Connect with us
DAPA Banner

Crypto World

Resolv Labs burns hacked USR as exploit losses hit $34m

Published

on

OpenAI launches smart contract security evaluation system

Resolv Labs burns 36.7m hacked USR after a key compromise let an attacker mint 80m unbacked tokens and dump $24.5m in ETH, leaving a $34m hole in the protocol.

Resolv Labs has destroyed 36.73 million USR stablecoins previously controlled by an attacker, using a contract upgrade to claw back part of the haul from a March exploit that printed 80 million unbacked tokens and left the protocol nursing an estimated $34 million loss. According to on-chain analyst Yu Jin, “about 1 hour ago, Resolv Labs destroyed 36.73 million USR held by the hacker through a contract upgrade,” after the exploiter had already liquidated roughly 34 million USR for 11,409 ETH (about $24.48 million) now parked at address 0x8ED…81C. In total, Resolv’s team has removed about 46 million USR from the attacker’s address, but the value extracted in ETH leaves the protocol facing a real economic hit of around $34 million.

Advertisement

The incident stems from a critical failure in Resolv’s USR minting flow that allowed a single attacker, using less than $200,000 in initial collateral, to generate 80 million uncollateralized USR and dump them across DeFi liquidity pools. Chainalysis described it as a case where “an attacker was able to mint tens of millions of Resolv’s unbacked stablecoins (USR) and extract roughly $23 million in value,” highlighting how a compromised service key in a two-step off-chain minting process can cascade into systemic losses. In its earlier coverage, crypto.news reported that USR “lost its peg after an attacker minted millions of unbacked tokens,” forcing Resolv Labs to pause operations and roll out a recovery plan as the stablecoin crashed as low as $0.14 before partially rebounding.

DeFi reacts as USR exploit ripples through markets

The USR exploit has become a case study in DeFi key management risk, drawing comparisons with other recent stablecoin failures and lending-market contagion. In a post-mortem, Resolv Labs stressed that its collateral pool “remains intact” despite the exploit-driven mint of 80 million USR, even as liquidity providers and leveraged users across integrated protocols absorbed price slippage and forced unwinds. Earlier analysis of the crash showed USR at one point trading near $0.23–$0.27, with on-chain data firms estimating attacker profits between $23 million and $25 million as the token depegged on Curve and other pools.

The partial burn of 36.73 million USR via contract upgrade underscores how privileged controls can both enable and mitigate catastrophic failures in nominally decentralized systems. For traders watching Resolv and its governance token RESOLV, which previously saw volatile swings after exchange listings and buybacks, the episode revives long‑standing questions over whether yield-bearing stablecoins can scale without introducing single points of failure. As crypto.news noted in a prior story on the USR depeg, DeFi protocols with composable stablecoins now face renewed pressure to harden minting logic, rotate keys, and treat backend infrastructure with the same rigor as audited smart contracts.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

Crypto World

Grayscale Says Bitcoin’s Quantum Problem is Mostly a Social One

Published

on

Grayscale Says Bitcoin’s Quantum Problem is Mostly a Social One

The challenge to solving the quantum threat to Bitcoin could be more social than technical, according to Grayscale’s head of research, especially if the community fails to come to an agreement on certain contentious issues.

Google released a paper that shook the crypto industry on March 30, suggesting that a quantum computer could potentially crack the cryptography protecting Bitcoin (BTC) using far fewer resources than previously thought.

Grayscale head of research Zach Pandl, however, suggested the problem for Bitcoin doesn’t come from its technical solution, as “bitcoin has lower risk than other cryptocurrencies” because it uses a UTXO model and proof-of-work consensus, does not have native smart contracts and certain address types are not quantum vulnerable.

Instead, the challenge would be for the community to reach a decision on the way forward, said Pandl. 

Advertisement

The Bitcoin community has been fiercely debating what to do about old dormant coins, particularly the roughly 1.7 million BTC locked in early P2PK addresses, including Satoshi’s estimated 1 million BTC stash, currently worth about $68 billion. 

The Bitcoin community has three options 

The Bitcoin community needs to decide what to do about coins where the private key has been lost or is otherwise inaccessible, wrote Pandl. 

They have three main options: burning the coins, deliberately slowing their release by limiting the rate of spending from vulnerable addresses or doing nothing. 

“All are conceptually doable, but the challenge is reaching a decision, and the Bitcoin community has a history of contentious debates over protocol changes, including last year’s dispute around image data stored in blocks.”

Pandl was referring to a big fracas that erupted in 2023 over the use of blockspace for Bitcoin Ordinals, technology that enables inscribing data such as text and images to a satoshi, the smallest unit of Bitcoin. 

Advertisement

Two years later, the debate may have quietened down, but the two sides continue to hold opposing views.

Related: Researchers say quantum computers could, in theory, be ready by 2030

About 1.7 million BTC is vulnerable to the quantum threat. Source: Grayscale

No threat now but time to get started

Pandl cautioned that it was “time to get started” and that blockchains need to adopt post-quantum cryptography, echoing the sentiment from Google. 

Both Solana and the XRP Ledger are already experimenting with post-quantum cryptography, wrote Pandl. Meanwhile, the Ethereum Foundation released its post-quantum roadmap in February.

Pandl concluded that investors “should not fret” for now, but it is time to accelerate efforts to prepare for our post-quantum future. 

Advertisement

“In our view, there is no security threat to public blockchains from quantum computers today.”

Magazine: Nobody knows if quantum secure cryptography will even work