Crypto World
Bitcoin Rally Signals Broader Crypto Recovery, Not Regrets
Crypto’s mood has been getting dragged lower for months, even as market prices have started to rebound. In August, Bitcoin posted a strong monthly performance—reported as its best August in years—with returns cited at 26%, while Ethereum gained 34%. The renewed attention has also spilled into mainstream political moments, including President Trump’s comments at the White House praising a decentralized offshore perpetual futures venue, as covered by Cointelegraph Markets.
Yet a price uptick doesn’t automatically settle the deeper questions many long-time participants have been asking: whether crypto delivered on its most ambitious promises, and whether today’s “wins” look different from what the industry originally pitched.
Key takeaways
- Bitcoin’s reported best August in years and Ethereum’s jump have lifted attention, but the broader “sovereign money” narrative still clashes with custodial structures like ETFs.
- Perpetual swaps—once a key differentiator—have become standard across compliant exchanges, reducing the advantage held by early derivatives pioneers.
- Several industry leaders argue crypto’s impact is real, but less about replacing legacy finance and more about being absorbed into it through settlement, tokenization, and stablecoins.
- Despite growing legitimacy and wider adoption, users still face friction: too many networks, wallets, exchanges, bridges, and onramps to navigate.
- Self-custody remains a high-risk expectation, and the bear-market pain has been intensified by the difficulty of delivering a “future” that feels safer and easier.
From build-anything optimism to today’s “it’s absorbed” reality
The article’s interviews frame the current moment as a transition: crypto’s technology has spread beyond its original bubble, but the industry’s cultural promise hasn’t matched its commercial outcomes for everyone. Former BitMEX CEO Stephan Lutz argues crypto can’t simply vanish because key mechanisms are already woven into broader financial infrastructure.
Moonshot Capital founder Utkarsh Ahuja echoes that view, pointing to spillover effects including payment rails, settlement, and tokenization. He highlights stablecoins as a potentially durable part of financial payments and notes the expanding idea that “you can literally tokenize anything.” In his view, adoption outside crypto-native circles—across sectors such as energy, healthcare, and AI—is proof the work wasn’t wasted, even if the end result looks less like a separate parallel world.
Subsquid Labs CEO Wanja Oberhof makes a similar infrastructure argument through decentralization: DeFi’s value, he says, is the ability to verify a ledger in real time down to individual transactions, reducing reliance on an operator’s word. He also describes DeFi settlement speed—minutes rather than days—and market availability running 24/7, with lending protocols capable of processing large volumes transparently.
But Oberhof concedes that DeFi did not always land the experience users expected. He argues the sector “over-promised on timelines and under-delivered on user experience,” and suggests the real breakthrough comes only when the technology becomes invisible—embedded in products people use without consciously thinking about blockchains.
Derivatives didn’t fail—differentiation did
One of the clearest “winners and losers” examples comes from crypto derivatives history. BitMEX—described as an early Bitcoin futures exchange that helped popularize perpetual swaps and leveraged trading—has shut down operations in September after 11 years, according to earlier Cointelegraph coverage. Lutz characterizes BitMEX’s end as a case of being copied rather than being obsolete.
In a quote, Lutz says that what once made BitMEX distinctive—perpetual swaps and the associated funding mechanism that aligns longs and shorts—has become standard across “every legitimate crypto exchange.” In other words, the technology’s success removed the very edge the founders built around. As a result, today’s competitive landscape is less about inventing infrastructure and more about execution and aggressive market positioning, which some firms win and others can’t sustain.
This framing matters for investors and builders because it shifts the evaluation criteria. In the early years, differentiation often came from technical novelty. Now, according to Lutz’s argument, differentiation increasingly comes from scale, strategy, and market-share competition—factors that don’t always favor the original innovators.
Legitimacy rose, but convenience and trust lagged
Even while regulations have made crypto more acceptable to traditional institutions, the article suggests that “legitimacy” hasn’t automatically translated into simpler day-to-day use. Regulation has also contributed to a more regulated and, in some ways, more predictable environment—yet that predictability can reduce the borderless promise crypto markets advertised.
The text cites regulatory progress such as the EU’s implementation of Markets in Crypto Assets (MiCA) and the US move toward building a formal framework for crypto. It also references discussion around a potential CLARITY act. The implication is that the direction of travel is clear: rules are tightening, but they’re still not uniform enough to eliminate friction across jurisdictions.
Ahuja’s interview comments point to a mismatch between crypto’s stated goal—seamless value transfer—and the reality of national regulatory regimes shaping how assets can move. The article includes an anecdote from a Dubai-based crypto user who reportedly receives salary into a centralized exchange, loses money converting USDT into local currency, and pays a flat withdrawal fee of 75 AED (roughly $20). They say they wish they could receive a bank transfer instead.
For users, the practical takeaway is straightforward: even as on-chain rails exist, many real-world workflows remain routed through centralized platforms and local constraints. The promised simplification doesn’t fully arrive when compliance, conversion costs, and access rules dominate the experience.
Self-custody remains a paradox—and morale takes a hit
The article also highlights a tension at the heart of crypto’s original pitch: self-custody. While proponents have long argued that holding private keys is the route to real sovereignty, the piece points out that greater Bitcoin value can raise the stakes of holding keys—whether due to physical theft risks or the expanding threat environment, including cold wallet exploitation framed in the article.
It’s this “failure to deliver the future” that, in the article’s telling, has made bear-market shutdowns and closures feel especially harsh. The text notes that layoffs have been widespread throughout the industry and that projects that survived the 2022 bear market have since shut down or been forced to pivot. Some are reportedly reinventing themselves by leaning into AI, a newer trend that has seen adoption crypto can only dream of—at least in the sense of who is capturing attention and resources right now.
Meanwhile, the article argues that Lutz does not interpret BitMEX’s fate as proof the underlying technology failed. Instead, he suggests the derivatives model worked so well that everyone copied it, and the contest moved to a different game: market share and competitive aggressiveness. That distinction can help readers interpret closures without concluding that the core innovations were wrong.
What to watch next as narratives reset with price
With Bitcoin and Ethereum posting strong performance and public figures generating fresh headlines, narratives are likely to tighten around “why this rally will last.” But the article’s central warning is that price momentum doesn’t resolve the long-running issues around custodial versus non-custodial ideals, user friction, and the real-world risks of self-custody. The next signal to watch is whether infrastructure improvements translate into better usability and clearer pathways for everyday users—or whether the industry continues to measure progress primarily through charts.
Crypto World
Binance Adds Options on 1,000 US Stocks and ETFs as TradFi Push Grows
Binance is moving deeper into traditional finance, launching options trading on more than 1,000 US stocks and exchange-traded funds for eligible users outside the United States. The exchange says the product will be provided through its Abu Dhabi-regulated broker-dealer, Nest Trading, with orders routed to US-registered Alpaca Securities for execution, clearing, settlement, and custody.
The offering builds on Binance’s existing equities lineup, which includes more than 7,000 US stocks and ETFs. Binance also emphasized that these are physically settled options—meaning users who exercise receive or deliver the underlying shares—rather than equity-linked perpetual futures.
Key takeaways
- Binance will offer options on 1,000+ US stocks and ETFs to eligible non-US users via Nest Trading.
- Execution, clearing, settlement, and custody will be handled through orders routed to Alpaca Securities.
- The options are physically settled, distinguishing them from perpetual futures structures.
- Binance points to rapidly growing TradFi-related activity, citing a sharp rise in TradFi perpetual futures volume in August.
- Broader exchange competition is accelerating tokenized equities access across major venues, including Coinbase, Kraken, and Robinhood.
How Binance’s options rollout is structured
Rather than positioning options as a native onchain product, Binance is integrating it into a conventional market plumbing setup. According to Binance, the options will be offered through Nest Trading, its Abu Dhabi-regulated broker-dealer. When users place trades, Binance routes those orders to Alpaca Securities, which is registered in the United States and will manage execution and post-trade operations.
This matters for readers trying to understand what is actually being delivered on the Binance platform. The exchange is not describing a new settlement model or new clearing network; instead, it is extending access to standard equity options while keeping the core regulatory and operational workflow within established TradFi channels.
Physically settled options, not perpetuals
Binance explicitly contrasts the new product with its equity-linked perpetual futures. Unlike perpetual contracts, physically settled options are tied to the underlying asset delivery. If a user exercises, they receive or deliver the corresponding shares.
For traders, that distinction affects both risk management and what happens at expiration. Perpetual futures generally avoid physical delivery mechanics, while physically settled options introduce share-based outcomes if users exercise. In practice, this may better align with strategies that require actual stock exposure or stock-based collateral considerations rather than purely derivatives exposure.
Why the timing: Binance cites surging TradFi trading activity
Binance attributes the rollout to accelerating engagement in traditional financial products on its platform. The exchange specifically cited TradFi perpetual futures volume reaching about $433 billion in August—roughly 15 times January’s total.
This is an important framing because it suggests Binance is responding to measurable demand rather than launching options as a speculative add-on. Still, readers should note that this figure relates to TradFi perpetual futures volume, not necessarily options volume. The company’s argument is that overall interest in TradFi instruments on the platform has surged, creating an environment where options products can find an audience.
Tokenized equities keep expanding across exchanges
Binance’s move sits within a broader push by exchanges and brokerages toward tokenized and onchain-wrapped equity exposure. As crypto venues expand their catalog of TradFi-adjacent products, the onchain stock market has grown quickly over the past year, according to RWA.xyz.
RWA.xyz data shows tokenized stocks have around $2.6 billion in distributed value, up from roughly $346 million a year earlier. It also reports that monthly transfer volume rose 93% over the past 30 days to $25.1 billion, while the number of holders increased 157% to nearly 2.5 million. These figures reflect both increased throughput and broader participation—two conditions that often make additional derivative products more feasible for platforms.
Last week, Coinbase brought its B20 tokenized equities to Base, offering eligible non-US users 24/7 access to onchain versions of well-known US-listed companies including Apple, Nvidia, Meta, and Alphabet. Coinbase also stated that the assets can be used in DeFi contexts such as trading and collateralized borrowing.
Separately, Kraken expanded equities access in August by opening more than 7,000 US-listed stocks for eligible European customers, placing them alongside its tokenized xStocks offerings. In July, Robinhood launched “Robinhood Chain” and introduced a new generation of Stock Tokens available to eligible users across more than 120 countries, highlighting how large brokerages are extending beyond traditional order-book access toward token-based settlement rails.
Taken together, these developments suggest a competitive landscape where venues are layering new TradFi instruments over blockchain-adjacent infrastructure. Binance’s options launch appears to be a continuation of that pattern—moving from spot-style equity access toward derivatives that can serve more complex hedging and exposure strategies.
What to watch next
As Binance rolls out physically settled options for non-US eligible users, traders and investors should pay attention to how order routing and settlement behave in practice on the platform—especially around exercise, delivery workflows, and any product-specific eligibility constraints. Longer term, the key question is whether demand for derivatives on these platforms scales at the same pace as tokenized equity adoption and TradFi perpetual futures activity.
Crypto World
XRP price targets $1.70 as Bitwise ETF tops $500M
XRP traded near $1.37 on Sept. 1 after retreating from its August peak near $1.70, leaving traders divided over whether its recent breakout remains intact.
Summary
- XRP traded near $1.37 after losing 8.2% weekly while remaining up 25.9% monthly overall.
- Bitwise XRP ETF held 365.35 million tokens worth $507.23 million as of August 30, official data showed.
- Analyst Ali Martinez placed XRP’s next target at $1.70 after calling resistance cleared this week.
- Daily RSI remained positive near 60.6, while MACD showed weakening short-term bullish momentum currently overall.
- XRP must hold support near $1.30–$1.35 and reclaim $1.50–$1.60 to strengthen its rebound case further.
The token fell approximately 0.6% over 24 hours and 8.2% during the preceding seven days, according to crypto.news data. XRP remained up 25.9% over 30 days following its recovery from the $1 area.
Analyst Ali Martinez said XRP had “cleared resistance” and described the breakout as confirmed. He placed the next target at $1.70, although price had already moved back below the breakout area by the time of reporting.
XRP price tests support after its August rally
XRP’s daily chart shows a strong recovery from its August low followed by a pullback from the $1.70 region. The price is now consolidating around $1.36 to $1.38, near an area that previously acted as resistance.
The immediate support range sits between $1.30 and $1.35. Holding this area would preserve the sequence of higher lows established during the August rebound. A daily close below it would weaken the short-term structure and expose lower support near $1.27.
The first major resistance range is between $1.50 and $1.60. XRP would need to reclaim that zone and hold above it before another test of $1.70 becomes more credible.
XRP remains in a broader downtrend when measured from its previous highs above $3. The recent recovery improved its short-term structure, but it has not yet confirmed a full reversal of that longer decline.
The Relative Strength Index stood near 60.6 on the daily chart. A reading above 50 indicates that positive momentum remains, although the indicator has fallen from its recent overbought level.

The RSI also remained below its moving average near 72.3, showing that momentum cooled as XRP retreated from the August peak. The indicator is no longer overheated, but it has not produced a fresh acceleration signal.
Bitwise XRP ETF crosses $507 million
The Bitwise XRP ETF held approximately 365.35 million XRP worth $507.23 million as of Aug. 30, according to the fund’s official data.
The NYSE Arca-listed product had 32.71 million shares outstanding and charged an expense ratio of 0.34%. Coinbase Custody Trust held the fund’s XRP, while Bank of New York Mellon served as trust custodian and administrator.
The latest total represented a sharp increase from June 30, when the fund held 286.84 million XRP and reported $299.15 million in net assets. Its holdings therefore increased by approximately 78.5 million XRP between quarter-end and Aug. 30.
A rising asset total does not come entirely from new investor cash. Assets under management can increase through share creations, which require additional XRP, and through gains in the token’s market price.
Bitwise’s second-quarter filing showed that investors added approximately 181.53 million XRP worth $269.85 million through share creations during the first half of 2026. Redemptions removed about 25.61 million XRP.
The trust’s net assets rose from $241.37 million at the end of December to $299.15 million on June 30 despite a $176.61 million decrease from operations. The filing attributed most of that reduction to XRP falling from $1.82 to $1.04 during the period.
XRP breakout targets remain unconfirmed
Martinez’s $1.70 target is a technical forecast rather than an assured price level. XRP must first remain above support and recover the resistance lost during its latest pullback.
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence indicator also points to weaker momentum. The MACD line stood near 0.0834, slightly below its signal line around 0.0851, while the histogram was marginally negative.
This configuration suggests that the bullish momentum behind the August recovery is fading. It does not yet establish a strong bearish trend because both MACD lines remain above zero.
Other analysts have offered wider forecasts. Diana identified potential targets at $1.88 and $7.07 using Elliott Wave analysis, while XRP Update proposed levels extending from $2.50 to $13.
Those projections rely on patterns and assumptions that have not been confirmed by subsequent price action. They should not be presented as expected outcomes.
The bearish scenario also remains active. Crypto Lens said XRP could fall toward $1.17 before beginning another recovery. ChartNerd identified the 20-week exponential moving average near $1.27 as a possible support floor after XRP failed to reclaim its 50-week average.
ETF demand has not prevented XRP volatility
Institutional demand through U.S. exchange-traded products has continued despite XRP’s price swings. As crypto.news previously reported, XRP ETF trading volume reached an all-time high during the August rally.
Seven U.S. spot XRP funds had recorded approximately $1.57 billion in cumulative net inflows by Aug. 24. The latest external estimates placed that total above $1.6 billion by the end of the month.
ETF creations can require issuers or authorized participants to obtain more XRP. However, fund demand does not guarantee price gains because selling from other market participants can offset those purchases.
XRP previously recorded its strongest weekly rally since the SEC settlement before entering the current correction. The sharp rise and subsequent pullback show that institutional inflows have not removed short-term volatility.
The next confirmation will come from price rather than analyst targets. Holding $1.30 to $1.35 would keep the recovery structure intact. Reclaiming $1.50 to $1.60 would strengthen the case for another $1.70 test, while losing support would shift attention toward $1.27 and $1.17.
Disclosure: This article does not represent investment advice. The content and materials featured on this page are for educational purposes only.
Crypto World
3 Reasons Why Shiba Inu (SHIB) May Plunge This Month
July and August have been quite successful for the self-proclaimed Dogecoin killer, with its price closing both months in the green.
Nonetheless, certain important elements suggest that September may not be as beneficial and could deliver a move south.
The Worrying Signals
The first concerning element on the list is Shiba Inu’s burn rate, which has declined by 6% on a monthly scale. Data shows that less than 600 million tokens have been sent to a null address throughout August, an amount whose USD equivalent is negligible.
The burning mechanism aims to reduce the overall supply of the meme coin and potentially make it more valuable, but little to no activity on that front poses a serious obstacle to that mission.
Next is Shibarium’s stalled activity. The layer-2 scaling solution was exploited last year, and since then, the number of processed daily transactions has dropped to mere hundreds or even thousands (at most).

The feature has been labeled numerous times as important for the overall advancement of Shiba Inu’s ecosystem and something that can positively impact its price.
Last but not least, we shall mention the seasonal element. September has been a predominantly poor month for SHIB, with its price finishing the period in the red three out of five times. In 2022, July and August were green (just like this year), yet the following month stopped the uptrend. We have yet to see whether history will repeat itself.

The Bright Side
Not all aspects suggest that the meme coin could experience a downtrend in the coming weeks.
According to CryptoQuant, the amount of SHIB held on exchanges has declined over the past month, signaling that investors continue to abandon centralized platforms in favor of self-custody. This, in turn, reduces immediate selling pressure and could set the stage for a potential additional price ascent.

The post 3 Reasons Why Shiba Inu (SHIB) May Plunge This Month appeared first on CryptoPotato.
Crypto World
RedStone brings instant exits to NYLIM tokenized fund
RedStone has announced plans to give holders of Centrifuge’s tokenized NYLIM U.S. high-yield bond fund same-block exits through offchain auctions lasting about 300 milliseconds.
Summary
- RedStone Settle will provide same-block exits for HYB, whose standard redemption period is T+3.
- KYC-approved liquidity providers will bid on the discount required to purchase fund units immediately.
- Atomic transactions and bonded solver deposits are designed to limit failed settlement and front-running.
- RedStone said prefunded vaults will supply backstop liquidity when direct participation is insufficient.
RedStone said in a Sept. 1 announcement shared with crypto.news that its Settle service is being integrated with the NYLIM Anemoy U.S. High Yield Corporate Bond Segregated Portfolio, known by the ticker HYB.
Issued through Centrifuge, HYB is the first tokenized fund sub-advised by New York Life Investment Management. NYLIM manages $838 billion in assets, according to the latest figure provided by RedStone, up from the roughly $807 billion reported when the fund was introduced in June.
The integration is designed to let HYB holders, lending protocols, and liquidators sell fund units within one blockchain transaction. A liquidity provider supplies the immediate capital, takes possession of the units, and later completes the fund’s regular redemption process.
Although RedStone describes the service as T+0 settlement, HYB’s underlying redemption period remains T+3. Settle instead transfers the waiting period to an approved liquidity provider willing to hold the units in return for a discount.
RedStone Settle uses a 300-millisecond auction
When RedStone identifies a position eligible for liquidation, the system runs an offchain auction lasting approximately 300 milliseconds, RedStone co-founder and COO Marcin Kazmierczak told crypto.news.
KYC-verified and whitelisted liquidity providers, called solvers, bid according to the discount they require from the HYB reference price. The bid closest to a 0% discount wins, meaning the seller receives the price nearest to the fund unit’s calculated value.
Once the auction ends, RedStone combines its latest price update and the liquidation instruction in one atomic onchain transaction. Kazmierczak said the structure prevents front-running because the price submission and execution happen together rather than through separate transactions.
Atomic execution also means every part of the transaction must succeed, or the entire operation reverts. According to Kazmierczak, the winning solver has a bonded deposit that can be slashed if it fails to supply the promised capital.
The solver then redeems the acquired HYB units through the issuer’s standard T+3 process and keeps the auction discount as compensation for providing immediate liquidity and accepting the redemption delay.
No large onchain liquidity pool is required under RedStone’s model. The company said Centrifuge and NYLIM also do not need to supply capital for early exits or change the fund’s existing redemption operations.
“Tokenization solved issuance. It did not solve settlement — and settlement is what defines whether an asset scales onchain with broader utility,” Kazmierczak said.
According to the executive, lending market curators need confidence that liquidators can dispose of collateral when a loan becomes undercollateralized. A known exit price and settlement time could allow curators to calculate lending limits without relying on an uncertain redemption queue, he added.
HYB auctions start from administrator-derived NAV
Because high-yield corporate bonds do not trade continuously like cryptocurrencies, the HYB auction will not begin with a price taken from a round-the-clock spot market.
Kazmierczak said RedStone’s fundamental price feed will determine the starting value using net asset value data derived from the fund administrator. Solvers then compete by submitting the percentage discount they require to acquire and redeem the units.
The pricing method places the fund administrator’s NAV at the center of the auction, while solver bids account for the cost and risk of waiting through the redemption period. RedStone said the structure can also process voluntary redemptions and deleveraging transactions, rather than operating only when a loan enters liquidation.
In a stressed market, however, the auction still requires enough capital from eligible solvers. Asked what would happen if too few providers participated or no suitable bid appeared, Kazmierczak said prefunded vaults would also join auctions and were intended to keep backstop liquidity available onchain.
Continuous and defensible pricing has remained a separate obstacle for tokenized assets used in lending. An August report on Stellar’s DeFi gap found that its RWA market had exceeded $3 billion, while pools on Blend that could accept RWAs held only slightly more than $2 million.
RedStone said in that report that tokenized corporate debt requires pricing systems to account for credit quality, maturity, settlement terms, and security structure. Fund administrator data is especially important when the underlying portfolio lacks continuous public trading.
NYLIM’s HYB fund moves from issuance to collateral
Centrifuge and NYLIM introduced the HYB fund in June, giving eligible investors onchain access to NYLIM’s U.S. high-yield corporate bond strategy.
Under the original structure, subscriptions and redemptions settle in USDC, while NYLIM retains responsibility for the portfolio, investment process, and risk management. Centrifuge supplies the tokenization and fund infrastructure rather than managing the underlying bonds.
RedStone said HYB units will be made available as collateral in markets built on Morpho, a decentralized lending protocol with isolated pools. Each Morpho market can set separate collateral assets, loan-to-value limits, and liquidation parameters, keeping the conditions attached to HYB apart from unrelated lending pools.
The integration could allow an eligible holder to borrow against HYB rather than sell the position, subject to the rules and liquidity of the relevant Morpho market. RedStone said curators could use the auction’s settlement terms when deciding how much credit to extend against each unit.
In May, Morpho’s lending infrastructure expanded to Tempo, where Gauntlet and Sentora introduced curated markets, and RedStone supplied price feeds for stablecoins and tokenized real-world assets. The HYB integration applies the three services—pricing, market curation and lending—to a tokenized U.S. corporate bond portfolio.
Access will remain permissioned because HYB transfers require approved participants. Kazmierczak said other tokenized funds could use Settle if they support KYC or business-verification whitelists, connect to a reliable NAV feed, and maintain clear redemption terms that let solvers price the waiting period.
Tokenized credit gains another high-yield product
HYB is entering a tokenized credit market that now includes high-yield strategies from several established U.S. investment managers.
In August, Securitize launched a separate fund managed with Neuberger Berman that invests mainly in high-yield bonds. RedStone said it supplies pricing infrastructure for that strategy as well.
RWA.xyz data cited in RedStone’s announcement placed tokenized real-world assets above $38 billion in August, compared with about $5.4 billion in early 2025. The same data put tokenized U.S. government debt at $16.2 billion and tokenized credit at $7.3 billion.
RedStone said more than 1.7 million addresses held tokenized real-world assets during August, following a 56% monthly increase. Wallet or blockchain addresses, however, do not necessarily correspond to the same number of individual investors.
Citi has projected that tokenized assets could reach $5.5 trillion by 2030, while Standard Chartered has estimated a $2 trillion market by 2028. Both figures remain institutional projections rather than measured commitments or completed token issuances.
Crypto World
Predict.fun rolls out self-service developer dashboard
Predict.fun has launched a self-service developer dashboard that lets builders create applications, generate API keys, monitor usage and manage rate limits from one interface.
Summary
- Developers can create Predict.fun applications and generate API keys without opening a manual support request.
- The dashboard displays API usage and lets developers request higher usage-based rate-limit tiers.
- Existing API keys can be imported into the portal for centralized management.
- New applications receive trade burst limits for order creation and cancellation by default.
Predict.fun developer dashboard centralizes API access
Predict.fun said in a post on X that the new portal gives developers direct control over several tasks previously handled through separate support channels. Users can create applications, issue keys, and view their current usage limits through the dashboard.
Existing keys can also be imported, allowing developers with active integrations to manage them alongside newly created credentials. Predict.fun did not disclose whether imported keys retain their current permissions or require any changes during the transfer.
Before the dashboard launch, Predict.fun’s public developer documentation directed users to join its Discord server and open a support ticket to request an API key. The documentation describes the platform’s REST API as a beta product and asks developers to report problems through the same Discord channel.
Moving key generation into a self-service portal removes that manual step for new applications. Predict.fun did not specify whether Discord-based requests will remain available or whether all future key management will move to the dashboard.
The portal also gives developers access to their usage and rate-limit information. When an application requires more capacity, its owner can manually request a higher usage-based tier through the interface, according to the announcement.
Predict.fun did not publish the request criteria, review period, or call allowances attached to each tier. The company also did not say whether access to higher limits carries a fee or depends on an application’s trading activity.
Trade burst limits apply to order activity
Alongside the dashboard, Predict.fun has introduced “trade burst” limits covering calls used to create and cancel orders. The control restricts how many of those requests an application can send each second.
Every new application will have the restriction enabled by default. Existing applications will receive the burst limit the next time their owners request an adjustment to their rate limits, rather than having it added immediately across all active integrations.
The company did not disclose the number of order calls allowed per second or whether the ceiling differs between usage tiers. It also did not provide separate limits for creating and canceling orders.
Predict.fun’s API documentation shows that developers can submit new orders, remove individual orders, and cancel groups of orders through dedicated endpoints. Applications can also retrieve market data, order books, market statistics, account activity, and user positions.
For live data, the platform provides WebSocket connections covering subscriptions, response formats, and heartbeats. Its developer tools also include OAuth endpoints through which an integrated application can finalize a connection, place or cancel orders, and retrieve a connected user’s positions.
The order-related restrictions apply to the rate at which applications send requests, not to the number of markets developers can display or the total positions held by users. Predict.fun did not announce changes to its market-data, account, or WebSocket limits.
No security incident or service disruption was cited as the reason for introducing the controls. The company described them as part of the updated usage-management system available through its developer portal.
Dashboard follows Predict.fun’s BNB Chain expansion
The developer release follows several additions to Predict.fun’s distribution and infrastructure during 2026. Built on BNB Chain, the platform lets users trade tokenized positions tied to outcomes in categories including crypto, sports, politics, and economic events.
Predict.fun completed its acquisition of Probable in March. Probable had been incubated by PancakeSwap and YZi Labs before its technology was folded into Predict.fun’s product stack.
The companies said the transaction would combine their work on market design, order execution, and collateral use. Binance founder Changpeng Zhao welcomed the deal at the time, describing it as a combination of two projects operating in BNB Chain’s prediction-market sector.
In April, YZi Labs disclosed a follow-on Predict.fun investment that included Susquehanna Crypto, the digital-asset arm of Susquehanna International Group. Figures shared with the announcement showed that Predict.fun had processed more than 4 million orders and over $1.8 billion in cumulative trading volume since launching in December 2025.
YZi Labs said Predict.fun had graduated from the second season of its EASY Residency program. The investor described the protocol as combining self-custody, gasless transactions, and yield earned on collateral while prediction positions remain open.
Developer access could allow third-party interfaces and trading services to connect to the same underlying markets, although Predict.fun has not named any new applications built through the dashboard. The platform’s API already supports market discovery, order-book data, trade execution, account activity and position tracking.
Predict.fun’s existing distribution includes Binance Wallet, which added in-app market access in April. Under that integration, Predict.fun operates the events, pricing, and resolution rules while eligible Binance Wallet users reach the markets through the Binance app.
The integration supports market and limit orders, with transactions executed through Predict.fun’s smart contracts. Binance Wallet said it sponsors trading and settlement gas fees and allows users to trade with balances held in their spot and funding accounts.
US prediction markets face separate access rules
Predict.fun did not state whether applications created through the dashboard may serve users in the United States. Its announcement focused on developer access, key management and technical request limits rather than regional availability or regulatory permissions.
For US developers, an API key does not itself establish permission to offer event contracts to American customers. Platforms serving that market can face federal commodities requirements as well as state rules governing sports betting and gambling products.
Binance.US said in July that it planned to seek a Commodity Futures Trading Commission-designated contract market license as part of its effort to offer federally regulated prediction markets. If approved, the license would allow the exchange to list event contracts under CFTC oversight.
The reported CFTC license plan would place Binance.US in a segment that already includes federally regulated operators such as Kalshi and Polymarket US. Coinbase has also provided event-contract access through a partnership with Kalshi.
State authorities continue to dispute whether federal commodities oversight prevents them from enforcing local gambling rules against some sports-related contracts. Predict.fun’s dashboard announcement did not address that conflict, identify supported US jurisdictions, or announce a US-regulated entity.
The company also did not provide a timetable for taking the REST API out of beta. Its public documentation continues to list endpoints for categories, markets, orders, accounts, positions, search, and OAuth, along with TypeScript and Python authentication guides.
Crypto World
Bitcoin slips below $77.5K as macro pressure offsets ETF inflows
Bitcoin traded near $77,500 on Sept. 1 as rising oil prices, higher bond yields and renewed US rate-hike concerns outweighed strong spot ETF inflows, while short-term technical indicators pointed to weakening momentum.
Summary
- Bitcoin fell 1.6% in 24 hours after retreating from an intraday high near $79,225.
- The 4-hour price reached its lower Bollinger Band as trend strength dropped to a weak reading.
- US spot Bitcoin ETFs recorded $216.7 million in net inflows during the latest completed session.
- Liquidation data show leveraged positions clustered near $76,500–$77,000 and above $79,500.
Bitcoin price loses short-term support
According to data from crypto.news, Bitcoin (BTC) price was trading around $77,500 at the time of writing, down approximately 1.6% over the previous 24 hours. The asset reached $79,225 earlier in the session before sellers pushed it to an intraday low of $77,318.
The retreat took Bitcoin below the $77,700–$78,000 short-term support range and left it about 4.6% below the recent local high near $81,280.
BTC remains well above its main daily moving averages despite the pullback. The daily chart places the 20-day simple moving average at $73,198, while the 50-day and 100-day averages sit at $67,924 and $66,285, respectively.

Bitcoin also remains above the 200-day SMA near $69,504. The alignment leaves the broader trend constructive, as shorter moving averages have moved above their longer-term counterparts following August’s rally.
Daily momentum has started to cool, however. The relative strength index has fallen to 66 from an earlier overbought reading above 70. An RSI above 50 still favors buyers, but the decline suggests the market is losing some momentum after its rapid move from the $64,000 area.
Rising oil prices and yields pressure Bitcoin
The pullback followed renewed pressure across global markets as oil prices and government bond yields moved higher.
Brent crude rose roughly 2% to $92.04 per barrel as renewed fighting between the United States and Iran revived concerns over supply disruptions.
More expensive energy can keep inflation elevated by raising transportation and production costs. Persistent inflation would reduce the Federal Reserve’s room to lower interest rates and could revive expectations for tighter US monetary policy.
A simultaneous global bond selloff pushed yields higher, adding pressure to risk assets. Rising yields make interest-bearing government securities more attractive relative to assets such as Bitcoin, which does not generate a fixed return.
The macro pressure arrived despite renewed demand for US spot Bitcoin exchange-traded funds. Farside Investors data show that the products attracted a combined $216.7 million during the latest completed trading session.
BlackRock’s IBIT accounted for $205.9 million of the total. The daily inflow reversed the $201.9 million net withdrawal recorded on Aug. 28, though Bitcoin’s subsequent decline suggests macro-related selling temporarily exceeded ETF demand.
4-hour indicators point to weak momentum
Bitcoin’s 4-hour chart shows the price testing the lower Bollinger Band at approximately $77,473. The band’s middle line stands near $78,262, while the upper boundary sits at $79,050.

Trading near the lower band reflects immediate selling pressure, but it does not confirm a larger breakdown by itself. A recovery above the middle band would put $79,050 back in focus, while a 4-hour close below the lower boundary could expose the recent lows.
The average directional index has dropped to 12.6 on the same timeframe. An ADX reading below 20 normally indicates that neither buyers nor sellers control a strong trend, making range-bound and uneven price action more likely.
BTC would need to recover the $78,260 Bollinger midpoint before challenging $79,050. Above that level, the $79,500–$80,000 zone represents the next major resistance area, followed by the recent peaks between $80,800 and $81,300.
Failure to recover the middle band would leave Bitcoin vulnerable to another test of $77,000. A confirmed close below that level would weaken the short-term structure even though the daily moving averages remain bullish.
Liquidation clusters surround the current price
CoinGlass’s one-week liquidation heatmap shows a growing concentration of leveraged positions just below Bitcoin’s current market price.

The nearest liquidity cluster appears between approximately $76,500 and $77,000. A larger downside pool is visible closer to $76,000, giving traders two nearby levels to watch if selling accelerates.
Upside liquidity is concentrated around $79,500, with additional clusters between $80,000 and $82,000. Price can gravitate toward areas containing large concentrations of leveraged positions, but the heatmap does not predict which cluster will be reached first.
Derivatives data do not currently point to widespread forced deleveraging. Notably, about $33 million in Bitcoin liquidations, including $19.6 million in long positions and $13.4 million in shorts.
Bitcoin futures open interest stood near $25.3 billion, rising only 0.6%–0.9% over 24 hours. Average funding remained positive at 0.0066% per eight hours, below the commonly referenced 0.01% baseline. The combination suggests leveraged traders remain positioned, but bullish exposure is not yet unusually crowded.
Bitcoin must defend the $76,500 support zone
The $76,500–$77,000 region is Bitcoin’s main immediate support. The lower 4-hour Bollinger Band and a nearby liquidation cluster add technical importance to that range.
A sustained break below $76,500 could extend the decline toward $75,700–$76,000. If buyers fail to defend that secondary area, the daily chart points to $72,500–$73,200 as the next major support, with the 20-day SMA reinforcing the upper end of the zone.
The bullish scenario requires Bitcoin to reclaim $77,700–$78,260 and then close above $79,050. A move through $79,500–$80,000 could trigger liquidations among short positions and reopen the path toward $81,000–$82,000.
Pseudonymous trader Eliz maintained a longer-term bullish view despite the short-term volatility, describing purchases above the $65,000–$68,000 range as a “bargain” and saying Bitcoin would eventually trade higher. The forecast remains the trader’s opinion rather than a confirmed market outcome.
For US investors, oil prices, Treasury yields and expectations for the Federal Reserve’s next policy decision remain the main external catalysts. ETF inflows continue to provide institutional demand, but Bitcoin’s next directional move may depend on whether buyers can defend $76,500 while macro conditions remain restrictive.
Disclosure: This article does not represent investment advice. The content and materials featured on this page are for educational purposes only.
Crypto World
What Trump’s Most-Favored-Nation Deal Means for Drug Prices
Of course, it’s hard to know even how much the deal will save to Medicaid programs, he says. That’s because the terms of the deals are not publicly available, and neither are the prices Medicaid pays.
One research letter in JAMA from July estimated that the most-favored-nation policies from 17 pharmaceutical companies that had already been agreed to would lead to $8.6 billion in savings a year for Medicaid programs.
But those savings are likely only for the short term, says one of that study’s authors, Dr. Thomas Hwang, an assistant professor at Brigham and Women’s Hospital. “Long-term savings are likely illusory,” he says. That’s because evidence suggests that after most-favored-nation deals, companies often raise prices in other countries so that the prices that the U.S. compares its prices to will be higher.
Already, the U.K. has agreed to cover drugs at higher prices than it did previously, says Dr. Suhas Gondi, an instructor at Harvard Medical School. He predicts that pharmaceutical companies will try to game the agreement by deciding not to launch new drugs in some countries so they won’t have to compare prices to that country.
Crypto World
4 Investment Committee Members on the September Setup: Why None Are Selling
Wall Street’s biggest desks turned defensive as September opened. CNBC’s Investment Committee did the opposite. None of its four members plans to sell.
The split comes as stocks enter the month after 27 record closes this year. September is also the weakest month on the calendar.
Why Wall Street Is Buying Protection
Scott Rubner runs equity and equity derivatives strategy at Citadel Securities and came from Goldman Sachs. His August 31 note made three points.
- Earnings are done.
Companies authorized more than $1.1 trillion in buybacks through August. Those buyers go quiet from September 12.
- Retail steps back too.
Rubner’s data shows September has the year’s weakest dip buying. Purchases on down days run near half the normal pace.
- Hedges are cheap.
The VIX closed August at 14.4, its second lowest finish since December 2025.
“Use strength to reduce some exposure and add inexpensive protection into this event window,” he noted.
Others followed, with JPMorgan’s trading desk moving to neutral. Wells Fargo turned cautious on fears that AI spending has peaked.
Both were far more bullish weeks ago, when JPMorgan raised S&P forecasts as hedging demand dried up.
Why the Committee Is Not Selling
- Joe Terranova, Virtus Investment Partners
Momentum fell double digits this quarter while quality rose 1.5%. The market has somewhere to land, he says, so he will not turn bearish yet.
- Stephanie Link, Hightower
She is not trying to time the month. Any dip becomes a chance to add to positions she has been building. Value has beaten growth by 14% this year.
- Jason Snipe, Odyssey Capital Advisors
He calls himself a long-term investor, not a tactical trader. A soft patch is where he adds exposure.
- Josh Brown, Ritholtz Wealth Management
Momentum peaked on June 22 and has fallen 13.7% since. That rotation already happened, he argues. Trading the calendar only creates taxable gains.
Follow us on X to get the latest news as it happens
However, the record is milder than the reputation, because since 1950, September has cost the S&P 500 just 0.6% on average. The month still finished higher 34 times out of 75.
The economy is also holding up. Job openings stayed at 7.3 million in July, the Labor Department reported Tuesday.
Bitcoin (BTC) faces the same test. BTC traded near $77,130 on Tuesday, down over 2% over the last 24 hours. Both markets carry a weak September seasonality record.
The desks are paying for insurance. The committee is waiting for the sale.
The post 4 Investment Committee Members on the September Setup: Why None Are Selling appeared first on BeInCrypto.
Crypto World
Wall Street Stock Records Could Move On-Chain. One Trader Punished for Deleting His
The US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) proposed new transfer agent rules on Tuesday. A blockchain could become the official record of who owns a share.
The same day, the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) settled with a swaps trader. He had erased messages regulators ordered him to keep. Both actions turn on what counts as an official record.
Stock Records On-Chain Depend on One Obscure Firm
Transfer agents sit behind every public company share. They keep the master securityholder file, which is the issuer’s legal list of who owns what; they also route dividends and process transfers.
Washington has not rewritten those rules since the early 1980s, but Tuesday’s package amends existing rules and forms, rescinds one rule, and adds several new ones. Commissioner Hester Peirce said on X (twitter) that the proposal took more than a decade.
Follow us on X to get the latest news as it happens
Chairman Paul Atkins tied the update to technology the industry already uses.
“This proposal would streamline and modernize the Commission’s rules to reflect transfer agents’ current processes and operations, including the use of electronic communications and blockchain technology in connection with securities offerings and the transfer of shares,” read an excerpt in the announcement, citing Atkins.
That line decides whether a token is a share or a wrapper around one. A transfer only carries legal weight when the chain feeds the official file. Meanwhile the tokenization ownership gap has widened while the rules stood still.
Securitize, Computershare, and Equiniti have already moved for the work, BeInCrypto’s transfer agent guide explains. Registrars would also disclose which securities they tokenize and which networks host them.
A $90,000 Penalty for Messages That Vanished
Elsewhere, the CFTC closed the opposite kind of case. A federal court in Manhattan entered a consent order against John Patrick Gorman III. He is a US dollar swaps trader and a managing director at a global investment bank.
Enforcement staff told Gorman in March 2019 to preserve documents. He deleted WhatsApp threads and one text message instead.
Two months on, he wrote to the agency claiming he had destroyed nothing. He repeated that account under testimony in November 2019.
“Attempts to impede or obstruct the Commission’s investigations go to the very heart of the division’s ability to detect wrongdoing and enforce the law,” the CFTC said in its release, citing David Miller, the agency’s enforcement director.
The order fines Gorman $90,000 and permanently bars him from repeating the conduct. Regulators still rely on what a trader chooses to keep, which is the weakness a shared ledger removes.
The post Wall Street Stock Records Could Move On-Chain. One Trader Punished for Deleting His appeared first on BeInCrypto.
Crypto World
SEC proposes transfer agent rule, sets event to figure out round-the-clock U.S. trading

The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission issued an agenda for its 24-trading roundtable and proposed a new transfer-agent rule with blockchain implications.
-
Fashion4 days agoWeekend Open Thread: Maeve – Corporette.com
-
Crypto World5 days agoBitcoin’s 22% rally now needs real demand to outlast Treasury liquidity boost
-
Crypto World7 days agoWarsh Jackson Hole keynote puts financial innovation first
-
Business5 days agoApple Confirms September 9 Keynote and Reveals Its Full Pre-Order Schedule
-
Crypto World6 days agoElon Musk Grok Bot Promise: We Will Make You Whole if AI Loses Your Money
-
Business5 days agoSalesforce Stock Soars 19% as Blowout Earnings and Agentforce AI Growth Silence Software Skeptics
-
Crypto World7 days agoDid Trump Just Move SpaceX Stock With One Truth Social Post?
-
Business4 days agoOnto Innovation Stock: AI’s Next Bottleneck Is Yield (NYSE:ONTO)
-
NewsBeat6 days agoLindsay Clancy jury braces for closing arguments as judge tells court: ‘You’ve heard all the evidence’ – Live updates
-
Business7 days agoWalmart takes aim at younger shoppers with new fashion brand
-
Crypto World6 days agoNVIDIA revenue hits $96.2B as AI demand doubles
-
Crypto World4 days agoBitcoin price tests $82K resistance as Brandt stays long
-
Business4 days agoiPhone 18 Pro Pre-Orders Could Shift to Saturday as Apple Reportedly Avoids September 11 Anniversary
-
Crypto World6 days agoNvidia Q2 Earnings Reveal $96.2 Billion Beat, So Why Is NVDA Falling?
-
Tech3 days agoHugging Face built a $4.5 billion empire on free AI models. Now Nvidia is buying it for $12.9 billion
-
Tech6 days agoClaude Cowork gets its own browser that doesn’t touch your tabs, bookmarks, or saved passwords
-
Crypto World5 days agoTruflation calls for Fed rate cut after PCE forecast
-
Tech4 days agoPaperCut releases second emergency patch for exploited flaws
-
Sports7 days agoSV 07 Elversberg 2026/27 season preview: Transfers, pre-season, predicted lineup & predictions
-
Tech6 days agoApple’s iPhone 18 Pro event is on September 9

You must be logged in to post a comment Login