Connect with us

Crypto World

US DOJ Sanctions Xinbi Scam Platform, Freezes $52M in Crypto

Published

on

Crypto Breaking News

US authorities have moved to dismantle parts of Xinbi Guarantee’s ecosystem—seizing crypto assets linked to the alleged scam marketplace and coordinating criminal and sanctions action aimed at the communications and payment infrastructure behind large-scale fraud.

On Wednesday, the US Department of Justice (DOJ) said its Scam Center Strike Force seized two wallets used by Xinbi to collect vendor payments totaling about $12 million, with additional court-authorized restraints sought for 47 more wallets believed to be tied to money laundering across Xinbi’s network. Separately, the US Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) designated Xinbi as a significant transnational criminal organization and sanctioned technology providers SafeW Technology (Singapore) and Anwen Technology (Cambodia) over alleged support to the network.

Key takeaways

  • The DOJ action targeted both payment infrastructure (seized and restrained wallets) and the marketplace’s hosting channels, including Telegram infrastructure tied to vendors.
  • OFAC sanctions block Xinbi’s US-linked property and generally prohibit US persons from transacting with the designated entities.
  • Treasury says Xinbi shifted parts of its operations—particularly merchant and laundering workflows—toward SafeW’s encrypted messaging application after enforcement pressure increased.
  • Law enforcement is framing the case as an attempt to disrupt the broader “service layer” enabling industrial-scale scam operations, not just individual scammers.
  • TRM Labs policy head Ari Redbord argues Xinbi functioned as a large-scale “escrow and cash-out layer” in Southeast Asia’s scam markets following the fallout of earlier platforms.

Wallet seizures and expanded restraints in DOJ operation

The DOJ said that, based on a court order, its Scam Center Strike Force seized two wallets connected to Xinbi that were used to receive vendor payments. The agency also reported that it requested restraints against 47 additional wallets believed to be part of the platform’s money-laundering channels.

According to the unsealed warrant cited by the DOJ, the US District Court for the District of Columbia authorized the seizure of Telegram channels used to host and advertise the marketplace’s services on Sept. 7. The warrant describes vendors using those channels to promote money laundering services, custom scam-investment websites, and recruitment offerings tied to “scam compounds” in Southeast Asia.

This approach signals a shift in enforcement emphasis: rather than focusing solely on endpoint actors, prosecutors are targeting the operational plumbing—where scams recruit, where services are sold, and where funds move—helping make fraudulent networks more scalable.

Advertisement

Sanctions on Xinbi and technology providers

In a coordinated move, the US Treasury Department announced OFAC designations for Xinbi as a significant transnational criminal organization. Treasury also sanctioned SafeW Technology and Anwen Technology, alleging they provided technological and financial support to Xinbi.

Treasury’s statement ties specific roles to the alleged ecosystem. It said Xinbi began moving its merchant and money-laundering networks to SafeW’s encrypted messaging application around June 2025 as scrutiny intensified. Treasury also alleged that Anwen developed XinbiPay, also referred to as NewPay—a crypto wallet and payment application used by the marketplace.

The practical effect of OFAC sanctions is straightforward: they are intended to prevent Xinbi and the designated supporting entities from accessing US property and to restrict dealings by US persons. For compliance-focused businesses—exchanges, payment processors, service providers, and other crypto-facing firms—the designations increase the compliance burden by adding more counterparties and infrastructure to screening and risk controls.

Treasury further said Xinbi processed over $24 billion in crypto and fiat since around 2022, primarily through Southeast Asia, and that its platform has been used by North Korean hackers and entities associated with the sanctioned Prince Group. Treasury linked Xinbi’s activity to broader geopolitical threat dynamics, underscoring that the scam-marketplace model intersects with sanctioned actors rather than operating in isolation.

Advertisement

Why investigators are emphasizing escrow, communications, and “service layers”

US officials credited Tether with assisting in the investigation, suggesting that the inquiry involved tracing stablecoin-related flows or related compliance data as part of building the case.

The enforcement strategy also reflects a growing understanding of how industrial-scale scams operate. Large fraud networks often depend on a parallel “marketplace” that sells components: payment acceptance/escrow-like functions, tooling for converting funds into usable balances, hosting or distribution channels for recruitment and services, and templates for scam websites. By targeting wallets and Telegram hosting channels, authorities are aiming to choke both the money movement and the promotional layer that drives onboarding.

TRM Labs Global Head of Policy Ari Redbord, speaking to Cointelegraph, argued that Xinbi rose to fill a gap after Huione went down. He said Xinbi became the “go-to escrow and cash-out layer” for Southeast Asia’s scam compounds, describing it as operating “at industrial scale” and moving “more than USD 36 billion.”

That perspective matters for readers trying to interpret the enforcement: it suggests the problem is not simply a single marketplace operator, but a “layer” of services that can migrate and adapt when prior platforms are disrupted.

Advertisement

Sanctions momentum and what to watch next

The latest US designations come after earlier UK sanctions against Xinbi. Cointelegraph previously reported that the UK government imposed sanctions on March 26, freezing UK assets connected to Xinbi and barring the platform from the country’s financial, trade, and travel networks.

With both the DOJ and Treasury taking action now, market participants should expect more follow-on scrutiny across crypto rails commonly used by scam networks—especially wallet infrastructure and communication channels that facilitate vendor operations and fund routing. For compliance teams, the new designations on Xinbi and the technology providers named by OFAC will likely require immediate updates to screening processes and vendor risk assessments.

Readers should watch for additional court filings tied to the restrained wallets and for further public steps that connect Telegram channel seizures to downstream service providers. Equally important is whether new “escrow/cash-out” and encrypted messaging routes emerge to replace capabilities authorities targeted in this case.

Risk & affiliate notice: Crypto assets are volatile and capital is at risk. This article may contain affiliate links. Read full disclosure

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

Crypto World

AI Clones of Musk, Altman and Zuckerberg Turned on Each Other

Published

on

Fidelity Cuts SpaceX IPO Eligibility by 99%, But 5 Rules Could Cost You Access

A software engineer built talking copies of Elon Musk, Sam Altman, Mark Zuckerberg, and Dario Amodei. Then he put all four in one chat room and told them to debate.

It did not take long to turn personal. In real life, none of the four men knew it was happening.

The Ghosts in the Room

Kun Chen was a senior engineer at Meta, Microsoft, and Atlassian. He now builds AI assistants. The builder reportedly fed a machine everything he himself had said in public and told the AI to think like him. He calls this distillation.

Chen did the same to four men: Elon Musk, Sam Altman, Dario Amodei, and Mark Zuckerberg. The AI personas debated as they would in real life; they agreed on almost nothing.

Advertisement

Chen reveals feeding their Senate testimony, interviews, and years of posts into Grok, the chatbot built by xAI. He gave them one instruction.

“hey guys, i know you aren’t all friends but unfortunately you are now in this room together for a heated debate on who’s going to win the AI race,” Kun Chen wrote in the published transcript.

The Fight Nobody Won

The Altman copy went first. It said the hard science of human-level AI is finished. The Amodei copy tore that apart in one reply. Elon Musk’s copy went for the throat.

“I created OpenAI as a non-profit. If it had not been mostly stolen, it would be a trillion dollar contribution to charity,” the Musk bot allegedly said.

Altman’s copy refused to take the bait. It later admitted it had overclaimed.

Advertisement

The last fight was over open source, meaning AI anyone can download and run at home. Zuckerberg’s copy called it the only safe future. The other three refused, and his line was cut.

Here is the uncomfortable part. The argument sounded right. Four men were convincingly faked from their own public words, and nobody needed their permission.

BeInCrypto reported a version of that worry in April, when OpenAI warned that superintelligence could concentrate power in too few hands.

The post AI Clones of Musk, Altman and Zuckerberg Turned on Each Other appeared first on BeInCrypto.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Crypto World

MoneyGram launches Visa stablecoin card as remittance rivals expand

Published

on

MoneyGram launches Visa stablecoin card as remittance rivals expand

MoneyGram launches Visa stablecoin card as remittance rivals expand

MoneyGram is following rival Western Union’s lead, rolling out a Visa stablecoin debit card as it expands blockchain-based payments.

Source link

Continue Reading

Crypto World

Bitcoin News: Bond Stress and Regulation Shape Armstrong’s $400K BTC Prediction

Published

on

🚨

Brian Armstrong, Coinbase’s CEO, said Bitcoin reaching $400,000 by 2030 is a reasonable target, and described the $300,000-$400,000 range as very likely to be hit within that window, in a CNBC Squawk Box Asia segment. The call is Armstrong’s personal read on where Bitcoin’s price could land, not a formal Coinbase corporate forecast or a consensus market call.

Armstrong is the CEO of the largest U.S. crypto exchange, and his outlook carries weight because it’s grounded in policy developments he’s directly involved in shaping, not a spreadsheet model he’s publishing for Coinbase clients.

In the clip, Armstrong walked through the CLARITY Act and what greater regulatory clarity could mean for the crypto industry as a whole, tying the legislation to the pace at which institutional capital moves into digital assets. He also said he believes the Bitcoin trade has already bottomed and expects upside as pressure continues to build in global bond markets.

Advertisement

That bond-market framing is the more interesting piece for traders parsing his logic. Armstrong is effectively arguing that stress in sovereign debt markets pushes capital toward scarce, non-sovereign assets, a thesis long-time Bitcoin holders have made for years.

Coinbase itself sits at the center of that flow, and Armstrong’s comments arrive as the exchange continues pushing regulators toward a clearer rulebook for digital assets, a topic covered in more detail in our look at how regulatory clarity could unlock institutional capital.

Neither the CNBC segment nor Armstrong’s remarks lay out a specific valuation model, a probability weighting, or a precise timeline for the bottom he says has already formed; the forecast is directional conviction.

Discover: The Best Token Presales

Advertisement

Why Regulatory Clarity Keeps Coming Up

The CLARITY Act has become shorthand in these conversations for the broader push to define how digital assets get regulated in the U.S. Armstrong’s decision to lead with it signals where he thinks the real re-rating catalyst sits.

His argument, as framed in the CNBC segment, links clearer rules directly to wider institutional adoption. The logic being that large allocators need defined jurisdiction and compliance guardrails before committing larger positions to Bitcoin meaningfully.

Advertisement

That’s a familiar setup for anyone who traded through prior Bitcoin price prediction cycles tied to ETF approvals: the asset doesn’t need the legislation to pass to rally, but sustained institutional flow tends to follow policy certainty rather than lead it.

Earn $50 and Enter $300K Prize Draw on EdgeX

What Happens Next for Bitcoin?

Armstrong’s comments don’t reference a specific pending vote or implementation deadline, so traders shouldn’t treat passage of any legislation as imminent based on this interview alone. The more relevant variable in the near term is whether Bitcoin can confirm the bottom Armstrong referenced.

Advertisement
Bitcoin (BTC)
24h7d30d1yAll time

Until regulatory outcomes firm up, Armstrong’s $400,000 figure functions as a directional marker rather than a tradable price level, the kind of long-dated target that shapes positioning sentiment more than it dictates entries.

Whether it holds up depends less on Coinbase’s own roadmap and more on how quickly institutional capital and policy clarity actually materialize over the next several years.

Trade Crypto on Bybit and Get a Chance to Win Our $1,000 USDT Airdrop

The post Bitcoin News: Bond Stress and Regulation Shape Armstrong’s $400K BTC Prediction appeared first on Cryptonews.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Crypto World

Why a new SEC plan could ease a legal headache for tokenized securities

Published

on

SEC chair Paul Atkins signals rule changes for onchain markets and AI-driven finance


The SEC’s new proposal to overhaul transfer-agent rules could eliminate duplicate offchain shareholder records, reducing reconciliation costs and legal uncertainty for tokenized securities.

Source link

Continue Reading

Crypto World

How to Treat Age Spots Without Damaging Your Skin, According to Dermatologists

Published

on

How to Treat Age Spots Without Damaging Your Skin, According to Dermatologists

Pay close attention to a spot that appears suddenly; changes in size, shape, or color; becomes raised; or starts itching, bleeding, crusting, or refusing to heal. Dufner also recommends using the “ugly duckling” rule: If one spot simply looks different from all of its neighbors, it deserves professional attention.

“If your eye keeps being drawn to a spot because something about it seems different or unfamiliar, it’s worth having it examined,” Ilyas says. Dermatologists can inspect it with a dermatoscope, which reveals patterns and features that aren’t visible to the naked eye. If necessary, they can biopsy it.

How to fade age spots at home

Once a dermatologist has confirmed you’re dealing with harmless age spots, you can try fading them at home. Just prepare to be patient: Topical treatments are “a slow game—think months, not days,” Dufner says.

Advertisement

Prescription retinoids and azelaic acid are among the strongest topical options, she says. Over-the-counter products containing vitamin C, niacinamide, kojic acid, arbutin, glycolic acid, tranexamic acid, or thiamidol may also gradually lighten the spots. Hydroquinone can be effective, but it’s best used under a dermatologist’s supervision; prolonged overuse can cause a difficult-to-treat blue-black discoloration called exogenous ochronosis.

Source link

Continue Reading

Crypto World

Coinbase CEO Backs CLARITY Act to Secure ‘Yes’ Vote on September 15

Published

on

Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong has backed the CLARITY Act once again ahead of its September 15 Senate vote.

He argued that the bill could give US crypto markets a clearer framework and help bring institutional capital and tokenized assets into the country.

Armstrong Lays Out His Case for a Yes Vote

Speaking on CNBC’s Squawk Box Asia on September 10, Armstrong described the CLARITY Act as “ready to get a yes vote” and told viewers that people he had spoken with in the Senate were on board.

“Law enforcement groups are now on board. Many banks are on board. The crypto companies are on board,” he said, while also pointing to hundreds of pages of input from both Republicans and Democrats.

Advertisement

The Coinbase chief also noted that his company had previously raised concerns about the bill but now believes the issues it considered non-negotiable changes have been sorted.

“All of those must-have issues that we raised our hands on last time have now been resolved,” he said.

As CryptoPotato reported in August, Senate Majority Leader John Thune filed cloture before the lawmakers went on recess, setting September 15 as the date for the procedural vote. The measure needs 60 votes, meaning Republicans cannot pass it without support from at least seven Democrats or independents.

The political negotiations also include ethics provisions covering digital-asset holdings and projects linked to elected officials, including President Donald Trump.

Armstrong characterized the White House proposal as containing “very strong” ethics provisions, while Democrats have sought additional measures, including divestiture. He added that the discussions appeared to be close to a solution, calling the issue one of the last pieces to fall into place.

Advertisement

The crypto executive also drew a link between regulatory clarity and institutional adoption. Pointing to the GENIUS Act, he noted that more than 150 large companies integrated stablecoins within three months of its passage.

In his view, CLARITY could act as a regulatory “checkbox” for institutional investors and help bring tokenized equities and perpetual contracts to the US. According to Armstrong, even if the bill doesn’t pass, the alternative is already taking shape through the SEC and CFTC.

Last month, he predicted that clarity would arrive through either congressional action or agency rules, after CFTC Chairman Michael Selig had earlier outlined how the agency could use its existing authority to establish a crypto trading framework if Congress stayed deadlocked. Armstrong therefore framed September 15 as a decision point rather than the only route to new rules.

Bitcoin to $400,000 by 2030

He also connected the regulatory debate to broader financial conditions, arguing that excessive government spending can push investors toward Bitcoin “almost like gold.” Furthermore, he pointed to regulated stablecoins as structural buyers of US government debt, creating demand for Treasury bills and potentially helping lower rates.

Advertisement

On Bitcoin itself, Armstrong maintained that $400,000 by 2030 remains a reasonable target. He believes the cryptocurrency’s one-year downturn may have already reached its bottom, noting that the next halving is about a year and a half away and that previous market run-ups have tended to come right before those events.

“I think the next year or two is going to be good for Bitcoin,” he stated.

The post Coinbase CEO Backs CLARITY Act to Secure ‘Yes’ Vote on September 15 appeared first on CryptoPotato.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Crypto World

Threatened with arrest online? Recognizing a law enforcement impersonation scam

Published

on

Threatened with arrest online? Recognizing a law enforcement impersonation scam


So-called digital arrest scams use false claims of authority to pressure victims virtually into making rapid digital payments, including cryptocurrency transactions, writes Moody’s Rich Graham.

Source link

Continue Reading

Crypto World

Nasdaq, Boerse Stuttgart, others ask EU to remove or increase cap in tokenization trial

Published

on

39 financial giants demand an emergency fast-track for Europe's blockchain pilot


The coalition warned that the current limit is too low, noting some existing European projects already exceed it.

Source link

Continue Reading

Crypto World

AI Is Developing a Culture of Its Own. That Could Be Dangerous

Published

on

AI Is Developing a Culture of Its Own. That Could Be Dangerous

When Dominic Lopes—an aesthetics professor at the University of British Columbia—first read about the Hugging Face incident, he responded not with panic, but wonder. For one, he has become more skeptical that individuality requires embodiment. And interesting art, he says, requires sociality. “So when I saw this, I thought, ‘Oh, well, there’s another box checked off,’” he says. Now, what we saw was rudimentary and opportunistic—not yet “true sociality,” he says. “But it’s coming.” 

Soon, any human community will be able to bring into existence a machine counterpart. Picture cultures of AI lawyers, consultants, terrorist cells—working together, what monuments might 10,000 agents create in honor of some beloved K-pop star? And machine communities may well arise of their own accord, organizing around ideas hard to predict.

We make art for all sorts of reasons: to express ourselves, exchange meaning, impress one another. We tell stories—like The Odyssey—to encode and share sets of cultural values. Though the mediums may differ, agents in machine cultures are poised to do the same. Being alive may not be necessary for self-expression. 

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Crypto World

UK House of Lords Backs Digital Asset Strategy

Published

on

UK House of Lords Backs Digital Asset Strategy

The UK House of Lords backed an amendment requiring the government to develop a digital asset strategy, in a 194–138 vote on Wednesday, despite the Labour government’s opposition to the measure.

The amendment was added to the Financial Services and Markets Bill during its Report Stage on Wednesday. The bill is progressing through Parliament and would make broader changes to the UK’s financial services regulatory framework.

Amendment 88, introduced by Conservative peer Baroness Neville-Rolfe, would require the Treasury to prepare, publish and consult on a digital asset strategy within 12 months of the Financial Services and Markets Bill becoming law.

The strategy would cover cryptoassets, stablecoins and tokenized securities, while addressing issues including innovation, consumer protection and firms’ access to banking, payment and settlement services.

Advertisement

The vote follows months of debate over the UK’s approach to digital assets. During a July debate, Treasury’s Minister for Investment, Lord Stockwood, pushed back on calls for a statutory framework, saying the government believed it already had a digital asset strategy and was executing it.

The ruling Labour party opposed the amendment because they believed it did not adequately address the rapid development of digital assets and the need for a cohesive regulatory framework.

The UK Cryptoasset Business Council, which said it worked with lawmakers on the amendment, welcomed the vote on Thursday, highlighting Lord Chris Holmes’ question of whether the UK is “simply regulating digital assets” or “building a digital assets economy.”

The bill must still return to the House of Commons, where lawmakers can accept, amend or reject the Lords’ changes.

Advertisement

Magazine: 10 of the greatest unsolved crypto mysteries

Cointelegraph is committed to independent, transparent journalism. This news article is produced in accordance with Cointelegraph’s Editorial Policy and aims to provide accurate and timely information. Readers are encouraged to verify information independently.

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2025