Connect with us
DAPA Banner

Business

Medik8 Physical Sunscreen SPF50+ Urgently Recalled in Australia Over Failure to Meet Advertised SPF Rating

Published

on

Medik8 Physical Sunscreen SPF50+ Urgently Recalled in Australia Over Failure

SYDNEY — Three variants of Medik8 Physical Sunscreen SPF50+ are being urgently recalled in Australia and New Zealand after testing showed the products may not deliver the level of sun protection claimed on their labels, the Therapeutic Goods Administration announced.

Medik8 Physical Sunscreen SPF50+ Urgently Recalled in Australia Over Failure
Medik8 Physical Sunscreen SPF50+ Urgently Recalled in Australia Over Failure to Meet Advertised SPF Rating

AC Newco Pty Ltd, trading as Advanced Cosmeceuticals and acting on behalf of the UK-based skincare brand Medik8, initiated the voluntary recall of all unexpired batches of the affected sunscreens on April 1, 2026. The recall covers five specific batches across three products: the standard Physical Sunscreen SPF50+ 60mL, the Professional version 60mL, and the 15mL “Try Me” size often included in post-treatment kits.

The TGA warning states the products are “unlikely to meet their labelled Sun Protection Factor (SPF) rating.” A lower-than-advertised SPF increases the risk of sunburn during use and may reduce long-term protection against skin cancer, the agency noted.

Affected batches include:

  • Physical Sunscreen SPF50+ Professional 60mL (ARTG 331064): Batch A1798B (expiry August 2026) and Batch A2651A (expiry April 2028)
  • Physical Sunscreen SPF50+ 60mL (ARTG 331064): Batch A1798B and Batch A2651B (both with August 2026 or April 2028 expiry dates)
  • Physical Sunscreen SPF50+ Try Me 15mL (ARTG 331064): Affected batches included in certain kits

The products were sold in Australia and New Zealand between August 2023 and March 2026. Consumers who purchased any of these items are urged to stop using them immediately and return them to the place of purchase for a full refund. Alternatively, they can contact the recall hotline at 02 7248 5617 or email medik8spfrecall@acskingroup.com, providing proof of purchase or a photo of the product and batch details.

Medik8 described the action as a precautionary measure following updated independent SPF testing. In a statement shared with media outlets, the brand emphasized its commitment to product safety and quality. “We are voluntarily recalling Medik8 Physical Sunscreen SPF 50 from the Australian and New Zealand market,” the company told Allure magazine. No similar recall has been announced for other markets where the sunscreen is sold.

Advertisement

The recall highlights ongoing scrutiny of sunscreen efficacy in Australia, a country with one of the highest rates of skin cancer in the world. Australian sunscreen standards are among the strictest globally, requiring products to undergo rigorous in-vitro and in-vivo testing to verify SPF claims. The TGA regularly monitors compliance and has issued previous recalls for sunscreens failing to meet labeled protection levels.

Dermatologists and skin cancer experts stressed the importance of using reliable sunscreens. “An SPF50+ product that underperforms could leave users with a false sense of security, especially during peak UV hours,” said Dr. Elena Thompson, a Sydney-based dermatologist. “Broad-spectrum protection against UVA and UVB rays is critical, and consumers should always check for the Australian TGA listing number on the packaging.”

The affected Medik8 sunscreen is a physical (mineral) formula relying on zinc oxide and titanium dioxide for protection. These ingredients sit on the skin’s surface to reflect UV rays rather than absorbing them, making the product popular among those with sensitive skin. However, formulation stability, particle size and proper application all influence real-world performance.

Consumers with the recalled products should dispose of them safely if a return is not possible, though the TGA encourages returns to facilitate proper accounting and potential further testing. No reports of adverse events linked to the products have been publicly detailed, but the agency advises anyone experiencing unusual skin reactions after use to seek medical advice and report it via the TGA website.

Advertisement

The recall comes during the southern hemisphere’s autumn, but UV levels remain high in many parts of Australia, particularly in northern regions. Health authorities continue to recommend daily sunscreen use as part of sun-safe behavior, alongside protective clothing, hats, sunglasses and seeking shade during peak sun hours (typically 10 a.m. to 3 p.m.).

Medik8, known for its professional-grade skincare focused on ingredients like vitamin C, retinoids and antioxidants, has built a loyal following in Australia through clinics and selected retailers. The brand’s Physical Sunscreen was marketed as a lightweight, non-greasy option suitable for daily wear under makeup or alone.

This is not the first time a premium sunscreen brand has faced SPF-related issues in Australia. Previous recalls have involved both local and imported products, underscoring the challenges of maintaining consistent protection in real-world manufacturing and storage conditions.

The TGA maintains a public database of recalls and safety alerts. Consumers can check the agency’s website or the product’s ARTG entry (331064) for the latest updates. Pharmacies and retailers that stocked the Medik8 sunscreen have been notified and are expected to remove affected stock from shelves.

Advertisement

For those seeking alternatives, the TGA recommends choosing sunscreens with clear SPF50+ or SPF50 labeling, broad-spectrum protection and a visible ARTG number. Water-resistant formulas may be preferable for outdoor activities, but all sunscreens should be reapplied every two hours or after swimming or sweating.

Skin cancer prevention remains a public health priority in Australia, with campaigns like Slip, Slop, Slap, Seek and Slide reinforcing comprehensive sun protection strategies. Experts note that no sunscreen offers 100% protection, making layered approaches essential.

As the recall progresses, AC Newco and Medik8 are working with the TGA to manage returns and refunds efficiently. The company has assured customers that other Medik8 products are unaffected and continue to meet all safety and efficacy standards.

Consumers with questions about the recall or concerns about sun protection are encouraged to consult their pharmacist, dermatologist or visit the TGA website for further guidance. With skin cancer rates remaining high, authorities stress the importance of using verified, effective sunscreens as part of daily routines.

Advertisement

The incident serves as a reminder that even established brands can face quality control challenges, and regulatory oversight plays a vital role in protecting public health. Australians are advised to stay vigilant with product recalls and prioritize sun safety measures throughout the year.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

Business

FBI Analyzes New Evidence as Sheriff Faces Scrutiny

Published

on

Wordle puzzle

TUCSON, Ariz. — The search for 84-year-old Nancy Guthrie, mother of NBC “Today” show co-anchor Savannah Guthrie, reached its 85th day on Sunday with no arrests and her whereabouts still unknown, as the FBI continues analyzing new forensic evidence including hairs recovered from her Catalina Foothills home while the Pima County Sheriff’s Department draws criticism over investigative missteps and public communications.

Guthrie was last seen Jan. 31 after visiting her daughter Annie’s home. She failed to appear for a virtual church service the next day, prompting a missing persons report Feb. 1. Authorities quickly classified the case as an abduction after finding bloodstains matching her DNA on the front porch. Surveillance footage captured a masked, gloved suspect yanking her Ring camera before the apparent struggle.

The FBI has taken a more prominent role, sending hairs and other items found inside the home to its laboratory for advanced testing after initial local analysis. Sources close to the investigation told NewsNation the new evidence could yield critical leads. Gloves discovered about two miles away yielded unknown male DNA that has not matched CODIS or the scene, adding to the puzzle.

Pima County Sheriff Chris Nanos has repeatedly stated the family is fully cooperative and cleared of suspicion, calling rumors otherwise “cruel.” He maintains belief that Nancy could still be alive, though no confirmed sightings or credible ransom resolutions have emerged despite early notes received by the family. A $1 million family reward remains active for information leading to her recovery.

Advertisement

Recent weeks brought confusion and backlash after the sheriff’s department posted on social media that “Nancy has been located,” accompanied by a flyer. The post actually referred to a different elderly woman, Nancy Radakovich, who had been found safe. Critics labeled the communication “tone deaf” and insensitive to the Guthrie family’s ongoing anguish.

Nanos denied recent reports of another person detained south of Tucson for questioning, responding curtly with “Nope” when asked by reporters. Legal commentator Nancy Grace had highlighted the potential development on her program, fueling speculation before the denial.

Internal challenges have surfaced. Sources told NewsNation the homicide unit supervisor assigned early in the case had never previously worked a homicide investigation, contributing to alleged early mistakes. The department faced a no-confidence vote from deputies earlier in the probe. Increased patrols continue in the neighborhood, with officers sealing off streets and questioning residents about unusual activity, including possible internet disruptions the night of the abduction.

Savannah Guthrie returned to the “Today” show in early April, delivering an emotional message of hope while acknowledging the family’s pain. She and her siblings have shared public appeals, emphasizing key dates including Jan. 11 — weeks before the disappearance — that may connect to unusual activity around their mother’s home. The family donated $500,000 to the National Center for Missing & Exploited Children.

Advertisement

Investigators believe Guthrie was specifically targeted. Her physical limitations make it unlikely she wandered off, and the violent scene at the threshold suggests a swift, planned operation. A propped-open back door noted by family members added to the mystery, as did the suspect’s apparent preparation with gloves and mask.

The case has drawn national fascination and volunteer efforts, including from groups like the United Cajun Navy. Amateur searches and tip lines have generated tens of thousands of leads, though officials stress the need for verified information to avoid hindering progress.

As spring advances in the desert, concerns grow over time-sensitive evidence and Nancy’s health if she remains held. Temperatures in the region can fluctuate dramatically, complicating any outdoor scenarios. No confirmed second location has been identified despite extensive searches.

Sheriff Nanos has asked for public patience while promising the investigation remains active with dedicated detectives and federal partners. FBI agents have canvassed neighborhoods multiple times, focusing on surveillance, timelines and digital forensics. A related January incident at or near the home is reportedly under review.

Advertisement

Experts, including retired FBI agents, have offered varied assessments. Some predict an eventual “underwhelming” suspect reveal — perhaps someone with tangential connections rather than a sophisticated operation. Others note the amateurish elements captured on camera alongside signs of planning.

The high-profile nature has amplified scrutiny of the Pima County Sheriff’s Office leadership. Separate controversies involving Sheriff Nanos’ past have overlapped with the case, though officials insist resources remain focused on finding Nancy.

For the Guthrie family, each passing day brings renewed heartache alongside determination. Savannah has described details that “don’t add up,” including the family’s initial fears of ransom and the surreal nature of the ordeal. Public support has poured in, with well-wishers and true-crime communities sharing the reward flyer widely.

No timeline for resolution exists. Officials continue urging anyone with information — no matter how small — to contact the FBI tip line or sheriff’s department. The $1 million reward can be paid anonymously in cash if it leads to Nancy’s recovery or the arrest and conviction of those responsible.

Advertisement

As the investigation stretches into its third month, the blend of forensic diligence, community vigilance and family resilience defines the effort. Nancy Guthrie remains missing, but authorities and loved ones refuse to give up hope that answers — and her safe return — remain possible.

This story continues to develop. Updates will follow any new forensic results, tips or statements from officials.

Continue Reading

Business

ICE detains family less than two days after court ordered their release, lawyers say

Published

on

ICE detains family less than two days after court ordered their release, lawyers say


ICE detains family less than two days after court ordered their release, lawyers say

Continue Reading

Business

Semiconductor Stocks Are on a Historic Winning Streak. Why It’s Time to Cash In.

Published

on

Semiconductor Stocks Are on a Historic Winning Streak. Why It’s Time to Cash In.

Semiconductor Stocks Are on a Historic Winning Streak. Why It’s Time to Cash In.

Continue Reading

Business

Trump removed from White House correspondents dinner as attendees take cover

Published

on


Trump removed from White House correspondents dinner as attendees take cover

Continue Reading

Business

Why Trade Desk Stock Could Be the Next Big Short Squeeze

Published

on

Why Trade Desk Stock Could Be the Next Big Short Squeeze

Why Trade Desk Stock Could Be the Next Big Short Squeeze

Continue Reading

Business

Pulse Biosciences, Inc. (PLSE) Shareholder/Analyst Call Transcript

Published

on

OneWater Marine Inc. (ONEW) Q1 2026 Earnings Call Transcript

Pulse Biosciences, Inc. (PLSE) Shareholder/Analyst Call April 25, 2026 1:45 PM EDT

Company Participants

Paul LaViolette – President, CEO & Co-Chairman of the Board
Robert Duggan
Darrin Uecker – CTO & Director
David Kenigsberg – Chief Medical Officer
Liane Teplitsky – Chief Operating Officer

Conference Call Participants

Advertisement

Anthony Petrone – Mizuho Securities USA LLC, Research Division
Joshua Jennings – TD Cowen, Research Division

Presentation

Paul LaViolette
President, CEO & Co-Chairman of the Board

Advertisement

Good afternoon, everybody. I’m Paul LaViolette, Chief Executive Officer of Pulse Biosciences. Really proud to have this gathering at HRS. We’ve been trying to provide updates at every single critical meeting on the itinerary symposium. And today represents a really nice opportunity for us to see you again.

Before we dive in, I just want to introduce a few of the Pulse members who will not be presenting today. I’ll be joined by Dr. Kenigsberg and Darrin Uecker, momentarily, our Chief Medical Officer, Chief Technology Officer, respectively. I want to introduce Bob Duggan. Bob is our Chairman, our principal investor and really the visionary for the last decade behind the establishment of nsPFA as a next-generation energy to ablate in EP and many other parts of the body, as you’re aware.

Robert Duggan

Advertisement

And I’ll defer to Darrin Uecker always.

Paul LaViolette
President, CEO & Co-Chairman of the Board

Darrin is our Bob whisperer. I also want to introduce Liane Teplitsky. There she is, Liane. Liane has just joined us as Chief Operating Officer. Liane has a pronounced career in med tech, but emphatically 18 or so years in the EP space. Knows many of our clinicians, knows the AFib technology area intimately. We’re super happy to have her join and to add some extra horsepower in the drive of our clinical, regulatory and commercial areas.

Advertisement

Also joining Jon Skinner, our

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Business

Texas Capital Bancshares, Inc. 2026 Q1 – Results – Earnings Call Presentation (NASDAQ:TCBI) 2026-04-25

Published

on

OneWater Marine Inc. (ONEW) Q1 2026 Earnings Call Transcript

Q1: 2026-04-23 Earnings Summary

EPS of $1.58 beats by $0.17

 | Revenue of $323.99M (15.51% Y/Y) beats by $5.06M

This article was written by

Seeking Alpha’s transcripts team is responsible for the development of all of our transcript-related projects. We currently publish thousands of quarterly earnings calls per quarter on our site and are continuing to grow and expand our coverage. The purpose of this profile is to allow us to share with our readers new transcript-related developments. Thanks, SA Transcripts Team

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Business

Global central banks brace for ’holding pattern’ as energy volatility bites

Published

on


Global central banks brace for ’holding pattern’ as energy volatility bites

Continue Reading

Business

US-Iran peace hopes fade as Trump scraps talks

Published

on


US-Iran peace hopes fade as Trump scraps talks

Continue Reading

Business

Origin Bancorp, Inc. 2026 Q1 – Results – Earnings Call Presentation (NYSE:OBK) 2026-04-25

Published

on

OneWater Marine Inc. (ONEW) Q1 2026 Earnings Call Transcript

Q1: 2026-04-22 Earnings Summary

EPS of $0.90 beats by $0.01

 | Revenue of $104.04M (10.61% Y/Y) beats by $63.50K

This article was written by

Seeking Alpha’s transcripts team is responsible for the development of all of our transcript-related projects. We currently publish thousands of quarterly earnings calls per quarter on our site and are continuing to grow and expand our coverage. The purpose of this profile is to allow us to share with our readers new transcript-related developments. Thanks, SA Transcripts Team

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2025