Crypto World
Coinbase posts $359M Q2 loss as revenue misses again
The exchange hit record market share and crossed $100 million in prediction market revenue, but a $1.36 per share loss and declining transaction fees show the Everything Exchange still runs on a shrinking engine.
Summary
- Coinbase reported a $359.5 million GAAP net loss in Q2 2026, missing consensus estimates by a wide margin with earnings per share of negative $1.36 versus expectations near breakeven.
- Total revenue fell 18.5% year over year to $1.22 billion, marking the third consecutive quarterly miss against Wall Street forecasts.
- Crypto trading volume market share hit an all time high of 10.3%, up from 9.1% in Q1, even as spot volumes across the industry declined 25% quarter over quarter.
- Subscription and services revenue reached a record 48% of net revenue, with average USDC held on the platform hitting an all time high of $20 billion.
- Prediction markets revenue grew 106% quarter over quarter, crossing $100 million in annualized run rate, while Coinbase ditched the traditional earnings call for a live AMA on X.
Coinbase delivered its third consecutive quarter of missed revenue estimates on July 30, posting a $359.5 million net loss that turned a year of strategic diversification into a question about whether any amount of product expansion can offset a sustained decline in trading fees.
The headline numbers were difficult to frame positively. Revenue of $1.22 billion missed consensus by roughly $80 million. Earnings per share came in at negative $1.36, far below estimates that ranged from negative $0.01 to positive $0.14 depending on the source. Adjusted EBITDA of $207.8 million missed by 31%. The stock dropped more than 5% in after hours trading before partially recovering the following day.
Yet beneath the miss, the structural story is changing. Bitcoin now accounts for just 12% of total revenue, down from more than 50% historically. Subscription and services revenue has grown from $6 million per quarter in 2020 to $555 million today. Prediction markets crossed $100 million in annualized revenue. The company Brian Armstrong calls the Everything Exchange is genuinely becoming one. The question is whether it is becoming one fast enough to survive the quarters when its original business contracts.
The revenue miss, decomposed
The $80 million revenue gap was not concentrated in a single segment. It was distributed across nearly every line item, suggesting the problem was market wide conditions, not a specific operational failure.
Transaction revenue came in at $599 million against an estimate of $640 million. Consumer trading, still the largest single revenue source at $452 million, missed by $40 million and declined 30.5% year over year. The total crypto market capitalization fell 11% during the quarter, and spot trading volumes dropped 25%. Coinbase was swimming against a current that pulled the entire industry down.
Institutional trading was the exception. Revenue of $100 million beat estimates of $116 million in absolute terms but represented a 64.6% year over year increase. Coinbase is gaining institutional share even in a declining volume environment, a pattern that suggests its expansion into tokenized stocks and international markets is generating durable demand instead of speculative volume.
Subscription and services revenue of $555 million missed its $601 million estimate by roughly $45 million. Within that category, stablecoin revenue of $292 million came in below the $339 million consensus, down 12.1% year over year. The $47 million stablecoin miss was the largest single line item shortfall in the subscription segment and represents the first time USDC revenue has disappointed at this scale since the revenue sharing arrangement with Circle began generating material income.
Blockchain revenue of $83 million missed by $13 million and declined 42.3% year over year, reflecting lower activity on Base chain during the broader market cooldown. Other transaction revenue of $47 million also came in light at $53 million estimated. Only interest and finance fees, at $66 million, beat estimates, rising 11.5% year over year. The interest income beat is a direct consequence of elevated USDC balances earning yield in a high rate environment, a tailwind that could reverse if the Federal Reserve begins cutting rates.
The market share paradox
The most striking number in the report was not the loss. It was the 10.3% crypto trading volume market share, an all time record and the third consecutive quarter of gains.
This creates a genuine paradox. Coinbase is winning a larger share of a shrinking market. In Q1, market share was 9.1% on roughly $1.93 billion in revenue. In Q2, market share rose to 10.3% on $1.22 billion. Revenue fell 36.8% quarter over quarter while market share increased by 1.2 percentage points. The math is stark. A rising share of a declining pie still means a smaller serving.
The paradox matters because it defines the investment thesis. If you believe crypto trading volumes are cyclical and will recover, Coinbase is building a dominant position that will compound on the upswing. If you believe the fee compression that characterizes mature markets has arrived permanently, the market share record is a consolation prize.
The competitive dynamics behind the market share gain deserve scrutiny. Coinbase achieved the record during a quarter when derivatives trading volumes hit an all time high for the third consecutive quarter. The exchange is no longer competing solely on spot trading, where fee pressure from zero commission competitors has been relentless. Derivatives, institutional prime brokerage, and international expansion are all contributing to the share number in ways that did not exist two years ago.
The evidence from Q2 favors the cyclical interpretation. Monthly transacting users of 7.6 million missed the 8.15 million estimate, but assets on platform of $245.9 billion, while below the $295 billion consensus, still represent an enormous custody position. Coinbase stores more cryptocurrency than any other company in the world. The $50 billion gap between actual and expected assets on platform reflects bitcoin price declines, not customer departures. When volumes return, it will capture them at a rate no competitor can match.
The stock price reflected Wall Street’s difficulty in reconciling these contradictions. Shares dropped from $160.09 to $155.16 in after hours trading, a 5.15% decline, before rebounding to $163.58 the following day. The 52 week range of $139.18 to $402.16 captures the full spectrum of market sentiment about Coinbase: from existential concern during drawdowns to euphoric conviction during rallies. At a market capitalization of roughly $42 billion, Coinbase trades at approximately 8.7 times trailing revenue, a premium that assumes the Everything Exchange thesis will eventually deliver.
The subscription pivot reaches 48%
The story Coinbase has been telling investors for two years is that it is evolving beyond a trading fee business. Q2 provided the strongest evidence yet that this transformation is real, even if it is not yet sufficient.
Subscription and services revenue represented 48% of net revenue, up from 29% just seven quarters earlier in Q4 2024. The shift is structural, not cosmetic. In Q2 2020, subscription and services generated $6 million per quarter. Six years later, it generates $555 million. That is a 92 fold increase in a business segment that barely existed when Coinbase went public.
The composition of that revenue is important. USDC related income remains the largest component at $292 million. Average USDC held on the platform reached an all time high of $20 billion, representing more than 30% of all USDC in circulation. Coinbase captures approximately 50% of all USDC economics through its relationship with Circle.
The stablecoin business is also gaining broader tailwinds. Market stablecoin transaction volume reached $37 trillion year to date, with 79% flowing through USDC and partner stablecoins, up from 51% in full year 2024. Base chain stablecoin volume rose 7x year over year. These are not Coinbase specific numbers. They are infrastructure adoption metrics that compound regardless of crypto price direction.
The significance of the USDC position becomes clearer when viewed through the lens of revenue durability. Unlike trading fees, which evaporate when volumes decline, stablecoin revenue is a function of USDC in circulation and the interest rate environment. As long as USDC balances remain elevated and interest rates stay above zero, Coinbase earns yield on reserves. The Fed’s sustained rate environment has made this revenue stream more valuable than Coinbase’s early projections anticipated.
But the stablecoin revenue miss of $47 million below consensus also reveals vulnerability. If interest rates decline or USDC loses market share to competing stablecoins, Coinbase’s highest margin business could contract. The entry of traditional financial players like Visa into the stablecoin infrastructure market introduces competitive pressure that did not exist twelve months ago. Coinbase’s bet is that its head start, its custody position, and its platform distribution will be sufficient to maintain USDC dominance.
Prediction markets and the new growth engine
The fastest growing segment in the quarter was also the newest. Prediction markets revenue grew 106% quarter over quarter, crossing $100 million in annualized run rate. The crypto binaries product, launched during the quarter, generated three times the daily traders and four times the daily revenue compared to its May average within weeks of launch.
This segment is worth watching for reasons beyond the topline number. Prediction markets operate on a fundamentally different cycle than crypto spot trading. They are event driven rather than price driven. A regulatory crackdown on competitors like Kalshi could accelerate the shift of prediction market volume toward regulated platforms like Coinbase. New York’s lawsuit seeking $36 billion in damages from Kalshi, combined with 38 state attorneys general aligned against prediction market operators, creates a regulatory moat that benefits companies already holding federal registrations and exchange licenses.
The fact that prediction markets generated $100 million in annualized revenue during a quarter when crypto spot volumes fell 25% suggests the business may be naturally counter cyclical. Political events, sports outcomes, and economic indicators create trading catalysts that are orthogonal to crypto price cycles. If Coinbase can sustain 100% quarter over quarter growth for even two more quarters, prediction markets would become a meaningful contributor to total revenue rather than a rounding error.
Coinbase One subscribers also crossed one million for the first time, another recurring revenue stream that is less sensitive to crypto price movements. The subscription product bundles zero fee trading, higher staking rewards, and priority support, essentially converting volatile transaction revenue into predictable subscription revenue. The one million subscriber milestone, combined with the $100 million prediction market run rate, suggests Coinbase is building multiple independent revenue engines that do not require crypto prices to rise for the company to grow.
The cost structure under pressure
The loss was not driven solely by declining revenue. Coinbase’s cost structure amplified the impact of the miss.
Operating margin deteriorated to negative 9.3%, down from negative 1.6% a year earlier. Transaction expenses consumed 16% of net revenue. Sales and marketing spending was dialed back in Q2 in response to market conditions, but the pullback was not sufficient to offset the revenue decline. The operating leverage that makes Coinbase profitable in strong markets works in reverse during weak ones. Fixed costs for compliance, engineering, and infrastructure do not scale down proportionally when trading volume falls 25%.
The balance sheet remains strong. Cash and equivalents of $8.6 billion, with total available resources of approximately $10 billion, provide a substantial buffer against an extended downturn. For context, the $10 billion in available resources exceeds one full year of total operating expenses at the current run rate. Coinbase could theoretically operate for more than twelve months with zero revenue before facing a liquidity constraint. No other publicly traded crypto company has a comparable cash position.
The company has maintained 14 consecutive quarters of positive adjusted EBITDA, a streak that survived even this quarter’s GAAP loss. The distinction matters. GAAP accounting includes non cash charges, particularly stock based compensation and unrealized losses on crypto holdings, that adjusted EBITDA excludes. The gap between reported profitability and cash generation is widening as Coinbase increases equity compensation to retain engineers during headcount reductions.
Free cash flow of $197.3 million at a 16.2% margin remained positive, down 5.8 percentage points year over year but still meaningfully above zero. Coinbase is not burning cash despite the macro pressure. It is generating less of it. The company’s ability to remain free cash flow positive during a quarter that produced a $359.5 million GAAP loss speaks to the underlying economics of the business model. Custody fees, staking revenue, and USDC economics generate cash regardless of whether Coinbase reports a profit or loss under GAAP rules.
The X AMA and what it signals
Coinbase replaced its traditional earnings call with a live AMA on X, the first major public company to do so for a quarterly earnings report. The format shift was not random. It was a statement about who Coinbase considers its primary audience.
Traditional earnings calls are designed for institutional analysts. They follow a scripted format: prepared remarks, then questions from buy side and sell side analysts who have been pre screened by investor relations. The X AMA inverted that hierarchy. Brian Armstrong took questions from anyone in the replies, including retail investors, crypto developers, and critics.
Armstrong used the format to deliver the quarter’s most quotable line: “Coinbase is no longer a bet just on the price of Bitcoin. All of financial services are getting updated by crypto technology, whether that is trading or payments or lending. And Coinbase is the best positioned company in the world to power this.”
He also emphasized the diversification narrative: “We are diversifying revenue both on the trading fee side and on subscription and services with non trading fees.” The framing was deliberate. In a quarter where every line item missed estimates, the message was that missing by less next time will require looking at a different set of numbers.
The claim is ambitious. But the numbers partially support it. With bitcoin at 12% of revenue, prediction markets at $100 million annualized, USDC generating $292 million per quarter, and institutional trading growing 64.6% year over year, the diversification strategy is producing measurable results. The problem is that all of these new revenue streams combined still could not offset a quarter of declining trading fees. The Everything Exchange is still powered primarily by the original engine, and that engine runs slower when crypto prices fall.
The engineering efficiency argument
Buried in the shareholder materials was a data point that received almost no analyst attention: pull requests per engineer increased 2.2 times year over year, and integration test coverage grew 2.5 times in six months.
These are operational metrics, not financial ones. But they matter for the long term thesis. Coinbase’s strategy requires it to ship products faster than market conditions can erode its core business. If the Everything Exchange needs prediction markets, tokenized stocks, agentic payments, and international expansion to work simultaneously, it needs an engineering organization that can execute on multiple fronts without proportional headcount growth.
The 14% workforce reduction announced earlier in the quarter makes the productivity data more significant. Coinbase is cutting headcount while increasing output per engineer. The new CTO appointment that accompanied the layoffs signals a deliberate shift toward smaller, more productive teams instead of the growth at all costs hiring pattern that characterized the 2021 bull market.
If the trend holds, it suggests the cost structure can improve even without revenue recovery. A company that ships twice as much code with 14% fewer engineers is building operating leverage that does not appear in quarterly revenue figures but compounds over time.
The Singapore expansion provides a concrete example of how engineering efficiency translates into market access. Coinbase announced plans to grow its Singapore workforce to 200 by year end 2026, focusing on compliance engineering and product localization. If a smaller but more productive engineering team can support simultaneous launches in Canada, Singapore, and other international markets, the per market cost of expansion falls materially. The Everything Exchange thesis depends on geographic reach as much as product breadth. Engineering efficiency is the prerequisite for both.
The question is whether engineering velocity translates into product market fit across enough segments to offset the structural decline in consumer trading fees. Shipping code faster does not help if the products do not find users. The prediction market and Coinbase One traction suggests at least some of the new products are finding demand. But the consumer trading segment, which still generates more revenue than any other single line, continues to shrink.
What to watch
- Q3 trading volumes and the ETF stabilization signal. Coinbase noted that Bitcoin ETF outflows, which hurt custody revenue in Q2, had already stabilized entering Q3. Positive custody inflows excluding ETFs continued. The question is whether spot volumes recover alongside stabilized custody.
- Prediction markets regulatory landscape. With Kalshi facing lawsuits in multiple states, Coinbase’s regulated prediction market offering could capture displaced volume. Watch for quarterly prediction market revenue to exceed $30 million, which would put it on track for a $120 million annualized rate.
- USDC market share trajectory. USDC’s rise from roughly one fifth to more than one quarter of the stablecoin market directly drives Coinbase’s highest margin revenue. If Base chain continues gaining stablecoin volume at the current 7x year over year rate, this line item could offset trading fee declines.
- The stock’s valuation versus fundamentals. At a forward price to earnings ratio of 117.65 and a beta of 3.35, Coinbase trades as a high volatility growth stock. The analyst consensus target of $214.94 implies roughly 32% upside from current levels. If the Everything Exchange thesis holds, the current price reflects the market’s skepticism about execution.
- Revenue growth deceleration. Analysts project only 5.1% revenue growth over the next 12 months, a sharp deceleration from the 15.4% annualized rate of the prior two years. Whether Coinbase can beat this projection will determine whether the stock recovers or continues trading at depressed multiples.
Frequently asked questions
How much revenue did Coinbase report in Q2 2026?
Coinbase reported total revenue of $1.22 billion, missing the consensus estimate of $1.30 billion by approximately $80 million. Revenue declined 18.5% year over year from roughly $1.50 billion in Q2 2025.
What was Coinbase’s earnings per share in Q2?
Coinbase reported GAAP earnings per share of negative $1.36, far below consensus estimates that ranged from negative $0.01 to positive $0.14. The total GAAP net loss was $359.5 million.
What is Coinbase’s crypto trading volume market share?
Coinbase achieved an all time high crypto trading volume market share of 10.3% in Q2 2026, up from 9.1% in Q1. This was the third consecutive quarter of record market share gains.
How much revenue do prediction markets generate for Coinbase?
Prediction markets revenue grew 106% quarter over quarter in Q2, crossing $100 million in annualized run rate. The newer crypto binaries product generated three times the daily traders compared to its May average.
How much USDC does Coinbase hold?
Average USDC held on the Coinbase platform reached an all time high of $20 billion in Q2, representing more than 30% of all USDC in circulation. Coinbase captures approximately 50% of all USDC economics.
Why did Coinbase replace its earnings call with an X AMA?
Coinbase became the first major public company to replace a traditional quarterly earnings call with a live AMA on X. The format shift signals a strategic pivot toward retail and crypto native audiences rather than the institutional analyst community.
Is Coinbase still profitable on an adjusted basis?
Yes. Despite the GAAP net loss, Coinbase maintained its 14th consecutive quarter of positive adjusted EBITDA at $207.8 million. Free cash flow was $197.3 million at a 16.2% margin. Cash and equivalents stood at $8.6 billion.
What is the analyst price target for Coinbase stock?
The analyst consensus price target is $214.94, implying approximately 32% upside from the post earnings trading price of roughly $163. The stock trades at a forward price to earnings ratio of 117.65 with a beta of 3.35.
Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial or investment advice. The information presented reflects publicly available data as of July 31, 2026. Readers should conduct their own research and consult qualified financial advisors before making investment decisions.
Crypto World
Top investment ideas as interest rate uncertainty grips market

Bond market investors may want to shift their focus toward the front of the yield curve, according to Allspring Global Investments’ Noah Wise.
The bottom line: Focus exposure on short-term Treasurys over long duration.
Wise, the firm’s head of global macro strategy and a senior portfolio manager, sees the strategy as part of a diversified portfolio to deliver profits due to the monetary policy backdrop.
“You see a market that’s pricing in a couple of hikes for the Fed here over the next couple of years,” he told CNBC’s “ETF Edge” this week ahead of Wednesday’s Fed decision on interest rates. “That type of yield north of 4% with relatively low risk is, in our view, pretty attractive.”
Allspring primarily focuses on fixed income, money markets and stocks. According to the firm’s website, clients range from consultants and financial advisors to corporations and financial institutions.
Wise also sees opportunity in the U.S. credit market, citing strong macro fundamentals.
“We like [U.S.] credit, whether that’s investment grade or high yield, more than we like European credit at this time,” he said.
But credit is not the only avenue to diversification. Wise is also seeing opportunities in emerging markets, and he’s heading south.
“Particularly in Latin America, you can find yields that are at [double digits] so there’s a lot of opportunities,” he said. “I think even with the challenges and risks that we see geopolitically, you can still generate pretty attractive yield and income in a really diversified manner.”
In a special note to CNBC, Wise wrote that this week’s Fed decision to leave rates unchanged has not changed his investment strategy.
“Opportunity always lurks where uncertainty is found. The market [moving] in short-term Treasury yields between these two Fed meetings is a good example of this, and our strategies have been tactically adjusting our exposure to this part of the curve in an effort to take advantage of that volatility,” he wrote.
Crypto World
Bitcoin Slumps into July Close as Analysts Warn of Bear-Market Repeat
Bitcoin (BTC) fell to its lowest levels in over two weeks on Friday as US stocks saw pressure into the monthly close.
Key points:
- Bitcoin approaches $62,000 as daily losses hit 3.5%.
- US stocks saw no positive reactions to relief in Asia, where stocks rebounded after the semiconductor sell-off.
- Analysis warns that Bitcoin bear-market history should continue to repeat in August.
Bitcoin price targets $62,000 in month-end volatility
Data from TradingView showed BTC/USD falling 3.5% to reach $62,369 on Bitstamp, a level last seen on July 14.

BTC/USD one-hour chart. Source: Cointelegraph/TradingView
US stocks turned red at the open before treading water, diverging from a major relief bounce seen in Asia. There, South Korea’s KOSPI index ended the day up 17.9%, its largest single-day gain on record.

KOSPI index one-day chart. Source: Cointelegraph/TradingView
“Semiconductor shares led both the sell-off and the subsequent recovery, reflecting the index’s high exposure to the global AI and memory-chip cycle,” trading company QCP Capital wrote in commentary on the latest macro market moves.
QCP noted that crypto market trading activity increased around the KOSPI gyrations, something it said “highlighted the growing relationship between crypto liquidity, regional equity positioning and broader technology-sector sentiment.”
Both Japan and Korea reportedly engaged in currency interventions on Thursday, while Japan’s central bank kept benchmark interest rates at 1.0%, following the US Federal Reserve’s decision to stand pat on Wednesday.
Bitcoin traders see bear-market history repeating in August
BTC/USD approached the end of the monthly candle up 8.5%, marking its strongest July performance since 2022, per data from CoinGlass.

BTC/USD monthly returns (screenshot). Source: CoinGlass
Related: Here’s what happened in crypto today
Previously, traders had anticipated a relief bounce for the pair lasting until August, mirroring the 2022 bear market and ultimately reaching its next long-term bottom.
Trader and analyst Rekt Capital, among those seeing BTC price action copying bear-market moves from four years ago, forecast that the tide might not turn immediately.
“It’s likely price will try to maintain these highs in the early stages of August but history suggests price could rollover just like it did in 2022,” he wrote in a post on X on Friday.
Rekt Capital reiterated that Bitcoin’s 50-month exponential moving average (EMA), currently at $65,820, continued to act as resistance after two failed breakouts since mid-June.

BTC/USD one-day chart with 50-month EMA. Source: Cointelegraph/TradingView
Crypto World
Bitcoin braces for August slump as AI stocks falter
Bitcoin price fell below $63,000 on Friday as a short-lived rebound in Asian semiconductor stocks faded, adding pressure as the cryptocurrency entered its historically weak August trading period.
Summary
- Bitcoin price dropped 3% in 24 hours, extending its weekly loss to about 2%.
- Samsung and SK Hynix surrendered momentum after surging roughly 25% on Thursday.
- Bitcoin’s median August return stands near negative 8%, placing $58,000 in focus.
- The Crypto Fear & Greed Index fell to 25, signaling “Extreme Fear.”
Bitcoin price falls below $63K as risk assets weaken
Bitcoin traded below $63,000 after losing approximately 3% over the previous 24 hours. The decline followed renewed weakness in Asian technology shares, particularly companies tied to the artificial intelligence and semiconductor sectors.
Ethereum fell 2.8% to around $1,860, while Solana declined 2% to approximately $73. XRP traded near $1.06 as selling spread across large-cap cryptocurrencies.
The pullback came one day after Samsung Electronics and SK Hynix rallied roughly 25%, helping South Korea’s KOSPI recover from a steep multiweek decline. That rebound initially suggested investors were returning to semiconductor stocks following heavy selling.
Momentum failed to carry into Friday, however, raising concerns that Thursday’s advance was a temporary relief rally rather than the start of a sustained recovery.
Why faltering AI stocks are weighing on crypto
Crypto assets and AI-related equities have increasingly traded as part of the same risk-sensitive market. Both sectors rely heavily on speculative capital and tend to weaken when investors reduce exposure to high-valuation assets.
Recent pressure on semiconductor stocks has centered on questions about whether AI infrastructure spending can continue at its current pace. Investors are also examining whether future demand for memory chips and computing hardware can support valuations reached during the AI investment boom.
Those concerns are not directly related to Bitcoin’s network or adoption. However, broad risk reduction can still affect crypto as institutional traders rebalance portfolios, reduce leverage and move funds into cash or defensive assets.
For US investors, the next moves in Nvidia and other AI-linked shares could provide an important signal for crypto sentiment. Continued losses across the Nasdaq and semiconductor sector may limit Bitcoin’s ability to recover even without a crypto-specific negative catalyst.
Extreme fear compounds Bitcoin’s August risk
Market sentiment has deteriorated alongside prices. Alternative’s Crypto Fear & Greed Index stood at 25, placing the market in the “Extreme Fear” category. The index was at 28 one week earlier.
CoinGecko category data also showed limited strength across the crypto market. Decentralized finance showed limited relative resilience, but the sector remained under pressure alongside the broader crypto market.
That flat performance suggests investors may be favoring yield-generating or market-neutral DeFi strategies over directional exposure. It does not necessarily indicate that traders expect an immediate market recovery.
Bitcoin’s entry into August adds another risk. Historical data over the past 4 years places its average return for the month near negative 10%, making August one of the cryptocurrency’s weakest calendar periods.
Thin summer liquidity can magnify price swings as participation falls. Traders may also reduce exposure ahead of a month associated with repeated losses, creating additional selling pressure through a self-reinforcing seasonal pattern.
Bitcoin price could test $58K if weakness persists
An 8% decline from Bitcoin’s current level near $63,000 would place the asset around $58,000. That area is likely to attract attention as a possible support zone if selling continues.
A break below $58,000 could expose Bitcoin to a deeper correction, particularly if weak liquidity combines with leveraged long liquidations. Conversely, a recovery above $63,000 would be an early sign that buyers are absorbing supply.
The more important test may come from outside the crypto market. A sustainable floor in AI and semiconductor shares could help restore broader risk appetite, while another sharp decline would increase the likelihood of further pressure on Bitcoin.
Extreme fear has historically appeared near favorable medium-term entry points, but it does not identify an exact market bottom. Bitcoin’s August seasonality, weak technology shares and cautious investor positioning leave the near-term setup tilted toward volatility.
Crypto World
The Strait of Hormuz Is Exposing a Blind Spot in the Energy Transition
But, with higher fuel prices eating into airline profits, companies are now poorly positioned to take advantage of the moment. To facilitate SAF production, airlines typically agree to long-term agreements to purchase the fuel. With high levels of geopolitical uncertainty, this is not the moment for executives to commit to a price premium without a regulatory mandate. SAF may sound nice, but it remains unaffordable.
The refiners who make SAF, on the other hand, are enjoying record profit margins. But they, too, see too much uncertainty as prices fluctuate wildly. On earnings calls this summer they say they are more focused on improving operations and executing existing plans than investing in new projects.
At a national level, the thinking should be different. SAF is more expensive, but a government can now clearly see the differential as an energy security premium as well as a sustainability advantage. It’s well worth paying to protect the country’s economy in the event of a Hormuz-like situation.
Crypto World
Tether Q2 profit hits $1.5B as USDT supply grows
Tether generated approximately $1.5 billion in net operating profit during the second quarter of 2026 as returns from US Treasury holdings and repo operations supported its earnings.
Summary
- Tether recorded about $1.5 billion in quarterly operating profit, according to its BDO attestation.
- USDT supply reached approximately $184.6 billion, representing over 60% of the stablecoin market.
- The company reported $187.7 billion in assets and about $4.1 billion in excess reserves.
- Tether reduced secured loans by $2.4 billion while adding 14 tons to its gold holdings.
Tether reports $4.1B in excess reserves
Tether’s total assets stood at approximately $187.7 billion at the end of June, while its reported liabilities totaled $183.6 billion. The difference left the stablecoin issuer with roughly $4.1 billion in excess reserves.
The figures appeared in Tether’s latest reserve attestation, prepared by accounting firm BDO and released Friday. US government-backed securities continued to account for the largest portion of the company’s reserve portfolio.
Interest earned from that portfolio, along with returns from repo operations, provided the main source of Tether’s second-quarter profit. The company’s exposure to short-term US debt has made its earnings sensitive to Federal Reserve policy and changes in Treasury yields.
Tether also reported that the circulating supply of USDT reached approximately $184.6 billion by the end of June. Based on the company’s figures, the token controlled more than 60% of the global stablecoin market.
Gold holdings rise as secured lending declines
Tether adjusted the composition of its reserves during the quarter by reducing secured lending and increasing its holdings of physical gold.
Outstanding secured loans fell by about $2.4 billion. Tether did not provide a full breakdown of the borrowers or collateral involved in the lending reduction in the information accompanying the results.
Meanwhile, the company purchased another 14 tons of physical gold, bringing its total holdings to more than 146 tons. The increase continued Tether’s move beyond cash-equivalent reserves and into assets such as gold and Bitcoin.
Tether said its portfolio remained resilient despite sharp price swings affecting both assets during the quarter. Its Bitcoin holdings were valued at approximately $5.8 billion at the end of June.
Those positions may provide additional returns when prices rise, but they also expose part of Tether’s balance sheet to greater market volatility than short-dated US government debt.
US Treasury holdings keep Tether tied to US markets
Tether’s reserve structure gives the company a substantial connection to US financial markets even though USDT operates globally.
The company’s earnings remain heavily influenced by income from US Treasury securities and related repo transactions. Any change in US interest rates could therefore affect future profitability, even if the number of USDT tokens in circulation continues to grow.
Tether is also expanding a separate US-focused stablecoin, USAT. The token recently launched on Celo, its second supported mainnet following Ethereum.
USAT users can mint and redeem the token natively on Celo without relying on third-party bridges. Celo’s CIP-64 upgrade also allows approved ERC-20 tokens to pay network transaction fees, meaning users can use USAT for gas instead of holding a separate token.
The deployment extends Tether’s US-oriented product to a blockchain commonly used for digital-dollar payments. It also separates USAT’s expansion from the company’s larger offshore USDT business.
Tether expands infrastructure beyond stablecoins
Tether said it added more than 30 million users globally during the second quarter while continuing preparations for a full audit by a Big Four accounting firm. It did not provide a completion date for that process.
The company is also exploring tokenized capital-market infrastructure in Africa. Tether and the Nairobi Securities Exchange signed a memorandum of understanding on July 28 covering tokenized securities, blockchain-based market systems and digital asset education in Kenya.
The parties will assess whether USDT could support settlement infrastructure where Kenyan regulations allow. However, the memorandum does not authorize a tokenized security, launch a trading venue or commit the exchange to using USDT.
No pilot date, budget, or binding implementation schedule was disclosed. Future developments will depend on regulatory approval, technical assessments, and whether the exploratory agreement advances into a formal project.
Crypto World
3 Fed Officials Just Explained Their Rate Hike Vote: Is Inflation Winning?
Three Fed officials voted for a rate hike on Wednesday. On Friday, they finally said why.
Their answers do not match. Each one wants higher rates for a different reason. That gap is the real story.
Why the Fed Rate Hike Vote Split 9 to 3
The Fed left rates alone on Wednesday. The target range stayed at 3.50% to 3.75%.
Three people on the committee said no. Lorie Logan of Dallas, Neel Kashkari of Minneapolis and Beth Hammack of Cleveland all wanted a quarter point rise. That made it a 9 to 3 split vote.
The vote was public straight away. The thinking behind it was not.
Chair Kevin Warsh told reporters to play the ball, not the referee. He listed what the committee had argued about. He never explained why the majority chose to hold.
The three who lost the vote have now said more than the nine who won it.
Follow us on X to get the latest news as it happens
Bond traders had already picked a side. The 30-year Treasury yield closed at its highest level since 2007 on Thursday.
Logan Says Inflation Is Stuck Near 2.5%
Logan’s case is simple. Prices have risen too fast for more than five years. Inflation is not on track to reach 2%.
Strip out one-off supply shocks and better productivity, she says, and inflation still lands in the mid-2s. The risk is that it drifts higher, not lower.
She also thinks today’s rates are not slowing anything down. Jobs look solid. So does spending.
“Without any policy restraint, inflation will likely continue to trend above target until there’s an unanticipated shock. The FOMC cannot count on unanticipated shocks to achieve its goals and can always adjust policy if unanticipated shocks occur,” Logan, statement.
Her fix is small and early. A quarter point now beats a bigger move later.
Same Vote, 3 Different Reasons
Kashkari is not making Logan’s argument. Instead, BeInCrypto reads him as a risk manager. He wants tighter policy because the outlook is so uncertain, not because inflation is proven to be stuck.
Hammack is the third vote. Her own reasoning had not been published at the time of writing.
Here is why that matters. One shared argument is easy to answer. Three separate arguments are much harder. It looks like the Fed family feud Warsh once said he wanted.
Crypto has already turned. Bitcoin (BTC) rose after Wednesday’s hold. It has since dropped back, trading near $62,600 on Friday, down 3.2% in a day.
September brings the next meeting. If oil climbs again, the three may not need to win the argument. They may just need one more vote.
The post 3 Fed Officials Just Explained Their Rate Hike Vote: Is Inflation Winning? appeared first on BeInCrypto.
Crypto World
Consensus Is the Last Middleman: The Case for Quantum Money
Quantum computers could one day break Bitcoin (BTC), yet the same physics could also build money that is impossible to forge. Two experts argue that quantum money, not the blockchain, may be the final form of digital cash.
Stefano Gogioso and Daniela Herrmann made the argument during the latest BeInCrypto Experts Council. Their case rests on an idea older than crypto itself, and on a single law of physics.
Money Has Always Been a Story About Trust
A companion analysis asked when quantum computers might break Bitcoin. This piece asks the opposite question. What if the same technology builds something better than the money we use today?
The answer begins with a line from Gogioso that reframes the debate. Consensus, he says, is “the last middleman.”
To see why, it helps to trace how money lost its trust in the first place.
Physical cash needs no middleman. A gold coin proves itself, and a buyer does not have to trust a bank, a ledger, or a network to accept it. Cash, however, cannot travel down a wire.
Digital money solved distance, but it brought the middlemen back. Every online payment now trusts an intermediary to confirm that the same unit is not spent twice.
Bitcoin answered that problem by replacing institutions with math and consensus. Thousands of computers agree on one shared history, so no central party is needed.
The idea of using physics instead of trust, however, is older than Bitcoin. It is older than the modern internet.
In the late 1960s, a Columbia University graduate student named Stephen Wiesner wrote a manuscript called “Conjugate Coding.” Journals rejected it, and it stayed unpublished until 1983.
Wiesner proposed money that could not be counterfeited, protected by physics rather than by a bank. It was the first real use anyone had imagined for quantum information.
That work later inspired the 1984 protocol known as BB84, which launched quantum cryptography. In effect, the whole field grew out of an attempt to make unforgeable money.
Security From Physics, Not Secrecy
Classical cryptography rests on hard math problems. A code stays safe because solving it would take too long. Quantum cryptography works on a different footing.
Its guarantee comes from a physical law called the no-cloning theorem. Physicists William Wootters and Wojciech Zurek proved it in 1982. An unknown quantum state cannot be perfectly copied.
The mechanism is elegant. Any attempt to copy the state disturbs it. The forgery fails, and the tampering shows.
Gogioso has spent years turning that law into working tools. At an earlier BeInCrypto interview in Naples, he described keys that defend themselves. If someone intercepts a quantum key, it is destroyed in transit, and the receiver sees the protocol break.
On the Council panel, he pushed the idea to its limit.
“You can build applications that do not need to trust the very hardware they run on. You can literally commission the hardware from your attacker, and as long as the application passes its self-testing, you are guaranteed security. Worst case, it simply refuses to run. And this is provably impossible classically.”
Specialists call this device-independent cryptography. The security holds even if the manufacturer is hostile. That property matters because complex hardware is exactly where backdoors tend to hide.
Why Unforgeable Keys Become Money
The step from security to money is short. Cheating and forgery are the same problem in different words.
If you cannot copy a quantum state, you cannot counterfeit it. And a thing that cannot be counterfeited can serve as money.
Gogioso drew the line directly.
“A different way of saying you cannot cheat is saying you cannot copy or forge. From the very same family of techniques, you get quantum money, or quantum financial instruments. New ways of doing digital finance with far fewer trust assumptions on intermediaries, networks, and counterparties.”
His team has already built the smallest version of the concept. In Naples, he demonstrated keys that work only once. To spend one, you have to destroy it, which stops an attacker from replaying an old payment.
A single-use key is a tiny piece of unforgeable value. Scale that principle up, and you reach what researchers call quantum money.
The theory is not new. In 2012, Scott Aaronson and Paul Christiano proposed the first public-key quantum money scheme. It lets anyone verify a note, not only the bank that issued it. Their framing echoed Wiesner almost exactly, describing money that cannot be counterfeited according to the laws of physics.
Quantum Money and the Last Middleman
Now the pieces meet. Bitcoin removed the banks, but it did not remove trust. It shifted that trust onto a network and a shared ledger. Something still has to agree on which payments are real.
Gogioso views that agreement as the final intermediary. Web3 and zero-knowledge tools clawed back some of the trust that digital money gave away, he says, yet consensus still does the last job of preventing forgery.
That job carries a cost. Consensus demands coordination, energy, and a crowd of participants who must broadly agree. A physical guarantee needs none of those things.
Quantum money, in his telling, removes the middleman completely.
“Quantum money is the next and final evolution of that story. You recover something digital that you can transact at a distance, but without trusting intermediaries, global ledgers, or someone deciding which transactions go into an Ethereum (ETH) block. The physics gives you the unforgeability directly. In that sense, consensus is truly the last middleman.”
The claim is large, so it is worth stating plainly. If it holds, quantum money would be to Bitcoin what Bitcoin was to the bank.
There is a symmetry worth noting. The physics that threatens Bitcoin’s signatures is the same physics that could retire the need for consensus altogether.
The One Defense That Survives Smarter Attackers
There is a further reason the timing matters. Artificial intelligence is getting better at breaking things.
Most security today assumes the attacker is not clever enough, or that a problem is simply too hard to solve in time. Gogioso argues that this assumption looks fragile in an age of capable AI.
Physics offers a different kind of promise.
“What quantum really buys you is security based on the laws of the universe. It doesn’t matter how smart the AI is. You can’t break it. Worst case, you can stop it from happening, but you cannot forge it.”
That is the deeper appeal of the approach. A quantum guarantee does not depend on the attacker’s limits. It depends on the structure of reality, which no amount of intelligence can rewrite.
Quantum Money: Not Here Yet, but Within Reach
Both guests were careful not to oversell the idea. Herrmann, whose firm builds commercial quantum tools, marked the boundary clearly.
“Quantum money is the vision, once this all plays out. Right now, quantum money as such isn’t available yet. But as soon as the chips advance, these things have to be handled with real responsibility.”
The main obstacle is quantum memory. Holding a fragile quantum state is difficult, and today the best systems keep one for only seconds. Gogioso has said that the limit still puts full quantum money out of reach, though the same hardware already suits short-lived tasks.
Even so, the direction is set. Laboratory experiments have begun to demonstrate quantum tokens and related schemes, moving the idea off the page.
Gogioso closed the panel on that note.
“Within five, six, seven years we could live in a world where we use quantum resources to do things that are provably impossible today. Not just hard, not just slow, actually impossible. And this is software we can start building today, not in five years. The future is absolutely within reach.”
More than half a century after Wiesner sketched money that physics itself would guard, the idea is finally leaving the whiteboard. If Gogioso and Herrmann are right, the last middleman may not survive the decade.
The post Consensus Is the Last Middleman: The Case for Quantum Money appeared first on BeInCrypto.
Crypto World
America’s Best Private Companies of 2026
Now, younger generations entering the workforce are less drawn to big companies than the generations prior. They factor in wellness outside of work in addition to salary. “They really care about their family, life issues; whether their work will be valuable to their own life. In that sense private companies might be a better place because they can design their own purpose,” Lee says. In this trend, they may also be interested in alternative organization structures like employee-owned companies or worker cooperatives, which have been growing in popularity, with the federal government even encouraging more employers to adopt such models. Southern staple Publix (no. 9) and warehouse chain WinCo (no. 10) are both employee-owned through an Employee Stock Ownership Plan (ESOP).
“Usually, employee-owned companies have higher productivity, their revenue growth is usually 3-4% higher than other companies, and then their quit rate is about a third of other companies,” Lee says. “These numbers always show that employees are very actively engaged in their own company, because their perspective is more long term. … These are motivational incentives for employee owners to make their companies better, and perform better, and that could impact their retirement.” On the other hand, worker cooperatives benefit from “a lot of diverse opinions and comments and insight that really makes their corporate strategy different than other competitors,” Lee says.
Crypto World
Bitcoin (BTC) price’s July gain survives hawkish Fed, AI meltdown and Coldcard fallout
Since then, average daily liquidations have remained well below this year’s typical $400 million-$500 million range, suggesting there has been little forced selling despite the macro shock, according to Bitfinex.
“Crypto fell less than levered equity themes because the forced-selling fuel was already spent,” the analysts wrote.
Security concerns linger
Separately, the market is also digesting the fallout from a major exploit involving Coldcard, which resulted in at least $38 million worth of bitcoin being stolen.
The incident hasn’t materially affected price action, but it marked another blowback as digital asset-related exploits have surged and reignited debate around risks of self-custody, one of crypto’s fundamental promises.
“The proceeds haven’t yet been liquidated, but the knock-on effect of this and the likelihood of liquidation will weigh on bitcoin pricing in the near term,” said Paul Howard, director at trading firm Wincent. More broadly, he said, the exploit highlights the operational risks that continue to accompany self-custody.
Read more: Coldcard’s $38 million (so far) exploit shakes faith in self-custody, may push investors to ETFs
Eyes on jobs data and ETF flows
Looking ahead, macro uncertainty remains the dominant theme.
Jeff Anderson, managing partner at STS Digital, said markets may be entering “a new volatility regime” as investors swing between expectations for rate cuts, pauses and hikes. That uncertainty, he said, is likely to keep pressure on high-beta assets such as bitcoin until the economic outlook becomes clearer.
Crypto World
Grayscale joins push for CLARITY Act Senate vote as deadline nears
Grayscale Investments has urged the Senate to vote on the CLARITY Act before the August recess as lawmakers face mounting pressure to resolve disputes holding up the crypto market structure bill.
Summary
- Grayscale requested a Senate floor vote on the CLARITY Act before lawmakers leave Washington.
- The bill would divide digital asset oversight between the SEC and CFTC.
- Ethics restrictions involving federal officials remain a sticking point in bipartisan negotiations.
- Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent has also called for an immediate vote.
Grayscale urges action on the CLARITY Act
Grayscale sent a letter to senators calling for action on the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act, or H.R. 3633. The asset manager said hundreds of thousands of Americans hold its digital asset investment products, giving the company and its clients a direct interest in clearer federal rules.
The bill seeks to establish a regulatory framework for digital asset markets and clarify the respective responsibilities of the Securities and Exchange Commission and Commodity Futures Trading Commission.
“Senators and staff across the aisle have spent months addressing hard questions about jurisdiction, investor protections, and developer safeguards,” Grayscale said.
According to the company, the proposed framework would strengthen investor protections while preventing legitimate blockchain developers from facing rules intended for financial intermediaries.
Grayscale argued that crypto businesses, developers and investors need stable rules instead of relying on enforcement actions and agency guidance that can change between administrations.
The company also linked the legislation to regulated crypto investment products. Clearer asset classifications and trading rules could affect the development of exchange-traded funds, exchange-traded products and other vehicles available to U.S. investors.
Senate negotiations face a shrinking deadline
Senators have limited floor time remaining before the August recess, with nominations, government funding discussions and foreign policy measures competing for attention.
Sen. Cynthia Lummis said Senate leaders were still trying to bring the legislation forward before the break. She noted that lawmakers had “one more week here in Washington,” although she acknowledged the crowded schedule.
The House passed its version of the CLARITY Act by a 294–134 vote in July 2025, with 78 Democrats supporting the legislation. Any changes adopted by the Senate would need approval from both chambers before the bill could reach President Donald Trump’s desk.
Senate negotiations have continued over ethics provisions covering digital asset activities involving federal officials. That dispute has complicated efforts to secure enough Democratic support to overcome the chamber’s 60-vote threshold for advancing most legislation.
Republicans hold 53 Senate seats, meaning the bill would likely need support from at least seven Democrats if every Republican voted in favor. Lawmakers have also considered a procedural vote that could establish the timing and rules for further debate.
Bessent adds pressure for an immediate vote
Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent has joined the campaign for Senate action, calling on lawmakers to vote “NOW” on the CLARITY Act.
Bessent accused Senate Democrats of delaying the measure under pressure from Sen. Elizabeth Warren and other crypto critics. His intervention added support from the Trump administration as negotiators worked to resolve the remaining disagreements.
Ethics enforcement has emerged as one of the main obstacles. A reported proposal from Republican Sen. Thom Tillis and Democratic Sen. Ruben Gallego would allow state authorities to enforce restrictions on federal officials issuing or sponsoring digital tokens.
The proposal would replace an earlier approach that gave the U.S. attorney general sole enforcement authority. Whether that compromise can attract enough bipartisan backing remains uncertain.
US competitiveness becomes part of the debate
Grayscale warned that prolonged uncertainty could push digital asset investment and technical talent toward jurisdictions with more predictable regulations. It cited Singapore and Abu Dhabi as markets that have established clearer frameworks for crypto businesses.
The argument reflects a broader industry effort to frame market structure legislation as an issue of U.S. competitiveness. Supporters say federal rules would give companies more certainty when deciding where to develop products, raise capital and serve customers.
No clear cryptocurrency price movement has been directly linked to Grayscale’s letter. Traders remain focused on whether Senate leaders formally schedule a vote and whether negotiators reach an agreement on ethics restrictions.
Failure to act before the recess would push the debate further into the legislative calendar, where other spending and policy deadlines could make floor time harder to secure. A scheduled vote would signal that Senate leaders believe the bill has enough support to move forward.
-
Sports5 days agoCommonwealth Games boxing: Jadumani Singh seals dominant 5-0 win over Pakistan’s Sumama Rehman to enter quarter-finals | Commonwealth Games News
-
Business2 days agoWhy Trees Belong on the Risk Register
-
Tech5 days agoIntel is reversing course and bringing hyper-threading back to its server chips
-
Fashion4 hours agoWeekend Open Thread: Wit & Wisdom
-
Crypto World6 days agoRipple bought a bank in pieces. The $4 billion audit
-
Politics4 days agoLuke Littler dismantles Gerwyn Price to retain title in Blackpool
-
Politics4 days agoThe Part of the Electric Transition Nobody Wants to Discuss
-
News Videos5 days agoBITCOIN JUST ENTERED THIS CRITICAL ZONE…
-
Entertainment3 days ago‘Stargate’ Creator’s New Sci-Fi Series Returns for Season 3 Tomorrow
-
Crypto World6 days agoXRP Ledger adds $2.6B as RWA inflows rank second
-
Business3 days agoMajor shareholder moves on Canyon
-
News Videos1 day agoBitcoin Enters the 3rd Stage of the Bear Market
-
Politics5 days agoSpain sweeps the board at 2026 World Cup with individual awards
-
Entertainment6 days agoSara Gilson Killed By Husband After Viral “Pedophile” TikTok Video
-
Crypto World3 days agoKraken Enables Retail Access to Jersey Mike’s IPO via Tokenized Shares
-
Tech7 days agoAnthropic launches Claude Opus 5, a cheaper AI model for coding, agents and enterprise workflows
-
Tech4 days agoNew macOS Sequoia & Sonoma security updates for older Macs
-
News Videos3 days agoClaude: Build Financial Dashboards in Minutes (2026)
-
Politics1 day agoLuke Littler’s dominance sparks GOAT debate
-
Crypto World6 days agoUpbit expands KRW market with two major DeFi token listings

You must be logged in to post a comment Login