Connect with us
DAPA Banner
DAPA Coin
DAPA
COIN PAYMENT ASSET
PRIVACY · BLOCKDAG · HOMOMORPHIC ENCRYPTION · RUST
ElGamal Encrypted MINE DAPA
🚫 GENESIS SOLD OUT
DAPAPAY COMING

Crypto World

How Would a Hormuz Toll Affect Oil Prices?

Published

on

How Would a Hormuz Toll Affect Oil Prices?

Oil prices tumbled to two-month lows after the US and Iran reached a peace deal to reopen the Strait of Hormuz. Yet beneath the relief, traders are quietly positioning for a rebound.

The reason is a catch buried in the deal. Iran plans to charge a toll after a 60-day grace period, a cost the market may already be pricing into the months ahead.

An Iran Deal That Adds a Toll to a Fifth of Global Oil

The deal reopens the Strait of Hormuz, the waterway that carried roughly one-fifth of global oil before the war shut it. Before the conflict, ships paid nothing to pass.

Want more insights like this? Sign up for Editor Harsh Notariya’s Daily Newsletter here.

Advertisement

Iran now says it will collect “service fees” once a 60-day toll-free window ends. President Trump calls the reopening permanently toll-free, while Vice President JD Vance and Iran point to fees after the 60 days.

Markets took the truce as relief. Brent crude oil price fell about 5% to near $83, and WTI crude oil price slid to under $80, both at multi-month lows.

That drop reflects near-term supply relief. The futures curve tells a more cautious story.

The Curve Cooled, but Positioning Turned Bullish

During the war, the backwardation in Brent went extreme. Backwardation means the front-month contract trades above the later-month contracts, a sign of near-term scarcity.

The spread between the first and second Brent contracts hit about $10.27 in April. It has since collapsed to roughly $0.67, so the market sees the immediate shortage easing. Still, the spread stays positive.

Brent shows mild backwardation rather than flipping into contango, where later months trade above the front. The near-term squeeze has cooled, but the market is not yet pricing a glut.

Advertisement
Brent BRN1 BRN2 Spread: TradingView

Positioning leans the other way. In the latest Commitments of Traders report, a weekly CFTC snapshot of who holds futures, speculators cut short bets by about 9,300 contracts by June 9.

Brent COT Positioning
Brent COT Positioning: Tradingster

Options say the same. On the United States Brent Oil Fund (BNO), the put-call ratio sat near 0.08, meaning calls vastly outnumbered puts. Call buying continued to grow, with the ratio dropping to 0.06 as the toll news broke.

BNO Put-Call Ratio June 12
BNO Put-Call Ratio June 12: Barchart

So the curve has priced the reopening, while traders bet on what comes after. The size of that bet depends on the toll.

BNO Put-Call Ratio June 15
BNO Put-Call Ratio June 15. Source: Barchart

BRN2 is only about a month further out, and the front contract still trades above it, so the curve has calmed without turning bearish. That leaves room for the toll to retighten it, which aligns with the bullish positioning.

What a Hormuz Toll Could Do to Oil Prices

Here is the math. Before the war, Brent traded near $70 with zero transit cost. The Strait moves about 7.6 billion barrels of oil a year.

A toll of $0.50, $1, or $2 per barrel would hand Iran roughly $3.8 billion, $7.6 billion, or $15.2 billion a year. The $1 level is not hypothetical. During the conflict, an informal $1-per-barrel fee was being levied. Tolls of up to $2 million per voyage were reported.

The direct cost is small and mostly absorbed by producers at first. The bigger lever is the risk premium, the extra price markets pay for supply uncertainty.

That premium bites harder now because the cushion is thin. The US Strategic Petroleum Reserve, the national emergency stockpile, just hit a 43-year low.

Advertisement
Hormuz Toll Price Scenarios. Source: BeInCrypto

From a normalized reopening near $80, analysts estimate a smooth toll could add $2 to $6, while a messy one could add $10 or more. That points to Brent in the high $80s to mid $90s, with a path back above $100 if the reopening turns disorderly.

To be clear, the $1 toll, or even $2, does not push Brent to $100. That tail runs through disruption, not the fee. A contested rollout that chokes traffic again would revive the war-era risk premium. That fear, not the charge, sent Brent above $100 during the conflict.

Expert and market signals line up with that risk.

Oil Prices, Forecasts, and the Bets Point the Same Way

Industry leaders have flagged the upside. Executives at Chevron and ExxonMobil warned the physical Brent oil price could spike toward $150 to $160 if inventories keep draining.

The US Energy Information Administration (EIA) expects Brent to average about $105 in June and July before easing later. Goldman Sachs trimmed forecasts on the deal but warned of renewed volatility if Hormuz does not reopen cleanly.

Advertisement

Prediction markets agree at the margin. On Polymarket, bettors put the odds of crude hitting a record at roughly 16% by December 31, still the most-backed window even after the deal cooled the odds.

Crude Oil Record Odds
Crude Oil Record Odds. Source: Polymarket

For now, oil prices sit near two-month lows: Brent around $83 and WTI near $80. The next CFTC positioning report, the first to capture the toll news, will show whether the bullish lean held.

A clean, toll-free reopening would let oil prices keep easing toward the EIA’s high $70s path. A contested service-fee regime after 60 days would re-tighten the market and push it back toward the high $80s and beyond.

The post How Would a Hormuz Toll Affect Oil Prices? appeared first on BeInCrypto.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

Crypto World

John Thune shuts down hopes for CLARITY Act vote before recess

Published

on

Polymarket chart shows the CLARITY Act’s 2026 passage odds falling to 33% after peaking above 80% in February.

Senate Majority Leader John Thune has ruled out passage of the CLARITY Act before the August recess, as Polymarket traders cut its chance of becoming law in 2026 to 33%.

Summary

  • John Thune has ruled out CLARITY Act passage before the Senate’s August recess.
  • Ron Hammond says election politics is drowning out the bill’s bipartisan support.
  • Polymarket traders now give the CLARITY Act a 33% chance of passage in 2026.

Fortune reported on July 24 that Thune does not expect the Senate to approve the crypto market structure bill before lawmakers leave Washington, removing a deadline that industry supporters had viewed as critical to its passage this year.

Attention has now moved to the short period after the November midterm elections, when Congress will return with government funding measures, defense legislation and other unfinished business competing for floor time. Ron Hammond, head of policy and advocacy at Wintermute, told Fortune that the bill still has enough bipartisan support but has become caught in election-year disputes.

Advertisement

Hammond argued that political messaging, rather than an absence of Senate votes, has become the immediate problem. With Democrats preparing to campaign against President Donald Trump and alleged corruption, he expects some lawmakers to avoid supporting a major crypto bill before voters go to the polls.

“The votes are there, but the election politics are louder. The latter will dissipate after November and that’s a narrow but very possible window,” Hammond told Fortune.

Election politics has become the main obstacle

A dispute over Trump’s crypto businesses has complicated negotiations even after Republicans signaled that they would consider limits on digital asset activity by elected officials. Senate Democrats have demanded provisions preventing senior government figures from using public office to profit from crypto ventures.

Advertisement

Under the latest draft, ethics restrictions involving Trump and other federal officials would be enforced through the Department of Justice. Several Democratic lawmakers have rejected that approach because the department operates under the executive branch and, in their view, should not hold sole enforcement power over a sitting president.

Seven Senate Democrats have also opposed the updated text over ethics, consumer protection and enforcement concerns, according to a July 23 crypto.news report. Republicans hold 53 Senate seats and would need support from at least seven Democrats to reach the 60 votes usually required to advance the legislation.

Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer has encouraged Democrats to center their midterm message on allegations of corruption involving Trump, Fortune reported. Hammond believes that strategy could make Democratic senators less willing to hand the administration a legislative victory before November, even if they support federal crypto rules in principle.

Banking groups have added another source of resistance by opposing provisions that could allow rewards on stablecoin holdings. Those associations have warned that such products could pull customer deposits away from traditional banks, reducing funds available for lending.

Advertisement

According to Hammond, banks and other opponents used the extended negotiations to push the bill beyond an important deadline. Their campaign has kept disputes over stablecoin rewards, regulatory authority and ethics controls open while the remaining Senate calendar has continued to shrink.

Goldman Sachs CEO David Solomon, however, has separated his position from banking trade groups seeking tougher restrictions. As reported by crypto.news, Solomon was “very supportive” of advancing the legislation because it would establish a U.S. crypto market structure and give digital asset companies clearer operating rules.

While acknowledging that lawmakers could still debate parts of the proposal, Solomon argued that Congress should not abandon the entire framework because it remains imperfect. He believes the legislation could support market stability and place companies under more consistent rules, although he did not specifically endorse the disputed stablecoin reward language.

Passage odds have fallen to 33%

Crypto executives have continued pressing Congress to act despite the shrinking timetable. Ripple CEO Brad Garlinghouse backed comments from the company’s chief legal officer, Stuart Alderoty, who urged lawmakers not to abandon an achievable bill while searching for a perfect compromise.

Advertisement

Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong has also argued that the bipartisan proposal is ready for Senate consideration after months of negotiations, according to crypto.news. Those appeals have not produced a scheduled vote, while Thune’s assessment indicates that the chamber will enter recess without resolving the remaining disputes.

Prediction-market traders have responded by cutting their expectations further. Polymarket now gives the CLARITY Act a 33% chance of becoming law in 2026, with more than $2.56 million wagered on the contract.

Polymarket chart shows the CLARITY Act’s 2026 passage odds falling to 33% after peaking above 80% in February.
Source: Polymarket

Polymarket’s chart shows that the odds climbed above 80% in late February before losing ground over the following months. The probability fell toward 30% in July as ethics disputes, banking opposition, and the approaching recess weakened confidence in passage.

Once lawmakers return after the elections, Hammond expects a narrow opportunity in which campaign pressure may ease enough to restart negotiations. Fortune reported that the effort would still compete with funding deadlines and defense legislation, leaving senators limited time to settle the remaining ethics, banking and enforcement disputes.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Crypto World

Strive’s SATA Rebounds, Recovers June Losses to Near Par

Published

on

Crypto Breaking News

Strive’s variable-rate perpetual preferred shares, SATA, have rebounded sharply after hitting a June low of $83.30, rising to around $97 and recovering most of the selloff, according to Yahoo Finance data. The improvement has placed the shares within roughly 3% of their $100 par value.

The price recovery matters because SATA is part of a broader, fast-growing approach among Bitcoin-treasury companies: using preferred equity designed to trade close to par. The objective is to raise capital for a corporate Bitcoin (BTC) treasury without issuing more common stock, while dividends adjust to support the shares’ pricing.

Key takeaways

  • SATA has climbed from a June low of $83.30 to roughly $97, putting it about 3% below its $100 par value, per Yahoo Finance.
  • Strive introduced SATA in November 2025 to fund expansion of its Bitcoin treasury through preferred equity rather than additional common share issuance.
  • Preferred-share “digital credit” strategies are increasingly being used by Bitcoin-treasury firms to structure financing around dividends that can adjust over time.
  • Strategy’s STRC experienced a similar late-June decline but has partially recovered, trading around $87—still below par.

How SATA is structured and why it exists

Strive introduced SATA in November 2025 as part of its effort to finance expansion of its Bitcoin treasury through preferred equity. In Strive’s announcement about the Nasdaq listing and the related closing of an oversubscribed upsized IPO, the company described SATA as a variable-rate perpetual preferred designed to trade near $100 par by adjusting its dividend rate.

That structure is intended to offer investors a mechanism to “anchor” valuation around par without requiring Strive to repeatedly issue common shares. For the company, it creates a financing channel that is directly tied to the treasury-building thesis—supporting Bitcoin accumulation while attempting to manage the equity dilution burden that comes with selling additional common stock.

Strive’s approach also reflects a wider market trend. The article notes that SATA is one of several preferred-share products linked to Bitcoin treasury strategies, a segment some market participants describe as “digital credit.”

Advertisement

June selloff: SATA recovered, STRC remains below par

The key datapoint for traders is the swing back toward par. Yahoo Finance data shows SATA fell to $83.30 in June before recovering to about $97. While that still leaves room for improvement, the rebound suggests that the market is rewarding the shares’ par-focused design after periods of heightened stress.

Strive’s preferred structure sits within a peer set that includes Strategy’s STRC. Strategy’s preferred-like product was launched in 2025 with a similar objective—maintaining a $100 share price through a variable dividend. According to Yahoo Finance, STRC fell sharply during the late-June selloff as well, before recovering. However, STRC continues to trade below par at around $87.

As a practical matter, the divergence between SATA’s relative recovery and STRC’s remaining discount may shape near-term investor expectations for how quickly these instruments can reprice after market-wide pressure. It also highlights an important asymmetry: even when products share similar structural goals, their outcomes can differ based on investor sentiment, capital market conditions, and the companies’ execution over time.

Bitcoin treasury scale and the preferred-share thesis

Preferred-share strategies are ultimately tied to the broader credibility of the treasury-building plan. In that context, the article points to BitcoinTreasuries.NET for rankings of public Bitcoin treasury companies.

Advertisement

Strategy remains the largest public corporate Bitcoin holder, with 843,775 BTC, according to BitcoinTreasuries.NET. Strive, meanwhile, has risen to seventh place with 19,921 BTC. While Strive is smaller than Strategy by BTC holdings, the company’s positioning indicates it is still participating meaningfully in the treasury race.

This ranking dynamic matters for preferred shareholders because treasury scale can influence expectations about dividend sustainability and overall business resilience—especially in a market where equity instruments are often priced around confidence in both operations and long-term balance-sheet strength.

Samson Mow: preferred-share confidence is “restoring”

Samson Mow, founder and CEO of Jan3, told Cointelegraph that recent adjustments by Bitcoin treasury companies are beginning to restore confidence in preferred-share products and support his broader view that Bitcoin has already found its bottom.

In the same conversation, Mow pointed to actions by Strategy that encourage STRC to return to par. He said that SATA’s return toward par could reinforce market confidence in the overall model, adding that the products are capitalized for multiple years of dividend payments and that there was “no reason to panic” during the selloff.

Advertisement

Mow also connected the improved trajectory of preferred-share instruments to ongoing refinement across the Bitcoin treasury sector. In his view, newer entrants and alternative structures can further validate the approach—citing Lyn Alden’s Orange Juice treasury company, which launched on July 15 with plans to operate a Bitcoin treasury and an intention to use a different approach, including a lower Bitcoin cost basis.

What to watch from an investor’s perspective is whether these dynamics translate into sustained repricing toward par across the peer set. SATA’s movement back toward $100 is a signal, but the market will likely continue to judge each issuer based on how quickly its preferred instrument stabilizes and how resilient its dividend profile appears under changing conditions.

For traders and long-term investors, the next checkpoint is whether SATA’s recovery holds as other preferred-share offerings—particularly Strategy’s STRC—continue to find their footing. The broader unanswered question is how durable “near-par” performance remains across full market cycles, especially if Bitcoin volatility increases and treasury companies face new capital and balance-sheet decisions.

Risk & affiliate notice: Crypto assets are volatile and capital is at risk. This article may contain affiliate links. Read full disclosure

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Crypto World

Memecoin.Fun raises $3.5M as Robinhood Chain launchpad race grows

Published

on

What is Lighter? Robinhood's perps DEX

Robinhood Chain token launch platform Memecoin.Fun has raised $3.5 million in strategic funding as the network’s decentralized exchanges approach $9 billion in cumulative trading volume.

Summary

  • Memecoin.Fun raised $3.5 million in strategic financing led by Becker Ventures.
  • Funding will support launchpad infrastructure, cross-chain bridges, and a multichain memecoin platform.
  • Robinhood Chain’s growing activity is increasing competition among token issuance platforms.

According to an official announcement from Memecoin.Fun, Becker Ventures led the financing, while BitValue Capital, Mason Labs, Negentropy Capital, and angel investor Billy Wen also participated. The platform completed the transaction through the USDG token, although the announcement did not disclose Memecoin.Fun’s valuation or the terms received by investors.

Memecoin.Fun plans to use the capital to build its core products and technical systems. Its proposed work includes launchpad infrastructure for Robinhood Chain, cross-chain bridge functions, and research and operations for a platform designed to support memecoins across multiple blockchains.

Advertisement

By developing launch and cross-chain tools at the same time, Memecoin.Fun is entering a market that already includes projects competing for token creators and traders on Robinhood Chain. The funding announcement did not provide a release schedule for its launchpad, bridge, or multichain product.

Funding targets launch and cross-chain tools

Memecoin.Fun’s financing arrives as token issuance platforms prepare new products for the recently launched Ethereum Layer 2 network. Robinhood Chain has focused on bringing traditional financial assets on-chain, but early trading has been led mainly by speculative tokens, according to data previously reported by crypto.news.

Memecoins have generated more than 80% of decentralized exchange activity on Robinhood Chain, crypto.news reported. The concentration gives token launch platforms access to the network’s most active trading segment, even as Robinhood Chain develops infrastructure for tokenized stocks and other real-world assets.

Advertisement

Another launchpad, Pons, unveiled plans for its V2 upgrade on July 23, according to an earlier crypto.news report. The update is scheduled for the following week and is expected to introduce an Ether-based bonding curve, Uniswap V4 integration, creator payments in ETH, and trading pairs linked to tokenized real-world assets.

According to the Pons team, V2 will change how tokens are issued, traded, and transferred into decentralized liquidity pools on Robinhood Chain. Two partners are still auditing the contracts, however, and Pons cautioned that its planned features could change before deployment.

Pons attributed the redesign to feedback collected during its first weeks of operation. After facing several attacks following launch, the team worked with infrastructure partners to stabilize the protocol and stated that it would continue developing products for Robinhood Chain traders.

The two platforms are taking different routes within the same emerging market. Memecoin.Fun has secured outside capital to develop a launchpad, bridge functions, and multichain support, while Pons is preparing an upgrade centered on ETH liquidity, Uniswap V4, creator revenue, and tokenized-asset pairs.

Advertisement

Neither announcement supplied comparable figures for users, trading volume, token launches, or revenue. As a result, the information released by the projects does not yet show which platform has gained more activity or whether their upcoming products will attract lasting liquidity.

Robinhood Chain activity raises competitive stakes

Within three weeks of its launch, Robinhood Chain attracted $431 million in total value locked and nearly $400 million in stablecoin market capitalization, according to figures previously cited by crypto.news. Those totals give launch platforms a growing pool of on-chain capital, although crypto.news noted that most decentralized exchange activity has remained tied to memecoins rather than tokenized real-world assets.

FalconX reported additional signs of rapid adoption in a research primer published Monday. Citing network data, the digital asset brokerage said Robinhood Chain was processing about 6 million transactions per day and serving more than 250,000 daily active users after its July 1 mainnet launch.

Using Artemis data, FalconX also reported that Robinhood Chain had moved ahead of Coinbase’s Base network on some activity measures. The research firm placed cumulative decentralized exchange volume near $9 billion, indicating that traders have generated substantial turnover during the chain’s opening weeks.

Advertisement

FalconX described Robinhood Chain as one of the busiest blockchains following its mainnet debut, though its primer did not establish how much of the activity would continue after the initial launch period. crypto.news data showing memecoins responsible for more than four-fifths of exchange activity also indicates that speculative assets have driven much of the network’s early use.

For Memecoin.Fun, the funding provides resources to compete for that trading activity while building links with other chains. Its planned bridge could allow assets or users to move between networks, while the all-chain product would extend its token-launch model beyond Robinhood Chain if the team completes the proposed development.

The announcement did not identify supported chains, bridge security partners, an audit schedule, or dates for product deployment. Those details will determine how quickly Memecoin.Fun can put the $3.5 million financing to work as Pons and other launchpads release competing tools for Robinhood Chain’s growing base of traders and token creators.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Crypto World

Samson Mow says SATA rebound could pull Strategy’s STRC to par

Published

on

Strive’s SATA stock trades at $96.58, approaching its $100 par value.

Strive’s SATA preferred shares have recovered nearly 16% from their June low to about $97, prompting Jan3 CEO Samson Mow to predict that the rebound could help Strategy’s STRC return to its $100 par value.

Summary

  • Strive’s SATA has rebounded nearly 16% from its June low to about $97.
  • Samson Mow expects SATA’s recovery to help Strategy’s STRC return toward its $100 par value.
  • Three major U.S. preferred stock ETFs collectively hold $756 million worth of STRC.

Yahoo Finance data show SATA has climbed from $83.30 and now trades within roughly 3% of the level it was designed to track. The recovery has erased most of the preferred stock’s late-June decline, while STRC remains about 13% below par despite receiving increased demand from major U.S. exchange-traded funds.

Strive’s SATA stock trades at $96.58, approaching its $100 par value.
Source: Yahoo Finance

According to Mow, steps taken by Bitcoin treasury companies to improve their balance sheets and support their preferred shares have started rebuilding confidence in the products. He told Cointelegraph that SATA’s return toward $100 could reassure investors that the funding structure used by Strive and Strategy remains functional.

“I think every action that Strategy has undertaken to strengthen their balance sheet and encourage STRC to go back to par is also working.”

Advertisement

Mow expects the two securities to move together because investors are assessing whether Bitcoin-linked preferred shares can continue funding their dividends and hold close to their stated values.

“But everything sort of works in tandem. I think as SATA returns to par, you’re going to see STRC return to par too, because people say, ‘OK, this model’s not broken.’ Everyone is capitalized for three or more years of dividend payments… there was no reason to panic all along,” he added.

SATA’s recovery supports confidence in Bitcoin preferred shares

Strive introduced SATA in November 2025 to raise money for expanding its Bitcoin holdings without issuing more common stock. The variable-rate perpetual preferred shares use dividend adjustments to encourage trading around their $100 par value.

By changing the payout rate when needed, Strive can make SATA more or less attractive to investors as its market price moves. The company designed the structure to provide recurring access to capital while limiting dilution for common shareholders, according to its stated treasury strategy.

Advertisement

Strategy launched STRC in 2025 under a similar model. The preferred stock also uses a variable dividend to keep its price near $100, placing it in a category that Strategy calls “digital credit.”

During the late-June selloff, both products dropped well below their intended levels. SATA has since recovered to around $97, but Yahoo Finance data show STRC closed at $86.89 on July 24 after gaining 2.29% during the session. It later rose to $87.14 in after-hours trading.

Mow views the difference between their recoveries as temporary rather than evidence that STRC’s structure has failed. His forecast rests on investors treating SATA’s rebound as proof that preferred shares backed by Bitcoin treasury companies can recover after a sharp decline.

Alongside the price recovery, Mow pointed to companies refining how they raise capital and manage their Bitcoin holdings. He cited Lyn Alden’s Orange Juice treasury company, launched on July 15, as an example of a new entrant using a different operating model and starting with a lower Bitcoin acquisition cost.

Advertisement

BitcoinTreasuries ranks Strategy as the largest corporate Bitcoin holder, with 843,775 BTC. Strive holds 19,921 BTC, placing it seventh among public companies tracked by the platform.

Strategy leads public companies with 843,775 BTC.
Source: BitcoinTreasuries

Those holdings create different levels of Bitcoin exposure, but both companies rely on capital-market products to support their treasury plans. For Strive, SATA offers a route to fresh funds without selling more common shares, while Strategy uses STRC and other securities to finance additional Bitcoin purchases.

ETF demand strengthens STRC despite its discount

Institutional demand has already placed STRC at the top of three large U.S. preferred stock ETFs, even though the security continues to trade well below par.

Michael Saylor, Strategy’s co-founder and executive chairman, disclosed on July 24 that STRC is now the largest holding in BlackRock’s iShares Preferred and Income Securities ETF, Virtus InfraCap’s U.S. Preferred Stock ETF and VanEck’s Preferred Securities ex Financials ETF.

According to figures shared by Saylor, the three funds collectively hold $756 million of STRC. Their portfolios also contain preferred shares issued by established U.S. companies, giving ETF investors indirect exposure to Strategy’s Bitcoin-linked security alongside traditional income products.

Advertisement

In his X post, Saylor presented the ETF positions as evidence that Strategy’s “digital credit” securities are entering institutional portfolios. The holdings show that asset managers have allocated substantial capital to STRC, although its July 24 closing price remained 13.11% below $100.

STRC’s discount matters to Strategy because the company sells the preferred shares to fund Bitcoin purchases. Strategy can issue stock near or above par and direct the proceeds into Bitcoin, but a large discount reduces the amount of capital it can raise from each newly issued share.

Selling more STRC while it trades around $87 would therefore produce less funding per share than an issuance completed near $100. The lower price could weaken the economics of using the security for Bitcoin accumulation, even if existing ETF demand continues.

Mow’s outlook links SATA’s recovery with a possible improvement in those conditions. If investors interpret Strive’s return toward par as evidence that variable-rate Bitcoin preferred shares can stabilize, his view suggests STRC could attract enough demand to narrow its discount and restore a more efficient funding channel for Strategy.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Crypto World

ETH/BTC Breakout Fuels Altcoin Season 2026 Hopes as Bitcoin Dominance Holds 60%

Published

on

ETH/BTC Breakout Fuels Altcoin Season 2026 Hopes as Bitcoin Dominance Holds 60%

Ethereum (ETH) has printed its first sustained advance against Bitcoin (BTC) in almost a year, breaking out of the descending channel that capped the pair since August 2025.

Bitcoin dominance tells a more cautious story, however. The metric is climbing back to 60%, and analysts remain divided on whether a real altcoin season can start in 2026.

Ethereum Breaks Out Against Bitcoin as Price and Momentum Align

The ETH/BTC three-day chart shows a descending parallel channel in force since August 2025. The pair printed consistent lower lows and lower highs inside it for almost a year.

In July, the ratio finally closed above the channel’s upper boundary. It now trades near 0.0289, with Ethereum at $1,881, down 2.2% in 24 hours. Fresh whales accumulated 50,000 ETH this month as the ratio jumped 6%.

Advertisement

The breakout faces two obstacles overhead. The immediate resistance sits at 0.0316, while the next barrier waits at 0.0352. Moreover, the ratio still trades below the 200-day moving average (blue line). A reclaim of that line could open the road to the first resistance area.

If the pair pulls back, the nearest support stands at 0.0259. That level roughly coincides with the broken channel boundary, which may soon flip into confirmed support.

Momentum broke out first. The three-day Relative Strength Index (RSI) escaped a long-term falling wedge, a bullish pattern, at the end of June. Price followed weeks later, a sequence that often validates trend reversals.

The RSI now reads around 57. Therefore, it has cleared the neutral zone and holds room to run before overbought territory near 70.

Analyst Michael van de Poppe called the move the pair’s first real advance in over a year. Still, he expects Bitcoin to lead in the short term.

Bitcoin Dominance Defends 60% and Delays the Rotation Signal

The monthly Bitcoin dominance chart frames the bigger picture. A long-term descending trendline has capped the metric since 2017, and each touch (blue circle) has started an altcoin season. The first came in 2017 near 80%, and the second in 2021 near 73%.

The third touch arrived in mid-2025, when dominance was rejected at 66%. The metric then slipped below the 0.236 Fibonacci retracement at 59.63%. However, it never reached the 0.382 level at 55.66%, let alone the 0.618 at 49.23%. A drop to those levels would put a full rotation in place.

The three-day chart sharpens the trigger. Dominance has moved sideways between 58% and 60.7% since August 2025. An ascending support line inside that range broke down at the end of May.

Dominance now retests the broken line from below, near 59.5%. The retest coincides with the long-term 0.236 Fibonacci level, creating a confluence of resistance. A rejection here could send the metric through the 58% floor and directly to 55.66%. In contrast, a reclaim would target 61% and delay the altcoin rotation, even as the index shows early momentum.

Benjamin Cowen, founder of IntoTheCryptoverse, offered a counterpoint in his contribution to BeInCrypto’s Market Intelligence expert council and the accompanying video analysis. He argues the classic rotation may never arrive this cycle.

“This is a cycle where Bitcoin topped on apathy rather than euphoria.”

According to Cowen, an apathy top leaves no crowd to rotate into riskier assets. He points to 2019 as the closest parallel and keeps October 2026 as his base case for the cycle bottom.

Advertisement

What Would Confirm Altcoin Season 2026

The ETH/BTC charts suggest a rotation is loading. Price and momentum broke their downtrends within weeks of each other, and softer inflation has supported risk appetite.

The dominance charts demand patience, though. Bulls need dominance rejected near 59.6%, followed by a break under 58% and a slide to 55.66%. Until then, ETH/BTC holding above 0.0259 keeps the setup alive, while a dominance reclaim of 61% would hand the cycle back to bitcoin.

The post ETH/BTC Breakout Fuels Altcoin Season 2026 Hopes as Bitcoin Dominance Holds 60% appeared first on BeInCrypto.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Crypto World

3 Real Reasons Why BitMEX is Shutting Down, and Who Could Be Next

Published

on

Top 10 Derivatives Crypto Exchanges’ Market Share (August 2023)

BitMEX once ruled crypto trading. Now it is shutting down. On September 23, 2026, the exchange that invented the perpetual swap will close for good. The reasons why BitMEX shut down go far beyond the vague review it blamed.

The closing looks calm, not a crash. But three forces pushed BitMEX to quit instead of sell. The same forces now threaten other exchanges too.

1. BitMEX Lost the Market It Built

Why BitMEX Shut Down Began With a Lost Market

BitMEX launched in 2014. It invented the perpetual swap, a trade that never expires. Almost every rival later copied the idea. For years, it was the top spot for leveraged crypto bets.

Advertisement

Then it fell behind. By August 2023, CoinGecko data ranked BitMEX 9th. It held just 0.9% of derivatives trades. Binance had 47.4%.

Top 10 Derivatives Crypto Exchanges’ Market Share (August 2023)
Top 10 Derivatives Crypto Exchanges’ Market Share (August 2023). Source: Coingecko

The slide kept going. This month, market tracker Kaiko put its share below 0.01%. Daily volume was about $400,000. Reuters reported the figures.

Traders go where other traders are. They left for bigger venues. BitMEX handed rivals its share of a market it once led.

2. No Buyer Would Take the Deal

A weak exchange can still be sold. BitMEX could not close a deal.

Crypto researcher Hasu has reportedly followed the firm since 2018. He says the exchange looked for a buyer from February 2025. No sale ever happened. Rivals, meanwhile, raised fresh capital from big finance.

Advertisement

The legal past scared buyers away. US regulators charged BitMEX and its founders in 2020 with weak anti-money laundering controls. All four fought the case, then pleaded guilty. They paid fines but avoided prison.

The bills piled up. A 2021 deal with two US regulators cost $100 million. In January 2025, BitMEX paid another $100 million in criminal fines and received two years of probation. President Donald Trump pardoned the founders in March. BitMEX announced its September shutdown this week.

3. A $270 Million Insurance Fund It Couldn’t Cleanly Sell

What the Insurance Fund and On-Chain Data Show.

Here is the deeper reason. Every leverage exchange keeps a safety pot. It is called an insurance fund. The pot pays out when a losing trade cannot cover itself. In busy times it grows, fed by scraps from closed-out trades.

BitMEX built one of the biggest. On-chain data tells the story. The fund peaked near 37,795 Bitcoin (BTC) in October 2021. Today, it holds about 3,694 BTC. It also holds roughly $30.8 million in Tether (USDT), a stablecoin. That is about 90% smaller than the peak.

BitMEX deliberately reduced the fund in November 2025. Even so, it kept far more cover than its rivals. Its cushion covered 0.88 times open bets. Binance covered just 0.11 times.

Advertisement
BitMEX’s Insurance Fund Coverage
BitMEX’s Insurance Fund Coverage. Source: BitMEX

The fund was never in danger. On October 10, crypto had its biggest wipeout on record. Traders lost $19.35 billion due to forced sales, or liquidations.

BitMEX barely felt it. Its own report showed just $38.5 million of that on its books. The fund gave up only about $2 million.

So a big, healthy fund sat inside a dying exchange. That raised a simple question. Why keep so much cash in a business that is closing?

BitMEX Insurance Fund Designed to accumulate Bitcoin When Someone Got Liquidated. Source: Luke Martin on X
BitMEX Insurance Fund is designed to accumulate Bitcoin when someone gets liquidated. Source: Luke Martin on X

Analysts value what is left at nearly $270 million.

Hasu, like Martin, thinks the fund made BitMEX too hard to sell. He warned about its design back in 2018.

“It started as the golden goose, and then became the noose,” the researcher wrote.

Not everyone agrees. BitMEX calls the closure a business choice. On-chain, the fund has not moved since the news. Binance founder Changpeng Zhao (CZ) blamed years of US pressure instead.

A lawsuit landed the next day. Two former users say BitMEX took cash from their forced trades and fed the fund. They want about 623 BTC back in coins, not dollars. They point to a March 2020 outage. Users were locked out for 25 minutes while $800 million in bets were wiped.

Advertisement

“BitMEX announces it’s shutting down on Sept 23… then the NEXT DAY a proposed class action lands alleging the exchange deliberately designed its platform to FORCE LIQUIDATE customers and seize their bitcoin. Coincidence?” posed Ariel Givner, IP & corporate attorney in FinTech.

Who Could Be Next After BitMEX

BitMEX did not blow up like FTX, the exchange that collapsed in 2022. It closed while it still had the money to pay everyone. Even so, its exit is a warning.

The market keeps shrinking to a few winners. In 2023, the top three venues already ran about 78% of trades. That gap is wider now. Small players are getting squeezed.

The ones most at risk look alike:

  • They offer high leverage.
  • They hold little spare cash.
  • They carry legal baggage.
  • And they run a few other lines of business.

Much of this trading is also moving on-chain. The top perpetual futures venues there cleared trillions last year.

On-chain is not safe either. A TRM Labs report counted 207 hacks and about $972 million stolen in early 2026. In the October 10 crash, Hyperliquid alone saw $10.31 billion in liquidations.

Advertisement

Regulated rivals are moving in too. Kalshi launched the first US perpetual futures in May. Kraken added its own in June. Coinbase started a year earlier.

One big question remains. Where does the $270 million fund go after September? Neither BitMEX nor Arthur Hayes has said.

The lawsuit may force an answer.

Advertisement

For every other exchange, the lesson is simple. Stay relevant. Keep clean books. Be easy to sell. That may be what keeps you alive now.

The post 3 Real Reasons Why BitMEX is Shutting Down, and Who Could Be Next appeared first on BeInCrypto.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Crypto World

Strive’s SATA Rebounds, Recovers Most of June Drop and Holds Near Par

Published

on

Crypto Breaking News

Strive’s SATA preferred shares have rebounded sharply after a late-June selloff, according to Yahoo Finance. The variable-rate perpetual preferred stock rose from a June low of $83.30 to roughly $97, recovering most of its declines and trading within about 3% of its $100 par value.

The rebound matters because SATA is part of a growing slate of Bitcoin-treasury-linked preferred-share products designed to keep their share price near par by dynamically adjusting dividend rates. For investors watching whether this “preferred equity for Bitcoin treasuries” model can hold up during market stress, the way SATA and peers respond to volatility may be the clearest near-term signal.

Key takeaways

  • Yahoo Finance shows Strive’s SATA preferred shares recovered from a June low of $83.30 to around $97, nearing the $100 par value.
  • SATA was introduced in November 2025 as Strive’s mechanism to fund expansion of its Bitcoin treasury through preferred equity rather than issuing more common shares.
  • Similar products are emerging in the Bitcoin corporate sector; Strategy’s STRC launched in 2025 with a related “variable dividend near par” concept.
  • Samson Mow argues that improvements across Bitcoin treasury balance sheets—and SATA’s return toward par—can help restore confidence in the broader preferred-share category.
  • Data from BitcoinTreasuries.NET places Strive as the seventh-largest public Bitcoin treasury holder, with 19,921 BTC.

SATA’s move back toward par

Strive launched SATA in November 2025, framing it as a preferred-equity tool to support its Bitcoin treasury strategy. The company’s approach centers on a variable-rate perpetual preferred share: instead of relying on a fixed coupon, the dividend rate is designed to adjust so the security trades close to its $100 par value.

In practice, that structure gives the market a built-in adjustment lever during changing conditions. When investors re-price the expected dividend stream—whether due to interest-rate moves, crypto sentiment, or company balance-sheet expectations—SATA’s performance can reflect how well the variable dividend mechanism is restoring equilibrium.

After falling to $83.30 in June, the stock’s subsequent recovery to around $97 suggests sellers have largely faded and that the market may be recalibrating its view of the product’s stability.

Advertisement

Why preferred equity is gaining attention in Bitcoin treasuries

SATA is not an isolated concept. The same general idea—linking corporate capital-raising to Bitcoin treasury objectives while using preferred equity to manage dilution—has become a recognizable segment among companies that describe such structures as “digital credit,” an emerging framing that Cointelegraph has discussed previously in connection with Bitcoin-focused financing products.

Strive’s stated goal is straightforward: raise capital for its Bitcoin treasury without issuing additional common shares. For public equity holders, that can be a significant difference. Common-stock issuance can be dilutive in the near term, while preferred structures are often marketed as a way to finance growth while keeping the common share count stable.

That said, the market still has to price risk: preferred shares can be sensitive to how investors assess dividend durability, treasury management, and credit-like features tied to corporate performance. The question investors are effectively testing is whether the “variable dividend to par” design meaningfully limits downside during periods of broader risk-off sentiment.

Strategy’s STRC as a reference point

Strategy’s STRC provides a direct comparison point. Introduced in 2025 with a similar objective of maintaining a $100 share price through a variable dividend framework, STRC also fell sharply during the late-June selloff. However, it has not fully returned to par; Yahoo Finance shows STRC trading at about $87.

Advertisement

The divergence between SATA nearing par while STRC remains below it highlights an important reality: even products built on similar mechanics can experience different market trajectories depending on timing, investor expectations, and how quickly confidence returns.

Still, both examples appear to be rooted in the same investor promise—mechanical dividend adjustments supported by a treasury-focused balance sheet. If that promise continues to be validated, it could reduce the “model break” fear that emerges during drawdowns.

Market confidence and sector refinements

Speaking to Cointelegraph, Jan3 founder and CEO Samson Mow suggested that adjustments by Bitcoin treasury companies are starting to restore confidence in preferred-share products. He linked the broader improvement in this niche to ongoing efforts to strengthen balance sheets and encourage securities like STRC to move back toward par.

Mow’s core point was that market participants are looking for evidence that these structures can withstand volatility rather than requiring panic-driven repricing. In his view, when SATA returns to par, it could reinforce the argument that the overall model is functioning as intended—potentially supporting STRC’s path as well.

Advertisement

He also pointed to new entrants refining approaches to treasury management. As an example, Mow cited Lyn Alden’s Orange Juice treasury company, which launched on July 15 with plans to operate a Bitcoin treasury and with an explicit intent of running a lower Bitcoin cost basis through its own strategy.

For investors, the practical takeaway is not just that more products are appearing, but that the sector is iterating. The preferred-share idea is still young, and each cycle of stress tests can determine which variations earn durability in the eyes of the market.

Meanwhile, the underlying Bitcoin treasury competition remains a key backdrop. BitcoinTreasuries.NET data places Strive at seventh among public Bitcoin treasury companies, holding 19,921 BTC, while Strategy remains the largest with 843,775 BTC.

Going forward, traders and investors should watch whether SATA’s move near par translates into broader confidence for comparable products like STRC, and whether further treasury-linked preferred issuances continue to attract stable bids during risk-off periods. The durability of the variable-dividend-to-par mechanism—and investors’ belief in dividend resilience—will likely remain the central question.

Advertisement

Risk & affiliate notice: Crypto assets are volatile and capital is at risk. This article may contain affiliate links. Read full disclosure

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Crypto World

EU authorities include HTX exchange in Russian sanctions

Published

on

EU authorities include HTX exchange in Russian sanctions

EU authorities include HTX exchange in Russian sanctions

The exchange, already sanctioned by the UK, is now on a list of 18 entities “providing crypto-assets services or payment services“ in defiance of the EU’s measures against Russia.

Source link

Continue Reading

Crypto World

Big Tech Earnings Week is Over. Who Won and Lost?

Published

on

Price Moves Post Earnings

Big tech earnings week closed with a strange scoreboard. Most companies beat Wall Street’s estimates, yet almost every stock fell, and hundreds of billions of dollars in market value vanished in two sessions.

Price Moves Post Earnings
Price Moves Post Earnings: BeInCrypto

Four signals explain it better than the headlines. Price reaction, money flow, options positioning, and analyst revisions show who actually won the week.

Why This Big Tech Earnings Week Mattered

Seven heavyweights reported in four days. Texas Instruments opened on July 21, Alphabet, Tesla, IBM, and ServiceNow followed on July 22, and Intel and SAP closed the set on July 23.

The week doubled as the first real test of AI capital spending at scale, after earlier calls to dump tech into the reports. Investors wanted proof that record data center budgets are turning into profit.

Commentators estimated the megacap group shed $800 billion in a single day, the worst since April 2025.

Advertisement

Spending guidance now moves these stocks more than earnings do.

Who Won Big Tech Earnings Week?

Only two names left the week stronger. One won loudly on results, while the other won quietly on positioning.

Intel

Intel delivered the cleanest beat. Revenue rose 25% to $16.1 billion, its fastest growth in almost 15 years, and earnings of $0.42 per share doubled estimates. Consequently, the stock jumped more than 12% after hours.

Advertisement

Money tells a more cautious story. Chaikin Money Flow (CMF), a proxy for institutional money flow, sat at −0.13 into the print.

The Winners' Price And Money Flow
The Winners’ Price And Money Flow After Earnings: BeInCrypto

Barchart showed put/call open interest, the tally of contracts still held, at 0.96.This is a clear case of growing bearish hedging against Intel’s 0.6-0.75 baseline.

Intel Put/Call
Intel Put/Call: Barchart

Analysts lifted targets without lifting ratings. Morgan Stanley kept its Hold at $84, and JPMorgan stayed at Sell at $85, per TipRanks.

ServiceNow

ServiceNow fell 3.7% in the session after its report, which looks like a defeat. The details argue otherwise. It beat on earnings, grew subscription revenue 24.5%, and raised its outlook.

CMF slipped to −0.10, so big money has not yet confirmed a recovery.

Advertisement

However, both put/call ratios fell after the print, from 0.54 to 0.42 on volume and 0.83 to 0.80 on open interest, showing bullish buildup.

ServiceNow (NOW) Put/Call Ratio And Price
ServiceNow (NOW) Put/Call Ratio And Price: Barchart

Analysts raised targets at Bernstein and Evercore against a single KeyBanc Sell. Positioning treated the dip as an entry.

Who Lost the Week?

The losers shared one flaw, and it was not weak demand. Markets punished heavy spending harder than soft results.

The Losers' Price And Money Flow After Earnings
The Losers’ Price And Money Flow After Earnings: BeInCrypto

Tesla

Tesla failed all four tests. Earnings of $0.33 per share missed the $0.51 consensus, free cash flow turned negative, and capital spending jumped 142%. The stock fell 14.5%, its worst session in over a year, capping a tense Tesla earnings preview week.

Money confirmed the damage. CMF worsened from −0.06 to −0.12, meaning sellers pressed harder on record deliveries.

Advertisement
Tesla (TSLA) Put/Call Ratio And Price
Tesla (TSLA) Put/Call Ratio And Price: Barchart

Put volume climbed from 0.78 to 0.83 times calls, and at least six firms cut targets, including JPMorgan and UBS.

Alphabet

Alphabet posted the week’s best numbers and still lost. Alphabet’s July earnings showed revenue up 24% to $119.8 billion, with Cloud growing 82%, per CNBC. Yet management raised 2026 capital spending guidance to as much as $205 billion, and the stock dropped 7.1%.

That spending pushed quarterly free cash flow negative for the first time in over two decades, analysts noted, so shareholders are funding the AI buildout upfront.

The money left before the headlines did. CMF faded from 0.14 on July 20 to 0.03 after the report, so institutional buyers were stepping back all week. Analysts kept Buy ratings while JPMorgan, Piper Sandler, and UBS cut targets, and open interest edged up from 0.68 to 0.70.


Alphabet (GOOGL) Put/Call Ratio And Price
Alphabet (GOOGL) Put/Call Ratio And Price: Barchart

Investors who had priced big earnings swings got exactly that, weeks after AI spending faced scrutiny.

Three Stocks Ended the Week Neutral

Three names finished in between, with signals pointing in opposite directions. That tension makes them the ones to watch.

The Neutral Zone Price And Money Flow
The Neutral Zone Price And Money Flow: BeInCrypto

Texas Instruments: The week’s broadest analyst raises, with JPMorgan going to $340, could not stop put volume doubling from 0.38 to 0.76.

TXN Put-Call Ratio
TXN Put-Call Ratio: Barchart

Yet CMF improved to −0.03, so buyers absorbed the profit-taking dip. A mixed reaction, indeed.

IBM: It missed, cut guidance, and took the sharpest target cuts, including Morgan Stanley’s move to $190. Still, the stock closed green and CMF improved to −0.09, because the July 14 crash of 25% had already priced the pain.

IBM (IBM) Put/Call Ratio And Price
IBM (IBM) Put/Call Ratio And Price: Barchart

The Put-Call ratio remains bullish.

Moreover, several Wall Street analysts still hold higher targets. Jefferies even assigned a post-result Buy.

Advertisement
Analyst Price Targets
Analyst Price Targets: TipRanks

SAP: Earnings on its American Depositary Receipt (ADR), the US-listed version of the German stock, missed while cloud backlog grew 27%.

Put volume collapsed from 1.99 to 0.60 as speculators exited, yet hedges rose to 1.10.

SAP (SAP) Put/Call Ratio And Price
SAP (SAP) Put/Call Ratio And Price: Barchart

Here are all the key analyst targets, sourced directly from TipRanks.

Post-Earnings Analyst Price Target Changes
Post-Earnings Analyst Price Target Changes: BeInCrypto, Data From TipRanks

The pattern from big tech earnings week is hard to miss.

Big Tech Earnings Week Four-Factor Scorecard: BeInCrypto
Big Tech Earnings Week Four-Factor Scorecard: BeInCrypto

Markets now reward companies that collect AI spending and punish those that write the checks. The week ahead will show whether money flow and fresh options data confirm Intel as the week’s loudest winner.

The post Big Tech Earnings Week is Over. Who Won and Lost? appeared first on BeInCrypto.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Crypto World

Ethereum Bear Market Bottom Is In: Analyst Eyes $7K Long-Term

Published

on

Pseudonymous crypto trader NoName says Ethereum has just crossed into the price zone where its bear market has historically bottomed, pointing to four straight lower highs as proof the downtrend has run its course.

The trader, who is buying through the dip with a long-term target of $7,000, argues that the same crowd psychology that made ETH everyone’s favorite trade at $4,900 is now working against it below $2,000.

Mapping Out the Bottom Zone

In a post shared Friday, NoName laid out Ethereum’s decline through four descending peaks: $4,957, then $3,400, then $2,460, then $1,950, calling it a textbook downtrend. Each top landed lower than the one before it, and the trader said that sequence has now pushed price into the $1,300 to $1,900 range, the zone treated as the eventual floor.

The reasoning is less technical than psychological, with the analyst noting that ETH at $4,900 was a favorite while ETH under $2,000 gets called a dead chain, even though nothing about the network changed. “That’s not logic, that’s psychology, and psychology marks bottoms,” NoName wrote, adding that the climb back up will likely be rough.

Advertisement

Other signals moved the same day, including a bullish crossover in ETH’s MVRV ratio against its 160-day moving average as pointed out by chartist Ali Martinez. That setup has come right before several major recoveries in the past by marking the end of distribution phases.

Meanwhile, Arab Chain reported that Ethereum’s 30-day funding rate average on Binance climbed roughly 0.00339, its highest reading in six months, with ETH trading near $1,920 at the time, a sign of improving sentiment though not yet at levels tied to past corrections.

The world’s second-largest cryptocurrency was itself changing hands just below $1,900 at the time of writing, per CoinGecko data, up close to 12% over the past month but still 62% below the $4,946 all-time high it hit last August. The token slipped from a seven-week high near $1,950 earlier this week and needs to reclaim $2,000 to build any further push.

Not Everyone Is Convinced the Bottom Is In

CryptoQuant struck a more cautious note on Thursday, noting that ETH was trading roughly 17% below its realized price but that only two of five bottom-signal metrics it tracks have reached historical extremes. “Capitulation is still missing,” the platform said.

Advertisement

Whale buying has continued regardless. Lookonchain tracked a wallet purchasing 27,000 ETH worth $52 million through Galaxy Digital’s OTC desk, and Arthur Hayes, whose BitMEX exchange recently announced it will be shutting down in September, added another 644 ETH, bringing his total over eight days to 3,270 ETH.

At the same time, spot Ethereum ETFs have pulled in over $408 million this month, and Kalshi traders are pricing ETH near $3,200 by year’s end.

But not every path lines up with NoName’s. Analyst Nonzee expects one more rally toward $2,000, or $2,200 if Bitcoin climbs to $70,000, but calls that level a bull trap rather than a real breakout, with a drop toward $900 to $1,300 still likely first. His long-term target, though, lands in the same place as NoName’s: $7,000.

The post Ethereum Bear Market Bottom Is In: Analyst Eyes $7K Long-Term appeared first on CryptoPotato.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2025