Connect with us

Business

How family offices are investing in the final frontier beyond SpaceX

Published

on

How family offices are investing in the final frontier beyond SpaceX

As seen from Canaveral National Seashore, a SpaceX Falcon 9 rocket carrying 60 Starlink satellites launches from pad 39A at the Kennedy Space Center on October 6, 2020 in Cape Canaveral, Florida. This is the 13th batch of satellites placed into orbit by SpaceX as part of a constellation designed to provide broadband internet service around the globe. (Photo by Paul Hennessy/NurPhoto via Getty Images)

Nurphoto | Nurphoto | Getty Images

A version of this article first appeared in CNBC’s Inside Wealth newsletter with Robert Frank, a weekly guide to the high-net-worth investor and consumer. Sign up to receive future editions, straight to your inbox.

Advertisement

The investment firms of billionaires including ex-eBay President Jeff Skoll and AutoZone’s Pitt Hyde are set to reap rewards from SpaceX’s IPO this Friday.

However, while SpaceX’s profile eclipses that of nearly every other private space company, family office investors told CNBC that they see other opportunities in the sector even for companies without Elon Musk‘s name attached. Moreover, they said they view space-related startups as opportunities to invest in infrastructure and defense rather than flashy bets on space exploration.

Gary Lauder, a cosmetics heir turned venture capitalist, has invested in SpaceX through a special purpose vehicle and two venture funds. He told CNBC he was attracted to the strength of its Starlink satellite technology, not the prospect of space tourism.

Much of Lauder’s early investing was in telecommunications, and he took a seminar in satellite communications in the early ’90s.

Advertisement

“I never dreamed of being an astronaut,” he said. “It’s just an important mode of communication.”

Jason Blanck, an investor who started his namesake family office in 2024, said he is interested in the picks and shovels of space, like mission-critical hardware and data networks.

“I think the public markets are focused heavily on debating rocket launch cadences, costs around flight development, but from my perspective and where I sit, managing permanent family capital, the real narrative has actually quite evolved,” he said.

Robin Lauber’s Infinitas Capital invested in SpaceX in early 2025 through a secondary offering. He cited Musk’s track record and the success of Starlink as reasons to put money in. Lauber also noted the valuation was “reasonable” compared with the more than $1.75 trillion expected now.

Advertisement

He told CNBC that Infinitas would have sold some shares before the initial public offering had it found a willing buyer at the right discounted valuation. Lauber is open to selling locked-up shares at a discount to recover the initial cost of investment and seeing how the other shares fare.

Looking forward, Lauber is weighing more investments in European space companies such as Isar Aerospace, a German launch service provider. He is also considering participating in a new fund by Alpine Space Ventures, which counts a SpaceX alum as a founding partner.

“European sovereignty is a huge topic everywhere,” he said.

Get Inside Wealth directly to your inbox

Investing in space-related firms was unpopular not so long ago, according to Jon Kutler of Admiralty Partners. He spent 10 years in the U.S. Navy before becoming an investment banker specializing in aerospace and defense in the early 1980s. He left Wasserstein Perella & Co. in 1992 to start his own investment firm in order to focus more on the sector to the chagrin of his then-boss, Bruce Wasserstein.

Advertisement

“”He told me I was an idiot because the Cold War was over and there was going to be no more spending in the defense industry,” Kutler said. “People had extrapolated that to be the end of the defense industry, but if you look over the history of mankind, we’re just not a very peaceful species. To me, it seemed ludicrous to declare an end to defense spending, and I was willing to bet against that with my own capital and my own time.”

Kutler sold that investment firm in 2002 to focus on his family office, Admiralty Partners. His investments include Firefly Aerospace, a rocket maker with clients including Lockheed Martin and the U.S. Space Force.

Investing in aerospace firms pioneering new technologies requires patience, Kutler said. This is where family offices have an edge on traditional private equity firms since they aren’t under pressure to realize returns on a fixed timeline.

While the prospect of traveling to Mars is exciting, space exploration companies face a harder path to financial success because federal government spending is less consistent, he said.

Advertisement

“Defense spending is going to be a recurring theme, It will have ups and downs based upon administration priorities, but there’s always going to be an end market there,” he said.

Kutler said the enthusiasm around the SpaceX IPO belies considerable risks to investing in aerospace, such as swings in federal spending. He added that he is concerned federal cuts to research funding will endanger the pipeline of future startups.

“There is a temptation because of what’s going on right now to think that commercial space companies are the answer to everything,” Kutler said. “Perhaps over time the commercial industry may able to do it cheaper, but if you amortize everything out, it takes a long time for that to happen, and these early investments by the government were key to making these things happen.”

Choose CNBC as your preferred source on Google and never miss a moment from the most trusted name in business news.
Advertisement
Continue Reading
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

Business

Tesla weighs sale of China business to pave way for potential SpaceX merger, WSJ reports

Published

on


Tesla weighs sale of China business to pave way for potential SpaceX merger, WSJ reports

Continue Reading

Business

From Batch Risk to Brand Strength With the Right Oil Packaging

Published

on

From Batch Risk to Brand Strength With the Right Oil Packaging

Anyone selling natural oils knows that quality is not just about the formula. Essential oils, serums, and botanical blends are sensitive to light and oxygen.

Once an oil starts to oxidise, the difference may show up in its smell, colour or general character. Customers notice those things. A product that seems different from the last bottle can quickly turn into a question, a complaint or a return. For a smaller brand, even a modest number of cases like this can become expensive, particularly when trust and repeat orders are still being built.

This matters even more as natural beauty and wellness products become a bigger part of the market. Many buyers now look closely at ingredient lists and prefer products with fewer preservatives. They also pay attention to what the product comes in, including whether the packaging feels responsible and appropriate for natural oils.That puts pressure on producers to safeguard shelf life without making the formula heavier. This is exactly where packaging becomes a strategic choice.

Why Light and Oxygen Eat Into Your Margin

Many brands default to amber glass or plastic. That is understandable, it is widely available and relatively affordable. But for light sensitive oils, the total cost can end up higher than the purchase price of the bottle itself. Think of:

  • More rejected batches due to instability
    • Shorter shelf life and therefore faster stock turnover
    • Extra customer service due to scent or color deviations
    • Risk of negative reviews

Photodegradation can play a role especially in products with unsaturated fatty acids, natural antioxidants, or volatile aroma components. Packaging that reduces light exposure therefore supports not only product quality, but also predictability across the supply chain and retail.

Biophotonic Violet Glass as an Option for Light Sensitive Formulas

Biophotonic violet glass is designed to protect contents from a large part of the visible light spectrum that can accelerate degradation, while still allowing certain wavelengths through. The premise is simple: less light stress means a better chance of preserving scent, color, and efficacy.

Advertisement

Aromatherapy and wellness oils are often sold in small dropper bottles, which makes sense for products that are used a few drops at a time.In that segment, essential oil bottles in violet glass are relevant when you want to combine premium positioning with protection against light exposure.

In skincare and personal care, ease of use matters alongside protection, think pipettes, pumps, and consistent dosing. For brands seeking a uniform, luxury look, cosmetic bottles in violet glass are a logical option, especially when bringing multiple SKUs into the same design line.

The Closure Matters as Much as the Bottle

The bottle receives most of the attention, but the closure can be just as important for product stability. A high-quality glass container will not compensate for a poorly fitted dropper, loose cap, or pump that allows too much air into the package.

This is particularly relevant for oils with volatile aromatic compounds. Every time the bottle is opened, the formula is exposed to fresh air. The amount of exposure depends on the opening size, the dosing system, how often the product is used, and how well the closure seals between applications.

Advertisement

For that reason, packaging development should consider the bottle and closure as one system. A dropper that works well with a facial serum may not be ideal for a thinner essential oil. Pumps may offer cleaner dosing for some cosmetic products, while reducer inserts can make more sense for concentrated oils.

It is worth checking the smaller parts of the closure too, not just the bottle itself. Strong botanical oils can sometimes react with rubber, plastic, liners or seals in ways that are not obvious at first. Testing the full bottle and closure together before launch can reveal problems such as swelling, softening, leaks or changes in the product.

Headspace Can Influence Product Stability

Even the air left inside the bottle deserves some attention. When there is a lot of empty space above the oil, there is also more oxygen in the container, and that can slowly affect formulas that are sensitive to air.

This is worth thinking about when the bottle is much larger than the amount inside it. A 30 ml oil in an oversized container may look impressive on the shelf, but the extra air inside can work against the effort to keep the product stable.

Advertisement

A better fit between the fill amount and the bottle size can make sense for both protection and presentation. It also avoids using more packaging than the product really needs.

For formulas that react quickly to oxygen, the filling stage may need closer attention as well. Some producers reduce air contact during filling, while others use inert gas where the formula and production setup justify it.These decisions depend on the formula and manufacturing setup, but they show why packaging performance cannot be separated completely from the filling process.

Packaging Choices Affect Inventory Planning

Shelf stability is not only a laboratory concern. The type of packaging a brand uses can also shape its stock planning, including how much product it keeps on hand and when the next production run needs to happen.

For a smaller business, this can be a difficult balance. Minimum order quantities, batch sizes and storage costs all have to be planned around demand that may change from month to month. When an oil has a limited stability window, older stock can become a concern sooner than expected, sometimes leading to smaller production runs or early discounts just to keep inventory moving.

Advertisement

Packaging that gives the formula better protection can make that planning a little less restrictive.

Stock can potentially remain commercially viable for longer, retailers may face fewer quality concerns, and the business has more room to manage slower-moving SKUs.

This does not mean every product automatically needs the highest specification bottle available. It means packaging should be evaluated against the cost of instability. A slightly higher packaging cost can be easier to justify when it helps reduce write-offs, replacements, or emergency production runs.

Storage and Distribution Should Be Part of the Test

A formula may perform perfectly in controlled storage and still experience problems during real-world distribution.

Advertisement

Products can spend days in delivery vans, warehouses, fulfillmentcenters, retail stockrooms, or customer mailboxes. Conditions during delivery are rarely consistent. A package may sit in a warm van, move through a cool warehouse, get shaken during transport, or spend time in direct light before it reaches the customer.

That makes transport testing just as useful as checking shelf stability. The aim is to see what happens to the complete pack under movement and temperature changes. Closures can loosen, droppers can seep, labels can lift, and the formula itself may respond differently after repeated heat exposure.

For online sellers, even a small leak can become a much bigger problem.One failed bottle can ruin the outer packaging, stain other products in the shipment, and create an immediate negative first impression.

Testing packaging under conditions that resemble the actual supply chain gives a more useful picture than testing the formula in isolation.

Advertisement

Premium Packaging Also Shapes Customer Perception

Packaging protection has a technical role, but it also affects how customers interpret the product.

Natural oils often compete in crowded categories where formulas can appear similar at first glance. Bottle weight, glass color, closure quality, label finish, and dispensing experience all influence perceived value before the customer has fully evaluated the product itself.

Violet glass can create a distinctive visual identity compared with conventional clear or amber packaging. For premium wellness, aromatherapy, and skincare brands, that differentiation can support higher-value positioning when it fits the broader brand story.

The important point is consistency. A premium bottle paired with a low-quality dropper, weak label, or poor outer carton creates mixed signals. Everything should work together, from the bottle and cap to the label, dispensing method and how the product feels in the customer’s hand.

Advertisement

Sustainability Needs More Than a Material Claim

There is more to sustainable packaging than deciding between glass and plastic. The amount of material, shipping distance and what happens to the pack once it is empty all count.

Glass has the advantage of being recyclable and suitable for reuse, but its weight can make transport more demanding. A lighter pack may be easier to ship, although it will not always give a sensitive oil the same protection.Refillable systems can reduce packaging use, but only when customers actually reuse them.

Brands therefore need to consider the complete packaging system rather than relying on one environmental claim.

Useful questions include whether the glass can enter established recycling streams, whether components can be separated easily, whether unnecessary secondary packaging can be removed, and whether the container is durable enough for reuse.

Advertisement

There is also a product-waste angle. If stronger protection helps prevent oils from degrading before they are used, that can reduce wasted formula, ingredients, labor, and production energy. Sustainability is therefore connected not only to the container itself, but also to how successfully the packaging preserves the product inside it.

Build Packaging Around Future Growth

A packaging solution that works for the first 500 units may become difficult when monthly production reaches 10,000 units.

Growing brands should consider supply continuity early. That means looking beyond the bottle itself. Brands also need to know whether the supplier can keep the same packaging available, how long orders take to arrive, what quantities must be purchased, and whether matching closures and finishes will still be available as demand grows.

Using some of the same components across several products can make purchasing easier. Different oils, for example, might use the same neck size and closure even when the bottle size or label changes.That reduces the number of separate packaging components the business needs to manage.

Advertisement

It also helps maintain a recognizable visual identity as the product range expands.

Packaging decisions are therefore partly about today’s formula and partly about tomorrow’s assortment. A scalable system can reduce redesign work, supplier changes, and packaging inconsistencies later.

How to Make Claims Measurable Without Marketing Risk

A common pitfall in packaging communication is making absolute claims such as doubles shelf life or 100% protection. In practice, performance depends on the formula, headspace, closure, storage, and logistics. What you can do is test and back up your claims with data.

A small team can keep the testing fairly straightforward:

Advertisement
  1. Start with each formula on its own. Look at how easily it reacts to light, air and changes in storage conditions.
  2. Test the current bottle and the new option side by side, keeping the closure and test conditions the same for both.
  3. Measure not only shelf life, but also sensory attributes (scent and color) and key actives.

A compact stability setup can already reveal where the real gains lie: fewer complaints, less waste, and a more consistent product on the shelf.

Three Checks for Your Next Packaging Decision

  • Does the closure fit the product, and has leakage been tested during transport?
    • Is the packaging scalable in terms of volumes and availability as you grow?
    • Does the material support your brand story around sustainability and premium quality?

These three questions are a useful starting point, but the strongest packaging decisions usually come from looking at the complete journey of the product. That includes filling, storage, transport, retail exposure, customer use, and eventual disposal or reuse.

Unit price still matters, especially for smaller brands working with tight margins. But it should not be considered in isolation. Packaging that reduces product degradation, limits leakage, supports smoother inventory planning, and creates a stronger customer experience can deliver value long after the bottle has been purchased.

For natural oil, wellness, and cosmetic brands, the right packaging is therefore more than a container around the formula. It is part of quality control, logistics, positioning, sustainability, and growth. Choosing it with the same care given to the ingredients can turn a potential source of batch risk into a practical source of brand strength.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Business

Endeavour Mining plc (EDV:CA) Q2 2026 Earnings Call Transcript

Published

on

OneWater Marine Inc. (ONEW) Q1 2026 Earnings Call Transcript