Crypto World
CLARITY Act Faces Senate Clock as Law Enforcement Pushes Back on DeFi Exemption
The White House invited law enforcement groups opposing the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act to a Monday meeting to resolve objections to Section 604, the provision drawn from the Blockchain Regulatory Certainty Act (BRCA) that shields software developers from money-transmitter classification.
Patrick Witt, the White House’s lead crypto adviser, is driving the engagement, but the bill still requires 60 Senate votes to pass, and roughly four weeks of floor time remain before the August recess.
Senate Majority Leader John Thune is reportedly prepared to bring the CLARITY Act to the floor in the coming weeks, regardless of whether Democrats are ready, according to Punchbowl News.
Banking Committee Chairman Tim Scott posted on X Monday that the Senate “should vote on crypto market structure legislation in July.” The urgency is real. The political math is harder.
The bill passed the House 294–134 on July 17, 2025, and cleared the Senate Banking Committee 15–9 on May 14, 2026. Those are comfortable margins in their respective chambers. The Senate floor is a different problem entirely.
Discover: The Best Token Presales
Section 604: The Provision That Stopped the Clock
Section 604 of the CLARITY Act, the BRCA provision, is where the legislative fight is concentrated. It would prevent software developers who do not exercise ultimate control over their tools from being classified as money transmitters under Bank Secrecy Act rules, a protection the crypto industry treats as foundational for continued DeFi development in the United States.
The National Sheriffs Association sent a May letter to Senate Banking Committee leaders stating: “No good reason supports giving mixers, tumblers, and DeFi a blanket exemption.
While some software developers are not engaged in money transmitting or other activity that should subject them to BSA regulation, plenty of others are.” The group was invited to a prior two-day White House session in June, but did not attend, which is why Monday’s targeted meeting exists.
The law enforcement argument is not that the BRCA protection is wrong in principle; it is that the current language is too broad. Investigators working on sanctions evasion and mixer-facilitated crime say the exemption, as written, blurs the enforcement boundary around developers whose tools are functionally indistinguishable from financial intermediaries.
That is not a fringe position; it is shared across multiple law enforcement organizations that attended the June White House sessions.
Patrick Witt’s counter-argument is that the bill adds new prosecutorial tools and that the current regulatory vacuum is itself the enforcement problem. “We’re putting real regulatory constraints on businesses and actors that currently live in a state of uncertainty,” Witt said at an industry event earlier this month.
To skeptical law enforcement officials, he argued they “should be the biggest cheerleaders for this bill, because this is really what is missing.” Whether that framing moves the National Sheriffs Association off its stated position is what Monday’s meeting is designed to test.
Three More Problems Beyond Section 604
The BRCA dispute is the most visible obstacle, but three additional issues remain unresolved. First, regarding the Commodity Futures Trading Commission staffing question, the bill’s provisions expand the CFTC’s jurisdiction over crypto market structure, and bringing the agency to full operational strength remains part of active negotiations.
Second, an ethics provision that would bar senior government officials, including the president, from holding personal crypto interests. Multiple lawmakers have stated explicitly that they will not vote for the bill without it, including the only Democrats who voted for the bill during the Senate Banking Committee markup.
That second point is the structural bind. The Democrats, whose votes the White House needs, are conditioning their support on a provision the White House may resist. Senators Catherine Cortez Masto and Mark Warner have both signaled that the ethics provision is a threshold requirement, not a negotiating chip. That is not resolved; it is deferred.

Third, Trump’s broader legislative posture adds a layer of uncertainty. His refusal to sign a major housing affordability bill, demanding a voter-identification bill first, has already disrupted one congressional timeline.
TD Cowen policy analyst Jaret Seiberg said Monday he expects the housing bill to become law through the constitutional ten-day automatic-passage window, projecting a Friday, July 10, effective date. Whether Trump applies the same resistance to the CLARITY Act is not yet clear, but the precedent is live.
Don’t Miss Out on Our $1,000 USDT Airdrop on ByBit
The post CLARITY Act Faces Senate Clock as Law Enforcement Pushes Back on DeFi Exemption appeared first on Cryptonews.
Crypto World
Bitcoin price holds near $60,000, but analyst warns break lower could target $40,000
Bitcoin is trading in a narrow range between $59,000 and $60,000 for the fifth straight day, a quiet stretch that some analysts warn is more dangerous than it looks because of where it is happening.
The range itself is normal. Bitcoin spent much of 2024, from March to October, consolidating between $55,000 and $70,000 with occasional overshoots in both directions. What makes the current setup riskier is its location, said Alex Kuptsikevich, chief market analyst at FxPro, in an email to CoinDesk.
This band sits below the levels that sparked rebounds in February and early this month, as well as the 50-day and 200-day moving averages. Traders closely watch the two averages, and both are sloping downward right now, indicating a bearish bias.
And that is the signature of a downtrend rather than a market building a base to climb from.
“This is a rather dangerous consolidation for the bulls,” Kuptsikevich said, noting that the 2024 version formed in a rising market while this one is forming in a falling one. If the pattern breaks lower rather than resolving higher, he said, the next meaningful step down is around $40,000.
Some onchain indicators suggest the same. Pseudonymous CryptoQuant analyst Darkfost flagged signs that long-term holders are starting to capitulate, or selling at a loss. In past cycles, this phase has marked attractive entry points for buyers, even as it signals near-term pain.
Crypto World
Small-cap stocks enjoy best first half since 1991 as AI trade expands
Traders work at the New York Stock Exchange on June 26, 2026.
NYSE
Small-cap U.S. stocks are capping off one of their strongest first halves in decades. But this is not your ordinary small-cap boom led by traditional businesses linked to the economic cycle.
This run, like the one going on with their larger-cap peers, has been driven by the rapid buildout of AI infrastructure, as spending spreads beyond the largest technology companies to a broader network of suppliers.
Investors believe the small-stock rally can broaden out beyond tech and continue, as long as interest rates stay in check.
The Russell 2000 Index has surged more than 21% this year, putting the benchmark on track for its best first-half performance since 1991. The advance marks a sharp turnaround after years of underperformance versus large-cap peers.
“It’s both a valuation catch-up story and a fundamental story,” said Amy Zhang, portfolio manager at Alger. “The valuation gap was so wide that a truck can drive through it. At the same time, fundamentals are improving in small caps and I think that’s why it’s causing the broadening trade.”
Semiconductor and semiconductor-equipment companies have been the biggest winners, underscoring how the AI investment boom is rippling through the broader market. Chip-related companies account for 16 of the Russell 2000’s 50 best-performing stocks this year, including Aehr Test Systems, Ichor Holdings and MaxLinear, which have all rallied more than 400%.
Rather than competing directly with industry leaders like Nvidia, many of these smaller companies are benefiting from rising demand across the AI supply chain. As chipmakers and cloud providers ramp up spending on AI infrastructure, suppliers of semiconductor equipment, components and connectivity solutions are seeing the gains trickle down, amplifying revenue and earnings growth for companies with much smaller market capitalizations.
“I think a significant part of the small cap story is tied to AI,” Zhang said. “The impact of AI investment trickles down from large-cap leaders to small-cap companies. The effect will be more amplified for small-cap companies, in terms of revenue and probability growth.”
More Than Just AI
While AI has been a key driver of the rally, strategists say the small-cap rebound has been supported by a broader set of fundamental tailwinds and can continue.
“Small-cap leadership has been notable amid the mega-cap-driven bull market, although small caps have meaningful exposure to semiconductors and technology hardware,” said Adam Turnquist, chief technical strategist at LPL Financial. “Building fundamental strength has also helped offset headwinds from higher rates.”
Consensus forecasts for Russell 2000 companies’ 2026 earnings growth have climbed to 38% from about 23% at the start of the year, according to LPL, reflecting growing optimism that profit growth is broadening beyond the largest technology companies.
Russell 2000 year to date
Turnquist also pointed to several other catalysts that could continue to support the asset class, including small caps’ greater exposure to the U.S. economy, expectations for increased merger-and-acquisition activity — particularly in the pharmaceutical and biotechnology industries — and tax incentives designed to encourage capital investment.
Higher rates a threat?
The biggest threat to the small-cap rally may be the same force that held the group back for years: higher interest rates.
The Federal Reserve next meets July 28-29, with traders pricing in about a 30% chance of a rate increase, according to CME Group’s FedWatch tool. By September, markets see more than a 60% probability of at least one quarter-point hike.
Higher borrowing costs pose a particular challenge for smaller companies, which generally carry more floating-rate debt and face greater refinancing needs than their large-cap peers. Bank of America estimates that every additional 25-basis-point hike would reduce Russell 2000 operating earnings by about 2%.
“This could challenge the expected 4Q profits acceleration (and sentiment) in small caps, which have the most refi risk,” Bank of America strategists said in a note.
Even so, many investors believe the worst of the tightening cycle is over. The Fed raised interest rates by a cumulative 500 basis points between March 2022 and mid-2023, one of the most aggressive hiking campaigns in decades.
“We’re probably close to peak inflation and peak rates,” Zhang said. “We had significant headwind the last five years, and I think the headwind is going to abate and turning into a tailwind.”
—With reporting by Deena Zaidi
Crypto World
A Look Inside Saylor’s Bitcoin Monetization Program: Strategy Files to Sell $1.25B in BTC
Bitcoin News: Michael Saylor’s Strategy (Nasdaq: MSTR) filed on June 29 to sell up to $1.25 billion worth of Bitcoin, framing the potential liquidation as a “Bitcoin Monetization Program” designed to bolster its cash reserve, cover preferred stock dividends, and service interest obligations.
The filing marks the most explicit structural retreat yet from the accumulate-at-all-costs playbook Saylor spent years selling to institutional and retail investors alike.
The proximate trigger was June 27, when Strategy’s mNAV, the ratio of its enterprise value to its Bitcoin holdings, fell below 1 for the first time.
That number is not just an optics problem. The entire capital model depended on trading at a premium to net Bitcoin value, which let the company issue equity and preferred stock to buy more BTC at accretive prices. With mNAV at 0.99, that flywheel has stalled.
Strategy’s cash reserve currently stands at approximately $2.55 billion. The company said any Bitcoin sales would be executed “from time to time” depending on market conditions and capital needs, language that keeps the door open without committing to a specific timeline or tranche size.
It also authorized two separate share repurchase programs of up to $1 billion each: one for its Class A common stock and one for its Digital Credit Securities, which cover the preferred stock series including STRK, STRF, and STRD.
The preferred stack is where the pressure concentrates. STRK carries an 8% annual dividend on roughly $584 million raised. STRF pays 10%, compounding to 18% if payments are missed, on $711 million raised. STRD, the most recent series, generated approximately $979.7 million in net proceeds at a 10% non-cumulative rate.
Combined, the annual preferred dividend burden exceeds $700 million. When Bitcoin was trading near its late-2025 highs around $125,000 and mNAV was firmly above 1, issuing new equity to cover those costs was trivially easy. At $60,000 Bitcoin with a sub-1 mNAV, it is not.
This is also not the first time Strategy has touched its Bitcoin treasury. On June 1 the company sold 32 BTC for approximately $2.5 million, a small transaction explicitly tied to funding preferred stock distributions. The June 29 filing raises the potential scale by several orders of magnitude.
Bitcoin price action heading into the filing had already done significant damage. BTC retested $58,000 last week alongside a $3 billion market outflow and a concurrent crash in MSTR shares, compressing Strategy’s NAV coverage at exactly the moment it needed room.
Bitcoin has since recovered modestly to approximately $60,175, but remains well off levels where Strategy’s model operated without friction. Options market structure around the $60,000 range has kept price action choppy, with no clean technical resolution yet.
Peter Schiff, gold advocate and longtime Bitcoin critic, did not miss the moment. In a June 29 post, Schiff said Strategy was “now a Bitcoin seller”, a pointed description given Saylor’s years of public messaging that Bitcoin should never be sold. Following the June 1 transaction, Schiff had written, “What Saylor giveth, Saylor taketh away,” arguing that the company’s aggressive accumulation had helped push Bitcoin price higher before this year’s reversal. His framing is polemical, but the underlying structural point, that Strategy’s buying was itself a price support mechanism that runs in reverse when the model flips, is not wrong.
Strategy has pushed back on the capitulation narrative, maintaining publicly that Bitcoin remains its “primary treasury reserve asset” and that liquidity management does not represent a change in long-term conviction.
The board also adopted a policy requiring at least 12 months of reserve coverage for preferred dividends and interest obligations. That is a meaningful governance shift toward balance-sheet discipline, and an implicit acknowledgment that market access can no longer be assumed.
MSTR shares traded at $82.31 at time of writing, down 3.5% on the day, continuing a sharp decline from the stock’s highs when Bitcoin was approaching $125,000. The contrast between those two data points tells the whole story: MSTR was not just a Bitcoin proxy, it was a leveraged bet on mNAV staying above 1. That condition no longer holds.
Discover: The Best Token Presales
Bitcoin News: MSTR, Does the $90 Level Hold, or Is the Model Still Repricing?
At $92, MSTR is holding just above what has emerged as near-term psychological support around $90. A breach of that level on volume would likely accelerate selling from holders who bought into the company as a premium Bitcoin vehicle, because the premium is now gone, and the equity offers neither the purity of direct BTC exposure nor the safety of a company generating operating cash flow to backstop the position.
The two $1 billion repurchase programs give management a tool to defend both the common stock and the preferred series, which is not nothing. Buybacks at these levels could provide a technical floor if deployed aggressively.
But repurchase authorization and actual deployment are different things, and the company’s first obligation is covering those preferred dividend payments before it can return capital to common holders.

The most likely near-term outcome is continued range-bound choppiness in MSTR between $80 and $89, with direction determined almost entirely by whether Bitcoin can reclaim $63,000 and hold it.
A recovery through that level would push mNAV back above 1 and reopen the equity issuance window. A continuation lower toward $55,000 would force a materially larger Bitcoin sale than the $1.25 billion ceiling currently authorized, and that scenario would likely reprice the entire preferred stack.
El Salvador, by contrast, has continued accumulating Bitcoin under IMF scrutiny, underscoring that not every institutional BTC holder faces the same structural constraints Strategy does. The next signal worth tracking is whether Strategy executes any material BTC sale in the coming two weeks and how the preferred series trades in response.
Don’t Miss Out on Our $1,000 USDT Airdrop on ByBit
Don’t Miss Out on Our $1,000 USDT Airdrop on ByBit
The post A Look Inside Saylor’s Bitcoin Monetization Program: Strategy Files to Sell $1.25B in BTC appeared first on Cryptonews.
Crypto World
Here’s why Kaspa price rallied 15% today
Kaspa price has surged about 15% over the past day as investors have positioned ahead of the network’s long-awaited Toccata hard fork despite continued weakness across the crypto market.
Summary
- Kaspa surged 15% as traders positioned ahead of the scheduled Toccata hard fork.
- Investors expect the upgrade to add smart contracts, KRC-20 tokens, and DeFi functionality.
- Technical buying and short covering helped KAS outperform a weak crypto market.
According to the Kaspa network, the Toccata hard fork is scheduled to activate on the mainnet at approximately 16:15 UTC on June 30. Exchanges including HTX temporarily suspended deposits and withdrawals ahead of the upgrade to support the transition.
The upgrade introduces native smart contract functionality through the SilverScript programming language, while also adding support for KRC-20 tokens, decentralized finance applications, and zero-knowledge privacy features.
Together, these additions remove one of the network’s biggest limitations by expanding Kaspa beyond its original role as a high-speed proof-of-work payment blockchain.
Toccata upgrade has changed Kaspa’s utility
With the hard fork approaching, trading activity has accelerated as investors position for higher on-chain activity. According to the Kaspa network, the upgrade is expected to enable developers to build decentralized applications directly on Kaspa by introducing native smart contract functionality, expanding the network beyond its traditional payment use case.
On-chain activity has also supported the bullish narrative. The network is approaching a cumulative milestone of roughly 2.35 billion transactions, demonstrating continued usage of its BlockDAG architecture even as new features are introduced. Supporters of the network have long argued that BlockDAG enables higher parallel transaction throughput than conventional blockchain designs, reducing congestion during periods of elevated demand.
The technical setup amplified the move. Before the hard fork, Kaspa had spent several months trading inside a prolonged consolidation range, with buyers repeatedly defending the $0.025-$0.030 area. The upgrade arrived while many derivatives traders remained positioned for further downside, creating conditions for a short squeeze as spot demand increased.
Forced liquidations of bearish positions added momentum to the rally once price broke above its recent trading range.
The daily chart also shows the recovery pushing KAS back above its 20-day simple moving average near $0.030 while testing resistance around the 50-day moving average near $0.0317. At the same time, the MACD has produced a bullish crossover with the histogram turning positive, indicating improving momentum.

Still, the token trades below its declining 100-day and 200-day moving averages, suggesting that a sustained trend reversal would require additional buying pressure.
Technical buying has outweighed macro headwinds
Kaspa’s rally has unfolded while much of the cryptocurrency market continues to struggle under an unfavorable macro backdrop. A stronger-than-expected 4.1% U.S. Core PCE inflation reading and the Federal Reserve’s hawkish policy stance under Chair Kevin Warsh have pressured risk assets in recent days, contributing to an estimated $1.79 billion in cumulative outflows from U.S. spot Bitcoin exchange-traded funds.
Unlike many proof-of-stake networks, however, Kaspa operates on a proof-of-work model with approximately 95.4% of its maximum supply already in circulation. With new token issuance steadily declining over time, the introduction of smart contracts and execution fees through the Toccata upgrade has strengthened the network’s utility without materially increasing supply.
Those supply dynamics, combined with renewed developer opportunities and short-covering activity, have helped Kaspa outperform most major cryptocurrencies even as capital has continued flowing out of other digital assets.
Whether the rally extends from here may depend on whether buyers can reclaim resistance around the 50-day and 100-day moving averages before challenging the longer-term 200-day average near $0.0353.
Disclosure: This article does not represent investment advice. The content and materials featured on this page are for educational purposes only.
Crypto World
Institutional demand for BTC is below supply as ETF outflows, new coins flood market: Crypto Daily
Though BTC has recently stabilized around $60,000, the prospects for a meaningful recovery remain bleak because institutional demand is falling significantly short of soaking up supply.
The latest chart by Glassnode shows that bitcoin exchange-traded funds (ETFs) have sold off 71,600 BTC, worth over $4 billion, this month, the largest redemption on record. Meanwhile, corporate treasuries, or digital asset treasury firms, have snapped up just 7,500 BTC. Add to that the fresh coins mined each day, and the net figure comes to around -77,000 BTC ($4.4 billion).
In other words, more supply is hitting the market than the biggest players are absorbing, creating what analysts call a “supply overhang.” Big-money vehicles are actually adding to the selling pressure.
Against this backdrop, Strategy (MSTR), the largest bitcoin digital asset company, announced a BTC monetization plan on Monday, authorizing up to $1.25 billion in potential bitcoin sales, mainly to build a $2.55 billion U.S. dollar reserve to cover preferred dividends and interest expenses.
These developments suggest that any price bounce is likely to be short-lived, unless those flows flip positive and institutional demand returns. It’s a key signal for traders watching whether the recovery has real fuel or is just temporary.
Crypto World
Australia crypto travel rule starts July 1 as exchanges add transfer checks
Australia’s crypto travel rule comes into force on July 1, adding new data checks for users who send or receive digital assets through regulated exchanges.
Summary
- Australia’s crypto travel rule starts July 1, adding new data checks for exchange transfers.
- Exchanges must collect sender, receiver and wallet details before processing covered virtual asset transfers.
- Self-custody remains allowed, but transfers touching regulated platforms will face more user checks.
AUSTRAC’s transitional rules say some obligations for new virtual asset services were deferred until July 1, including travel rule obligations for virtual asset transfers.
The change affects virtual asset service providers with a link to Australia. AUSTRAC says covered services include crypto-to-fiat exchange, crypto-to-crypto exchange, safekeeping services, transfer services and certain services linked to token offers.
Exchanges must collect transfer details
Under AUSTRAC’s travel rule guidance, businesses that transfer money, virtual assets or property for customers must collect, verify and pass on key information about the transfer. AUSTRAC says the rule helps create transparency across the transfer chain and gives regulators and law enforcement access to needed data.
For virtual asset transfers, AUSTRAC says ordering institutions must check whether the receiving wallet is custodial or self-hosted. They must also carry out due diligence and pass on required information when the other institution is properly licensed or not required to be licensed.
Self-custody transfers face extra checks
Transfers to self-hosted wallets receive different treatment. AUSTRAC says a business does not need to send information to another business in the transfer chain when the transfer goes to a self-hosted wallet. However, the ordering institution must still collect and verify payer information and collect payee and tracing information.
This is the point drawing user concern online. Trader Greeny wrote on X that “crypto in Australia changes forever” and said small transfers would face the same data checks as larger transfers. Separate compliance summaries also state that Australia has no transaction threshold for the crypto travel rule, meaning the rule applies regardless of transfer size.
Users debate privacy and compliance
Reddit posts show mixed reactions from Australian crypto users. One user wrote, “you can forget about sending crypto anonymously,” while another said “the regulated platforms were never anonymous.” The comments reflect a split between users focused on privacy and others who view exchange reporting as expected under financial crime rules.
AUSTRAC has also updated broader reporting systems. The agency said it received more than 2 million threshold transaction reports and over 450,000 suspicious matter reports last year, and those figures may rise as more businesses fall under the framework from July 1.
Broader crypto rules are tightening
Australia’s travel rule arrives as the country moves toward broader crypto licensing. As reported by crypto.news, ASIC recently extended temporary licensing relief for crypto firms until Sept. 30, giving companies more time to apply for financial services licenses.
As previously reported by crypto.news, Australia’s Senate committee also backed a bill that would bring crypto exchanges and tokenized custody platforms under the country’s financial services licensing regime. That framework targets platforms that hold customer assets and requires governance, disclosure and custody standards.
The July 1 rule does not ban self-custody or crypto transfers. It changes how regulated platforms handle transfers when user assets enter or leave those platforms. For Australian users, the near-term change is practical: exchanges may ask for more details before processing deposits or withdrawals.
Crypto World
Bitcoin Open Interest Drops Below Half of July Peak as Market Deleveraging Continues
TL;DR
- Bitcoin open interest has dropped from nearly $45 billion to $20.4 billion, reflecting a major reduction in market leverage.
- The decline followed several liquidation events that gradually unwound leveraged futures positions.
- Bitcoin’s price and open interest have fallen at a similar pace, pointing to an orderly deleveraging process.
- Despite the sharp reduction in leverage, the data does not confirm that Bitcoin has reached a market bottom.
The Bitcoin (BTC) futures market has undergone a significant reduction in leverage, with open interest declining from a peak of nearly $45 billion in July 2025 to approximately $20.4 billion, according to CryptoQuant data. The decline reflects a broad unwinding of leveraged positions rather than a sudden market collapse, as both Bitcoin’s price and open interest have fallen at a comparable pace.
Open interest represents the total notional value of outstanding futures contracts. A decline in this metric indicates that positions are being closed, either through liquidations or traders voluntarily reducing exposure. The latest data shows that more than 45% of peak leverage has been removed from the market.
Open Interest Decline Mirrors Bitcoin’s Price Correction
CryptoQuant’s data shows that the reduction in open interest coincided with several notable liquidation events over the past year. The largest occurred on October 10, when Bitcoin fell from an all-time high near $122,574 to roughly $105,000 following record single-day liquidations.

The deleveraging continued into early February, when open interest declined by more than 20% within days as Bitcoin dropped to around $61,000. Additional liquidations through June further reduced outstanding futures positions, bringing total open interest down to approximately $20.4 billion.
According to the data, leverage and Bitcoin’s price have declined at a similar rate throughout the period. This pattern suggests that excess leverage has been gradually removed from the market instead of triggering a disorderly selloff where prices fall much faster than positions are unwound.
Data Shows Deleveraging Has Continued, but Does Not Confirm a Market Bottom
Despite the sharp decline in leverage, the available data does not indicate that Bitcoin has reached a market bottom. Historical observations note that falling open interest has previously been followed by extended periods of sideways trading or additional price declines before a sustained recovery emerged.
Current open interest also remains well above the levels recorded during 2023, when it fell to roughly $10 billion, indicating that further deleveraging remains possible based on historical comparisons.
Meanwhile, the weekly Bitcoin price chart shows the asset trading below $60,000, just below the $68,000–$70,000 range, an area that served as a previous support and resistance zone.

Bitcoin was changing hands at approximately $59,227 as of press time as prices continued to struggle, while volume delta remained negative, reflecting continued selling pressure during the period shown.
Crypto World
Solana price eyes breakout after tokenized stock boom fuels 18% rally
Solana price has extended its recovery to nearly 18% over the past week as record tokenized stock activity and growing institutional adoption helped the token outperform a crypto market still weighed down by macroeconomic uncertainty.
Summary
- Solana price has rallied nearly 18% as record tokenized stock trading boosted network activity and investor demand.
- Technical indicators show bulls testing key resistance between $76 and $80, with liquidation clusters adding volatility.
- Analysts see room for further gains, though macroeconomic uncertainty and weaker support levels remain key risks.
According to data from crypto.news, Solana (SOL) climbed from a local low near $64 on June 25 to an intraday high of $75.8 on June 30 before easing back toward the $73 region. Its rebound came while Bitcoin remained below $60,000 following another failed breakout attempt, allowing SOL to stand out as one of the few large-cap cryptocurrencies to post a strong weekly gain.
One catalyst behind the move came from Solana’s tokenized asset ecosystem. The network processed a record $1.36 billion in weekly tokenized equity volume, accounting for roughly 96% of all on-chain stock trading during the period. The surge in real-world asset activity increased on-chain transactions and demand for SOL as the network’s native gas token, adding a source of organic spot buying beyond speculative trading.
Institutional adoption also continued to build. Spot Solana exchange-traded funds managed by firms including Bitwise and Fidelity surpassed $1.06 billion in combined assets under management. Unlike spot Bitcoin ETFs, several Solana products distribute staking rewards to shareholders, giving investors an additional yield component alongside price exposure.
Additionally, MoneyGram joined the network as a validator while Toss Bank expanded its use of Solana infrastructure for cross-border stablecoin remittances, adding another layer of long-term network participation.
Real-world asset growth has boosted demand for Solana
The 1-day chart shows Solana rebounding sharply after defending support near $64 earlier this week. Price has reclaimed the 20-day simple moving average around $70.9 and is trading above it, while the Chaikin Money Flow has climbed back into positive territory at 0.17, suggesting capital has returned after weeks of persistent selling pressure.

Yet, SOL remains below the 50-day, 100-day and 200-day moving averages near $76.4, $81.0 and $94.6 respectively, leaving a heavy resistance band overhead.
The 4-hour chart paints a constructive short-term picture despite Tuesday’s pullback. Solana completed a strong recovery from the June 25 low and briefly pushed above the 0.786 Fibonacci retracement level at $73.85 before reaching $76.49.

Momentum has eased since then, with the MACD histogram beginning to contract while the RSI has slipped to around 55 after briefly approaching overbought territory. Holding above the 0.618 Fibonacci level near $71.8 would keep the current recovery intact, while a sustained move above $76.5 could expose the next psychological resistance near $80.
Derivatives positioning suggests volatility may not be over. CoinGlass liquidation data shows dense short liquidation clusters between $74 and $76, helping explain the sharp squeeze that carried SOL to its weekly high. Another sizeable concentration of leveraged positions sits around the $72 area, while heavier long liquidation pockets extend toward $69 and $66.

A clean break above $76 could trigger another wave of short liquidations, whereas losing $72 may accelerate downside as leveraged longs begin to unwind.
Commenting on the market structure, well-followed analyst Michaël van de Poppe wrote:
“The flip is an easy buy opportunity for me, but overall, I think that the markets are looking to get more upside momentum and I would expect $120-130 as a potential target area in Q3/Q4 of this year.”
Another optimistic assessment came from fellow analyst Ardi, who argued Solana could be repeating Ethereum’s 2022 recovery pattern. He noted that reclaiming the 21-week exponential moving average near $85 would strengthen the case that SOL has already established its cycle low.
Support at $72 remains crucial for the bullish outlook
Despite Solana’s relative strength, macro conditions continue to present meaningful risks. Markets remain under pressure after the latest U.S. Core PCE inflation reading came in above expectations, reinforcing the possibility that the Federal Reserve could keep interest rates elevated for longer. Rising Treasury yields and continued demand for defensive assets have already weighed on cryptocurrencies, with Bitcoin struggling to regain the $60,000 level.
From a technical standpoint, failure to hold above the $71.8-$72 support region would weaken the current recovery and shift attention back toward $69 and the recent swing low near $64.
On the upside, reclaiming the cluster of moving averages between $76 and $81 would provide the first convincing signal that Solana’s recent rally is developing into a broader trend reversal rather than another relief bounce within its longer-term downtrend.
Disclosure: This article does not represent investment advice. The content and materials featured on this page are for educational purposes only.
Crypto World
Michigan Judge Halts Kalshi’s Sports Betting for State Residents
A Michigan judge has temporarily blocked Kalshi from allowing residents to place bets on sporting events while the state pursues claims that the platform is violating gambling laws. The decision, issued by Ingham County Circuit Court Judge Rosemarie Aquilina, is set to last 14 days and expires on July 13.
According to a court filing provided through a Thomson Reuters Law360 document, the court said Kalshi could be fined $120,000 for each day it fails to meet the order’s geolocation requirements. Aquilina also argued that Michigan residents risk “irreparable harm” by being “exploited by Kalshi’s sports betting operation masquerading as an investment opportunity.”
Key takeaways
- Michigan’s temporary restraining order halts Kalshi’s sports event betting for now and emphasizes compliance with geolocation requirements.
- Kalshi faces financial exposure under the order, with a cited $120,000-per-day penalty for noncompliance.
- The move follows similar court-ordered pressure in Nevada and ongoing litigation involving multiple prediction market platforms.
- Prediction market sports activity has surged during the FIFA World Cup, with record trading volumes reported by Dune.
- Regulatory scrutiny is intensifying as states and the CFTC challenge the legal classification of event contracts.
Michigan’s temporary block targets geolocation compliance
Ingham County Circuit Court Judge Rosemarie Aquilina granted a temporary restraining order against Kalshi, restricting the company’s sports betting-related offerings to Michigan residents. The court order is tied to geolocation rules, meaning the platform must ensure users are properly excluded or restricted based on location before the order runs its course.
Per the filing, failure to comply can trigger substantial daily penalties. The order’s short duration—14 days—signals an escalation rather than a final resolution, but it also adds immediate operational risk for prediction market operators that rely on broad national access.
Michigan’s action also fits into a wider pattern: regulators and courts across the US have been testing where prediction markets fall within gambling law frameworks, even when operators frame their products as market-like event contracts.
Kalshi joins a growing list of prediction market legal setbacks
This latest Michigan development adds to the pressure Kalshi has faced in other jurisdictions. The article’s referenced reporting notes that Nevada issued a temporary ban on Kalshi earlier in March, making Michigan the second state to impose a court-ordered restriction on Kalshi’s sports event contracts.
Beyond Kalshi, the broader prediction market sector is also under legal scrutiny. On June 17, Kentucky sued five prediction market platforms—including Kalshi and Polymarket—accusing them of operating unlicensed sports betting. According to the same coverage, more than a dozen other states have also taken prediction market operators to court.
Federal regulators are involved as well. The US Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) has sued several states, arguing that event contracts already subject to federal oversight fall under the CFTC’s exclusive authority.
For users and traders, the practical effect is uncertainty about where and how these markets can legally operate. For operators, it raises compliance burdens and can force changes to access controls, product design, or both—especially when courts act quickly through temporary restraining orders.
World Cup momentum lifts prediction market volumes
While court cases continue to unfold, trading activity in prediction markets has remained active during major sporting events. The article points to sports betting activity rising in prediction markets since the start of the FIFA World Cup.
According to Dune data cited in the report, daily taker volume—a measure of contracts bought or sold by traders filling existing orders—reached a record $713 million on June 20. That high point came more than a week after the tournament started on June 11.
On a broader time basis, the report also cites Defirate data showing sports as the leading category on two of the largest prediction markets. Monthly sports betting volume rose 40% to $9.5 billion on Kalshi and increased 175% to $5.3 billion on Polymarket.
Separately, a referenced Bernstein report predicted that the 2026 FIFA World Cup would generate more than $3 billion in incremental sports betting handle and add between $5 billion and $10 billion in consumer prediction market volume. While that forecast focuses on a future tournament, the World Cup’s current trading lift provides evidence that such demand forecasts may be based on repeatable patterns rather than one-off hype.
From betting to crypto onboarding: new users find the chain
The surge in World Cup-linked trading is also tied, in at least one dataset, to crypto user discovery. The report states that Polymarket has acted as an onboarding layer for new cryptocurrency users, with about 60% of World Cup bettors interacting with the blockchain for the first time during their prediction market entry.
That figure comes from a Bitget Wallet study of 857,000 users, shared with Cointelegraph. The report adds that the “World Cup winner” contract alone generated over $3.5 billion in trading volume on Polymarket, based on platform data for the event.
These points matter because they underscore a key tension in the regulatory debate: prediction markets are often marketed as a trading experience, yet the mechanics frequently route users through blockchain-based infrastructure. Even when users treat the activity as entertainment or wagering, it can still create measurable crypto engagement—potentially increasing the visibility of these markets to regulators.
What to watch next
With Michigan’s restraining order set to expire on July 13 and new enforcement dynamics playing out across states, the next critical question is whether courts move from short-term blocks to longer remedies, and how prediction market platforms adjust geolocation and access controls under mounting legal pressure.
Crypto World
Uber (UBER) Terminates Waymo Robotaxi Partnership in Phoenix Market
Key Takeaways
- Uber has terminated its autonomous vehicle collaboration with Alphabet’s Waymo in Phoenix, Arizona.
- The rideshare company is currently arranging a replacement autonomous vehicle partnership in Phoenix with an undisclosed provider.
- Waymo robotaxis continue operating through Uber’s platform in Austin and Atlanta markets.
- The partnership dissolution comes after Waymo issued a recall affecting approximately 3,900 self-driving vehicles due to software defects.
- Analysts maintain a Strong Buy rating on UBER stock with projected upside of 43.2%, though shares are down 8% in 2026.
Uber Technologies (UBER) shares declined 0.92% following confirmation that the rideshare giant has discontinued its autonomous vehicle collaboration with Alphabet’s (GOOGL) Waymo subsidiary in the Phoenix, Arizona market. Meanwhile, GOOGL shares rose 4.82%, though this movement doesn’t appear connected to the partnership termination.
The dissolution of the Phoenix arrangement concludes a collaboration initially established in 2023. That original agreement integrated Waymo’s self-driving vehicles into Uber’s ride-hailing ecosystem and food delivery operations.
According to a Waymo representative, the autonomous vehicles previously deployed in the Phoenix pilot program have been reintegrated into Waymo’s proprietary fleet. Phoenix residents can continue accessing these robotaxis exclusively through Waymo’s dedicated application rather than Uber’s platform.
Phoenix’s Role as First Test Market
The Phoenix market served as the inaugural testing ground for the Uber-Waymo collaboration. An Uber representative characterized the deployment as “an intentionally limited deployment,” involving approximately a dozen vehicles specifically allocated to this pilot program.
This relatively modest fleet size reflects the experimental nature of the Phoenix operation compared to Uber’s broader self-driving vehicle strategy. Despite terminating the Waymo arrangement, Uber maintains its commitment to autonomous vehicle services in Phoenix. The company is currently finalizing arrangements with an alternative AV provider, though the partner’s identity remains undisclosed.
Waymo’s robotaxis haven’t been completely removed from Uber’s service offerings. Customers in Austin and Atlanta can still access Waymo’s autonomous vehicles through the Uber application.
The partnership termination timing carries significance. This development follows Waymo’s recent recall of nearly 3,900 self-driving vehicles nationwide.
The recall targeted a software malfunction that potentially allowed vehicles to enter closed freeway construction areas and continue operating. Reuters identified the recall as contextual background for the Phoenix partnership dissolution, though neither organization has explicitly connected these events.
Uber’s Comprehensive Autonomous Vehicle Approach
Uber has been aggressively expanding its autonomous vehicle partnership portfolio beyond Waymo. Current collaborators include Rivian, Amazon’s Zoox division, China-based Pony.AI, and Croatian startup Verne.
Notably absent from Uber’s AV partner roster is Tesla. The rideshare platform has not established any robotaxi arrangements with Elon Musk’s electric vehicle manufacturer.
During the first quarter 2026 earnings conference call, CEO Dara Khosrowshahi provided growth metrics to investors. He reported that autonomous vehicle mobility trips facilitated through Uber’s platform surged more than 1,000% compared to the previous year.
Uber currently operates autonomous ride services across eight metropolitan areas. Management has outlined expansion objectives to reach up to 15 cities before year-end.
Wall Street analysts remain optimistic about Uber’s prospects despite the stock’s challenging 2026 performance. The Strong Buy consensus recommendation reflects 28 Buy ratings alongside only two Hold ratings.
The average analyst price target stands at $108.12, suggesting potential upside of 43.2% from present trading levels.
UBER shares have declined 8% year-to-date, contrasting with the favorable analyst outlook. The company has not provided a timeline for revealing its new Phoenix autonomous vehicle partnership.
-
Sports7 days agoTwo goals and an assist by sheer aura: Cristiano Ronaldo just entered the World Cup chat
-
Fashion4 days agoWeekend Open Thread: Staud – Corporette.com
-
Politics4 days agoThe House | Manchesterism won’t survive the painful trade-offs unless it gets citizens on board
-
Politics4 days agoPotential 2028er World Cup attendee leaderboard
-
News Videos2 days agoMAJOR BITCOIN & MARKET UPDATE!!!! (MUST WATCH ASAP!!!)
-
Business4 days agoAsia stock markets slide as tech shares slump
-
Tech5 days agoA Look At A Gaggle Of Transputer Boards
-
Crypto World6 days agoSecuritize Wraps Roubini's SEC-Registered ETF as Dubai VARA Digital Security
-
Crypto World6 days ago
Bitcoin (BTC) Dips Below $62K, Ethereum (ETH) Plunges 6% Daily: Market Watch
-
Crypto World5 days ago
Dell (DELL) Shares Tumble Over 5% Following Analyst Downgrade to Hold
-
Crypto World3 days agoCoinbase, Circle Deepen Crypto Stock Losses Despite Resilient S&P 500
-
Business6 days ago
Entergy settles forward sale agreements, raises $672 million in cash proceeds
-
Crypto World3 days agoKraken's xStocks Opens Bending Spoons IPO Registration to EEA Retail
-
Sports4 days agoFIH Pro League: India defeat Pakistan 7-1, register biggest win of campaign | Other Sports News
-
Crypto World4 days agoBitcoin Sparks $600M Hourly Liquidations With $65,000 Set To Become Resistance
-
Tech2 days agoBluekit phishing kit adopts browser-in-the-middle for login theft
-
Tech3 days agoRussian hackers now target Signal backup recovery keys
-
Crypto World4 days agoHyperliquid Named on Singapore MAS Investor Alert Register
-
Crypto World4 days agoRTX holders must register wallets before token distribution begins
-
Crypto World5 days agoRipple and SBI launch RLUSD in Japan after JFSA approval


You must be logged in to post a comment Login