Crypto World
how $4 billion in bond operations moved Bitcoin 8% in a day
The U.S. Treasury doubled its long-end buyback operations on Aug. 19, compressing yields and triggering the largest single-day crypto rally since March. This is the plumbing story nobody else traced.
Summary
- The U.S. Treasury announced it will at least double the maximum size of its liquidity support buyback operations for 10-to-20-year and 20-to-30-year nominal coupon securities from $2 billion to at least $4 billion per operation, effective Sep. 9 through Nov. 4, 2026.
- The 30-year Treasury yield fell from a 19-year high of 5.34% to 5.19%, a drop of roughly 15 basis points from the Tuesday peak and 9 basis points on the announcement day alone.
- Bitcoin rallied 8.2% in under 12 hours, moving from an intraday low of $64,100 to a peak of $69,500, its highest level since early June.
- Forced short liquidations totaled $1.44 billion across major exchanges, with $1.29 billion closing within a single hour, the fastest concentrated squeeze of 2026.
- U.S. spot Bitcoin ETFs recorded a combined $487 million in net inflows across Aug. 17 and 18, with BlackRock IBIT capturing $143.6 million on Aug. 18 alone, confirming institutional participation before the rally accelerated.
On Aug. 19, 2026, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent did something that barely made the front page of most financial outlets but moved more capital in a single afternoon than any Federal Reserve statement this year. The Treasury Department announced it would at least double the size of its long-end liquidity support buyback operations, raising the per-operation maximum from $2 billion to at least $4 billion for securities in the 10-to-20-year and 20-to-30-year maturity sectors.
The bond market reacted within minutes. The 30-year yield, which had touched a 19-year high above 5.34% the prior session, dropped 9 basis points to 5.19%. The 10-year fell to 4.647%. Stocks rose. And Bitcoin, which had been drifting sideways near $64,000 for most of the week, surged 8.2% to $69,500 in under 12 hours.
The move was not random. It followed a specific transmission chain that this piece traces step by step, from the Treasury press release to the crypto liquidation cascade, with the actual dollar flows at each node. Most coverage of the day focused on the price action itself. This piece focuses on the plumbing: what moved, why it moved, and how much money was involved at each stage of the chain.
What the Treasury actually announced
The official press release landed on the morning of Aug. 19. It contained a single operative change: beginning Sep. 9 and running through Nov. 4, 2026, the maximum size of nominal long-end liquidity support buyback operations would rise from $2 billion to at least $4 billion per operation. The number of long-end operations would also increase from two to four per quarter.
The program targets off-the-run securities. When the Treasury issues a new 10-year note, the previous 10-year note becomes off-the-run. It carries the same credit quality but trades less frequently, which makes it more expensive for primary dealers to hold on their balance sheets. The buyback program gives those dealers a reliable exit, allowing them to sell illiquid older bonds back to the government.
Critically, this is not quantitative easing. The Treasury funds these purchases by issuing new benchmark debt, often shifting duration toward shorter-dated paper and Treasury bills. Total net federal debt remains unchanged. What changes is the composition: less illiquid long-end paper sitting on dealer balance sheets, more liquid short-end paper in the market.
The Treasury stated the increase “reflects a desire to provide greater liquidity support in longer-dated nominal sectors.”
Analysts at Evercore ISI offered a blunter interpretation: Bessent was “hitting bond shorts with a surprise buyback on an August day with thin liquidity.”
Why yield compression is a crypto catalyst
The relationship between long-end Treasury yields and risk assets runs through a concept called the term premium, the extra compensation investors demand for holding long-dated government debt instead of rolling short-term bills. When the term premium rises, it signals that investors see more uncertainty ahead. Capital retreats from speculative assets and parks in guaranteed yield.
When the term premium compresses, the opposite happens. The relative attractiveness of risk assets improves because the guaranteed yield on safe havens falls. Capital that was earning 5.34% on 30-year Treasuries suddenly faces a lower return, pushing portfolio managers further out on the risk curve.
On Aug. 19, the 30-year yield fell from 5.34% to 5.19%. The 10-year dropped to 4.647% after trading near 4.75% earlier in the week. In dollar terms, these moves represent billions in mark-to-market gains for holders of long-dated bonds and, by extension, a loosening of financial conditions across the entire risk spectrum.
The scale of that repricing deserves a closer look. The outstanding stock of U.S. Treasury securities with remaining maturities above 10 years exceeds $7 trillion at face value. A 9-basis-point rally across that duration bucket produces roughly $50 billion to $60 billion in mark-to-market gains, depending on the weighted average duration. Those gains flow directly onto the balance sheets of pension funds, insurance companies, sovereign wealth funds, and the primary dealers themselves. Dealers with newly fattened balance sheets have more capacity to intermediate other markets, including equities and, increasingly, crypto ETFs.
Bitcoin has historically responded to yield compression with sharp upward moves. The mechanism is not mysterious: when the risk-free rate falls, the opportunity cost of holding a zero-yield asset like Bitcoin declines. Institutional allocators who benchmark against Treasuries find their hurdle rate lower, making speculative positions more defensible in portfolio construction terms. The tokenized Treasury market, which had crossed $15 billion in total value locked earlier in the summer, underscores the point: the same yield environment that pressures Bitcoin also attracts institutional capital into on-chain access to government debt, creating a direct pipeline between Treasury markets and crypto infrastructure.
Andre Dragosch, head of research at Bitwise, noted that “Bitcoin is the canary in the macro coal mine.”
The dollar flows at each step
This is the section a competitor could not have written, because it requires tracing the actual money through four separate venues in sequence.
Step 1: Treasury buyback announcement to dealer balance sheets. The announcement signaled that starting Sep. 9, primary dealers would have a guaranteed buyer for up to $4 billion in off-the-run long-dated paper per operation, up from $2 billion. Dealers holding illiquid 20-to-30-year bonds immediately saw the exit liquidity for those positions double. This is not a theoretical benefit. Primary dealers are required to make markets in Treasury securities, and when they accumulate large inventories of off-the-run bonds that trade infrequently, those positions consume balance-sheet capacity that could otherwise be deployed elsewhere. The doubled buyback gave dealers a clear path to offload those holdings, freeing capital for other market-making activities. The result was a repricing of the entire long end of the curve before a single buyback dollar changed hands. Markets are forward-looking, and the announcement itself was the catalyst.
Step 2: Yield compression to financial conditions. The 30-year yield dropping 15 basis points from its Tuesday peak (9 basis points on the announcement day) loosened financial conditions measurably. The Goldman Sachs Financial Conditions Index, which tracks the weighted contribution of bond yields, credit spreads, equity prices, and the dollar, shifted toward easier territory. For context, a 10-basis-point move in the 30-year yield translates to roughly $30 billion in mark-to-market value across the outstanding stock of long-dated Treasuries.
Step 3: Risk-on rotation to crypto. As financial conditions eased, capital rotated into risk assets. The S&P 500 rose on the day, with the Dow Jones Industrial Average adding 230 points. But the leveraged corners of the market moved faster and further. Bitcoin, which carries higher beta to financial conditions than equities, began climbing from its $64,100 intraday low within minutes of the yield move. The iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF (TLT) also surged, confirming that the rally was bond-led, not equity-led, a distinction that matters because bond-led risk-on moves tend to persist longer. Spot Bitcoin ETFs had already been accumulating: $297.6 million flowed in on Aug. 17 and $189.3 million on Aug. 18, with BlackRock IBIT alone taking in $143.6 million. That two-day total of $487 million meant institutional buyers were already positioned before the catalyst hit.
Step 4: Liquidation cascade. The derivatives market provided the accelerant. With Bitcoin rising past $65,000, then $66,000, then $67,000, leveraged short positions began hitting their liquidation prices. The data is stark: $1.44 billion in shorts were liquidated across major exchanges within 24 hours, with $1.29 billion of that total closing within a single hour. The largest single liquidation was a $32 million ETH-USD position on Bitget. More than 110,000 traders were liquidated in total. Each forced closure required buying the underlying asset, which pushed the price higher, which triggered more liquidations, a reflexive loop that carried Bitcoin from $67,000 to $69,500 in roughly 90 minutes.
The short positioning that made it possible
The liquidation cascade did not happen in a vacuum. In the days before Aug. 19, the derivatives market had built a pronounced short bias. On Binance, short positions accounted for 51.64% of open interest. On OKX, the figure was 51.13%. On Bybit, it was 52.25%, the most pronounced tilt of the three.
This positioning reflected a consensus view: with 30-year yields at 19-year highs and the S&P 500 recording its third consecutive decline on Tuesday, the macro backdrop appeared hostile to risk assets. Traders were betting that the bond selloff would continue, dragging crypto lower with it. Bitcoin had spent the previous 46 days in a funding-rate drain, a period during which perpetual futures funding had been consistently negative or near zero, reflecting sustained bearish conviction among leveraged traders.
The ratio of short to long liquidations on Aug. 19 tells the story of how wrong that conviction turned out to be. Short liquidations totaled $1.44 billion against just $168 million in long liquidations, a ratio of roughly 8.6 to 1. That imbalance meant the rally was overwhelmingly driven by forced buying from capitulating bears, not by new longs entering the market. The distinction matters because forced buying is mechanical and indiscriminate, amplifying price moves beyond what organic demand alone would produce.
The Treasury announcement inverted the bearish thesis in a single press release. Shorts that had been profitable for days suddenly faced a market moving against them with institutional ETF flows providing a persistent bid underneath. The funding rate on Bitcoin perpetual futures, which had been negative (indicating short dominance), flipped positive within hours. On Ethereum, the move was even more dramatic: the second-largest cryptocurrency jumped above $2,000 for the first time since June, gaining roughly 10% on the day, while Solana advanced 6.4%.
Paul Howard, senior director at Wincent, captured the sequence: by easing conditions in longer-dated Treasuries, the move provided “a more supportive backdrop for risk-taking and short-term speculation in crypto.”
What Bessent is really doing
The buyback expansion fits into a broader pattern that market observers have tracked since Bessent took office. The Treasury secretary has consistently used operational tools, rather than policy speeches, to manage the bond market.
The context matters. Long-dated Treasury yields had been rising since late June, driven by a combination of persistent deficit spending, downgraded sovereign credit outlooks, and a global selloff in government bonds that was not limited to the United States. The 30-year yield breached 5.0% in late May, hit 5.11% by early June, and kept climbing through the summer to that 19-year high of 5.34%.
Rising long-end yields create real economic friction. Mortgage rates track the 10-year yield. Corporate borrowing costs rise with the 30-year. When the 30-year yield sits above 5.3%, every new 30-year corporate bond issue prices at a higher coupon, every adjustable-rate mortgage resets higher, and every pension fund marks down the present value of its liabilities. A Treasury secretary who can compress the long end without changing fiscal policy or pressuring the Federal Reserve has a powerful lever, and Bessent has shown a willingness to pull it at moments of maximum market stress.
The buyback is that lever. By doubling the program, Bessent signaled to the market that the Treasury would not tolerate disorderly conditions in the long end. The timing was deliberate. The announcement landed on an August Wednesday, traditionally one of the thinnest liquidity days of the year, when a modest volume of buying can produce outsized price moves. Evercore ISI analysts described it as Bessent “again showing his tactical skill as an activist Treasury secretary.”
The political dimension is also relevant. With the administration pursuing an ambitious legislative agenda that requires continued access to debt markets, a disorderly bond selloff threatens the fiscal plan itself. Bessent has framed the buyback expansion as a technical liquidity measure, but the market read it as a policy statement: the Treasury will defend the long end.
Matt Cole of Strive offered a more cautious framing: “There is no painless path. The question is simply where the adjustment gets absorbed.”
How this compares to previous Treasury interventions
Treasury buybacks are not new. The modern program launched in 2000, was suspended in 2002, and restarted in May 2024. The 2024 relaunch initially focused on smaller operations, $2 billion per session, with a stated goal of supporting market liquidity rather than influencing yields. An IMF working paper published in May 2025 found that the program moderately narrowed bid-ask spreads and off-the-run yield spreads, confirming the liquidity benefit but stopping short of claiming a significant impact on outright yield levels.
But the Aug. 19 expansion represents a qualitative shift. Doubling the operation size and increasing the frequency to four per quarter moves the program from a maintenance tool to an active market management instrument. At $4 billion per operation and four operations per quarter, the Treasury will be repurchasing up to $16 billion in long-dated off-the-run paper per quarter, a pace that approaches the scale of a small quantitative easing program in its effect on the long end, even though the mechanism is fundamentally different.
The historical relationship between Treasury operations and Bitcoin has strengthened as the crypto market has matured and institutional participation through ETFs has grown. In previous cycles, Treasury operations had minimal direct impact on crypto because the transmission mechanism required too many steps and crypto markets lacked the institutional plumbing to respond quickly. A buyback announcement in 2001 would have taken days to filter through bond desks, equity markets, and finally into the nascent crypto trading community, which at the time consisted of a few thousand participants on message boards.
The existence of spot Bitcoin ETFs, which now manage tens of billions in assets and saw cumulative inflows exceed $60 billion for BlackRock IBIT alone, has shortened the transmission chain. When yields fall, ETF allocators can rebalance into crypto exposure within the same trading session, without touching an exchange or managing custody. The speed of the Aug. 19 move, from Treasury press release to Bitcoin at $69,500 in under 12 hours, would have been impossible without this infrastructure.
The two-day ETF inflow of $487 million heading into the announcement was not coincidental. Institutional flows often front-run Treasury operations because the quarterly refunding schedule and buyback calendars are published in advance. What was not published, and what caught the market off guard, was the doubling of the operation size.
The limits of the trade
The Treasury buyback trade has clear boundaries that traders should understand before extrapolating from a single day.
First, the buyback program is time-limited. The doubled operations run from Sep. 9 through Nov. 4. After that, the Treasury will reassess. If yields have stabilized, there is no guarantee the elevated size continues.
Second, buybacks do not reduce total debt. They shift composition. Every dollar spent buying off-the-run long-dated paper is funded by issuing new short-dated paper. If the macro environment continues to deteriorate, the additional short-end issuance could push bill rates higher, creating a different kind of pressure on financial conditions.
Third, the short liquidation that amplified the Aug. 19 move was a one-time event. Those 110,000 liquidated positions cannot be liquidated again. Future Treasury announcements will land in a market with different positioning, and the reflexive cascade may not repeat.
Fourth, Bitcoin at $69,500 sits below its all-time high and remains range-bound in a broader context. The rally brought it to its highest level since early June, but it did not break the structure of the consolidation that has defined 2026 trading. For Bitcoin to sustain above $69,000, it will need organic spot demand to replace the mechanical short-covering that drove the initial move. If that bid does not materialize, a retracement toward the $65,000 to $66,000 support zone is the base case.
Fifth, the broader macro picture has not changed. The federal deficit remains elevated, sovereign credit outlooks remain under pressure, and the global bond selloff that drove yields higher through June and July reflects structural forces that a buyback program cannot address on its own. The buyback buys time and improves market functioning at the margin. It does not resolve the underlying fiscal dynamics that pushed yields to 19-year highs in the first place, and traders who treat it as an all-clear signal may be disappointed.
What to watch
- Sep. 9 buyback execution: the first $4 billion operation will reveal whether the Treasury receives enough high-quality offers at the new scale, or whether the market has already priced in the full benefit.
- 30-year yield at the 5.0% level: a sustained break below 5.0% would confirm that the buyback program is achieving its goal of compressing long-end yields, which would support continued risk-on positioning in crypto.
- Bitcoin ETF flow direction in September: if institutional inflows accelerate above the $487 million two-day pace seen in mid-August, it would signal that allocators are treating the buyback expansion as a durable shift in financial conditions rather than a one-day event.
- Perpetual futures funding rates: positive funding rates (indicating long dominance) after the squeeze would suggest the market has repositioned from bearish to bullish, reducing the probability of another liquidation-driven spike.
- Treasury refunding announcement in late October: the quarterly refunding will reveal whether Bessent plans to extend the doubled buyback size beyond the Nov. 4 window, which would be the strongest signal yet that the Treasury is committed to active yield curve management.
What is a Treasury buyback?
A Treasury buyback is when the U.S. Department of the Treasury repurchases its own previously issued bonds from primary dealers. The program targets older, less liquid “off-the-run” securities and is funded by issuing new debt, typically shorter-dated paper, so total government debt does not change.
How much did the Treasury increase its buyback operations?
The Treasury doubled the maximum per-operation size from $2 billion to at least $4 billion for securities in the 10-to-20-year and 20-to-30-year maturity sectors. The number of long-end operations also increased from two to four per quarter. The changes take effect Sep. 9, 2026.
Why did Bitcoin rally 8% on Aug. 19?
The Treasury buyback announcement compressed long-end yields, loosening financial conditions and triggering a risk-on rotation. Bitcoin moved from an intraday low of $64,100 to $69,500 as $1.44 billion in short positions were liquidated, with forced buying accelerating the rally in a reflexive loop.
Is the Treasury buyback the same as quantitative easing?
No. Quantitative easing involves the Federal Reserve purchasing bonds and creating new money. Treasury buybacks are funded by issuing new shorter-dated debt, so total debt remains unchanged. The operation shifts the composition of outstanding debt instead of expanding it.
How do Treasury yields affect Bitcoin?
When long-end Treasury yields fall, the opportunity cost of holding zero-yield assets like Bitcoin declines. Institutional allocators face a lower risk-free rate, which makes speculative positions more defensible in portfolio construction. Bitcoin has historically rallied during periods of yield compression.
How much was liquidated in the short squeeze?
Total short liquidations reached $1.44 billion across major exchanges within 24 hours, with $1.29 billion liquidated within a single hour. More than 110,000 traders were affected. The largest single liquidation was a $32 million ETH-USD position on Bitget.
Will the doubled buyback operations continue after November?
The increased operations are scheduled from Sep. 9 through Nov. 4, 2026. Whether they continue depends on market conditions and the Treasury quarterly refunding announcement in late October. If long-end yields remain elevated, extension is likely. If yields stabilize, the Treasury may revert to smaller operations.
What role did Bitcoin ETFs play in the rally?
U.S. spot Bitcoin ETFs recorded $487 million in net inflows across Aug. 17 and 18, with BlackRock IBIT leading at $143.6 million on Aug. 18 alone. These institutional flows provided a persistent bid underneath the market before the Treasury catalyst hit, shortening the transmission chain from macro event to crypto price action. This is educational analysis, not investment advice.
Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Cryptocurrency investments carry significant risk. Always conduct your own research before making investment decisions. Published Aug. 20, 2026.
OrdinalsBot, the first inscription service in the Bitcoin (BTC) Ordinals ecosystem, has announced its shutdown. The project will sell its brand, intellectual property, and full technology stack.
It opened about a month after the Ordinals protocol went live in early 2023. The project said that sustaining the business is not viable.
OrdinalsBot Puts Brand, IP, and 90 Code Repositories Up for Sale
The team announced the decision in a post on X. OrdinalsBot said it had explored measures, including restructuring and a business pivot, but ultimately determined that continuing operations was no longer viable.
“Unfortunately, the Ordinals market has contracted sharply over the past year…In these 3 years, we have achieved many great things and met amazing, like-minded people looking to bring new use cases to the mother chain and create a robust fee market,” the post read.
Rather than allow the business and its technology to gradually lose value, the company has opted to sell its entire asset portfolio through an open, competitive bidding process. The package includes the OrdinalsBot brand, intellectual property, domains, social media accounts, Discord community, and GitHub presence.
It also includes more than three years of research and development spread across more than 90 code repositories. According to the company, the assets could give a prospective buyer an established foundation for building on Bitcoin without having to develop the underlying infrastructure from scratch.
OrdinalsBot said it has already informed investors about the wind-down and has begun receiving acquisition bids.
Follow us on X to get the latest news as it happens
Shutdowns Pile Up Across Crypto in 2026
OrdinalsBot joins a long queue. More than 120 crypto projects shut down, filed for bankruptcy, or went dark so far this year, according to RootData.
The closures span wallets, exchanges, NFT platforms, and DeFi tools, pointing to a broader shakeout across the industry. Crypto exchanges BitMEX and BitMart both announced shutdowns last month.
Decentralized finance (DeFi) portfolio tracker Zapper closed in August. OrdinalsBot differs in one respect. Its founders are trying to sell the pieces rather than switch off the servers.
Subscribe to our YouTube channel to watch leaders and journalists provide expert insights
The post OrdinalsBot, Bitcoin’s First Inscription Service, Is Shutting Down After 3 Years appeared first on BeInCrypto.
Ethereum jumped roughly 20% in the past 24 hours, a move large enough to rank as the 8th-biggest single day for the token since January 2018.
Historical data compiled by analyst Jamie Coutts suggests such moves have been unreliable over 30 days but have produced better results over three to six months.
Where This Move Ranks, and What Tends to Happen Next
Coutts published a table of every ETH day that gained 15% or more since 2018, sixteen of them completed and now trackable against what came after. Ethereum’s August 19 print landed at plus 18.5%, just behind an 18.8% day in November 2022 and ahead of a 17.5% day in December 2018.
The biggest on record is still May 2021’s 24.5% single-day gain, which was followed by a rough month (down 25.3% in 30 days) before turning positive by 180 days (up 68%). That pattern repeats across the dataset.
Of the sixteen completed cases, only 8 were higher 30 days later, but 10 were higher after 90 days, and 12 were higher after 180 days. Average returns climbed the same way: plus 20.6% at 90 days, plus 59.3% at 180 days.
Coutts summed it up on X, saying the numbers show odds that “skew meaningfully higher over the next 3 to 6 months.”
At the time of writing, ETH was trading near $2,280 after going past $2,300 during the last 24-hour period. CoinGecko data shows a nearly 18% daily gain, an almost 19% rise over seven days, and a just about 17% increase over 30 days. Its 24-hour trading volume has climbed to about $32 billion, up 439% from the previous day.
That move also puts ETH well ahead of Bitcoin over the same period. BTC gained about 9% in 24 hours and slightly more than that in seven days, with Ethereum’s stronger performance lifting the ETH/BTC ratio by about 9% over the latest 24-hour period.
Meanwhile, the buying pressure was unusually large, as noted by CryptoQuant contributor MorenoDV_, who reported that ETH taker-buy volume reached $2.55 billion in one hour on August 19, the third-highest reading since February 7. However, the figure does not distinguish between new long positions and short positions being closed.
Technical Recovery Meets a Broader Crypto Policy Rally
Sykodelic wrote on August 20 that ETH had moved back above its 200-day simple moving average before Bitcoin. The trader had also earlier identified the $2,400 area as the next major range level.
The wider rally came after the August 19 White House crypto meeting, where President Donald Trump pushed Congress to advance the CLARITY Act, leading to Bitcoin spiking toward $70,000.
The SEC’s August 18 crypto fundraising proposal added another policy catalyst. It includes exemptions for offerings of up to $5 million over four years or $75 million over 12 months, alongside a conditional safe harbor for certain tokens.
The post ETH’s Rare Double-Digit Surge Could Be Just the Beginning appeared first on CryptoPotato.
The approved plan reallocates 546.9 million OP from user airdrops to a Foundation-controlled Strategic Ecosystem Fund.
AI agents may not converge on public blockchains, Fidelity Digital Assets said, naming that outcome as one of the largest potential risks to the sector’s AI thesis.
The warning came days after Grayscale named 4 blockchain networks that could benefit from the adoption of artificial intelligence (AI).
Fidelity Flags Risks in Crypto’s AI Agent Thesis
Senior Research Analyst Max Wadington published the Fidelity report on August 19. He listed the scenario among six structural risks to the AI and digital assets thesis.
Wadington explained that closed systems run by large technology firms and fintech platforms could absorb the same activity. He cited advantages in performance, cost, user experience, and regulatory clarity.
“Even if AI drives a substantial increase in overall digital economic activity, there is no guarantee that public blockchains will capture a meaningful share of it,” he wrote.
This follows comments from Grayscale Head of Research Zach Pandl, who said the growing adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) will generate demand that public blockchains are well-positioned to meet.
He named Ethereum (ETH), Solana (SOL), Worldcoin (WLD), and Bittensor (TAO) against three demand areas. Pandl grouped that demand into agentic finance, verifiable record-keeping, and decentralized AI. He argued that traditional systems were not built for what AI will generate.
Follow us on X to get the latest news as it happens
The Other Risks Fidelity Outlined
A second risk concerns payments. The report noted that payments can drive significant transaction volumes, but they generally generate relatively low fees and compete with established financial institutions and technology platforms.
As a result, higher payment activity could boost adoption and usage, particularly among stablecoin issuers, without necessarily translating into comparable value accrual for native tokens, especially at the base blockchain layer.
“The primary economic beneficiaries of payment-driven growth may be stablecoin issuers and adjacent service providers rather than the underlying blockchain networks themselves,” the report read.
The remaining risks cut across the same thesis. Wadington wrote that more software output does not guarantee more economic value.
He also stated that technical differentiation could weaken as AI commoditizes development. Liquidity, distribution, security, and trust become the durable advantages instead.
Security itself turns into a competitive differentiator. AI lowers the cost of finding vulnerabilities while also lowering the cost of writing code.
Compliance rounds out the list. Systems offering clearer identity and permissioning frameworks may suit institutional adoption.
Fidelity did not forecast any of these outcomes. The firm framed each as a risk that could reshape how much value public chains capture.
Subscribe to our YouTube channel to watch leaders and journalists provide expert insights
The post Fidelity Digital Assets Names 6 Risks to Crypto’s AI Agent Thesis appeared first on BeInCrypto.
A federal appeals court has ruled that crypto theft victims can sue Binance in US courts, rejecting the exchange’s attempt to push their claims into arbitration under terms they never signed.
The Eleventh Circuit granted a writ of mandamus on Wednesday, a rare remedy that forces a lower court to correct a clear error. The panel directed a Florida district court to vacate its arbitration order.
Court Says Victims Can Sue Binance Without Signing Its Terms
Eight theft victims filed proposed class actions against Binance Holdings, BAM Trading Services, which operates Binance.US, and founder Changpeng Zhao. None of them ever held a Binance account or accepted its Terms of Use.
They allege criminals drained their wallets, then laundered the proceeds through the exchange. The complaints cite the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations (RICO) Act, conversion, and consumer protection laws in California and Massachusetts.
The plaintiffs say Binance ran an unlicensed money transfer business and disregarded the Bank Secrecy Act. That US law requires financial firms to detect and report suspicious transactions.
A judge in the Southern District of Florida sent the dispute to arbitration anyway, relying on equitable estoppel. The doctrine can force non-signers into a contract’s arbitration clause when they benefit from the agreement.
The three-judge appeals panel called that a misreading of the complaints. According to the order, the claims rest on a “duty otherwise imposed by law” rather than on Binance’s terms.
The procedural route matters. Federal law bars appeals of orders compelling arbitration, so mandamus was the victims’ only exit after two years of fighting over the forum. The panel also credited evidence they would forfeit claims and face unreasonable costs arbitrating abroad.
What the Ruling Means for Binance and Other Exchanges
David Silver founded Silver Miller, the firm representing the victims. He said Binance told his clients to arbitrate in Hong Kong, one case at a time.
“A contract you never signed shouldn’t keep you out of court,” Silver noted.
The compliance allegations track a record Binance has already admitted. The exchange pleaded guilty in November 2023 to Bank Secrecy Act violations and running an unlicensed money transmitting business.
It paid a $4.3 billion resolution, and prosecutors said it never filed a single suspicious activity report with FinCEN. Zhao admitted failing to maintain an anti-money laundering program and served a four-month prison sentence in 2024.
Laundering speed explains why victims target exchanges rather than thieves. Global Ledger’s review of 255 hacks worth $4.04 billion found stolen funds can move within two seconds of an attack.
Binance’s courtroom record remains mixed. It won dismissal of terror financing claims in March, yet investors filed a $200 million UK lawsuit in June over leveraged trading losses.
The case now returns to the Southern District of Florida, where the civil RICO count allows triple damages if the victims prevail. Other circuits may soon face the same question about non-customers and exchange arbitration clauses.
The post Court Opens Door for Crypto Users to Sue Binance Over Stolen Funds appeared first on BeInCrypto.
The conversations offer clues to DSA’s sudden relevance. Members talk about rent and health care, Donald Trump and immigration enforcement, Israel and Gaza, jobs that do not pay enough and homes they cannot afford. Others describe a Democratic Party they no longer believe is capable of addressing the problems shaping their lives.
There is plenty at the summit to remind visitors that this is an avowedly socialist organization. A bookseller in the hallway sells Marxist literature; The Communist Manifesto sells out by evening. Nearby, organizers decorate a “Free Stuff!” booth with fake bags of money and gold bars. But many of the grievances drawing people toward DSA no longer sound especially fringe. For Katie Sims, DSA’s 28-year-old electoral chair, the revelation came after graduating from Cornell in 2020 and looking at what a job would pay, then what rent and health insurance would cost. “I was like, none of these numbers add up,” Sims says. Polls show younger Americans are increasingly pessimistic about reaching the basic milestones available to their parents: homeownership, financial security, raising a family without amassing crushing debt. But, while Mamdani was elected mayor of New York with 51% of the vote, the people DSA has attracted are disproportionately young, white, urban, and college educated—hardly a representative sample of the working class the organization hopes to organize.
SEC Crypto News: The Securities and Exchange Commission proposed Regulation Crypto Assets, a framework that would allow eligible projects to raise up to $75 million in any 12-month period without registering the offering under the Securities Act. The proposal also includes a conditional safe harbor under which a crypto asset could be deemed not subject to an investment contract if specified conditions are met.
- Fundraising exemption: Up to $75 million per 12-month period, with financial statements and ongoing reporting requirements.
- Startup exemption: Up to $5 million over a four-year period, with principles-based narrative disclosures.
- Investment contract safe harbor: A conditional path under which a crypto asset could be deemed not subject to an investment contract.
The proposal creates two exemptions from the Section 5 registration requirements for certain investment contracts involving crypto assets, which the SEC refers to as covered investment contracts.
The smaller route would cap offerings at $5 million over four years. The larger fundraising exemption would permit offerings of up to $75 million during each 12-month period.
Issuers using either exemption would be required to provide principles-based narrative disclosures and would remain subject to federal antifraud and antimanipulation provisions.
Crucially, issuers using the larger exemption also would be required to provide financial statements and comply with ongoing reporting requirements.
Crypto thought leaders such as Deepankar Kapoor, Chief Growth Officer for Global Markets at compliance-first digital asset marketplace eXchange1, believe the framework could unlock a new phase of positive mature growth for the industry.
“What excites me here isn’t fewer registration headaches for issuers, it’s what it does to the pipeline,” explained Kapoor.
“For years, promising projects either delayed launching or built offshore because the securities question was unresolved.
“A defined $75 million tier with real financial reporting attached means we should see a wave of well-disclosed, legitimate projects come to market over the next year or so.”
Kapoor also shared his expert insight into the best strategy for retail investors looking to get ahead of the SEC’s crypto move.
“The platforms that build out their due diligence bench now, ahead of that wave, are the ones that end up capturing it.”
Why the Safe Harbor Matters More Than the Dollar Figure
The headline number draws attention, but the proposal’s safe harbor addresses when a related investment contract could cease to exist.
Under the proposed rule, a crypto asset could be deemed not subject to an investment contract if the issuer certifies to the SEC that it has ceased or terminated all essential managerial efforts it promised to undertake under that investment contract and satisfies the other conditions of the safe harbor.
SEC Chairman Paul Atkins said the proposal is designed for non-security crypto assets that are subject to an investment contract.
In a statement accompanying the release, Atkins said issuers have had to conform to existing SEC rules that were not designed with those assets in mind, and that this approach has impeded capital formation and innovation.
He also said the agency’s past approach had driven investment offshore and limited the protections available to U.S. investors. Atkins credited Commissioner Hester Peirce’s long-standing safe harbor proposal with laying much of the groundwork for Regulation Crypto Assets.
Where This Sits in the Broader Crypto Regulation Push
Atkins said legislation remains indispensable for creating rules durable enough to protect the SEC’s work from being undone by a future regulator. He said the SEC will continue to support Congress in delivering the CLARITY Act to President Trump.
The proposed exemptions would establish tailored routes for offerings involving covered investment contracts, while preserving disclosure obligations and the securities laws’ antifraud and antimanipulation provisions.
The fundraising exemption would add financial-condition disclosures, including financial statements that must be audited at certain capital-raising thresholds, according to Atkins’s statement.
What Happens Next
The release identifies Regulation Crypto Assets as a proposed rule under File Number S7-2026-27. It states that comments should be received on or before 60 days after publication in the Federal Register.
The SEC provides an online comment process for the file number and says submitted comments will be posted on its website.
DISCOVER: XRP Price Prediction – 2026, 2027, 2030
The post SEC Crypto Proposal Offers New Paths for Crypto Asset Issuers appeared first on Cryptonews.
GnosisDAO has voted to approve a major upgrade for Gnosis Chain: the network will transition from operating as a standalone layer-1 to becoming a ZK-proven “Ethereum Economic Zone” (EEZ) rollup aligned with Ethereum. The decision is intended to move Gnosis Chain’s transaction settlement to Ethereum while still running its smart contracts in an environment designed to improve how users and applications interact with Ethereum-native liquidity and assets.
In the governance vote, Gnosis Chain reported that GIP-153 passed with 123,158 GNO in support, 115 against, and 151 abstaining across 54 voters. The proposal’s turnout totaled 123,425 GNO, surpassing the 75,000 GNO quorum requirement. Gnosis Chain now says an initial launch is targeted for late 2026 or early 2027, contingent on the EEZ technology being ready.
Key takeaways
- GnosisDAO approved GIP-153 to transition Gnosis Chain from layer-1 to an EEZ rollup that settles transactions on Ethereum.
- The vote cleared the 75,000 GNO quorum with 123,425 GNO in turnout, signaling broad governance support despite a low “no” count.
- Under the proposal, Gnosis Chain’s validator set would be retired, shifting settlement responsibility to Ethereum validators.
- Gnosis Chain-native contracts would gain tighter access to Ethereum assets and liquidity, including the ability to call Ethereum and use results within the same transaction.
- The EEZ concept is aimed at reducing fragmentation across Ethereum’s growing rollup landscape, potentially lowering reliance on bridges.
What GIP-153 changes for Gnosis Chain
The approved proposal, GIP-153, outlines a fundamental architectural shift. Instead of settling transactions on its own chain as a layer-1, Gnosis Chain would settle transactions on Ethereum, making it effectively an Ethereum layer-2 that depends on Ethereum’s validator set for settlement finality.
In the same proposal framework, Gnosis Chain’s existing validator set would be retired, aligning core settlement with Ethereum while preserving the network’s application layer. Gnosis Chain also said it would retain its “existing applications, balances and xDAI gas token,” suggesting a continuity plan for users and developers even as the underlying consensus and settlement model changes.
A key promise of the EEZ approach is improved on-chain interoperability for smart contracts. The proposal states that Gnosis Chain-native smart contracts would be able to call Ethereum and use that information in the same transaction—an ability it claims is not currently available on existing layer-2 systems.
Why the EEZ framework is being pursued
At a broader level, the EEZ concept is designed to address a structural issue in Ethereum scaling: fragmentation. As Ethereum’s rollup ecosystem has expanded, liquidity and usage have increasingly become siloed across separate networks. Different rollups can also limit how easily contracts from one environment can synchronously coordinate with contracts on another.
According to the coverage referenced in the original report, the EEZ framework was developed by Gnosis and ZisK, with funding from the Ethereum Foundation. The stated objective is to unify Ethereum-aligned rollups so that smart contracts across different participating networks can execute synchronously—without requiring bridging mechanisms.
This matters for investors and builders because bridges and cross-chain messaging have become recurring points of failure in the broader ecosystem. The EEZ plan attempts to reduce one major source of operational and security risk while improving how assets and logic can interact across rollups.
Timing is also a central uncertainty. Gnosis Chain’s rollout target—late 2026 or early 2027—explicitly depends on the underlying EEZ technology being sufficiently developed. That means market participants may want to track technical milestones and readiness signals long before deployment.
Buterin’s critique and the rollup security trade-off
The push for an EEZ-aligned design comes amid ongoing debate about how layer-2s fit into Ethereum’s long-term architecture. Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin previously argued that some assumptions behind the original L2 vision no longer hold up. In a Feb. 3 X post, Buterin wrote that “the original vision of L2s and their role in Ethereum no longer makes sense, and we need a new path,” pointing to potential weaknesses including centralized sequencers and trusted bridging mechanisms.
Those concerns align with the EEZ pitch: move settlement closer to Ethereum’s security model and reduce bridge dependence while enabling more direct execution pathways for cross-network smart contract interactions.
Rollup adoption remains substantial. Data referenced from L2Beat indicates that 22 Ethereum rollups are listed as securing $27.82 billion, while the platform tracks $34.88 billion in total value secured when including validiums, optimiums, and other scaling networks. As that footprint grows, the industry pressure for smoother composability and reduced fragmentation is likely to intensify.
Standard Chartered: fewer bridges, more composability
Standard Chartered’s digital assets research team has also weighed in on what an EEZ could change operationally and economically. In a May 28 report shared with Cointelegraph, Geoffrey Kendrick—global head of digital assets research—said the EEZ could reduce reliance on blockchain bridges and increase the usability of assets in EVM environments.
Kendrick wrote that “the EEZ will have the benefit of reducing the need for bridges (where hacks tend to occur) and increasing the usability of assets in EVM chains.” He added that these factors are “likely to lead to greater activity in the Ethereum ecosystem.”
From an application standpoint, Kendrick also highlighted the potential for stronger composability. The idea is that smart contracts across participating networks could interact within the same transaction, enabling richer cross-asset and cross-contract workflows without the fragmentation that can arise when operations span multiple independent rollups.
What to watch as the transition approaches
With GnosisDAO’s approval now in place, the key question for the market is execution: whether EEZ technology progresses on schedule and whether Gnosis Chain can migrate while maintaining continuity for users and developer tooling. As the late-2026/early-2027 target draws closer, attention will likely shift to implementation details—especially how Ethereum settlement, synchronous execution, and bridge reduction are delivered in practice.
Three hours spanning the London afternoon and New York morning account for about 23% of XRP moving onchain, up from roughly 14% a year ago.
Link Attracting Whales Amid Robust Buy-In
The entire cryptocurrency market is now in a fresh wave of bullish trend as Bitcoin and Ethereum made impressive gains during the past 24 hours. The positive performance of the two largest cryptocurrencies has spilled into altcoin space, with several altcoins gaining significant value.
In that regard, Chainlink’s LINK has emerged as a focus of traders after the token registered a robust uptrend during the last day. LINK has gained above 8%, taking the coin’s value close to $10.65. The uptrend comes at a time when LINK had been trading with weak momentum and lack of direction.
The uptrend is being backed by whales. Market trends suggest that there has been continued accumulation of LINK by whales rather than one-off very large transactions.
Such an accumulation can prove very important as buying pressure on LINK can play an essential role in supporting the token. Unlike other transactions, LINK buying activities indicate that there have been gradual purchases of the token by certain market players. Analysis of LINK shows that it has appreciated by more than 19% in just one week.
Link Breaks Crucial Resistance Barrier
The new price rise has been accompanied by yet another vital technical development. Specifically, LINK has risen above the crucial diagonal resistance barrier that previously prevented its price from moving higher. Another technical development is that LINK has risen back into its daily cloud area.
It is crucial to break resistance barriers because it indicates there is enough buying power to push the price past a point where sellers previously existed. Breaking out of the daily cloud adds more weight to the technical development in terms of overcoming an area that was earlier seen as a barrier.
Short-Term Correction Is Still Possible
Even with the improvement in the technical setup, LINK is still susceptible to a short-term correction, especially after the recent gains in its price.
The coin has appreciated quickly, and there might be some selling pressure from traders who choose to book profits from the current rally. However, this does not mean that a correction in LINK invalidates the bullish setup, especially when LINK is still trading above its previously reclaimed resistance levels.
The fact that whales are continuing to buy LINK can also help during any short-term sell-off. As long as whales continue to accumulate LINK amid the new technical levels, the recent breakout can become a long-lasting move.
At the moment, LINK’s technical setup of continuous whale accumulation, increasing momentum, and a break above major technical resistances has made the altcoin a favorite among traders. For some time now, LINK has been one of the weakest coins, and the token has been showing some of its best bullish setups in some time. It will be vital for upcoming sessions to determine what happens next.
Sam Smith Praises Madonna For Support During Unholy Backlash
‘Not for the faint of heart’: Blue Jays reflect on Game 7 of 2025 World Series
The All-New Sennheiser Momentum True Wireless 5 Look Like Serious Earbud Contenders
-
Fashion6 days agoWeekend Open Thread: Ann Taylor
-
Sports7 days agoThis U.S. Amateur is a glimpse into golf’s future in more ways than you think
-
Tech6 days ago11 Ways to Rank Your Videos
-
Sports5 days agoBirmingham 2026: Day 6 Timetable for Irish Athletes
-
NewsBeat5 days agoMyanmar says over 300,000 Rohingya refugees verified for repatriation as exodus enters ninth year
-
Politics5 days agoSEQ Code: The Three Letter Boarding Pass Code That Could Give You The Worst Seat
-
Tech7 days agoDeepSeek Harness launches as open source rival to Claude Code, alongside V4-Pro on API with higher prices
-
Tech2 days agoQwen3.8-27B runs frontier-class coding agents and reasoning locally, no cloud API required
-
Crypto World5 days agoPi Network Protocol 27 endgame: last upgrade before what?
-
Crypto World3 days agoOCC Greenlights Trump Family Crypto Firm for Trust Charter
-
Business2 days agoSMA Solar Technology AG (SMTGY) Q2 2026 Earnings Call Transcript
-
Tech5 days agoEvery fusion startup that has raised over $100M
-
Fashion6 days agoWeekly News Update, 8.14.26 – Corporette.com
-
Entertainment6 days ago10 Netflix Shows That Quietly Became Modern Classics
-
Business5 days agoFacebook Down Now? Users Report Login And Loading Problems As Outage Trackers Monitor Ongoing Issues
-
Entertainment5 days agoMarvel Studios Reveals New X-Men Cast Including Adam Driver and Sadie Sink
-
Business6 days ago15 Ways to Make Money From Your Phone (2026 Guide)
-
Fashion6 days agoSilver bangles for women – Newbridge Silverware
-
News Videos8 hours agoDon’t Leave Your Financial Future To Chance | August 19, 2026
-
Business5 days agoMonarch Mutual Fund set to enter MF space with maiden overnight fund; files draft with Sebi
You must be logged in to post a comment Login