the budget deficit compared with the same period a year ago. The larger deficit was the result of a larger increase in federal spending, which is up $178 billion from a year ago while tax receipts have risen $142 billion.

Increased spending was primarily driven by the cost of servicing the federal government’s more than $39 trillion national debt as well as rising expenses for the government’s three largest mandatory spending programs – Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid.

US NATIONAL DEBT SURPASSES SIZE OF THE ECONOMY FOR FIRST TIME SINCE WORLD WAR II

The federal budget deficit for FY2026 surpassed the prior year’s shortfall in the CBO’s June budget update. (Kevin Carter/Getty Images)

Net interest on the national debt was the largest category of increased spending in the first nine months of FY2026 and rose $98 billion compared with the same period a year ago, an increase of 13%. This was caused by the growth in the size of the national debt, as well as higher long-term interest rates – though some declines in short-term rates mitigated some of the total increase.

Social Security was the next largest driver of the increased spending, with benefit payments up $62 billion, or 5%, from a year ago due to higher average benefits and a larger number of beneficiaries. The CBO noted the increase would’ve been larger but for onetime retroactive payments that began in March 2025 under the Social Security Fairness Act.

Medicare spending rose $58 billion from a year ago, an 8% increase, due to higher enrollment and higher payment rates for healthcare services provided through the program. Medicaid spending was up $49 billion, or 10%, which was largely attributed to rising costs per enrollee.

FEDERAL BUDGET DEFICIT PROJECTED TO HIT $2 TRILLION THIS FISCAL YEAR, RANKING AMONG LARGEST IN US HISTORY

Increased tax revenues were driven mostly by higher receipts of individual income and payroll taxes, which combined to rise by $169 billion, or 5%, despite income tax refunds rising by $31 billion, or 10%, due to the One Big Beautiful Bill Act.

Customs duties – a category which includes tariffs – were up $55 billion from a year ago. That amounts to an increase of 51%, which CBO attributed to President Donald Trump’s executive actions that raised tariffs on U.S. trading partners.

However, tariff refunds began to be paid following a Supreme Court ruling in February that struck down some of the tariffs, which reduced tariff revenues by about $70 billion in May and June.

Tariff refunds were paid out in May and June that decreased the funding the federal government received from import taxes. (STR/AFP/Getty Images)

US NATIONAL DEBT BREACHES $39 TRILLION MILESTONE FOR FIRST TIME AMID SPENDING SURGE

Maya MacGuineas, president of the nonpartisan Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget (CRFB), noted in a statement that this year’s deficit has now surpassed the prior year’s deficit and it’s “likely to stay that way for the rest of the fiscal year.”

“We will likely borrow $2 trillion or more this fiscal year – an astounding figure given that the economy keeps growing and unemployment is low,” she explained. “This is likely the tip of the iceberg; borrowing will soar if policymakers fail to get our entitlements under control, enact further unpaid-for tax cuts or spending increases, and otherwise ignore the need to cut spending and increase revenues.”

MacGuineas noted that Social Security and Medicare are within seven years of exhausting their trust funds, which would trigger across-the-board benefit cuts to both programs, and urged lawmakers to take steps to rein in federal budget deficits.

GET FOX BUSINESS ON THE GO BY CLICKING HERE

“None of this is normal. Policymakers should instead be targeting a much more sustainable deficit at 3% of GDP, putting together a bipartisan commission to address our fiscal situation and entitlements, and perhaps most importantly, being honest with the public about the grave dangers we face by remaining on this unsustainable path,” she added.