Connect with us
DAPA Banner
DAPA Coin
DAPA
COIN PAYMENT ASSET
PRIVACY · BLOCKDAG · HOMOMORPHIC ENCRYPTION · RUST
ElGamal Encrypted MINE DAPA
🚫 GENESIS SOLD OUT
DAPAPAY COMING

Business

Why people sleep with phones next to bed? Psychology and sociology studies say it’s not because of any addiction or love for gadgets

Published

on

Why people sleep with phones next to bed? Psychology and sociology studies say it's not because of any addiction or love for gadgets
Picture the average American bedroom at night: a phone charging on the nightstand, glowing softly within arm’s reach of the pillow. According to a 2023 survey from the American Academy of Sleep Medicine, 87% of adults regularly sleep with their phone in the bedroom. YouGov polling shows that for many Americans, the smartphone is the last thing they see before sleep and the first thing they reach for upon waking. And a 2026 survey from mattress company Amerisleep found that Americans now spend an average of 38 minutes scrolling in bed before sleep, adding up to roughly 231 lost hours of sleep a year, nearly ten full days.

Also Read: 101-year-old working woman, who lives alone in New York, shares 3 tips to live longer, healthier, and happier, and none is about fitness

The instinctive explanation is that people are “addicted” to their phones, or simply can’t bear to be apart from a device they love. But when psychologists and sociologists have actually sat down with people and asked why they do it, the answers turn out to be far more layered, and far less about gadget infatuation than most of us assume.

The phone as a night-time companion, not a compulsion

One of the most detailed studies on this subject comes from sociologist Dana Zarhin, who interviewed dozens of adults and analyzed their sleep diaries in depth. She found that people weave their phones into the bedtime routine for reasons that are practical and social rather than compulsive. Many use it as an alarm clock. Others keep it close so they remain reachable for family members, aging parents, or work emergencies through the night. Some check messages one last time to feel that their social obligations for the day are complete before they allow themselves to switch off.

Advertisement

Zarhin coined a term for this pattern: “sleepful sociality”, a way of describing how the phone lets people stay socially connected even as they drift toward sleep, without necessarily disrupting the sleep itself. In many of the accounts she gathered, the phone wasn’t a distraction pulling people away from rest; it was a tool people used to manage the handover between their waking responsibilities and the act of sleeping.

A digital security blanket

There’s also a psychological explanation that has nothing to do with entertainment or scrolling. Researchers studying attachment theory, the same framework used to explain why toddlers cling to a favorite blanket or soft toy, have found that adults form comparable bonds with their smartphones. A widely cited study out of the Wharton School even labeled this the “Adult Pacifier Hypothesis,” showing that people experience genuine comfort and faster recovery from stress simply by having their phone nearby, in much the same way a child is soothed by a familiar object.
Also Read: Fatty liver new treatment found: Study discovers a medicine that reverses severe fatty liver by just repairing the gut
Later research building on this idea has shown that people who see their smartphone as a kind of “safe base”, something that makes them feel secure rather than merely entertained, are more likely to keep it close during vulnerable moments, and few moments are more vulnerable than the transition into sleep, when the mind is unguarded and thoughts tend to wander. Seen this way, keeping the phone on the pillow isn’t fundamentally different from earlier generations keeping a transistor radio, a landline, or a family photograph within reach at night.

The quiet pull of staying updated

A third strand of research points to something closer to social vigilance than addiction. A study of nearly 500 college students, published in the journal OBM Neurobiology, examined how bedtime smartphone habits related to Fear of Missing Out (FOMO) and general anxiety levels. It found that people with higher trait anxiety and stronger FOMO tended to use their phones more in the sleep environment, not because they were fixated on the device itself, but because the phone offered a way to manage the discomfort of not knowing what they might be missing, whether that was a message, breaking news, or simply what friends were doing. AASM’s own 2025-2026 polling backs this up on a national scale: over a third of U.S. adults say reading the news on their phone before bed, or “doomscrolling,” actively makes their sleep worse, with adults under 35 the most affected. For many, scrolling before sleep functions as a way to quiet racing thoughts, even if it sometimes backfires by keeping the mind more alert than intended.

Where the addiction story does hold some truth

None of this means concern about excessive phone use is misplaced. A large body of research on “nomophobia“, literally, the fear of being without a mobile phone, tells a more cautionary story, particularly among college students. As of 2024, roughly 91% of U.S. adults own a smartphone, a figure that climbs to 98% among those aged 18 to 29, and researchers have found nomophobia to be especially common in this age group, where it’s been linked to anxiety, physical health symptoms, and difficulty tolerating uncertainty.

Advertisement

Separately, a JAMA Network Open study published in March 2025 that tracked screen use among adults across the U.S. found that people who used screens before bed had a 33% higher rate of poor sleep quality and slept roughly 50 minutes less per week than those who avoided screens at night.

So the honest picture sits somewhere in between. For a large number of people, keeping the phone by the bed is a rational, low-stakes habit rooted in convenience, connection, and comfort, not so different from wanting a glass of water within reach. For a smaller but significant group, especially younger users, the pattern shades into something closer to genuine dependency, where the phone’s presence is driven more by anxiety than by choice.

What the research firmly does not support is the blanket assumption that reaching for your phone at bedtime says something troubling about your character, willpower, or mental health. It says more about the roles the phone has come to play, as alarm clock, lifeline to family, stress reliever, and social anchor, all rolled into one small rectangle of glass.

What this means for your own sleep

Understanding the “why” doesn’t erase the “what happens next”, screen light and late-night scrolling are still linked to delayed sleep onset and poorer sleep quality across nearly every study on the subject. But experts suggest the fix isn’t guilt or willpower alone. The AASM’s own recommendations focus on substitution rather than deprivation: leave the phone in another room and rely on a standard alarm clock, start a low-tech wind-down routine like reading or journaling, and turn off notifications so the device stops pulling at your attention even when you’re not reaching for it.

Advertisement

It helps to notice which specific need the phone is meeting for you, the alarm function, the fear of missing an emergency call, or simply the comfort of having something familiar nearby, and to find a substitute for that specific need, rather than trying to quit the habit cold turkey. Small, targeted changes tend to work far better than blanket bans, precisely because the habit was never really about the gadget in the first place.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

Business

H.B. Fuller declares quarterly dividend of $0.245 per share

Published

on


H.B. Fuller declares quarterly dividend of $0.245 per share

Continue Reading

Business

AMD: The CPU King

Published

on

AMD: The CPU King

AMD: The CPU King

Continue Reading

Business

General Mills in bromate crosshairs

Published

on

General Mills in bromate crosshairs

Florida issues civil subpoena for more information on use.

Continue Reading

Business

Trump’s CFPB overhaul cost Americans $26.5 billion, Sen. Warren says

Published

on

Trump's CFPB overhaul cost Americans $26.5 billion, Sen. Warren says

President Donald Trump (L) and Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-MA).

Reuters | Getty Images

Sen. Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass., said Thursday that the Trump administration’s overhaul of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau has cost Americans up to $26.5 billion so far, the latest Democratic critique of sweeping changes made to the agency.

Advertisement

In a report shared first with CNBC, Warren said most of that figure comes from moves the CFPB has taken under acting director Russell Vought to roll back rules capping credit card and overdraft fees.

The report comes as Vought faces a Senate oversight hearing Thursday on those and other actions, including dismissing enforcement actions and consent orders and an allegation that the agency recently removed 15 years of consumer data from the CFPB website.

Since taking office last year, the Trump administration has slashed staffing, dropped or narrowed dozens of enforcement cases, and rolled back Biden-era rules to refocus the agency on what officials call its core mission.

Republicans have defended the moves as necessary to rein in what they view as an overreaching regulator. Democrats led by Warren — who conceived and helped set up the agency after the 2008 financial crisis — have argued that the Trump administration has crippled a key consumer financial watchdog and exposed Americans to unfair or deceptive industry practices.

Advertisement

The clash comes as the Senate weighs the nomination of Brian Johnson, a former CFPB deputy director turned Capital One executive, whom President Donald Trump tapped to lead the agency permanently.

Warren’s report attributes up to $15 billion in consumer costs to the CFPB’s decision to abandon a rule capping most credit-card late fees at $8, a regulation the agency previously estimated would save consumers roughly $10 billion annually.

It attributes another $7.5 billion to the repeal of the CFPB’s overdraft fee rule, which would have limited many banks to charging $5 for overdrafts.

The remainder of the estimate comes from the CFPB’s decision to drop more than three dozen enforcement actions and settlements, some of which were set to send payments directly to consumers. That totaled roughly $4 billion, according to the report.

Advertisement

The White House and CFPB did not immediately respond to requests for comment.

Ahead of Thursday’s hearing, Warren also sent Vought a letter cataloging what she described as unanswered congressional oversight requests during his tenure running the bureau.

Choose CNBC as your preferred source on Google and never miss a moment from the most trusted name in business news.
Continue Reading

Business

ADM joins General Mills and Walmart in regen ag effort

Published

on

ADM joins General Mills and Walmart in regen ag effort

Trio targets 40,000 wheat acres.

Continue Reading

Business

Greece stocks lower at close of trade; Athens General Composite down 0.40%

Published

on


Greece stocks lower at close of trade; Athens General Composite down 0.40%

Continue Reading

Business

Osterweis Capital Management Q3 2026 Strategic Income Outlook

Published

on

Osterweis Capital Management Q3 2026 Strategic Income Outlook

Osterweis Capital Management was founded in 1983 to serve the portfolio management needs of high net worth individuals and institutions. We believe the best way to protect and grow assets is through carefully selected, high conviction portfolios that are designed to capture upside in favorable markets and limit downside during selloffs. We manage equities and fixed income, which are available through mutual funds and separate accounts. Note: This account is not managed or monitored by Osterweis Capital Management, and any messages sent via Seeking Alpha will not receive a response. For inquiries or communication, please use the firm’s official channels. Mutual fund investing involves risk. Principal loss is possible. Distributed by Quasar Distributors, LLC.

Continue Reading

Business

Walmart: The Sell-Off Isn't Over Yet (Rating Upgrade)

Published

on

Palantir: AI SaaS Winner Still Expensive - Bull Trap Plays Out

Walmart: The Sell-Off Isn't Over Yet (Rating Upgrade)

Continue Reading

Business

TSMC Q2: The AI Panic Creates Your Second Chance

Published

on

TSMC Q2: The AI Panic Creates Your Second Chance

TSMC Q2: The AI Panic Creates Your Second Chance

Continue Reading

Business

Wessex Water to be charged over blast that killed four workers

Published

on

Business Live

The Health and Safety Executive has informed the utilities firm of its plan to prosecute

Wessex Water is set to face criminal charges nearly six years after a tragedy that killed four workers at its Avonmouth treatment site near Bristol.

The Health and Safety Executive (HSE) is to prosecute the water company over the deaths of Luke Wheaton, 16, Ray White, 57, Brian Vickery, 63, and Mike James, 64, who died in December 2020.

The four workers, one of whom was an apprentice, were carrying out welding on the roof of an anaerobic digester silo and a spark ignited the gas inside.

Advertisement

Avon & Somerset police initially led a criminal investigation into the blast, but it was dropped in July 2024 because they said at the time the evidence they had gathered did “not reach the extremely high threshold to prosecute” anyone at Wessex Water, or the company itself, for corporate manslaughter.

The HSE took over the investigation and has now confirmed it will be bringing charges against Wessex Water in relation to the explosion.

A spokesperson for the HSE confirmed charges would be brought.

“Following an investigation by the Health and Safety Executive into an incident at Avonmouth on 3 December 2020, which resulted in the deaths of four workers, our Legal Services Division has taken the decision to authorise criminal charges against Wessex Water, for offences under the Health and Safety at Work etc. Act,” a spokesperson said.

Advertisement

Wessex Water, a company owned by Malaysian firm YTL, confirmed it had been told the firm would be charged.

A Wessex Water spokesperson said: “The HSE has informed us of its decision to prosecute. We will always remember Brian Vickery, Ray White, Luke Wheaton and Mike James. Our thoughts are with their families, friends and colleagues.”

In the aftermath of the blast, the grieving families of the four who died paid tribute to their loved ones, asked for respect for their privacy and have made no further comments publicly about the ongoing investigation.

Instead, many of the relatives have got involved in fundraising and other projects to honour their loved ones and create a lasting legacy for them.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2025