Crypto World
BTC stuck at $63,000 as ETF inflows offset selling; CPI inflation looms
Bitcoin barely budged on Tuesday, extending a five-week standstill as steady demand from exchange-traded funds ran into selling from miners and corporate holders.
BTC slipped to around $63,500, down 0.6% over the past 24 hours. More importantly, the largest cryptocurrency remained trapped in the roughly $62,000-$66,000 range that has contained prices for much of the summer.
“Bitcoin’s recent price action has largely been driven by steady ETF inflows being offset by OTC selling from miners and Strategy (MSTR),” Paul Howard, senior director at trading firm Wincent, said.

Crypto trading volumes have fallen to their lowest levels in three years, he added, leaving little firepower to push BTC decisively in either direction.
Bitfinex analysts also pointed to the competing flows. ETFs and bitcoin treasury companies have been two major sources of price-insensitive demand, they said, but corporate treasury activity has recently provided offsetting selling pressure. That helps explain why BTC gained only about 2% last week despite strong ETF inflows and better performance across broader risk markets.
CPI could shake bitcoin from its slumber
Wednesday’s U.S. inflation report could finally give traders a reason to break the stalemate.
Crypto World
Spritehood NFTs raise $1.28M on Robinhood Chain
Spritehood has sold 42,956 paid NFTs on Robinhood Chain in about 53 minutes, generating nearly $1.28 million for Pudgy Penguins co-founder Cole Villemain.
Summary
- Paid buyers minted 42,956 Spritehood NFTs priced at either $17 or $117.
- The sale generated about $1.283 million, equal to roughly 684.28 ETH at the mint price.
- Another 1,488 NFTs were distributed free, bringing the reported collection total to 44,444.
- Spritehood’s Blockscout contract page displays unverified source code, limiting public review of its mechanics.
Spritehood NFT sale reached $1.28 million
The Defiant reported that Villemain launched Spritehood on Aug. 11 after previously being removed from the founding team of Pudgy Penguins, with the paid portion of the sale selling out in less than one hour.
On-chain analyst 0xlaplaced calculated that the mint generated about $1.2829 million, or approximately 684.28 ETH, based on the price of Ether during the sale. The final total came in well above an earlier estimate of roughly $755,000 that circulated before the mint had finished.
According to the analyst’s transaction review, buyers minted 37,430 NFTs for $17 each, producing $636,310 in proceeds. A second group of 5,526 NFTs sold for $117 each, adding another $646,542.
Combined, the two paid tiers generated $1,282,852 from 42,956 tokens. The deploying address had already distributed 1,488 NFTs at no charge through 20 zero-price transactions before the public sale, taking the full reported supply to 44,444 items.
Although the available figures show how many tokens moved at each price, the supplied report did not identify what determined whether a buyer paid $17 or $117. It also did not provide details about any benefits, future access, or other features attached to the collection.
Unverified code limits review of Spritehood’s mint
Spritehood’s contract appears with an “unverified” label on Robinhood Chain’s Blockscout explorer, according to The Defiant. An unverified contract can still operate and record transactions on-chain, but its human-readable source code has not been matched publicly with the deployed bytecode through the explorer.
Without that verification, buyers cannot use Blockscout to inspect the complete source code governing Spritehood’s pricing and distribution process. The label does not establish that the contract is malicious or faulty, though it reduces the information available for independent review through the explorer.
The reported mint figures instead come from an analysis of completed blockchain transactions. Since every paid tier can be calculated separately, the on-chain totals explain why the final proceeds exceeded the figure shared while the sale was still underway.
No information in the supplied report indicates that Robinhood organized, promoted or endorsed the Spritehood launch. Robinhood describes its network as a permissionless Ethereum Layer 2, meaning independent developers can deploy applications and tokens without each project representing an official Robinhood product.
Robinhood Chain has attracted speculative assets
Spritehood arrived about six weeks after Robinhood opened its Layer 2 network to the public. As crypto.news reported in July, Robinhood Chain launched as an Arbitrum-based Ethereum scaling network designed for tokenized stocks and decentralized finance applications.
The mainnet debuted with integrations involving infrastructure providers, including Alchemy, BitGo, and Chainlink. Robinhood also introduced Stock Tokens for eligible users outside the United States, while decentralized exchanges and lending applications supplied on-chain trading functions.
Despite its stated focus on financial assets, permissionless deployment has allowed unrelated tokens and speculative projects to enter the network. A July network review found that memecoin trading had become a major source of early activity, even though Robinhood built the chain around tokenized equities and real-world assets.
The network’s early activity also produced a gap between trading volume and available liquidity. Another July analysis found $570 million in launch-week trading volume against $21.68 million in liquidity, with incentive-backed decentralized finance deposits and speculative tokens driving much of the activity.
More recent figures cited by Bitmine Chairman Tom Lee placed Robinhood Chain’s cumulative decentralized exchange volume near $9 billion. Lee said the chain could expose Robinhood’s 27 million customers to Ethereum-based services, although the figure represented the company’s funded customer base rather than confirmed users of the blockchain.
ETH functions as Robinhood Chain’s native gas token, while network transactions settle through Ethereum. Buyers therefore need ETH to pay transaction fees when directly using applications deployed on the chain, including NFT contracts such as Spritehood.
Pudgy Penguins history follows Villemain’s new mint
Villemain, also known online as ColeThereum, helped create Pudgy Penguins with three other founders in 2021. The original collection contained 8,888 penguin profile-picture NFTs and sold out shortly after launch.
An earlier Pudgy Penguins history published by crypto.news said the initial mint priced the NFTs at about $90 each and generated more than $800,000. The collection later became one of the most recognized projects from the NFT market’s 2021 expansion.
Pudgy Penguins holders voted Villemain out of the founding team in January 2022. The removal followed community allegations that he had misused project funds and failed to deliver on parts of the project’s roadmap.
The claims remained allegations, and the supplied report said Villemain was not prosecuted over them. Entrepreneur Luca Netz later acquired control of the Pudgy Penguins brand in April 2022 for 750 ETH, taking over its leadership after the original team’s removal.
Under its new ownership, the project expanded beyond blockchain collectibles into physical toys, licensing deals, and the PENGU token. Pudgy Penguins has also continued to register periods of high secondary-market activity, including a 247% weekly sales increase to $9.3 million in July 2025.
What the Spritehood sale means for US buyers
Robinhood is a U.S.-listed brokerage, but use of its public blockchain does not mean an NFT carries Robinhood’s approval or the protections attached to a brokerage account. The company’s official disclosures describe Robinhood Chain as a permissionless and separate blockchain from its regulated financial services.
For U.S. buyers, the tax treatment of NFT purchases also differs from buying assets inside a standard brokerage account. The Internal Revenue Service treats digital assets as property, and its guidance requires taxpayers to report taxable gains or losses when cryptocurrency is sold, exchanged or used to acquire property, including an NFT.
Paying for a Spritehood NFT with ETH may therefore create a taxable disposal for a U.S. buyer if the Ether changed in value between acquisition and use. Any later sale of the NFT may produce another reportable gain or loss based on the difference between its cost basis and sale proceeds.
Federal securities treatment depends on the economic facts surrounding an offering rather than the NFT label alone. In 2023, the Securities and Exchange Commission charged Impact Theory over an NFT offering that raised about $30 million, while Stoner Cats 2 agreed to settle charges tied to an $8 million NFT sale.
Neither the supplied report nor the cited on-chain review said a U.S. regulator had examined Spritehood or alleged that its NFTs were securities. The report also did not identify any passive-income rights, revenue-sharing terms, or promises of returns attached to the collection.
Crypto World
Fed rate hike debate grows with inflation above 2%
Chicago Fed President Austan Goolsbee has identified inflation above the Federal Reserve’s 2% target as the main U.S. economic problem while officials debate whether to raise rates from 3.50%–3.75%.
Summary
- Goolsbee called inflation the economy’s biggest problem, while describing the labor market as stable but weak.
- The Fed held rates at 3.50%–3.75% in July, with three officials backing a 25-basis-point increase.
- Economists expect July headline and core CPI to slow to 3.4% and 2.5%, respectively.
- Bitcoin fell into the low-$63,000 range as oil prices and inflation concerns reduced demand for risk assets.
Why Goolsbee sees inflation as the main challenge
Wired released Goolsbee’s interview on Aug. 11 after recording the discussion on June 22, with the Chicago Fed president arguing that fast-rising prices remain more damaging than current labor-market conditions.
“The biggest problem facing our economy right now is not the collapse of industry and the collapse of jobs; it’s that the prices have been rising too fast,” Goolsbee said. “We got an inflation problem and people hate inflation.”
While assessing employment, Goolsbee pointed to the unemployment rate, hiring and layoffs as the three main indicators shaping his view. He described the labor market as “stable, without being good,” indicating that conditions have weakened without showing the type of collapse that would make employment the central bank’s most urgent concern.
The Chicago Fed president did not provide guidance on whether he would support an increase at the Federal Open Market Committee’s Sept. 15–16 meeting. Goolsbee does not vote on monetary policy this year, although his comments add to the public debate among regional Fed presidents and members of the Board of Governors.
Inflation has remained above the central bank’s 2% goal despite periods of slower monthly price growth. The June consumer price index fell 0.4% from May, while annual inflation eased to 3.5% from 4.2%, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics. Core CPI, which removes food and energy, was unchanged for the month and increased 2.6% from a year earlier.
Fed rate hike support has divided policymakers
At its July 28–29 meeting, the Federal Reserve maintained rates within a target range of 3.50%–3.75% by a 9–3 vote. Beth Hammack, Neel Kashkari, and Lorie Logan dissented because they preferred a 25-basis-point increase.
Minneapolis Fed President Kashkari has since argued that the central bank should begin raising rates as elevated inflation and the U.S.-Iran conflict complicate the policy outlook. The closure of the Strait of Hormuz has restricted a route that normally carries about one-fifth of global oil and gas supplies, according to Reuters.
Kashkari said uncertainty around the conflict made it difficult for the Fed to promise rate cuts or provide firm guidance. During an earlier CBS interview, he said policymakers “might have to go the other direction” if the war and resulting energy shock kept inflation elevated.
The Minneapolis Fed president also warned that there was no assurance that shipping through Hormuz would return to normal quickly. Higher oil costs can reach American households through gasoline prices, while businesses may face increased transport and production expenses.
St. Louis Fed President Alberto Musalem has also backed tighter policy, arguing that an early and gradual response would be less disruptive than waiting until inflation becomes more firmly established. San Francisco Fed President Mary Daly supported the July decision to leave rates unchanged, saying the central bank needed more evidence to determine whether the energy-driven increase would prove temporary or persistent.
Meanwhile, Goolsbee’s comments place him closer to the Fed’s inflation-focused camp without confirming how he would approach the next policy decision. His description of employment as stable separates current conditions from a severe labor downturn, even though the latest payroll figures showed a notable loss of momentum.
Weak jobs data has reduced September hike expectations
The U.S. economy lost 23,000 nonfarm payroll positions in July, while the unemployment rate remained near 4.1%, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics. May and June payroll estimates were also reduced by a combined 103,000 jobs, while average hourly earnings increased 3.2% from a year earlier.
As crypto.news reported in its July payroll coverage, Bitcoin initially gained almost 2% and traded near $65,200 after the report reduced expectations of an immediate rate increase. Prediction-market traders raised the probability that the Fed would leave rates unchanged in September to 66%, up from about 50% one day earlier.
Expectations have continued to vary across contracts. The supplied prediction-market data placed the probability of no September change at 59%, while a separate contract gave a rate increase before the end of 2026 the same probability. Since the contracts cover different time periods, the figures do not represent conflicting outcomes for the same FOMC meeting.
Iggy Ioppe, chief investment officer at Theo, previously told crypto.news that one weak employment report would not necessarily overcome the inflation concerns created by energy prices and shipping disruptions.
“A softer jobs number does not automatically close that gap,” Ioppe said. “Risk assets, including Bitcoin, retain the medium-term support that comes from continued inaction, but the same geopolitical energy risk that is keeping the Fed cautious also continues to limit upside.”
For U.S. crypto investors, the rate decision can affect Treasury yields, the dollar and demand for assets that do not pay interest. Higher rates raise the returns available from lower-risk government debt, while tighter financial conditions can reduce the amount of capital investors allocate to Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies.
July CPI has become the next test for Bitcoin
The Bureau of Labor Statistics is scheduled to release July CPI at 8:30 a.m. ET on Aug. 12. Economists surveyed by Reuters expect headline inflation to slow from 3.5% to 3.4% annually, with core inflation easing from 2.6% to 2.5%.
A recent CPI preview reported that expectations for a September rate increase had fallen to 44% from 67% one week earlier after the weak payroll numbers. The U.S. 10-year Treasury yield was trading near 4.66%, while Bitcoin had briefly moved above $65,000 before failing to establish the level as support.
Selling returned on Aug. 11 as crude oil rose and negotiations over Hormuz lost momentum. Bitcoin dropped about 2% to $63,780 before attempting an intraday recovery, while Ether and XRP also came under pressure. U.S. spot Bitcoin ETFs recorded $144.6 million in net withdrawals on Aug. 10, ending five consecutive sessions of inflows, according to SoSoValue data cited in Bitcoin’s latest decline.
Iranian official Mohsen Rezaei said the Strait of Hormuz would remain closed unless the United States met Tehran’s conditions, which included ending the war and unfreezing Iranian assets held abroad. His statement followed comments from Pakistan’s defense minister that Washington and Tehran were close to an arrangement despite fresh attacks on maritime traffic.
Crypto World
‘Dollar Smile’ Creator Says Yen Intervention Marks the Peak: Is 125 Next?
Eurizon SLJ Capital says the dollar has peaked against the yen after the joint US-Japan yen intervention. The firm sees the yen reaching 125 per dollar, a gain of more than 20% from today.
The market is not listening yet. The yen fell 1% on Monday to 159.27 per dollar, the weakest of the Group-of-10 (G10) major currencies.
Follow us on X to get the latest news as it happens
Why Eurizon Believes Dollar-Yen Has Peaked
Stephen Jen, Eurizon SLJ Capital’s chief executive, made the call in a Tuesday note with portfolio manager Joana Freire. Jen created the ‘dollar smile’, the theory that the dollar rises in US booms and global crises but sags in between.
The name comes from the U-shaped curve this traces. His logic here is simple. Both governments have spent real money on the defense, and neither can afford to lose.
“Dollar-yen has most likely peaked, as neither the US nor Japan would give up or concede to the market. … Resistance is futile,” Bloomberg reported, citing Eurizon.
Washington and Tokyo spent roughly $87 billion buying yen on July 30 and 31. It was their first joint yen purchase since 1998. Only the 2011 Fukushima response was bigger.
Speculators noticed. Hedge funds cut their yen short bets in the week through August 4, Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) data show.
Yen Intervention Gains Are Already Half Gone
The problem is what happened next. Dollar-yen dropped from nearly 164 to 155.2 on the intervention. It now trades near 159.3. In under two weeks, the yen has given back half its intervention gains.
The reason has not changed. US interest rates still sit far above Japan’s, so Japanese money keeps flowing abroad. Goldman Sachs data show Japanese investors bought foreign bonds at a strong pace through July.
Japan’s finances make the defense harder. Government debt hit a record 1,346.7 trillion yen at the end of June, about $69,000 per resident. Bond yields sit at 31-year highs, and the four largest insurers hold about 14.5 trillion yen in unrealized bond losses.
Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent says the US remains willing to support Japan. Markets price roughly 63% odds of a Bank of Japan (BOJ) rate hike in September. At least three of nine board members pushed for faster increases in July, the bank’s summary showed Monday.
Skeptics See a Trap, Not a Turning Point
Robin Brooks is not convinced. The Brookings Institution senior fellow and former Goldman Sachs currency strategist spoke in a Channel 4 News interview on Tuesday. He argued no yen recovery can last while BOJ bond buying holds long-term yields artificially low.
Michael Gayed, publisher of the Lead-Lag Report newsletter, expects something more sudden.
“Yields are spiking because Japan is dumping Treasuries. The mother of all short squeezes is coming for the Yen. Crash stocks. Save bonds. The reverse carry trade. The Godzilla Margin Call,” he laid it out in a post on X.
History offers both sides a lesson. The 1998 intervention did not stop the yen’s slide either. The turn came in October that year. A sudden unwind of the yen carry trade lifted the currency about 15% in one week. In that trade, investors borrow cheap yen to buy assets abroad.
A September hike would shrink the rate gap that keeps today’s yen carry trade alive. Closing those positions forces selling worldwide. The BOJ meeting is the real test. It could hand the yen the support that $87 billion could not buy, or start the unwind the skeptics describe.
The post ‘Dollar Smile’ Creator Says Yen Intervention Marks the Peak: Is 125 Next? appeared first on BeInCrypto.
Crypto World
Coinbase secures Abu Dhabi license for tokenized securities
Coinbase has secured Abu Dhabi regulatory approval to arrange investment deals and provide custody as it prepares an international hub for tokenized securities and onchain capital markets.
Summary
- Coinbase has received Financial Services Permission from Abu Dhabi Global Market’s financial regulator.
- The authorization covers arranging investment deals and providing custody for tokenized securities.
- Eligible token holders will receive shareholder rights, including dividends and voting rights.
- Coinbase plans to operate major tokenization and derivatives businesses from Abu Dhabi and Dubai.
Coinbase secures approval for tokenized securities
Coinbase said in an announcement published by Abu Dhabi Global Market that the Financial Services Regulatory Authority had granted the exchange Financial Services Permission to arrange investment deals and provide custody services.
The authorization gives Coinbase a regulated base within ADGM, Abu Dhabi’s international financial center, for issuing and servicing digital securities linked to traditional financial assets. Under the planned structure, Coinbase will register and issue the securities in ADGM under FSRA supervision.
Rather than using the emirate only for cryptocurrency trading, the company plans to make Abu Dhabi its primary international tokenization center outside the United States. Services developed there will focus on bringing securities and other capital-market products onto blockchain networks.
Each tokenized security will be backed by an underlying share, Coinbase said. Eligible verified holders will receive rights connected to the represented stock, including dividend and voting rights, subject to the terms contained in the relevant prospectus.
Under the conditions described for the product, dividend payments will be reinvested automatically. Some voting and redemption rights will also depend on whether a holder meets the applicable vesting requirements, meaning access to every shareholder function may not be immediate or available under identical terms.
The licensing announcement did not identify the first shares Coinbase will tokenize, the blockchain networks that will support them, or a date for the initial offering. It also did not specify which countries’ residents will qualify to purchase the securities.
Wallets will replace conventional brokerage accounts
Unlike a normal stock purchase, investors will not need a conventional brokerage account or a correspondent banking relationship to hold the planned securities, according to Coinbase. Eligible users will instead need a compatible blockchain wallet.
Transfers will remain subject to compliance controls despite taking place through wallets. Coinbase said every transaction will undergo continued sanctions screening, while the company will retain the ability to freeze or seize assets at the wallet level when regulations require it.
The control mechanism places restrictions directly into the tokenized-security system rather than relying only on checks at the point of purchase. Coinbase presented the model as a way to make blockchain-based assets compatible with securities regulation and decentralized finance applications.
Brett Tejpaul, co-CEO of Coinbase Institutional, said ADGM had established one of the first regulatory systems for virtual assets in 2018 and had continued developing rules for blockchain-based financial products.
“No major financial center has yet built a framework that treats tokenized equities simultaneously as securities, blockchain-native tokens, and DeFi-composable assets,” Tejpaul said.
Arvind Ramamurthy, ADGM’s chief market development officer, described the planned hub as an endorsement of Abu Dhabi’s role in blockchain-based finance. He said the financial center would continue supporting products designed to improve market access and transparency while maintaining regulatory oversight.
The planned ownership model follows Coinbase’s earlier work on 1:1-backed tokenized stocks with Base, its Ethereum layer-2 network. Crypto.news reported in July that Base founder Jesse Pollak said the companies were close to introducing equities backed by actual underlying shares.
Pollak contrasted the planned product with stock-linked derivatives that track share prices without giving customers ownership of the represented stock. At that time, neither Base nor Coinbase had disclosed the product’s custody arrangements, issuance process or supported securities.
Abu Dhabi license adds to Coinbase’s UAE operations
From Abu Dhabi, Coinbase plans to build its tokenized-securities and on-chain capital markets business, while Dubai will serve as a base for its international derivatives operations. The company described the two units as among its most ambitious businesses outside the United States.
The separate locations also place the operations under different regulatory systems. ADGM and its FSRA oversee financial services in Abu Dhabi’s financial free zone, while the Dubai Virtual Assets Regulatory Authority supervises virtual-asset businesses operating in or from Dubai, except those based in the Dubai International Financial Centre.
Coinbase’s selection of the UAE comes as other financial institutions build regulated digital-asset services in Abu Dhabi. In May, crypto.news covered BNY’s custody plans with Finstreet and ADI Foundation, beginning with Bitcoin and Ether before a proposed expansion into stablecoins and tokenized real-world assets.
BNY said that work would be based in ADGM and remain subject to final agreements and regulatory approvals. The proposed service uses Finstreet’s licensed trading, settlement, custody, and investment infrastructure alongside the ADI Chain blockchain network.
Coinbase is also expanding products for professional investors in the United Kingdom. Its recent UK derivatives rollout includes more than 170 contracts covering cryptocurrencies, equities, commodities, and foreign exchange.
Eligible UK professional clients will receive progressive access to perpetual contracts offering continuous trading and leverage of up to 50 times. Dated futures will carry leverage of up to 20 times, while the options offering will initially cover crypto assets.
U.S. rules remain central to Coinbase’s tokenization plans
For American investors, the Abu Dhabi approval does not by itself authorize Coinbase to offer the ADGM-issued securities in the United States. Any domestic product involving tokenized shares would remain subject to U.S. securities laws and SEC oversight.
In June, U.S. exemption discussions centered on a possible SEC framework that could allow companies to test blockchain-based securities under modified regulatory requirements. Lawyers and market participants cited by Reuters expected SEC Chair Paul Atkins to introduce an innovation exemption, although the regulator had not finalized the reported plan.
Coinbase had already disclosed plans for tokenized shares backed one-for-one by underlying securities as those discussions continued. CoinGecko data cited in the June report showed the number of listed tokenized stocks rising from 14 in January 2024 to 478 by May 2026, an increase of more than 3,300%.
Competition has since reached the U.S. market. Dinari introduced tokenized versions of all S&P 500 stocks for eligible American investors in August, using self-custody wallets funded with USDC. The company said each token is backed by an underlying security held with a regulated custodian and includes voting, dividend, and redemption rights.
Outside tokenization, Coinbase began giving eligible UK customers access to U.S. equities on Aug. 6. The phased service covers nearly 4,000 stocks, supports purchases funded with pounds or USDC, and allows fractional investments from £1, while Apex executes and clears the orders and holds the shares in the United States.
Crypto World
AI computing power becomes a tradable asset class as CME starts futures
Nvidia showed CNBC its latest Rubin GPU at its Santa Clara, California, headquarters on Feb. 13, 2026.
Marc Ganley | CNBC
Computing power is emerging as a new tradable asset class, with CME Group set to launch the first futures contracts tied to the cost of running the chips that power artificial intelligence.
The exchange is partnering with Silicon Data to introduce two compute futures contracts on Oct. 5, pending regulatory approval, giving companies and investors a way to trade and hedge the price of AI computing capacity much as they do oil, electricity and other commodities.
“For years, two companies buying the exact same GPU capacity could pay wildly different prices with no way to know who got the better deal. They will now have a benchmark to check that against,” Carmen Li, CEO of Silicon Data, said in a statement. “Compute futures give the market something it’s never had: a public, tradable reference price for the resource every AI system runs on.”
The contracts will allow buyers and sellers to trade against the rental cost of Nvidia’s H100 and newer Blackwell B200 graphics processing units and will be based on Silicon Data indexes that track hourly GPU rental prices. Each contract will represent a month’s rent for the Nvidia H100.
The launch comes as Wall Street is finding new ways to finance and gain exposure to the enormous AI infrastructure buildout. Nvidia is working with some of the world’s largest asset managers on an effort that could channel as much as $500 billion into AI infrastructure.
Compute futures would add another layer to that emerging financial ecosystem. Rather than investing directly in data centers, chips or the companies building them, investors could gain exposure to the price of the underlying computing capacity itself, while AI developers and data-center operators could use the contracts to hedge their costs or revenues.
Crypto World
ZachXBT Names Tiffany Milanovich in Alleged Wallet and Coinbase Theft Network
Prominent blockchain investigator ZachXBT identified Tiffany Milanovich as a US-based threat actor tied to at least $5 million in thefts through hardware wallet and centralized exchange support impersonation scams.
He said Milanovich worked as a “caller” and posed as exchange or wallet support, convincing victims to give up access to their funds. ZachXBT said she has recorded herself taunting victims on calls after draining their accounts. He also said she openly shows luxury purchases, stolen funds, and casino gambling on social media.
From Support Calls to Crypto Flexes
In June 2026, one victim lost $1.2 million in BTC and ETH after Milanovich and her group drained a Trezor wallet. According to the on-chain sleuth, the theft followed a spoofed BitcoinIRA email sent under the alias “Patricia Massie.” The accused later began showing off the theft in Telegram groups.
Another threat actor using the aliases “bled” and “harm” appears to have provided the phishing panel infrastructure. Most of the stolen funds have not moved and remain dormant. In October 2025, another victim lost $500,000 in Bitcoin after Milanovich and her group drained a Coinbase account.
ZachXBT said she was recorded complaining about her share of that theft and later posted a screenshot of the withdrawal herself. In February 2026, she also allegedly went “band 4 band” with another threat actor during a Discord call and showed balances to prove who held more.
The investigator claimed that she moved $100,000 to an Exodus wallet. The address now holds 631,000 DAI, which was funded through multiple instant exchanges from Monero.
Connection to John Daghita
As reported by CryptoPotato, ZachXBT had exposed John Daghita, known as Lick, for allegedly stealing $46 million in seized crypto from the US government. He said Milanovich, who was already close to Daghita, recorded him on a call and shared the recording to troll him.
Daghita later retaliated by posting her name in his public Telegram channel. Milanovich was accused of gambling a victim’s stolen funds at a casino while calling and mocking the victim.
ZachXBT said he reported the account, and that Shuffle reviewed the evidence and confirmed the account would be locked. Milanovich appeared to have altered several videos flaunting funds to make it look like she had stolen more than she actually had. In one Ledger Live clip, she is said to have pretended to be the owner of a service hot wallet that received 7.7K JITOSOL.
Milanovich also shared a screenshot of a search and seizure warrant against her in Connecticut, according to the findings. The warrant was dated before several of the incidents described in his posts. In a separate recording, she mentioned a booked flight and said her funds remained untouched.
“Hopefully Tiffany faces legal consequences soon. She stole from people, taunted them directly, and flexed the proceeds online without a trace of remorse. At the same time, she’s left a complete paper trail of chat logs, recordings, and onchain data.”
The post ZachXBT Names Tiffany Milanovich in Alleged Wallet and Coinbase Theft Network appeared first on CryptoPotato.
Crypto World
'Crashing' Is One of TIME's 50 Most Underappreciated TV Shows

Crypto World
Supermicro Stock Jumps 10% on Doubled Margins and Record AI Backlog
Supermicro stock (SMCI) jumped nearly 10% in after market trading on Tuesday. It follows Super Micro Computer posting a 17.5% quarterly gross margin, almost double last year, and a record order backlog.
Less than two years ago, the AI server maker was fighting to keep its Nasdaq listing. Now it projects up to $72 billion in annual sales.
Why Supermicro Stock Rallied on Doubled Margins
Supermicro reported results after Tuesday’s close. Net sales reached $11.1 billion for the quarter ended June 30, nearly double the $5.8 billion a year earlier.
Yet the margin move stole the show. Gross margin hit 17.5%, up from 9.9% just three months earlier. Net income climbed six-fold to $1.18 billion.
Adjusted earnings, which exclude stock-based pay, hit $1.70 per share. That was two and a half times the 68-cent consensus tracked by Zacks. Revenue, meanwhile, landed at the low end of the company’s own $11 billion to $12.5 billion target.
Thin margins had long been Supermicro’s weak spot. Big cloud customers squeezed prices, and rivals fought hard for every AI server deal. Tuesday’s numbers also push back on fears that AI spending is slowing.
“As demand accelerates, we are improving profitability through a richer enterprise customer mix and broader adoption of our optimized Data Center Building Block Solutions® (DCBBS) architecture,” founder and CEO Charles Liang explained the improvement in the earnings statement.
Follow us on X to get the latest news as it happens
Record Backlog Sets Up a $72 Billion Year
Supermicro expects $14.5 billion to $15.5 billion in September-quarter revenue, over 30% above the June quarter. Full fiscal 2027 sales should land between $65 billion and $72 billion. The top end sits 84% above fiscal 2026’s $39.1 billion.
Liang said the company booked over $60 billion in new orders and added several hundred enterprise customers in a year. A July preliminary update flagged the order surge and sent the stock up more than 20% in one day.
The order wave matches heavy spending across AI hardware, where Nvidia’s $500 billion deal has raised demand-quality questions.
The rally extends one of the sharpest comebacks in AI hardware. Short seller Hindenburg Research accused the company of accounting manipulation in August 2024. Auditor Ernst & Young then resigned, and the shares lost roughly a third of their value in a day.
Supermicro filed its delayed reports in February 2025 and kept its Nasdaq listing.
That history still shadows the numbers. The results are preliminary and unaudited, and the board is reviewing certain transactions tied to export controls. Inventories nearly tripled to $12.9 billion, and operations consumed $6.8 billion in cash for the year.
The rally now rests on one question. Can margins near 17% survive as that backlog turns into shipped systems? The September quarter will offer the first answer.
The post Supermicro Stock Jumps 10% on Doubled Margins and Record AI Backlog appeared first on BeInCrypto.
Crypto World
Do state election betting bans apply to prediction markets?
Voters cast ballots at a polling location inside John Jay High School during early voting for a primary election in the Brooklyn borough of New York, US, on Sunday, June 21, 2026.
Michael Nagle | Bloomberg | Getty Images
Wisconsin sent prediction market platforms spinning last month when its election commission released a directive reminding voters that betting on elections — including via trades on event contract exchanges — is illegal in the state, based on a more than 175-year-old law.
What shocked people was the penalty that Wisconsin places on those who break its law: violators lose the right to vote in the election they bet on.
Prediction market platform Kalshi blasted the law. “This is blatantly unconstitutional and illegal,” Benjamin Freeman, head of politics growth at Kalshi, wrote in a post on X. Polymarket told the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel it looked forward to addressing the claims through the appropriate legal process.
Wisconsin isn’t alone. Twenty-three states have laws on the books that ban betting on elections, according to Pew Research Center. New York also doesn’t allow voters to cast a ballot in an election that they’ve bet on, while in most of the other states violators can face fines or jail time for wagering on an election.
However, does the language in state laws apply to trades placed on event contracts? The answer depends on the state, but many aren’t sure.
Hotly contested
In Colorado, betting on an election is a class 2 misdemeanor punishable by up to 120 days in jail or a $750 fine. Lawrence Pacheco, a spokesman for the Colorado state attorney general, was clear in a statement: “Colorado state law bars bets or wagers on elections, and that includes prediction markets.”
But few states were as direct as Colorado. A spokesperson for the New York attorney general said that the office has not made an official interpretation on its election betting statute and whether it applies to prediction market trades.
The office for the Arizona attorney general declined to comment on whether its law applies to election event contracts due to active litigation with prediction market platforms. Phil Bueler, a press secretary for the Tennessee attorney general, said that he cannot comment on what is essentially a request for a legal opinion about a “hotly contested issue.”
In March, the Maryland State Board of Elections in a memo to voters said that users should exercise caution when considering trading elections on prediction market platforms, warning that it could amount to violating the state’s law banning wagering on elections. Then, in July, the state’s administrator of elections Jared DeMarinis wrote a letter to the office of the state prosecutor to investigate whether prediction markets’ election offerings violate Maryland’s law.
“That’s why we did the March letter early,” DeMarinis said in an interview. “This is still in the early stages… and we need to make sure we seek clarity.” He added he is interested — if the current law is interpreted as not applying to prediction market trades — in seeking action from the state legislature to deliver that clarity.
Meanwhile, Nevada bans betting on elections, but court rulings have forced Polymarket and Kalshi to cease operating in the state. Due to court orders in Michigan, which also bans election wagering, Kalshi is currently in a total operational shutdown in the state while Polymarket only blocks residents’ access to its sports-related event contracts.
The Commodity Futures Trading Commission headquarters in Washington, D.C.
Ting Shen | Bloomberg | Getty Images
A new battlefront
States are already fighting with the federal government over regulating prediction markets. The Commodity Futures Trading Commission sees all event contracts as swaps, a derivative that it regulates, and thus believes companies fall under its jurisdiction, preempting any state law. States see the platforms’ offering of sports event contracts as gambling, an activity that they regulate.
However, elections may introduce a new line of defense for the states, according to legal experts. The U.S. Constitution explicitly gives the power of managing elections to the states, so they could argue in front of a court that power extends to regulating any form of placing money on said elections.
“I think the argument for the states having some place at the regulatory table with respect to elections is perhaps stronger from a preemption perspective,” said David Oliwenstein, a partner at Pillsbury and lead of the firm’s securities enforcement practice. “I think that the fact that the states have a clearly defined role… makes it a bit of an easier argument for the states to maintain jurisdiction.”
In 2024, a federal appeals court ruled that event contract platforms can feature election offerings. However, that decision overturned an intervention by the CFTC denying the listing of those contracts rather than offering a legal opinion on any state law regarding election wagering, though the commission used state laws on election bets as part of its reasoning for its denial at the time.
In this photo illustration, Apps for online prediction market sites are shown on an electronic device on Feb. 25, 2026 in Chicago, Illinois.
Scott Olson | Getty Images
“States would have an argument that not only for local races but for even national races, where you have district level outcomes, state level outcomes, where there’s close elections, that there are a variety of collateral consequences to the the prospect of individuals betting on the outcomes of these races,” said Joshua Mitts, a professor at Columbia Law School.
In its lawsuit against Kalshi, New York not only argues that the platform’s sports contracts violate state gambling laws, but also points out the company’s culture and elections event contracts. The spokesperson for the New York attorney general added that the office doesn’t have a particular view on its jurisdiction over election contracts specifically, but rather believes it has the power to regulate all gambling in any form.
Even if states were to introduce this new argument in their battle with the federal government in courts, the CFTC’s argument likely would stay the same. That’s because no matter the topic on a prediction market, the underlying instrument — a swap — doesn’t change.
Kalshi made that point in a statement to CNBC. “The law is clear — regulated prediction markets are subject to exclusive federal jurisdiction,” spokeswoman Elisabeth Diana said.
A Polymarket spokesperson echoed that sentiment. “As courts have recognized, prediction markets on CFTC-registered exchanges are governed by federal law, not a patchwork of state rules.”
The CFTC did not respond to a request for comment.
Ian Thomas, a principal attorney in the commercial litigation practice group at Offit Kurman, agreed with the other legal experts that states could take the position in court that the constitutional right to manage elections gives them power over prediction markets’ related event contracts.
However, with sports making up the majority of prediction market platforms’ volumes, he said it’s unlikely those contracts fade from the central arguments.
“Sports is such a major aspect of these platforms that it really is where everyone’s primary focus is going to be,” Thomas said, “and I think once the question of sports gets resolved, it may lead to a more easy resolution of kind of where the boundaries are on these platforms on other topics.”
Disclosure: CNBC and Kalshi have a commercial relationship that includes customer acquisition and a minority investment.
Crypto World
CFTC orders Kalshi to continue offering prediction markets in New York after state lawsuit
“New York intends to make event contract derivatives waste away under its iron curtain of state gaming laws before the courts get the chance to issue final rulings,” he said. “These are financial exchanges that offer financial instruments and operate across state lines. They match the bid from a resident of one state with the offer of a resident from another state and submit the trade to a clearinghouse that backstops the transactions of customers throughout the country. New York has no business regulating these interstate financial markets.”
The CFTC had previously sued New York over its stance on prediction markets.
New York sued Kalshi on July 31 after a federal judge ruled against Kalshi’s bid to block the state from filing a lawsuit. New York alleged that Kalshi was violating its state gambling laws by offering sports prediction markets.
“Kalshi has failed to obtain a license from the New York State Gaming Commission (Gaming Commission), sidestepping its obligation to pay taxes like licensed casinos and mobile sports gambling platforms do,” a press release from the state said. “This tax revenue from gambling regulation funds public schools, sports programs for underserved youth, and problem gambling education and treatment.”
Kalshi moved to transfer the case to federal court; New York moved to transfer the case back. The motions are currently awaiting a judge’s ruling.
-
Fashion4 days agoWeekend Open Thread: Mattifying Sunscreen
-
Fashion4 days agoFrugal Friday’s Workwear Report: Cap-Sleeve Pointelle Crewneck Sweater
-
Sports6 days agoJordan Coyle & Cordiamo take Laya Arena Stakes at RDS
-
News Videos4 days agoCan Astrology Help Find Gold and Silver Trends? A Financial Astrology Guide
-
Business6 days agoUS stocks: Dow closes at record on Mideast optimism; SpaceX, AMD drag Nasdaq
-
Politics6 days agoReform UK And Greens Sink To Lowest Favourability Ratings To Date
-
Business7 days agoNvidia Stock Climbs 2.5% as Chip Sector Rally Builds Ahead of AMD Earnings, Nvidia’s Own Report Looms
-
Tech7 days agoOpenAI, Anthropic AI agents targeted real people and systems in cyber tests
-
Business6 days agoSupply chain issues impact Ingredion
-
Tech4 days agoRinn Pharma & Biopharma to join NordicPharmaTrain network
-
Business3 days agoHow to Start a Cleaning Business: A Step-by-Step Guide
-
Crypto World7 days agoDow and S&P 500 Hit Records on AI Earnings: When Will the Bubble Burst?
-
Business3 days agoDatadog: Best Of Breed For Multiple Reasons
-
Business3 days agoBDC Weekly Review: Private BDC Q2 Numbers Are Strong
-
Business7 days agoMcDonald’s (MCD) Q2 2026 earnings
-
Crypto World7 days agoDollar Index Trapped at 100 as Hawkish Fed Meets Official Selling
-
Fashion7 days agoThe Bright Side of Black and White
-
Business7 days agoApple UK encryption challenge filed against Home Office
-
Fashion6 days agoSuit of the Week: Me + Em
-
Sports6 days ago
Spider-Man: Brand New Day ending explained: Is Peter Parker alive?

You must be logged in to post a comment Login