Connect with us
DAPA Banner

Business

Rolls-Royce shares rise as FTSE 100 stock recovers from Trump tariffs

Published

on

Business Live

The aerospace giant’s stock is a top riser on the blue-chip index after a previous slump

A general view of the Rolls Royce Inchinan factory

A general view of the Rolls Royce Inchinan factory

Shares in aerospace behemoth Rolls-Royce have rebounded towards an all-time high, following a slump triggered by US tariffs that sent the City giant’s stock plummeting.

Advertisement

The FTSE 100 titan saw its stock rise by 1.6 per cent to 1,250.50p on Tuesday morning, making it one of the leading risers on the blue-chip index.

The group, which has UK sites in Derby and Filton near Bristol and is valued at a colossal £105bn, has been lauded as one of the London stock market’s top performers after gaining over 100 per cent last year.

However, the company took a hit following the latest trade salvo from President Donald Trump, which imposed sweeping ten per cent tariffs across the US’ Nato allies for their staunch defence of Greenland.

Rolls-Royce’s stock price fell by around eight per cent, losing over 100p in the week that followed as tensions escalated over Greenland’s sovereignty. Trump announced his latest instance of a so-called ‘TACO’ Trade (Trump Always Chickens Out) on 22 January.

Advertisement

Despite this, Rolls-Royce shares experienced a modest dip again last week after announcing it had secured an order from Delta Air Lines for 62 new engines. Rolls-Royce’s Tuesday rally follows the firm reaching an all-time high of 1,305.00p in mid-January.

Last year, amidst Trump’s ‘Liberation Day’ tariff onslaught, the stock dropped to lows of 659.00 as exporters felt the pinch of the White House’s unpredictable trade policy, as reported by City AM.

Rolls-Royce shed approximately 19 per cent during the week Trump emerged in the White House gardens brandishing a sandwich board announcing sweeping tariffs on America’s trading partners.

Following Trump’s U-turn, the blue-chip stock resumed its upward trajectory, ending the year at 1,150.00p.

Advertisement

The company has now entered the top five most valuable firms on the London Stock Exchange and is hot on the heels of Unilever, which sits just ahead with a £108bn market capitalisation.

Last month, HSBC surpassed AstraZeneca to become the City market’s most valuable company.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

Business

MARA Stock Surges Nearly 5% to $10.02 as Bitcoin Miner Pushes AI Pivot Amid Debt Reduction

Published

on

UiPath

NEW YORK — Shares of MARA Holdings Inc. jumped Monday to $10.02, up 48 cents or 4.98%, as the Bitcoin mining company continued to draw trader interest following its aggressive balance sheet cleanup, strategic shift toward artificial intelligence infrastructure and ongoing volatility tied to cryptocurrency prices.

MARA Holdings, Inc
MARA Holdings, Inc

The Miami-based firm, formerly known as Marathon Digital Holdings, has been transforming from a pure-play Bitcoin miner into a broader digital energy and infrastructure player. Its latest moves include selling a significant portion of its Bitcoin treasury to retire convertible debt at a discount and forging partnerships aimed at repurposing mining sites for high-performance computing and AI data centers.

MARA’s stock has been highly volatile in 2026, trading in a 52-week range from about $6.66 to $23.45. Monday’s gain came on elevated volume as investors weighed the company’s reduced leverage against persistent challenges in its core mining operations and broader sector pressures.

On March 26, MARA announced it had sold 15,133 Bitcoin between March 4 and March 25 for approximately $1.1 billion. The company used the proceeds to fund the repurchase of roughly $1 billion in face value of its 0.00% convertible senior notes due in 2030 and 2031. The notes were bought back at a discount, allowing MARA to capture about $88 million in value while reducing potential future dilution from conversions.

CEO Fred Thiel described the transaction as a “strategic capital allocation move” designed to strengthen the balance sheet and position the company for long-term growth. After the sales, MARA held approximately 38,689 Bitcoin, down from 53,822 at the end of 2025. The company has signaled it may continue opportunistically monetizing Bitcoin holdings in 2026 to enhance liquidity and fund initiatives.

Advertisement

The debt reduction lowers outstanding convertible principal significantly, easing pressure on the equity base. Analysts noted the move as credit-positive, though some expressed concern that selling treasury Bitcoin signals a departure from the aggressive accumulation strategy that once defined the company.

MARA has also been pivoting toward AI and high-performance computing. In late February, the company announced a strategic partnership with Starwood Capital to develop, lease and market select U.S. Bitcoin mining data centers for hyperscale, enterprise and AI-capable infrastructure. The arrangement includes triggers for proceeding with development, such as securing leases with qualifying tenants, with a decision required within 24 months.

The pivot comes after MARA reported a massive $1.71 billion net loss for the fourth quarter of 2025, driven largely by impairment charges and unrealized losses on digital assets amid fluctuating Bitcoin prices. For the full year 2025, revenue rose to about $907 million from $656 million the prior year, but the company swung to a $1.31 billion net loss from prior profitability.

Bitcoin production in Q4 fell 19% year-over-year to 2,011 BTC, reflecting operational challenges including power constraints and efficiency efforts. Adjusted EBITDA turned negative, highlighting the impact of lower hash rates and higher costs in a competitive mining environment.

Advertisement

Despite the headline losses, shares rose sharply after the earnings release as investors focused on the AI infrastructure narrative and the Starwood deal. Management has emphasized that its energy assets and sites provide a foundation for diversification beyond mining, potentially generating stable leasing revenue from AI hyperscalers seeking power-hungry data centers.

Analyst reactions have been mixed. Cantor Fitzgerald maintained an Overweight rating but lowered its price target to $10 from $11 in early April. The consensus 12-month price target sits around $16.48, suggesting potential upside from current levels, though forecasts vary widely given the company’s sensitivity to Bitcoin prices and execution risks on the AI pivot.

MARA is scheduled to report first-quarter 2026 results around May 7. Wall Street expects continued focus on hash rate recovery, Bitcoin holdings updates, progress on the Starwood partnership and any further treasury transactions.

The company’s digital asset management strategy has included lending and pledging portions of its Bitcoin stack, generating interest income. At year-end 2025, about 28% of holdings were activated in such programs. While this provides yield, it also introduces counterparty and custody risks.

Advertisement

Broader market context has influenced MARA’s performance. Bitcoin prices have fluctuated in 2026 amid macroeconomic uncertainty, regulatory developments and institutional adoption trends. MARA’s valuation remains closely tied to crypto sentiment, even as it attempts to decouple through infrastructure diversification.

Insider activity has added to the narrative. In mid-March, CEO Fred Thiel sold 27,505 shares under a pre-arranged 10b5-1 trading plan at an average price of $9.18. Such sales are routine for executives but can sometimes weigh on sentiment in a volatile name.

MARA operates large-scale mining facilities across the United States, leveraging low-cost power agreements where possible. The company has highlighted improvements in energy efficiency and fleet upgrades, though production declines in recent quarters reflect industry-wide headwinds including the Bitcoin halving effects and rising competition.

The AI pivot introduces both opportunity and risk. Repurposing mining sites could generate higher-margin revenue from leasing, but it may divert power and resources from Bitcoin mining, potentially reducing output further. Operational disruptions during transitions could also pressure near-term results.

Advertisement

Critics argue MARA remains primarily a leveraged Bitcoin play, with its treasury and mining operations still dominating the story. Supporters point to the company’s substantial power capacity and site portfolio as undervalued assets in an era of surging AI demand for data center infrastructure.

As of mid-April 2026, MARA’s market capitalization hovers around $3.6 billion, with an enterprise value higher due to remaining debt. The stock carries a high beta, making it prone to sharp swings on crypto news, earnings or sector developments.

Looking ahead, key catalysts include Q1 production figures, updates on AI leasing progress, any additional Bitcoin sales or purchases, and macroeconomic factors affecting Bitcoin. Success in securing hyperscaler tenants for its data centers could mark a meaningful step in the strategic transformation.

Challenges persist, including regulatory scrutiny on crypto mining energy use, competition from larger players like Riot Platforms, and the inherent volatility of digital assets. Workforce reductions of about 15% announced earlier signal cost discipline amid the pivot.

Advertisement

MARA’s story reflects broader trends in the Bitcoin mining sector, where many operators are exploring diversification into AI, HPC or other energy-intensive applications to stabilize revenue. Whether the company can successfully execute this shift while managing its remaining Bitcoin exposure will determine if it can command a premium valuation beyond its crypto roots.

For now, with shares rebounding toward the $10 level on Monday and first-quarter earnings approaching, MARA remains one of the most actively traded names at the intersection of cryptocurrency, energy infrastructure and emerging AI data center demand. Investors continue to debate whether the balance sheet cleanup and AI ambitions provide a sustainable path forward or if the company will stay tethered to Bitcoin’s fortunes.

Continue Reading

Business

Trump says 34 ships passed through Hormuz strait after blockade comes into effect

Published

on


Trump says 34 ships passed through Hormuz strait after blockade comes into effect

Continue Reading

Business

LVMH Q1 2026 slides: organic growth holds amid currency headwinds

Published

on

LVMH Q1 2026 slides: organic growth holds amid currency headwinds


LVMH Q1 2026 slides: organic growth holds amid currency headwinds

Continue Reading

Business

The Magnum Ice Cream Co. adds candy bar-inspired desserts

Published

on

The Magnum Ice Cream Co. adds candy bar-inspired desserts

The offerings include Reese’s and Almond Joy-inspired products. 

Continue Reading

Business

Colombia to control hippo population through euthanasia

Published

on

Colombia to control hippo population through euthanasia


Colombia to control hippo population through euthanasia

Continue Reading

Business

‘They Did Some Stuff’ That Cost Him Shot at Third Green Jacket

Published

on

Tyler Shough

AUGUSTA, Ga. — World No. 1 Scottie Scheffler came agonizingly close to winning a third Masters green jacket Sunday but finished one shot short of Rory McIlroy, then pointedly suggested that decisions by Augusta National officials on course setup played a role in denying him the title.

Scottie Scheffler
Scottie Scheffler Blasts Masters Officials: ‘They Did Some Stuff’ That Cost Him Shot at Third Green Jacket

Scheffler, who entered the final round trailing by five shots after a career-best 7-under 65 on Saturday, carded a 4-under 68 on Sunday to finish at 11-under par for the tournament. McIlroy, seeking to become the first repeat champion since Tiger Woods in 2002, held on for a one-stroke victory at 12-under.⁠Usatoday

In post-round comments, the two-time Masters winner did not hide his frustration with how the course was prepared, particularly on Friday. Scheffler teed off early that day and posted a 2-over 74 — his first over-par round at Augusta National since 2023 — while later groups benefited from softer conditions that produced a “barrage of birdies.”

“I’m not in charge of course setup,” Scheffler told reporters. “I would’ve liked it to have been a little bit more equal in terms of the firmness on Thursday and Friday. I was a bit surprised at how soft things were on Friday afternoon, especially as it got late in the day. … Going out on Friday, whatever they did to the greens to soften them up, they did some stuff, and I just wasn’t able to take advantage of that going out early on Friday.”⁠Nypost

The comments, first reported by the New York Post and echoed across golf media, quickly sparked debate about whether Augusta National’s legendary attention to detail sometimes creates uneven playing conditions based on tee times and weather shifts. Scheffler opened with a 2-under 70 on Thursday afternoon in what he described as some of the week’s toughest conditions, with wind and firmer surfaces limiting scoring.

Advertisement

“Thursday afternoon were some of the most challenging conditions we had all week. I didn’t see many birdies out there Thursday afternoon,” he added. “Overall, on Friday, going out early and not being able to shoot an under-par round definitely hurt my chances. I’d say Friday probably hurt the most in terms of my chances of winning.”⁠Themirror

Scheffler’s second-round stumble included bogeys on the par-5 13th and 15th holes after finding water with approach shots. He had been on an remarkable streak of 11 consecutive rounds at par or better at the Masters before that 74. Despite the setback, he mounted a furious charge on moving day, firing a bogey-free 65 that included an eagle and moved him back into serious contention.

The 28-year-old Texan has now finished no worse than tied for 10th in his last several Masters appearances, with victories in 2022 and 2024. He has never finished outside the top 20 in seven starts at Augusta National, underscoring his remarkable consistency on one of golf’s most demanding stages.⁠Masters

McIlroy, who won his first Masters in 2025 to complete the career Grand Slam, praised Scheffler’s performance while acknowledging the razor-thin margin.

Advertisement

“Scottie is the best player in the world for a reason,” McIlroy said after his victory. “He played fantastic golf this week, especially coming back the way he did on Saturday and Sunday. One shot is golf — it’s what makes this game so brutal and so beautiful.”

Augusta National officials have long maintained tight control over course conditioning, famously adjusting pin placements, rough height and green speeds hour by hour based on weather forecasts. The club rarely comments publicly on setup decisions, and tradition discourages players from criticizing the course openly. Scheffler’s pointed remarks — delivered calmly but directly — stood out because of his typically measured demeanor.

Golf analysts were split on the fairness of the conditions. Some pointed out that variable weather is an inherent part of major championship golf, and that later tee times often benefit from knowledge of how the course is playing. Others noted that softening the greens significantly between Thursday and Friday could indeed create an advantage for afternoon waves, especially if wind died down or irrigation was increased.

Scheffler himself acknowledged the unpredictability of the elements.

Advertisement

“So who knows, it’s just that’s part of the game,” he said. “But it definitely hurt my chances.”⁠Sports.yahoo

The world No. 1 also drew attention earlier in the week for a testy exchange with a reporter after his third-round 65. When asked if the round could have been even better, Scheffler responded sharply: “That was a terrible question. Next question.” He later clarified that he felt he left a few shots on the course but was pleased with the execution needed to climb back into contention.⁠Sports.yahoo

Scheffler’s near-miss caps a strong start to 2026, during which he has already secured a victory and multiple top-four finishes. His ball-striking remains elite, and his short game recovery on the weekend demonstrated why many consider him the most complete player in the game.

For McIlroy, the repeat victory cements his place among the greats and provides redemption after years of near-misses at Augusta before his 2025 breakthrough. The Northern Irishman closed with steady play Sunday while Scheffler made birdies early before settling into a string of pars, then birdying the 15th and 16th too late to catch up.

Advertisement

The final-round drama played out under ideal spring conditions at Augusta National, with azaleas in bloom and massive galleries lining the fairways. Scheffler’s supporters cheered loudly on the back nine as he tried to mount a charge, but McIlroy’s experience and clutch putting held firm.

In the broader context of the 2026 Masters, the tournament once again delivered compelling storylines. McIlroy’s win marked the first successful defense since Woods two decades earlier. Scheffler’s comments, meanwhile, have ignited fresh discussion about equity in course setup — a topic that surfaces periodically when tee-time luck and weather interact with meticulous preparations.

Masters chairman Fred Ridley and the competition committees are known for their philosophy that the course should “defend itself” while rewarding precise shot-making. Whether Friday’s softening crossed into unfair territory remains subjective, but Scheffler’s status as the game’s dominant player gives his perspective significant weight.

Scheffler has historically avoided controversy, focusing instead on process and preparation. His willingness to speak candidly Sunday suggests the sting of finishing runner-up by the slimmest of margins after a week of uneven scoring opportunities.

Advertisement

Looking ahead, Scheffler is expected to remain the favorite in upcoming PGA Tour events as he pursues a third major title of his young career. His record at Augusta — two wins and consistent contention — ensures he will be among the top betting choices when the 2027 Masters rolls around.

For now, the golf world digests a thrilling 2026 edition that ended with McIlroy hoisting the green jacket once more while the game’s best player expressed genuine disappointment over decisions beyond his control.

“They did some stuff,” Scheffler said simply, capturing the essence of what he believes tipped the scales just enough to cost him another trip to Butler Cabin.

Whether those remarks spark any official response from Augusta National remains to be seen. In a tournament steeped in tradition and decorum, Scheffler’s blunt assessment has already become one of the most talked-about moments off the course.

Advertisement

As the players disperse and attention turns to the next major, one thing is clear: at the highest level of golf, even the smallest differences in conditions can separate champions from runners-up — and even the world No. 1 is not immune to feeling the impact.

Continue Reading

Business

GoodPop debuts sour frozen novelties

Published

on

GoodPop debuts sour frozen novelties

The fruit pops are available in four flavors. 

Continue Reading

Business

Advancing sports nutrition through ingredient innovation

Published

on

Advancing sports nutrition through ingredient innovation

Precision fermentation, casein and pea protein ingredients boost the category.

Continue Reading

Business

Wall Street puts streaming in focus. Its future is unclear

Published

on

Wall Street puts streaming in focus. Its future is unclear

In an aerial view, the Netflix logo is displayed above Netflix corporate offices on October 7, 2025 in Los Angeles, California.

Mario Tama | Getty Images

There’s a love affair on Wall Street between investors and streaming.

Advertisement

The romance started about a decade ago when consumers began cutting the cord with cable TV bundles en masse in favor of direct-to-consumer streaming apps. However, where investors were once enamored with subscriber growth, rewarding companies that were able to expand their consumer reach, their attentions have now shifted toward profitability.

To meet this new expectation, streaming companies have raised the prices of their services, cracked down on password sharing and delved into the ad-supported space. It’s also sparked the likes of Paramount Skydance to seek out the acquisition of Warner Bros. Discovery for its extensive library of content and top-tier streaming service, HBO Max, in order to compete.

While streaming continues to drive media stocks, especially around quarterly earnings, it’s not clear when — or if — it will start driving profits for the smaller players.

“Is streaming a good business?” Robert Fishman, senior research analyst at MoffettNathanson, posed in a March research note to investors. “We raised and debated this critical question over the years leading us to determine the answer is yes, albeit only for those services with sufficient scale.”

Advertisement

For legacy media companies, streaming has yet to fully supplant the profits and advertising revenue of linear TV. Of course, both of those metrics have been in decline for companies like WBD, Paramount and its peers.

In response, streamers have largely raised subscription prices for consumers, begging the question of where the ceiling is for streaming costs. Between higher fees and the sheer number of services needed in order to have access to all content, consumers are starting to balk.

Still, with these continuous linear TV declines, investors cling to streaming as a bright spot, especially for companies that have made it profitable. Disney has been among the steadiest of legacy media companies when it comes to a profitable streaming business, but Paramount and WBD have seen profitable quarters and Comcast’s Peacock is narrowing losses.

“With streaming no one’s reporting sub numbers anymore, because now it’s all about profitability,” Doug Creutz, senior research analyst at Cowen, told CNBC. “And that’s the metric by which these these businesses are being judged. It’s, you know, can you get to 10% operating profit? Can you get 15%? Can you get 20%? Can you get 25%? Can you get to where Netflix is?”

Advertisement

Netflix reported operating margin of 29.5% in 2025. Meanwhile, Disney, for example, guided investors to an operating margin for its direct-to-consumer business of 10% in fiscal 2026.

Workers prepare a large sign advertising a Disney movie while San Diego prepares to host thousands of visitors for Comic-Con International, in San Diego, California, on July 22, 2025.

Mike Blake | Reuters

“This is the big question mark that all these companies face,” Creutz added. “You had a linear business that was really profitable and it’s gone away, and is the streaming business ever going to be that profitable?”

Advertisement

‘No streamer comes close to Netflix’

The leader in the space is uncontested.

Netflix was early to the streaming game, scooping up a number of cord cutters with its significantly cheaper online alternative to pricey cable packages. The streaming giant has since grown its library through deals with Hollywood’s studios and by wading into original content.

Being among the first to the space meant a massive audience for Netflix. In January, the company announced it had reached 325 million global paid customers.

“As we think about global scale, the ability to spread the content spend and other fixed streaming costs over a much larger subscriber base leads to a more meaningful streaming profit opportunity,” Fishman wrote. “On that front, no streamer comes close to Netflix.”

Advertisement

In the eyes of Wall Street, Netflix is the gold standard. But competition for viewership is growing and now includes YouTube, TikTok, other social media as well as live events and gaming — all jockeying for consumers’ time.

And even the industry leader isn’t immune to the challenges of the streaming business.

In 2022 Netflix reported its first quarterly subscriber loss in more than a decade, dragging down its stock price. The media giant responded with a series of changes to its business model, most notably the addition of a cheaper, ad-supported tier.

Netflix no longer reports quarterly subscriber counts, and Disney has since followed suit as the industry refocuses on profits. (Disney also stopped breaking down the revenue and operating income for other parts of its entertainment business, including linear TV.)

Advertisement

But analysts agree that the comparison of Netflix to traditional media players isn’t exactly apples to apples. After all, Disney, Comcast, Warner Bros. and Paramount aren’t just streamers. These companies still have linear TV businesses as well as robust theatrical divisions. And some have other, even more lucrative pieces of their empires, including merchandising, theme parks, hotels and cruise lines.

The Paramount booth is shown on the convention floor during the opening day the of Comic-Con International in San Diego, California, U.S. July 24, 2025.

Mike Blake | Reuters

It’s only recently that Netflix has branched out from its content-only strategy to launch its own merchandising and live event businesses.

Advertisement

“They don’t have the decline of legacy media to offset,” Alicia Reese, senior vice president of equity research at Wedbush. “They don’t have theatrical to worry about.”

The result is traditional media companies that are often sized up against what a non-traditional tech company has been able to build in the streaming arena.

How much is too much?

Both Netflix and traditional media companies have raised prices for their streaming platforms over the last year in an effort to boost revenue and justify high content spending.

While consumers groan at the sight of these price increases and at being locked out of accounts they previously borrowed due to password sharing crackdowns, Wall Street applauds such measures.

Advertisement

“We think Netflix is positioning for substantial growth in global advertising, while its latest price increases could provide a meaningful boost to profitability this year,” Reese wrote in a research note published Friday.

Netflix will report its quarterly earnings on Thursday, weeks after announcing yet another a price increase across its subscription tiers, including its cheapest plan with ads.

“While Netflix has consistently raised pricing across tiers, our analysis suggests U.S. revenue per streaming hour is one of the lowest among its peers, suggesting further pricing runway going forward,” Matthew Condon, analyst at Citizens, wrote in a research note published last month.

The majority of streamers offer several plans, ranging from a cheaper ad-supported option to an ad-free standard service and then a higher-priced and higher-quality version.

Advertisement

To ease some price burden, streamers have also started to offer bundles of their services at a discount, further suggesting they could be finding customers’ limits.

The difference in pricing of the ad-supported and ad-free tiers varies from streamer to streamer, but typically an ad-supported service ranges from $7.99 a month to $12.99 a month and premium subscriptions range from $13.99 a month to $26.99 a month. These prices are often set based on how much content is available in a given library and how much that streamer is paying to produce and license content for its service.

“I think you’re going to continue to see price increases similar to what Netflix has been doing,” Creutz said. “We’re going to find out how sticky services are if price continues to go up.”

Streaming subscription plans

Advertisement

Netflix

  • Standard with ads: $8.99/month
  • Standard no ads: $19.99/month
  • Premium no ads: $26.99/month

(extra members cost $7.99/month for ads, $9.99/month for no ads)

Disney

  • Disney+/Hulu with ads: $12.99/month
  • Disney+/Hulu without ads: $19.99/month
  • Disney/Hulu/ESPN Unlimited with ads: $35.99/month
  • Disney/Hulu/ESPN Unlimited without ads: $44.99/month

Warner Bros. Discovery

  • HBO Max with ads: $10.99/month
  • HBO Max standard: $18.49/month
  • HBO Max premium: $22.99/month

Paramount

  • Paramount+ with ads: $8.99/month
  • Paramount+ premium without ads: $13.99/month

Comcast

  • Peacock with ads: $7.99/month
  • Peacock premium with ads: $10.99/month
  • Peacock premium plus without ads: $16.99/month

Apple

Amazon

  • Prime Video included in Prime shipping subscription
  • Ad-free for an additional $4.99/month

Ads or no ads? That’s the question.

Advertising has long been part of the TV business model. Even as cable TV bundle prices soared before the advent of streaming, advertising provided a cushion.

However, for streaming, the push for consumers to opt into ad-supported plans has more recently ramped up across the ecosystem.

Advertisement

Netflix, which had long resisted ads, introduced its ad-tier in November 2022 and shortly after eliminated its cheapest basic plan, pushing customers toward watching with commercials.

Former Disney CEO Bob Iger said in prior investor calls that his company is trying to steer customers toward ad-supported plans. And by 2023’s Upfront presentation, the industry’s annual pitch to advertisers, streaming took center stage.

The economics bear out: Netflix reported 2025 ad revenue exceeded $1.5 billion, or about 3% of total full-year revenue. That’s expected to double this year.

“We’re making good progress, and the opportunity ahead of us is massive,” Netflix Co-CEO Greg Peters said during the company’s earnings call in January.

Advertisement

Greg Peters, Co-CEO of Netflix, speaks at a keynote on the future of entertainment at Mobile World Congress 2023.

Joan Cros | Nurphoto | Getty Images

In post-earnings notes after that report, analysts agreed that while Netflix’s ad revenue growth was slow to start, having more insight from the company helped understand how it’s incorporated into the business.

While legacy media peers were late to the streaming game by comparison, they were often faster than Netflix to institute ad plans. Disney’s Hulu, Paramount+ and Peacock offered these options from their inception. HBO Max launched its ads plan in 2021, while Disney+ joined Netflix in late 2022.

Advertisement

That could help speed up the on ramp to meaningful streaming profits.

In general, though, the advertising landscape has been tricky to measure for media companies. Linear TV ad revenue have been on a precipitous decline in recent years. Tech companies like Google and Meta’s Facebook continue to gobble up the lion’s share of ad dollars. And while streaming has been a key source of ad revenue growth for media companies, it has yet to stack up to what traditional TV once garnered.

Choose CNBC as your preferred source on Google and never miss a moment from the most trusted name in business news.
Continue Reading

Business

Taxis, farmers and the fuel crisis in the south

Published

on

Taxis, farmers and the fuel crisis in the south

Drivers in the south of England are feeling the financial strain from the US-Israel war with Iran.

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2025