US and UK financial regulators have expanded talks on stablecoins, tokenization and digital asset oversight as Washington begins implementing the GENIUS Act.

US, UK regulators discuss stablecoin policy

Senior officials from HM Treasury and the US Treasury met in London for the 13th UK-US Financial Regulatory Working Group meeting, according to an Aug. 4 joint statement.

Representatives from the Bank of England, Financial Conduct Authority, Federal Reserve, Securities and Exchange Commission, Commodity Futures Trading Commission, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation and Office of the Comptroller of the Currency also attended.

Digital finance formed a central part of the July 8 meeting. US officials updated their UK counterparts on the implementation of the GENIUS Act, which establishes a federal framework for payment stablecoins, and on continuing work to define the country’s broader digital asset market structure.

Officials also discussed tokenization, payment modernization and the G20 Cross-border Payments Roadmap. UK representatives provided an update on the country’s Wholesale Financial Markets Digital Strategy and the appointment of Christopher Woolard as Wholesale Digital Markets Champion.

The meeting did not produce new regulations or binding agreements. However, both sides reaffirmed support for the “responsible use and growth of digital assets” alongside consumer protection and financial stability, according to the official working group statement.

GENIUS Act raises pressure on UK stablecoin rules

The talks come as the United States moves from stablecoin legislation toward implementation, giving issuers and financial institutions a clearer route to operate under federal rules.

The UK is still completing its own framework. The FCA is expected to oversee the issuance, custody and trading of qualifying UK stablecoins, while the Bank of England will jointly regulate stablecoins considered systemically important.

Coordination could become important for US stablecoin issuers seeking access to UK payment and capital markets. Differences in reserve requirements, custody rules and insolvency protections could otherwise force issuers to maintain separate structures in each country.

The two governments addressed that risk in a separate July 14 statement from the Transatlantic Taskforce for Markets of the Future. They said their goal was to promote convergence where appropriate without replacing either country’s domestic regulatory process.

“Stablecoins held out as money should be fully backed,” the governments said.

The joint stablecoin statement called for at least one-to-one backing with high-quality liquid assets, segregated reserves and timely redemption. It also proposed exploring a pathway for stablecoins issued in one jurisdiction to enter the other market.

Bank of England softens earlier restrictions

The Bank of England has already revised some of its more restrictive stablecoin proposals following industry feedback.

In June, the central bank abandoned proposed per-coin holding limits of £20,000 for individuals and £10 million for businesses. It replaced them with a temporary £40 billion issuance guardrail for each systemic stablecoin, allowing users to transact without individual limits.

The Bank also reduced the share of reserves that systemic issuers must hold as non-interest-bearing central bank deposits from 40% to 30%. The remaining 70% may be held in short-term UK government debt under the steady-state framework.

These changes bring the UK closer to the shared US-UK position that reserve rules should protect holders without creating barriers that make stablecoin businesses commercially unworkable. The Bank of England plans to finalize its systemic stablecoin code by the end of 2026.

What comes next for transatlantic stablecoins

The next phase will depend on how US agencies implement the GENIUS Act and whether the two countries convert their shared principles into formal market-access arrangements.

Key unresolved issues include the treatment of foreign-issued stablecoins, regulatory recognition between jurisdictions, reserve custody and procedures for cross-border issuer failures.

The Financial Regulatory Working Group plans to meet again in early 2027. Until then, the July recommendations provide a policy direction rather than a unified transatlantic regime, leaving issuers subject to separate US and UK requirements.

Senate negotiations over digital asset legislation remain unresolved as lawmakers prepare for a key procedural vote. The CLARITY Act faces growing uncertainty after Democratic senators signaled they would not support ending debate without further concessions. Republican leaders continue seeking enough backing before lawmakers leave Washington for the summer recess.

Democrats Signal Resistance Before Procedural Vote

Democratic senators continue coordinating their position before the expected procedural vote on the CLARITY Act. Several lawmakers insist unresolved issues require additional bipartisan negotiations before supporting cloture. Senate leaders have not announced any agreement addressing those concerns.

Punchbowl News reporter Brendan Pedersen described the current Democratic position in a post on X. He wrote, “There is a clear consensus among Senate Democrats right now that—without movement on ethics, illicit finance and stablecoin yield—a cloture vote this week on the Clarity Act will fail.” His comments reflected the latest state of negotiations before the expected vote.

Pedersen also wrote, “Democrats won’t be moved by crypto cash at this point.” That statement highlights continuing resistance despite Republican efforts to secure procedural support. The CLARITY Act therefore remains short of the bipartisan momentum needed for a successful cloture vote.

Outstanding Issues Continue to Divide Both Parties

Senate Majority Leader John Thune continues working toward a procedural vote before lawmakers begin the August recess. However, several Democratic senators argue the CLARITY Act still requires further revisions before advancing. Negotiators continue discussing ethics provisions, illicit finance safeguards, and stablecoin yield rules.

Republican lawmakers have sought Senate consideration of the legislation for several months. Current vote estimates indicate supporters still lack sufficient backing to advance debate. Negotiators continue working to resolve disagreements before the CLARITY Act reaches another procedural milestone.

One Democratic aide questioned whether negotiations could survive another political escalation before Congress returns. The aide said, “If they spend in August, it’s done.” That remark underscores concerns that campaign activity could further complicate CLARITY Act negotiations.

Senate Talks Remain Focused on Reaching Consensus

Senator Ruben Gallego questioned whether Republican negotiators were maintaining productive bipartisan discussions around the CLARITY Act. He said, “We are clearly here, trying to engage constructively.” Gallego also added, “At this point, if they’re not engaging, it’s telling me that they don’t want this to happen.”

Some Democratic lawmakers also expressed concern about political spending by crypto-backed organizations before Congress reconvenes in September. They believe additional campaign activity could further strain ongoing bipartisan discussions. Those concerns continue influencing negotiations surrounding the CLARITY Act.

Supporters of the legislation maintain that additional negotiations could still produce a workable compromise before future procedural votes. They believe remaining differences between House and Senate proposals can still be addressed through bipartisan discussions. For now, the CLARITY Act remains dependent on negotiations before any successful cloture vote can proceed.

Senate negotiations continue without a confirmed breakthrough before the expected procedural vote. The immediate future of the CLARITY Act now depends on whether bipartisan negotiators resolve outstanding disputes. Until then, Democratic resistance continues creating uncertainty over this week’s planned Senate action.

The United States and the United Kingdom used a recent bilateral meeting to signal continued alignment on digital-asset oversight, focusing in particular on stablecoin regulation, cross-border payments, and the structure of tokenized markets. The discussion took place during the 13th session of the UK–US Financial Regulatory Working Group (FRWG) in London on July 8.

In an Aug. 4 joint statement summarizing the meeting, US officials told their UK counterparts they are updating implementation details for the GENIUS Act, alongside ongoing work on how digital asset markets should be regulated. The statement also highlighted broader efforts on payment modernization and participation in the G20 Cross-border Payments Roadmap.

Key takeaways

• The July 8 FRWG meeting reinforced US–UK policy coordination around stablecoins, digital asset market structure, and tokenization.
• US officials provided an update on implementing the UK-referenced GENIUS Act and related stablecoin work, but no new policy measures were announced.
• Cross-border payments modernization remains a shared priority, with both governments pointing to international work under the G20 roadmap.
• UK stablecoin regulation is evolving as the Bank of England and other authorities reassess earlier approaches amid competitive momentum from the US.

FRWG meeting places GENIUS Act implementation and market structure front and center

The FRWG meeting covered several areas that regulators typically treat as interconnected: stablecoin rules, the way digital-asset markets operate in the US, tokenization, and the UK’s “Wholesale Financial Markets Digital Strategy.” Those topics matter because stablecoins are often the settlement layer for payments and tokenized instruments, while regulatory frameworks for market structure influence how exchanges, brokers, custodians, and trading venues adapt to digital assets.

According to the Aug. 4 joint statement released by the US Treasury, the US side shared updates with the UK about implementing the GENIUS Act—framed as the country’s landmark stablecoin legislation—along with work on digital asset market structure. The statement also indicates that participants discussed payment modernization initiatives and international coordination on cross-border payments through the G20 Cross-border Payments Roadmap.

While the meeting did not yield new regulatory actions, it did reinforce a familiar theme in transatlantic policy: the desire to keep pace with fast-moving market developments without undermining financial stability. Notably, the statement described a “responsible” approach to digital-asset innovation, while still emphasizing oversight and the need for international regulatory cooperation.

US–UK coordination extends beyond stablecoins to tokenization and payments

The FRWG meeting appears to fit into a broader effort by the two governments to coordinate on financial innovation. Earlier, on July 14, the Transatlantic Taskforce for Markets of the Future—an initiative aimed at strengthening cooperation on financial innovation and capital markets—published initial recommendations together with a joint statement on stablecoins.

That earlier announcement said the measures would help set the foundation for continued US–UK leadership in digital assets and capital markets. Taken alongside the July 8 FRWG discussion, it suggests regulators are treating stablecoin policy not as an isolated topic, but as part of a larger strategy that includes tokenized finance and how payments infrastructure evolves.

For investors and operators, the implication is straightforward: regulatory decisions in one country may influence how compliant products and services are designed for the other. Even when there are no immediate new rules, ongoing coordination can reduce uncertainty for cross-border issuers, market intermediaries, and firms building payment and tokenization applications intended to serve both jurisdictions.

UK stablecoin review accelerates as US regulation gains momentum

UK policymakers’ renewed attention to stablecoins arrives at a time when some observers believe the US is pulling ahead. The rationale is that the GENIUS Act has created clearer traction for regulated, dollar-backed stablecoin activity, providing a benchmark for other jurisdictions to respond to.

Within the UK, the Bank of England has reportedly softened its stance after earlier controversy over potential limits. Cointelegraph previously reported that the BoE was considering alternatives to temporary limits on stablecoin holdings and reviewing whether a proposal requiring at least 40% of reserve assets to be held as non-interest-bearing deposits at the central bank was too restrictive. Separate coverage also noted the BoE’s ongoing work to calibrate regulation in a way that supports stability without overly constraining legitimate market participation.

At the same time, the UK’s Financial Conduct Authority has signaled where it sees near-term real-world value. Earlier in the year, the FCA pointed to cross-border payments as one of the “clearest near-term use cases” for stablecoins, emphasizing that regulators increasingly recognize the technology’s potential—not just as a trading asset, but as a component of payments systems.

For market participants, these signals together indicate that the UK is attempting to thread a needle: maintain strong financial stability requirements while ensuring its framework does not lag in usability and competitiveness relative to the US approach.

What to watch next: implementation details and remaining UK constraints

With the FRWG meeting described as a coordination exercise rather than a source of new rules, the practical question for the market is what happens next in implementation—especially in the US under the GENIUS Act—and whether the UK continues adjusting aspects of its earlier stablecoin proposals. Readers should watch for further clarity from UK authorities on reserve requirements and for concrete milestones tied to stablecoin market-structure work, since those details will likely determine how quickly compliant dollar-backed stablecoin services can expand across borders.

SpaceX has expanded its partnership with NVIDIA to power Starmind, a proposed network of orbital data centers designed to process artificial intelligence workloads in space.

SpaceX adds NVIDIA chips to Starmind network

SpaceX plans to equip its Starmind satellites with NVIDIA’s Rubin graphics processing units and Vera central processing units. The hardware forms part of NVIDIA’s Space-1 platform, which was developed for AI processing and other computing workloads in orbit.

The partnership expands NVIDIA’s list of space-computing customers after the chipmaker introduced the platform in March. Its initial launch partners included Aetherflux, Axiom Space, Kepler Communications, Planet Labs, Sophia Space and Starcloud.

SpaceX was not included in the original announcement but has now joined the companies working with NVIDIA on orbital computing. Musk later said SpaceX would build its AI infrastructure exclusively on NVIDIA platforms and described Vera Rubin as the strongest available option.

The companies also plan to jointly design computing payloads for future satellites, according to reports following SpaceX’s investor call.

NVIDIA says its Space-1 Vera Rubin module combines GPUs, CPUs and high-bandwidth connections in a system designed for the power and weight limits of satellites. It can run large language models and process data in orbit instead of transmitting all raw information back to Earth.

One million satellites still need FCC approval

SpaceX’s broader plan remains subject to regulatory approval in the United States. The company filed an application in January seeking permission to launch and operate as many as one million non-geostationary satellites.

The proposed system would operate between 500 and 2,000 kilometers above Earth. SpaceX said optical links would connect the satellites through a high-capacity network capable of moving data between orbital computing nodes.

The Federal Communications Commission accepted the application for filing in February and opened it for public comment. That procedural decision did not constitute final approval, correcting reports that the FCC had already authorized the full constellation.

The requested scale is far larger than the existing satellite population around Earth. It could also face questions involving orbital congestion, collision risks, radio interference and effects on astronomical observations.

SPCX and NVIDIA shares rally

SPCX closed Tuesday at $125.33, up $10.80, or 9.43%, after investors responded to the NVIDIA partnership ahead of SpaceX’s earnings report.

However, the stock reversed course after the closing bell. SPCX fell 6.82% to $116.78 in after-hours trading as investors assessed the company’s quarterly results and AI spending plans.

NVIDIA shares gained 3.03% to $212.91 during Tuesday afternoon trading. The move reflected investor expectations that orbital data centers could create another market for the chipmaker’s AI computing hardware.

NVIDIA says its Space-1 Vera Rubin module can provide up to 25 times the AI computing power of an H100 GPU. The platform is designed for space-based inference, autonomous operations and real-time satellite-data processing.

SpaceX faces cost and execution questions

Starmind could allow SpaceX to combine its launch capabilities, Starlink communications network and AI operations within one infrastructure project. However, deploying orbital data centers would require large investments in satellites, launches, power generation and thermal management.

SpaceX must also demonstrate that the system can operate safely alongside existing spacecraft before receiving final FCC authorization. Even if approved, the company would likely deploy the network in stages rather than launching the full requested number.

For U.S. investors, the NVIDIA agreement provides a clearer hardware path for SpaceX’s AI strategy. The next tests will be regulatory progress, the cost of building the constellation, and whether orbital computing can produce enough revenue to justify the required spending.

SpaceX (SPCX), Elon Musk’s space technology company, reported its first quarterly results as a public company on Tuesday, announcing second-quarter revenue of $7.8 billion.

That figure topped Wall Street expectations of $6.9 billion, while narrowing its quarterly loss to $541 million as growth accelerated across its launch, Starlink and AI businesses.

The company reported a net loss of $541 million, an improvement from a $1.0 billion loss a year earlier, while adjusted EBITDA nearly tripled to $3.5 billion.

The firm held onto its stash of 18,712 bitcoin BTC$64,192.02, according to the SEC filing. However, the value of holdings declined to $1.10 billion at June 30 from $1.64 billion at the end of 2025, coinciding with bitcoin’s 33% price slump through that period.

SPCX was down 6% after-hours on the report to $118 after closing the regular session nearly 10% higher on the day’s trading, while the Nasdaq 100 gained 3.3%.

The firm’s report arrived less than two months after SpaceX’s record-breaking $86 billion IPO and ahead of the stock’s first major test. On Aug. 6, roughly 912 million shares held by employees and early backers will become eligible for sale, potentially increasing the stock’s public float.