Connect with us
DAPA Banner
DAPA Coin
DAPA
COIN PAYMENT ASSET
PRIVACY · BLOCKDAG · HOMOMORPHIC ENCRYPTION · RUST
ElGamal Encrypted MINE DAPA
🚫 GENESIS SOLD OUT
DAPAPAY COMING

Crypto World

Kash Patel ‘spiderkash’ leak triggers dozens of Solana memecoin scams

Published

on

Kash Patel 'spiderkash' leak triggers dozens of Solana memecoin scams

Dozens of Kash Patel-themed tokens appeared on memecoin launchpad Pump Fun this weekend, after Iranian hackers leaked his personal email along with a burner username that some believe has been used to comment on pornographic videos.

The Iranian government-linked collective published over 300 emails, personal photos, and a resume from Patel’s Gmail account on Friday.

Among the leaked details was an alias, “spiderkash,” that Patel used with a burner email. Researchers searched for exact matches for that handle across the internet and found a profile on XVideos, a pornography website.

Spiderkash created its porn account on January 5, 2020 to review and leave comments on adult videos.

Advertisement

While it’s not been confirmed that the account actually belongs to Patel, crypto promoters believed they had enough evidence with the exact character match.

No official statement has confirmed or denied the connection, and there’s little reason for Patel to clarify.

Nevertheless, screenshots spread across X within hours, racking up millions of views and the profile soon became restricted.

Read more: Research finds less than 0.002% of Pump.fun memecoins succeed

Advertisement

Dozens of Kash Patel porn memecoins, one outcome

Within hours of Patel’s email leak, dozens of promoters created memecoins bearing the Spiderkash username appeared on Pump Fun.

One token named after Patel’s actual leaked email address, [email protected], peaked within one minute of launch before crashing 87% five minutes later and never recovering.

The largest by market cap spiked to a $104,000 value within hours of launch. However, one hour after its peak, it had collapsed 70%.

Within 12 hours it was 87% off its peak and by Saturday night, peak-to-trough losses exceeded 90%.

Advertisement

A third Spiderkash-inspired memecoin called Mayhem reached $5,500 before falling 85% to just $818 within seconds. it never recovered. 

One Pump Fun wallet deployed four Spiderkash tokens in the same hour. Each remained at Pump Fun’s starting market cap and, despite illiquid wicks to high prices, never attracted any meaningful trading.

Dozens were trading 90% below their momentary all-time highs.

Iranian hackers previously targeted Patel in December 2024, before his confirmation as FBI director, claiming that the breach was retaliation for the DOJ seizing several of its websites on March 19.

Advertisement

Got a tip? Send us an email securely via Protos Leaks. For more informed news, follow us on X, Bluesky, and Google News, or subscribe to our YouTube channel.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

Crypto World

Nvidia, Meta, Walmart among top companies adopting AI

Published

on

Nvidia, Meta and Schlumberger rank among top companies adopting AI, new study says
Nvidia, Meta and Schlumberger rank among top companies adopting AI, new study says

Seemingly every company is obsessed with artificial intelligence these days, whether it’s how the technology is transforming their industry or the effects it’s having on employees and customers.

But the degree to which companies are utilizing AI tools internally and adapting to a rapidly changing reality varies dramatically. A new study from AI-Driven Enterprise Institute (AIDE) breaks down how well S&P 500 companies — and their leaders — are adopting AI compared to their peers.

The top performers, unsurprisingly, are centered in the tech industry, according to the data, which was shared with CNBC. In looking at four areas — literacy, advocacy, orientation and implementation — AIDE gave each company a score of up to 100 in the four categories and then provided an overall index score.

In technology, the highest company score (the average of the orientation and implementation pillars) and the only 100, went to chipmaker Nvidia, which has become the world’s largest company by selling the chips and systems that have powered the development of AI models and services. Meta and Amazon also scored 100, but in the S&P 500, those companies are considered communication services and consumer discretionary names, respectively.

Advertisement

The only other 100 company score went to energy producer SLB, formerly Schlumberger. The next highest scorer was retailer Walmart, followed by AES and NextEra Energy, which are both classified as utilities.

The new open-source index draws from publicly available data like earnings call transcripts, job openings and patent applications to measure how much executives know and say about AI, as well as how much their companies are prioritizing the technology and bringing it into daily operations.

The data doesn’t measure whether AI is driving financial returns, but it’s meant to give leaders an objective way to compare their strategy to their peers without relying on self-reported surveys, said Paul Cheek, AIDE’s CEO and a senior lecturer at Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

“When a board asks a CEO — ‘How are we doing compared to our peer group?’ — I don’t want it to be speculative,” Cheek said in an interview. “I want there to be some data that they can use to back up what they have to share.”

Advertisement

Cheek said there’s “significant room for improvement” for board members and executives to increase their own AI literacy, adding that boards need to better understand AI “as it relates to the ability to manage risk and strategic investments in the organizations that create value for all of us.”

Here are the the 20 companies with the top company scores, based on their “orientation” and “implementation” scores:

  1. Nvidia (100)
  2. Schlumberger (100)
  3. Amazon (100)
  4. Meta (100)
  5. Walmart (95.84)
  6. AES (95.46)
  7. NextEra Energy (95.44)
  8. Ecolab (95)
  9. Digital Realty (94.74)
  10. Chevron (94.74)
  11. Alphabet (94.72)
  12. Equinix (94.59)
  13. IQVIA (93.75)
  14. Dow (93.34)
  15. Halliburton (92.83)
  16. Broadridge Financial Solutions (91.66)
  17. Microsoft (91.37)
  18. Block (90.91)
  19. Duke Energy (90.91)
  20. PepsiCo (90.62)

These companies were at the top of their sector based on the “AIDE Index”:

WATCH: Meta reshapes workforce as AI disrupts entry level hiring

Meta reshapes workforce as AI disrupts entry level hiring
Choose CNBC as your preferred source on Google and never miss a moment from the most trusted name in business news.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Crypto World

Humanity (H) Surges 65% to Record High on AI Token Rally

Published

on

Humanity (H) Surges 65% to Record High on AI Token Rally

Humanity (H) price jumped more than 65% over the past 24 hours, pushing past $0.65 and setting a new all-time high above $0.68. The move added the token to a wider AI-themed rally sweeping crypto markets on June 1.

H now trades around $0.65 with a market cap of $1.18 billion, ranking 65th by capitalization. The token has gained 172% over the past week and roughly 237% over the past 30 days, based on current market data.

AI Sector Rally Lifts H Alongside Worldcoin and FET

The H rally fits inside a broader AI token move that pushed Humanity, Worldcoin (WLD), Fetch.ai (FET), and Venice Token (VVV) into the day’s top gainers list. Funds rotated into AI-linked tokens as risk appetite improved across equities.

Falling bond yields, softer oil prices, and renewed enthusiasm around upcoming AI-related tech IPOs added fuel to the speculative bid. The sector has tracked the strength of large-cap AI equities over the past 24 hours.

Advertisement

No project-specific catalyst surfaced from Humanity Protocol’s official channels. The move looks driven by sector rotation rather than a discrete announcement such as a listing or protocol upgrade.

Weekly Chart Shifts Into Price Discovery

H has broken cleanly above its October 2025 record high and now trades in price discovery on the weekly timeframe. The weekly Relative Strength Index (RSI) sits at 84, deep inside overbought-bullish territory.

The first two Fibonacci extension targets at 1.272 and 1.618 have already been printed. Price reached both during the current weekly candle, leaving the next upside zones open.


H weekly chart
H weekly chart / Source: Tradingview

The 2.0 Fibonacci extension sits at $0.75, with the 2.618 target near $0.97. Both align with measured-move logic from the breakout structure.

On the downside, the 0.786 Fibonacci retracement at $0.32 marks the strongest visible support if the rally cools.

Advertisement

Daily Broadening Pattern Drives Volatility Expansion

The daily chart shows H trading inside a broadening formation that has produced higher highs and higher lows since mid-April 2026. The structure widens as price advances, a classic late-stage trend signature.

A roughly three-week reaccumulation phase from May 10 to the end of May built the platform for the current expansion. Price traded inside a tight range before the breakout fired.

H daily chart / Source: Tradingview

Bollinger Band Width Percentile (BBWP) has flashed red over the past three sessions. The reading marks an extreme volatility regime and historically precedes either continuation spikes or sharp mean-reversion candles.

If sellers force a pullback, the next higher low projection sits near $0.43. That level would preserve the broadening structure on the daily timeframe.

Social Volume Spikes as Attention Floods H

Santiment data shows Humanity’s Social Volume and Social Dominance both climbing into the rally. The H/USD line accelerated steeply while social mentions hit their highest readings of the past three months.

Advertisement

Social Dominance reached 0.071, signaling that H captured an outsized share of crypto conversations relative to its market cap. Sentiment-tracking accounts on X assigned the token a 9 of 10 bullish confidence score.

H social volume / Source: Santiment

Larger commentators have framed H as a top performer across the majors and highlighted its move past the $1 billion market cap line. That kind of attention tends to pull in short-term momentum traders and breakout chasers, much like the recent move in Worldcoin.

Humanity (H) Price Prediction Levels to Watch

The bullish path keeps H pointed at the 2.0 Fibonacci extension at $0.75 and the 2.618 extension near $0.97. Both targets sit within the current price discovery zone.

A failure to hold the daily structure shifts focus to the $0.43 higher-low projection. A deeper retracement would test the 0.786 Fibonacci support at $0.32, where buyers defended the prior breakout base.

The rally still lacks a discrete fundamental catalyst, which leaves the trade dependent on AI sector flows and chart-driven demand. Traders looking further out can weigh longer-term Humanity forecast scenarios alongside the live structure.

Advertisement

Whether H sustains its breakout depends on whether sector momentum and social attention hold firm through the next few daily candles.

The post Humanity (H) Surges 65% to Record High on AI Token Rally appeared first on BeInCrypto.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Crypto World

Bitcoin ETPs face worst 2026 outflow as $1.67B leaves crypto funds: CoinShares

Published

on

Source: CoinShares

Crypto investment products recorded $1.67 billion in outflows last week, extending their losing streak to three weeks as Bitcoin funds saw their largest exit of 2026.

Summary

  • Crypto ETPs recorded $1.67 billion in outflows, extending losses to three straight weeks globally now.
  • Bitcoin funds led the selling with $1.44 billion withdrawn, their largest weekly outflow of 2026.
  • XRP, Hyperliquid and Near attracted inflows, but altcoin participation narrowed sharply across markets last week.

Digital asset exchange-traded products posted their second-largest weekly withdrawal of 2026, according to CoinShares. The latest pullback took three-week outflows to $4.21 billion.

Total assets under management fell to $141 billion, the lowest level since early April. The data shows weaker demand from institutional investors after several weeks of pressure across crypto markets.

Advertisement

“The pattern is reminiscent of the January-February episode that delivered five consecutive negative weeks,” CoinShares head of research James Butterfill said.

Butterfill linked the selling to an Iran-related risk-off move that outweighed any support from progress around the CLARITY Act. The report said the pullback remained concentrated in major crypto investment products.

Bitcoin leads weekly selling

Bitcoin ETPs recorded $1.44 billion in outflows, the largest weekly Bitcoin withdrawal so far in 2026. Bitcoin products were down $2.4 billion month-to-date.

The asset still had about $1.2 billion in year-to-date inflows. Bitcoin fund assets under management fell to $114.6 billion after the latest withdrawals.

Advertisement
Source: CoinShares
Source: CoinShares

Ether products also stayed under pressure. ETH funds lost $257.3 million during the week, taking year-to-date outflows to $346 million.

Altcoin demand narrowed sharply. CoinShares said only five assets posted inflows above $1 million, down from nine assets a week earlier.

U.S. products drive global exits

The United States accounted for most of the selling, with $1.63 billion in outflows. That matched heavy withdrawals from U.S.-listed spot Bitcoin ETFs during the same period.

Germany recorded $25.7 million in outflows. Sweden and Hong Kong also saw withdrawals, while the Netherlands was the only market with inflows above $1 million.

XRP led the few positive assets with $20.3 million in inflows. Hyperliquid followed with $10.8 million, while Near added $7.6 million.

Advertisement

This showed that some investors still targeted selected altcoin products. However, the broader market remained tilted toward exits.

Earlier inflows give wider context

As previously reported by crypto.news, crypto ETFs saw strong inflows in April, with Bitcoin, Ethereum, and XRP products attracting fresh capital. That earlier rebound has now weakened.

Separate earlier coverage also showed crypto investment products drawing more than $1 billion in weekly inflows in March, when Bitcoin and Ethereum led demand.

The latest CoinShares data marks a clear change from that earlier buying. Bitcoin now accounts for most of the pressure, while Ether funds and several regional markets also remain weak.

Advertisement

The next weekly fund flow report will show whether the outflow streak extends toward the five-week pattern seen earlier this year or whether demand returns after the latest sell-off.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Crypto World

Major Crypto Exchange Coinbase Enables Rupee Bank Rails in India

Published

on

Major Crypto Exchange Coinbase Enables Rupee Bank Rails in India

Coinbase has enabled direct rupee bank rails in India, making it easier for local customers to move money between bank accounts and crypto markets on the exchange as the company deepens its push into one of the world’s fastest-growing digital asset markets.

Indian users can now deposit and withdraw Indian rupees via the Immediate Payment Service (IMPS) instant payments network and access spot markets, perpetual futures and the company’s Advanced Trade interface through a single platform, according to a company blog post published Sunday.

The move marks Coinbase’s latest push to expand its presence in India since a troubled 2022 debut and follows the company’s registration with India’s Financial Intelligence Unit, giving it a formal regulatory footing in the market.

In 2022, Coinbase briefly supported Unified Payments Interface (UPI)-based rupee deposits before halting them days after launch, after payments authorities distanced themselves from crypto use of the network and partners stopped enabling UPI for the exchange.

Advertisement

Related: Coinbase brings global crypto derivatives markets to US institutional clients

Coinbase registered with India’s Financial Intelligence Unit in March 2025, a step the company said enables it to offer crypto trading services in India under the country’s Anti-Money-Laundering (AML) framework.

India first in global crypto adoption index

Coinbase is wading into a crowded but strategically important arena, where domestic platforms such as CoinDCX, CoinSwitch, ZebPay and WazirX already serve Indian traders.

Chainalysis Global Crypto Adoption Index, 2025. Source: Chainalysis

Global exchanges such as Binance and KuCoin are also widely used, but have largely relied on crypto-only or peer-to-peer rupee access, rather than the kind of direct, IMPS-based bank rails Coinbase is now offering.

Advertisement

With rupee deposits and withdrawals now live, Coinbase is providing Indian users direct bank-to-crypto transfers in addition to spot trading, perpetual futures and its Advanced Trade platform, and says it has built local INR order books for concentrated domestic liquidity alongside access to its global exchange.

India has emerged as a key prize for global exchanges despite policy headwinds, including a 30% tax on many digital asset gains and a 1% tax deducted at source on certain transactions.

Chainalysis ranked India first in its 2025 Global Crypto Adoption Index, ahead of 150 other countries, based on factors such as retail onchain activity, use of centralized exchanges and decentralized finance protocols, and transaction volumes, illustrating the scale of grassroots usage that platforms like Coinbase are trying to tap.

Magazine: Guide to the top and emerging global crypto hubs — Mid-2026

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Crypto World

Low bitcoin-software correlation suggests a major move may be approaching

Published

on

Low bitcoin-software correlation suggests a major move may be approaching

Bitcoin and software stocks moved almost in lockstep for much of the past five years, with BTC treated as a high-beta technology asset.

The iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF (IGV) served as one of the best proxies for the software sector. That relationship, however, appears to have broken down.

Since May 14, bitcoin and IGV have sharply diverged. IGV has gained roughly 12%, while bitcoin has fallen about 10%, marking one of the largest disconnects between the two assets in recent years.

Bitcoin and IGV reached all-time highs in October 2025 before entering significant drawdowns, with bitcoin declining roughly 50%, while IGV around 37%. The software sector’s weakness was largely driven by growing fears that artificial intelligence would disrupt traditional software business models. The “SaaS apocalypse” narrative gained traction across markets, triggering broad selling pressure in software names such as Oracle (ORCL), Microsoft (MSFT), and Palantir (PLTR).

Advertisement

IGV has staged an impressive recovery since early April, rallying 36% and reclaiming its 200-day moving average, a technical indicator that represents the average closing price over the previous 200 trading days and is often used to gauge a long-term trend. IGV closed on Friday near 98 and was trading around 104 in pre-market action Monday.

Bitcoin, by contrast, is trading near $73,000, nearly 10% lower than its 200-day moving average of $79,388.

The 20-day rolling correlation between bitcoin and IGV has fallen to 0.58. The last notable periods of similarly low correlation occurred in October 2023, when bitcoin was trading near $25,000 before rallying to $70,000 over the following six months, and again during the summer of 2024, shortly before bitcoin surged toward $100,000 following President Trump’s election victory.

Historically, such periods of low correlation have not lasted long. Either bitcoin eventually catches up to software stocks, or IGV’s recovery proves a fakeout. For now, the latter scenario appears less likely given IGV’s strong momentum and its move back above the 200-day moving average.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Crypto World

How Smart Contract Security Improvements Are Strengthening Online Game Platforms

Published

on

Brian Armstrong's Bold Prediction: AI Agents Will Soon Dominate Global Financial

Smart contract technology is transforming online gaming by enabling trustless, transparent interactions between players and platforms. Recent advances in smart contract security are addressing longstanding vulnerabilities, supporting a more reliable experience for users. As both traditional gamers and fans of the social casino experience and sweepstakes-style entertainment explore blockchain-enabled platforms, robust smart contract protections are emerging as a crucial foundation for platform integrity and security.

Online game platforms, particularly those centered on blockchain and digital assets, now view security as a defining factor in building trust among developers, platform operators, and players, including how promotional mechanics like no deposit bonus codes are enforced through automated reward logic. In an increasingly competitive environment, many end users and operators recognize how flaws in smart contract logic can be exploited, resulting in disrupted gameplay, compromised fairness, or reputational harm. Questions such as, “How do promotions remain fair and transparent?” are common, and blockchain-based mechanisms aim to automate rewards distribution in accordance with published terms. Code-based security forms the infrastructure for modern digital entertainment, making robust protections essential.

As more free-to-play casino-style games and sweepstakes-style entertainment platforms embrace blockchain for fairness and transparency, smart contract protections can impact how incentives and rewards are managed. What does this mean for players? It typically means that both gameplay and daily rewards or bonus coins are distributed based on rules visible to everyone, increasing trust. To understand the value of trust, one must look at both transparent mechanics on the platform and the underlying automated systems that help secure gameplay integrity.

How Smart Contracts Underpin Gaming Ecosystem Logic

Smart contracts are self-executing programs that automate actions based on rules defined by platform developers. In online gaming environments, they often manage digital assets, enforce access controls, distribute rewards, and operate in-game marketplaces. What specific benefits do these contracts provide? For many platforms, the answer lies in consistent rule enforcement and minimizing the risk of human error or manipulation.

Advertisement

Reward distribution through smart contracts remains central to numerous gaming platforms, particularly those hosting player-versus-player contests, tournaments, or daily prize systems. By operating on-chain, smart contracts help ensure outcomes and payouts follow transparent rules, reducing manual intervention and the risk of operator bias. For users seeking a fair social casino experience, this transparency is often considered a core benefit of blockchain-mediated play.

Digital asset issuance is another area where smart contracts offer clear value. Many blockchain-enabled games allow players to earn, trade, or upgrade items as non-fungible tokens (NFTs) and in-game currencies. Smart contracts define the rules for ownership, transfer, and scarcity of assets, which supports the stability and predictability of these items within the ecosystem.

For access control and permissioning, smart contracts manage eligibility for games, tournaments, or events. This becomes particularly important for sweepstakes-style entertainment platforms, where participants’ eligibility may depend on location, activity history, or reaching certain in-game milestones. Users frequently ask, “How do platforms verify eligibility in sweepstakes scenarios?” The answer is that eligibility logic is often automated and verifiable through these smart contracts.

Deployment models for smart contracts can vary. Fully on-chain platforms process game logic and settle outcomes directly on the blockchain, which tends to maximize transparency but can affect performance. Hybrid solutions, where core outcomes settle on-chain and gameplay occurs off-chain, attempt to balance transparency and user experience.

Advertisement

Custodial models, in which some control remains with the platform but ownership or settlement is verifiable on-chain, are also common. In each model, ongoing security improvements aim to lower the chances of contract logic flaws negatively affecting gameplay, outcomes, or bonus rewards for players.

Beyond basic functionality, smart contracts enable sophisticated game mechanics that were previously difficult to implement with traditional server-based systems. Provably fair algorithms, for instance, allow players to independently verify that game outcomes were not manipulated after the fact. This cryptographic proof mechanism has become particularly valued in competitive gaming scenarios where prize pools are significant. Additionally, smart contracts facilitate player-to-player transactions without requiring platform intermediaries, reducing fees and settlement times. Many modern gaming platforms now leverage these contracts to create dynamic economies where supply and demand naturally regulate item values, creating more engaging and realistic virtual marketplaces that respond to actual player behavior and preferences.

The evolution of smart contract standards has also enabled interoperability between different gaming platforms and ecosystems. Standardized token interfaces allow digital assets earned in one game to potentially be recognized or utilized in another, creating interconnected gaming experiences that transcend individual platform boundaries. This cross-platform compatibility is particularly valuable for players who invest time and resources across multiple games, as it preserves asset value and utility beyond single-game lifecycles. Layer-2 scaling solutions have further enhanced smart contract capabilities by enabling faster transaction processing and lower fees while maintaining the security guarantees of underlying blockchains. These technological advances allow gaming platforms to support thousands of concurrent players and complex real-time interactions that would be prohibitively expensive on base-layer blockchains. As smart contract infrastructure continues to mature, developers gain access to increasingly sophisticated tools for creating immersive, economically sustainable gaming environments that balance decentralization with practical performance requirements.

Understanding Vulnerabilities Unique to Gaming Smart Contracts

Smart contracts offer significant benefits, but they also introduce unique vulnerabilities that can impact gaming platforms. Reentrancy attacks—where a contract is tricked into calling an external contract that then calls back into the original—have been highly publicized for enabling malicious actors to disrupt balances or logic mid-execution.

Advertisement

Weaknesses in access control are also widespread threats. If contract permissions are not precisely defined, unauthorized parties can sometimes assume critical roles, minting in-game assets or extracting platform funds. This is why routine security assessments are advised for both social casino and sweepstakes casino platforms to minimize such risks.

Games that use outside data sources, such as oracles for price feeds or event results, can be exposed if the oracle mechanism is insecure. Questions about how oracles influence game outcomes are common among users, and the answer is that robust oracle design is crucial to ensure integrity. Attackers may attempt to manipulate data sources, resulting in distorted or unintended contract behavior.

Other vulnerabilities include calculation errors, such as integer overflow, and issues with upgradeable contract frameworks. Contracts that mishandle calculations can sometimes produce unpredictable bonus coin rewards or item quantities, disrupting the intended gameplay experience. For platforms prioritizing a consistent social casino experience, this kind of unpredictability can impact user trust.

Upgradeability is often necessary for platforms, but if not carefully managed via multisignature confirmations, time delays, or audit logs, upgrade features may become a vector for unauthorized control or malicious changes. Predictable or insufficiently protected randomness mechanisms, often used in game outcomes, also represent a threat to fairness if not managed well.

Advertisement

Further risks arise with cross-chain bridges in multi-network gaming platforms. If implemented without careful validation and monitoring, these systems can potentially expose users’ assets to attacks across both connected blockchains.

Time-dependent vulnerabilities present another category of risk that gaming platforms must address carefully. Smart contracts that rely on block timestamps for critical decisions can potentially be influenced by miners who have limited ability to manipulate these values within certain ranges. This becomes especially problematic in time-sensitive gaming scenarios such as tournament deadlines, auction endings, or time-locked reward releases. Front-running attacks, where observers monitor pending transactions and submit their own with higher fees to execute first, can also disrupt fair gameplay in competitive environments. Gas limit issues may cause complex game state updates to fail unpredictably, potentially leaving players in inconsistent states. These technical challenges require developers to implement defensive coding practices and consider economic incentives that might motivate malicious behavior, ensuring that contract logic remains robust even under adversarial conditions.

Modern Security Practices Transforming Contract Protection

The industry has sharpened its technical and operational standards to address these challenges. Automated auditing tools scan code for common flaws and ensure that smart contracts adhere to best-practice security patterns. Users often ask, “How can I trust that a platform’s smart contracts are safe?” Regular audits and transparency measures help to answer this concern.

Formal verification offers additional rigor by mathematically checking contract logic against expected behaviors in various scenarios. Tools for invariant testing and fuzzing help developers uncover edge cases that could cause issues during live gameplay, supporting safer code ahead of platform launches involving free-to-play casino-style games.

Advertisement

Secure contract design patterns—such as checks-effects-interactions and robust access control—reduce the risk of attacks by narrowing the functions that external parties can access. Modular and role-based permissioning structures further improve security and are often used in building a trustworthy social casino experience.

Improved upgrade procedures feature governance layers, timelocks, and multisignature approvals, ensuring that updates occur only with sufficient oversight. Transparent logs allow players and third-party auditors to track and review all smart contract modifications, enhancing trust and platform accountability.

Visible change histories and immutable records provide another layer of openness, letting all participants confirm when and how important updates take place. For platforms that offer daily rewards and bonus coins or rely on sweepstakes-style entertainment, solid contract templates make it harder for distributions to be changed in ways that run contrary to players’ expectations.

As randomized events and daily rewards continue to grow popular, third-party code reviews and open security disclosures are typically considered minimum requirements for trust. These practices enhance reliability on platforms delivering a modern social casino experience intertwined with blockchain automation.

Advertisement

Bug bounty programs have emerged as a powerful complement to traditional security audits, incentivizing external security researchers to identify and responsibly disclose vulnerabilities before malicious actors can exploit them. Leading gaming platforms now allocate substantial rewards for critical findings, creating a collaborative security ecosystem where skilled researchers actively contribute to platform safety. Continuous integration and deployment pipelines increasingly incorporate automated security checks at every stage of development, preventing vulnerable code from reaching production environments. Simulation environments that mirror live blockchain conditions allow developers to stress-test contracts under realistic attack scenarios without risking actual user assets. These layered security approaches recognize that no single method provides complete protection, and that defense-in-depth strategies combining multiple complementary techniques offer the most reliable safeguards for platforms handling valuable digital assets and maintaining player trust.

Defensive Operations That Safeguard Platform Integrity

In addition to technical controls, daily operational procedures are instrumental in maintaining both platform and user asset security. Multisignature controls—which require agreement from several trusted parties before executing sensitive actions—reduce the risk of harm from single-person compromises.

Hardware security modules and strong key management practices are regularly used to protect access to administrative features or control high-value digital assets. When users wonder, “What happens if suspicious activity is detected?”, most leading operators maintain incident response protocols designed to pause compromised features and limit potential losses fast.

Continuous on-chain monitoring is another important defense tactic. Platforms often apply analytics and real-time alerts to quickly identify abnormal activity patterns. These tools are especially relevant within the social casino and sweepstakes casino sectors, where rapid detection helps protect daily rewards and the fairness of ongoing events.

Advertisement

Thorough post-incident analysis strengthens platform resilience by pinpointing what worked and what failed following a security incident. In the gaming sector, these lessons support ongoing trust, especially when disruptions could affect distribution of daily rewards, bonus coins, or influence fairness in sweepstakes-style entertainment.

Emergency pause mechanisms represent a critical operational safeguard that allows platforms to temporarily halt contract functionality when suspicious activity is detected or vulnerabilities are discovered. These circuit breakers must be carefully designed to prevent abuse while remaining accessible during genuine emergencies, often requiring consensus from multiple trusted parties before activation. Regular security drills and tabletop exercises help operational teams prepare for various incident scenarios, ensuring rapid and coordinated responses when real threats emerge. Insurance protocols and reserve funds provide additional financial protection, allowing platforms to compensate affected users even when technical safeguards fail

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Crypto World

Senator Lummis Warned That Stalling the CLARITY Act Now Means No Crypto Regulation Until 2030

Published

on

btc logo

Senator Cynthia Lummis has issued a direct warning: stall the CLARITY Act now, and the U.S. effectively forfeits comprehensive crypto regulation until 2030.

The logic is mechanical: if the bill fails to clear the Senate in the current legislative session, the 2026 election calendar compresses available floor time to near zero, and the next realistic window for a full market-structure framework doesn’t open until the following Congress at the earliest.

For institutional capital, that timeline is not a political abstraction. It is an operational constraint that compliance teams at major asset managers and trading desks are already pricing into deployment decisions, and increasingly resolving in favor of jurisdictions that already have answers.

The U.S. has governed digital assets primarily through regulatory enforcement, using SEC litigation, CFTC actions, and agency guidance rather than statutes to define what is and is not permissible in crypto markets.

The SEC’s enforcement docket has functioned as de facto rulemaking since at least 2017, from the DAO Report through ICO crackdowns to the Ripple and Coinbase litigation.

Enforcement-based precedent creates asymmetric uncertainty: firms know what has been penalized after the fact, but cannot get prospective clarity on what is permitted.

That asymmetry is tolerable for crypto-native firms operating at the margin; it is categorically unacceptable for compliance departments at BlackRock, Fidelity, or JPMorgan.

Advertisement

A four-to-five year extension of that regime, the operational meaning of a 2030 deadline, does not merely delay U.S. institutional adoption.

It hard-codes rival jurisdictions as the default venue for compliant tokenization, stablecoin issuance, and institutional DeFi infrastructure during the period when those markets are being built.

Bitcoin (BTC)
24h7d30d1yAll time

Discover: The Best Crypto to Diversify Your Portfolio

Institutional Capital Needs Legal Certainty Before It Moves

Advertisement

The transmission mechanism from regulatory freeze to capital migration is straightforward. Without a statutory framework resolving the SEC/CFTC jurisdictional split, compliance teams at institutional desks cannot approve crypto trading operations under existing bank-grade internal policy.

Without approved trading desks, custody arrangements cannot be structured to meet fiduciary standards. Without compliant custody, institutional liquidity، the kind that moves markets and anchors spread compression, does not flow into U.S. spot venues.

That liquidity goes somewhere. The EU’s MiCA (Markets in Crypto-Assets) regulation was adopted in 2023 and entered full force in 2024, with application to crypto-asset service providers and stablecoin issuers completed by 2025.

MiCA provides a passporting framework across all 27 EU member states، a single licensing path that gives institutional desks the prospective certainty that U.S. statute currently cannot.

Singapore’s MAS regime, operating under the 2019 Payment Services Act, has already attracted tokenization pilots with JPMorgan, DBS, and Temasek through Project Guardian, pulling institutional liquidity into Asia.

Dubai’s VARA regime has drawn Binance, OKX, and Bybit as those exchanges scaled back or restructured U.S. operations under enforcement pressure.

Polymarket and similar prediction platforms have assigned mid-50s to high-50s percentage odds that a federal market-structure bill like the CLARITY Act becomes law by end of 2026، a coin-flip probability that macro funds are actively hedging via CME bitcoin and ether futures and offshore perpetuals, shifting liquidity from U.S. spot venues to derivatives venues in Europe and Asia.

Advertisement

The CLARITY Act’s impact on liquidity markets is already being priced before the bill has passed.

What Stalling the CLARITY Act Actually Means Structurally

The CLARITY Act’s core architecture addresses the precise ambiguity that has made U.S. crypto compliance untenable for institutional actors.

The bill establishes a jurisdictional split between the SEC and CFTC based on whether a digital asset functions as a security or a commodity, creates a decentralization certification pathway that allows assets to graduate from securities treatment as their networks mature, and includes consumer protection provisions governing asset segregation in the event of exchange insolvency.

Advertisement

The bill cleared committee with a 15-9 vote، close enough to signal real opposition, but sufficient to advance.

Photo: Banking Senate

Lummis’s warning is that the committee’s result is irrelevant if floor time disappears. Without those statutory provisions, the operative question of whether a given token is a security remains resolved only through litigation outcome، meaning each institutional actor must either absorb legal risk or abstain. Most abstain.

Jamie Dimon has argued publicly for bank-like capital and AML standards for stablecoin issuers, warning that lighter treatment creates regulatory arbitrage with the banking system.

That concern is legitimate regardless of one’s view on the CLARITY Act، but it underscores that even TradFi actors who want tighter rules need a statutory vehicle to work from.

The Financial Stability Board finalized global crypto policy recommendations in 2023; the EU and Asian regulators are implementing them. U.S. Congress has not yet provided the equivalent foundation.

Advertisement

Discover: The Best Token Presales

The post Senator Lummis Warned That Stalling the CLARITY Act Now Means No Crypto Regulation Until 2030 appeared first on Cryptonews.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Crypto World

OCTOPUS (UK) leads the way

Published

on

Unlocking crypto rewards via smart contracts: OCTOPUS (UK) leads the way - 5

Disclosure: This article does not represent investment advice. The content and materials featured on this page are for educational purposes only.

OCTOPUS (UK) gains attention with a smart contract-based crypto reward unlocking mechanism for blockchain users.

Advertisement

Summary

  • OCTOPUS (UK) uses smart contracts to automate crypto reward distribution through a transparent, fully on-chain system.
  • The platform supports governance, liquidity mining, NFTs, and multi-stage task rewards designed to increase user engagement.
  • Features such as time-lock mechanisms, real-time reward tracking, and automated verification aim to improve transparency and trust.

With the rapid development of blockchain technology, the cryptocurrency and decentralized finance (DeFi) sectors continue to innovate. As a core technology within these fields, smart contracts have brought users unprecedented convenience and security.

Recently, the UK-based innovative blockchain project OCTOPUS (UK) has officially set a new industry trend with its unique “smart contract-based crypto reward unlocking” mechanism, becoming the focus of market attention.

Unlocking crypto rewards via smart contracts: OCTOPUS (UK) leads the way - 5

I. Smart contracts activate a new ecosystem, making reward mechanisms more transparent

OCTOPUS(UK) utilizes smart contract technology to standardize and automate the distribution of cryptocurrency rewards, achieving a fully on-chain, transparent, and tamper-proof operational process.

Advertisement

When participating in platform activities, users can automatically unlock corresponding rewards via smart contracts by completing specific tasks or holding designated tokens. This not only simplifies the traditionally cumbersome claim process but also eliminates risks associated with manual operations.

According to OCTOPUS (UK)’s official statement, the system employs multi-factor verification and time-lock mechanisms to ensure fair and reasonable reward distribution. Additionally, real-time on-chain data transparency allows users to monitor the status and history of their rewards at any time.

This innovative model effectively enhances user experience and builds trust in the platform.

II. Multi-scenario applications to boost user engagement

Advertisement

Beyond basic token reward unlocking, OCTOPUS’ smart contract system supports a wide range of application scenarios.

For example, users can participate in platform governance voting, liquidity mining, and NFT collecting. All related rewards are calculated and released in real time via smart contracts, significantly improving operational efficiency and convenience.

Particularly noteworthy is OCTOPUS’ “Task Chain Rewards” feature, which allows users to progressively unlock higher-value crypto assets by completing a series of interconnected, multi-stage tasks.

This initiative not only incentivizes long-term user participation in building the platform’s ecosystem but also fosters the community’s healthy development.

Advertisement

III. Security and compliance: ensuring steady asset growth

In the crypto space, the security of user assets remains a critical concern. OCTOPUS adheres to strict security standards, with smart contract code undergoing multiple rounds of professional third-party audits to ensure it is free of vulnerabilities and potential risks.

At the same time, the platform actively complies with UK and international regulatory requirements, promoting compliant operations and striving to create a secure and trustworthy crypto asset management environment for users worldwide.

IV. High praise from industry experts and outlook on future potential

Advertisement

Anna Smith, a senior analyst in the blockchain industry, stated: “OCTOPUS’ innovation in the smart contract reward unlocking mechanism has not only boosted user engagement but also significantly advanced the adoption of crypto assets.

With more ecosystem partnerships and feature upgrades, I believe this project will continue to lead the way in the industry.”

Looking ahead, OCTOPUS plans to further deepen collaborations with mainstream DeFi platforms and NFT projects, expand the scope of reward unlocking scenarios, and continuously optimize smart contract performance, with a commitment to building an open, interconnected, and secure decentralized ecosystem.

Unlocking crypto rewards via smart contracts: OCTOPUS (UK) leads the way - 6

About OCTOPUS (UK)

OCTOPUS is an innovative company focused on blockchain technology research and applications, dedicated to creating secure, transparent, and efficient digital asset management solutions through smart contract technology.

Headquartered in London, UK, the company boasts a team of seasoned blockchain developers and financial experts committed to promoting the healthy development of the blockchain industry.

Advertisement

Cloud mining: A new, simplified path to digital assets

Traditional mining has deterred many potential investors due to its high equipment costs, technical barriers, and expensive operational expenses.

Cloud mining has completely transformed this landscape: users no longer need to purchase bulky mining rigs or bear the burden of high electricity bills and maintenance costs. Instead, they can participate in mining mainstream cryptocurrencies simply by renting cloud computing power online.

Octopus Mining aggregates top-tier computing power from premium mining farms across the globe, delivering stable and efficient mining resources to users.

Advertisement

Unique advantages: The new favorite among global investors

  • Extremely low barrier to entry: Whether someone is a cryptocurrency novice or a seasoned investor, they can register quickly and get started easily — no technical background required.
  • Customizable hashrate options for flexible risk-reward management: Multi-tiered packages cater to varying investment scales and return expectations, allowing users to adjust their strategies in real time.
  • Globally Distributed Mining Facilities: Mitigate risk and secure returns. Mining centers across multiple countries form a distributed computing power network, effectively avoiding single points of failure and ensuring continuous, stable mining operations.
  • High Efficiency and Transparent Returns: The platform eliminates intermediaries, with 90% of mining profits directly returned to users. Combined with real-time daily earnings monitoring, the process is clear and transparent.

User testimonial:

Emma, a London-based investor who joined Octopus Mining in 2026, shared: “I didn’t know much about mining before, but the platform’s simple interface and 24/7 customer support ensured I received timely assistance whenever I encountered issues.

My returns have grown steadily to date, giving me greater confidence in cryptocurrency investments.” This exemplifies the tangible value and peace of mind Octopus Mining delivers to its users.

Security guarantees and compliant operations for peace of mind

Octopus Mining strictly adheres to UK and relevant regulatory requirements, committed to creating a legal, transparent, and sustainable cloud mining environment.

Advertisement

The platform employs a multi-layered information security architecture and utilizes the latest encryption technology to safeguard user privacy and fund security. Distributed storage and multi-factor authentication provide dual protection, while a 24/7 monitoring system promptly addresses potential threats, building a robust defense for investors.

Unlocking crypto rewards via smart contracts: OCTOPUS (UK) leads the way - 7

Conclusion

As a leading innovator in the UK blockchain sector, OCTOPUS is gaining recognition from an increasing number of users and industry professionals through its revolutionary model of unlocking crypto rewards via smart contracts.

Its cutting-edge technological capabilities and comprehensive ecosystem will inject new momentum into the global crypto market, propelling the digital asset economy to new heights.

At this critical stage of the cryptocurrency market’s recovery, Octopus Mining has pioneered a safe and convenient new path in cloud mining for global investors through its professional technical expertise and user-centric service philosophy.

Whether someone is a conservative, risk-averse investor or an active cryptocurrency enthusiast, Octopus Mining offers tailored solutions to help them grow their assets while minimizing risk and enhancing their experience.

Advertisement

Visit the official website.

Sign up in one click with an email or phone number (takes less than a minute),

and receive a $17 bonus to start a free contract plan!

Easily begin the smart cloud mining journey, and join Octopus Mining in welcoming the new era of digital currency!

Advertisement

Disclosure: This content is provided by a third party. Neither crypto.news nor the author of this article endorses any product mentioned on this page. Users should conduct their own research before taking any action related to the company.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Crypto World

AI is crushing startup valuations for pre-ChatGPT firms

Published

on

AI is crushing startup valuations for pre-ChatGPT firms

Matthias Balk | Picture Alliance | Getty Images

Five years ago, venture capitalists were pouring money into American startups selling everything from lingerie subscriptions to scheduling software, anointing them with billion-dollar valuations before most even turned a profit.

It was a frothy era for startups, fueled by a combination of cheap money and pandemic-boosted demand. But even after the Federal Reserve took some froth off by starting to raise interest rates in 2022, many founders believed that they could grow into their inflated valuations, investors told CNBC.

Advertisement

Then, an app called ChatGPT arrived.

“The ChatGPT moment was when people said, ‘Holy smokes, the next generation of entrepreneurs, their coding language is spoken English,’” said Samir Kaul, a partner at the venture firm Khosla Ventures, an early backer of OpenAI.

“Now you’re seeing 50 engineers do what it would’ve taken 500 engineers to do five years ago,” Kaul said. “We had to completely reshuffle how we valued these companies.”

While the shares of public software companies like Salesforce, ServiceNow and Workday got hammered this year because of the threat from artificial intelligence, a quieter reckoning has been unfolding in the private markets.

Advertisement

The AI boom that funneled more than $250 billion into OpenAI and Anthropic ahead of their expected mega-IPOs this year has left hundreds of startups built before ChatGPT’s arrival in 2022 stranded — effectively cut off from venture funding because of their inflated valuations and outdated technology, yet not profitable enough for the public markets.

There are 857 U.S. startups valued at $1 billion or more, the threshold for being deemed a “unicorn” company, according to PitchBook data. But nearly half of that group hasn’t raised fresh funding in the last three years, making those valuations stale, according to the private markets data firm.

Startups that last raised in 2021 are now worth 68% less on average, while those that last raised in 2022 saw a 52% decline, according to Pitchbook’s own valuation estimates.

As a result, more than 220 companies that had reached billion-dollar valuations in the venture boom are now fallen unicorns, according to PitchBook, which provided a list of the companies exclusively to CNBC. The estimates are based on factors including headcount growth and comparisons to public companies.

Advertisement

“A lot of those companies are pre-AI, not just in their cost structure, but also in their products,” Mercury CEO Immad Akhund told CNBC. His company, which raised $200 million in funding last month, provides banking services to a third of early-stage U.S. venture-backed firms.

“They’re definitely in a difficult spot,” he said. “All the attention’s on AI, so if you’re not an AI-first company, you need really strong numbers to raise.”

Glossier, Brooklinen, AG1

The list of fallen unicorns includes well known brands like Glossier, The Farmer’s Dog, Rothy’s, Brooklinen and Savage X Fenty, the lingerie company founded by musician Rihanna. The companies were part of a wave of direct-to-consumer firms built on the hope that digital retailers could earn software-like margins.

Also included are mainstays of podcast advertisements including the powder supplement maker AG1 and the roboadvisor pioneer Betterment, as well as the online ticket marketplace SeatGeek.

Advertisement

These companies came of age in an environment that rewarded growth at nose-bleed valuations based on two broad assumptions: interest rates would remain low and a startup could always be acquired for its engineering talent.

But the arrival of generative AI has redrawn the venture landscape, redirecting capital toward AI-native firms while making it impossible for many older startups to justify their previous valuations.

Hit hardest are enterprise software companies like scheduling startup Calendly, which represent the single largest category among the fallen unicorns. There are 75 software-as-a-service, or SaaS, firms appearing on PitchBook’s list, which is double the number of fintech companies, the next-biggest group.

That reflects both the enormous valuations that software startups commanded during the 2021 venture boom and the degree to which generative AI has destabilized assumptions underpinning the sector.

Advertisement

David Zhu, an ex-DoorDash head of engineering, said that after the “ChatGPT moment” he looked across the software landscape — from startups to medium-sized firms funded with private credit to the largest public SaaS companies — and saw a seismic shift on the horizon.

“The thesis I had was that all workflow-driven enterprise SaaS companies will be either disrupted or dead in the next decade,” Zhu told CNBC.

The Saas model, where companies embed themselves in employee workflows and often charge by the user, is especially threatened by the rise of autonomous agents. After leaving DoorDash, where he led more than 200 engineers, Zhu founded Reevo, an AI platform that automates corporate sales and marketing teams.

Companies built before generative AI are weighed down by bloated staffing models and software designed for a pre-AI world, according to Zhu, making it hard for them to transform themselves.

Advertisement

“Unless they make a stark, 180-degree pivot to rebuild the exact same thing from scratch, they’re going to slowly fail,” Zhu said. “What that means is that investors would rather just bet on new entrepreneurs at lower valuations rather than double down on older startups.”

‘Dominoes to fall’

Most of the 20 fallen unicorns highlighted by CNBC either didn’t respond to multiple requests for comment or declined to comment.

A spokesperson for the drone maker Skydio — estimated by PitchBook to have dropped in value from $2.5 billion to $509 million — said in a statement: “This third-party speculation is false and not based on Skydio’s operations or the exponential growth we are seeing in revenue and customers.”

An AG1 spokesperson didn’t provide a statement for this article, but after CNBC’s inquiry, Reuters reported that the supplement maker was looking to sell part or all of the company at a $2 billion valuation. That figure would include AG1’s debt, the report said.

Advertisement

If a company hasn’t raised funding since 2021 or 2022, its unlikely they’ll ever do so again, say investors and founders. Without access to venture funding or a plausible IPO ramp, the most likely exit for many fallen unicorns is an acquisition at a fraction of their old valuation, they say.

“When we see companies not raising, it’s a red flag,” said PitchBook analyst Andrew Akers, adding that it usually means their growth is tepid or even negative.

While some startups might’ve avoided fundraising because they are generating robust profits, that is the exception to the rule, he said.

“Underneath the surface, I think there are a lot of dominoes to fall,” Akers said.

Advertisement

Collapsing floor

There have been glimmers of a reset among some startups this year.

In February, Stash, the investment and savings app, was acquired by Singapore-based everything app Grab at an enterprise value of $425 million, below the roughly $660 million that investors put into the company during its lifetime.

That same month, another fintech, Step, was acquired by the YouTube star MrBeast for an undisclosed amount, leading investors to speculate that the purchase price was far below the roughly $500 million the startup raised before the deal.

“Many of these businesses just aren’t worth that much anymore, which is why you’re seeing them get acquired at steep discounts,” said Ryan Falvey of Restive Ventures, which invests in fintech firms.

Advertisement

Valuations have compressed by about six-fold from the 2021 peak of 50 times future revenues, meaning that a company with the same revenue is worth about 85% less in today’s market than five years ago, Falvey told CNBC.

Before the reset, a startup could often be sold to a larger technology company looking to acquire the smaller firm’s engineers for roughly $2 million per coder, according to Khosla Ventures’ Kaul. A firm with 100 engineers would be worth at least $200 million to $300 million, he said.

But that assumption, which provided a floor under startup valuations during the boom, evaporated after AI coding tools allowed far smaller teams to build products — leaving exit opportunities few and far between.

‘OpenAI, Anthropic or Google’

The result is that post-GPT startups are running laps around their older competitors, according to Falvey. He called investments made over the past three years “undoubtedly the best” his firm has made.

Advertisement

“We noticed by 2023 that the companies we invested in post-ChatGPT were already making more money than most of the companies we invested in before ChatGPT,” Falvey said.

Generative AI may ultimately reduce the amount of capital required to build successful software companies, challenging one of the core assumptions that fueled the venture boom of the past decade.

The shakeout is probably just beginning, as the impact of AI reverberates across the business funding ecosystem, from venture to private credit to public giants.

Older software firms, Kaul said, still rely on business models built around charging customers based on the number of employees using their products, an approach he believes AI will undermine as companies automate more white-collar work.

Advertisement

Software providers will need to shift toward outcome-based pricing models and AI-native infrastructure to survive, he said.

“The question I ask every time one of them presents is, why can’t OpenAI, Anthropic or Google do this?” Kaul said. “For most of them, the answer is, ‘They can.’”

Choose CNBC as your preferred source on Google and never miss a moment from the most trusted name in business news.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Crypto World

ADA governance vote kills Cardano Summit 2026, approves smaller TOKEN2049 plan

Published

on

Hoskinson might be wrong about the future of decentralized compute

Cardano’s flagship Summit will not take place in 2026 after the Cardano Foundation’s treasury proposal narrowly failed to secure the supermajority needed for approval, marking one of the clearest tests yet of the blockchain’s new governance system.

The Foundation said that it would cancel the Singapore event and begin winding down preparations, despite the proposal receiving majority support from delegated representatives, or DReps.

Advertisement

Unlike many crypto ecosystems where foundations retain broad discretion over conference budgets and ecosystem spending, Cardano now requires community approval for major treasury withdrawals thanks to the Voltaire governance process.

Delegated representatives were introduced as part of Cardano’s Voltaire governance overhaul, a 2024 upgrade that gave ADA holders the ability to elect representatives to vote on treasury spending and protocol decisions.

The Foundation’s Summit proposal became one of the largest and most visible tests yet of that system, asking DReps to decide whether millions of ADA should be spent on the ecosystem’s flagship annual gathering.

The vote followed a broader governance debate that began with a combined proposal from the Cardano Foundation and EMURGO seeking more than 14 million ADA to fund both the Summit and a major presence at TOKEN2049 Singapore. After DReps criticized the size of the request, organizers split the initiative into separate proposals and reduced the scope of the conference sponsorship.

Advertisement

The revised Summit proposal ultimately fell short of the two-thirds threshold required for treasury withdrawals, while EMURGO’s standalone TOKEN2049 proposal won approval. That proposal requests 3.3 million ADA, or about $793,000 based on the exchange rate used in the filing, to fund a Cardano-branded pavilion, builder showcase stage and ecosystem programming at the Singapore conference.

The Foundation said it would respect the outcome and begin winding down Summit preparations, calling the vote an example of the “thoughtful engagement that effective governance requires.”

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2025