Elton Reservoir, Walshaw and Simister Bowlee plans also feature school, local centres and roads
Political bosses have signed off on three masterplans that will see thousands of new homes built in Bury’s countryside.
The documents shape the council’s vision, hopes and ambitions for three huge developments. The schemes, at Elton Reservoir, Walshaw and Simister Bowlee, will see swathes of fields concreted over for around 6,300 new homes.
There could also be three new primary schools, five local centres, a new Metrolink tram stop and two major new roads. The three plans cover 406 hectares of land.
The principle of the developments were approved through the Greater Manchester Places for Everyone allocations which was adopted in the region following examination by the Government’s planning inspectorate.
Leader of Bury council Eamonn O’Brien argued at last week’s cabinet meeting that the masterplans were a way of increasing the Town Hall’s control over those developments, saying that, without them, there is a risk of applications coming forwards ‘below’ council ‘expectations’. The documents will act as guiding principles for the scheme, setting out expectations such as new infrastructure, environmental mitigation and housing provision.
He told elected members: “Ultimately, it’s about trying to win those arguments for if these things are not delivered. We then have the democratic right and power to push back on that and reject those.
“I view these as positive frameworks. I think they are about ensuring places come forward properly with consideration of residents, traffic, flooding, biodiversity. That doesn’t mean we can have no impact on anyone anywhere, but it is about […] delivering alongside it the best possible suite of infrastructure.”
However, not everyone attending the meeting was convinced. One heckler in the public gallery could be heard shouting ‘traitors’ as councillors voted to adopt the masterplans. She had earlier accused elected members of backing the plans in a bid to ensure development ‘does not encroach on their wards’.
The woman said: “If it’s on our doorsteps, it’s fine. The minute it’s on councillors’ doorsteps, they don’t want it.”
Criticism was also expressed by the leader of the authority’s Conservative Group, Shahbaz Arif, who said: “The Conservative Group has always believed that our greenbelt should be protected […] Once greenbelt has been built on, it is gone forever.
“We have listened to local residents and we share their concerns about the impact on traffic, local services and the loss of our greenspace.”
Labour councillor Charlotte Morris said she had argued against Walshaw site being included in the Places For Everyone policy. She added: “We do have to be pragmatic in these scenarios.
“A plan is better than no plan […] My plea, my challenge, my point is that we all need to hold developers’ feet to the fire on this. If we agree [the plans] tonight, we’re saying ‘we back this because a plan is better than no plan’ and we want to see that plan delivered with the infrastructure that’s going to support this development in our communities.”
Planning permission will need to be granted at each site before any development can take place. These will need to prove the scheme will not have unacceptable impacts, including on nature, existing and future residents, local services and the local road networks.
To find all the planning applications, traffic diversions, road layout changes, alcohol licence applications and more in your community, visit the Public Notices Portal.





You must be logged in to post a comment Login