Connect with us

Crypto World

Flare tokenomics revamp drives staking to 21.5B FLR

Published

on

Flare tokenomics revamp drives staking to 21.5B FLR

Flare has recorded a roughly 34% increase in staked FLR since July, taking the total to 21.5 billion tokens as its revised economic model cuts inflation and ties more network activity to token burns and protocol revenue.

Summary

  • Flare staking increased from about 16 billion to 21.5 billion FLR after the July upgrade.
  • FIP.16 reduced annual FLR inflation from 5% to 3% and lowered its issuance ceiling.
  • Transaction-fee burns have risen to more than 10 times their level before the network upgrade.
  • FIRE has collected $31,438 from four revenue sources since it started operating in May.

Flare staking has increased to 21.5 billion FLR

DefiLlama Research reported on Sept. 4 that Flare’s tokenomics changes are producing measurable onchain results four months after the network approved FIP.16.

Staked FLR rose from approximately 16 billion in July to 21.5 billion, an increase of about 34%. The portion of all staked or delegated FLR held in staking climbed from roughly 32% in April to 46% by late August, with much of the increase occurring within weeks of the July 14 network upgrade.

Advertisement

Under FIP.16, FLR locked on Flare’s P-chain carries five times the signing weight of wrapped FLR delegated on its C-chain. Delegated tokens remain liquid and can be withdrawn at any time, while P-chain staking requires holders to lock their capital with a validator.

Signing weight determines how much influence infrastructure providers have when producing blocks and operating Flare’s native data systems. Providers run the Flare Time Series Oracle, which supplies price feeds, and the Flare Data Connector, which verifies information from other blockchains and Web2 services.

Before FIP.16, different Flare protocols calculated voting weight in different ways. The revised system applies one calculation across FTSO anchor feeds, FDC, and block-latency feeds, with locked stake receiving the fivefold weighting.

Advertisement

Flare’s official governance proposal said the change was designed to put more influence behind committed capital and make the network’s core services equally costly to attack.

At the same time, the July upgrade raised the maximum stake per validator from 200 million to 300 million FLR. It also introduced a network-wide minimum delegation fee of 20%, replacing the previous minimum of zero.

Flare said the fee floor should prevent providers from competing through unsustainably low charges. Infrastructure providers must operate validators, collect data, maintain independent systems, and participate in governance, according to the proposal.

Flare tokenomics changes cut inflation and raise burns

Annual FLR inflation fell from 5% to 3% on May 14, cutting the headline rate by 40%. The annual issuance ceiling also declined from 5 billion to 3 billion FLR.

Advertisement

With an inflatable supply of about 87 billion tokens, the 3% rate produces a gross yearly issuance of roughly 2.6 billion FLR, according to DefiLlama Research. Actual issuance may decrease over time because FIP.16 also changed, which balances count toward the calculation.

Permanently burned FLR, tokens held by the Flare Income Reinvestment Entity, and unearned rewards placed in certain penalty pools are excluded from the inflation base. As those balances increase, the amount subject to the 3% calculation becomes smaller.

Transaction burns accelerated after Flare implemented its Granite upgrade on July 14. Official network release notes show that the minimum C-chain base fee increased from 25 gwei to 500 gwei.

All FLR paid as base transaction fees are permanently destroyed. Flare had burned 15.6 million FLR through transaction fees in 2026 by the time DefiLlama published its report, with more than 40% of the total burned following the July upgrade.

Advertisement

Consequently, the current burn pace sits at more than 10 times its pre-upgrade baseline. Usage determines the amount destroyed because every transaction removes FLR without requiring a new vote or a treasury decision.

Higher gas settings have not made simple transfers expensive in dollar terms. DefiLlama estimated that a basic transfer costs around 0.064 FLR, although transactions involving smart contracts may consume more gas.

Activity feeding the burn mechanism has also expanded through Flare’s FAssets system. In May, an FAssets v1.3 upgrade allowed users to mint FXRP from centralized exchanges such as Binance and Kraken through an XRP Ledger destination tag. FLR rose 14% on the day the upgrade went live, crypto.news reported at the time.

FIRE has started collecting network revenue

FIP.16 created FIRE as a governed entity responsible for receiving revenue generated by Flare’s protocols. Its primary mandate permits the entity to reduce FLR supply through token burns and open-market purchases.

Advertisement

Secondary uses include supporting asset issuers, application yields, liquidity programs and the Flare Foundation’s network operations. Flare initially administers the entity through its foundation.

Four income sources are already active. FIRE receives all FAssets minting fees, 90% of FDC request fees, 10% of FAssets redemption fees, and FLR paid for FXRP destination-tag registrations.

Since collections began in May, FIRE has received assets worth $31,438, according to the DefiLlama report. FAssets minting provided $18,248 across 7,708 mints, making it the largest source.

FDC request fees contributed another $12,676 after collections from that service began on Aug. 18. Destination-tag registrations added $505, while FAssets redemption fees supplied $9.

Advertisement

Two sources pay FIRE in FLR, and two pay in FXRP. As a result, the pool’s reported dollar value changes with token prices as well as the volume of protocol activity.

FDC activity supports several services behind those revenue streams. Flare uses the connector to verify payments and events outside its network, including XRP Ledger transactions involved in creating FXRP.

A July update simplified FXRP access by allowing users to mint the asset and enter selected vaults with one XRP Ledger signature. At the time, FXRP deployed in DeFi had increased from 82 million in February to 144 million, while users had created nearly 24,000 Flare Smart Accounts.

FIRE’s current receipts remain small compared with approximately 2.6 billion FLR in estimated gross annual issuance. Flare’s model therefore still relies mainly on reduced inflation and transaction burns rather than on enough protocol income to offset token creation.

Advertisement

Planned income from Flare Smart Accounts, Confidential Compute, and protocol-level maximal extractable value has yet to enter FIRE. Flare said its MEV system would capture value from permitted activities such as liquidations, atomic arbitrage, cross-chain arbitrage, and just-in-time liquidity.

According to Flare’s April explanation of FIP.16, its DeFi ecosystem processed more than 660,000 transactions involving cyclic-arbitrage structures and over 1,000 liquidation events during the first quarter of 2026. The company said the amount that FIRE could collect from MEV would depend on the volume and type of DeFi transactions processed by the network.

FXRP activity connects Flare with U.S.-regulated RLUSD

FAssets give tokens from networks without smart-contract support a usable form on Flare. FXRP represents XRP within that system, allowing holders to place the asset in lending markets, liquidity pools, vaults, and other decentralized applications.

Flare said in April that more than 150 million FXRP was in circulation, with about 85% deployed across DeFi. At that point, the network had more than $160 million in total value locked under DefiLlama’s standard calculation and over 880,000 active addresses.

Advertisement

Part of that activity now reaches Ethereum. In August, FXRP received approval as collateral in Sentora’s RLUSD Main vault on Morpho, allowing holders to borrow Ripple’s dollar-backed stablecoin without selling their XRP exposure.

The RLUSD lending market provides a relevant U.S. connection because Ripple received approval for the stablecoin from the New York Department of Financial Services in December 2024. Sentora reviewed FXRP’s liquidity, price behavior, oracle design and liquidation mechanics before accepting it as collateral.

Morpho uses isolated lending markets, limiting problems with one collateral asset to its specific pool rather than exposing every market in the protocol. Borrowers must deposit more FXRP than the value of RLUSD they receive, and liquidations depend on enough FXRP liquidity being available to repay lenders.

FIRE may move to joint community governance after its first year. Initiating the change requires support from holders representing at least 50% of Flare’s total inflatable FLR supply, after which the network would elect four representatives from infrastructure providers operating across Flare and Songbird.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

Crypto World

Polymarket Ukraine Odds for Russia Ceasefire Slashed to 13%

Published

on

Polymarket Ukraine odds for a year-end ceasefire sit at 13%, but the 10-day rule raises the bar for settlement under this contract.

Polymarket Ukraine odds for a Russia ceasefire by December 31, 2026, have crashed to just 13%, down from 40% yesterday. The nearer-dated October 31 contract was priced lower, at a 7% implied probability. Both figures depend on a resolution rule that requires more than a diplomatic announcement.

The Polymarket event resolves Yes only if a ceasefire takes effect by 11:59 p.m. Eastern European Time on the stated date and remains continuously in force for at least 10 calendar days.

Polymarket Ukraine odds for a year-end ceasefire sit at 13%, but the 10-day rule raises the bar for settlement under this contract.
SOURCE: Polymarket

A ceasefire announced on December 30 that ends before the 10-calendar-day requirement is met would not satisfy the market’s rule. That creates a materially higher bar than a diplomatic announcement alone.

On the other hand, Kalshi does not have an active market for a possible ceasefire between Ukraine and Russia, opting instead for whether Zelensky will visit Russia this year and whether he and Putin will meet.

Check Out The Ukrainian Conflict Markets on Kalshi and Claim $25 For Free

Advertisement

Polymarket Ukraine Odds for a Ceasefire: What the 13% Price Does and Doesn’t Measure

The pricing implies that a qualifying ceasefire by year-end remains unlikely, rather than simply indicating that talks or a temporary lull in fighting are unlikely.

Those are distinct outcomes under the market rules. A short pause, a partial agreement, or an announced truce that does not remain in effect for 10 full calendar days would not meet the condition for a Yes resolution.

Advertisement

The snapshot reports about $1.8M in total volume, $327,300 in liquidity, and $621,390 in open interest. The source also states that no trader count is provided and that the dated contracts share a single event structure.

As a result, reported market depth does not establish broad, independent participation, and prices across the October and December timeframes may reflect concentrated views or correlated positioning rather than separate assessments of each deadline.

The market summary identifies the European Union’s individual-sanctions rollover around September 15 as a near-term policy test of Western cohesion, pressure on Russia, and diplomatic room.

EU individual sanctions were extended through September 15. A renewal, loosening, or visible disagreement could alter expectations for negotiations and a durable ceasefire, although the source notes that policy signals need not produce a ceasefire.

Advertisement

Earn $50 and Enter $300K Prize Draw on EdgeX

Scenarios that Could Reprice the Contracts

The market summary says a year-end ceasefire would become more plausible if autumn diplomacy produced a framework that survived the 10-day continuity test, particularly after the UNGA period and sanctions-related signaling in September.

It identifies sustained talks, a monitored pause in attacks, or a formal settlement mechanism accepted by both sides as developments that could support such a framework.

Advertisement

Conversely, the summary says the December deadline could lose support if negotiations stall, sanctions harden, or the war escalates into winter.

Its October analysis similarly describes a fast diplomatic breakthrough around UNGA week and a shift in EU sanctions politics as factors that could be needed to reach the earlier deadline.

The EU’s individual sanctions rollover, with listings extended through September 15, remains a policy checkpoint noted in the market summary. The UN General Assembly’s high-level week follows shortly afterward and may provide a concentrated period for diplomatic signaling or initiatives.

New participation or large position changes on the Polymarket Ukraine odds of a ceasefire could also move reported odds independently of real-world developments.

Advertisement

Because the breadth of participation cannot be verified from the available data, market prices should be read alongside its specific resolution rules, shared event structure, liquidity, and the possibility of concentrated positioning.

Make Your Prediction Count With $25 For Free on Kalshi

The post Polymarket Ukraine Odds for Russia Ceasefire Slashed to 13% appeared first on Cryptonews.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Crypto World

Trump Shares Map Renaming New Mexico as ‘New America’

Published

on

Trump Shares Map Renaming New Mexico as 'New America'

Trump’s habit of renaming things—often after America or himself

It also follows Trump signing an Executive Order renaming Lake Ontario as “Lake America” on Aug. 27, amid a widening trade war with Canada. The change was met with widespread disapproval from both U.S. lawmakers and Canadian politicians, who vowed Lake Ontario will continue to be called by that name.

The order applies to U.S. federal references of the lake and does not determine how Canada—or others—refer to the body of water. U.S. users of Google Maps and Apple Maps, however, will notice the change reflected.

Trump has often turned to name changes as a show of power and a way to undermine his perceived adversaries.

Advertisement

After returning to the White House last year, Trump signed an Executive Order renaming the Gulf of Mexico as the “Gulf of America.” The name has since been used by federal agencies and departments to refer to the sea south of the U.S., and was updated for U.S. users on Google Maps and Apple Maps.

Source link

Continue Reading

Crypto World

Bitcoin Holds Near $80K as Weekend Gains Stall

Published

on

Crypto Breaking News

Bitcoin eased on Monday after failing to hold onto weekend momentum, with the price slipping back toward the high-$70,000s as liquidity thinned during the Labor Day holiday in the United States. The pullback comes shortly after BTC posted its first weekly close above $80,000 since early May.

At the time of writing, TradingView data showed BTC/USD down nearly 2% on the day. With major US markets closed for the holiday, thinner order books increased the odds of sharper, liquidity-driven moves in both directions—rather than a steady trend.

Key takeaways

  • Bitcoin is trading about 2% lower and sits below $80,000 after its strongest weekly close above that level since early May.
  • Labor Day has left markets with thinner liquidity, which can amplify sudden moves as traders seek liquidity above and below spot.
  • CoinGlass data shows liquidation pressure was roughly balanced between long and short positions over the past 24 hours.
  • QCP Capital said volatility has compressed, suggesting investors are waiting for external catalysts—particularly US inflation data later this week.
  • Analysts highlighted “resilience,” noting BTC has absorbed recent macro shocks while remaining supported within a narrow range since mid-August.

Why Monday’s dip looks liquidity-driven

TradingView charts indicated BTC/USD down close to 2% at the time of writing, after the benchmark briefly regained traction over the weekend and notched its first weekly close above $80,000 since early May. Monday’s decline reflects a market environment where directional conviction can weaken when participants thin out.

Because US markets were closed for Labor Day, order books tended to be thinner, increasing the likelihood of abrupt repricing toward nearby liquidity pools. CoinGlass liquidation data, covering the prior 24 hours, showed cross-crypto liquidations totaling about $178 million, with liquidations split evenly between long and short positions.

CoinGlass also flagged notable nearby concentrations that could act as short-term magnets for price action—around $80,500 above and $78,800 below. As liquidity accumulates near these levels, even modest flows can push prices toward those areas.

Advertisement

By the end of the day’s early trading, liquidity appeared to thicken somewhat, but the key takeaway is that the market’s near-term behavior has looked less like sustained selling and more like positioning around known liquidation zones.

Traders wait for US inflation as volatility compresses

While BTC remains range-bound, analysts argue the market is preparing for a potential shift once macro data lands. QCP Capital pointed to declining overall volatility, suggesting traders are not aggressively pricing a clear directional outcome ahead of the week’s main catalyst.

The catalyst in focus is US inflation data later in the week—scheduled for release on Thursday and Friday. The reason traders care is straightforward: inflation readings influence expectations around the Federal Reserve’s path for interest-rate hikes, which can quickly alter risk appetite across crypto.

In its latest analysis, QCP Capital wrote that near-term volatility compression, despite the approach of key catalysts, “reflects a market waiting for clarity rather than pricing in strong directional views.” QCP added that “the market is positioned for a directional break once the inflation data arrives.”

Advertisement

That framing matters for traders because it suggests this dip may not be a definitive trend change. Instead, it may represent a pause while participants hold back until they can better assess the implications for rates and yields.

BTC’s “resilience” inside a narrow range

Despite Monday’s downtick, analysts see evidence that Bitcoin has managed to absorb recent macro turbulence without breaking down. BTC/USD has been trading in a confined range since Aug. 21, yet it has retained the majority of the roughly 25% gains it built earlier last month.

In comments to Cointelegraph, Ryan Lee, chief analyst at Bitget, said Bitcoin has “digested” last week’s macro volatility trigger—referring to a surprise uptick in nonfarm payrolls numbers. The implication of stronger employment data is typically higher yields and a firmer dollar, conditions that can be challenging for risk assets.

Lee argued that the resilience is notable precisely because employment strength would ordinarily push those rates dynamics in a way that makes it harder for assets like Bitcoin to maintain momentum. “The market’s ability to absorb that repricing suggests investors are not treating a potential Fed hike as the only factor driving Bitcoin at current levels,” he said.

Advertisement

In other words, the market may be more balanced in its interpretation: instead of assuming the Fed path is the sole determinant of BTC, investors appear to be letting Bitcoin’s own supply/demand factors and broader positioning contribute alongside macro expectations.

That said, the narrow range also implies that conviction is still limited. If QCP is correct that the market is waiting for clarity, BTC’s resilience may be more about controlled positioning than a confirmed breakout.

Spot ETF flows remain a supporting narrative

Beyond spot price action and macro data, investor attention continues to track US Bitcoin exchange-traded funds. Cointelegraph previously reported that Thursday saw net inflows of $730 million into the US spot Bitcoin ETF cohort.

That figure was described as the highest single-day tally since January, and it has helped keep ETFs in the broader discussion as a potential source of sustained demand. While Monday’s move has pulled price back below $80,000, ETF flows can remain a stabilizing counterweight—particularly if inflows persist around key macro releases.

Advertisement

Investors, however, will still likely treat inflation data as the main swing factor for near-term volatility, with ETF flows providing context rather than an immediate override to macro-driven repricing.

Heading into the next inflation releases, market participants will likely watch for whether compressed volatility breaks into a sustained trend and whether the liquidation levels highlighted by CoinGlass act as temporary boundaries or get swept through. The uncertainty is less about direction in the immediate term and more about how quickly traders reprice Fed expectations once the data confirms the next inflation reality.

Risk & affiliate notice: Crypto assets are volatile and capital is at risk. This article may contain affiliate links. Read full disclosure

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Crypto World

Coldcard Exploiter Moves 45% of Wave 3 Loot as Stolen Bitcoin Enters CoinJoins

Published

on

The exploiter linked to the third wave of attacks on Coldcard wallets has now moved 45% of the coins stolen, according to Galaxy Research.

The firm said the funds have been transferred either to Ethereum through THORChain or into Coinjoin, in an effort to launder the stolen assets. During Wave 3, the exploiter created 293 2-of-2 multisig vaults for victims’ coins.

Wave 3 Haul

The first movements on September 2 sent funds through THORChain to Ethereum, while the latest activity has moved into Coinjoin rounds. Galaxy Research said the operator has been systematically spending the largest share of the thefts according to their size ranking. Ranks 1 through 11 have already been moved.

The next 10 unmoved vaults contain 30.81 BTC, while ranks 61 through 293 hold a combined 33.77 units. The latest transactions led Galaxy to identify a previously unknown vault linked to 58 addresses that are likely associated with Coldcard victims.

Advertisement

Most of the funds stolen in the Coldcard exploit have yet to move. In fact, approximately 82%, across all waves, are still held in the attacker-controlled addresses where the coins were initially stored. The remaining 18% has already been moved, and the transfers are apparently linked to efforts to launder the exploit’s haul.

Aftermath

The attack began on July 30, 2026, and targeted Coldcard wallets with a firmware flaw that had existed for years. The issue came from a March 2021 update and a build error. It made wallets use a weak software random generator instead of their hardware-based source. This weakened seed security from the expected 128 bits to as low as 40 bits on older devices. Attackers could then brute-force the keys without physically accessing the wallets.

Bitcoin activity jumped sharply after the exploit as affected users moved and consolidated their holdings to limit exposure, pushing active addresses to an eight-month high. But the incident had negligible impact on the price of the crypto asset. Instead, BTC posted an impressive rally, nearing $82,000 last month.

The asset has since pulled back but is trading near $79,500 at the time of writing.

Advertisement

The post Coldcard Exploiter Moves 45% of Wave 3 Loot as Stolen Bitcoin Enters CoinJoins appeared first on CryptoPotato.

Source link

Continue Reading

Crypto World

Cozy Finance Exploit Drains $170,000 From DeFi Insurer for a 2nd Time

Published

on

ZachXBT Disowns Copycat Meme Coins, Donates $25,000 to Venezuela Relief

Blockchain security firm Blockaid flagged a Cozy Finance exploit on Optimism early Monday. The attacker drained roughly $170,000 and bridged the funds out within 13 minutes.

Cozy Finance runs protection markets that let users buy cover against DeFi failures. An earlier Optimism attack cost the protocol about $427,000 in August 2025.

Attacker Bridged the Money Out in 13 Minutes

The exploit transaction landed at 05:43 UTC on Monday, according to OP Mainnet explorer data. It moved about 163,326 USDC.e out of the protocol across 63 token transfers.

Meanwhile, the same transaction burned roughly 1.6 million Cozy PToken (CPT). The attacker then approved a token and pushed the funds through a bridge at 05:56 UTC.

Advertisement

That exit came before Blockaid published its alert. Explorer records show no further movement from the wallet since.

The attacker also prepared well ahead. Records show the attack contract went live on September 2, five days before the drain. The wallet drew its first funds from a Relay solver.

Blockaid also named Cozy Set (CSET) as the abused token contract. That contract remains unverified and still holds about $4,168 in USDC.e.

Blockaid. Source: X

Cozy Finance Exploit Repeats a 2025 Failure

This is not the protocol’s first loss on Optimism. An attacker took about $427,000 in August 2025, security firm Verichains found.

The flaw sat in the withdrawal code, which never checked who completed a redemption. Cozy Finance now ranks fifth among insurance protocols on DefiLlama, holding about $1.3 million.

DefiLlama listed roughly $172,000 on the Optimism side. Therefore, the attacker appears to have swept close to the entire deployment there.

Similar raids keep landing across DeFi. Notional Finance lost $1.73 million last week to an integer overflow bug. Days earlier, Full Sail wound down operations after an attacker took roughly $91,000.

Advertisement

Monday brought a far larger case as well. Roughly $320 million in Bitcoin left the Liquid Network, and the actors claimed white hat intentions on-chain.

However, early loss figures often move. Blockaid first sized an August Flow exploit at $9.3 million before the network put the damage near $410,000.

Blockaid promised more detail as it traces the money. The sum is small, yet a second breach on the same chain raises harder questions.

The post Cozy Finance Exploit Drains $170,000 From DeFi Insurer for a 2nd Time appeared first on BeInCrypto.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Crypto World

Will AI Crash Bitcoin 50%? Vitalik Buterin Weighs In

Published

on

Bitcoin Price Performance

Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin has rejected a warning that artificial intelligence (AI) will trigger a Bitcoin crash. He took the opposite side of a claim that BTC could lose more than half its value within two years.

The exchange played out on X on Monday. AI risk commentator Liron Shapira set the terms, and Buterin answered that his portfolio already sits on the other side.

Where the AI Bitcoin Crash Claim Came From

Shapira, who hosts the Doom Debates podcast on AI risk, published his prediction on Monday. He assigned 50% confidence to a fall of more than 50% in BTC prices over two years.

His case for an AI Bitcoin crash rests on security rather than demand. AI, in his view, will erode the guarantees that holders believed protected the network. Buterin answered in the same thread within hours.

Advertisement

Bitcoin’s security rests on mining power and cryptographic hashing. Shapira did not specify which part of Bitcoin security AI would weaken. Similar warnings about AI cyberattacks have spread across the technology sector this year.

Meanwhile, Bitcoin trades near $79,827, so a 50% decline would drag it toward $40,000.

Bitcoin Price Performance
Bitcoin Price Performance. Source: BeInCrypto Markets

Why Buterin Trusts the Network to Adapt

Buterin said he remains optimistic about cybersecurity over the long term. Instead, he treats the transition itself as the harder problem.

He expects Bitcoin to absorb any issue that does not require social consensus. Upgrading clients and mining pools against network-layer attacks falls into that group. He puts the odds of an actual break in hashes or proof of work at close to zero.

Advertisement

Buterin also assumed Shapira would say the same about Ethereum (ETH), since both men hold crypto that would fall together.

Ethereum has spent 2026 preparing for the threat from quantum computing. Researchers have started pricing the cost of post-quantum migration.

Rather than stake money on the disagreement, Buterin pointed at his own balance sheet.

“I would offer a bet, but given what my holdings are I’m basically taking this bet … with ~90% of my net worth already,” Buterin, said via X post

Therefore, the AI Bitcoin crash argument now hangs on timing. Shapira has two years to prove his case, while Buterin already holds the other position.

Advertisement

The post Will AI Crash Bitcoin 50%? Vitalik Buterin Weighs In appeared first on BeInCrypto.

Source link

Continue Reading

Crypto World

Harmony plans to move ONE to Ethereum and shut mainnet

Published

on

FalconX cuts 10% of staff amid crypto downturn

Harmony has proposed closing its seven-year-old Layer 1 blockchain, issuing ONE on Ethereum and directing future token emissions to a new AI video project.

Summary

  • ONE balances would be recorded at Harmony’s final block and recreated as ERC-20 tokens on Ethereum.
  • Users must leave smart contracts by Sept. 10 because applications and liquidity pools cannot migrate automatically.
  • Harmony has reserved $1.372 million to compensate eligible validators and delegators over four quarters.
  • The proposal follows an August exploit that created trillions of unauthorized ONE tokens and prompted a rollback plan.

Harmony said in a Sept. 6 post that the mainnet’s exposure to “state actors” and “AI agents” has made continued operation too risky, leading the team to propose retiring the network it launched in 2019.

The plan remains nonbinding, and Harmony has not announced when it will produce the blockchain’s final block. The team also has not explained whether validators will decide the proposal through the network’s existing governance process.

Advertisement

Under Harmony’s published governance rules, a proposal must receive votes representing at least 51% of total stake weight. Approval requires support from 66.7% of the participating voting power after a seven-day introduction period and a 14-day vote.

Harmony would recreate ONE balances on Ethereum

Rather than asking holders to exchange their tokens manually, Harmony plans to take a snapshot at the final block and distribute replacement ONE tokens on Ethereum. The ERC-20 version would go to the same addresses recorded in the snapshot, removing the need for individual claims.

The snapshot would cover ONE held in personal wallets, staking delegations, unclaimed validator rewards, smart contracts, and centralized exchange accounts. Harmony plans to coordinate with exchanges so that their existing ONE listings can move to the Ethereum-based token.

Advertisement

Delegated tokens and unpaid validator rewards would be handled separately through individual governor vaults. According to the proposal, the total ONE supply and its scheduled issuance rate would remain unchanged during the transition.

To allow outside review of the process, Harmony said it would publish the Ethereum token contract, snapshot calculations, and airdrop scripts. The project has not yet released the contract address or the final snapshot method.

While ordinary wallet balances would be included automatically, several types of holdings cannot be copied to Ethereum in their current form. Harmony said multisignature vaults, liquidity pools, and applications running on the mainnet would not migrate with the token balances.

Users have therefore been asked to withdraw from smart contracts before Sept. 10. Anyone who leaves assets inside a decentralized exchange pool, lending market, or another on-chain application could face complications because the protocol state and its related contracts will not be recreated on Ethereum.

Advertisement

For centralized exchange customers, the process will depend partly on each platform’s support for the migration. Harmony has proposed moving exchange-held balances and listings to the ERC-20 token, although it has not published a list of participating exchanges or their individual timetables.

Validators face separate shutdown conditions

Beginning Sept. 10, validators would be allowed to turn off their nodes as the network prepares for its final block. Harmony has set aside $1.372 million for eligible validators and their delegators, with payments scheduled across four quarterly installments.

Eligibility carries several conditions. Validators must stop their nodes within the required period, retain their stakes, sign an agreement, and continue serving as governors after the mainnet closes. The pool would also cover the difference between the rewards earned at a validator’s last block and the rewards it would have received through the final network block.

Harmony has not disclosed how the $1.372 million will be divided among validators and delegators. Final payments may depend on stake levels and compliance with the proposed agreements, according to the terms described by the team.

Advertisement

Operators could later remain in governance or join Harmony’s planned “remix economy” as operators or affiliates. Future ONE emissions would fund the new AI video initiative, although Harmony said governors could still provide feedback on the arrangement.

Under the proposed model, video creators would publish prompts and related assets that fans could copy and alter. AI agents would turn the resulting branches into additional clips, while operators would manage video generation, distribution and content moderation.

Harmony said staking levels and service uptime would affect operator rewards. The project also plans to subsidize graphics processing hardware during the first year and has projected up to $1 million in combined operator revenue, subject to the service and staking requirements.

The business model includes a proposed $10 monthly subscription. Affiliates would receive a recurring 30% commission from users they refer, while Harmony estimated that advertising could produce tens of millions of dollars if the platform reached 1 million users. Both revenue figures remain projections from the project rather than confirmed income.

Advertisement

August exploit pushed Harmony toward a shutdown

The retirement proposal follows an August security breach that produced unauthorized ONE tokens and forced the team to consider reversing several days of blockchain activity.

On Aug. 12, crypto.news reported an unauthorized mint after on-chain researcher Juiceberg estimated that almost 4 billion ONE had been created through empty blocks. The researcher claimed that about 2.8 billion tokens reached centralized exchanges, but Harmony had not confirmed either figure when it first disclosed the incident.

Harmony’s later investigation found that more than 3 trillion ONE had been generated through six transactions. The team linked the exploit to a weakness in cross-shard receipt verification that allowed valid receipts to be processed repeatedly without matching deductions elsewhere on the network.

One wallet connected to the activity attempted 534 transfers of 5 billion ONE within 106 seconds, according to Harmony’s reconstruction. Of the attempted transfers, 477 succeeded and moved a combined 2.385 trillion ONE.

Advertisement

Investigators traced the created tokens to standalone wallets, exchange accounts, decentralized exchange routers, liquidity pools, bridge contracts, wrapped ONE and staking wallets. Harmony said it contacted exchanges, bridges, and law-enforcement agencies while tracking the assets.

By Aug. 17, the team had proposed returning both network shards to checkpoints recorded at 11:25:37 p.m. UTC on Aug. 11. Shard 0 would keep block 92,730,034 and restart from the next block, while shard 1 would return to block 94,978,278 despite not being the origin of the unauthorized mint.

The rollback would remove 141,628 consecutive blocks from shard 0, including 109,126 regular transactions and 315 staking transactions. Harmony classified 104,545 of the regular transactions, or 95.8%, as automated activity, with almost 100,000 tied to decentralized exchange automation.

At the time, the team considered migration but said it would cause more disruption than a rollback. Less than a month later, moving ONE to Ethereum became part of the proposed mainnet closure.

Advertisement

U.S. holders may need detailed migration records

For U.S. token holders, the migration may create tax-record concerns even if Harmony distributes ERC-20 ONE automatically. The IRS treats digital assets as property and requires taxpayers to report sales, exchanges, and other taxable disposals.

IRS guidance says exchanging one digital asset for another that differs materially in kind or extent can produce a capital gain or loss. Harmony describes the replacement as the same ONE token with unchanged supply and emissions, but the agency has not issued guidance addressing this specific mainnet-to-Ethereum migration.

U.S. holders may therefore need to preserve their original purchase records, wallet history, the final Harmony snapshot, and the value of the Ethereum token when received. Exchange customers should also retain any migration notices and Form 1099-DA information supplied by their platforms, since the IRS says taxpayers remain responsible for reporting taxable activity even when a broker does not provide a form.

Harmony had faced security problems before the August incident. In December 2023, the project disclosed that faulty staking logic had created 146.28 million ONE across 74 delegator addresses, prompting an emergency hard fork at block 51,118,080.

Advertisement

Its largest earlier loss came in June 2022, when attackers stole nearly $100 million from the Horizon cross-chain bridge after gaining control of keys used by its multisignature wallet. Harmony responded by raising its hacker bounty to $10 million and working with exchanges, analytics firms, and law enforcement.

A month after the bridge attack, developers proposed minting 4.97 billion ONE to reimburse affected users over three years. Community members opposed the resulting dilution, and Harmony later withdrew the plan in favor of a recovery program that would not add tokens through a hard fork.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Crypto World

Capital B Buys 376 BTC for $29M, Lifts Holdings to 3,521 BTC

Published

on

Crypto Breaking News

French corporate Bitcoin treasury firm Capital B has expanded its holdings with a new purchase of 376 BTC, acquiring the coins for €25.3 million (about $29.5 million). After the deal, Capital B’s total Bitcoin treasury rises to 3,521 BTC, according to a company announcement published Monday.

The acquisition follows Capital B’s capital raises of roughly €30.1 million (about $35 million), which included a private placement backed by investors Adam Back and TOBAM. The company says Swissquote Bank Europe executed the purchase, while Taurus provided custody for the assets.

Key takeaways

  • Capital B bought 376 BTC for €25.3 million, bringing total holdings to 3,521 BTC.
  • The purchase was funded after €30.1 million in capital raises, including a private placement backed by Adam Back and TOBAM.
  • Capital B paid an average of €67,182 per BTC for the latest tranche; its overall average cost across the treasury now sits at €87,878.
  • The latest buy is Capital B’s largest since September 2025, when it acquired 551 BTC for €54.7 million.
  • Capital B now ranks 25th among publicly traded companies by Bitcoin holdings, based on BitcoinTreasuries.net.

Details of Capital B’s latest Bitcoin purchase

Capital B’s latest acquisition consists of 376 Bitcoin purchased at an average price of €67,182 per BTC. In the announcement, the company links the buy to its financing activity completed ahead of the trade.

Execution and custody were handled by third parties: Swissquote Bank Europe carried out the purchase, while Taurus is designated as the custodian. Capital B also distinguishes operational holdings from its treasury reserve, stating that it holds an additional 61 BTC for operational purposes that are kept separate from the company’s Bitcoin treasury and excluded from its Bitcoin-related performance metrics.

Across its Bitcoin treasury program, Capital B reports spending a total of €309.4 million at an average cost basis of €87,878 per BTC. Based on that accumulated position, the firm moved to 25th place among publicly traded companies tracked by BitcoinTreasuries.net.

Advertisement

Why the financing and custody structure matters

Corporate Bitcoin treasury strategies often live or die on execution quality, custody arrangements, and the consistency of funding. In this case, Capital B’s announcement ties the purchase directly to capital raised—roughly €30.1 million—rather than leaving investors to infer the financing source after the fact.

For market participants, the specific counterparties named for execution (Swissquote Bank Europe) and custody (Taurus) are also notable because treasury programs depend on minimizing operational risk. Even when the market impact is not the main driver, reliable custody and clear segregation between operational BTC and treasury BTC can matter for how companies report performance and how investors evaluate treasury discipline.

Capital B’s position in the wider corporate Bitcoin race

Capital B’s purchase adds to a broader pattern seen among corporate Bitcoin holders: while some companies have moved to unwind holdings, others continue adding. The announcement places Capital B among the persistent accumulators—particularly relevant as Bitcoin treasury rankings can shift quickly with even mid-sized acquisitions.

Japan-based Metaplanet, for example, reportedly acquired 2,823 BTC during the second quarter for about $222 million, bringing its total to 43,000 BTC. BitcoinTreasuries.net data cited in the article places Metaplanet third among publicly traded corporate Bitcoin holders, behind Strategy and Twenty One Capital.

Advertisement

Meanwhile, Sweden-based H100 Group reportedly expanded its treasury in August after an all-share deal involving Norwegian companies holding 2,455 BTC. That transaction reportedly lifted H100’s holdings to 3,506 BTC, positioning it as Europe’s second-largest publicly traded corporate holder at the time. Capital B’s latest buy leaves it 15 BTC ahead of H100, while both remain behind Germany’s Bitcoin Group SE, which holds 3,605 BTC, according to the cited ranking data.

At the top end of the corporate list, Strategy—described as the world’s largest corporate Bitcoin holder—resumed buying in August after a pause of two months. The article states Strategy purchased 4,603 BTC for $370 million, bringing total holdings to 845,050 BTC at an aggregated purchase value of $63.3 billion, again referencing BitcoinTreasuries.net for rank context.

What to watch after the September 2025 high-water mark

Capital B’s newest tranche is its largest acquisition since September 2025, when it bought 551 BTC for €54.7 million. That matters because it suggests the firm has not been buying at a comparable scale for most of the interim period, even if smaller additions or operational balance changes may have occurred.

Going forward, investors will likely focus on whether Capital B maintains a steady cadence of treasury purchases—especially given that the latest deal appears tied to fresh capital raising. The key uncertainty is how quickly (and at what average prices) future acquisitions will follow, and whether treasury growth continues to translate into meaningful movement within the publicly traded rankings tracked by BitcoinTreasuries.net.

Advertisement

For now, Capital B’s updated holdings and cost basis provide a clear snapshot of where the company stands in the competitive landscape of corporate Bitcoin accumulation—and its next reported treasury purchase will determine whether it can keep closing the gap to Europe’s largest peers.

Risk & affiliate notice: Crypto assets are volatile and capital is at risk. This article may contain affiliate links. Read full disclosure

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Crypto World

Bitcoin Traders Are Surprisingly Calm Ahead of CPI and the Fed: Is a Big Move Coming?

Published

on

Bitcoin has spent the past several days struggling to decisively break past $80,000, and options traders don’t appear too concerned about an imminent volatility explosion despite the major economic events in the next ten days.

QCP Capital’s latest market analysis suggests that BTC’s 18-day at-the-money implied volatility currently sits at just 37%-38%, despite the upcoming US inflation report and the subsequent FOMC meeting.

Waiting for Clarity

The analysts believe the volatility compression reflects a market waiting for additional information rather than traders expressing strong directional conviction. This narrative received some confirmation last week after the release of the August jobs report, which significantly exceeded expectations, with the US economy adding 162,000 jobs compared to forecasts of around 55,000. Unemployment remained at 4.1% while average hourly earnings increased 0.3% MoM.

The reading strengthened the argument that the US remains resilient and shifted attention back toward inflation and the Fed’s next move. Markets now assign a 58% probability of a 25-basis-point rate hike at the September 15-16 meeting.

Advertisement

Major institutions have also turned hawkish, especially after Kevin Warsh’s speech at the end of August. UBS expects the central bank to raise rates in September and also in December after previously forecasting no changes this year.

Aside from a brief retracement by a few grand, Bitcoin has remained resilient, surging past $82,000 last week before it calmed at just under $80,000.

CPI Can Tilt the Market

The next big test comes with the August inflation data, to be announced during the current big economic week. Producer inflation will provide the first signal on Thursday, followed by the considerably more important Consumer Price Index on Friday.

The latter could materially alter expectations surrounding the upcoming Fed decision. As usual, a hotter-than-expected reading would provide the central bank more leeway for a rate hike, potentially pushing Treasury yields higher and creating additional pressure on risk assets like bitcoin.

Advertisement

The inflation threat has become particularly relevant as oil prices continue climbing amid renewed US-Iran strikes. Brent crude neared $100 per barrel on Monday, while markets are already assigning increasing probabilities to rate hikes from several major central banks.

A softer reading could reduce the pressure on policymakers to act and potentially provide BTC with the catalyst to finally break through $82,000. Nevertheless, QCP’s analysts do not expect a dramatic breakout in either direction.

The post Bitcoin Traders Are Surprisingly Calm Ahead of CPI and the Fed: Is a Big Move Coming? appeared first on CryptoPotato.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Crypto World

Bitcoin $80K Breakout Faces Rising Rate Pressure, CoinShares Says

Published

on

Bitcoin $80K Breakout Faces Rising Rate Pressure, CoinShares Says

Crypto fund flows are becoming increasingly sensitive to changes in the US interest-rate outlook, with CoinShares arguing that Federal Reserve policy remains a key barrier to Bitcoin (BTC) breaking above $80,000 despite continued investor demand for crypto.

In his latest market update, CoinShares head of research James Butterfil argued that “Bitcoin is trading like gold again, but the Fed still sets the ceiling” at around $80,000.

That sensitivity was evident after Fed Chair Kevin Warsh’s speech at Jackson Hole. Warsh said progress on inflation had been modest and that price pressures were not easing quickly enough to give the central bank’s policy makers the confidence inflation was returning to its 2% target. Roughly $100 million exited digital asset investment products immediately after the speech, as markets sharply increased the probability of a September rate hike.

Flows reversed over the following week, reaching $1 billion by Sept. 4. The turnaround coincided with comments from Fed Governor Christopher Waller, who pointed to recent signs of “disinflation” and said he was inclined to keep rates steady in September if upcoming inflation data showed further progress.

Advertisement

“Investors are not exiting the asset class,” Butterfill wrote. “They are trading the rate path.”

As of Monday, Fed Funds futures prices implied a roughly 60% chance of a rate hike following next week’s Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) meeting, according to CME Group.

Markets are now pricing in a 25 basis-point rate hike on Sept. 16. Source: CME Group

The movements suggest that Bitcoin and broader digital asset markets remain highly sensitive to shifts in liquidity and monetary policy. Easier financial conditions have historically supported crypto and other risk assets.

Advertisement

Related: Crypto Biz: AI took a back seat when Bitcoin started climbing

Treasury buybacks add to liquidity backdrop

CoinShares’ assessment comes against the backdrop of a strong rebound in Bitcoin and the broader digital asset market last month, when the US Treasury announced plans to double certain long-dated bond buybacks from $2 billion to $4 billion per operation. Bitcoin climbed from the low $60,000s to above $80,000 during the month. 

The expanded buyback program is expected to run from Sept. 9 through Nov. 4.

“Around the Treasury announcement we also saw equity sell-offs and shifts across the yield curve, layered on top of the ongoing noise from the Iran war — oil and equities swinging depending on whether or not people are feeling optimistic about diplomacy on any given day,” wrote 21shares co-founder Ophelia Snyder in her Substack newsletter last week.

Advertisement

“Taken together, these factors suggest to me that the current Bitcoin rally may have less to do with crypto-specific catalysts and more to do with growing interest in de-risking exposure to the US specifically,” she added.

The move reinforced the market’s focus on liquidity conditions and prompted Standard Chartered to forecast that Bitcoin could reach $100,000 before the end of the year.

Related: Strategy’s $66B Bitcoin machine hinges on capital markets, not BTC price: Report

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2025