Connect with us

Crypto World

Crypto News, Prices & Indexes

Published

on

Crypto Breaking News

Bitcoin and Ethereum led a broad rally in risk assets as traders priced in cooling inflation and firmer macro signals, but the rebound for Ether came with a caveat: derivatives markets remained largely cautious. The on-chain picture shows a liquidity landscape that is still hunting for clear catalysts, even as Ether clears key price resistances. In short, a positive price move does not yet translate into a confident shift in momentum, with traders continuing to weigh the risk of another leg lower as macro headlines evolve.

Key takeaways

  • Ethereum maintains dominance in total value locked (TVL), but scrutiny of layer-2 scaling and its subsidy model persists as investors assess long-term efficiency.
  • Ether’s inflation metric rose to ~0.8% over the last 30 days as on-chain activity cooled, while macro concerns kept derivatives in a cautious, risk-off stance.
  • ETH 2‑month futures traded at roughly a 3% premium to spot, below the 5% neutral threshold, signaling tepid optimism from Ether traders despite the rally.
  • Year-to-date, Ether has underperformed the broader crypto market by about 9%, raising questions about where capital is flowing and how much is staying tethered to Ethereum’s core ecosystem.
  • Deposits on the Ethereum base layer account for roughly 58% of the entire blockchain industry; including Base, Arbitrum, and Optimism, that figure rises to about 65%. The largest DApp on the Ethereum base layer holds more than $23 billion in TVL, underscoring Ethereum’s ongoing scale advantage over competitors like Solana, where the top DApp’s TVL remains far smaller.

Tickers mentioned: $BTC, $ETH

Sentiment: Bearish

Price impact: Positive. Ether reclaimed the $2,100 level as the broader market rose, but the bounce remains tentative amid persistent risk-off signals in the derivatives space.

Trading idea (Not Financial Advice): Hold. The current price recovery lacks clear, durable conviction from buyers, and any sustained advance will depend on a shift in risk appetite and improved on-chain activity.

Advertisement

Market context: The price move comes within a broader environment of liquidity fluctuations and macro uncertainty, where flows into crypto often track traditional risk indicators and regulatory chatter as much as technical levels.

Why it matters

The Ethereum ecosystem remains the cornerstone of DeFi and NFT activity, with the base layer continuing to attract the majority of on-chain value. Even as the chain holds a commanding TVL lead, the narrative around layer-2 solutions—how they decentralize, secure, and scale applications—has grown more nuanced. Ethereum’s current stance reflects a tension between the heavy usage that has historically fueled its dynamics and the structural questions about how best to sustain growth without compromising security or centralizing risk through bridges or trusted constructs.

Data from ultrasound.money shows Ether’s supply growth accelerating to about 0.8% on an annualized basis over the last month, a sign that the burn dynamics intended to counter inflation are not as punitive as hoped when network demand softens. The built-in burn mechanism relies on base-layer data processing activity; when that activity wanes, the net effect can be a modest supply expansion, tempering the deflationary narrative some bulls have pushed. This dynamic aligns with the observed softness in on-chain activity and the tepid appetite in the derivatives market, where a 3% premium for 2‑month Ether futures sits below the 5% neutral threshold—an indication that traders are not aggressively pricing in rapid upside (Laevitas data: laevitas.ch).

On the fundamental side, the ladder of TVL metrics continues to illustrate Ethereum’s centrality. The Ethereum base layer alone accounts for the majority of blockchain deposits, while including the leading layer-2 ecosystems—Base, Arbitrum, and Optimism—pushes the share to well above two-thirds of industry activity. In contrast, Solana’s leading DApp sits far behind, a reminder that capital has not yet pursued a broad shift away from Ethereum despite competition. This shape of the market matters for developers evaluating where to build and for investors weighing the durability of Ethereum’s moat in a multi-chain era.

Advertisement

The pace of adoption in layer-2 networks is another focal point. Vitalik Buterin has argued that the L2 path to decentralization has proven more challenging than originally envisioned, given reliance on multisig-controlled bridges and security trade-offs. In interviews and analyses, he has signaled a pivot toward base-layer scalability while acknowledging that privacy-focused features and application-specific designs on L2s will continue to influence capital allocation patterns. The inherent tension between scalability and security is central to investors’ risk calculus as they parse long-term returns from layer-1 vs. layer-2 deployments. For context, related discussions emphasize the difference between “real DeFi” and centralized yield constructs, underscoring how policy choices and technology design shape the sustainable value proposition of Ethereum’s ecosystem (Vitalik Buterin commentary: Ethereum scaling pivot).

Another facet of the narrative is the relationship between price performance and liquidity provision. Ether’s price recovery has not yet translated into a broad-based rally in the derivatives market, where risk-off sentiment remains visible in pricing and open interest. While the disappearance of a rapid down-leg is a relief for holders, the absence of robust upside pressure suggests traders remain cautious, watching macro data and regulatory signals for any signs that capital will pivot back toward higher-yield opportunities. In this context, the chart of Ether against the overall crypto capitalization illustrates a persistent lag, with Ether’s performance this year lagging the broader market by roughly 9% as capital rotates among competing use cases and networks (TradingView: ETH/USD vs. total crypto capitalization).

Finally, the market’s attention remains split between long-term fundamental deployments and near-term price movements. The burn mechanism’s trajectory depends on on-chain activity, while the composition of TVL—especially the share captured by L2s—will influence how investors perceive Ethereum’s ability to sustain network effects. The ongoing debate about L2 security, decentralization, and throughput feeds into price dynamics and shapes the risk-reward calculus for traders and developers alike. As developers experiment with privacy-focused features and bespoke, application-specific layer designs, Ethereum’s scale narrative remains central to the crypto economy’s evolution, even as other chains strive to carve out niche advantages.

What to watch next

  • Monitor Ether’s price action around the $2,200 area and whether buying pressure gains enough momentum to sustain a breakout.
  • Track Vitalik Buterin’s public comments and any policy shifts from major layer-2 projects regarding decentralization and security architecture.
  • Observe on-chain activity metrics and the burn rate versus supply growth using ultrasound.money data to gauge deflationary pressure.
  • Watch DefiLlama for TVL movements between the Ethereum base layer and its Layer-2 ecosystem to assess flow shifts across the ecosystem.
  • Keep an eye on macro indicators and central bank signals that influence liquidity and risk sentiment, as these ultimately drive derivative pricing and capital allocation.

Sources & verification

  • ETH price levels and movement relative to the $2,150 threshold and recovery to $2,100+ zones.
  • 2-month Ether futures annualized premium data from Laevitas as a gauge of derivatives sentiment.
  • ETH supply growth metrics (0.8% annualized over the last 30 days) from ultrasound.money.
  • TVL breakdowns and main chain vs. Layer-2 deposits from DefiLlama data.
  • Official commentary by Vitalik Buterin on Layer-2 decentralization and the burn mechanism, including linked analyses.

What the numbers say about the market today

Market breadth has improved modestly as Ether reclaims price levels, yet the path to a sustainable rally remains uncertain. The interplay between layer-2 subsidies, base-layer scalability, and on-chain activity will continue to shape price dynamics and capital flows. Investors are watching for signals that derivatives markets finally align with price action, suggesting a broader willingness to take on risk. Until then, Ether’s leadership in TVL and ongoing L2 development will be essential barometers for the health and direction of the crypto ecosystem.

Risk & affiliate notice: Crypto assets are volatile and capital is at risk. This article may contain affiliate links. Read full disclosure

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Crypto World

Bitcoin, Ethereum, Crypto News & Price Indexes

Published

on

Bitcoin, Ethereum, Crypto News & Price Indexes

Jump Trading, a Chicago-based quantitative trading company, is reportedly set to acquire minority stakes in prediction market platforms Polymarket and Kalshi, underscoring growing institutional interest in the rapidly expanding sector.

The equity stakes would be obtained in exchange for providing trading liquidity on both platforms, Bloomberg reported Monday, citing people familiar with the discussions.

While the report did not disclose specific ownership percentages, Bloomberg said Jump’s stake in Polymarket would scale based on the liquidity the company ultimately provides.

Founded more than two decades ago, Jump Trading has long been a major player in proprietary financial trading and has expanded aggressively into digital assets. It has been active as both a market maker and venture investor in crypto, backing blockchain infrastructure projects and exchanges through its affiliated investment arms.

Advertisement

Polymarket and Kalshi are the two largest prediction market platforms, each commanding multibillion-dollar valuations following recent funding rounds.

As previously reported by Cointelegraph, Polymarket raised $2 billion from NYSE parent Intercontinental Exchange, valuing the company at $9 billion. In early December, Kalshi secured $1 billion in funding at an $11 billion valuation.

While both platforms allow users to trade on the outcomes of real-world events, they operate under different models. Polymarket is a decentralized platform built on the Polygon blockchain that enables onchain settlement of prediction contracts, whereas Kalshi operates as a centralized, federally regulated exchange in the United States.

Polymarket’s monthly volume has surged at the start of 2026. Source: Dune

Related: Trump Jr. joins Polymarket board as prediction market eyes US comeback

Prediction markets gain traction, but still face regulatory hurdles

Prediction markets gained mainstream attention after Polymarket’s event contracts accurately forecast the outcome of the 2024 US presidential election, highlighting the sector’s potential as a real-time information and risk-pricing tool. Industry analysts now estimate that prediction markets may generate trillions of dollars in annual trading volume by the end of the decade.

Advertisement

Eilers & Krejcik Gaming, a research and consulting company specializing in the global gambling and gaming industry, has identified sports-related contracts as a major driver of that growth. Speaking to CNBC in December, Eilers & Krejcik partner emeritus Chris Grove said sports betting could account for nearly half of the sector’s projected expansion.

Despite Polymarket’s early lead, Kalshi had largely caught up, with trading volumes at similar levels as of October. Source: Messari

Despite the growth potential, Grove cautioned that legal and regulatory challenges could slow adoption. 

Kalshi, which operates as a federally regulated prediction market, has received approval from the US Commodity Futures Trading Commission to run as a Designated Contract Market. However, the platform is facing pushback at the state level. Regulators in Nevada, Maryland, New Jersey and Ohio have challenged Kalshi’s offerings, triggering ongoing litigation and cease-and-desist actions.

Related: Polymarket wins regulatory approval to operate US trading platform