Available for over a year

The UK’s private rental market has grown dramatically over recent decades, creating what often feels like a tale of two nations: ‘Generation Rent’ who are priced out of home ownership and unable to access social housing; and buy-to-let investors who view property as a reliable income stream or pension plan.

Rising rents, poor conditions and fierce competition for homes have fuelled frustration with landlords, prompting political efforts to strengthen protections for tenants and increase tax pressure on property owners.

Now the sector is facing a turning point – with large institutional investors, backed by pension funds, for example, playing an increasing role. Evan Davis and guests discuss the state of the UK rental market and where it might be heading.

Guests:
Ashley Winston, Director of Palmdale Car Finders
Andy Graham, Host, HMO Podcast
Polly Simpson, Head of multi-family development at Savills

Production team:
Presenter: Evan Davis
Producer: Sally Abrahams
Production Co-ordinator: Katie Morrison
Sound engineers: Ben Andrews and Tim Heffer
Editor: Matt Willis

The Bottom Line is produced in partnership with The Open University

Programme WebsiteShow less

When the Dow Jones Industrial Average crossed 50000 for the first time this month, President Trump celebrated and predicted it would be double that by the end of his term.

In China, officials have had a different reaction to the country’s own stock-market boom. A group of state-linked investors has stepped in, unloading holdings to cool things down. 

Copyright ©2026 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 87990cbe856818d5eddac44c7b1cdeb8

To the Editor:
The new robotic industry may have some surprise funding sources (“The Robot Revolution Is Real. Tesla, Hyundai, and More Stocks to Play It,” Cover Story, Feb. 6). For example, long-term care insurance may cover the cost of robots for home healthcare associated with daily-living activities for the elderly. The longer we can keep people in their homes, the better the quality of life and the longer expensive assisted-living centers can be put off. Robots, self-driving cars, and home delivery of groceries and goods should, in theory, reduce the cost of caring for aging people. Lawn care and landscaping may be one of the first service industries to be disrupted by robotics.

India’s recent trade agreements mark more than incremental policy changes. They signal a strategic repositioning. India is no longer competing only on cost or capability; it is competing on market access. For a country that runs a structural current account deficit driven by energy and electronics imports, export competitiveness becomes central to macro stability. The real challenge, therefore, is not reducing imports but funding them sustainably. Exports remain India’s most dependable answer.

Global trade today is intensely competitive. Countries that combine lower production costs with preferential tariff access capture supply chains quickly. Even small tariff differences can gradually shift sourcing decisions. If a competing manufacturing hub offers similar quality at lower cost and enjoys better tariff access, global buyers will move. India’s industrial and services capabilities are globally competitive; what increasingly determines success is whether exporters compete on equal terms.

India’s approach to trade partnerships is undergoing a subtle but important evolution. The country is no longer negotiating trade agreements from a position of vulnerability, but from a position of capability. Recent engagements with major economic blocs, including the United States, the UK and the European Union, reflect this shift. Preferential access to large consumption markets such as Europe strengthens export visibility and industrial scale.

Improved tariff alignment with the United States enhances competitiveness in sectors directly linked to global manufacturing realignment. Collectively, these agreements are gradually repositioning India from being primarily a consumption-led economy to becoming an increasingly important participant in global production networks.

Securing competitive access

The India-EU trade agreement brings India into deeper economic engagement with a bloc that includes major industrial powerhouses such as Germany, France, Italy, Spain and the Netherlands and significantly expands India’s global trade integration by providing preferential market access for most exports. Given that India and the EU together account for roughly 25% of global GDP and a third of world trade flows, the pact marks a structural milestone in India’s journey toward export competitiveness and deeper global capital alignment.

Improved tariff parity can drive tangible outcomes:

• Higher export volumes in labour-intensive sectors
• Greater participation in the US friend-shoring supply chains
• Increased manufacturing scale and employment

India’s tariff position is now broadly comparable to that of other major exporting economies supplying the US. In labour-intensive sectors such as textiles and leather, where even marginal cost differences matter, the earlier tariff disadvantage has narrowed significantly. In global trade, sourcing decisions are often made on narrow margins. India is now firmly on equal footing, competing on capability rather than tariff differential.

Markets prefer visibility

Recent tariff clarity coincided with renewed FII inflows of approximately USD 1.7 billion, highlighting how trade visibility influences capital allocation decisions. Stronger export momentum is increasingly shaping earnings quality and market valuations.
Export-oriented businesses typically demonstrate better earnings visibility and natural currency support during periods of rupee weakness. Export-heavy sectors such as IT and pharmaceuticals reflect this trend, with Nifty IT trading at 24-25x P/E and Nifty Pharma at c.30x, compared with discounted valuations in commodity cyclicals.

Few sectors illustrate India’s export transformation more clearly than electronics manufacturing. Not too long ago, India was largely a consumption market for global electronics brands. Today, it is emerging as a major production hub. Electronics exports have climbed to USD 48.2 billion in 2025, moving from seventh to third among India’s export categories. Yet India’s export-to-GDP ratio remains c.21%, well below several Asian manufacturing economies – highlighting the scale of opportunity ahead.

Over the past year, FPI flows into Indian equities have turned volatile. After strong inflows through 2023-24, India saw net FPI outflows of nearly USD 17-18 billion in 2025 as global liquidity tightened and US yields moved higher. Even in early 2026, flows have remained uneven, with brief inflow spurts followed by profit-taking.

For an economy managing a current account deficit driven by oil and electronics imports, strong export growth reduces dependence on unpredictable capital flows. It strengthens foreign exchange reserves, supports currency stability and enhances macro credibility. For investors, that stability matters. This is one reason export-oriented sectors such as IT services and pharmaceuticals have historically commanded premium valuations relative to purely domestic cyclicals.

A clear strategic shift

If India intends to sustain high growth while managing external stability, trade integration will be important. India is gradually moving from protection-led caution to competitiveness-led integration. At a time when global supply chains are being redefined, this shift is timely.

Trade agreements do three important things: First, they improve export competitiveness and protect market share. Second, they strengthen foreign exchange management by expanding stable earnings. Third, they enhance India’s attractiveness as a global manufacturing and services partner.

These agreements reflect India’s aspiration to lead, to compete, and to be counted among the world’s most open, dynamic, and forward-looking economies. The message is clear: the world is opening its markets to India. It’s time for us to step forward and lead from the front.

(The author, Neerja Ajit, is Vice President at NovaaOne)

(Disclaimer: Recommendations, suggestions, views, and opinions given by experts are their own. These do not represent the views of The Economic Times.)

This article was written by

Analyst’s Disclosure: I/we have no stock, option or similar derivative position in any of the companies mentioned, and no plans to initiate any such positions within the next 72 hours. I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it (other than from Seeking Alpha). I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.

Seeking Alpha’s Disclosure: Past performance is no guarantee of future results. No recommendation or advice is being given as to whether any investment is suitable for a particular investor. Any views or opinions expressed above may not reflect those of Seeking Alpha as a whole. Seeking Alpha is not a licensed securities dealer, broker or US investment adviser or investment bank. Our analysts are third party authors that include both professional investors and individual investors who may not be licensed or certified by any institute or regulatory body.

WSJ ProFeb. 13, 2026 6:14 pm ET

Los Angeles County accused American Industrial Partners of conspiring to monopolize the market for firetrucks, alleging the private-equity firm’s tactics led to shortages and high prices. 

The county on Thursday brought the antitrust lawsuit against the private-equity firm and Rev Group, a firetruck manufacturer AIP formed two decades ago, as well as Pierce Manufacturing and its parent company, Oshkosh Corp., which aren’t affiliated with private equity. The case was filed in the U.S. District Court in Los Angeles.

Copyright ©2026 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 87990cbe856818d5eddac44c7b1cdeb8