For most small businesses, inventory is the second-largest use of cash after payroll and rent. Yet it rarely gets managed with the same discipline. Payroll runs on a schedule. Rent is a fixed line item. Inventory, by contrast, is often tracked in a spreadsheet that someone updates when they remember to, or not tracked in any structured way at all until a bestseller runs out mid-season or a storage unit fills up with stock that stopped moving a year ago.
That gap matters more for a small business than a large one. A national retailer that misjudges demand on one product line barely notices. A small business that ties up a third of its working capital in the wrong stock can spend months recovering.
This guide covers what inventory management actually involves, the core methods worth knowing, how to build a working system from scratch, and where a spreadsheet stops being enough.
What Inventory Management Means for a Small Business
Inventory management is the process of tracking, ordering, and controlling the stock a business buys and sells, so it has the right amount of product on hand without tying up more cash than necessary.
Advertisement
At a large company, that process is usually a dedicated function with its own software and staff. At a small business, it’s typically one person, often the owner, doing it alongside sales, hiring, and everything else.
That difference shapes the whole approach. A small business can’t absorb the cost of overstock the way a larger one can, and it usually can’t negotiate the supplier terms that make just-in-time ordering low-risk. The goal isn’t to copy enterprise inventory practices at a smaller scale. It’s to run a version built for thin margins, limited storage, and one or two people managing it.
Why Small Businesses Struggle With It
The challenges are fairly consistent across industries, even though the products differ.
Knowing how much to buy. Order too much and cash sits on a shelf instead of in the business. Order too little and a customer walks out empty-handed or worse, buys from a competitor and doesn’t come back.
Advertisement
Limited space. Most small businesses don’t have a warehouse to absorb excess stock. A storage closet or a corner of the shop floor has to do double duty, which makes overbuying a physical problem as much as a financial one.
Manual tracking errors. Spreadsheets and handwritten logs drift from reality fast. A miscount here, a forgotten update there, and the numbers on paper stop matching what’s actually on the shelf.
Supplier leverage. Small businesses generally don’t have the order volume to negotiate the pricing or flexible terms that larger buyers get, which makes lead times and minimum order quantities harder constraints to work around.
Seasonal and demand swings. A slow month can look like healthy inventory levels right up until a rush hits and reveals how thin the buffer actually was.
Advertisement
None of these are solved by one trick. They’re solved by picking a method that fits the business and applying it consistently, which is the next section.
Core Inventory Management Methods
A handful of methods cover most of what a small business needs. Few businesses use just one; most combine two or three.
ABC Analysis
ABC analysis sorts inventory into three tiers based on value and sales impact, not just volume:
A items : a small share of SKUs that drive the largest share of revenue or cost. These get the closest attention: frequent counts, tighter reorder rules, stronger supplier relationships.
B items : moderate value, moderate attention. Monthly reviews are usually enough.
C items : the bulk of the catalog by count, but a small share of value. Quarterly review is often sufficient, and some businesses move slow C items to special-order only.
The practical benefit is focus. A business with 500 SKUs doesn’t need to watch all 500 with equal intensity, it needs to watch the 50 or so that actually move the needle.
A quick example: a boutique candle shop carries 120 SKUs. Ranking them by annual revenue shows that 18 scented candles account for roughly 70% of sales – those become A items, checked weekly. The next 30 or so items (seasonal scents, gift sets) make up another 20% of revenue and become B items, reviewed monthly. The remaining 70-plus SKUs – one-off colors, discontinued scents still on the shelf – generate the last 10% and become C items, counted quarterly and candidates for clearance if they don’t move.
Advertisement
FIFO (First In, First Out)
FIFO means the oldest stock sells first. It’s standard for anything perishable or trend-sensitive – food, cosmetics, seasonal apparel – where holding onto older inventory too long turns it into a write-off. Rotating stock physically (older items to the front) makes FIFO easy to enforce without extra software.
Reorder Point (ROP)
The reorder point is the stock level that triggers a new order, calculated as expected demand during the supplier’s lead time, plus a buffer for uncertainty (safety stock):
Reorder point = (average daily sales × lead time in days) + safety stock
Example: a product sells 8 units a day, and the supplier takes 6 days to deliver. Lead-time demand is 48 units. Add a safety stock buffer of 15 units for demand variability, and the reorder point is 63 units – the moment stock hits that number, it’s time to order, not the moment the shelf looks low.
Advertisement
Economic Order Quantity (EOQ)
EOQ estimates the order size that minimizes total cost by balancing ordering costs (placing and receiving an order) against carrying costs (storing it). It’s most useful for A-tier items with steady, predictable demand for volatile or seasonal products, it tends to oversimplify.
Just-in-Time (JIT)
JIT means ordering stock to arrive right when it’s needed, minimizing how much cash sits in storage. It works well when suppliers are fast and reliable. For a small business with a single supplier and a multi-week lead time, it’s a riskier fit – a single delayed shipment can mean empty shelves with no buffer to absorb it.
Building an Inventory System, Step by Step
Most small businesses don’t need a sophisticated system on day one. They need a consistent one.
1. Pick one tracking method and commit to it. Spreadsheet, dedicated software, or a hybrid, the specific tool matters less than using it consistently. Switching methods every few months is what causes the drift that leads to phantom inventory: stock that exists on paper but not on the shelf, or vice versa.
Advertisement
2. Set par levels and reorder points for your top sellers first. Trying to calculate reorder points for an entire catalog on day one is a good way to never finish. Start with the 15–20 SKUs that drive most of the revenue, using the ABC framework above, and expand from there.
3. Build in cycle counting. Instead of one exhausting annual count, count a rotating slice of inventory on a regular schedule – A items weekly or biweekly, B items monthly, C items quarterly. Discrepancies get caught while they’re small, not after they’ve compounded for a year.
4. Connect inventory to your books. If sales, stock counts, and accounting live in three disconnected places, someone is doing manual reconciliation and manual reconciliation is where errors hide the longest. Setting up a solid framework for small business bookkeeping ensures your inventory costs accurately flow into your financial statements.
Spreadsheet or Software? Knowing When to Switch
A spreadsheet is a perfectly reasonable inventory system for a business with a small catalog and one sales channel. The signs it’s time to move on are fairly clear:
Advertisement
Stock counts are wrong often enough that staff double-check before promising a customer availability
The business sells across more than one channel (in-store, online, marketplace) and keeping them in sync manually eats real time each week
Inventory tracking is taking hours a week that could go toward the business itself
The business has outgrown a single location
When those signs show up, a handful of tools cover most small business needs:
Small manufacturers and makers tracking raw materials and production
Paid plans only, no free tier
*Confirm current pricing directly with each vendor, plans and rates change frequently.
None of these is universally “best” – the right one depends on sales channels, whether the business manufactures anything, and what it already uses for point-of-sale or accounting. It’s worth testing free tiers or trials against actual order volume before committing to a paid plan. If the business is also choosing accounting software around the same time, best small business accounting software is worth reading alongside this, since the two decisions often affect each other.
Inventory KPIs Worth Tracking
A few numbers reveal whether an inventory system is actually working, beyond a gut sense of “we seem to be running low on things.”
Inventory Turnover Ratio
How many times inventory is sold and replaced over a period, calculated as COGS [cost of goods sold – the direct cost of the products a business sells, defined in detail in the IRS’s Tax Guide for Small Business] ÷ average inventory value. A low ratio suggests overstocking or slow-moving products; a very high one can mean the business is understocked and risking stockouts.
Advertisement
Carrying Cost
The cost of holding inventory, including storage, insurance, and capital tied up. It typically runs 20–30% of inventory value per year. When working with tight cash margins, cutting unnecessary overhead – whether by avoiding overstocking or using free payroll software for your team, helps keep operating capital free for inventory replenishment.
Stockout Rate
The share of demand that couldn’t be met because an item was out of stock. This one is easy to underestimate, since a stockout often shows up as a customer who simply leaves rather than a complaint that gets logged.
Sell-Through Rate
The percentage of received stock that actually sells within a given period. A consistently low sell-through rate on a product is usually the clearest early signal that it needs to be discounted, bundled, or dropped.
Mistakes That Quietly Cost Small Businesses Money
Buying in bulk without running the carrying-cost math. A supplier discount for ordering 500 units instead of 100 looks like savings on the invoice. If 300 of those units sit unsold for six months, the storage and capital cost can erase the discount entirely.
Advertisement
Counting inventory once a year and trusting the number the rest of the time. A lot can drift in eleven months. Cycle counting catches problems while they’re still small and cheap to fix.
Treating every sales channel as the same pool of stock. A business selling in-store and online without synced inventory will eventually oversell a product on one channel while it sits unsold in the other.
Ignoring supplier lead time until it becomes urgent. Reorder points built on the assumption that a supplier will always deliver on time tend to fail exactly when they’re needed most – during a supplier’s own busy season.
Not distinguishing A items from C items. Applying the same level of attention to a top seller and a slow-moving accessory wastes time on the products that matter least and under-manages the ones that matter most.
Advertisement
Where to Start
A small business doesn’t need every method in this guide running at once. The practical starting point is narrower: pick a tracking system, calculate reorder points for the products that actually drive revenue, and build in a counting rhythm that catches errors before they compound. Everything else – software, KPIs, more advanced methods like EOQ – is worth adding once that foundation is in place, not before.
SoundHound AI, Inc. (SOUN) Q2 2026 Earnings Call August 5, 2026 5:00 PM EDT
Company Participants
Scott Smith – Head of Investor Relations Keyvan Mohajer – Co-Founder, CEO, President & Director James Hom – Co-Founder, Interim CFO, Chief Product Officer & Director
Advertisement
Conference Call Participants
Thomas Blakey – Cantor Fitzgerald & Co., Research Division Gil Luria – D.A. Davidson & Co., Research Division Vijay Devar Leo Carpio – Joseph Gunnar & Co., LLC, Research Division
Presentation
Advertisement
Operator
Good day, and thank you for standing by. Welcome to SoundHound AI Q2 2026 Earnings Conference Call. [Operator Instructions] Please be advised that today’s conference is being recorded. I would now like to hand the conference over to your first speaker today, Scott Smith, Investor Relations.
Scott Smith Head of Investor Relations
Advertisement
Good afternoon, and thank you for joining our second quarter 2026 conference call. With me today is our CEO and co-founder Keyvan Mohajer; and our CFO and co-founder, James Hom. We will begin with some short remarks before moving to Q&A.
We’d also like to remind everyone that we will be making forward-looking statements on this call. Actual results could differ materially from those suggested by our forward-looking statements. Please refer to our filings with the SEC for a detailed discussion of the risks and uncertainties that could affect our business and for a discussion of the statements that qualify as forward-looking statements.
In addition, we may discuss certain non-GAAP measures. Please refer to today’s press release for more detailed financial results and further details on the definitions, limitations and uses of those measures and reconciliations from GAAP to non-GAAP.
Also note that the forward-looking statements on this call are based on information available to us as of today’s date. We undertake no obligation to update any forward-looking statements, except as required by law.
Stocks are rallying amid strong earnings and comments by Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent that a deal with Iran to reopen the Strait of Hormuz could come “today or tomorrow.”
The Dow industrials jumped 1,000 points, trading in record territory for the second straight day. The S&P 500 rose nearly 2% and is also poised to hit a record. The Nadsaq composite surged more than 2%.
Just 50 miles from the thriving Somerset grapevines, Phil Collins shows me a much sadder sight.
“Six and a half thousand cauliflowers here, which have just basically cooked,” he explained.
The leaves are brown and crispy. Inside there are tiny cauliflowers, brown and dried up. We walk on, through a field of potatoes, the plants shrivelled to nothing and lying brown on the soil.
“This is Marfona, which is meant to be a drought resistant variety,” Collins said.
Advertisement
“But this year has just been so dry, it couldn’t cope with it. The plants should be two foot high and green – there’s nothing left there.”
He and his team sell veg through farmers’ markets, but still compete with supermarket prices. If he was to irrigate all his crops to keep them alive, the costs would be so high his cauliflowers, spuds and carrots would be far pricier than supermarket alternatives.
He picks runner beans each morning, and is getting “about a third of the normal crop”.
“I’ve never had an overdraft in thirty years,” he said. “This year has been so bad, we’ve no choice. We will get over it, but it’ll take a while.”
Axis Securities has identified 7 mid and smallcap stocks for August. These selections offer potential upside and are based on company growth prospects. Dalmia Bharat and LG Electronics are among the recommended midcap companies. APL Apollo Tubes and Ujjivan Small Finance Bank also feature in this list. Minda Corporation and Healthcare Global Enterprises complete the analyst’s picks.
SYDNEY — Australia’s benchmark S&P/ASX 200 index climbed to a fresh record high Thursday, trading at 9,255.2 points, up 27.4 points or 0.30%, as of 2:37 p.m. AEST, marking the index’s second consecutive all-time high after a strong session Wednesday that surprised many market watchers who had grown accustomed to Australian shares lagging their global peers.
Thursday’s gain built directly on Wednesday’s session, when the ASX 200 added 0.9% to close at a lifetime peak of 9,227.80 points, extending the index’s gains since the start of August to 2.8%. New Zealand’s benchmark index also finished at a record Wednesday, climbing 0.7% to 13,997.18 points, as strength spread across both markets.
A Surprising Turnaround for a Perceived Laggard
The rally marks a notable shift in narrative for the Australian sharemarket, which had spent much of the past 12 months trailing international peers, largely attributed to its limited direct exposure to artificial intelligence-related technology stocks. That relative underweight to AI, long viewed as a drag on the index’s performance during the sector’s rapid ascent, has instead become an unlikely source of strength in recent sessions.
Advertisement
UBS strategist Richard Schellbach has pointed to Australia’s limited pure AI technology exposure as a factor that has repeatedly benefited the ASX during periods of global AI sector disruption, drawing interest from Asian investors at moments when AI chip stocks elsewhere have struggled. As cracks appeared in parts of the global AI trade in recent weeks, institutional funds rotated capital toward Australia, drawn by the market’s comparatively lower concentration risk in the sector. Commentators tracking the move have likened the index’s unexpected outperformance to Australian short-track speed skater Steven Bradbury, who famously won an Olympic gold medal in 2002 after every other skater in his race crashed, with some in the market now referring to the ASX as the “Steven Bradbury of financial markets.”
Sector Performance Diverges Sharply
Beneath Wednesday’s headline gain, performance varied considerably across sectors. Materials led the market with a 3.56% surge, while Information Technology added 2.51% and Industrials contributed a further 1.01% gain. By contrast, the Energy sector tumbled 2.22% and Financials slipped 0.44%, a divergence analysts attributed to shifting expectations around the trajectory of commodity prices and interest rates. The broader All Ordinaries Index climbed 1% to 9,405.40 on Wednesday, though it remained just below the 9,436.20 level it reached in an earlier March high.
By Thursday afternoon, that sector rotation appeared to be continuing, with Materials up 1.1% and Financials up a more modest 0.3%, both having pulled back from earlier session highs of 2.2% and 0.6%, respectively. Even so, both sectors have posted substantial gains over recent weeks, with Materials up 7.5% over the past five trading sessions and Financials up roughly 10% since the start of July.
Advertisement
Gold and Base Metals Lead Individual Movers
Wednesday’s standout individual performers clustered heavily around gold and base metals producers. Capricorn Metals surged 8.74% to $14.19, Genesis Minerals jumped 8.24% to $6.44, and Bellevue Gold climbed 8.08% to $1.405. Several other miners, including Predictive Discovery, Ora Banda Mining and Vault Minerals, all posted gains exceeding 7.5% during the session, reflecting broad strength across the domestic gold sector even as bullion prices themselves moved only modestly.
A Rally Fueled by Global Tailwinds
The rally in Sydney has closely tracked developments overseas. Equities in Australia and New Zealand closed at record highs Wednesday alongside a broader rally in U.S. and European shares, driven in part by strong AI-related corporate earnings and growing optimism over easing tensions in the Middle East tied to the Strait of Hormuz. That risk appetite carried into Thursday’s session, with improving global technology sentiment combining with continued strength across mining and financial sectors to push the ASX 200 to its second straight record.
Advertisement
A fourth consecutive session of gains through Wednesday pushed the benchmark’s relative strength index into overbought territory, reaching its highest level since mid-June 2025, a technical signal some analysts have pointed to as evidence the rally may be due for at least a temporary pause even as the broader trend has remained firmly positive.
New Listings Add to Market Activity
Thursday’s session also featured corporate developments beyond the index’s daily movements. Commodities giant Glencore has confirmed plans to pursue a secondary listing on the ASX, targeting Australia’s roughly $4.4 trillion pension pool, which is projected to nearly triple to $12.4 trillion by 2045. The listing, to be structured through CHESS Depositary Interests, would proceed without any capital raising or share transfer. Glencore chief executive Gary Nagle has said he expects the company to qualify for ASX 200 inclusion within about 12 months, requiring roughly $1.5 billion of local market capitalization, before eventually qualifying for the ASX 100 as well.
Reporting Season in Full Swing
Advertisement
Thursday’s trading also coincided with the height of Australia’s corporate reporting season, with more than 250 ASX-listed companies expected to report earnings or dividend updates over the coming weeks. That steady stream of company-specific news has added to the volatility underlying individual stock movements even as the broader index has continued grinding to new highs, with investors weighing individual earnings results against the more supportive macro backdrop driving the market’s overall direction.
With the ASX 200 now on track for its second consecutive record close, market watchers are likely to continue closely tracking whether Australia’s relative shelter from the recent AI sector volatility persists, or whether renewed strength in U.S. technology shares eventually reasserts the index’s more familiar pattern of trailing global peers. For now, the combination of strong mining and financial sector performance, continued reporting season activity, and improving global risk sentiment has positioned the Australian sharemarket for a rare stretch atop the list of the world’s best-performing major indexes.
shares plunged Wednesday, closing down 30.48% at $33.90, after the solar equipment maker’s disappointing third-quarter revenue outlook overshadowed a second-quarter report that beat Wall Street’s earnings expectations, dragging shares of several other solar companies lower in sympathy.
The stock, which had gained roughly 27% for the year heading into the report, gave back a substantial portion of those gains in a single trading session, marking one of the sharpest single-day declines the company has experienced in recent memory. Shares showed a partial rebound overnight, rising 2.04% to $34.59 as of 12:39 a.m. Eastern time Thursday, though the stock remained well below its pre-earnings level.
A Mixed Quarter With a Bright Spot
SolarEdge reported second-quarter revenue of $346.2 million, up 19.6% from a year earlier and narrowly ahead of Wall Street’s consensus estimate. Gross margin improved sharply to 27.5%, up from just 11.1% in the same quarter a year earlier, reflecting continued progress in the company’s efforts to rebuild profitability after a prolonged industry downturn.
Advertisement
On an adjusted, non-GAAP basis, SolarEdge posted earnings of 5 cents per share, a swing from a loss of 81 cents per share in the same period last year and a result that comfortably cleared analyst expectations. Under standard GAAP accounting, however, the company still reported a net loss of $30.8 million, or 50 cents per share, an improvement from a loss of 95 cents per share in the first quarter of 2026 and a substantial improvement from the $124.7 million, or $2.13 per share, loss recorded in the second quarter of last year.
Guidance Undercuts the Recovery Narrative
Despite the improved margins and narrower losses, investors focused overwhelmingly on SolarEdge’s forecast for the current quarter, which fell well short of expectations. The company guided to third-quarter revenue of $310 million to $340 million, a range that sits below the second quarter’s own revenue total and well under Wall Street’s expectations of more than $370 million.
That guidance suggested to many analysts that SolarEdge’s fragile recovery may remain uneven, undercutting the more encouraging signals from the quarter’s underlying earnings performance. Immediately following the results, shares initially traded down between 8.3% and 22.3% in various sessions of trading before ultimately settling at the steeper 30.48% decline by Wednesday’s close, reflecting a market that grew increasingly skeptical as the day progressed.
Advertisement
Regional Demand Diverges Sharply
SolarEdge Chief Executive Shuki Nir attributed much of the company’s ongoing challenges to a stark divergence in regional demand. Nir said the company continues to make progress as solar demand remains strong in Europe and is improving across the commercial and industrial segments of the U.S. market. That strength, however, has not been enough to offset persistent weakness in the U.S. residential solar sector, which has continued to struggle amid higher interest rates and shifting state-level incentive policies that have curbed household demand for rooftop solar installations.
A Volatile Pattern Heading Into Earnings
Wednesday’s selloff extended a pattern of volatility that has defined SolarEdge’s stock over the past several quarters. The company’s first-quarter results, released in May, saw revenue rise 46% year over year to $310 million, beating estimates, but adjusted earnings per share of negative 43 cents missed forecasts by more than 50%, sending shares down more than 7% in premarket trading at the time. A $14 million charge tied to doubtful debt contributed to a widening net loss in that period, illustrating the kind of one-off financial pressures that have periodically complicated the company’s underlying operational recovery.
Advertisement
Ahead of Wednesday’s report, Wall Street had entered with cautious optimism, projecting earnings of roughly negative 2 cents per share on revenue of about $341 million, positioning the actual results as a mixed but directionally positive surprise on the bottom line, even as the more forward-looking guidance ultimately drove the stock’s reaction.
Broader Solar Sector Feels the Pressure
SolarEdge’s steep decline rippled across the broader solar industry Wednesday, with shares of several other major solar companies trading lower in sympathy. First Solar, Enphase Energy, Fluence Energy, Array Technologies and Sunrun all declined alongside SolarEdge, as investors reassessed the health of the broader U.S. solar demand environment in light of the company’s cautious third-quarter outlook.
A Company Still Working Toward Sustained Profitability
Advertisement
Despite the disappointing guidance, some of SolarEdge’s underlying financial trends have shown improvement over a longer time horizon. The company’s two-year annualized earnings-per-share growth rate of 59.9% has outpaced its longer five-year trend, an encouraging signal even as the company’s earnings remain negative overall. Wall Street analysts have forecast that SolarEdge’s full-year adjusted earnings per share could flip from a loss of 83 cents to a projected profit of 92 cents over the next 12 months, reflecting continued optimism about the company’s longer-term trajectory even amid near-term volatility.
Even so, some of the company’s underlying structural challenges have persisted for years. SolarEdge’s operating margin came in at negative 4.6% for the quarter, and the company’s earnings per share have declined by an average of 16.9% annually over the past five years, a steeper drop than its revenue decline over the same period, reflecting a fixed cost base that has made it difficult for the company to adjust quickly to shifting demand conditions across its core markets.
With SolarEdge’s stock now trading well below its pre-earnings level despite the quarter’s improved margins and narrower losses, investors are likely to focus closely on whether the company can translate its stated progress in Europe and the U.S. commercial and industrial segments into a more encouraging outlook when it next reports results. Until residential demand in the U.S. shows clearer signs of stabilizing, analysts say SolarEdge’s recovery is likely to remain a story of incremental operational improvement overshadowed by continued uncertainty about the pace of the broader solar market’s rebound.
Bianco Research President Jim Bianco weighs in on AI resulting in groupthink investing and SpaceX hitting the market on Making Money.
Investors are turning to artificial intelligence (AI) tools for guidance on their finances and investments, though they remain skeptical of its output and continue to lean on human advice ahead of key decisions, new data shows.
A new study by Gallup conducted in partnership with Edward Jones found that about three-quarters of Americans have sought financial guidance from at least once source in the last year.
Advertisement
Among those U.S. adults who have done so, 73% used their own internet research, while 35% talked to family members, 32% sought out professional financial advisors, 26% leaned on news or social media, and 23% talked to their friends. Another 18% sought financial guidance from AI tools like ChatGPT and Claude, among others.
Americans have broad confidence in financial advisors, with about one-in-four saying they have a great deal of confidence in them, Gallup found. (istock)
The level of confidence in the advice they received varies widely based on the source – 79% of American adults had at least some confidence in financial advisors, with about one-quarter having a great deal of confidence. By contrast, less than three in 10 have at least some confidence in AI for financial guidance, with just 3% saying they have a great deal of confidence.
David Chubak, head of wealth management at Edward Jones, told FOX Business that what the research “reaffirms to us is that when it comes to the conversation of consequence, to making a real-life decision, people aren’t ready to trust AI as the decision maker for them, as the counselor.”
Advertisement
“Rather, they are still relying on their financial advisor as their trusted human partner to help them think through the process, the experience of that decision.”
“AI, as we see it, plays an important role in some of the discovery and approach to people improving their finances. When it comes to improving their financial fulfillment, people still believe inherently in the importance of a human, trust relationship,” he added.
The study found that about 18% of American adults have used AI tools for financial guidance. (iStock/Getty Images Plus)
Chubak said that AI searches for financial guidance often involve the use of what he called “tactical” questions involving things like getting information about 401(k) retirement plans, 529 education savings accounts or the recently-launched Trump Accounts.
Advertisement
He said that individuals are generally not spending as much time with AI tools when it comes to addressing things like the purpose of their personal financial planning and the anxieties they may have about that.
Chubak said that AI can help an individual refine their financial questions or concerns, which can be addressed with a human advisor. (iStock)
“There, they’re going to the advisor to have that conversation, to unroot what the real question is that they’re trying to solve and then try to solve it with them,” Chubak said.
He added that the more tactical or discovery-oriented interactions with AI tools can “really help them identify when they need an advisor,” as well as to help them “sharpen where the focus areas that they want to go are, so that the advisor can really hone in on the most impactful opportunities.”
You must be logged in to post a comment Login