Crypto World
How Bitcoin Could Reuse Signatures Across Compatible UTXOs
This is Part 3 in the technical article series about Bitcoin covenants by Cointelegraph Research. To read the previous article click here.
SIGHASH_ANYPREVOUT, as proposed in BIP 118, builds on the earlier SIGHASH_NOINPUT concept mentioned in the 2015 Lightning Network paper by Joseph Poon and Thaddeus Dryja, and later formally proposed by Joseph Poon on the bitcoin-dev mailing list in February 2016.
SIGHASH_ANYPREVOUT is not a new opcode but a proposed new value for the SIGHASH flag, designed to be deployed as a soft-fork upgrade to Bitcoin. The SIGHASH flag is appended to a signature and determines which parts of a transaction are signed and will be checked by the CHECKSIG opcode. The selected flag is chosen by the signer, not enforced by the scriptPubKey. Due to the technical details related to upgradability in a softfork, the SIGHASH_ANYPREVOUT proposal only extends to spends from taproot addresses.
A variety of standard SIGHASH modes already exist, as illustrated in Figure 1. If the flag is set to SIGHASH_ALL, the signature must cover all inputs, all outputs, and the specific outpoint being spent, thus cryptographically binding the authorization to that exact UTXO. An outpoint is the combination of a transaction ID and an output index that together uniquely identify which UTXO a transaction is consuming. With SIGHASH_NONE, only the inputs need to be signed, leaving the outputs unconstrained. The SIGHASH_SINGLE variant signs all inputs, but only the output at the same index as the input being signed. The ANYONECANPAY modifier introduces further flexibility by allowing a single input to be signed independently of the others. Crucially, none of these existing modes allows a signature to omit commitment to the outpoint. That restriction is what SIGHASH_ANYPREVOUT removes.
BIP-118 defines two ANYPREVOUT variants that differ in how much of the previous output they omit from the digest, summarised in Figure 2. Under SIGHASH_ANYPREVOUT, the outpoint is excluded from the digest, but the signature still commits to the amount and scriptPubKey of the previous output, as well as the input’s nSequence. Under SIGHASH_ANYPREVOUTANYSCRIPT, the amount and scriptPubKey are also excluded, meaning the signature is not bound to the locking script of the spent output at all. All other commitments follow the standard Taproot signature message construction and depend on the selected base flag, such as SIGHASH_ALL or SIGHASH_SINGLE.
Because the outpoint is omitted from the digest, the same signature can authorize spending any compatible UTXO that satisfies the remaining committed fields. For example, a transaction pre-signed with ANYPREVOUT | ALL to produce a 0.5 BTC output can be reused if the same address later receives another UTXO of 0.5 BTC, even if the private key used to create the original signature is no longer available. If the new UTXO holds more than 0.5 BTC, however, the excess will be lost to miners unless the original signature included a change output. This rebinding property is what makes ANYPREVOUT useful for layer-2 protocols, where the same pre-signed transaction must apply to multiple possible on-chain UTXOs without requiring new signatures for each one.
For covenant-like applications, the ANYPREVOUT variants preserve commitment to the scriptPubKey of the previous output, and are typically the most relevant. They allow signatures to be reused across compatible UTXOs while ensuring funds remain bound to the same locking script. ANYPREVOUTANYSCRIPT removes this binding entirely and is therefore less suited to covenant-style applications.
Similar to OP_CTV, SIGHASH_ANYPREVOUT improves on the logic already achievable with pre-signed transactions but does not by itself enable recursive covenants or transaction introspection. Instead, it relaxes the binding between a signature and a specific UTXO, allowing a signature to be reused across multiple compatible UTXOs.
Some research has also noted that removing the outpoint commitment makes recovered-key constructions possible — that is, a public key can be derived from a fixed signature and message pair such that the corresponding private key is provably unknown to anyone, making the UTXO’s key path provably unspendable and forcing any spend through the script path. It would avoid the need for temporary keys, which are otherwise required to make the key path unspendable in constructions that rely on script-path-only enforcement. This observation appears in Bitcoin Covenants: Three Ways to Control the Future by Jacob Swambo et al. (2020), although it remains a theoretical construction rather than a design proposed in BIP-118.
The primary risk associated with SIGHASH_ANYPREVOUT signatures is signature replay. Because these signatures do not commit to a specific outpoint, the same signature can be used to spend a different UTXO than the one originally intended, provided the new UTXO satisfies the remaining committed fields. This risk becomes more pronounced in specific configurations: when ANYPREVOUT | SINGLE is used and output amounts can be rearranged; when a separate UTXO exists with the same scriptPubKey and amount, in the case of ANYPREVOUT; when the same public key appears in a compatible script, in the case of ANYPREVOUTANYSCRIPT; or when a miner can influence transaction ordering and inclusion to exploit these conditions. However, these scenarios require either deliberate misuse or a failure of the user or developer to account for replay conditions during protocol design.
In our next article we will commence our discussion of Opcodes that serve as supporting tools. These extend the expressiveness of Bitcoin script or data handling but do not implement covenant functionality unless combined with other opcodes. In this next category, we will discuss OP_CHECKSIGFROMSTACK and OP_CAT.
Bitcoin and the broader cryptocurrency market came under pressure Tuesday after the US and Iran exchanged aerial strikes, sending the dollar higher.
BTC, the leading cryptocurrency by market capitalization, slipped to $62,657 in Asian trading hours, down nearly 1% since midnight UTC, according to CoinDesk data. Ether (ETH), XRP (XRP), and solana (SOL) fell between 1% and 2.3%. WTI crude futures jumped more than 2% to $72.27, while the Dollar Index held steady above 101.00, maintaining Tuesday’s gains.
The U.S. said it launched “powerful strikes” against Iran following attacks on three ships in the Strait of Hormuz, including Qatari and Saudi tankers. In response, Iran said it targeted “85 US military installations” in retaliation for strikes on its Hormozgan and Mahshahr provinces.
The scale of the escalation appears to have pushed the two nations’ ceasefire to the brink of collapse.
The Iran war erupted in late February, pushing oil prices well above $100 per barrel and generating a massive inflationary shock worldwide. While prices have since crashed back below $60, inflation expectations among consumers have continued to rise, fueling fears of interest rate hikes across the world, including in the US.
Higher rates make it more difficult for traders to abandon yields from supposedly safe bonds in favor of higher-risk assets such as cryptocurrencies.
Strike, the Bitcoin financial services firm led by Jack Mallers, has introduced a new “volatility-proof” Bitcoin-backed loan designed to reduce the risk of margin calls and forced liquidations during sharp market drops. The trade-off is cost and scheduling discipline: the program carries a higher interest rate, a shorter loan term, and an expectation that borrowers make payments on time.
In a Tuesday announcement, Mallers said the product was built in response to customer feedback on Strike’s earlier Bitcoin loan offering launched in May 2025—an initial rollout that coincided with a severe drawdown. During that period, Bitcoin fell 54% from peak to trough, and many borrowers were liquidated.
Key takeaways
- Strike’s new loans aim to remove margin calls and price-triggered liquidations, limiting forced selling during downturns.
- The mechanism requires borrowers to stay current; missed payments can still lead Strike to sell collateral.
- Terms are shorter than Strike’s standard product and the interest rate is higher—up to an APR range around 10.7% to 14.2% based on Strike’s disclosed structure.
- The maximum initial loan-to-value ratio is 45%, which lowers borrowing capacity relative to the collateral posted.
A product aimed at breaking the “volatility-to-liquidation” link
In his remarks, Mallers summarized the core design goal: “No margin calls. No price liquidations. No matter how far bitcoin falls, your bitcoin doesn’t move.” He emphasized that the protection comes with conditions—namely paying on time and accepting a higher cost and shorter term than Strike’s standard loans.
Strike’s pitch matters because the industry has spent years trying to broaden Bitcoin’s utility beyond holding and transfers. Yet adoption of crypto-backed lending has lagged, largely due to uncertainty around how quickly collateral can be liquidated when markets move. A June report from crypto lending platform Ledn—referenced in the announcement—found that 88% of surveyed crypto investors would consider crypto-backed loans, but only 14% actually use them, citing a “crypto collateral gap” driven by volatility and confidence issues.
Volatility has been a persistent challenge for Bitcoin loans. Mallers pointed out that Bitcoin has fallen by 30% or more in 10 of the past 12 years, and that drawdowns of 50% or more have occurred four times since 2014. The new loan structure attempts to address a key behavioral and structural concern: that borrowers can be forced to sell when prices drop, even if they would be able to manage debt payments under a different risk framework.
How Strike’s “volatility-proof” structure changes borrowing terms
According to Strike’s details, the volatility-proof loans have a maximum initial loan-to-value ratio of 45%. That means a borrower posting $100,000 in Bitcoin could borrow up to $45,000 under this framework. Strike also disclosed that the APR is meaningfully higher than for its standard Bitcoin loan product, with an additional charge intended to support extra hedging designed to protect the system.
Strike’s standard Bitcoin loans carry an annual percentage rate between 7.75% and 11.25%. The new product is described as 2.95 percentage points higher than the standard offering, putting the volatility-proof APR roughly in the 10.7% to 14.2% range. Mallers characterized the approach as an exchange: “If you’re OK with a slightly shorter term and a little bit higher of a fee, there is no price move that can liquidate you.”
The company also pointed to Bitcoin’s recent market backdrop to frame why the change was necessary. Over the past year, Bitcoin has dropped 54% from its all-time high of $126,080 in October to $58,190 on June 25, according to the figures cited in the announcement.
Other market participants highlighted the product’s potential benefit while still acknowledging the cost. Investor Fred Krueger, responding on X, said the loan model could address “one of Bitcoin’s biggest structural problems: forced selling during market crashes,” arguing that defaults would be tied more to borrowers’ ability to service debt rather than temporary price swings. Vibes Capital Management executive chairman Rob Topping also welcomed the liquidity angle for users who want near-term cash without liquidation risk, while calling the 14% APR expensive.
Payments still matter: the rules shift from price risk to default risk
Strike’s volatility-proof label is not absolute. The company’s approach redirects risk away from price-based liquidations and toward payment behavior. Mallers said that if a borrower misses a payment, they have 10 days to catch up or contact Strike to explain their financial situation.
If Strike does not hear from the borrower after that 10-day period, the company may begin liquidating the borrower’s Bitcoin collateral to cover the overdue amount. Mallers underscored this distinction by stating that the product is designed to be “volatility-proof,” not “liquidation-proof,” adding that if clients appear to be “doing a hit-and-run,” Strike may have to sell some collateral.
The loans are available in most U.S. states and can be taken out under both personal and business names. Strike’s disclosed minimums vary by state and by loan type, with personal loans offered from $10,000 and certain business loans available as low as $5,000. The company said the proceeds can be used for new borrowing, refinancing, or consolidating existing obligations.
Where this fits in a wider lending market
Strike is not alone in offering Bitcoin-backed loans; other participants mentioned alongside Strike include Binance, Coinbase, Nexo, and Xapo Bank. However, the central question for borrowers remains the same across providers: how to access liquidity without being forced to sell during sharp market declines.
By setting a lower maximum loan-to-value ratio (45%) and charging a higher APR to fund additional hedging, Strike is attempting to engineer a path where collateral value volatility does not automatically translate into liquidation. For investors and traders, this shift could be meaningful in managing cash-flow stress—especially during periods where paying down debt remains feasible, but the collateral drawdown would otherwise trigger margin calls.
Borrowers considering the new program should watch two things going forward: how consistently Strike enforces the payment schedule across cases, and whether the company’s higher APR and tighter loan framework materially improve outcomes relative to its first loan product during prolonged volatility. The effectiveness of a volatility-proof model ultimately depends on how well it balances hedging costs with real-world borrower repayment behavior.
SpaceX’s price targets now span a massive range. Wall Street analysts set targets from $131 to $800 as the IPO quiet period ended.
Nineteen analysts published new ratings once the quiet period lifted for 23 underwriting banks behind SpaceX’s IPO. The moves coincided with SpaceX’s inclusion in the Nasdaq-100 index on Tuesday, July 7. The median target sits at around $250, a 56% jump from Monday’s closing price.
The High End of the Range
Raymond James analyst Brian Gesuale set the Street-high target at $800. He compared SpaceX to railroads and the internet as foundational infrastructure.
Citi’s John Godyn rated the stock a buy at $200. He called it a step toward a longer-term $900 target tied to Starship.
Deutsche Bank’s Edison Yu and J.P. Morgan’s Doug Anmuth issued buy-equivalent ratings at $255 and $225. Morgan Stanley’s Adam Jonas set a $300 base case. His range spans a $600 bull case and a $75 bear case.
Fourteen of the 19 targets clustered between $200 and $250. That optimism follows heavy institutional demand. BlackRock placed a $5 billion order ahead of the company’s $2 trillion debut last month.
The Low End of the Range
MoffettNathanson’s Julie Zhu set the Street-low target at $131, the sole holdout with a neutral rating that implies 18% downside. The firm called SpaceX’s $30 trillion addressable market estimate “absurd.” It also questioned Musk’s plan to deploy 100 gigawatts of orbital compute by 2029.
“There is simply no credible financial model that can support what is at the time of this writing a roughly $2 trillion valuation. Our own certainly does not.”
Zhu’s team stopped short of a sell rating. The analysts argue investors are pricing SpaceX as an option on businesses that don’t exist yet. It flagged regulatory scrutiny of SpaceX’s launch dominance as the bigger long-term risk. That risk remains years away, the firm said.
The nearly $700 gap between the highest and lowest targets leaves SpaceX’s volatile stock at a crossroads. Starship’s next test this month could sway which camp proves right.
The post SpaceX Price Predicted to Range Between $131 and $800. Where Will SPCX Land? appeared first on BeInCrypto.
The market capitalization of compliant euro stablecoins grew 128% in the year leading up to the end of the Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation (MiCA) transition period, according to payments infrastructure firm Decta.
Decta said in a Sunday report that the combined market cap of eight MiCA-compliant euro stablecoins rose to $673.9 million on June 28, 2026, from $295.6 million on June 30, 2025. Trading volume rose 43.1% to $67.3 million from $47 million. The number of MiCA-compliant euro stablecoins tracked in the report also rose to eight from five over the period.
Decta tracked eight euro stablecoins that were actively issuing tokens and had market capitalization and trading volume during the study period. By contrast, the European Securities and Markets Authority interim MiCA register lists a broader set, including tokens that may not meet Decta’s activity criteria.
The report found that euro-denominated stablecoins are growing under MiCA but from a small base in a market still dominated by dollar-backed tokens. CoinGecko data shows US dollar-pegged stablecoins at about $300 billion in market capitalization. The combined market capitalization of Decta’s eight actively traded, MiCA-compliant euro stablecoins was 0.22% of the dollar stablecoin market.
From July 1, firms offering crypto-asset services in the European Union generally needed MiCA authorization. Decta’s data sample ends days before the close of MiCA’s crypto-asset service provider (CASP) transition period.
Market capitalization of the top eight euro-pegged stablecoins. Source: Decta
Euro stablecoin growth amid MiCA competitiveness debate
The report adds to a debate among policymakers and industry groups over whether MiCA’s stricter stablecoin rules are helping the euro ecosystem grow or limiting its competitiveness against dollar-backed tokens.
On April 27, a Blockchain for Europe report argued that MiCA had made euro stablecoins safer but commercially weaker. The report said MiCA’s reserve requirements and ban on interest payments left euro tokens at a disadvantage.
Related: EU crypto rulebook faces enforcement challenge as MiCA transition ends
The debate intensified in May after a policy paper from Brussels-based think tank Bruegel called for easing liquidity requirements for stablecoin issuers and potentially granting them access to European Central Bank funding. The paper argued that looser rules could help the euro stablecoin market compete with dollar-backed tokens.
However, the European Central Bank (ECB) pushed back. On May 23, the ECB warned EU finance ministers that expanding issuance of euro stablecoins could weaken bank lending and complicate monetary policy. The ECB also dismissed concerns that stricter EU rules would accelerate digital dollarization.
Magazine: Bitcoin slides to $58K, XRP hits $1 but onchain data promising: Market Moves
Bitcoin (BTC) has further to fall for one of its “cleanest cycle clocks” to signal a bear-market bottom, new analysis says.
Key points:
- One of Bitcoin’s “cleanest cycle clocks” suggests that new macro lows are needed this bear market.
- The NUPL metric is still in positive territory, setting it apart from previous bear markets.
- Analysis expects history to repeat with a higher low on a long-term NUPL moving average.
CryptoQuant: Bitcoin NUPL contains “level to watch”
In research published on Monday, onchain analytics platform CryptoQuant flagged an incoming profitability floor for the BTC supply.
The onchain metric involved was Net Unrealized Profit/Loss (NUPL), which measures the portion of the supply being held at a higher or lower price versus that at which it last moved. Its score is currently 0.158, a level last seen in early 2023.
“Smoothed into its 30 and 100-day exponential moving averages (EMAs), it becomes one of the cleanest cycle clocks on-chain,” contributor TheChessOnChain commented.
An accompanying chart shows the 100-day EMA of NUPL slowly trending toward cycle bottom levels below zero.
“Every time the 100-day EMA of NUPL fell below zero, Bitcoin was carving its cycle bottom: late 2011 (low near $2), January 2015 ($182), the 2018 bear ($3,206 in December 2018), and the 2022 FTX bottom ($15,792 in November 2022),” TheChessOnChain noted.
Bitcoin NUPL data (screenshot). Source: CryptoQuant
At just above $60,000, BTC/USD corresponds to an NUPL 100-day EMA of 0.215, signalling plenty of room left to drop in order to match previous bear-market lows.
CryptoQuant acknowledged that NUPL has put in higher lows throughout Bitcoin’s history, meaning that even a trip below the zero line may not be essential.
“That leaves two paths,” it continued, describing the four extant zero-line crosses as a “pattern, not a law.”
“Either the 100-day EMA crosses zero as it did at every prior bottom, or this becomes the first cycle to bottom without it, which would fit the shallower-each-time trend.”
No time frame was given for when the next bottom could occur, with CryptoQuant specifying the zero line as the “level to watch in the coming weeks.”
Bear market reversal signals copy history
As Cointelegraph reported, multiple bear-market reversal signals have come from onchain sources in recent weeks, echoing 2022.
Related: $60.4K Becomes ‘most important area’: Five things to know in Bitcoin this week
Despite these now locking in, market participants broadly expect new macro lows to enter before bulls regain the upper hand.
Last week, fellow CryptoQuant contributor Axel Adler Jr. highlighted other supply data presenting mixed signals over short and mid-term BTC price action. Supply in loss, Adler calculated, could still be two months off levels that traditionally correspond to the end of Bitcoin bear markets.
“Until then, it is more accurate to treat capitulation as a process rather than a completed fact,” he wrote.
Privacy-focused layer-1 blockchain Secret Network is proposing to move from its longtime home on Cosmos to Ethereum layer-2 Arbitrum, citing security risks from artificial intelligence, among other reasons.
Secret Network has been running privacy-preserving smart contracts on Cosmos since 2020, as the ecosystem had strong momentum back then, but the “environment has changed,” the team said Tuesday.
“The security risk is the part we take most seriously,” it said. “Old code is becoming dramatically easier to analyze … With AI, the cost of attacking stale code is falling across the board.”
The recent Axelar-Secret IBC bridge exploit highlighted growing security risk from aging, under-maintained code — a risk the team argues AI-assisted exploitation is making worse. The release of advanced AI models such as Anthropic’s Claude Mythos 5 has dramatically increased the capabilities for discovering and potentially exploiting code vulnerabilities.
Liquidity has thinned
The Secret team described Arbitrum as having “deep liquidity, tooling, wallet and exchange support, and thousands of builders composing with one another,” and said “liquidity has thinned” on Cosmos while builders have “drifted to other ecosystems.”
“The tooling you’d want to count on is shakier than it used to be, and a number of projects that once anchored Cosmos have migrated,” it added.
“Attacks that used to take deep manual effort are getting cheaper as models get better at reading contracts, tracing assumptions, and turning a forgotten edge case into a working exploit.”
The proposal, which requires a governance vote, follows a bridge exploit in June that resulted in the loss of $4.7 million in bridged assets but did not affect Secret’s native token, SCRT.
Related: Secret Network bridge exploited for $4.7M with ‘infinite mint’ bug
For SCRT to endure, it needs a new stable home, and the Ethereum ecosystem is that home, the team said.
The team is planning a one-time snapshot of SCRT balances on Sept. 1, which will be used to issue a new ERC-20 SCRT contract on Arbitrum.
Dwindling DeFi value locked
The total value locked in the Cosmos ecosystem is around $2 billion, down 88% from its peak during the 2021 bull market. Comparatively, Arbitrum is the leading layer-2 network by total value secured, which is $17.4 billion, according to L2Beat.
Secret Network has just $1.3 million in TVL on Cosmos, according to DefiLlama.
SCRT holders did not react well to the news, with the token tanking 24% over the past 24 hours to 4.1 cents, down more than 99% from its 2021 peak, according to CoinGecko.
Secret is not the only network to leave Cosmos. In February, privacy-focused blockchain NilChain, built with the Cosmos SDK, left the ecosystem in a move to Ethereum.
The Sei Network completed a full Cosmos-to-EVM transition in June, closing down its native Cosmos transaction layer entirely and becoming Ethereum-based.
Stablecoin blockchain Noble also announced it was moving from the Cosmos ecosystem to Ethereum in January.
Features: The biggest blockchain upgrades still to come in 2026
Disclosure: This article does not represent investment advice. The content and materials featured on this page are for educational purposes only.
XRPPower integrates AI analysis, automated management, and risk monitoring as investors explore new digital finance solutions amid global market uncertainty.
Summary
- XRPPower highlights AI-powered digital asset management as investors seek alternatives amid market uncertainty.
- It promotes its AI intelligent system for automated digital asset services in the evolving fintech market.
- XRPPower introduces AI-driven asset management tools as global investors navigate changing market conditions.
Entering 2026, global financial markets remain highly focused on the Federal Reserve’s interest rate policy. In recent years, the Fed has maintained relatively high interest rates to combat inflation, and whether it will continue to cut rates or maintain high rates in the future will continue to influence global capital flows and remain a key focus for investors.
While the crude oil market presents investment opportunities, prices are often influenced by multiple factors, including the global economy, geopolitics, and supply and demand. A sudden event can disrupt the existing market rhythm.
Gold has long been considered a safe-haven asset, but its price can also experience corrections when the dollar strengthens or interest rates remain high.
While real estate possesses long-term investment value, it is easily affected by changes in loan interest rates, the economic environment, and market demand. It involves long capital ties and relatively limited liquidity.
For many investors, the real regret is not missing out on a price surge, but watching their assets shrink amidst market volatility, unable to find a more suitable investment approach.
With the continuous integration of AI and fintech, the digital finance industry in 2026 is entering a more intelligent and efficient development phase. More and more investors are beginning to pay attention to the new changes brought about by technological innovation. XRPPower, keeping pace with this trend, continuously upgrades its AI intelligent system, integrating intelligent analysis, automated management, and risk monitoring into platform operations. It constantly optimizes product experience and operational processes, making the platform safer, more transparent, and more convenient. Both new and long-term users can easily understand platform rules and experience more efficient digital asset services.
Join XRPPower and experience the long-term benefits of AI intelligence!
1. Free account registration
2. Choose contract options
The platform offers a variety of product periods and options. Before participating, users can view the product term, rules, settlement methods, and related instructions, and choose according to their needs.
3. Supports mainstream digital asset payments
Supports payments using mainstream digital assets such as BTC, ETH, XRP, USDT, and USDC. The process is simple and convenient.
4. Automatic profit settlement
During product operation, the system will automatically complete daily settlements according to product rules, and profits will be returned to the account balance. Users can choose to withdraw funds or continue participating in other products according to platform rules.
5. Invite friends to share platform rewards
Share a referral with friends using an exclusive invitation code or link. Subject to platform activity rules and receive a 3% + 2% referral reward. Depending on different products and activity rules, the cumulative reward can reach up to $100,000.
Popular earnings details
- Investment Amount: $1,000, Contract Period: 7 days, Daily Earnings: $13.2, Total Earnings: $92.4, Principal $1,000 returned upon maturity.
- Investment Amount: $5,000, Contract Period: 15 days, Daily Earnings: $70.50, Total Earnings: $1,057.5, Principal $5,000 returned upon maturity.
- Investment Amount: $10,000, Contract Period: 20 days, Daily Earnings: $153, Total Earnings: $3,060, Principal $10,000 returned upon maturity.
View more contracts with different yields
XRPPower security, compliance, and protection
XRPPower, headquartered in London, UK, adheres to a development philosophy of security, transparency, and standardization. It continuously references relevant international financial industry standards to improve its platform technology, risk management, and compliance operation system. All product rules, cycles, and settlement information are publicly displayed, and users can query and verify relevant information at any time.
The platform employs multi-layered security mechanisms, including SSL/TLS data encryption, two-factor authentication (2FA), separate storage of cold and hot wallets, multi-signature, and AI-powered intelligent risk monitoring, to comprehensively protect account, data, and digital asset security. Simultaneously, the platform continuously draws on risk management and internal control concepts widely adopted by international professional institutions such as PwC to continuously improve platform transparency, operational standardization, and long-term service capabilities, striving to create a safer, more stable, and transparent digital asset service platform for global users.
2026 investment summary
The financial market is always accompanied by both opportunities and risks. Whether choosing crude oil, gold, real estate, or focusing on digital asset services, investors should fully understand the product rules and risks, develop a reasonable asset allocation plan based on their own needs, and find a suitable long-term development direction in the ever-changing market environment.
With the continuous integration of AI technology and fintech, XRPPower is providing various product cycles and solutions through intelligent analysis and its platform to meet the short-term or long-term asset allocation needs of different users. Product rules, cycles, and settlement information are all open, transparent, searchable, and verifiable, helping users develop more reasonable investment strategies based on their own goals and explore a more stable development direction in long-term planning.
Learn more on the official website.
Disclosure: This content is provided by a third party. Neither crypto.news nor the author of this article endorses any product mentioned on this page. Users should conduct their own research before taking any action related to the company.
The US Commodity Futures Trading Commission has sued a North Carolina man, accusing him of operating a commodity pool featuring crypto that defrauded investors of more than $14 million.
The CFTC’s lawsuit, filed in federal court on Tuesday, alleged that Trevor Vernon and his company, Argent Capital Management, operated a commodity pool featuring equity index futures, options on equity index futures and crypto.
The agency alleged that from March 2022 to February 2026, Vernon solicited $14.8 million from at least 60 investors and falsely claimed he was a successful trader, even though his trading actually “resulted in consistent and catastrophic losses” for the pool’s investors.
The lawsuit is a rare crypto-related enforcement action from the CFTC, which is angling to oversee the crypto industry while facing questions from some lawmakers about whether it has the resources to police the complicated and rapidly growing sector.
The agency alleged that as part of the scheme, Vernon traded crypto, including Bitcoin (BTC) and Ether (ETH), which the CFTC asserted were commodities.
CFTC alleges Vernon ran pool “akin to a Ponzi scheme”
The CFTC alleged in its complaint that Vernon made false statements to existing and potential investors, including in quarterly account updates and monthly performance emails.
The agency claimed Vernon’s trading of crypto, as well as futures and options on stock indices, resulted in losses of more than $8.6 million.
Related: CME Group sues CFTC over crypto perpetual futures
The CFTC said Vernon never disclosed the losses to investors and alleged he misappropriated $3 million to pay investors “in a manner akin to a Ponzi scheme” to hide his losses. He also allegedly misappropriated $136,000 for private air travel, according to the lawsuit.
The CFTC accused Argent Capital Management of failing to register with the agency as required by federal commodities law, and claimed Vernon made false statements to the regulator in January about the issues alleged in its complaint.
The CFTC charged Vernon with seven counts related to fraud, failure to register and making false statements.
It asked the court to permanently ban Vernon from registration and trading, along with disgorgement, penalties and restitution.
Features: From Bitcoin critics to blockchain believers: The 5 biggest crypto backflips
The Federal Reserve releases the minutes from its June 16-17 policy meeting on Wednesday at 2 p.m. ET. Investors hoping for clarity on a September rate hike may come away with less than they expect.
Chair Kevin Warsh withheld his own rate projection this cycle. He also issued a policy statement of just 130 words that dropped forward guidance entirely. That leaves the minutes as the only detailed record of the committee’s internal debate.
A Committee Split Between Hawks and Doves
The FOMC held rates steady at 3.50% to 3.75% on June 17. That marked the fourth consecutive hold. Nine of 18 FOMC policymakers penciled in at least one 2026 hike. Warsh declined to submit a projection of his own.
The committee met before the Bureau of Labor Statistics released its June payrolls report. That report showed just 57,000 new jobs, the weakest reading in four months. Any hawkish language in the minutes reflects a labor market that still looked solid at the time. The softer picture came days later.
The CME FedWatch Tool now prices roughly a 50% to 55% chance of a September hike. That is down from 66% before a weaker-than-expected June jobs report. Warsh addressed the uncertainty directly at his press conference.
“We recognize that inflation has been running well ahead of the Fed’s long-stated inflation
goal of 2 percent that’s been going on for more than five years. Persistently high prices are a
burden for the American people. But the recent past need not be prologue.”
— Kevin Warsh.
Why the Silence Itself Is the Story
Warsh has pushed for a leaner communication style since taking office. He argues forward guidance entangles the Fed in markets that should react to data instead.
That approach puts unusual weight on Wednesday’s release. No accompanying statement language exists for comparison. Speaking at the Sintra policy forum in July, Warsh left little doubt about his inflation stance. he stated that people should not expect his Fed to be comfortable with inflation above 2%
The minutes could reveal how close the committee’s hawks came to pushing for a hike in June. Or they could leave the disagreement as vague as the statement did.
Either way, a chair who prefers silence may keep investors waiting past Wednesday for real clarity.
The post Markets Wait on Fed Minutes: What to Expect from Today’s Release appeared first on BeInCrypto.
Crinetics Pharmaceuticals shares nearly doubled on Monday, July 6 after Vertex Pharmaceuticals agreed to buy the company for $10 billion in cash.
Vertex will pay $85 a share. That is roughly double Crinetics’ closing price the day before Vertex announced the deal.
What Vertex Is Actually Buying
Crinetics makes Palsonify, a pill for acromegaly, a rare disorder that causes excess growth hormone. Patients previously relied on regular injections, so a once-daily pill is a real upgrade in convenience.
Vertex, known for its cystic fibrosis drugs, is betting big on that convenience. It has a second drug in late-stage trials for another rare hormone condition. Together, the two products could bring in more than $5 billion a year at their peak.
William Blair analyst Myles Minter said the price tag makes sense if that sales target holds up.
“Investors will debate this (stock was down 1.8% after hours), but we view this as reasonable if the peak sales number can be achieved.”
Retail sentiment on Crinetics flipped from bearish to bullish within a day. The GameStop eBay takeover saga shows how fast retail mood can swing on buyout news.
Is There Any Upside Left?
Once a company announces a cash buyout, its stock stops trading on its own business prospects. It trades toward the agreed price instead.
Crinetics is already close to that $85 target. The Riot Platforms Bitfarms takeover played out the same way, with shares settling near the offer price.
Most of the reward has already landed. What remains is a small gap, plus the risk that the deal falls through before it closes in the third quarter.
The post Why Crinetics Stock Doubled After Vertex’s $10 Billion Buyout appeared first on BeInCrypto.
Major tokens under pressure as U.S. attacks Iran
10 Marvel Heroes Strong Enough To Stop Doom
‘Weak and inconsistent’ safeguarding of NI school funds, report finds
-
Fashion4 days agoWeekend Open Thread: High Hopes
-
NewsBeat3 days agoTaylor Swift and Travis Kelce wedding staffer hilariously struggles to keep her cool while checking in megastars
-
Fashion1 day agoOpen Thread: What Great Books Have You Read Recently?
-
Crypto World7 days agoAirdrop Registration Becomes Key Focus For Remittix As RTX Launch Updates Approach
-
Politics5 days agoThe House | “Reframing the debate from a binary discussion of winners and losers”: Yuan Yang reviews ‘We Are Not Machines’
-
Crypto World5 days agoStandard Chartered Secures MiCA License as ESMA Adds 37 New Crypto Firms
-
Business1 day agoAXT Shares Jump Nearly 14% as Semiconductor Materials Maker Rebounds on AI-Linked Indium Phosphide Demand
-
Sports7 days agoBroncos roster: OL Ben Powers (No. 74) entering final year of contract
-
Crypto World6 days agoBinance stock trading tops $1B in first month after launch
-
Crypto World1 day ago
SK hynix (000660.KS) Stock Dips as $28B Nasdaq ADR Offering Drives AI Memory Expansion
-
Crypto World6 days agoAlibaba-affiliate Ant Group enters the humanoid robot market with 12 deals
-
Crypto World3 days agoSouth Africa proposes crypto tax guidance under existing rules
-
News Videos2 days agoBest Time to Enter Small Caps Right Now? Another Bull Run? | Financially Free
-
News Videos1 day agoWhats Hidden Inside This Cash Register? #treasure #reselling #money
-
Tech3 days agoLenovo laptops are now shipping with YMTC SSDs, a sign of Chinese NAND entering the mainstream
-
Business6 days agoMeta Platforms Stock Jumps 7% Today as Bloomberg Reports Company Plans to Enter the Cloud Business
-
NewsBeat6 days agoNew exhibition reflects five decades of movement between island of Ireland and GB
-
Business5 days agoWhat a 10 Percent Drop Means for Buyers, Sellers and Renters
-
Crypto World5 days agoBinance Re-Enters Philippines As EU MiCA Rules Restrict Access
-
News Videos2 days agoAvoid entering in FOMO #bitcoin #cryptocurrency #trading #scalping
You must be logged in to post a comment Login