Connect with us

Business

What It Means for UK Business & Investors

Published

on

What It Means for UK Business & Investors

Andy Burnham, the front-runner to succeed Sir Keir Starmer as prime minister, has spent years making a single argument with unusual consistency: that Britain taxes work too heavily and wealth too lightly.

After his Makerfield by-election victory and Starmer’s resignation, that argument has stopped being a talking point on the fringes of his party and become a question the City, the boardroom and the family business are all now being forced to answer.

The shift carries “considerable consequences for households, businesses, investors and the economy,” warns Nigel Green, chief executive of deVere Group, one of the world’s largest independent financial advisory organisations. His intervention lands as investors increasingly weigh what a Burnham government could mean for taxation, investment, property, wealth creation and Britain’s competitiveness, at a moment when global capital has more choice than at any point in living memory.

Burnham has long held that the country leans too hard on taxing earnings, while accumulated wealth, assets and property should shoulder a greater share. As he moves closer to Downing Street, those instincts are migrating from the political margins to the centre of the economic debate. The unease is already measurable: Business Matters has reported that eight in ten SME owners fear what an Andy Burnham premiership would mean for their business.

“Andy Burnham’s seemingly unstoppable ascent to the top of British politics marks one of the most significant moments for investors in years,” Green says. “For the first time in a generation, Britain could soon have a prime minister whose political instinct is to look at wealth and ask whether it should be paying more. This matters because the answer doesn’t just affect the wealthy. It affects investment, jobs, business formation and economic growth.”

Advertisement

Burnham has not proposed a wealth tax, an exit tax or any specific package aimed at private wealth. Yet investors are already training their attention on the areas most exposed if a future government tried to tilt the burden away from earnings and towards assets.

“Capital gains tax, inheritance tax, property taxation, investment income and larger estates are all featuring more prominently in discussions taking place across financial markets,” Green notes. “The prospect of a government placing greater emphasis on the taxation of wealth is already triggering discussions among investors, entrepreneurs and business owners about the future direction of policy.”

The questions extend to council tax, stamp duty and land taxation. Burnham has previously backed property tax reform and has been linked to calls to replace the current council tax system with approaches tied more closely to underlying land values. Whether those ideas survive contact with the Treasury is another matter, and as Business Matters has explored, the case for whether Burnham can win over Britain’s entrepreneurs is far from settled.

He inherits a difficult backdrop: weak growth, stretched public finances and mounting spending pressure. Public sector debt sits close to the size of the entire economy, while the bills for healthcare, pensions, infrastructure and defence keep climbing. Against that, any government faces hard choices about where to find revenue without choking off growth, a tension already visible in reports that the Treasury is weighing inheritance and capital gains tax reforms to plug a budget gap.

Advertisement

“Governments are right to pursue fairness,” Green says. “But fairness and competitiveness must coexist. The danger is that Britain drifts into a mindset where wealth creation becomes viewed with suspicion rather than encouragement.”

Britain remains one of the world’s leading destinations for investment, underpinned by deep capital markets, strong institutions, legal certainty and London’s standing as a global financial centre. But the competition has sharpened. Financial centres across Europe, the Middle East and Asia are actively courting entrepreneurs, investors and internationally mobile families.

“Investors around the world are watching Britain and asking a simple question: is this a country becoming more attractive to capital or less,” Green says. “The answer will determine where money flows next.”

The implications reach well beyond headline rates. Family business succession, property ownership structures, pension arrangements, investment portfolios and estate planning could all face greater scrutiny if future governments decide wealth should contribute a larger share of receipts.

Advertisement

“Britain already taxes capital gains. It already taxes inheritance. It already taxes property. It already taxes investment income,” Green observes. “The question is now whether a Burnham government would push further. And that’s precisely why investors are paying such close attention.”

The numbers explain the stakes. According to the Office for National Statistics, privately owned wealth in Great Britain stands at roughly £13.6 trillion, more than six times annual national income, with property, pensions and financial assets making up the overwhelming majority. That wealth is also highly concentrated: House of Commons Library analysis shows the wealthiest tenth of households hold around 41 per cent of the total, a concentration that fuels the argument that assets should do more of the fiscal heavy lifting.

For households, the consequences would stretch far past the ultra-wealthy. Changes to inheritance tax reshape family succession. Reforms to property taxation touch homeowners and landlords. Adjustments to capital gains alter the economics of investing and entrepreneurship. Pension tax relief and investment income could also be drawn in if policymakers hunt for revenue while shielding taxes on work.

“There’s a growing belief inside parts of politics that wealth represents an easy answer to difficult fiscal questions,” Green says. “History teaches us it’s rarely that simple. The more aggressively governments pursue existing wealth, the greater the risk they discourage future wealth creation.”

Advertisement

His core worry is the direction of travel. “Businesses invest for years ahead. Investors allocate capital for decades ahead. If they conclude Britain is becoming less welcoming to enterprise, they’ll adjust accordingly. A generation ago, wealth was relatively captive. Today it is very much mobile. It compares jurisdictions, tax systems and governments. And it moves.”

As momentum builds behind Burnham, Green frames the moment as a defining economic test. “Andy Burnham believes wealth should carry more of the burden. It’s a belief that has taken him a long way in politics. Now investors are asking what happens if it starts shaping government.”

“There’s a world of difference between saying wealth should pay more and designing policies that achieve it without damaging investment, entrepreneurship and growth,” he concludes. “That is the challenge waiting on the desk of any future prime minister Burnham. He is forcing a national conversation about who should pay more, work or wealth. Investors are asking whether Britain will end up paying the price.”


Amy Ingham

Amy is a newly qualified journalist specialising in business journalism at Business Matters with responsibility for news content for what is now the UK’s largest print and online source of current business news.

Advertisement

Continue Reading
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

Business

ASX 200 Closes Week 2.5% Higher Near Five-Month High as Wall Street Tech Rally Lifts Sentiment Friday

Published

on

Australia Housing Market 2026: Two-Speed Boom Persists as Prices Hit

Australia’s benchmark stock index closed narrowly higher Friday, capping a strong week that pushed the S&P/ASX 200 close to a five-month high, as easing domestic inflation and a powerful overnight rally in U.S. technology stocks helped offset a pullback from the session’s earlier highs.

The S&P/ASX 200 finished up 0.10%, adding 9.3 points to close at 8,977.0, trading well below its intraday high after touching gains of as much as 1.03% earlier in the session. The pullback was most pronounced in the materials sector, which surged as much as 3.13% in early trade before easing back to close up 1.49%, part of a pattern of outsized daily swings that has characterized mining and resources stocks over the past eight trading sessions, according to analysis from Marketindex.com.au’s Kerry Sun. Despite the late-session fade, the ASX 200 closed the week 2.5% higher and trading close to a five-month high.

The rally traced its roots to a powerful overnight session on Wall Street. Major U.S. benchmarks pushed higher through the session and finished near their best levels, with the technology-heavy Nasdaq Composite jumping 2.7% to snap a six-day losing streak as investors returned to the artificial intelligence trade that has driven much of the market’s gains over the past year. The S&P 500 climbed 1.66% and the Dow Jones Industrial Average added 1.19% in the same session. Microsoft was the standout performer, surging more than 15% and adding roughly $450 billion in market capitalization in a single day, a record one-day gain in dollar value for any publicly traded company. Chipmakers broadly participated in the rebound as well, with the Philadelphia Semiconductor Index gaining 8%.

The overnight strength on Wall Street flowed directly into Australian trading. Futures markets had pointed to a sharply higher open in Sydney, with September SPI futures settling up 77 points, or 0.86%, at 9,012.5 ahead of the local session, after the ASX 200 had ended Thursday’s session 0.78% lower at 8,967.7 points, snapping what had been a winning streak for the index.

Advertisement

Domestic economic data released earlier in the week also contributed to the positive tone across Australian markets. A cooler-than-expected consumer price index reading published Wednesday eased some investor concerns about the pace of future interest rate moves from the Reserve Bank of Australia, adding to a generally constructive backdrop for equities heading into the week’s close.

Commodity markets showed a mixed picture that shaped individual sector performance within the index. Gold prices climbed sharply overnight, with futures rising 1.65% to $4,102.30 an ounce, a move that boosted sentiment toward gold miners including Evolution Mining and Newmont Corporation heading into Friday’s session. Iron ore prices also firmed, aided in part by strike threats affecting BHP Group’s operations, even as underlying demand signals out of China remained comparatively weak. Oil prices moved in the opposite direction, with Brent crude falling 16% since July 23 and closing down 1.88% at $89.03 a barrel in the most recent session, while U.S. crude dropped 1.03% to $83.59, a decline that weighed on energy-focused stocks including Santos and Woodside Energy Group even as both companies have continued to draw some support from concerns about ongoing Middle East shipping risks.

Lithium stocks drew renewed analyst attention during the week following quarterly production updates. Brokerage Bell Potter maintained its speculative buy rating on Vulcan Energy Resources while trimming its price target to $4.50 from $6.10, and held its hold rating on Pilbara Minerals while cutting its target to $4.70 from $6.15. Commenting on Pilbara Minerals specifically, Bell Potter said the company “will generate substantial earnings and cash flow with the restart of the 200ktpa Ngungaju processing plant” at current lithium market prices, while noting that its P2000 and Colina development studies “are being progressed, providing substantial organic growth optionality in markets with strong underlying EV and BESS-led long term demand fundamentals.”

Longer-term bond yields presented a potential headwind for growth-oriented stocks heading into the new trading week. The U.S. 30-year Treasury yield reached its highest level in 19 years during the week, a development that analysts said could constrain further gains in growth-sensitive sectors of the market if the trend continues, even as the immediate market reaction to this week’s data and earnings news remained broadly positive.

Advertisement

With the ASX 200 now trading above levels implied by at least two previously stated year-end forecasts from market strategists, analysts have begun flagging a more complex outlook heading into the second half of the year, noting that earnings expectations for sectors outside of mining and banking have started to tighten even as those two dominant sectors have continued to anchor the index’s overall performance. Wood Mackenzie separately forecast that continued turbulence in Middle East oil markets could help lift global upstream oil and gas free cash flow to $495 billion in 2026, provided Brent crude prices average around $90 per barrel over the course of the year, underscoring how closely tied energy sector earnings outlooks remain to the trajectory of the ongoing geopolitical situation.

With a busy stretch of corporate earnings and economic data still ahead, investors are likely to watch closely whether the current wave of positive momentum from U.S. technology stocks can be sustained into the new trading week, particularly as questions persist about bond yield pressure, energy price volatility and the durability of the artificial intelligence-driven rally that powered Thursday night’s rebound on Wall Street.

Continue Reading

Business

Cornwall Airport Newquay could reintroduce passenger levy to help cover running costs

Published

on

Business Live

The cash-strapped transport hub continues to struggle financially

A plane taking off in a sunset

A plane taking off(Image: Steve Parsons/PA Wire)

The prospect of Newquay Airport ever becoming financially self-sufficient without the backing of Cornish taxpayers remains a distant reality. That was the stark message delivered at Cornwall Council meetings this week.

Advertisement

Having agreed to prop up the airport’s operations to the tune of more than £5.8m over the coming year, Cornwall councillors have been exploring the possibility of reintroducing a passenger levy to boost income.

Newquay Airport previously operated a levy known as the Airport Development Fee (ADF), a £5 charge applied to departing passengers aged 16 and over. Cornwall Council officially axed the contentious charge a decade later in March 2016 in a bid to drive passenger growth and attract new airline routes.

Meetings of Cornwall Council’s corporate finance scrutiny committee and its Liberal Democrat/Independent cabinet heard this week that the airport – which has perpetually struggled to turn a profit – is facing mounting pressure following the collapse of Eastern Airways and the council’s decision to scrap the subsidised Public Service Obligation (PSO) route to London Gatwick earlier this year.

In response, Corserv – the council-owned company that operates the airport – is set to unveil a transformation plan later this year. Alongside the commercial development of the surrounding airport estate, this could involve introducing alternative revenue streams such as drone operations, defence contracts and an expanded offering at Spaceport Cornwall, which is situated at the airport.

Advertisement

Corserv chief executive Neil Edmond told the finance scrutiny committee this week the airport requires more than a million passengers a year to cover its operating costs – a figure that will realistically never be achieved given its geographical location.

The committee was informed that the airport will be unable to function without financial support for at least the next four to five years, although it was hoped this reliance on subsidy could be reduced over time.

Cllr Rowland O’Connor voiced concerns that every single day the airport remains operational it is heaping further financial pressure on other areas of the council. He also highlighted the suspension of capital maintenance at the airport, which has been deferred for a year.

“It is absolutely amazing that we are deferring routine maintenance. From an outsider in, I’d be asking what safety implications does that have,” he said.

Advertisement

As part of its recommendations to cabinet, the committee called on the administration to “urgently reviews an airport passenger fee to maximise income”.

Council leader Cllr Leigh Frost confirmed it was something his cabinet would “absolutely look at”.

Cllr Martyn Alvey urged restraint, noting that the previous Conservative administration – of which he was a member – had considered reintroducing a passenger levy but “kicked it into touch” after concluding it was not a viable option.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Business

Fuchs confirms second quarter results with strong sales growth

Published

on


Fuchs confirms second quarter results with strong sales growth

Continue Reading

Business

NV Bekaert SA (BEKAY) Q2 2026 Earnings Call Transcript

Published

on

OneWater Marine Inc. (ONEW) Q1 2026 Earnings Call Transcript