Crypto World
Bitcoin Traders Say Watch These BTC Price Levels Next
Bitcoin (BTC) analysts mapped out the key BTC price levels to watch as the market’s focus shifted to the $58,000 to $65,000 zone as the last line of defense.
Bitcoin price is wedged between two key levels
Bitcoin is currently wedged between the 200-week simple moving average (SMA) at $68,300 and the 200-week exponential moving average (EMA) at $58,400.
Generally, in Bitcoin’s trading history, major BTC bottoms have formed between the 200-week SMA and EMA, according to analyst Jelle. This suggests that Bitcoin is possibly forming a bottom between these trendlines.
Related: Bitcoin accumulation wave puts $80K back in play: Analyst
While Bitcoin has produced a weekly close above the 200-week EMA for the second week in a row, “this doesn’t mean it is now in the clear,” trader and analyst Rekt Capital said in a Monday X post, adding:
“The absence of any meaningful upside from here going forward, there is a risk that BTC loses the 200-week EMA in time, triggering additional downside.”
Crypto investor and entrepreneur Ted Pillows had an expanded view, focusing on $71,000 for a bullish breakout.
In a Tuesday post on X, Ted Pillows said that Bitcoin needs a daily close above the $71,000 level to increase the chances of an upside rally, adding:
“And if a breakdown happens below $66,000, BTC might revisit $60,000.”
Cointelegraph reported that the CME gap between $80,000 and $84,000 could act as a magnet, representing the upper price target for Bitcoin. With nine out of 10 CME gaps filled since August 2025, the $80,000–$84,000 range stands out as the key level to watch on the upside.
Bitcoin bulls must hold the price above $65,000
After turning away from $72,000 last week, Bitcoin found support at $65,000. Glassnode’s cost basis distribution heatmap reveals a significant support area recently established between $63,000 to $65,000, where long-term holders recently acquired approximately 372,240 BTC.
A decisive break below this level “would likely open the path toward the realized Price” around $55,000, Glassnode said in a Monday post on X.
Current analysis suggests that the bears may aim to hold BTC price below $65,000 to remain in control. If they succeed, the BTC/USDT pair may then retest the critical $60,000 level. If the $60,000 support cracks, the next stop is likely to be $52,500.
This article does not contain investment advice or recommendations. Every investment and trading move involves risk, and readers should conduct their own research when making a decision. While we strive to provide accurate and timely information, Cointelegraph does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of any information in this article. This article may contain forward-looking statements that are subject to risks and uncertainties. Cointelegraph will not be liable for any loss or damage arising from your reliance on this information.
TLDR
- Senate Banking Committee approval before April’s end is critical, or the CLARITY Act’s 2026 passage probability plummets
- Prediction markets show declining confidence: Polymarket at 56% (down 9 points), Kalshi at merely 30% by June
- Central controversy revolves around permitting stablecoin issuers to distribute yield to holders
- Coinbase withdrew endorsement in January, asserting a flawed bill is worse than no legislation
- Gnosis co-founder cautions the legislation might consolidate crypto control among centralized entities
Time is running short for the CLARITY Act, America’s proposed cryptocurrency market structure legislation. According to Galaxy Research head Alex Thorn, the bill requires Senate floor consideration by early May to maintain viable 2026 passage prospects. This necessitates Senate Banking Committee clearance before April concludes.
Senate Majority Leader John Thune has publicly acknowledged the April timeline appears unrealistic. Current Senate priorities center on the SAVE America Act, relegating the CLARITY Act to secondary status on the legislative calendar.
According to Thorn, each day of postponement reduces available time for floor consideration. Without committee approval during April, he characterized 2026 passage prospects as “extremely low.”
Prediction platforms mirror this growing skepticism. Polymarket indicates the legislation’s 2026 enactment probability has declined 9 percentage points to 56%. Kalshi demonstrates greater pessimism, calculating 30% likelihood before June and merely 7% before May.
Stablecoin Yield Remains Central Flashpoint
The most contentious issue involves stablecoin yield distribution. The controversy focuses on whether stablecoin issuers should possess authority to pass interest earnings to users.
Representative French Hill stated that prohibiting stablecoin yield represents a non-negotiable requirement for Senate advancement. Traditional banking institutions contend that interest-bearing stablecoins would divert deposits from regulated financial entities.
Cryptocurrency firms counter that reward-bearing stablecoins enhance payment utility. Coinbase retracted support during January. CEO Brian Armstrong argued the current draft undermines decentralized finance, prohibits stablecoin yield, and restricts tokenized real-world assets. “We’d rather have no bill than a bad bill,” he declared.
Senator Angela Alsobrooks suggested compromise from both factions may prove necessary. White House crypto adviser and Coinbase CLO Paul Grewal also condemned banks for impeding progress.
DeFi and Regulatory Turf Wars Still Unresolved
Thorn suggested the stablecoin controversy may not represent the final hurdle. He identified outstanding questions regarding decentralized finance regulation, developer liability protections, and SEC-CFTC jurisdictional boundaries.
Attorney Jake Chervinsky noted that banking institutions also express concern about stablecoin liquidity migrating toward DeFi platforms, beyond just yield distribution issues.
Gnosis co-founder Dr. Friederike Ernst cautioned the bill’s present framework threatens to channel all cryptocurrency activity through licensed intermediaries. She expressed concern this could consolidate crypto infrastructure control among a limited group of major institutions.
Ernst acknowledged the legislation includes positive elements, such as safeguarding peer-to-peer transactions and self-custody rights, plus defining SEC and CFTC regulatory boundaries.
Senator Bernie Moreno expressed continued optimism for April passage and presidential signature. Thorn indicated that schedule now appears increasingly unrealistic.
The week could prove pivotal for markets, including bitcoin , with the U.S. Federal Reserve among seven major central banks set to announce interest-rate decisions while war-driven oil price gains threaten to reignite inflation in the global economy.
Most of the central banks are expected to keep interest rates steady, but hawkish comments from policymakers, driven by inflation concerns, could trigger downside volatility across risk assets.
While reflationary environments have historically supported bitcoin, rising inflation expectations are pushing bond yields higher and tightening financial conditions, André Dragosch, European head of research at Bitwise, told CoinDesk. Those conditions generally make riskier investments less attractive.
Still, geopolitical tensions are currently dominating the market backdrop, according to Dragosch. Historically, such shocks tend to fade quickly, and bitcoin has often delivered above-average returns after periods of elevated geopolitical risk.
“Investors should generally fade these kinds of events and view them as short-term buying opportunities,” Dragosch said.
Bitcoin is trading at what Dragosch called the “biggest macro discount” on record, with sentiment near FTX-collapse lows. “We are probably closer to the bottom than the top,” he said.
What to Watch
(All times ET)
- Crypto
- March 17: Lava Network (LAVA) to expand with 17 new chain integrations and nine new blockchain ecosystems.
- March 19: Walrus (WAL) final deadline for Tusky users to migrate their data.
- March 23: Backpack token generation event occurs, with 250 million tokens (25% of total supply) to be distributed.
- Macro
- March 16, 8:30 a.m.: Canada consumer price index (CPI) YoY for February (Prev. 2.3%)
- March 17, 4:30 a.m.: Reserve Bank of Australia interest rate decision est. 4.1% (Prev. 3.85%)
- March 17, 10:00 a.m.: U.S. Pending Home Sales MoM for February (Prev. -0.8%)
- March 18, 6 a.m.: Eurozone consumer price index (CPI) for February. MoM est. 0.7% (Prev. -0.6%); YoY est. 1.9% (Prev. 1.7%)
- March 18, 8:30 a.m.: U.S. PPI for February. YoY est. 3.7% (Prev. 3.6%); Core PPI YoY est. 3.2% (Prev. 3.6%)
- March 18, 9:45 a.m.: Bank of Canada interest rate decision Est. 2.25% (Prev. 2.25%)
- March 18, 10:00 a.m.: U.S. Factory Orders MoM for January (Prev. -0.7%)
- March 18, 2:00 p.m.: Fed interest rate decision Est. 3.50%-3.75% (Prev. 3.50%-3.75%); FOMC economic projections
- March 18, 2:30 p.m.: Fed Chair press conference
- March 18, 5:30 p.m.: Central Bank of Brazil Selic rate decision Est. 14.50% (Prev. 15%)
- March 18, 11 p.m.: Bank of Japan interest rate decision Est. 0.75% (Prev. 0.75%)
- March 19, 4:30 a.m.: Swiss National Bank interest rate decision Est. 0% (Prev. 0%)
- March 19, 8 a.m.: Bank of England interest rate decision Est. 3.75% (Prev. 3.75%).
- March 19, 8:30 a.m.: U.S. Initial Jobless Claims for week ending March 14 Est. 215K (Prev. 213K)
- March 19, 8:30 a.m.: U.S. Philadelphia Fed Manufacturing Index for March (Prev. 16.3)
- March 19, 9:15 a.m.: ECB interest rate decision for main refinancing rate Est. 2.15% Prev. 2.15%
- March 19, 4:30 p.m.: Fed Balance Sheet for week ending March 18 (Prev. $6.65T)
- March 20, 8:30 a.m.: Canada PPI YoY (Prev. 5.4%); MoM (Prev. 2.7%)
Earnings (Estimates based on FactSet data)
- March 16: Bakkt Holdings (BKKT), post-market, -$0.47
- March 16: Bitcoin Depot (BTM), pre-market, -$0.47
- March 16: Cango (CANG), post-market, -$0.34
- March 17: CEA Industries (BNC), post-market, $0.69
- March 18: Bitfarms (BITF), pre-market, -$0.03
- March 19: Gemini Space Station (GEMI), post-market, -$0.91
- March 20: BitFuFu (FUFU), pre-market, $0.01
Token Events
- Governance votes & calls
- March 17: Mantle (MNT) to host State of Mind Ep. 07, discussing CeDeFi milestones and DeFi strategies.
- March 18: Jupiter (JUP) to hold its weekly Planetary Call community session with team updates.
- March 18: head of marketing & PR to discuss ecosystem updates.
- Decentraland DAO is voting on whether to allow registered users to customize the color of their avatar name tag and to add a more accessible volume slider to the UI sidebar. Voting ends March 16 and 17.
- Convex Finance is voting on Curve and Frax gauge weight allocations for the week of March 12, directing vlCVX voting power across hundreds of liquidity pools. It’s also voting on FXN gauge weight allocations for the same period. Voting ends March 17.
- Aavegotchi DAO is voting to finalize its 2026–2027 multisig signers election, preserving the 5-of-9 threshold and setting quarterly signer compensation. Voting ends March 17.
- Aavegotchi DAO is running Ballot 3 to elect seven of the remaining 10 nominees as multi-sig signers, completing the nine-signer roster for the DAO Foundation wallet. Voting ends March 17.
- Aura Finance is voting on Balancer gauge weight allocations for the week of March 12, directing vlAURA voting power across Balancer pools on Ethereum, Arbitrum, Optimism, Gnosis, Base and Avalanche. Voting ends March 17.
- ShapeShift DAO is voting on establishing and funding a new International UX workstream for six months to maintain professional multilingual translations of the ShapeShift app and website. Voting ends March 17.
- WalletConnect Network is voting on allocating 50 million WCT tokens as a dedicated rewards budget for WalletConnect Pay in 2026. Voting ends March 18.
- ENS is voting on a one-time transfer of 900,000 USDC from the ENS Endowment to wallet.ensdao.eth to cover a shortfall in stream payments owed to ENS Labs. Voting ends March 18.
- Cratos DAO is voting on extending the current mobile app reward standard deadline by one month to April 30, 2026. Voting ends March 19.
- Lightchain AI DAO is voting on a temporary 90-day team authority proposal, which grants the core team temporary operational authority for 90 days to make day-to-day and strategic decisions. Voting ends March 22.
- Unlocks
- March 16: Arbitrum (ARB) to unlock 1.78% of its circulating supply worth $9.65 million.
- March 20: LayerZero (ZRO) to unlock 5.64% of its circulating supply worth $52.45 million.
- Token Launches
Conferences
TLDR
- On March 15, Robert Kiyosaki issued warnings about an intensifying financial “giant crash”
- The author highlighted panic in private credit markets and distress among leading banks
- Kiyosaki deployed millions to acquire oil assets, precious metals, Bitcoin, and Ethereum
- He contrasted his investment strategy with Warren Buffett’s cash-heavy approach
- The financial educator forecasts higher valuations for gold, silver, and Bitcoin post-crash
The bestselling author of Rich Dad Poor Dad, Robert Kiyosaki, issued fresh concerns on March 15 about an escalating financial crisis. His warnings focused on turbulence in private credit markets and mounting pressure on established banking institutions.
“Crash accelerates,” he wrote on X. “Private credit funds are panicked as investors withdraw their money. Major big-name banks and brand-name financial institutions are in trouble.”
Kiyosaki also referenced economist Jim Rickards, noting that he has officially proclaimed the United States has entered a “New Depression.”
In response to these conditions, Kiyosaki revealed he deployed millions of dollars in capital last week. His purchases included additional oil wells, precious metals, and cryptocurrency holdings.
“Last week I took millions in cash and purchased more oil wells, more gold, silver, and bitcoin,” he wrote.
The financial educator confirmed he’s also accumulating Ethereum as part of his diversified acquisition strategy.
Kiyosaki referenced Warren Buffett’s well-known cash accumulation strategy, recognizing it as a tactical approach to maintain liquidity and acquire undervalued assets when markets decline.
Kiyosaki vs. Buffett: Two Different Crash Strategies
Buffett’s company, Berkshire Hathaway, has been building its cash position for some time. Kiyosaki acknowledged the logic, saying “Cash is not trash in a crash.”
However, Kiyosaki emphasized that his investment philosophy differs fundamentally. Rather than stockpiling currency, he’s converting it into tangible assets.
“I doubt Warren Buffett would do what I do,” he wrote.
For investors lacking a clear strategy, Kiyosaki provided straightforward guidance. He suggested that remaining on the sidelines might be the wisest choice during market turbulence for those without a defined plan.
The author also highlighted Middle East geopolitical instability as an influencing factor. He noted that persistent attacks on oil tankers navigating the Strait of Hormuz are elevating crude prices, which directly benefits his Texas-based oil well investments.
Why Kiyosaki Keeps Buying Bitcoin
Kiyosaki has maintained a vocal stance on Bitcoin acquisitions for multiple years. He consistently categorizes it alongside precious metals as a “real asset” due to its mathematically limited supply of 21 million coins.
He has repeatedly stated his conviction that Bitcoin represents a superior investment compared to gold. Market corrections, according to him, present optimal opportunities to expand holdings.
His Bitcoin-related statements have attracted scrutiny for apparent contradictions. One post claimed he never purchased Bitcoin above $6,000, while subsequent posts documented purchases at significantly elevated price levels.
Regardless of the debates, he continues to publicly endorse Bitcoin and Ethereum as fundamental components of his investment approach.
Kiyosaki maintains his belief that valuations for gold, silver, and Bitcoin will surge following a substantial market crash. While acknowledging his predictions could prove incorrect, he expresses strong confidence in his current positions.
The financial author initially forecast his “giant crash” scenario in his 2013 publication Rich Dad’s Prophecy. His warnings have intensified in frequency as 2026 approaches.
Australia’s Senate Economics Legislation Committee has backed a bill that would require crypto exchanges and tokenization platforms to comply with the country’s existing financial services regime, recommending that the Corporations Amendment (Digital Assets Framework) Bill 2025 be passed.
The move on March 16 brings Australia a step closer to a bespoke licensing framework for “digital asset platforms” (DAPs) and “tokenised custody platforms” (TCPs), aimed at closing gaps in oversight of platforms that hold customer assets following the collapses of high‑profile digital asset businesses, such as FTX.
The bill, first introduced by Assistant Treasurer and Financial Services Minister Daniel Mulino in November 2025, would treat DAPs and TCPs as financial products under the Corporations Act and Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) Act, pushing most centralized exchanges and tokenized custody businesses that hold client assets into the Australian Financial Services Licence regime.
Related: Ripple targets April for Australian financial license via acquisition
Licensed platforms must meet ASIC-set custody and settlement standards, comply with tailored disclosure rules for retail clients, and operate under platform‑specific conduct and governance requirements, while small providers with annual transaction thresholds under 10 million Australian dollars ($7 million) and some public blockchain infrastructure are exempt.
Industry groups warnings around terminology
Industry groups cited in the report, such as law firm Piper Alderman, warned that the broad “digital token” and “factual control” tests could inadvertently include wallet software and infrastructure providers in non-unilateral-control setups, including common multi‑party computation (MPC) configurations.
US blockchain firm Ripple Labs backed “control” as the “appropriate nexus” for the regulatory perimeter, but argued that the bill needed to better accommodate modern security architectures such as MPC wallets.
It warned that, on a strict reading of the “factual control” test, technology‑only providers holding a single key shard could be misclassified as regulated custodians, and urged lawmakers to clarify that an entity does not exercise factual control unless it can unilaterally transfer an asset without the client’s cooperation.
Related: Australia warns of AI, ‘finfluencers’ as Gen Z crypto ownership reaches 23%
The committee acknowledged these concerns, but sided with Treasury’s plan to refine the perimeter through future regulations rather than rewriting the core definitions.
Coinbase hails progress but warns on debanking risk
In an email statement to Cointelegraph, Coinbase Australia director and APAC managing director John O’Loghlen welcomed the recommendation as “an important step for Australia’s standing in the global digital economy.” He argued that the country had the capital and talent to lead in digital assets, but still needed clear rules to unlock that potential.
O’Loghlen also warned that “the anti-competitive practice of debanking is rampant despite the government endorsing measures to address it back in 2022,” and urged Canberra to prioritize implementing the Council of Financial Regulators’ recommendations.
With the committee’s backing in hand, the bill now moves to the Senate for debate and a final vote at a later date.
Magazine: 6 weirdest devices people have used to mine Bitcoin and crypto
Key Highlights
- The digital asset cleared the critical $1.426 resistance barrier for the first time since the beginning of 2026 following an extended period of sideways price action.
- Price surged from approximately $1.41 to $1.47 within 24 hours, accompanied by a volume increase exceeding 250%.
- The token is currently maintaining levels above $1.4550 and the 100-hour Simple Moving Average, with immediate targets identified near $1.48–$1.50.
- Real-world asset tokenization on the XRP Ledger continues expanding, with commodity tokens nearing $1.14 billion in total value.
- Maintaining support above the $1.43–$1.44 zone could open the door for further advances toward $1.50 and possibly $1.55.
On March 16, 2026, XRP finally broke free from a stubborn resistance level that had confined price action for several months during the early part of 2026.
The cryptocurrency rallied from the $1.41 region to reach an intraday peak of $1.4798 during the most recent trading session. Volume activity exploded by more than 250% as the breakout unfolded, with approximately 170 million tokens traded at peak levels.
Price action is currently stabilizing just above the $1.4550 level, maintaining its position over the 100-hour Simple Moving Average.
The pivotal barrier that finally broke was positioned at $1.426—a level that had repeatedly rejected upward momentum during multiple rally attempts in recent months. After clearing this threshold on robust volume, the asset rapidly advanced toward the $1.47 zone.
Near-term technical analysis reveals a pattern of ascending lows developing post-breakout. This formation indicates buying pressure is attempting to establish the previous resistance area as fresh support.
Rising Activity on the XRP Ledger
The price breakthrough doesn’t seem to correlate with any specific XRP-related news event. That said, on-chain activity across the XRP Ledger has been steadily increasing.
Tokenization of real-world assets on the network has shown continuous growth. Commodity-backed tokens on the XRP Ledger climbed toward $1.14 billion in valuation during 2026’s opening quarter.
Critical Price Zones Under Observation
XRP now confronts its next resistance barrier in the $1.48 to $1.50 range. Historical price action shows that rallies have encountered difficulty in this zone, making a decisive move beyond $1.50 particularly significant.
Should the asset successfully breach $1.50, market participants are eyeing subsequent targets at $1.5250 and $1.5320. Continued strength could drive price action into the $1.55 territory.
For downside protection, the essential support zone lies between $1.43 and $1.44. This represents the breakout level, and maintaining these prices is crucial for validating the current upward movement.
A decline beneath $1.4325 would mark a 50% Fibonacci retracement of the entire move from $1.3855 to $1.4798. Further weakness could find support around $1.410, with the primary demand zone located near $1.3680.
Currently, XRP is holding above $1.4550 with the 100-hour Simple Moving Average providing immediate support.
TLDR
- SOL has climbed to the $92–$93 range, posting gains of approximately 4–5% daily following a 13% weekly increase.
- Institutional demand persists with SOL-focused ETFs recording $10.70 million in net weekly capital inflows.
- Futures Open Interest surged more than 7% within 24 hours to reach $5.57 billion, accompanied by $14.43 million in bear position liquidations.
- The 50-day EMA at $94.17 represents immediate technical resistance, with the 100-day EMA at $109.58 serving as the subsequent upside target.
- Real-world asset tokenization on the Solana network has expanded to approximately $873 million, based on Bitwise data.
Solana is demonstrating a notable rebound following its steep correction from the January 2026 high near $295. The digital asset has accumulated approximately 13% in gains throughout the past seven days and currently hovers within the $92–$93 price zone.
Exchange-traded funds dedicated to SOL accumulated $7.60 million in a single trading session on Friday, elevating the seven-day aggregate to $10.70 million. This sustained capital influx demonstrates persistent institutional appetite despite the recent downward pressure on prices.
Within the derivatives market, futures Open Interest experienced an upward movement exceeding 7% over a 24-hour period, reaching $5.57 billion. Bearish traders absorbed substantial losses, with short liquidations accounting for $14.43 million of the total $15.50 million in forced position closures.
The present trading level remains marginally beneath the 50-day Exponential Moving Average positioned at $94.17. Successfully closing above this threshold on a daily timeframe could establish momentum toward the 100-day EMA target of $109.58.
Technical momentum signals are exhibiting bullish tendencies. The MACD indicator has crossed into positive territory while the RSI registers at 58, positioned above neutral levels.
Real-World Asset Growth Supports Solana’s Case
Among the most compelling narratives supporting SOL’s price recovery is the expansion of tokenized real-world assets on its blockchain infrastructure. Bitwise research indicates that RWAs on Solana have reached approximately $873 million in valuation, spanning on-chain treasury products, private credit instruments, and yield-generating assets.
Spot-based Solana ETFs, which received regulatory approval in late 2025, have maintained capital attraction even throughout periods of adverse price movement. These investment vehicles provide traditional financial market participants with SOL exposure without the complexities of direct cryptocurrency custody.
Blockchain metrics corroborate this institutional interest. Active wallet addresses have exceeded the 5 million threshold while daily transaction volume approaches 87 million.
Network and Supply Context
The Solana validator network has expanded to encompass more than 2,000 validators according to certain estimates, though the count of active validators may be closer to 795. The Solana Foundation’s proportion of staked SOL tokens has declined substantially from above 40% in 2020 to below 6% by late 2025.
The network operates with an annual inflation rate of approximately 4%. Roughly 67% of SOL tokens remain staked, effectively constraining the freely circulating supply available for trading.
Funding rates across perpetual swap contracts remain relatively neutral to marginally negative at approximately −0.0095% daily. This metric indicates that leveraged long positions have not yet entered an aggressive accumulation phase.
Immediate downside support is identified within the $76–$80 range. Significant overhead resistance persists near $245–$250, corresponding to the January peak formation.
Presently, SOL exchanges hands at approximately $92–$93 with the 50-day EMA at $94.17 functioning as the immediate technical barrier.
Key Points
- Institutional crypto platform BlockFills declared Chapter 11 bankruptcy in Delaware on March 15, 2026
- Assets valued at $50M–$100M were reported against debts ranging from $100M–$500M
- Customer withdrawals were halted in February following approximately $75 million in losses
- A federal court issued an order freezing 70.6 Bitcoin connected to BlockFills after Dominion Capital filed suit
- Co-founder Nicholas Hammer resigned as CEO; Joseph Perry assumed the interim leadership position
On March 15, 2026, BlockFills—a Chicago-based institutional cryptocurrency trading and lending platform—submitted Chapter 11 bankruptcy documents to the US Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware.
Reliz Ltd., the platform’s primary operating entity, initiated the bankruptcy alongside three related companies. The documentation revealed assets valued between $50 million and $100 million, while liabilities ranged from $100 million to $500 million.
As an institutional service provider, BlockFills offers liquidity solutions, financing options, and risk-management tools to professional clients such as hedge funds, asset management firms, and cryptocurrency mining operations. According to company data, the platform facilitated over $60 billion in transaction volume throughout 2025—representing a 28% increase compared to the previous year.
The platform maintains a client base of approximately 2,000 institutional investors and has received backing from notable investors including Susquehanna Private Equity Investments, CME Ventures, and Nexo Inc.
In February, BlockFills announced the suspension of both customer deposits and withdrawals, attributing the decision to worsening market conditions. Company representatives stated the pause was necessary to safeguard the business and client interests while working toward restoring adequate liquidity.
According to CoinDesk’s reporting, the platform had suffered losses totaling roughly $75 million and had actively pursued acquisition offers or emergency capital injection prior to the bankruptcy declaration.
Bitcoin’s significant price decline appears to have contributed substantially to the firm’s financial difficulties. The leading cryptocurrency plummeted from above $97,000 to below $64,000 during the period spanning mid-January through early February 2026.
Court Actions Intensified Financial Strain
In early March, a US court issued an order freezing 70.6 Bitcoin associated with BlockFills operations. This action followed litigation initiated by Dominion Capital, a client alleging misappropriation of customer assets and improper commingling of funds.
Dominion Capital’s complaint asserted that BlockFills leadership had repeatedly acknowledged possessing a balance sheet deficit and improperly mixing client assets.
A federal judge additionally granted a temporary restraining order against the platform in response to Dominion Capital’s lawsuit. The court mandated a comprehensive accounting of all customer funds as part of the ongoing legal proceedings.
The Financial Times published a report on March 6 indicating that BlockFills had begun preparing for restructuring proceedings and was actively consulting with legal and advisory professionals.
Executive Transition Amid Crisis
Co-founder and chief executive Nicholas Hammer vacated his leadership position during the unfolding crisis. Joseph Perry accepted the appointment as interim chief executive officer.
In BlockFills’ official announcement, the company characterized the Chapter 11 filing as the “most responsible path forward” following extensive discussions with investors, clients, and creditors.
Management indicated the bankruptcy process would provide necessary time to stabilize operations, secure additional liquidity sources, and evaluate potential strategic alternatives or transactions.
The BlockFills bankruptcy echoes the 2022 cryptocurrency lending sector collapse, which saw major platforms including Celsius, Voyager Digital, BlockFi, and Genesis all declare bankruptcy following severe market corrections.
Joseph Perry currently oversees the company as it navigates the court-supervised restructuring proceedings.
The updates were introduced on Pi Day 2026 – March 14.
After a few consecutive days of dropping hard following a major fake-out rally, PI’s price has finally turned green in the past day, challenging the coveted $0.20 level.
The reasons behind today’s bounce could be attributed to the overall market resurgence, but also the new updates announced by the Core Team during the weekend.
PI Price Bounces
Pi Network’s native token was perhaps the most volatile altcoin in the past week, which, for the most part, was going well for the asset. At one point, it registered a massive 30% surge on Friday morning, skyrocketing to almost $0.30, which became a five-month peak. This came after the veteran US exchange Kraken said it would list PI for trading.
At the time, the token had added more than 100% since its February all-time low of $0.1312. However, the bears were quick to intervene and didn’t allow any further gains. Just the opposite; PI nosedived on Saturday morning with double-digits and plummeted toward $0.20. It slipped below that level on Sunday as most of the crypto market was retracing.
However, it has rebounded to just north of that coveted line as of now after a 4% daily increase. While this price jump could be linked to the gains registered by the broader crypto market today, it could also be a direct response to the recent ecosystem developments.
Pi Day and Updates
In the weeks leading up to PI’s big breakout attempt, the Core Team behind the project announced a few key updates that ultimately upgraded the protocol to v19.9. The next one, v20.2, was expected by March 12. More importantly for the community, perhaps, was March 14 – known as Pi Day due to its resemblance to the mathematical constant π (3,14).
With its announcement, the team outlined several key updates, including the successful migration to v20.2. The Pi Launchpad was also released on Testnet, which is still available only through the Pi Browser. It aims to introduce a new ecosystem token model focused on product utility and user acquisition.
You may also like:
The initial version of the Pi Launchpad has been released as a Pi App on the Testnet with a test token! Because the Launchpad introduces new concepts for many Pioneers and uses mechanisms that differ from typical token launches in Web3, it is being introduced on Testnet first so…
— Pi Network (@PiCoreTeam) March 16, 2026
The other developments were the start of the second Mainnet migrations, the release of the first round of KYC validator rewards, and the integration of Pi payments in the Pi App Studio.
Binance Free $600 (CryptoPotato Exclusive): Use this link to register a new account and receive $600 exclusive welcome offer on Binance (full details).
LIMITED OFFER for CryptoPotato readers at Bybit: Use this link to register and open a $500 FREE position on any coin!
Disclaimer: Information found on CryptoPotato is those of writers quoted. It does not represent the opinions of CryptoPotato on whether to buy, sell, or hold any investments. You are advised to conduct your own research before making any investment decisions. Use provided information at your own risk. See Disclaimer for more information.
Key Highlights
- Bitcoin surpassed $74,000 after multiple unsuccessful attempts at breaking this resistance level
- Altcoins showed strong performance with Ether up 14.3% weekly and Solana gaining 12%
- Short sellers suffered massive losses totaling $344 million, with $284.9 million from short positions alone
- Commercial shipping resumed through the Strait of Hormuz as US-Iran tensions showed signs of de-escalation
- Traditional markets responded positively with S&P 500 and Nasdaq futures rising approximately 0.5% each
The leading cryptocurrency finally pushed past a critical price point that had rejected advances on four separate occasions over the previous two weeks. [[LINK_START_3]]Bitcoin[[LINK_END_3]] was changing hands slightly above $74,000 during Monday morning trading, representing a 2.9% increase over 24 hours and a weekly gain of 9.7%.
The second-largest cryptocurrency by market capitalization, Ether, advanced 7.7% during the session and posted a weekly increase of 14.3%, reaching $2,261. Solana demonstrated similar strength with a 5.6% daily gain and 12% weekly advance to $93, marking its best seven-day performance in several months.
The rally extended across the broader digital asset market. Dogecoin touched the $0.10 level for the first time since early March, climbing 4.6% on the day and 10.6% for the week. BNB advanced 3.8% to reach $683, while XRP posted a 4.2% gain to $1.47.
A significant factor behind the price surge was forced liquidation of bearish positions. According to CoinGlass tracking data, $344 million worth of positions were liquidated across 91,978 traders during the previous 24-hour period. Bearish bets accounted for $284.9 million of these liquidations, representing approximately 83% of the total. Ether short positions suffered the most severe losses at $127.9 million, with Bitcoin shorts losing $124.5 million and Solana shorts giving up $18.5 million. A single Bitcoin short position on Bitfinex worth $6.94 million represented the largest individual liquidation.
Hormuz Strait Situation Shows Improvement
Global economic conditions experienced a notable shift during the weekend period. President Trump announced ongoing diplomatic communications with Iran, although Iranian officials disputed any requests for ceasefire negotiations. Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi clarified that the Strait of Hormuz remained closed exclusively to vessels from “enemies,” representing a softening from the complete blockade implemented when hostilities commenced.
Two vessels transporting liquefied petroleum gas destined for India successfully navigated through the strait on Sunday, marking the first commercial passage since the conflict’s outbreak.
Oil prices adjusted accordingly. Brent crude was trading near $104 after previously touching $106.50 following American military strikes on Kharg Island, Iran’s primary petroleum export facility. West Texas Intermediate fell beneath the $100 threshold. The US dollar index declined 0.3%.
The combination of declining oil prices and dollar weakness created favorable conditions for speculative assets. Reduced energy costs and a softer dollar typically enhance liquidity dynamics for digital currencies and similar risk-oriented investments.
Equity Markets Gain Ahead of Federal Reserve Decision
Traditional equity index futures posted gains during Monday’s session. Contracts linked to the Dow Jones Industrial Average climbed 0.4%. Both S&P 500 and Nasdaq 100 futures advanced approximately 0.5%. These gains would represent the first positive trading day following five consecutive sessions of declines. The S&P 500 concluded the previous week at levels not seen since November.
Market participants are focused on two major developments scheduled for this week. Nvidia’s yearly GTC conference commenced Monday featuring a presentation from CEO Jensen Huang. Additionally, the Federal Reserve’s March 17-18 monetary policy gathering is approaching.
Market consensus anticipates the Fed will maintain current interest rate levels. However, the updated economic projections and Fed Chair Jerome Powell’s Wednesday press briefing will be crucial in determining market expectations for potential rate reductions later this year. Persistently high oil prices could present challenges to the inflation narrative as policymakers deliberate.
The superior performance of alternative cryptocurrencies deserves attention. Historical patterns suggest that when Ether outpaces Bitcoin by more than four percentage points during a weekly period, it often indicates expanding risk appetite throughout the market rather than defensive positioning into the dominant digital asset.
A renewed debate is growing over whether a sustained pivot from Bitcoin (CRYPTO: BTC) miners toward artificial intelligence could impact the network’s security and its role as a store of value. On one side, energy and capital are increasingly chasing higher returns in AI compute, prompting fears that hash power could retreat during downturns and open the door to security concerns. On the other, supporters contend that Bitcoin’s protocol is designed to rebalance automatically: when less-efficient miners exit, difficulty adjusts downward, and profitability converges again as competition for electricity shifts. The discussion isn’t merely speculative. It sits at the intersection of energy economics, infrastructure strategy, and the long-standing premise that Bitcoin’s decentralized ledger remains secure regardless of how capital migrates between sectors.
Key takeaways
- The core economic driver is the relative value of electricity: Bitcoin mining yields roughly $57–$129 per megawatt, while AI data centers can generate $200–$500 per megawatt for the same energy, prompting capital to flow toward AI workloads.
- Major miners and financiers have already signaled a shift: Core Scientific secured up to $1 billion in credit for AI hosting, MARA Holdings signaled a BTC sale to fund AI pivot, and Hut 8 reportedly sealed a $7 billion AI infrastructure agreement with Google in December.
- Bitcoin’s hashpower has fallen since its October peak, down about 14.5% at times, raising questions about network security and the likelihood of a 51%‑style risk during cycles of energy constraint.
- Industry voices are split: some argue that difficulty adjustments will push out the least efficient miners and sustain profitability, while others warn that energy scarcity could undermine security if AI demand outbids miners for power over extended periods.
- Bitcoin’s price action adds a hinge. A single green candle could tilt sentiment toward renewed mining resilience; a prolonged price decline could accelerate the AI pivot and test the network’s energy resilience.
Tickers mentioned: $BTC
Sentiment: Neutral
Price impact: Neutral. The discussion focuses on mining economics rather than immediate price moves, though BTC has posted gains in March.
Trading idea (Not Financial Advice): Hold
Market context: The debate unfolds amid broader crypto-market conditions where energy costs, grid flexibility, and capital allocation between hash rate growth and compute workloads influence miners’ strategic choices, all within a shifting macro and regulatory backdrop.
Why it matters
The question at the heart of the discussion is simple in form but complex in consequence: does a shift of mining power away from traditional Bitcoin production toward AI compute threaten the network’s security, or does it reflect a healthy reallocation of resources toward higher‑yield compute? The answer could reshape how investors view risk, how miners optimize their fleets, and how the broader crypto ecosystem prices energy and capacity for digital assets.
On the security side, some observers warn that a sustained exodus of hash power could compress the margin of safety that underpins Bitcoin’s decentralized security model. A prominent voice in the debate argues that if AI demand exhausts cheaper electricity or drives prices higher for data-center workloads, miners might retreat from public networks, temporarily lowering the hashrate. They worry about scenarios where a handful of actors accumulate outsized control during energy crises, potentially enabling attack vectors. The counterview, however, emphasizes Bitcoin’s built‑in mechanics: when profitability drops, miners turn off, the network’s difficulty recovers downward, and miner incentives align with current energy pricing, restoring a balance that Bitcoin’s protocol has weathered across multiple cycles.
Beyond security, the energy and infrastructure story matters for the broader crypto economy. AI data centers convert electricity into compute at a rate that, in some cases, outpaces Bitcoin mining. This prospect is not purely hypothetical: several players have publicly signaled major shifts toward AI hosting and AI‑related infrastructure. The confluence of AI demand and Bitcoin’s energy footprint raises questions about grid resilience, stranded energy potential, and whether liquidity and risk appetite in the sector will adapt quickly enough to the changing capital flows. In this context, the debate mirrors a broader trend in the digital economy: compute is becoming the dominant commodity, and the allocation of that compute—whether for cryptographic security or AI workloads—will shape the price and reliability of both energy and networks.
Notable voices have framed the discussion with provocative statements and sharp contrasts. The argument that AI is siphoning away Bitcoin’s core value proposition gained traction when traders highlighted substantial revenue differentials: Bitcoin mining revenue per megawatt sits in roughly the $57–$129 range, while AI data centers have reported $200–$500 per megawatt for equivalent power. That delta is the engine driving a reallocation of capital and capacity, at least in the near term. Yet even within this frame, there are counterpoints about the resilience of Bitcoin’s economics. Veteran cryptographers and investors have stressed that a falling hash rate triggers automatic responses in difficulty and profitability, a process that has occurred repeatedly in past bear markets but may unfold differently this time given potential energy constraints and the strategic value of AI workloads.
In addition to the energy calculus, the narrative features concrete corporate moves. Core Scientific, a major data-center operator, reportedly secured up to $1 billion in credit facilities to fund AI hosting initiatives. Meanwhile, Hut 8 signed a substantial AI infrastructure agreement with a tech giant late last year, underscoring the appetite for AI-dedicated capacity in the sector. MARA Holdings, for its part, signaled intentions to monetize some BTC holdings to finance AI pivot strategies. These moves illustrate a sector-wide reallocation that could recalibrate which assets and firms are most influential in the near term. The implications extend beyond mining economics; they touch on how the crypto industry orchestrates energy resilience, investor capital, and governance around network security.
“What happens to Bitcoin is simple: tick tock, next block! Difficult adjusts downwards, the least efficient and AI switchers move out, and Bitcoin mining profitability converges to AI profitability. QED.”
Cost considerations also bleed into sentiment. Some observers argue that the market and the network will adapt as they always have, with energy markets acting as an efficient allocator of resources. Others contend that recent hash power volatility and the potential for rapid shifts in compute demand could introduce new stressors into the system. As one investor put it, when AI outbids miners for electricity, the response is predictable: miners turn off until the difficulty rebalances and profitability returns. It’s a reminder that Bitcoin’s resilience is not about perpetual abundance of hash power, but about the system’s capacity to adapt to changing energy and economic conditions.
“If AI outbids miners for electricity, miners just turn off until the difficulty adjusts and it’s profitable again, that’s literally how Bitcoin works.”
Meanwhile, other voices offer a more optimistic take on the energy dynamics. Bitcoin has historically used stranded energy and flexible loads to stabilize grids, and proponents argue that the network can continue to contribute to energy markets by providing a responsive, demand-side resource that can help balance supply, especially where renewables create intermittency. In this view, the shift toward AI is not a threat but a reallocation of the same resource—electricity—toward higher-value compute tasks, with Bitcoin retaining its role as a secure, verifiable store of value even as capital flows diversify.
Despite the disagreement, a common thread remains: Bitcoin’s price trajectory and the pace of AI‑driven capital reallocation will interact in ways that determine miners’ behavior in the months ahead. Some market participants point to the possibility of a single decisive move—one “green candle” in BTC’s price—that could reanchor miners’ incentives, drawing capital back toward the network. In the absence of that signal, the landscape could remain tense as energy prices and compute demands jockey for position, with each side framing the outcome through its own risk calculus.
As the narrative unfolds, observers keep a close eye on on-chain and market signals. Bitcoin’s price performance, hash rate, and the economics of power provision will collectively shape miners’ strategies and the security posture of the network. The discussion is not about doom; it is about understanding how a high‑stakes compute economy will influence a system designed to withstand disruption by design. The bitcoin ecosystem is a dynamic mix of hardware, software, energy, and capital, and the direction of travel—whether toward AI dominance or a renewed focus on hash power—will define the next phase of this ongoing evolution.
What to watch next
- Reported movements in miner hashrate and energy usage, especially any ongoing declines or stabilizations after the October peak.
- New AI infrastructure investments or partnerships from major miners and technology firms.
- Regulatory developments or policy signals that affect energy pricing, data-center incentives, or crypto mining operations.
- BTC price action and potential “green candle” scenarios that could shift mining economics back toward traditional Bitcoin production.
- Updates on energy-grid integration and the use of stranded energy by crypto miners or AI facilities.
Sources & verification
- Ran Neuner’s post asserting AI as Bitcoin’s primary competitor for energy, linked via https://x.com/cryptomanran/status/2033161262058889251
- Adam Back’s perspective on difficulty, profitability, and convergence via https://x.com/adam3us/status/2033278188059537602
- HashRateIndex data demonstrating bitcoin hashprice trends and network profitability
- Core Scientific credit facility coverage: https://cointelegraph.com/news/core-scientific-secures-up-to-1b-credit-facility-from-morgan-stanley-for-data-center-development
- BTC price coverage and market data: https://cointelegraph.com/bitcoin-price and CoinGlass market data
- On‑chain and market context coverage relating to AI infrastructure deals and mining pivots
AI competition and Bitcoin mining: implications for security and energy
The debate about AI’s influence on Bitcoin’s security has moved from academic conjecture to a real-world energy and capital reallocation story. The central question is whether AI demand can outpace Bitcoin’s need for secure, affordable hash power long enough to alter the network’s risk profile. Supporters of the skeptical view argue that Bitcoin’s design—automatic difficulty adjustment, competitive mining economics, and the ability of miners to turn off during downturns—will preserve security even if some participants shift toward AI workloads. The fundamental mechanism remains straightforward: when hashpower declines, difficulty adjusts, improving profitability for those who stay and those who pivot back as conditions improve. In this framing, a Bitcoin “doomsday” is unlikely, even if the near term looks unsettled.
But the counterargument points to concrete capital movements that could constrain immediate security improvements if AI demand for power remains robust. The figures are stark: Bitcoin mining revenue per MW sits in a modest range, around $57–$129, while AI compute can pull in $200–$500 per MW for the same electricity. If AI deployments scale faster than miners can reallocate, the cost of securing the network could rise relative to alternative compute opportunities, pressuring the incentive structure that has long underpinned Bitcoin’s security model. Industry participants cite both the potential for improved efficiency as the network adjusts and the risk of energy bottlenecks if AI demand remains strong and energy prices stay high. In such conditions, the network’s resilience will depend on how quickly hashpower can reconfigure, how readily energy can be redirected, and how effective automatic adjustments are in realigning profitability.
The human side of the equation is equally important. The sector has already seen miners explore AI hosting and AI infrastructure deals as a way to monetize energy resources more efficiently. Core Scientific’s substantial credit facility for AI hosting, MARA Holdings’ readiness to monetize BTC for AI pivot capital, and Hut 8’s appointment of AI-backed infrastructure arrangements illustrate a broader strategic shift toward compute-centric opportunities. These moves reflect a fundamental trade-off: the crypto mining industry seeks to optimize returns in a world where electricity is a valuable, contested resource, while Bitcoin’s security model relies on a broad and relatively diverse base of hash power. The tension between these objectives will likely shape the sector’s evolution in the months ahead, with the outcome depending on energy prices, regulatory signals, and macro risk sentiment.
In the end, the resilience of Bitcoin’s security hinges on governance by the market as much as by the protocol. A single green candle in BTC’s price could re-anchor mining economics and redirect capital back toward securing the network. Yet even in a scenario of price weakness, the network’s core design provides a built‑in corrective mechanism: as profitability falls, less efficient operators exit, the difficulty adjusts, and the remaining participants recalibrate. The broader energy landscape — still characterized by its variability and potential for using stranded resources — remains a critical backdrop. The coming quarters will reveal how efficiently miners balance the imperative of AI compute with the imperative of maintaining a robust, decentralized security posture for Bitcoin.
Dane Miller’s NCAA Bracket Analysis for Teams in the West
China’s Alibaba could launch Qwen for enterprise this week
1.7m UK homes facing soaring bills as heating oil costs doubled in a week amid Iran conflict
-
Tech5 days agoA 1,300-Pound NASA Spacecraft To Re-Enter Earth’s Atmosphere
-
Crypto World2 days ago
HYPE Token Enters Net Deflation as HyperCore Buybacks Outpace Staking Rewards
-
News Videos7 days ago10th Algebra | Financial Planning | Question Bank Solution | Board Exam 2026
-
Business6 days agoExxonMobil seeks to move corporate registration from New Jersey to Texas
-
Crypto World7 days agoParadigm, a16z, Winklevoss Capital, Balaji Srinivasan among investors in ZODL
-
Fashion3 days agoWeekend Open Thread: Addict Lip Glow
-
Tech6 days agoChatGPT will now generate interactive visuals to help you with math and science concepts
-
Sports2 days ago
Why Duke and Michigan Are Dead Even Entering Selection Sunday
-
NewsBeat5 days agoResidents reaction as Shildon murder probe enters second day
-
Business5 days agoSearch Enters Sixth Week With New Leads in Tucson Abduction Case
-
NewsBeat6 days agoPagazzi Lighting enters administration as 70 jobs lost and 11 stores close across Scotland
-
Business14 hours agoSearch for Savannah Guthrie’s Mother Enters Seventh Week with No Arrests
-
Tech7 days agoDespite challenges, Ireland sixth in EU for board gender diversity
-
Business2 days agoUS Airports Launch Donation Drives for Unpaid TSA Workers as Partial Government Shutdown Enters Fifth Week
-
Crypto World2 days ago
Coinbase and Bybit in Investment Talks: Could Bybit Finally Enter the US Crypto Market?
-
NewsBeat5 days agoI Entered The Manosphere. Nothing Could Prepare Me For What I Found.
-
Business7 days agoSearch Enters 39th Day with FBI Tip Line Developments and No Major Breakthroughs
-
Sports7 days agoSkateboarding World Championships: Britain’s Sky Brown wins park gold
-
Business2 days agoCountry star Brantley Gilbert enters growing non-alcoholic beer market
-
Crypto World6 days agoWill Chainlink price reclaim $10 amid volatility squeeze?
