Connect with us
DAPA Banner
DAPA Coin
DAPA
COIN PAYMENT ASSET
PRIVACY · BLOCKDAG · HOMOMORPHIC ENCRYPTION · RUST
ElGamal Encrypted MINE DAPA
🚫 GENESIS SOLD OUT
DAPAPAY COMING

Business

Hotel at one of Newport’s biggest regeneration schemes could be forced to close warns developer

Published

on

Business Live

Garrison Barclay Estates said the award winning Mercure hotel at Chartist Tower might have to close if the local council doesn’t agree to a new ground lease deal

Chartist Tower.(Image: John Myers)

The developer behind the Chartist Tower regeneration project in the centre of Newport, anchored by an award-winning four-star hotel, said its scheme will be rendered commercially unviable unless the local council backs its proposals for a new ground lease agreement that fairly reflects post-Covid trading realities.

In a major vote of confidence in Newport as an investment location, Garrison Barclay Estates, having invested £11m of its own cash reserves, unveiled a 140-bedroom hotel in the building – once occupied by P&O – in 2022.

Advertisement

The scheme also provides around 25,000 sq ft of office space and 15,000 sq ft of retail space, of which 12,000 sq ft is let. This includes a revamped Barclays Bank branch in what was formerly the BHS department store on the ground floor.

While the hotel, which employs more than 40 people and is operated under a management contract by Mercure, has maintained strong occupancy levels since opening, profit margins have been eroded by inflationary pressures.

The scheme’s office element is currently empty after its only occupier, the Newport Argus, relocated, leaving the developer liable for empty business rates.

With Garrison Barclay Estates’ cash injection, bank debt, and £1.6m of grant and loan support from the Welsh Government, provided via Newport Council, the cost of the regeneration project has been around £21m..

Advertisement

The current relief on the long-term ground lease the company has with the council expires in December 2027. As it stands this will see the scheme incurring an annual ground lease payment of £315,000, compared with around £220,000 before Covid.

Cardiff-based Garrison Barclay Estates said that, despite multiple independent reports supporting a reduction in the ground rent, repeated representations to the council have failed to secure a new arrangement.

As an alternative, the company has proposed a revenue-sharing model under which the council’s ground rent would increase as a percentage of revenues as more tenants are secured for the office and retail space and the Ebitda the hotel improves, Under the plans the annual lease payment to the council could reach £220,000.

It said the proposed model would provide the council with full transparency through access to the scheme’s accounts.

Advertisement

Newport Council said the Chartist Tower project has received significant public sector funding. It added that while is was considering the proposals from Garrison Barclay Estates it had to be mindful of the best use of the public purse.

However, without an agreement, with a separate new ground lease deal the hotel, chief executive of Garrison Barclay Estates, Andrew McCarthy, said the hotel could have to close. He confirmed there is already interest from housing associations and added that local authorities across the UK have concluded they need to be more realistic over ground lease rents if they are to sustain and attract commercial investment.

He explained: “If you look back 20 years, councils could expect, for example a large department store, to pay around £1m a year from a ground lease. However, those days are gone.

“The ground rent structure for Chartist Tower was originally established when the building was occupied by a department store and office accommodation, and it no longer reflects the economic reality of operating a modern city-centre hotel.”

Advertisement

To support its case, the company has commissioned independent property and valuation advice, including work undertaken by Carter Jonas, one of the UK’s leading property consultancies with extensive experience in city-centre regeneration and hospitality assets, and BNP Paribas Real Estate.

Additionally, the chief executive said Rockingham Partners has offered specialist assistance to help the council understand how other local authorities have addressed similar issues surrounding high ground rents while promoting the sustainability and long-term viability of their city centres.

The hotel, including visitor spending, generates an economic impact of £10m annually for the city.

Garrison Barclay Estates has also raised its concerns with the new Plaid Cymru Welsh Government, asking it to intervene to help ensure the continuation of one of Newport’s most important city centre businesses.

Advertisement

The company has given the council until July 17 to reconsider its position. If there is no change, it said it would have no alternative but to consider putting the hotel up for sale.

Mr McCarthy said: “If we have to sell this asset, the most likely route for new owners to sustain the existing ground lease would be through securing a contract to accommodate asylum seekers or by converting the property to social housing.

“We believe either outcome could have significant implications for Newport city centre, including its economic vitality, visitor appeal and wider regeneration ambition. “

Mr McCarthy added: “Newport already has substantial levels of social accommodation within the city centre, and the loss of a successful hotel would damage the city’s ability to attract visitors, conferences, business events and private sector investment.

Advertisement

“This is no longer simply about ground rent, but about whether Newport wishes to protect one of its most successful regeneration projects or risk losing a key city-centre asset that has already delivered jobs, investment and economic growth.

“We invested in Newport on the back of council plans to bring further investment into the city, including a proposed knowledge quarter, but this has failed to materialise.

“The number of hotel visitors originally envisaged from delegates attending conferences at ICC Wales has yet to be achieved. While the hotel is award-winning and close to 100% occupancy, our revenue per room would be improved if more events and investment in the city, as promised, were realised.

“However, there is still significant potential for the city and, with a new approach from the council, we want to play our part as an active investor in helping Newport maximise that potential and position itself as a thriving commercial city..”

Advertisement

ICC Wales(Image: Richard Williams/WalesOnline)

When announcing its funding package for the project in 2019, the Welsh Government said: “The refurbishment of Chartist Tower is a pivotal development in the next phase of sustainable investment and regeneration for Newport, and is ideally placed to capitalise on business tourism associated with the opening of the new international convention centre ICC Wales.”

Last year, the hotel received the TripAdvisor Travellers’ Choice Award for the third consecutive year.

A spokesman for the council said: “Newport City Council has provided considerable financial support to the developer in relation to Chartist Tower. It is also owed significant sums of money as, to date, the developer has not paid the interest on the council-provided loan in line with the agreement.

“Over the last two years, the developer has approached us for even more financial support on more than one occasion. The council has consistently refused, despite ‘warnings’ that the hotel would be closed if it did not agree.

Advertisement

“The developer has recently approached us again with yet another proposal, and this is being considered.

“However, taxpayers’ money is precious, and we have a responsibility to ensure that we do not simply hand over public money unless there is a clear business case that provides a clear benefit to the city.

“At all stages, appropriate due diligence is undertaken. All the evidence shows that the hotel is thriving and attracting thousands of guests. New businesses have also opened in Chartist Tower (retail tenants) in the last 12 months.”

Mr McCarthy said the £1.6m of support from the Welsh Government, passed through the council, consisted of a £1m grant. He add that there was an agreement with the council that, at the point of refinancing next year, the remaining £600,000 loan element would be converted back into grant support.

Advertisement

He said the £1.6m was significantly less than the standard level of public sector support of 10% of overall development costs (£21m for Chartist Tower) for projects seeking to regenerate city centres.

In a statement responding to the council’s position, Garrison Barclay Estates said:“The council’s assertion that it provided ‘considerable financial support’ fails to reflect what actually occurred.

“During the development, Newport City Council required the project to proceed with approximately 40% less grant funding than was originally available. Furthermore, after construction had commenced, around £600,000 of grant funding was converted into a loan, fundamentally altering the agreed funding structure and increasing the financial burden on the project.

“It was understood that this loan would ultimately be converted back into grant, as is common practice on regeneration schemes of this nature. That conversion never took place.

Advertisement

“The council also refers to extending the commencement of the ground rent as evidence of its generosity. That is not an accurate characterisation. The extension occurred during the unprecedented disruption caused by the Covid-19 pandemic and the resulting economic downturn.

“It reflected the exceptional circumstances facing the hospitality sector rather than any extraordinary concession by the council. To be clear we have not asked Newport City Council for further public funding.

“Our position has remained consistent throughout: we have requested only that the historic ground rent be reviewed and brought into line with current market conditions so that the hotel can remain sustainable for the long term. This is a commercial lease issue, not a request for taxpayers to provide additional subsidy.

“The hotel itself has been an outstanding success. It has attracted thousands of visitors, created employment, generated significant economic activity and become an important part of Newport’s hospitality sector. It has achieved this despite the much slower pace of the wider city-centre regeneration that was envisaged when we invested in Chartist Tower.

Advertisement

“We committed to this development based on the council’s regeneration vision and the economic assumptions that underpinned it. While the hotel has consistently delivered, many of the wider regeneration ambitions that formed part of that vision have not materialised.”

“The council’s reliance on the hotel’s operational success misses the point entirely. A successful business can still be undermined by an unrealistic lease structure.

“If the council insists on charging a ground rent that exceeds what the property can reasonably sustain in today’s market, it risks damaging a successful business that continues to deliver benefits to Newport.

“The statement also creates an accurate impression of the commercial market within Chartist Tower Although businesses have opened within the building, recent lettings have been completed at rental levels significantly below those originally forecast. In several cases, space has been occupied at little or no rent to support local businesses, maintain activity and contribute to the vitality of the city centre. Those are the realities of the current market and they cannot simply be ignored.

Advertisement

“Moreover the council’s suggestion that there is no clear business case is incorrect. An independent report prepared by Carter Jonas provided a detailed professional assessment of market values, viability and the sustainability of the development. That evidence demonstrated why the existing ground rent requires review. Rather than engaging with those independent findings, the council chose to disregard them.

“This has never been about seeking additional public money. It is about securing a fair, market-based ground rent that reflects today’s commercial realities and protects the long-term future of one of Newport’s most successful regeneration projects.

“We remain willing to engage constructively with Newport City Council to achieve a fair and commercially realistic outcome.”

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

Business

Axelrod to lead BellRing Brands

Published

on

Axelrod to lead BellRing Brands

Most recently was CEO of Snak King.

Continue Reading

Business

Earnings call transcript: MTY Food Group misses Q2 2026 estimates

Published

on


Earnings call transcript: MTY Food Group misses Q2 2026 estimates

Continue Reading

Business

Xavier Niel becomes Vodafone’s largest shareholder

Published

on

Xavier Niel becomes Vodafone's largest shareholder

French telecoms billionaire Xavier Niel is to become the largest shareholder in Vodafone, the group behind the UK’s biggest mobile network, after agreeing a £4.4 billion deal to buy out Emirati giant e&’s entire stake.

Niel, the largest private investor in Europe’s telecoms sector, will acquire the 16.2 per cent shareholding, which carries 17.13 per cent of Vodafone’s voting rights, through Vega, a newly created acquisition vehicle. e&, formerly known as Etisalat, will receive £1.11 per share, with ownership expected to transfer by the end of the year.

For the millions of UK businesses that rely on Vodafone for mobile and broadband connectivity, the arrival of a new anchor investor is more than a City curiosity. Niel’s family group runs telecoms businesses across 26 countries in Europe and Latin America, with 139 million subscribers, 45,000 employees and €24 billion in annual revenues. Its assets include iliad, Salt, Monaco Telecom, Eir, Tele2 and Millicom.

He is also one of Europe’s most active technology backers, having ploughed approximately €4 billion into European AI projects since 2022, alongside a longer record of supporting education and entrepreneurship platforms including School 42, Station F, Hectar and Kima Ventures.

Vega has stressed the investment is intended as a long-term, strategic minority shareholding rather than a prelude to a takeover.

Advertisement

The deal lands at a pivotal moment for Vodafone’s UK operations. In May the group agreed a £4.3 billion deal to take full ownership of VodafoneThree, buying out the 49 per cent stake held by CK Hutchison, parent company of Three. The joint venture has already made an £11 billion pledge to bring standalone 5G to virtually every corner of the UK by 2034, a rollout with clear stakes for small firms in poorly connected areas.

Vodafone’s FY26 results showed revenue up 8 per cent to €40.5 billion, with profit before tax of almost £1.9 billion, a sharp turnaround from a £1.5 billion loss the previous year as the group simplifies its business. Investor sentiment was nonetheless dampened by a pause in share buybacks to fund the VodafoneThree buyout, disappointing results in Germany, its largest market, and a miss on its overall adjusted earnings forecast.

The deal also comes amid a wider push for scale in European telecoms. Vodafone chief executive Margherita Della Valle has warned that Europe’s 5G rollout lags behind the US and Asia, blaming fragmented markets and regulation that deters investment.

“Vodafone is a compelling investment opportunity, underpinned by quality assets, strong brands, leadership positions and a diversified geographic footprint,” said Niel. “As a simpler, more focused business, Vodafone is ready for a new phase of growth and is well-placed to unlock substantial untapped value across its European and African operations.

Advertisement

“We are confident Vodafone can deliver sustainable growth and strong cash flow generation over the long term and – as an anchor investor based in Europe – we are ready to contribute our deep sector expertise and operational know-how to its future success.

“As demonstrated by our past investments – including as minority investors in listed companies like Tele2 and Millicom – we have a proven track record of helping businesses to perform better and create substantial shareholder value.”

The change at the top of the shareholder register comes as Vodafone’s relationship with small business partners remains under scrutiny at home, where the company is defending an £85 million High Court claim brought by former franchisees.


Paul Jones

Harvard alumni and former New York Times journalist. Editor of Business Matters for over 15 years, the UKs largest business magazine. I am also head of Capital Business Media’s automotive division working for clients such as Red Bull Racing, Honda, Aston Martin and Infiniti.

Advertisement

Continue Reading

Business

Mark My Words July 10 2026

Published

on

Mark My Words July 10 2026

Mark Pownall is joined by Gary Adshead, Sam Jones and Claire Tyrrell to talk about the big events of the week in WA business and politics, including a cabinet reshuffle, Secret Harbour’s byelection, university mergers, Pilbara IR, Telstra‘s outage, cyber attacks, WA building stats, Cultural Centre blowout, Vic Park, Vasse and Yallingup. 

Continue Reading

Business

PepsiCo’s strategic moves ‘resonating with consumers’

Published

on

PepsiCo’s strategic moves ‘resonating with consumers’

CEO says first-half global organic volume grows at highest rate in four years.

Continue Reading

Business

a UK private market first

Published

on

British Business Bank backs $8.6bn Wayve funding round in UK robotaxi push

Employees at Wayve, the British autonomous driving firm, began selling $85 million of their shares today in the first employee share sale ever conducted on the London Stock Exchange’s Private Securities Market, a moment with real consequences for every UK founder who has ever promised staff their options would one day be worth something.

Crowdcube managed the sell-side of the transaction, which is not only a first for the PSM but also the largest deal completed under the FCA’s PISCES regulation, the Private Intermittent Securities and Capital Exchange System, since the framework went live.

The PSM is designed to provide liquidity in some of the world’s leading later-stage private companies, while helping current employees with vested equity to unlock some of the value they have helped to create. In plain terms, staff at private firms can now sell a slice of their holdings through a regulated exchange without waiting for a float or a trade sale.

That matters well beyond Cambridge and the robotaxi race. Share options have long been the growing firm’s answer to corporate salaries it cannot match, but the promise has always carried an asterisk: the money is theoretical until an exit arrives, and exits have been thin on the ground. A functioning secondary market changes the conversation an SME founder can have with a prospective hire.

Dame Julia Hoggett, CEO of London Stock Exchange plc, said: “We are delighted to see the PISCES framework and our Private Securities Market being utilised by innovative companies, such as Wayve, seeking liquidity events for their stakeholders, including employees.”

Advertisement

Wayve is arguably the ideal poster child. The company closed a $1.5 billion funding round valuing it at $8.6 billion earlier this year, the highest valuation yet achieved by a UK AI start-up, and in May signed a formal partnership with the government to accelerate self-driving deployment on British roads. Its staff have built substantial paper wealth. Today, some of it becomes actual wealth, in London rather than New York.

Matt Cooper, Crowdcube co-CEO, said: “This is what we hope will be the first of many of these transactions with other partners for Crowdcube – using our leading infrastructure to manage a complex employee liquidity transaction on the London Stock Exchange’s Private Securities Market – as we’ve done for Wayve in this instance.

“As Europe’s leading private market liquidity platform, Crowdcube’s is seeing a massive increase in the number of companies looking to complete secondary share sales in the next 6-12 months.

“These are transactions for a wide variety of companies, providing liquidity for employees and early stage investors that Crowdcube can support, including through the Private Securities Market.”

Advertisement

That pipeline comment deserves attention. With UK start-ups enjoying a record fundraising first half but staying private for longer, pressure for liquidity from employees and early backers has been building for years. If Cooper is right, Wayve’s tender is the start of a queue, and businesses far smaller than an $8.6 billion AI champion will be watching how the mechanics perform.

The $85 million employee tender was supported by Registered Auction Agents Stifel, acting as sole and exclusive private placement agent, alongside advisors Latham & Watkins and Deloitte.

For UK capital markets, bruised by years of headlines about departing listings, this is a rarer story: new infrastructure, built in London, being used at scale on day one. For business owners, the lesson is simpler still. Equity you give your team may soon be worth something before you sell up, and that changes how you hire.


Jamie Young

Jamie Young

Jamie is Senior Reporter at Business Matters, bringing over a decade of experience in UK SME business reporting.
Jamie holds a degree in Business Administration and regularly participates in industry conferences and workshops.

When not reporting on the latest business developments, Jamie is passionate about mentoring up-and-coming journalists and entrepreneurs to inspire the next generation of business leaders.

Advertisement

Continue Reading

Business

City explores options to redevelop Fremantle Oval

Published

on

City explores options to redevelop Fremantle Oval

A redevelopment of Fremantle Oval could cost up to $205 million, as the council explores options after failed attempts to revamp the sports ground.

Continue Reading

Business

Infleqtion, Inc. 2026 Q1 – Results – Earnings Call Presentation (NYSE:INFQ) 2026-07-10

Published

on

OneWater Marine Inc. (ONEW) Q1 2026 Earnings Call Transcript

This article was written by

Seeking Alpha’s transcripts team is responsible for the development of all of our transcript-related projects. We currently publish thousands of quarterly earnings calls per quarter on our site and are continuing to grow and expand our coverage. The purpose of this profile is to allow us to share with our readers new transcript-related developments. Thanks, SA Transcripts Team

Continue Reading

Business

Christopher Wood warns of AI fatigue. Why Jefferies is turning to India and China

Published

on

Christopher Wood warns of AI fatigue. Why Jefferies is turning to India and China
Emerging markets bull Christopher Wood says the spectacular AI trade is showing clear signs of “fatigue”, and Jefferies is responding by tilting exposure toward cheaper, under‑owned markets such as India and China that stand to benefit from mean reversion away from crowded AI winners. He believes the “picks and shovels” of the AI capex boom will keep outperforming even as investors rotate out of hyperscalers and into value names across Asia.

In his newsletter ‘GREED & fear’, Wood writes that the new quarter has opened “with much talk of ‘AI fatigue’ as investors look out for a peaking out of momentum and rotation into cheaper ‘value’ names which have not been part of the AI trade,” citing Tencent as one Asian example. He argues that sharp pullbacks in Korea’s AI leaders are “both natural and healthy” after “hyperbolic moves,” with the Kospi now down 22% from its 19 June peak and single‑stock leveraged ETFs on SK Hynix and Samsung Electronics dropping around 30% from asset highs.

Wood highlights just how extreme the AI run‑up has been: since the start of 2023, a market‑cap‑weighted basket of Micron, SK Hynix and Samsung Electronics has surged about 760%, versus a 180% gain for a basket of Alphabet, Amazon, Meta and Microsoft. “Long‑term GREED & fear would still rather own the DRAM makers,” he says, adding that “the demand for compute can keep growing even as the cost of tokens collapse,” while he has “no idea which of the hyperscalers, if any, are going to be successfully monetising their AI capex.”

Also Read | Korea’s pain will be India’s gain? Why Nifty bears betting on Kospi crash may get disappointed

Advertisement

Trillion‑Dollar AI Capex, Thin Monetisation


Jefferies underscores the macro scale of the AI build‑out, estimating that the four major US hyperscalers will spend about US$700bn on capex this year and more than US$800bn next year, rising to over US$1tn in 2027 when Oracle, Anthropic, OpenAI and neo‑cloud players are included. This US$1tn figure equates to roughly 3% of US GDP, around 22% of US non‑residential fixed investment and an estimated 33% of total pre‑tax profits of all US non‑financial companies, underlining Wood’s description of AI as “the mother of all cycles.”
Yet, he warns that the financing and accounting of this capex arms race are increasingly stretched. The four hyperscalers have lifted projected capex to a massive 92% of projected operating cash flow, collectively issued US$169bn of bonds so far this year and accumulated US$662bn of future data‑centre lease commitments that remain off balance sheet, with total undiscounted lease obligations nearing US$969bn.
Why Jefferies Is Rotating Toward India

Against that backdrop, Jefferies is deliberately tilting its Asia Pacific ex‑Japan asset‑allocation toward markets less dominated by AI momentum. In its latest GREED & fear note, the firm assigns India a 12% recommended weight versus a 10.9% benchmark weight in the MSCI AC Asia Pacific ex‑Japan index, giving India a positive mismatch of 1.1 percentage points.

Despite a correction in memory stocks, GREED & fear remains Underweight Taiwan and only Neutral on Korea, having cut Korea’s neutral weighting from 24.6% to 20.8% since late June, while maintaining exposure to smaller ASEAN markets largely “just to maintain a presence there.” Wood’s message is that markets like India, which host “cheaper ‘value’ names which have not been part of the AI trade,” are well positioned to benefit from any sustained rotation out of momentum AI names.

China: Valuation Play in the Rotation

Advertisement

China is the other key leg of Jefferies’ rotation. Wood states that “it is too late to sell MSCI China or indeed Hong Kong,” arguing that this is “precisely the area that should benefit from any mean reversion out of momentum AI names,” a view he credits to Jefferies’ global head of quantitative strategy, Desh Peramunetilleke.

MSCI China has de‑rated sharply to just 10.6 times 12‑month forward earnings, down from 13.9 times in October 2025 and 18.5 times in early 2021, even as the CSI 300 is up 11.9% in the first half of 2026 while MSCI China is down 14.9% in US dollar terms. Wood concedes that falling household loans and rising retail non‑performing loans are “one area of concern,” but maintains a base case that consumption is stabilising at a lower share of GDP and that China will avoid a self‑feeding negative equity cycle in residential property, leaving consumer and domestic‑demand stocks already pricing in much of the macro strain.

Bigger Than Dot‑Com – And Now Rotating

To frame the AI cycle historically, Jefferies notes that US investment in information‑processing equipment and software has climbed to 4.88% of nominal GDP in 1Q26, surpassing the 4.46% peak reached at the height of the dot‑com boom in 4Q00. Wood stresses that the earnings from this capex boom are “front‑end loaded” in favour of picks‑and‑shovels suppliers, while hyperscalers spent US$130bn on capex in 1Q26 but booked only US$41. 6bn of depreciation and amortisation, making profits look technically overstated.

Advertisement

With the Hyperscalers‑4 index underperforming the S&P 500 by 11% since early May and AI leaders well off their highs, Wood argues that investors can no longer ignore the risks around monetisation, financing and political pushback to data‑centre projects. “So long as the AI capex arms race continues, the beneficiaries will remain the picks and shovels trade (i.e. the people being paid for the capex, not the companies spending the money),” he concludes, as Jefferies repositions toward India, China and other Asian markets poised to gain from a long‑overdue rotation out of AI momentum.

(Disclaimer: Recommendations, suggestions, views and opinions given by the experts are their own. These do not represent the views of The Economic Times)

Continue Reading

Business

EU threatens Meta with fines over ‘addictive’ Facebook and Instagram

Published

on

A stock image shows a young woman lying down with a glum expression as she scrolls on her smartphone

Meta must change Facebook’s and Instagram’s “addictive” design or face a heavy fine, the EU has warned.

In its preliminary findings, the European Commission said features such as infinite scroll, autoplaying videos and personalised recommendations could encourage “compulsive use”, particularly among children and teens.

If Meta does not make suitable changes, it could be fined up to 6% of its total global annual turnover.

A spokesperson for the tech giant told the BBC it disagreed with the findings “which don’t accurately take into account the significant steps we’ve taken to protect teens”.

Advertisement

In the preliminary findings, the Commission said the endless stream of content “shift the brain into autopilot mode, contributing to unhealthy habits”.

In particular, it is particularly concerned about the impact social media platforms may have on younger users.

“Protecting the physical and mental health of Europeans must be a priority for social media platforms,” EU tech chief Henna Virkkunen said in a statement.

The Commission said Meta failed to adequately assess the risks posed by how Facebook and Instagram were designed, as well as how long children spend on the platforms, particularly at night.

Advertisement

It raised concerns about features such as Reels and Stories, arguing they could contribute to excessive use, and claimed Meta’s safeguards do not go far enough.

The Commission said time-management tools on Facebook and Instagram, including those enabled by default for teenagers, can be dismissed and do not meaningfully reduce usage.

And it also criticised Meta’s parental controls, arguing they are only effective if parents have the time and technical expertise to understand and use them properly.

But Meta said it had rolled out Teen Accounts that “automatically protect teens and put parents in control – allowing them to block access to Instagram at night and cap daily screen time at just 15 minutes”.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2025