Connect with us
DAPA Banner

Crypto World

Okta (OKTA) Stock Surges 4% on Barclays Upgrade Amid Rising Identity Security Priorities

Published

on

OKTA Stock Card

Key Takeaways

  • Barclays elevated Okta (OKTA) to Overweight from Equalweight, boosting the price target from $85 to $90
  • Identity security emerged as the top enterprise spending priority in Barclays’ most recent CIO survey
  • Okta’s ranking among leading security vendors jumped to 6th place, a significant rebound from its 2022–2023 position near the bottom
  • Barclays highlighted Okta’s agentic security prospects, pointing to early six-figure contract wins in this emerging category
  • Raymond James simultaneously upgraded OKTA to Outperform, reinforcing bullish sentiment

Okta shares experienced a solid rally on Monday. The identity management platform provider watched its stock price advance approximately 4.3% following a rating upgrade from Barclays and growing Wall Street confidence in its expansion trajectory.


OKTA Stock Card
Okta, Inc., OKTA

Barclays analyst Saket Kalia elevated Okta’s rating from Equalweight to Overweight while increasing the firm’s price objective to $90 from the previous $85. With shares hovering near $72.25 prior to this announcement, the revised target suggests substantial appreciation potential.

Kalia identified three primary catalysts behind the rating enhancement: strengthened survey metrics, more positive mid-quarter business assessments, and a developing market opportunity within agentic security solutions.

The firm’s latest CIO survey, released simultaneously, positioned identity management as the foremost security investment priority for enterprises—marking the second consecutive survey where this category topped the list. This trend bodes well for Okta’s fundamental business operations.

Okta’s standing among security vendors has witnessed notable improvement. The company now ranks sixth overall in the security vendor landscape—representing a dramatic turnaround from its position near the bottom during 2022 and 2023, a period marked by challenges stemming from a security breach incident.

Advertisement

Identity Management Emerges as Cybersecurity’s Largest Segment

Based on IDC research referenced by Barclays, identity management has evolved into the cybersecurity industry’s largest sub-category, expanding at approximately 19% annually from a $28 billion foundation. This represents a substantial addressable market with Okta positioned as a central player.

Mid-quarter business assessments have shown encouraging signs. Kalia observed more robust underlying market demand, enhanced partner channel activity, and improved operational performance following Okta‘s strategic sales organization restructuring across its Workforce Identity Cloud and Auth0 product lines implemented last year.

The $90 valuation target derives from an elevated fiscal 2028 free cash flow projection of $991 million. Barclays emphasized that Okta’s diversified presence across multiple identity management submarkets provides “multiple durable legs of growth.”

Agentic Security: An Emerging Revenue Opportunity

Among the most compelling elements in the Barclays analysis is the emphasis on AI agents. As organizations increasingly implement autonomous artificial intelligence systems, the challenge of managing access permissions for these digital entities becomes critical.

Advertisement

Barclays raised a fundamental question: “We wonder if protecting agents is fundamentally an identity problem.”

Okta has already begun capturing early market traction in this space. The company closed multiple six-figure transactions for its agentic security products during the most recent quarter, despite constrained product availability.

“We think it’s a rising tide, and believe Okta will be a beneficiary,” Kalia stated.

Barclays wasn’t the only firm expressing renewed confidence. Raymond James similarly elevated Okta to Outperform, highlighting the company’s pioneering position in AI agent security and its comprehensive “secure agentic enterprise” framework.

BMO Capital had previously lifted its Okta price target to $97, while Cantor Fitzgerald continues maintaining an Overweight stance following robust Q4 fiscal 2026 performance.

Those quarterly results exceeded analyst consensus expectations across revenue, operating margins, earnings per share, and current remaining performance obligations metrics.

Advertisement

Notwithstanding Monday’s upward movement, Okta shares remain approximately 22% lower year-to-date. Wall Street price targets span from $75 to $140, with the company’s market capitalization standing at about $11.9 billion.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

Crypto World

DeFi TVL Drops on All Top 20 Chains After KelpDAO Exploit

Published

on

DeFi TVL Drops on All Top 20 Chains After KelpDAO Exploit

The selloff accelerated after the $292 million Kelp DAO exploit on April 18, which drained 116,500 rsETH through a compromised LayerZero-powered cross-chain bridge.

Data from DefiLlama shows Ethereum, which dominates 53.91% of all DeFi TVL, lost 17.91% of its locked value in the past month. The chain now holds $46.17 billion, down from over $56 billion before the hack wave began.

Is Money Leaving DeFi?

The data shows a clear trend: capital is exiting. This DeFi sector contraction mirrors patterns seen in previous risk-off periods, but the breadth of losses stands out.

Solana dropped 19.04% monthly despite a slight 0.17% weekly gain. BSC fell 5.61%. Even Bitcoin DeFi, which had been growing rapidly with a 71.60% monthly gain earlier in the cycle, lost 1.91% in the past 24 hours as contagion spread.

Advertisement

The worst performers tell the story. Mantle collapsed 52.01% in 30 days, falling from over $600 million to $303 million. Ink dropped 34.80%. Katana lost 18.65%. Hyperliquid L1 fell 17.73%. Arbitrum, once considered a safe haven for DeFi activity, declined 16.00% monthly.

Only two chains in the top 20 posted positive monthly gains: Tron at 24.07% and OP Mainnet at 82.11%. Both benefited from stablecoin flows seeking perceived safety outside the Ethereum restaking ecosystem.

DeFi Total Value Locked, Source: DeFiLlama

Kelp DAO Hack Triggers Contagion Across DeFi

The $292 million exploit targeted Kelp DAO’s cross-chain bridge infrastructure. Attackers used poisoned RPC nodes and a DDoS attack to manipulate a single verifier configuration, draining funds across Ethereum and Arbitrum in minutes.

The contagion spread rapidly. Aave urged WETH suppliers to withdraw due to rsETH exposure, triggering billions in outflows from the largest DeFi lending protocol. Ethena, Curve Finance, ether.fi, and Tron DAO froze their LayerZero OFT bridges as a precaution.

LayerZero Labs attributed the attack to TraderTraitor, a Lazarus Group subunit previously linked to the Drift Protocol exploit earlier this month.

Advertisement

Are Users Repricing DeFi Risk?

The TVL decline suggests users are reassessing cross-chain infrastructure risk. Kelp, previously considered one of the top DeFi protocols with over $2 billion in TVL, now faces existential questions about its ability to make users whole.

Plasma lost 28.99% in seven days. Ink dropped 33.30% weekly. These sharp moves indicate active withdrawals rather than passive price depreciation.

Ethereum still dominates with 53.91% of all DeFi TVL, followed by Solana at 6.49%, BSC at 6.34%, Bitcoin at 5.91%, and Tron at 5.89%. But dominance without growth signals a shrinking pie rather than a flight to quality.

The question facing DeFi is whether this represents a temporary repricing or a structural shift in how users evaluate bridge and restaking risk.

Advertisement

The post DeFi TVL Drops on All Top 20 Chains After KelpDAO Exploit appeared first on BeInCrypto.

Source link

Continue Reading

Crypto World

Aave Models $124M to $230M in Bad Debt From Kelp Exploit

Published

on

Aave Models $124M to $230M in Bad Debt From Kelp Exploit

In a detailed incident report, Aave service providers quantified the protocol’s exposure for the first time and outlined two scenarios depending on how Kelp DAO allocates the loss. LayerZero and Kelp continue to blame each other for the compromised bridge configuration.

Aave service providers on Monday published an incident report quantifying the protocol’s exposure to the April 18 Kelp DAO rsETH bridge exploit, outlining two bad-debt scenarios ranging from $123.7 million to $230.1 million, and recommending an immediate pause of the protocol’s Umbrella safety module.

According to the report, posted to the Aave governance forum, 89,567 of the 116,500 rsETH stolen from Kelp’s LayerZero bridge were deposited across seven attacker-controlled wallets on Aave. Those positions borrowed 82,650 WETH ($190.86 million) and 821 wstETH ($2.33 million).

The single largest position, on Aave’s Ethereum Core market, supplied 53,000 rsETH and borrowed 52,460 WETH, or $121 million, from one wallet. The remaining positions were distributed across Aave’s Arbitrum deployment. All attacker positions currently sit at health factors between 1.01 and 1.03.

Advertisement

Kelp subsequently recovered 40,373 rsETH by freezing a second attempted drain. That balance is the only confirmed backing for 152,577 rsETH of claims across every L2, a pro-rata backing ratio of 26.46%. Ethereum mainnet rsETH is backed separately by Kelp’s underlying ETH staking deposits.

Two bad debt scenarios

The report declined to commit to a single bad-debt figure, stating that the outcome depends on decisions outside Aave’s control — primarily how Kelp accounts for the loss and whether it updates its LRTOracle exchange rate.

Under Scenario 1, a uniform socialization across all rsETH holders on all chains, each token takes a 15.12% haircut. Total bad debt reaches $123.7 million, with the Ethereum Core WETH reserve absorbing $91.8 million, or a 1.54% shortfall. Mantle absorbs $10.4 million, or 9.54% of its WETH reserve, the most proportionally acute.

Under Scenario 2, losses are isolated to rsETH on L2s. Remote-chain rsETH is repriced to its 26.46% backing ratio, or a 73.54% haircut, while Ethereum mainnet rsETH is unaffected. Total bad debt rises to $230.1 million, all concentrated on L2s.

Advertisement

In this scenario, Mantle faces a 71.45% shortfall ($77.7 million), Arbitrum 26.67% ($88.4 million), Base 23.28% ($47.5 million), and Ink 18% ($13.9 million). Ethereum Core is untouched.

Umbrella covers only Ethereum Core reserves. Under Scenario 2, it would not activate.

Balance sheet disclosure

The report disclosed the Aave DAO’s financial position. As of April 20, the treasury holds $181 million — $62 million in Ethereum-correlated holdings, $54 million in AAVE tokens, and $52 million in stablecoins. The DAO generated $145 million in revenue in 2025 and $38 million year-to-date in 2026, with operating cash flow of $149 million in 2025 and $40 million year-to-date.

Aave DAO service providers are “leading an effort with ecosystem participants to address a potential bad-debt scenario,” the report said, and the effort has received “indicative commitments from various parties.” It did not identify the parties or quantify the commitments.

Advertisement

The report also recommended the DAO immediately pause the WETH Umbrella module. As of writing, 18,922 of the 23,507 aWETH staked in Umbrella — approximately 80% — have already entered the 20-day unstaking cooldown. A pause would block further deposits, withdrawals, transfers, and slashing. Coverage under a paused module would need to be handled manually through governance rather than automatically.

A second-order liquidation risk

The report also quantified the risk of further bad debt if ETH falls in price while Aave’s WETH reserves remain at 100% utilization. Because idle WETH balances are below $20 on every affected chain, liquidators cannot receive WETH as underlying and instead receive aWETH receipts, which keeps their capital inside the reserve and slows liquidation throughput.

At a 50% ETH price drop, Aave modeled $100.8 million of residual bad debt on Ethereum alone, with smaller amounts on Arbitrum, Base, Linea, and Mantle. Arbitrum and Base were flagged as particularly vulnerable because wstETH looping positions on those chains run at health factors around 1.03 — meaning first liquidations would trigger at ETH price drops of just 0.77% and 1.77%, respectively.

LayerZero and Kelp continue to trade blame

The Aave report did not assign blame for the underlying bridge exploit. LayerZero and Kelp DAO have continued to publicly attribute the incident to each other.

Advertisement

In a Sunday post-mortem, LayerZero Labs attributed the attack to the DPRK-linked Lazarus Group. The company said attackers compromised two downstream Remote Procedure Call (RPC) nodes used by its LayerZero-operated Decentralized Verifier Network (DVN), and introduced malicious software that returned forged data only to the DVN, then launched a DDoS attack to force failover to the poisoned RPC nodes.

LayerZero said the protocol itself was not exploited and attributed the attack’s success to Kelp’s use of a 1-of-1 DVN configuration.

In a rebuttal reported by CoinDesk on Monday, a source familiar with Kelp’s position said a communications channel between the two teams had been open since July 2024 and that LayerZero had not issued a specific recommendation to change the rsETH DVN configuration. The source said the compromised DVN was LayerZero’s own infrastructure and that Kelp’s core restaking contracts were not affected.

Yearn Finance core developer known on X as @banteg, published a technical review showing LayerZero’s public V2 OApp Quickstart uses a 1-of-1 DVN setup in its reference configuration across Ethereum, BSC, Polygon, Arbitrum, and Optimism. CoinDesk reported approximately 40% of applications on LayerZero currently run 1-of-1 configurations.

Advertisement

LayerZero has said it will no longer sign messages for any application using a 1-of-1 DVN configuration.

“DeFi has spent years auditing smart contracts. Kelp is the moment the industry realises the threat doesn’t end at the code. Most protocols are completely exposed at the infrastructure layer,” said Yair Cleper, Co-Founder and CEO of MagmaDevs and contributor to Lava Network, a decentralized marketplace for blockchain data providers.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Crypto World

Bitcoin Preserves Green Weekly Candle as Markets React to US-Iran War

Published

on

Bitcoin Preserves Green Weekly Candle as Markets React to US-Iran War

Bitcoin (BTC) begins the last full week of April juggling fresh US-Iran war fears as resistance hurdles line up.

Key points:

  • Bitcoin stays green on weekly time frames with multiple nearby price levels in focus.

  • Elliott Wave analysis concludes that $81,000 is Bitcoin bulls’ next “final boss.”

  • A resurgent US-Iran war threatens to unravel last week’s crypto and risk-asset gains.

  • Bitcoin ETFs see major inflows, but investors’ cost basis is still above $80,000.

  • Bitcoin’s true market mean metric reveals that the current bear market remains “mild.”

BTC price can still make “new highs” this week

Bitcoin still managed a “green” weekly candle despite last-minute sellers driving price below $74,000.

Data from TradingView shows a modest recovery ensuing as the new week begins — despite the lingering threat of geopolitical escalation between the US, Israel and Iran.

Advertisement
BTC/USD one-hour chart. Source: Cointelegraph/TradingView

Price now has multiple resistance levels overhead, with the nearest being its 21-week exponential moving average (EMA) at $78,400.

Over the weekend, trader and analyst Rekt Capital stressed the influence of that trend line.

“Bitcoin is rejecting from the 21-week EMA (green),” he noted in an X post alongside a print of the weekly chart. 

“It is this rejection that could force a post-breakout retest of the top of the Double Bottom (~$73k) next week, provided Bitcoin Weekly Closes just like this.”

BTC/USD one-week chart. Source: Rekt Capital/X

In a subsequent post, Rekt Capital said that a successful retest of the $73,000 area would “confirm the breakout” for the bulls.

Continuing, trader CrypNuevo forecast that BTC/USD would continue to trade in a range with an $80,000 ceiling “for the next month.” They acknowledged that it was “unknown” how high the pair could go should the US-Iran war definitively end.

BTC/USDT one-day chart. Source: CrypNuevo/X

Crypto trader Michaël van de Poppe, meanwhile, remained upbeat, seeing a push beyond last week’s local highs next. He noted that there was a new “gap” open above price in CME Group’s Bitcoin futures market.

“Relatively strong bounce upwards on $BTC on Monday, as markets tend to go risk-off prior to the open. Gold has gone down, so no attached risk,” he told X followers on Monday. 

“Bitcoin bouncing upwards, and given that there’s still a gap to $77.3K, I would assume we’re going to see new highs this week.”

BTC/USDT 12-hour chart. Source: Michaël van de Poppe/X

$81,000 emerges as Bitcoin’s “final boss”

In its latest BTC price analysis, crypto market intelligence platform Decode placed specific emphasis on $81,000 as the resistance level to beat.

As part of Elliott Wave analysis, Decode showed BTC/USD trading between the 200-week and 21-week EMAs.

Advertisement

“Bitcoin still pinned below the 21 week ema, but looking pretty good overall, and with the final boss at 81k,” it commented.

This “final boss,” Decode explained in subsequent debate on X, “narrows the options from an Elliott Wave perspective, removing short term bearish counts.”

BTC/USD one-week chart. Source: Decode/X

$81,000 also represents the average entry price for institutional buyers of the US spot Bitcoin exchange-traded funds (ETFs). 

Nearby, the cost basis for Bitcoin’s short-term holders (STHs) — entities hodling for up to six months without selling — is now at $83,500, per data from onchain analytics platform CryptoQuant.

Bitcoin STH cost basis data. Source: CryptoQuant

CryptoQuant notes that the STH spent output profit ratio (SOPR) metric — the ratio of STH coins moving onchain in profit or loss — is circling breakeven.

“If SOPR manages to sustainably move back above 1, it would indicate that STHs are once again realizing profits, which is generally positive for the market as long as values do not become excessive,” contributor Darkfost wrote in a QuickTake blog post last week.

Advertisement

Iran war comeback risks risk-asset “unwind”

The US will release little by way of macroeconomic data in the coming week, but markets have bigger concerns.

With the sudden comeback of the US-Iran war, traders are suddenly revisiting the prospect of higher oil prices and a longer-term knock-in effect on inflation. 

“The sudden change in events has characterized the Middle East conflict since it started at the end of February,” trading resource Mosaic Asset Company commented in the latest edition of its regular newsletter, The Market Mosaic

“And it appears that intensifying hostilities could unwind the bullish action over the past few weeks.”

WTI crude oil fell to its lowest levels since early March last week as markets increasingly bet on the ceasefire and agreements between the US and Iran holding. The fresh breakdown in diplomacy sparked a rebound toward $90 per barrel.

Advertisement

S&P 500 futures avoided a major correction at the weekly open, trading down around 0.6% on Monday.

S&P 500 futures one-day chart. Source: Cointelegraph/TradingView

Continuing, however, Mosaic warned that the writing was already on the wall for the equities rally after the S&P hit fresh all-time highs.

“Simply following breadth, sentiment, and positioning by institutional investors helped flag the recent rally. At the same time, warning signs were already emerging as the S&P 500 broke out to record highs,” it wrote. 

“The number of stocks breaking out to new highs is failing [to] confirm the move in the indexes, while buying pressure from a key group of institutional investors has largely run its course.”

S&P 500 relative highs. Source: Mosaic Asset Company

As Cointelegraph reported, oil prices in particular are under the microscope as a US inflation catalyst. The next print of the Consumer Price Index (CPI), which will reflect the ongoing impact of the war during April, is due for release on May 12.

Risk-on institutions wake up to Bitcoin

The upshot in risk appetite amid Iran relief had a near-instant impact on Bitcoin institutional investment vehicles.

Advertisement

In particular, the US spot ETFs saw considerable capital inflows through Friday, with more than 25,000 BTC entering over five days.

“The latest accumulations by spot ETF firms are significant, as the last time they posted a figure this close was in April 2025, when they added 23,900 units,” CryptoQuant noted in a QuickTake blog post on the topic.

US spot Bitcoin ETF netflows (screenshot). Source: Farside Investors

Data from UK-based investment company Farside Investors confirms that on Friday alone, the net inflows to the ETFs were more than $660 million — the largest single-day total since January.

“Aside from the current milestone, BTC spot ETFs are recovering,” CryptoQuant continued. 

“The balance held by the firm offering them has been declining since October, but has risen since the February dip.”

US spot Bitcoin ETF holdings data. Source: CryptoQuant

In BTC terms, the ETFs’ total holdings are now at their highest since November 2025.

Commenting on X, Andre Dragosch, European head of research at crypto asset manager Bitwise, acknowledged that ETF investors’ cost basis is still above spot price at $81,000, increasing the psychological significance of that level as a resistance hurdle.

Bitcoin price downside still on “milder path”

The average Bitcoin hodler remains underwater despite the recent trip to 10-week highs for BTC/USD.

Related: Bitcoin can grow ‘probably a lot bigger’ than $30T+ gold market — Analysis

New research from onchain analytics platform Glassnode also warns that in terms of history, Bitcoin’s current bear-market drawdown remains “mild.”

Advertisement

In an X article published on Thursday, lead analyst CryptoVizArt used the true market mean (TMM) metric to assess hodler profitability. TMM filters out long-dormant or lost coins to provide a more accurate picture of cost basis for the active BTC supply.

“When BTC trades below TMM, the average active holder is underwater. Since 2016, this has happened ten times with meaningful negative outcomes — episodes lasting from 2 days to over 11 months, with max drawdowns ranging from -0.1%  to -57%,” they summarized.

Bitcoin true market mean chart. Source: Glassnode

Bitcoin is now over 75 days into its latest sub-TMM phase, with TMM itself at $78,200.

A chart plotting 2026 against Bitcoin’s historical average dips below TMM shows price forging a “milder path” than before.

“That said, 75 days is still early. The 2018 and 2022 episodes didn’t bottom until months 5-9,” CryptoVizArt warned. 

Advertisement

“The signal isn’t ‘all clear’ — it’s ‘watch closely.’ Reclaiming the TMM and stabilizing there would mark active investors returning to profit, historically a strong reset point for momentum.” 

BTC price performance comparison. Source: CryptoVizArt/X