This article was written by

Follow

Analyst’s Disclosure: I/we have no stock, option or similar derivative position in any of the companies mentioned, and no plans to initiate any such positions within the next 72 hours. I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it (other than from Seeking Alpha). I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.

Seeking Alpha’s Disclosure: Past performance is no guarantee of future results. No recommendation or advice is being given as to whether any investment is suitable for a particular investor. Any views or opinions expressed above may not reflect those of Seeking Alpha as a whole. Seeking Alpha is not a licensed securities dealer, broker or US investment adviser or investment bank. Our analysts are third party authors that include both professional investors and individual investors who may not be licensed or certified by any institute or regulatory body.

Last week, the BSE benchmark Sensex declined 468.42 points, or 0.60 per cent, and the NSE Nifty dipped 114 points, or 0.46 per cent.

“Indian equity markets ended the week on a cautious note, extending their recent corrective phase as elevated crude oil prices, rising global bond yields and persistent geopolitical uncertainty weighed on investor sentiment,” Ajit Mishra – SVP, Research, Religare Broking Ltd, said.

The valuation of Bharti Airtel dropped Rs 28,052.96 crore to Rs 12,14,963.15 crore, the most among the top-10 firms.

Tata Consultancy Services (TCS) faced an erosion of Rs 22,070.34 crore from its valuation, which stood at Rs 8,31,436.51 crore.

Live Events

The market capitalisation (mcap) of the State Bank of India declined Rs 20,861.2 crore to Rs 9,64,968.76 crore and that of Hindustan Unilever fell Rs 16,975.79 crore to Rs 4,73,912.56 crore.
However, the valuation of Life Insurance Corporation of India (LIC) jumped Rs 12,650 crore to Rs 5,35,980.31 crore.The mcap of Reliance Industries surged Rs 8,119.53 crore to Rs 17,78,175.59 crore and that of Larsen & Toubro climbed Rs 3,487.83 crore to Rs 5,62,460.94 crore.

The market valuation of Bajaj Finance edged higher by Rs 3,424.28 crore to Rs 6,80,621.62 crore.

ICICI Bank added Rs 752.47 crore taking its mcap to Rs 10,18,330.45 crore.

The mcap of HDFC Bank went up Rs 356.95 crore to Rs 11,21,159.05 crore.

Reliance Industries remained the most valued firm, followed by Bharti Airtel, HDFC Bank, ICICI Bank, State Bank of India, TCS, Bajaj Finance, Larsen & Toubro, LIC and Hindustan Unilever. PTI

The inflow comes after FPIs invested Rs 20,200 crore in July, marking a sharp turnaround from four consecutive months of heavy selling and signalling renewed confidence in Indian equities.

FPIs had withdrawn Rs 49,340 crore in June, Rs 32,963 crore in May, Rs 60,847 crore in April and a massive Rs 1.17 lakh crore in March. Prior to this selling streak, they had invested Rs 22,615 crore in February, according to CDSL data.

Despite the recent buying, foreign investors have remained net sellers in Indian equities in 2026, withdrawing around Rs 2.3 lakh crore so far — exceeding the Rs 1.66 lakh crore outflow registered during the entire 2025.

“The factors that are driving the FPIs back to the Indian market are: earnings growth revival as reflected in Q1 results, FPI withdrawal from the ‘chip trade’, rupee stability and the impressive growth prospects of companies in the broader market,” V K Vijayakumar, Chief Investment Strategist, Geojit Investments, said.

Live Events

FPIs are not buying attractively valued leading large banking or IT stocks; instead they are selectively buying mid-caps despite elevated valuations, he added.
In the coming week, investors will closely track crude oil price movements and developments in the ongoing US-Iran geopolitical tensions for further direction in the market, Pabitro Mukherjee, Deputy Vice President-Research, Bajaj Broking, said.

Foreign investor interest has also extended to the debt market. They invested Rs 852 crore in debt through the Fully Accessible Route (FAR), while they pulled out Rs 995 crore through the general route during the period under review. PTI

HOUSTON — A Porter, Texas, man was sentenced to 14 days in federal prison and ordered to pay a $5,000 fine Friday after pleading guilty to shooting and killing a federally protected bald eagle in his backyard, then attempting to hide the wounded bird beneath a tarp in his garage.

Santos Guerrero, 43, was sentenced by U.S. Magistrate Judge Peter Bray following his guilty plea earlier this year, according to the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of Texas. Guerrero pleaded guilty on May 14, nearly two years after authorities said he shot the eagle at his home on Oct. 11, 2024.

According to federal prosecutors, authorities initially responded to the scene after receiving reports of the shooting. Investigators reviewed video footage showing the eagle being shot and falling from a tree, and they subsequently traveled to Guerrero’s home, where they identified the same tree captured in the footage. Investigators eventually located the injured bird hidden beneath a tarp inside Guerrero’s garage.

Prosecutors said Guerrero later lied to investigators about the incident. The court reviewed both surveillance video and body camera footage documenting the eagle both before it was shot and after it was subsequently discovered in Guerrero’s garage.

The eagle was transported to an animal hospital following its discovery, but veterinarians ultimately made the decision to euthanize the bird due to the severity of its injuries. According to federal prosecutors, a necropsy determined that the bullet had significantly damaged one of the eagle’s wings, while its subsequent fall from the tree caused additional serious injuries, including liver fractures, internal bleeding and a broken leg.

Although bald eagles have not been classified as an endangered species since 2007, the birds remain federally protected under the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act, a law that prohibits killing or possessing bald and golden eagles without proper authorization. Those protections extend beyond the birds themselves to also cover eagle parts, nests and eggs, meaning violations of the law can carry significant federal penalties regardless of an eagle’s current conservation status.

When Guerrero entered his guilty plea in May, prosecutors indicated he faced a potential sentence of up to one year in federal prison, along with a maximum fine of $100,000. Judge Bray’s ultimate sentence of 14 days in prison alongside the $5,000 fine fell considerably below that maximum potential penalty.

Following Friday’s sentencing, Guerrero remains free on bond. According to the U.S. Attorney’s Office, he will be required to voluntarily surrender to a Federal Bureau of Prisons facility that has not yet been determined, a common arrangement in federal cases involving relatively short custodial sentences, allowing the defendant to report to a designated facility on their own rather than being taken into custody immediately following sentencing.

The Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act, first enacted in 1940 and later amended to include golden eagles, has served as one of the primary federal legal tools used to prosecute individuals who kill or harm the birds, even in cases, such as Guerrero’s, where the shooting occurred on the defendant’s own private property. The law reflects the bald eagle’s enduring status as a national symbol of the United States, a designation that has continued to afford the species legal protection even after its formal removal from the federal endangered species list nearly two decades ago, a delisting that reflected a significant conservation success following decades of population decline driven largely by the pesticide DDT and habitat loss throughout the 20th century.

Federal wildlife protection cases involving bald eagles are prosecuted through the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service’s law enforcement division, working in coordination with U.S. Attorney’s offices across the country. Penalties for violations can vary significantly depending on the specific circumstances of a case, including whether a defendant is found to have acted knowingly, whether the bird’s death was accidental, and whether any additional conduct, such as Guerrero’s alleged false statements to investigators, factors into how prosecutors approach sentencing recommendations.

Cases involving the killing of protected bald eagles periodically draw significant public attention given the bird’s status as a national symbol, and federal prosecutors have continued to pursue charges against individuals found to have violated the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act in various parts of the country in recent years, reflecting the law’s ongoing role in protecting the species even outside its formal designation as endangered or threatened.

As of Friday’s sentencing, the case against Guerrero has concluded with his federal prison term and fine, closing out a legal process that spanned nearly two years from the original October 2024 shooting to his eventual guilty plea and sentencing. The U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of Texas has not indicated whether Guerrero faces any additional state-level charges connected to the incident beyond the federal case addressed in Friday’s sentencing hearing.

This article was written by

Follow

Analyst’s Disclosure: I/we have no stock, option or similar derivative position in any of the companies mentioned, and no plans to initiate any such positions within the next 72 hours. I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it (other than from Seeking Alpha). I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.

I intend to wait a few days after an article gets published before initiating a long position.

Seeking Alpha’s Disclosure: Past performance is no guarantee of future results. No recommendation or advice is being given as to whether any investment is suitable for a particular investor. Any views or opinions expressed above may not reflect those of Seeking Alpha as a whole. Seeking Alpha is not a licensed securities dealer, broker or US investment adviser or investment bank. Our analysts are third party authors that include both professional investors and individual investors who may not be licensed or certified by any institute or regulatory body.

President Donald Trump lashed out at Canada early Sunday in his first public comments since trade negotiations between the two countries collapsed, accusing Ottawa of wanting the “benefits of being a State, without being one.”

“Canada wants the benefits of being a State, without being one!!!” Trump wrote on Truth Social.

“They have also charged our great farmers, for many years, massive amounts of Tariffs,” he added. “No more!!!”

The comments come a day after Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney suspended negotiations with the U.S. and ordered Canada’s trade team back to Ottawa as Trump’s 50% tariffs on roughly $20 billion worth of Canadian imports took effect early Saturday.

CANADA’S CARNEY SAYS US MADE LAST-MINUTE ‘POWER PLAY’ AS TRADE TALKS COLLAPSE; RETALIATORY TARIFFS IN PLACE

President Donald Trump and Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney have traded criticism following the collapse of U.S.-Canada trade negotiations. (Anna Moneymaker/Getty Images / Getty Images)

For its part, Canada has vowed to retaliate.

Carney said Friday that Ottawa plans to match the U.S. tariffs “dollar for dollar,” with the levies targeting multiple sectors, including steel, dairy, appliances, agricultural equipment, pulp and paper and electronics.

The duties are set to take effect the Tuesday after Labor Day, Sept. 8.

The prime minister on Saturday accused Washington of making a last-minute “power play,” saying the U.S. sought to restrict Canada’s ability to negotiate trade agreements with other countries.

US-CANADA TRADE NEGOTIATIONS SUSPENDED, CARNEY VOWS DOLLAR-FOR-DOLLAR RETALIATION AGAINST TRUMP’S 50% TARIFFS

President Donald Trump lashed out at Canada in his first public comments since trade negotiations between the two countries collapsed, accusing Ottawa of wanting the “benefits of being a State, without being one.” (Shawn Thew/EPA/Bloomberg/Getty Images)

“It’s a power play,” Carney said. “It becomes a question of sovereignty.”

According to Carney, trade talks broke down after the U.S. introduced new demands involving Canada’s other trading relationships, its auto sector and protections for Canadian culture and the French language.

“In short, they asked too much, and they offered too little,” Carney said.

The Trump administration has disputed Carney’s version of events, arguing that Canada walked away from terms the two countries had already agreed to.

TRUMP ALLOWS 300,000 METRIC TONS OF TARIFF-FREE BEEF IMPORTS IN BID TO CUT PRICES, DRAWING RANCHER BACKLASH

Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney greets U.S. President Donald Trump at the official welcome ceremony during the G7 Leaders’ Summit on June 16, 2025 in Kananaskis, Alberta.  (Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images / Getty Images)

“Our interest is in protecting American workers and protecting American supply chains. We’ve been offering to bring the Canadians along on that path, really to cut the tariffs on them on steel, on autos, even lumber, things that are sensitive for them,” U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer said Saturday on “Fox & Friends Weekend.”

“And they’ve always had the best deal, and they still would have an even better deal, but they didn’t want that,” he continued.

Greer said no additional trade negotiations with Canada have been scheduled.

GET FOX BUSINESS ON THE GO BY CLICKING HERE

FOX Business’ Brittany Miller and Fox News Digital’s Madison Colombo contributed to this report.

However, fellow student Jessica, who is also going to study at Liverpool John Moores University, feels she will miss out.

She says she would have loved to live on campus and enjoy student life, but the price of renting is “ridiculous” and “insane”.

“I have a part-time job as everything is so expensive, and then commuting is going to kill a lot of my free time as well,” she says.

“It is a bit sad really when you think about it.”

But she is pleased that staying at home means she will still be able to have her mum and dad’s cooked dinners.

Earlier this year, BBC News followed the daily journey of one first-year student who said she was saving over £7,000 on accommodation by commuting 90 minutes into Manchester each day from home.

The figures were recorded on results day and are expected to rise over the coming month as more students accept university places through clearing.

A record number of UK 18-year-olds have been accepted into university this year.

But student rents have risen sharply in recent years, alongside other living costs.

The Higher Education Policy Institute (Hepi) said last year that students needed £61,000 over the course of a three-year degree in order to have a “minimum socially acceptable standard of living” – and that’s excluding tuition fees.

Its report found that in 2024 the cost of renting in university-owned accommodation ranged from £108 per week, for 40 to 44-week contracts in Northern Ireland, to £338 a week for the shortest contracts in London, where rent makes up nearly half (46%) of students’ costs.

In most areas it was between £140 and £180 a week, with private halls usually being more expensive.

Many students are eligible for a maintenance loan, which can help with the cost of accommodation, but the average annual price of a room on campus is increasing much faster, according to some student unions.

Hepi says most young full-time students now work in paid employment during term time to make up the difference between their maintenance loan income and the cost of living.

A small power plant has been shut down during a cyber attack.

The government said that at no point was there a risk to the UK’s energy system, but the Department for Energy Security and Net Zero (DESNZ) has contacted power companies to advise them about the risk of cyber attacks.

The Daily Telegraph reported that the attack, which took place last month, was carried out by hackers affiliated to the Iranian regime.

For security reasons, neither the government nor the National Cyber Security Centre, which deals with attacks on critical infrastructure, would give further details of the site affected. However this was not an attack on an essential service such as a large power station.

According to the Telegraph, external, the power plant was shut down for four days.

DESNZ said the incident had affected a small-scale generator and at no point had there been a risk to the wider energy system.

The UK’s power network has a number of smaller gas generators which provide short-term power when needed.

Protecting the country’s supplies is a key challenge for the government. It is updating its regulations for cyber security, and working on a new energy resilience strategy for later this year.

Iran has long been regarded as a capable cyber power but while the Western cyber-security world is braced for attacks either from the state or hackers linked to the state as a result of its conflict with the US this year, there has been little activity so far.

This article was written by

Follow

Analyst’s Disclosure: I/we have no stock, option or similar derivative position in any of the companies mentioned, and no plans to initiate any such positions within the next 72 hours. I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it (other than from Seeking Alpha). I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.

Seeking Alpha’s Disclosure: Past performance is no guarantee of future results. No recommendation or advice is being given as to whether any investment is suitable for a particular investor. Any views or opinions expressed above may not reflect those of Seeking Alpha as a whole. Seeking Alpha is not a licensed securities dealer, broker or US investment adviser or investment bank. Our analysts are third party authors that include both professional investors and individual investors who may not be licensed or certified by any institute or regulatory body.