Connect with us

Crypto World

Binance Files Lawsuit Against RedotPay Over Alleged $473M Losses

Published

on

Crypto Breaking News

Binance-linked entities have filed a lawsuit in Hong Kong alleging that RedotPay, a Hong Kong-based cryptocurrency payments firm, diverted more than 470,000 users away from the Binance Card through activities they say were outside a commercial agreement. The plaintiffs are seeking nearly $473 million in damages.

The case, detailed in a Hong Kong court filing obtained by Bloomberg, is part of a broader push by Binance-affiliated companies to enforce terms tied to their card offering. Bloomberg reported the litigation may also intersect with RedotPay’s plans as it weighs a potential initial public offering.

Key takeaways

  • Binance-affiliated plaintiffs say RedotPay enabled users to load RedotPay payment cards using Binance Pay outside the scope of their agreement.
  • The complaint alleges diversion of more than 470,000 users from Binance Card and seeks about $472.8 million in damages.
  • RedotPay says the lawsuit will not affect operations and plans to contest the claims.
  • A related legal action is also underway in Singapore, where a hearing has been scheduled for Friday.

Hong Kong lawsuit targets alleged diversion of Binance Card users

According to Bloomberg’s report, Binance Holdings affiliates Nest Trading, DistributedTechnologies and Chaintecs Consulting Singapore filed the petition against RedotPay co-founders Gao Zhangpeng, Chan Wa Choi and Yao Chao. The filing centers on alleged breach of a commercial agreement governing RedotPay’s relationship with Binance Card.

The plaintiffs’ core allegation is that RedotPay permitted users to fund RedotPay stablecoin payment cards with Binance Pay in ways they claim were not authorized under the parties’ contract. In their lawsuit, Binance-affiliated entities argue this conduct resulted in substantial customer movement away from Binance Card and toward RedotPay’s own offering.

Damages claim hinges on lifetime customer value

The lawsuit seeks nearly $473 million. In Bloomberg’s account of the filing, the damages calculation is tied to Binance’s estimated lifetime customer value of $925 per user multiplied by the alleged user diversion figure of more than 470,000.

Advertisement

That approach suggests the plaintiffs are not merely pursuing damages for discrete transactions, but for the expected long-term value of a customer base they say was taken from their card product. For investors and market participants tracking crypto payments, the case signals how vigorously major counterparties are now quantifying commercial harm in custody- and payments-adjacent relationships.

Parallel litigation in Singapore adds pressure

Bloomberg further reports that Chaintecs filed a related lawsuit in Singapore. A hearing is scheduled for Friday, according to the court’s published hearing list.

Multiple jurisdictions can matter in crypto-related disputes because different courts may have varying views on contract interpretation, evidence standards, and the enforceability of certain remedies. For parties involved in cross-border payment ecosystems, the existence of parallel proceedings also raises the likelihood that the dispute will stay in the public spotlight longer than a single-country filing.

RedotPay pushes back, says operations will continue

In a statement posted on its website, RedotPay said the legal proceedings would not affect its operations and that it intends to contest the allegations. The company also indicated it would refrain from further comment while the matter is before the court.

Advertisement

“We are confident in our legal position, and are vigorously defending all claims. As the matter is currently before the court, RedotPay will not be commenting further on the allegations, the ongoing proceedings, or matters that will be addressed through the judicial process,” RedotPay said in its published response.

Binance did not provide operational commentary but, according to a spokesperson speaking to Cointelegraph, it would pursue legal options where necessary. The spokesperson said, “While Binance does not comment on ongoing litigation, where necessary we will use courts and other forums to pursue what is right.”

Why this dispute matters for card and payments users

This lawsuit is not just a contractual fight; it highlights the growing importance of compliance and channel controls in crypto card ecosystems. Allegations involving how users load funds—particularly through payment rails like Binance Pay—can directly affect user access, onboarding flows, and which provider ultimately captures transaction-driven value.

Even if the underlying contract is eventually interpreted narrowly, cases like this can influence how payment partners structure permissions, settle revenue-sharing, and document user attribution. Traders and builders watching crypto payments may also take note of how disputes are increasingly tied to quantified customer metrics, signaling a shift away from purely reputational arguments toward measurable economic damages.

Advertisement

As proceedings move forward in Hong Kong and Singapore, the key questions for readers will be what the courts find about the parties’ contract scope—especially whether Binance Pay funding to RedotPay cards fell within agreed boundaries—and how damages, if any, are calculated once the facts are established.

Risk & affiliate notice: Crypto assets are volatile and capital is at risk. This article may contain affiliate links. Read full disclosure

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

Crypto World

World Chain to launch streamed EIP-7928 block access lists

Published

on

World Chain to launch streamed EIP-7928 block access lists
  • World Chain launches streamed EIP-7928 on mainnet Aug. 17.
  • New feature enables parallel block verification for validators.
  • Upgrade targets higher throughput without more hardware.

World Chain said it will become the first production layer-2 blockchain to deploy streamed EIP-7928 block access lists, introducing the feature on its mainnet from Aug. 17 in a move aimed at improving transaction throughput without increasing validator hardware requirements.

The network said it will stream full block access lists inside every flashblock, allowing validators to begin verifying transactions while blocks are still being assembled.

The implementation is designed to address one of the blockchain industry’s key scaling challenges—boosting transaction capacity without compromising decentralization by forcing validators to use increasingly powerful hardware.

According to the company, the rollout marks the first production implementation of streamed EIP-7928 block access lists and contributes to Ethereum’s broader scaling roadmap.

Parallel verification targets higher throughput

On most blockchain networks, validators verify blocks by re-executing every transaction sequentially before confirming a block’s validity.

Advertisement

World Chain said full block access lists change that process by recording the blockchain state that each transaction reads and writes, enabling independent transactions to be verified simultaneously across multiple CPU cores.

The company said its implementation extends the EIP-7928 specification by streaming access list data every 200 milliseconds through its flashblock architecture.

Instead of waiting for an entire block to be completed, validators can begin verifying transactions immediately as the block is built.

World Chain said this approach reduces validation latency while distributing verification work throughout the block-building process.

Advertisement

The network said the technology allows it to target throughput of up to one gigagas per second while keeping validator hardware requirements effectively unchanged.

Deployment avoids hard fork requirement

Unlike Ethereum’s planned implementation of EIP-7928, which is expected to arrive as part of the future Glamsterdam upgrade, World Chain said it is deploying the feature through a runtime flag rather than a hard fork.

This approach allows client operators to upgrade software ahead of the Aug. 17 mainnet rollout without requiring a coordinated network-wide upgrade.

The company said internal benchmarking on World Chain test networks showed validation latency remained effectively stable even as throughput increased substantially, reaching up to one gigagas per second using standard cloud infrastructure.

Advertisement

According to the results, higher transaction throughput can be achieved without a corresponding increase in the computing resources required for independent chain verification.

Focus on scalability and decentralization

World Chain said the rollout is intended to demonstrate a practical approach to improving blockchain scalability while preserving accessibility for independent validators, which it described as an important requirement for maintaining decentralized networks.

The layer-2 network is built using the OP Stack, secured by Ethereum, and forms part of the Superchain ecosystem.

It is integrated with the World protocol and is designed to support applications including stablecoin payments, international remittances, commerce and other real-world use cases.

Advertisement

The network also incorporates World ID’s proof-of-human technology and can be accessed through compatible wallets, including World App.

 

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Crypto World

Michigan Senate Race’s Winners and Losers: AIPAC, CAIR, Whitmer

Published

on

Michigan Senate Race's Winners and Losers: AIPAC, CAIR, Whitmer

Given El-Sayed’s narrow win, that push looks even more impactful, allowing the country’s largest Muslim civil rights groups to more firmly showcase its power in Michigan, as it finds itself targeted on multiple fronts in some red states. 

LOSERS: Establishment Democrats

Stevens was the undisputed choice of the Democratic Establishment. She was a swing state Democrat who previously won on the same ballot as Trump. She had been through the vetting, could raise money, and seemed a practical choice to hold the seat of retiring Democratic Sen. Gary Peters. 

But Washington insiders’ efforts to help Stevens actually worked against her in a year when Democratic voters were more aligned with El-Sayed’s contempt for the Establishment. That anger found a vessel in El-Sayed and a target in Stevens. Even though Democratic leaders didn’t get their way, that doesn’t mean they’re giving up on Michigan. Quickly after El-Sayed’s primary victory became clear, Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer and Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand, the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee Chair, released a statement of support. “We look forward to working with Abdul and Democrats across Michigan to win this seat in November,” they said.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Crypto World

How to Talk Like a Human in the AI Era

Published

on

How to Talk Like a Human in the AI Era
—J Studios—Getty Images

As AI becomes more prevalent in our personal and professional lives, the more we’ll need a way to stand out. In fact, skills like empathy, influence, and the ability to read the room—things AI cannot yet do with accuracy and facility—are already becoming more valuable. 

We are facing an insidious threat to our interpersonal skills, driven not just by AI’s growing capabilities, but by our own diminishing opportunities to actually practice communicating. The expansion of our digital lives has already caused a roughly 28% drop in the words we speak daily between 2005 and 2019, and leaning on AI shrinks those vital practice moments even further. Ultimately, when we offload too much to AI, we aren’t just taking a convenient shortcut; we are actively causing our fundamental capabilities to atrophy and increasing our communication anxiety because we know that if we are challenged, we might not have the depth of knowledge to respond.

With algorithms drafting our emails and smoothing out our speech, the baseline for communication has never been more flawless—or flat and disconnected. Because so many people are hiding behind this generated perfection, we gain a massive competitive edge when we do the exact opposite.

Communicating authentically, revealing our humanness, increases our value by serving as a real-time signal of trust and genuine effort. Because anyone can now generate flawlessly polished text, unscripted moments containing natural flaws and foibles demonstrate that we’re actually investing our own labor and personal touch into the exchange. 

Striving for a hyper-polished veneer is no longer the winning strategy. Instead, the speakers who resonate most today are those who loosen up and embrace a more idiosyncratic, less perfect expressiveness. This means giving yourself grace when using “filler words” such as “uhm” and “like.” And it means emphasizing your unique perspective. To be sure, putting our unvarnished, authentic selves on display can feel intimidating, but audiences respond well to it, and this approach can allow for meaningful connection and influence. 

Advertisement

I experienced this firsthand not long ago when I logged on to speak to 800 people at a live virtual event on best practices for classroom teaching of MBA students. I expected a standard Q&A, but upon arriving, I learned the organizers actually needed me to present solo for 30 minutes. Drawing on my knowledge of the material, I spoke completely impromptu. Did I occasionally veer into a non-sequitur or mangle a sentence? Yes. But the aftermath was a flood of emails from attendees praising the session. They were refreshed to have a speaker who wasn’t reciting a script or hiding behind slides. They appreciated my being me while communicating.

I wasn’t simply winging it, however. I was deliberately letting the audience see more of who I really was.

As humans evolve for the AI era, I created the TRUST framework to help my students at Stanford communicate effectively while embracing their authentic imperfections. Here is how you can use it to project your humanity and establish genuine connection.

Truthful foundation

AI struggles to convey authentic emotion and context, but you do it naturally. Ground your messages in your actual lived experiences, offering specific feelings and the emotions that accompany them. Speak your truth. If you are giving a toast at a wedding, don’t reach for generic platitudes; recount a hyper-specific memory chock-full of genuine emotion that only you would have noticed. 

Advertisement

For instance, during a recent virtual presentation, I didn’t just share teaching theory; I admitted how I had struggled mightily to manage learners of different ability levels, sharing my own insecurity about boring expert students and how it led me to over-monitor their reactions.

Real-time processing 

An AI engine delivers its final, polished output as a completed message. In order to communicate more authentically, you can verbalize what you are thinking in the moment, revealing your internal thought process, and proving to your audience that you are originating content on the spot. Using phrases like “My first inclination is…,” or “When I had a similar question prior,” brings listeners into the all-too-human workings of your mind. 

When responding to a complex chat question regarding non-native speakers during my event, I simply paused and said, “Give me a moment to reflect on this important point.”

Utilize tailored, local evidence

While AI offers generic backing for its conclusions, you can offer the delightfully quirky. Use stories, data, or testimonials that speak exclusively to your unique background to support your logic. If you are pitching a new product, explain how the street signs in your rural Nebraska hometown inspired its visual design. 

Advertisement

To illustrate the challenges of speaking a non-native language, I shared an embarrassing personal story about my own struggles teaching in Beijing.

Show your unique speaking style

For decades, communication coaches counseled clients to ruthlessly eliminate verbal tics and awkward pauses. In the age of AI, those exact imperfections add something vital: a sense of your humanness. You shouldn’t go overboard with “uhs” and “ums,” but you also shouldn’t strive to expunge them completely. My own tendency is to repeat phrases I have recently heard. 

During my impromptu keynote, I found myself repeating “the reality is…” multiple times. Instead of freezing or over-correcting, I gave myself grace and let my unfiltered self come through.

Advertisement

Tip off the audience to your perspective

Information without a point of view is just data. When sharing an update, provide commentary through your unique thoughts and historical perspective. If you describe a new process you developed at work, cap it off with a genuine reflection like, “This was one of the most challenging, but fun solutions I’ve seen our team come up with.” 

During my presentation, I shared that I love puzzles, and that I find the task of crafting unique activities for my students to be among the most fun puzzles to solve.

Throughout our education and experience, we have been conditioned to hide behind a veneer of perfection, but now that perfection is only a prompt away, people are incredibly ready to reward us when we let our authentic selves shine. In a landscape crowded with pixel-perfect output, projecting your humanity is the ultimate way to build trust, to connect, and ultimately to enhance your influence and impact.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Crypto World

Ethereum Proposal Seeks to Cap ETH Staking at 50% of Supply

Published

on

A group of Ethereum contributors has proposed EIP-8361 as a way to reduce staking incentives to ensure that no more than 50% of the supply is locked up by validators.

That proposal has triggered a heated debate over whether Ethereum should prioritize lower issuance or maintain staking incentives for network participation and DeFi activity.

EIP-8361 Targets Rising Staking Levels

On August 4, Ethereum developer Jerome de Tychey announced the submission of EIP-8361, titled “Tapered Issuance Burn,” alongside contributors including Pintail, Dapplion, Pa7x1, Ladislaus0x, and Justin Drake.

In a series of posts on X, de Tychey argued that Ethereum’s current staking model has no point where incentives naturally slow down. He also noted that the staking ratio passed one-third of the ETH supply in April 2026 and continues to rise.

Advertisement

“The incentive to stake never switches off. Where does it stop? It doesn’t,” he wrote.

According to him, the current reward curve could lead to more than 70 million ETH being staked by January 2028, representing more than 55% of supply. He said the validator entry queue is already operating at maximum churn, adding around 1.75 million ETH per month under current conditions.

The proposal would change the situation by burning part of validator rewards as staking participation rises. The burn rate would gradually increase until it reaches 100% when around half of the ETH supply is staked. Under the proposal, staking yield would eventually fall to zero at a 50% staking ratio.

According to de Tychey, the goal is to eliminate the “artificial yield floor” and let the market decide on staking rewards depending on risk. In his view, staking that is too high may lead to security issues since it will push smaller validators out while concentrating ETH among large custodians and staking providers.

The proposal would not change validator duties or execution-layer income. De Tychey said the change requires only one new permanent constant and a consensus-layer adjustment, with Prysm already having a draft implementation of around 300 lines of code.

Advertisement

Community Reacts

The reaction from Ethereum users and builders has been divided. Lawyer Gabriel Shapiro criticized the proposal, calling it ‘a huge distraction” from efforts that could increase demand for ETH.

Aave founder Stani Kulechov stated that rather than decreasing staking rewards, Ethereum should concentrate on privacy, scaling, security, stablecoins, decentralized finance, and real-world assets. Ether.fi’s Mike Silagadze, on his part, opposed the proposal on the basis that lowering rewards could hurt solo stakers and reduce activity across DeFi applications that rely on staking-based strategies.

A CryptoQuant report from July pointed to record staking levels, with around 40 million ETH locked by validators. The firm noted that long-term holders were continuing to stake ETH even as market sentiment remained weak.

Supporters of EIP-8361 argue that reducing issuance could protect ETH holders from dilution and prevent liquid tokens from becoming the dominant form of ETH exposure. One of them, MilliΞ wrote that if everyone stakes, the effective yield approaches zero because everyone owns the same share of supply.

Advertisement

The post Ethereum Proposal Seeks to Cap ETH Staking at 50% of Supply appeared first on CryptoPotato.

Source link

Continue Reading

Crypto World

Nomura’s Laser Digital Backs ZIGChain’s Emerging-Market Private Credit Push

Published

on

Nomura’s Laser Digital Backs ZIGChain’s Emerging-Market Private Credit Push


Laser Digital, the digital assets arm of Japan’s Nomura Group, has taken a stake in ZIGChain’s ZIG token and agreed to structure and oversee risk on a pipeline of onchain private credit products built by ZIG Markets, the Layer 1’s product and access layer. The arrangement puts a Nomura subsidiary… Read the full story at The Defiant

Source link

Continue Reading

Crypto World

Pirate Nation Studio Proof of Play Shuts Down, Open-Sources Code and Art

Published

on

Pirate Nation Studio Proof of Play Shuts Down, Open-Sources Code and Art


Proof of Play, the studio behind the fully onchain game Pirate Nation, said on Tuesday that it is ceasing operations, telling players it "couldn't build a product and sustainable business that proved out this thesis at scale." The thesis, the studio said, was that "games using blockchain tech had… Read the full story at The Defiant

Source link

Continue Reading

Crypto World

RippleX Is Bringing Back Two Features That Had Critical Security Flaws: Will Validators Trust Rewrite?

Published

on

xrp logo

In the latest XRP news, RippleX expects to ship xrpld 3.3.0 the week of August 1, 2026, packaging five amendments for validator consideration, including rewritten versions of Batch and Permission Delegation, both of which were blocked before mainnet activation after security researchers discovered separate critical authorization flaws in their original implementations.

No funds were ever lost. The question now is whether the ecosystem extends enough trust for the rewrites to clear the 80% validator threshold.

Xrp (XRP)
24h7d30d1yAll time

Discover: Everyone’s Got a Take. Get Free $25 to Actually Trade Yours

XRP News: What Broke the First Time, and How

Advertisement

The original Batch amendment contained a signature-validation bug that allowed an attacker to execute inner transactions from arbitrary victim accounts without ever holding their private keys.

According to the official XRPL vulnerability disclosure, researcher Pranamya Keshkamat and Cantina AI’s autonomous audit tool Apex identified the flaw on February 19, 2026, while the amendment was still in its voting phase.

UNL validators were advised to vote against it the same evening; an emergency release, rippled 3.1.1, marked both Batch and the related fixBatchInnerSigs amendment as unsupported to prevent any activation path.

The root cause was a loop-exit error in the signer-validation logic: when the code encountered a new account whose signing key matched its own, it declared success and exited without checking the remaining signers, meaning a forged signer entry for any victim account would never be inspected.

The exploit path let an attacker drain a victim account down to its reserve through unauthorized Payment transactions. The replacement, BatchV1_1, redesigns that authorization logic and is now flagged in the 3.3 development registry as supported with a default No vote pending validator approval.

Permission Delegation exposed a different attack surface. A September 2025 disclosure documented how an invalid offline-signed transaction could still charge the delegated account a transaction fee before failing authorization, because the code checked permissions before verifying the signature, and tec-type errors carry a fee charge by design.

A malicious actor could repeatedly submit such transactions with elevated fees to silently bleed a victim account’s XRP balance. The fix reclassifies the relevant error from tec to ter and reorders checks so no fee can be deducted before signature verification.

Advertisement

The replacement, PermissionDelegationV1_1, carries the same default No designation in the 3.3.0 registry. This pattern of catching bugs before mainnet is consistent with the broader XRPL security maintenance cadence, which has seen multiple hotfix releases address protocol-level issues ahead of activation.

Discover: Your Market Calls Are Worth Something. Start With Free $25 on Kalshi

Three New Amendments Target Institutional Tokenization

The remaining three amendments are new additions aimed at the institutional tokenization market. Confidential MPT uses elliptic-curve cryptography and zero-knowledge proofs for Multi-Purpose Token balances and transfer amounts, keeping them opaque on the public ledger while remaining auditable by designated entities, such as regulators.

Advertisement

It addresses the most consistent objection from financial institutions evaluating public blockchain infrastructure: that counterparty exposure is visible to everyone.

The feature targets tokenized government bonds, real estate, equities, and private credit, asset classes where confidentiality is a baseline operational requirement, not a preference. The broader XRPL push into this space is already underway, with active infrastructure development for capital markets tokenization on the XRP Ledger.

Sponsored Fees and Reserves allow a bank, issuer, or platform to cover transaction fees and reserve requirements on behalf of its users, removing the requirement for end users to hold XRP before transacting.

Advertisement

This substantially lowers onboarding friction for institutional deployments, though it also reopens the structural debate: if end-users no longer need XRP to interact with the ledger, demand dynamics shift toward institutional settlement volume rather than retail token utility. That outcome is neither confirmed nor refuted until the amendment activates and institutions actually deploy it.

Dynamic MPT closes the third gap, allowing token issuers to modify specified properties, fees, metadata, and predefined parameters after issuance without migrating to a new token entirely.

Photo: Jazzi Cooper

Jazzi Cooper, RippleX’s head of product, announced the five amendments on X, describing XRPL as having already demonstrated its capacity to support tokenized assets at scale and framing the new features as the infrastructure layer for global transfers, trading, collateralization, and settlement.

Cooper confirmed that all five require validator voting before activation.

Discover: Get Paid to Be Right, $25 to Start on Kalshi

Advertisement

Don’t Miss Out on Our $1,000 USDT Airdrop on ByBit

The post RippleX Is Bringing Back Two Features That Had Critical Security Flaws: Will Validators Trust Rewrite? appeared first on Cryptonews.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Crypto World

Wall Street Meets Web3: BlackRock, Visa, and Mastercard Back Circle’s New Arc Blockchain

Published

on

USDC stablecoin issuer Circle has announced the founding validator cohort for Arc, its open blockchain network. It is currently in private mainnet with more than 100 ecosystem and institutional builders.

Circle said the network is on track for a public mainnet launch on September 16, 2026.

Behind Circle’s New Blockchain

According to the official post, the founding validator group includes BlackRock, The Depository Trust & Clearing Corporation (DTCC), Galaxy, Global Payments, ICE, Mastercard, MoneyGram, SBI Group, Standard Chartered, Sumitomo Corporation and Visa. Circle said the group represents a model in which institutions building on the network also help secure it.

The aim is to create a foundation of trusted and globally distributed operators that can support secure and scalable on-chain financial applications. BlackRock is also expected to deploy BUIDL, the BlackRock USD Institutional Digital Liquidity Fund, on Arc through the network’s native USDC integration.

Advertisement

The setup is intended to let institutional investors subscribe to, redeem, and deploy fund assets within one on-chain environment.

Circle is also working with DTCC to enable the tokenization of assets custodied by The Depository Trust Company on Arc beginning in the second half of 2027. The main objective is to let market participants use third-party applications on the blockchain for stablecoin-native settlement outside DTC against DTC-tokenized assets. DTCC said the integration supports its multi-chain strategy.

DTC-tokenized assets will continue to carry the same protections, rights, and safeguards available to investors holding assets traditionally.

Commenting on the latest development, Mastercard Chief Product Officer Jorn Lambert said,

Advertisement

“As stablecoins and other digital assets move into real-world payments, settlement, and treasury flows, Mastercard is focused on helping customers operate across an increasingly diverse payments ecosystem. Our participation as a founding validator on Arc reflects that commitment — supporting trusted, interoperable infrastructure that can help connect emerging blockchain networks with the broader financial systems businesses rely on every day.”

Arc Product Suite

Arc is also expected to have a range of applications and services available from day one. DeFi protocols and capital allocators including Aave, Aerodrome, FalconX, Galaxy, GSR, Keyrock, Morpho, Nonco, Uniswap and XFX will support borrowing, trading and on-chain capital deployment.

Meanwhile, payment providers Rain, Thunes and Wirex have been tasked with routing stablecoin payment and settlement flows. Binance Wallet, Chainlink, Fireblocks, Kraken, Ledger, MetaMask, Uniswap Labs and Upbit, on the other hand, will enable access to USDC on Arc, custody and cross-chain asset movement.

At launch, Circle plans to introduce a product suite around Arc, which includes tools for common on-chain workflows, AI-powered applications and smart contract development, tokenized real-world asset management and interfaces for developers, users and agents.

The post Wall Street Meets Web3: BlackRock, Visa, and Mastercard Back Circle’s New Arc Blockchain appeared first on CryptoPotato.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Crypto World

Yellow Card announces $40 million funding round to expand its stablecoin infrastructure

Published

on

Yellow Card announces $40 million funding round to expand its stablecoin infrastructure

Maurice, a former Pokémon card seller, told CoinDesk in a 2024 podcast interview that he and Justin Poiroux, the firm’s chief technology officer, founded Yellow Card to take on big banks and Swift, the interbank service that processes over 53 million secure messaging instructions a day for nearly 11,500 financial institutions. Swift facilitates trillions of dollars in global bank transactions and said last month it was testing its first blockchain ledger.

Yellow Card, which focuses mostly on emerging markets, will use the new capital to expand Global USD Accounts, its dollar account product for businesses, and add stablecoin and local payment mechanisms in Latin America and Asia-Pacific.

The accounts allow businesses to hold dollars, hold and swap stablecoins, manage treasury operations and collect or disburse local currencies through domestic payment rails in more than 50 countries, Yellow Card said.

Maurice said the company’s flows have historically been split roughly evenly between corporates and large financial institutions using its treasury-management and payments infrastructure. Bank volumes are now growing faster as large institutions adopt the company’s system, he said.

Advertisement

Yellow Card kicked off its operations in Africa, said Maurice, where it built operations across fragmented country-by-country regulatory jurisdictions. The firm said that since its founding in 2016, it has facilitated more than $10 billion in transactions and holds licenses, authorizations or registrations in 22 jurisdictions.

Source link

Continue Reading

Crypto World

What Is 'Russia's Amazon' Wildberries and Why Is Ukraine Targeting It?

Published

on

What Is 'Russia's Amazon' Wildberries and Why Is Ukraine Targeting It?
Smoke rises after Ukrainian strikes on a Wildberries warehouse in St. Petersburg, Russia, on July 24, 2026. —AFP—Getty Images

Ukraine hit at least two warehouses belonging to Russia’s e-commerce giant Wildberries in overnight strikes on Monday, adding to a series of drone attacks that have targeted the online retailer.

Ukrainian forces have repeatedly struck warehouses belonging to Russia’s largest online retailer as part of a broader campaign against logistics sites that Kyiv says support Moscow’s military.

Often described as Russia’s “Amazon,” Wildberries operates dozens of warehouses across the country and plays a core role in the Russian consumer economy.

Since July 18, Ukraine has targeted close to 20 of the retailer’s sites, referring to them as military-linked “logistic centers.”

Moscow and Wildberries have denied that the facilities supply the armed forces.

Advertisement

The strikes have drawn attention not only because of their reach inside Russia, but also because of Wildberries’ economic importance, its ties to the country’s financial sector, and the potential impact on ordinary Russian consumers.

”Ukraine’s Defense Forces struck the Wildberries logistics center in Krasny Bor near St. Petersburg. Burning again,” read an update from the Defense of Ukraine on Tuesday. “Russian logistics, dismantled one hub at a time.”

The social media statement was accompanied by a video showcasing a large, white-painted building engulfed in flames.
“Wildberries was used to distribute military and dual-use goods,” read the caption across the footage. “We will continue dismantling the enemy’s logistics.”

https://x.com/DefenceU/status/2084653333068055029

Advertisement

With the Russia-Ukraine war now in its fifth year, Kyiv has shifted its military strategy as it continues to come under heavy bombardment from Moscow. Ukraine has increasingly used long-range drone strikes to target infrastructure and supply networks deep inside Russia. Amid a broader government reshuffle near the end of July, Kyiv gained a new military chief, Mykhailo Drapatyi, who Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky has tasked with leading the country’s precise defensive efforts.

With Kyiv vowing to maintain its focus on the retailer’s hubs, here’s what to know about Wildberries, its high-profile founder, and why it’s being targeted.

What is Wildberries—and who founded it?

The online retailer, which hosts third-party sellers, facilitates everything from household goods to air travel, and even has a financial arm, WB Bank.

In May, Wildberries announced a strategic partnership with VTB Bank, a Russian majority state-owned institution.

Advertisement

VTB Bank shares fell around 2.5% on July 28 amid ongoing strikes, according to Reuters.

Days after Ukraine’s July 18 strikes against the Wildberries sites, the European Commission included the WB Bank when E.U. member states adopted its 21st package of sanctions against Russia.

“Wildberries Bank LLC is involved in an economic sector providing a substantial source of revenue to the Government of the Russian Federation, which is responsible for the annexation of Crimea and the destabilisation of Ukraine,” declared the council of the European Union.

Wildberries was founded by Tatyana Kim, formerly Tatyana Bakalchuk, in 2004.

Advertisement

A former English teacher, Kim was 28-years-old and on maternity leave when she launched the initiative, and was later joined by her now ex-husband, Vladislav Bakalchuk.

As Wildberries grew, Kim’s fortune did too. Forbes estimates her net worth at $8.1 billion, making her Russia’s richest woman.

She was the only Russian entry on Forbes’ 2025 list of “The 50 Richest Self-Made Women On Earth.”

“Wildberries has grown from small origins to be one of two major internet marketplaces in Russia [alongside Ozon],” says Charles Hecker, an associate fellow in international security at the Royal United Services Institute think tank. “It’s an enormously prominent company and Kim is an incredibly prominent business person in Russia.”

Advertisement

Why is Ukraine targeting Russia’s ‘Amazon’?

Kyiv insists Wildberries is being used as a key supply chain for the Russian military.

“Ukraine’s official reason behind attacking Wildberries is that Ukraine believes the website is used as a channel for military components,” Hecker tells TIME.

After Wildberries sites were struck on July 18, Zelensky announced that “two major logistics facilities were hit—in the Moscow and Tambov regions” and said “the aggressor [Russia] used them to supply sanctioned components for drone production and navigation equipment.”

Kremlin spokesperson Dmitry Peskov has refuted accusations that Wildberries warehouses are used for Russian army supplies.

Advertisement

Kim has also rejected the allegations. In a July 31 video statement uploaded to Telegram, she argued Kyiv’s drone attacks on sites linked to Wildberries amount to “acts of terrorism” against civilians.

In response to accusations that ⁠Wildberries sells dual-use goods, items that can have both civilian and military uses, Kim said ​the company doesn’t offer anything that is ​not ⁠also available on major global e-commerce platforms such as Amazon or Alibaba.

After previous drone strikes on its facilities, the e-commerce giant issued statements pledging financial support for sellers whose goods were damaged.

The retailer’s ties to the country’s financial sector and the far-reaching economic impact of the strikes is a key factor to consider, experts say.

Advertisement

Putin said at the beginning of the full-scale invasion of Ukraine that the war would not impact the way Russians lead their lives,” Hecker tells TIME. “But attacking Wildberries impacts the Russian consumer, and this comes on top of inflation, on top of periodic mobile internet outages across Russia.”

While inflation in Russia has climbed down from highs of 9.4% last year, it rose once again to 6% in June—its highest level since January. 

Consumers in Russia are also tackling a summer fuel crisis after Ukraine stepped up its drone attacks on oil refineries.

“It’s difficult now for President Putin to say that the war on Ukraine is not impacting the way ordinary Russians live,” Hecker says, reflecting on the economic blows. “Ukraine has discovered how successfully it can penetrate airspace deep into Russian territory, and I think what it’s doing right now is exploiting that capability.”

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2025