This article was written by

Follow

Analyst’s Disclosure: I/we have a beneficial long position in the shares of AGM either through stock ownership, options, or other derivatives. I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it (other than from Seeking Alpha). I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.

I also have a long position in the Series F and G preferred shares.

Seeking Alpha’s Disclosure: Past performance is no guarantee of future results. No recommendation or advice is being given as to whether any investment is suitable for a particular investor. Any views or opinions expressed above may not reflect those of Seeking Alpha as a whole. Seeking Alpha is not a licensed securities dealer, broker or US investment adviser or investment bank. Our analysts are third party authors that include both professional investors and individual investors who may not be licensed or certified by any institute or regulatory body.

TEHRAN — Iran has quietly launched an ambitious new initiative to explore and develop vast natural gas reserves deep beneath the Strait of Hormuz, a strategic move that could significantly boost the country’s energy exports while raising tensions in one of the world’s most critical maritime chokepoints.

Iranian state media and energy officials confirmed this week that advanced seismic surveys and exploratory drilling preparations are underway in Iranian territorial waters within the strait. The project, codenamed “Hormuz Deep Gas,” targets previously untapped hydrocarbon formations lying more than 3,000 meters below the seabed, according to sources familiar with the program.

Energy analysts estimate the potential reserves could exceed 50 trillion cubic feet of natural gas, which would represent one of the largest discoveries in the region in decades. If commercially viable, the fields could transform Iran’s energy outlook, providing a major new revenue stream at a time when the country faces international sanctions and economic pressure.

“This is a strategic step toward energy independence and strengthening our position in global markets,” Iran’s Oil Minister Javad Owji said in a carefully worded statement. “We are committed to responsible development that respects international maritime law while securing our national interests.”

Strategic Location Raises Geopolitical Stakes

The Strait of Hormuz, through which roughly 20 percent of the world’s traded oil passes daily, has long been a flashpoint for regional tensions. Iran’s new underwater energy ambitions add another layer of complexity to an already volatile area, where naval incidents and territorial disputes regularly occur.

The exploratory work is reportedly taking place entirely within Iran’s recognized maritime boundaries, but neighboring countries including the United Arab Emirates, Saudi Arabia and Oman have expressed private concerns about potential environmental risks and overlapping claims. The United States Navy’s Fifth Fleet, which patrols the region, has increased monitoring of Iranian vessels involved in the project.

U.S. officials have not publicly commented on the specific initiative but have reiterated their commitment to freedom of navigation in the strait. “Any activities that threaten maritime safety or stability in this critical waterway will be taken seriously,” a Pentagon spokesperson said.

Technical Challenges and Development Plans

Developing gas fields at such extreme depths presents enormous technical challenges. Iran is working with Chinese and Russian energy firms to deploy advanced deep-water drilling technology, including specialized rigs capable of operating in high-pressure underwater environments. Initial seismic data collected over the past 18 months has reportedly identified multiple promising structures.

If successful, production could begin within five to seven years, with gas potentially liquefied for export or piped to Iranian power plants to reduce reliance on oil. Iranian officials envision the project as part of a broader strategy to diversify energy exports away from crude oil toward cleaner-burning natural gas.

Environmental groups have raised alarms about potential risks to the fragile marine ecosystem of the strait, which supports important fisheries and biodiversity. An oil or gas leak at such depths could be extremely difficult to contain and would have devastating long-term consequences for the region.

Economic Implications for Iran

Success in the Hormuz Deep Gas project could provide Iran with a significant economic lifeline. The country holds some of the world’s largest proven gas reserves but has struggled to develop them fully due to sanctions, outdated technology and lack of foreign investment.

New gas production could generate billions in annual revenue while helping Iran meet growing domestic electricity demand. It would also strengthen Tehran’s negotiating position in any future talks over its nuclear program and regional influence.

However, analysts caution that international sanctions continue to limit Iran’s ability to attract the massive foreign investment and technology transfers needed for deep-water projects. China has emerged as the most willing partner, but Western technology and expertise remain largely off-limits.

Regional and Global Reactions

Gulf Arab states have watched developments with concern. Saudi Arabia and the UAE, which compete with Iran in global energy markets, have quietly bolstered their own naval presence in the area. Oman, which sits on the other side of the strait, has called for calm and diplomatic dialogue.

Major energy consumers such as China, India, Japan and South Korea — all heavily dependent on oil and gas passing through the strait — are monitoring the situation closely. Any disruption to shipping or new environmental regulations stemming from the project could affect global energy prices.

Trump, who remains influential in U.S. politics, has previously warned Iran against actions that threaten energy security. His recent comments about the region have added to speculation about how a potential future U.S. administration might respond to Iranian moves in the strait.

Technical and Environmental Considerations

Deep-water gas development requires sophisticated engineering to withstand high pressures, corrosive seawater and seismic activity common in the region. Iran claims its partners have developed new technologies specifically suited to the geological conditions beneath the strait.

Environmental impact assessments are reportedly underway, though critics question their independence. The strait is already stressed by heavy shipping traffic, occasional oil spills and climate change effects. Any large-scale industrial activity on the seabed would require careful management to avoid damaging marine habitats and fisheries that support local communities.

What Comes Next

Iranian officials say exploratory drilling could begin within the next 12 to 18 months, pending final approvals and technical preparations. Success in the initial wells would likely trigger a major development phase involving multiple production platforms and subsea infrastructure.

The project’s progress will be closely watched by energy markets, naval forces and diplomatic observers worldwide. While Iran frames the initiative as a legitimate exercise of sovereign rights, the strategic location ensures it will remain a source of international tension and speculation.

For now, the waters of the Strait of Hormuz remain open for global commerce, but beneath the surface, Iran is quietly working to unlock new sources of power that could reshape regional energy dynamics for decades to come. The success or failure of this ambitious underwater venture may ultimately influence not just Iran’s economy but the broader geopolitics of energy in the 21st century.

Thousands of Long Island Rail Road workers are officially on strike as of midnight Saturday, effectively shutting down the nation’s busiest commuter railroad in its first strike in more than three decades and threatening major economic disruption across the New York region ahead of Memorial Day travel.

The strike halted service for roughly 300,000 daily riders after last-minute contract negotiations between the Metropolitan Transportation Authority and a coalition of five rail unions failed to produce a wage agreement.

The MTA confirmed Saturday that all LIRR service was suspended and warned there is “no substitute” for the railroad, urging commuters to work remotely if possible as officials brace for severe congestion and delays throughout the metropolitan region.

New York State Comptroller Thomas DiNapoli’s office estimated the strike could cost the regional economy up to $61 million per day in lost economic activity, as commuters scramble for alternatives and businesses prepare for disruptions.

GEN Z IS SINGLE-HANDEDLY BRINGING AMERICA’S SHOPPING MALLS BACK TO LIFE

Long Island Rail Road (LIRR) workers picket outside of Penn Station in New York, US, on Saturday, May 16, 2026. (Victor J. Blue/Bloomberg via Getty Images / Getty Images)

The labor action marks the first Long Island Rail Road strike since 1994. Union leaders said workers involved in the coalition have gone more than three years without raises while negotiating a new labor agreement.

“This strike would not have happened if the MTA and LIRR offered our members the reasonable terms the government recommended multiple times. But management refused,” Mark Wallace, president of the Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers and Trainmen and the Teamsters Rail Conference, said in a statement.  

NYC REAL ESTATE TITAN COMPARES ‘TAX THE RICH’ SLOGAN TO ‘DISGUSTING RACIAL SLURS’ AMID MAMDANI CLASH

“We hope LIRR gets serious soon to avoid further unnecessary disruptions for hundreds of thousands of New Yorkers. They know where to find us when they’re ready: on the streets.”

MTA officials defended their bargaining position, arguing the unions were demanding wage increases that could ultimately drive up fares and strain the transit system’s finances.

MTA Chair and CEO Janno Lieber said the agency “cannot responsibly make a deal that implodes MTA’s budget” and warned taxpayers and riders could ultimately bear the cost of larger wage increases.

A sign displaying the suspension of Long Island Rail Road (LIRR) service due to a strike, at Nostrand Avenue station in the Brooklyn borough of New York, US, on Saturday, May 16, 2026.  (Victor J. Blue/Bloomberg via Getty Images / Getty Images)

Lieber also accused union leaders of planning to strike regardless of the MTA’s offers, saying the latest proposal gave workers “everything they said they wanted in terms of pay.”

New York Gov. Kathy Hochul criticized the strike as “reckless,” warning it could hurt commuters, businesses and the broader regional economy. Hochul, who is seeking reelection later this year, said the unions’ demands could force fare hikes and higher taxes for Long Islanders.

President Donald Trump also weighed in on the dispute, blaming Hochul for allowing the strike to occur.

“If you can’t solve it, let me know, and I’ll show you how to properly get things done,” Trump wrote on Truth Social.

A commuter sits at the Long Island Rail Road (LIRR) station at Nostrand Avenue in the Brooklyn borough of New York, US, on Saturday, May 16, 2026.  (Victor J. Blue/Bloomberg via Getty Images / Getty Images)

The standoff underscores growing pressure facing public transit systems nationwide as labor unions push for higher wages while transit agencies continue grappling with post-pandemic budget pressures and shifting commuting patterns.

CLICK HERE TO GET FOX BUSINESS ON THE GO

Transit officials have not indicated when negotiations could resume or how long the strike may continue as commuters across the New York area seek alternative transportation options.

NEW YORK — GameStop Chairman Ryan Cohen is refusing to back down from his audacious $56 billion unsolicited bid to acquire eBay, firing back at the online marketplace’s board after it swiftly rejected the proposal as “neither credible nor attractive,” setting the stage for what could become one of the most contentious corporate battles of 2026.

Cohen, the activist investor who transformed GameStop into a meme-stock phenomenon, proposed buying eBay at $125 per share in a mix of cash and stock — a roughly 46% premium to where shares were trading before the offer became public. eBay’s board formally turned down the offer on May 12, citing concerns over financing, strategic fit, governance and the massive debt load it would create for the combined company.

In a pointed response letter released Wednesday, Cohen urged eBay directors not to dismiss the proposal without giving shareholders a chance to evaluate it. He accused the board of protecting their own interests and argued that eBay has become bloated and complacent, missing opportunities to compete more aggressively with Amazon. Cohen also hinted he may take the fight directly to eBay shareholders if the board continues to stonewall.

The dramatic exchange has Wall Street buzzing. Many analysts and investors have openly ridiculed the bid, questioning how GameStop — with a market capitalization of roughly $11 billion — could realistically finance a deal for a much larger company. Cohen has pointed to a “highly confident” financing letter from TD Bank for $20 billion in debt and GameStop’s ability to issue stock, but critics say the math still leaves a significant gap and would heavily dilute existing shareholders.

eBay’s Strong Rebuttal

eBay Chairman Paul S. Pressler, in the rejection letter, outlined multiple reasons for turning down the offer. The board expressed confidence in eBay’s standalone strategy, highlighted its recent growth in advertising revenue and GMV (gross merchandise volume), and raised red flags about GameStop’s track record and leadership incentives.

“After a thorough review, our board unanimously determined that the proposal is neither credible nor attractive,” Pressler wrote. The company also noted concerns about the high leverage that would result and potential disruptions to eBay’s operations under GameStop’s ownership.

eBay shares initially jumped on news of the bid but have since given back gains as skepticism grew. GameStop stock has been volatile, swinging on every new development in the saga.

Cohen’s Vision for a Combined Company

In interviews and public statements, Cohen has painted an ambitious picture of transforming eBay into a stronger competitor to Amazon. He envisions using GameStop’s physical stores as authentication and fulfillment hubs for collectibles and high-value items sold on eBay, cutting costs, improving trust and creating new revenue streams.

Cohen has also criticized eBay’s management for what he sees as slow innovation and excessive bureaucracy. In one memorable CNBC appearance, when pressed on financing details, he repeatedly directed viewers to the company’s website, leading to awkward moments that have since been widely memed.

Despite the ridicule, some observers believe Cohen should not be underestimated. His track record with GameStop — turning a dying retailer into a cultural phenomenon through meme power and activist pressure — shows his ability to mobilize retail investors and create chaos for corporate boards.

Financing Questions Loom Large

The biggest hurdle remains financing. GameStop holds roughly $9 billion in cash and equivalents but would need massive additional debt and equity issuance to reach $56 billion. Rating agencies have already warned that such leverage would be credit-negative for any combined entity.

Cohen maintains the economics make sense and that strategic value far exceeds the headline price. He has also jokingly listed personal items on eBay, claiming it as a way to “help pay for eBay,” which only added to the surreal nature of the saga.

Broader Implications for Tech and Retail

A successful takeover would create a strange hybrid of traditional e-commerce and physical retail with a heavy emphasis on collectibles, gaming and authenticated goods. It could also reshape competition in online marketplaces, potentially pressuring Amazon and other giants.

For eBay, the unsolicited bid has forced the board to defend its strategy publicly. The company has pointed to steady growth, strong cash flow and a diversified revenue base including advertising and payments as reasons for confidence in its independent future.

Wall Street’s reaction has been largely negative toward the deal’s feasibility. Several analysts downgraded GameStop or maintained cautious stances, citing execution risks and shareholder dilution. However, a vocal group of retail investors on platforms like Reddit’s r/Superstonk continues to rally behind Cohen, seeing the bid as another bold move in his long game.

What Happens Next

Cohen has signaled he is prepared to escalate if necessary, potentially launching a proxy fight or taking the offer directly to eBay shareholders. eBay’s board has shown no willingness to engage so far, but prolonged pressure could force negotiations or other defensive measures.

The situation remains fluid. Cohen’s next moves — whether aggressive pursuit or strategic retreat — will be closely watched by investors, corporate America and the meme-stock community that has followed his every step since the 2021 GameStop saga.

For now, the $56 billion bid has injected drama and volatility into both companies’ stocks, reminding the market that activist investors like Ryan Cohen can still create chaos even against much larger targets. Whether this ends in a transformative deal or another memorable chapter in Cohen’s unconventional career remains to be seen.

As the two sides dig in, the business world is left wondering if this is the beginning of a historic takeover battle or simply the latest bold but ultimately unsuccessful swing from one of retail investing’s most polarizing figures.

DETROIT — More than two decades after Tupac Shakur’s death and nearly 30 years into Eminem’s career, the question of who is the better rapper continues to spark passionate arguments among music fans, critics and hip-hop historians. In 2026, with streaming numbers, cultural impact and technical skill all part of the conversation, the Eminem vs Tupac debate remains as alive and divisive as ever.

Both artists transformed rap music in their eras. Tupac, the West Coast revolutionary killed in 1996 at age 25, became a voice for the marginalized and a global symbol of resistance. Eminem, the Detroit MC who exploded onto the scene in 1999, brought unparalleled technical skill, emotional vulnerability and commercial dominance to the genre. Deciding which one is “better” depends heavily on the criteria — lyrical complexity, cultural influence, emotional depth, commercial success or lasting legacy.

Lyrical Skill and Technical Ability

Eminem is widely regarded as one of the most technically gifted rappers ever. His multisyllabic rhymes, internal schemes, breath control and ability to switch flows mid-verse remain unmatched for many fans. Songs like “Rap God,” “Technical Difficulties” and tracks from “The Eminem Show” showcase a level of wordplay and speed that few artists have approached.

Tupac’s strength lay in raw emotion and storytelling. While not always the most technically complex, his delivery carried urgency and authenticity. Tracks like “Dear Mama,” “Changes” and “California Love” blended social commentary with personal vulnerability in ways that resonated deeply with listeners. Tupac’s ability to paint vivid pictures of street life, systemic injustice and personal struggle gave his music a poetic power that transcended technical rap metrics.

Critics often note that Eminem wins on pure skill while Tupac wins on soul and impact. “Eminem is a technician. Tupac was a revolutionary poet,” said hip-hop journalist and author Soren Baker. “They excelled in different areas, which is why the debate never dies.”

Cultural Impact and Legacy

Tupac’s influence extends far beyond music. He became a cultural icon whose words continue to inspire activism, art and social movements decades after his death. His image, quotes and music appear regularly in protests, films and academic studies. Tupac’s ability to articulate the pain and hope of marginalized communities gave him a lasting societal impact that few artists achieve.

Eminem shattered barriers as a white rapper in a Black genre, achieving unprecedented mainstream success while maintaining credibility in hip-hop circles. He brought rap to audiences that previously ignored the genre and influenced a generation of MCs with his confessional style and dark humor. Eminem’s commercial dominance — selling more than 220 million records worldwide — opened doors for countless artists.

Both have shaped modern rap in profound ways. Tupac’s storytelling and activism inspired Kendrick Lamar, J. Cole and countless conscious rappers. Eminem’s technical innovation and emotional honesty influenced artists like Joyner Lucas, NF and many underground MCs.

Commercial Success and Streaming Era

Eminem leads significantly in pure sales and streaming numbers. His catalog continues to generate hundreds of millions of streams annually, with tracks like “Lose Yourself,” “Stan” and “Till I Collapse” remaining staples in playlists and workouts. Tupac’s estate has also seen strong streaming performance, but Eminem’s active career and consistent releases give him an edge in modern metrics.

However, Tupac’s impact feels more timeless to many fans. His music still sounds urgent and relevant in 2026, while some of Eminem’s shock-value content from earlier albums has aged less gracefully for newer generations.

Expert and Fan Perspectives

Hip-hop legends remain split. Snoop Dogg has praised both artists but often highlights Tupac’s cultural significance. “Pac was a revolutionary,” Snoop said in a recent interview. “Marshall is a technician. Different beasts.”

Eminem has spoken respectfully about Tupac, naming him as one of his biggest influences and covering his songs in the past. In interviews, Eminem has acknowledged the debt he owes to Tupac and other 90s legends.

Fan debates on platforms like Reddit, X and YouTube remain heated. Polls frequently show Tupac winning among older fans who value storytelling and activism, while Eminem dominates among younger audiences who prioritize technical skill and wordplay.

The Subjectivity of “Better”

Ultimately, declaring one rapper definitively better than the other misses the point of artistic appreciation. Music resonates differently with each listener based on personal experiences, values and tastes. Tupac spoke to the pain of systemic oppression and street life. Eminem spoke to inner demons, addiction and working-class struggles.

Both artists used rap as therapy, protest and entertainment. Both pushed boundaries and faced criticism for their content. Both left permanent marks on hip-hop culture that continue to influence new generations.

In 2026, with hip-hop more global and diverse than ever, the Eminem vs Tupac debate serves as a celebration of the genre’s richness rather than a zero-sum competition. Their combined legacies have helped shape modern rap into the dominant cultural force it is today.

As new artists emerge and streaming numbers continue to climb, the conversation evolves but never fades. For many fans, the answer is simple: there is no single greatest rapper. There are only great rappers who moved us in different ways at different times.

Whether you prefer Tupac’s revolutionary fire or Eminem’s technical brilliance, both deserve recognition as all-time greats who expanded what rap could be. The debate itself keeps their music alive and relevant, ensuring new generations discover and argue over their catalogs for decades to come.

In the end, hip-hop wins whenever fans passionately discuss its legends. And in the case of Eminem and Tupac, that conversation remains as vibrant and entertaining as their music itself.