Crypto World
VC in Latin America must throw out Silicon Valley’s playbook
Disclosure: The views and opinions expressed here belong solely to the author and do not represent the views and opinions of crypto.news’ editorial.
The formulas that work well for venture capitalists investing in the United States — the blitzscaling mindset, the obsession with user growth over revenue, the eagerness to fund abstract infrastructure bets — simply don’t map onto Latin America, a region defined by macro instability and a consumer base that uses crypto out of necessity rather than ideology.
Summary
- Latin America isn’t Silicon Valley on a delay: Crypto adoption is driven by necessity — inflation, capital controls, remittances — not ideology or yield, so growth-at-all-costs models break fast.
- Revenue, liquidity, and licenses beat hype: Winning startups control local rails, banking relationships, and regulatory access; community buzz and abstract network effects don’t survive real-world stress.
- Scaling looks like logistics, not SaaS: Each new country is a new financial system, with political and macro risk baked in — VCs who don’t reprice that reality will keep misfiring.
The Silicon Valley playbook assumes two things: that capital is abundant, and that markets are homogenous. In Latin America, neither is true. Liquidity is thinner, operating costs are higher, and each major market has its own idiosyncratic rules, banks, tax environments, and political risks. VCs entering the region must unlearn the idea that a “regional rollout” is just a matter of translating the app and hiring a local general manager. Crypto companies here scale more like logistics companies than software startups.
If VCs from the United States want to fund projects in Latin America’s crypto scene, they must write a completely new investing thesis. That means funding revenue-first businesses, valuing regulatory licensing more than “community,” prioritizing teams who understand local corridors, and letting go of the idea that what works in San Francisco will work in São Paulo. Latin America’s crypto market is not a derivative of the U.S. market; it is its own ecosystem with its own constraints and opportunities. Investors who recognize that early will dominate the next decade.
Latin America’s unique characteristics
The biggest mistake venture capitalists make when investing in Latin America is assuming the region is merely an earlier stage of the same market dynamics they understand in the United States. That assumption quietly shapes everything, from how they evaluate products to how they price risk… and it is wrong.
In the United States, crypto adoption is often fueled by ideology, experimentation, and yield-chasing. Failure is tolerated. Switching costs are low. In Latin America, crypto adoption is more utilitarian than aspirational. People use blockchain technology to protect savings from inflation, access dollars, move money across borders, or navigate capital controls. These users are not early adopters in the typical Silicon Valley sense; they are economically constrained actors solving immediate problems.
This distinction matters because it breaks the growth-at-all-costs mindset. Latin American crypto users are pragmatic and price-sensitive. If a product is slow, expensive, unreliable, or confusing, it is abandoned immediately. There is no patience for onboarding funnels or roadmap promises. Products must work from day one, under stress, at a reasonable scale. So applying Valley-style growth models (subsidizing usage and deferring monetization) is a mistake.
The error compounds when investors treat Latin America as a downstream extension of U.S. crypto trends. Too many funds approach the region looking to localize whatever is hot in San Francisco: the next DeFi primitive, the next infrastructure layer, the next community-first protocol.
But Latin America is not waiting for imported innovation. It is already pioneering real-world crypto use cases under conditions far harsher than those faced by developed markets. In that sense, Latin America is a leading indicator, not a lagging one. Many of the problems crypto claims it will solve in the future are already present in the region today.
Trust dynamics reinforce this divergence. In Silicon Valley’s online-native culture, Crypto Twitter still matters enormously. As does Discord. In Latin America, trust is built offline, through institutions, brands, customer support, regulatory standing, and physical presence. Users care less about slick community strategies and more about whether a product works during a currency crisis or a banking disruption.
The art of investing
The Silicon Valley model assumes abundant capital and forgiving markets; assumptions that simply do not hold in Latin America. That’s why revenue matters much earlier for startups in the region. Liquidity is thinner, fundraising cycles are longer, and macro shocks are frequent. A startup that fails to generate revenue early is very exposed.
Scaling further exposes the limits of software-first thinking. In the United States, expanding regionally is largely a question of marketing spend and infrastructure. In Latin America, each new country is a new financial system. It involves new banks, new payment rails, new tax regimes, new FX controls, new regulators, and new political risks. Expanding jurisdictionally is like building a logistics corridor. Investors who expect SaaS-style expansion curves systematically misjudge timelines and execution risk.
Liquidity is another axis where the Silicon Valley model fails. VCs tend to prioritize abstract network effects, assuming global scale will naturally translate into defensibility. In the Latin American crypto scene, the real bottleneck is liquidity fragmentation. Winning companies control local fiat on- and off-ramps and maintain strong banking relationships. Local liquidity, not global narratives, determines success.
Regulation completes the picture
U.S. crypto investors often celebrate regulatory gray zones as opportunities to move fast. In Latin America, regulatory arbitrage is not a viable long-term strategy. Regulation is fragmented, but unavoidable. Banking relationships, licenses, and compliance frameworks are competitive moats. Companies that “move fast and break things” often destroy their ability to operate at all. Investors who fail to value regulatory depth consistently underestimate what durability looks like in this market.
Finally, risk itself must be reframed. Silicon Valley underwriting models focus heavily on product-market fit and technical execution. In Latin America, risk is just as macro and political. Elections can trigger capital controls overnight. Banking partners can disappear. Regulatory frameworks can shift abruptly. Investors need to adapt their risk models to avoid mispricing outcomes.
Investing in Latin America isn’t necessarily harder; it’s just different. Crypto adoption here is real, demand-driven, and already embedded in daily economic life in many places. Investors who insist on applying Silicon Valley’s playbook will continue to misunderstand the market. Those who shift their mindset will end up backing the companies with the right DNA.
Google Antigravity is a new development environment designed specifically for the era of software built alongside autonomous AI agents. Unlike traditional IDEs, which integrate artificial intelligence as an auxiliary assistant, Antigravity introduces a fundamentally different paradigm: agent‑first development.
In this model, developers no longer interact solely with files and syntax. Instead, they collaborate with intelligent agents capable of planning, generating, refactoring, testing and maintaining entire software systems.
For frontend engineers, backend developers, full‑stack specialists, software architects and technical teams working with AI‑assisted workflows, understanding Google Antigravity is not optional. It represents an early signal of how modern engineering productivity is about to change.
This article explains what Google Antigravity is, how it works conceptually, how it differs from current AI‑enhanced IDEs, and why it could reshape software development over the coming years.
What is Google Antigravity
Google Antigravity is an agent‑native integrated development environment built for collaboration with autonomous coding agents rather than traditional editor‑centric workflows.
Where environments such as VS Code or JetBrains products embed AI as contextual support layers, Antigravity positions agents as active participants across the entire development lifecycle.
This includes:
- technical task planning
- structured code generation
- automated refactoring
- assisted debugging
- orchestration of complex workflows
- continuous project maintenance
The result is a shift in abstraction level. Developers move from writing every component manually to supervising systems that co‑develop software alongside them.
What agent‑first development actually means
Agent‑first development describes a model in which AI agents operate as collaborators rather than passive assistants.
In a traditional IDE workflow:
the developer writes → the AI suggests
In an agent‑first workflow:
the developer defines intent → the agent executes strategy
This transition allows engineers to operate at a higher architectural level.
Instead of issuing narrow implementation commands such as:
“create a REST endpoint with validation”
Developers can express broader objectives like:
“implement a complete authentication system compatible with the existing architecture”
The agent interprets repository structure, dependencies, conventions and constraints before generating coherent solutions.
This fundamentally changes how programmers interact with codebases.
Conceptual architecture behind Google Antigravity
Although Google has not yet published full technical documentation for Antigravity, its behaviour aligns with emerging agent‑native development environment architectures.
These systems typically operate across several coordinated layers.
Intent interpretation layer
At this stage, the agent analyses:
- natural‑language instructions
- repository structure
- active dependencies
- project history
- architectural conventions
This enables context‑aware execution rather than isolated code generation.
Planning layer
Before producing code, the agent structures an execution strategy.
Typical responsibilities include:
- decomposing complex tasks
- identifying dependency conflicts
- proposing structural improvements
- estimating architectural impact
This reduces the risk of incremental inconsistencies common in manual workflows.
Execution layer
The agent then generates concrete artefacts such as:
- new source files
- refactored modules
- automated test suites
- migrations
- technical documentation
All changes remain synchronised with the active repository context.
Validation layer
Finally, the system evaluates:
- code coherence
- module compatibility
- architectural alignment
- runtime stability assumptions
This moves development closer to a semi‑autonomous engineering model.
How Antigravity differs from traditional IDEs
Google Antigravity is not simply another editor enhanced with AI capabilities.
It represents a structural change in how developers interact with software systems.
Key differences include the following.
From autocomplete to autonomous execution
Conventional IDEs suggest lines of code.
Antigravity executes complete implementation strategies.
From files to intent
Traditional editors operate at file level.
Antigravity operates at goal level.
From reactive assistance to active collaboration
Most AI tools respond only when prompted.
Agent‑native environments participate continuously in solution design.
From incremental productivity gains to exponential workflow acceleration
Automating entire development segments transforms how quickly complex systems can evolve.
This becomes especially relevant in large‑scale or fast‑moving projects.
Practical use cases for developers
Google Antigravity is designed to integrate naturally into modern engineering workflows where iteration speed is critical.
Several scenarios illustrate its immediate value.
Rapid prototyping
Developers can generate functional architectures in minutes rather than hours.
This accelerates:
- idea validation
- technical experimentation
- early product iteration
Legacy codebase refactoring
Agents can analyse internal dependencies and propose structural improvements across large repositories.
This is particularly useful in long‑lived enterprise projects.
Automated test generation
Testing remains one of the most persistent bottlenecks in professional development.
Agent‑native environments help maintain:
- continuous coverage
- regression protection
- incremental validation cycles
Living technical documentation
Agents can maintain documentation aligned with evolving codebases.
This significantly improves onboarding efficiency across engineering teams.
Comparison with other AI‑powered IDE environments
Google Antigravity enters an ecosystem that already includes tools such as Cursor, Copilot Workspace and emerging agent‑centric development platforms.
However, its positioning introduces important distinctions.
Compared with VS Code plus Copilot
Copilot enhances editing.
Antigravity transforms execution workflows.
Compared with Cursor
Cursor improves contextual editing interactions.
Antigravity restructures the development model itself.
Compared with experimental autonomous coding systems
Many current agent tools operate as external orchestration layers.
Antigravity integrates agents directly into the core environment.
This allows deeper architectural alignment and stronger repository awareness.
How Antigravity may reshape developer workflows
The most important impact of Antigravity is methodological rather than purely technical.
Developers shift from implementation‑centric roles towards supervision‑centric engineering.
In practice, engineers increasingly act as:
- system designers
- agent supervisors
- architectural strategists
This evolution enables smaller teams to deliver larger systems with fewer coordination bottlenecks.
It also encourages higher‑level thinking about structure, scalability and maintainability.
Strategic advantages for development teams
Adopting agent‑first environments can produce measurable improvements across engineering organisations.
Key advantages include:
Reduced development time
Automating repetitive implementation tasks frees cognitive capacity for higher‑value problem solving.
Improved architectural consistency
Agents help maintain structural patterns across repositories.
Easier technical scalability
Complex structural changes can be planned and executed more reliably.
Faster experimentation cycles
Teams can validate architectural decisions without significant upfront implementation investment.
These benefits are especially valuable in startup environments and innovation‑driven product teams.
Current limitations of agent‑native development environments
As with any emerging technology category, Antigravity introduces new challenges alongside its advantages.
Important considerations include:
Dependence on repository structure quality
Agents perform best when working within clearly organised projects.
Continued need for human oversight
Autonomy does not replace engineering judgement.
Expert review remains essential.
Organisational adaptation requirements
Transitioning to agent‑first workflows requires a shift in team mental models.
This adjustment can take time in traditionally structured engineering organisations.
Why Google Antigravity matters for the future of software development
Google rarely introduces developer tooling without a broader strategic trajectory.
Antigravity signals a shift from intelligent text editors towards collaborative engineering environments built around autonomous agents.
This transition implies:
- shorter development cycles
- reduced technical friction
- increased experimentation capacity
- new professional engineering skill profiles
Developers who understand this shift early gain a meaningful competitive advantage.
This is particularly true in environments where continuous innovation defines technical success.
Conclusion
Google Antigravity represents one of the first serious attempts to design an IDE from the ground up for agent‑assisted software engineering.
Rather than adding artificial intelligence to existing workflows, it redefines the relationship between developers and code.
Working within agent‑first environments enables teams to operate at higher abstraction levels, accelerate iteration cycles and reduce repetitive implementation effort.
As software engineering moves towards collaborative human‑agent systems, Antigravity is not simply another tool.
It is an early indicator of how professional development environments are likely to evolve over the coming years.
On Tuesday, March 19, the SEC issued joint guidance with the CFTC to “finally” provide clarity about how the securities laws apply to digital assets. On many issues, including staking and meme coins, the SEC’s new guidance is a welcome development and a marked improvement from the Gensler days. It also rightly acknowledges that the agency’s “regulation by enforcement” campaign under Chair Gensler had muddied compliance obligations and stifled the industry. But in important ways, the guidance stops short of the full course correction the crypto industry needs.
The biggest shortcoming is the SEC’s articulation of the Howey test for “investment contract” securities. All agree that most digital assets are not, on their own, investment contracts. Even the Gensler SEC (eventually) admitted as much, and the SEC’s new guidance reiterates that position. The key question, though, is when a digital asset is sold as part of an investment contract such that the sale becomes subject to the securities laws.
The statute provides the answer. As a matter of text, history and common sense, an “investment contract” means a contract – an express or implied agreement between the issuer and investor under which the issuer will deliver ongoing profits in return for the purchaser’s investment. Most digital assets are not investment contracts because they are not contracts. A digital asset can be the subject of an investment contract (like any other asset), but it can still be sold separately from the investment contract without implicating the securities laws. In the suits brought by Gensler, crypto companies vigorously defended that proper interpretation of the law.
Yet the SEC’s new guidance is silent about whether an investment contract requires contractual obligations. Instead, it says an investment contract travels with a digital asset (at least temporarily) when the “facts and circumstances” show the digital-asset developer “induc[ed] an investment of money in a common enterprise with representations or promises to undertake essential managerial efforts,” leading purchasers to “reasonably expect to derive profits.” That does not clearly confirm a clean break from the SEC’s former view that Howey eschews “contract law” and demands “a flexible application of the economic reality surrounding the offer, sale and entire scheme at issue, which may include a variety of promises, undertakings and corresponding expectations.”
The Gensler SEC’s know-it-when-I-see-it approach to Howey was deeply problematic. It allowed the agency to piece together an “investment contract” from various public statements by digital-asset developers — tweets, white papers, and other marketing materials — even absent concrete promises by the issuers. And it failed to distinguish securities from collectibles like Beanie Babies and trading cards, the value of which depends heavily on their maker’s marketing and attempts to create scarcity. The SEC missed an important opportunity to clearly reject that approach and restore a key statutory dividing line between assets and securities — a contract.
The SEC can still fix this problem, but to do so, it will need to further clarify how the agency intends to apply Howey going forward — and to finally make a clean break with Gensler’s overbroad interpretation of the securities laws. For example, the Gensler SEC repeatedly cited various “widely distributed promotional statements” as a basis for pushing a digital asset into the realm of investment contracts. The SEC’s new guidance puts some guardrails on that approach by requiring a developer’s representations or promises to be “explicit and unambiguous,” to “contain sufficient details,” and to occur before the purchase of the digital asset. But even that improved approach leaves too much room for interpretation. It could be expansively applied by private plaintiffs, the courts or a future SEC. Rather than continue down the path Gensler trod, the SEC should make clear that mere public statements affecting value are insufficient and that promises and representations must be made in the context of the specific sale at issue — not strung together from whitepapers or social-media posts that many purchasers likely never considered.
The SEC also should clarify its approach to secondary-market trading. Helpfully, the agency now recognizes that digital assets are not investment contracts “in perpetuity” just because they once were “subject to” investment contracts. But the agency also says that digital assets remain “subject to” investment contracts traded on secondary markets (like exchanges) so long as purchasers “reasonably expect” issuers’ “representations and promises to remain connected” to the asset. The SEC says little about how to assess those reasonable expectations, providing only two “non-exclusive” examples of when an investment contract “separates” from a digital asset. And it says nothing about whether a secondary-market purchaser must have a contractual relationship with the token issuer. That leaves it unclear whether the SEC has really moved on from the Gensler-era view that investment contracts “travel with” or are “embodied” by crypto tokens.
Instead of those mixed messages, the SEC should impose meaningful restraints on the application of the securities laws to secondary-market transactions by adopting Judge Analisa Torres’s approach in Ripple. Judge Torres recognized that it is unreasonable to infer an investment contract in the context of “blind bid-ask” transactions — that is, transactions where the counterparties do not know each other’s identities (as is common in secondary-market trading). Because buyers have no idea whether their money goes to a token’s issuer or to some unknown third party, they can’t reasonably expect that the seller will use the buyers’ money to generate and deliver profits. The SEC should endorse Judge Torres’s analysis expressly.
These are not academic quibbles. The current SEC might not read or enforce its new guidance in a manner that threatens the viability of the crypto industry in the United States. But by failing to clearly reject the excesses of the Gensler era, the SEC’s new guidance leaves the industry exposed to a future SEC that could leverage ambiguities in the SEC’s current guidance to resume regulation by enforcement. Private plaintiffs could try to do the same in lawsuits against key industry players (such as the leading exchanges). And in the meantime, the SEC’s interpretations could distort the securities-law baseline during negotiations over market-structure litigation.
The SEC invited comments on its guidance, and the industry should oblige. The SEC should get credit where credit is due. But the industry should not hesitate to highlight the lingering flaws and ambiguities in the agency’s approach and advocate for clear, meaningful, and permanent restraints to ensure regulatory clarity and stability. Simply giving the legal architecture of the last enforcement campaign a facelift is not enough.
For the first time in six years, the bitcoin hashrate, the total computational power securing the network, fell during the first quarter. It is currently down around 4% year to date, hovering around 1 zettahash per second (ZH/s).
Over the past five years, the rate has surged from roughly 100 exahashes per second (EH/s), a 10-fold increase, according to Glassnode data. Each year, the metric rose during the first quarter and ended with strong full-year growth in excess of 10%. In 2022, the figure almost doubled.
The AI Pivot
The shift in 2026 reflects changing economics across the bitcoin mining sector. With production costs near $90,000 per bitcoin and the spot price closer to $67,000, margins are negative. In response, many publicly listed miners are switching to artificial intelligence and high-performance computing infrastructure, where returns are higher and more predictable.
This transition is being funded through debt issuance and bitcoin sales, reducing reinvestment into bitcoin mining. As a result, hashrate growth is becoming more sensitive to the cryptocurrency’s price, with weaker prices likely to trigger further declines as smaller operators exit.
While a falling hashrate may raise concerns about network security, decentralization may matter more than absolute size. Publicly listed U.S. miners have accounted for over 40% of the global hash rate, and a reduction in their influence could lead to a more geographically distributed network. In that sense, the current shift may ultimately support decentralization.
Despite the slowdown, CoinShares still forecasts hashrate growth to around 1.8 ZH/s by the end of 2026, conditional on bitcoin recovering toward $100,000.
Read More: End of bitcoin ‘HODL’: public miners going all-in on AI, signaling more BTC selling
DeFi risk curator Steakhouse Financial has been hacked and its website and app are now being used to host a phishing scam.
Steakhouse disclosed the breach Monday morning and warned that any new users interacting with the website or app are likely interacting with a malicious version implemented by the hackers.
The attack appears to have affected just the front-end of operations, as Steakhouse assured users, “No deposits are at risk. No contracts are affected. All Steakhouse depositors are safe.”
Read more: Fake Uniswap phishing ad on Google steals trader’s life savings
“We are working to restore the frontend as soon as possible,” the firm said.
Steakhouse co-founder, Sébastien Derivaux, warned crypto users to avoid the website until further notice.
Various crypto firms offered alternative services and safety assurances for customers with funds at Steakhouse.
Others found humor in the incident, with one user asking, “Does phishing on Steakhouse make this a surf and turf attack?”
At the time of writing, neither Steakhouse Financial or its CEO have shared any further updates on the incident.
Steakhouse Financial housing a crypto drainer
Crypto security firm Blockaid claims that the Steakhouse attackers are utilizing code from one of the “largest active wallet drainer operations onchain” known as Angelferno, or Angel Drainer.
Read more: Fears of $27M Venus Protocol hack turn out to be phishing attack on power user
Earlier this month, AI crypto firm GAIB fell victim to a social engineering scheme that gave hackers access to its domain, where they implemented a copycat website kitted with Angelferno.
Drainers work by stealing a user’s crypto after they sign a malicious transaction that gives hackers full access to withdraw their funds.
Blockaid was able to help GAIB detect the malware, and the malicious site was gone in roughly seven hours, with no apparent user losses.
Got a tip? Send us an email securely via Protos Leaks. For more informed news and investigations, follow us on X, Bluesky, and Google News, or subscribe to our YouTube channel.
This month, Bitcoin’s hashrate fell 6% after the US and Israel attacked Iran, highlighting Iran’s significant crypto mining activity.
Bitcoin price, meanwhile, remains lackluster. Higher 4% yields on US Treasury bonds have added pressure, and investors are seeking less risky prospects amid geopolitical tension.
Less appetite for crypto trading has proven problematic for Robinhood. The trading platform’s stock is down 16% on the month, and leadership has announced a stock buyback program.
Prediction markets marked a record number of transactions, representing a more than 2,800% increase since this time last year.
Here’s March by the numbers:
Bitcoin lacks momentum as 4% US Treasury bond yields put pressure on price
Yields on five-year US Treasury bonds are up 4% in March, putting pressure on Bitcoin price. While showing some gains in mid March, the asset ended the month much where it started, around $67,000.
As per an analysis from Cointelegraph, fears of a drawn-out conflict between the US and Israel against Iran have led investors to cut out risk. A sell-off in bonds, along with a nine-month high of 4% in yields, suggests that traders are building cash positions.
Bitcoin hashrate falls nearly 6% after US and Israel attack Iran
On Feb. 28, the United States and Israel launched a joint special military operation in Iran called “Operation Epic Fury.” One month later, the Bitcoin (BTC) hashrate is down almost 6%.
Bloomberg crypto and digital assets strategist Dushyant Shahrawat said in a recent interview that Iran is one of the world’s largest Bitcoin miners, accounting for some 6-8% of global hashrate, and 70% of mining activities are conducted by the military.
Disruptions to the country’s energy infrastructure and diversion of military priorities to defense have thus hit Iran’s ability to mine Bitcoin.
Prediction market transaction top 192 million
Transactions on prediction markets like Polymarket and Kalshi topped 192 million in March. That represents a 24% increase from last month and a 2,880% increase compared to the same time last year, according to Dune analytics.
Related: Lawmakers push another bill to curb prediction market insider trading
Prediction markets are growing in popularity, but in the United States, they face state regulators who say they facilitate a form of gambling. At least 11 states have taken legal action against them.
On March 20, Carson City District Court Judge Jason Woodbury upheld a regulator’s move to temporarily ban prediction market Kalshi in Nevada.
Arizona has brought criminal charges against Kalshi for allegedly “running an illegal gambling operation and taking bets on Arizona elections, both of which violate Arizona law.”
Other states like Utah and Pennsylvania are currently considering legislation that would bring prediction markets under state gambling or gaming laws. Kalshi says that it answers only to federal regulation under the Commodity Futures Exchange Commission (CFTC).
Euro-denominated stablecoins account for 85% of non-dollar volume
Stablecoins backed by the euro have emerged as a favorite alternative to assets backed by US dollars. Some 85% of non-dollar stablecoin volumes occur in euros, according to a March report from Dune.
While euro-denominated coins initially only represented some 50-70% of the non-dollar market, they began expanding significantly in 2024. Now they represent 85% of total transferred volume. Euro stablecoins are also dominant in regard to participation, with user share rising to over 78%.
Dune attributes this increase to more confidence in stablecoins among institutions, thanks in large part to the Markets in Crypto-Assets regulatory package (MiCA).
Robinhood stock down 16% on month
Robinhood stock has decreased over 16% in March, from nearly $80 to $66 as of publishing time.
The stock and crypto trading company’s share price has been struggling in recent months. Over the last six months, it dropped over 50%. Uncertainty over the regulation of new verticals like prediction markets and social trading, along with a collapse in crypto trading revenues are creating structural obstacles for the company.
Revenue from crypto transactions reportedly dropped 38% year-over-year as of Q4 2025. Crypto app volumes dropped 58%.
To address the problem, Robinhood has approved a $1.5 billion share buyback program in March, which will execute over the next three years.
Strategy’s Bitcoin holdings are 11% in the red
Amid a lackluster price action on the month, Strategy’s Bitcoin portfolio is at an 11% loss. The average cost of Bitcoin in its portfolio is $75,669. Bitcoin is trading around $67,800 at publishing time.
Still, the company has continued its regular Bitcoin purchases. It made two this month: one for 17,994 Bitcoin on March 9 and another for 22,337 Bitcoin on March 16, amounting to roughly $2.7 billion at publishing time.
The software company has financed most of its Bitcoin purchases through high-yield stock offerings, like Stretch (STRC). This allows the company to buy Bitcoin without diluting its MSTR common shares.
The company’s chair, Bitcoin bull Michael Saylor, said recently that 80% of STRC buyers are retail investors. “Retail investors prefer low-volatility, high-yield digital credit,” he said.
Magazine: XRP yet to ‘price in’ 3 bullish catalysts, Bitcoin to $80K? Trade Secrets
Brent crude punched through $116 a barrel on March 30, 2026 – a 60% monthly surge driven by escalating US-Iran tensions after Tehran accused Washington of preparing an invasion, compounding Houthi strike disruptions, and Bitcoin is now sitting in the crosshairs of the resulting institutional risk-off rotation.
The oil price spike is not hitting crypto directly; it’s hitting it through three compounding channels: inflation re-acceleration, delayed Fed rate cuts, and a geopolitical risk premium that is draining leveraged long exposure across every risk asset class.
Bitcoin dropped to weekly lows between $63,000 and $65,700, over $500 million in derivatives liquidations hit the tape, and 84% of that came from long positions.
The Fear & Greed Index collapsed to 28 – Extreme Fear – while a record $14 billion options expiry amplified the volatility.
Discover: The best crypto to diversify your portfolio with
Bitcoin Faces Structural Deleveraging as Oil-Driven Inflation Rewrites the Fed Playbook
$63,000 is the line Bitcoin cannot afford to lose.
That level has capped the downside through the prior 2 macro shock episodes. The 200-day moving average sits just below at $62,400.
A close beneath it would be the first since the October 2025 rally began and would likely trigger a second wave of systematic deleveraging from quant funds running momentum strategies. Resistance above is layered at $67,500 and $71,000, both former support zones that flipped during the February selloff.
The oil correlation matters more than usual right now. Binance Research puts the Bitcoin-WTI correlation near zero across most market regimes.
The 30-day rolling correlation currently sits at just 0.15. But that changes during extreme disruption events. The Strait of Hormuz is flowing at roughly 4 million barrels per day against a normal 20 million. That is not a tail risk. That is an active structural supply shock, exactly the kind that produces temporary correlation spikes.
If US-Iran tensions de-escalate and Hormuz flows normalize, Brent retreats below $100 and the Fed signals patience at its April 1 to 2 meeting. Bitcoin reclaims $67,500, BlackRock’s IBIT builds on its $225.2 million inflow during the dip, and institutional rotation flips back into accumulation mode.
If tensions persist without full escalation, Brent holds $110 to $116 and the Fed stays hawkish through Q2. Bitcoin grinds between $63,000 and $68,000 with elevated volatility, ETF flows stay choppy, and mining costs for operators like Marathon Digital rise 15 to 25%.
“The United States of America is in serious discussions with A NEW, AND MORE REASONABLE, REGIME to end our Military Operations in Iran.” – President Donald J. Trump
pic.twitter.com/0MWL2hSNmK
— The White House (@WhiteHouse) March 30, 2026
A full Hormuz blockade is the scenario nobody wants to price. Oil above $130, 10-year Treasury yields breaking above 5%, and the Fed forced to choose between fighting inflation and supporting growth.
That combination could send Bitcoin to $55,000 to $57,000 in a full risk-off liquidation wave, mirroring February 2022 when WTI hit $115 and BTC fell from $45,000 to $39,000 in days.
The inflation channel is what most traders are underweighting. Sustained oil above $100 does not just pressure sentiment. It mechanically delays rate cuts.
Bitcoin’s slide below $67,000 alongside rising Treasury yields already showed how directly that linkage bites. BTC’s 0.9 correlation to the IGV tech index means it trades like a rate-sensitive growth asset in the short run, not an inflation hedge.
Watch the Fed’s April 1 to 2 meeting. Any language signaling a longer hold is the catalyst for the next leg down. Congressional votes on Iran sanctions expected mid-April carry equal weight. Further Hormuz disruption sends another shock through energy markets and straight into institutional risk appetite.
Discover: The best pre-launch token sales
The post Oil at $116: Why This Macro Shock Could Trigger a Bitcoin Risk-Off Deleveraging appeared first on Cryptonews.
BitMine Immersion Technologies (BMNR) made its largest weekly purchase of either (ETH) this year, adding 71,179 ETH and extending a month-long ramp-up in buying even as crypto prices remain under pressure.
The purchase, worth roughly $143 million at current prices, lifted the company’s total holdings to over 4.73 million ETH, about 3.92% of the token’s supply, according to a Monday update. BitMine has now increased its buying pace for four straight weeks, stepping up from a prior average of 45,000 to 50,000 ETH.
The move stands out as most other large digital asset treasuries (DAT) halted crypto accumulation or even sold tokens during the crypto market downturn. Strategy (MSTR), the largest corporate bitcoin owner, was the only other major buyer in the recent months, and even the Michael Sayler-led company refrained, breaking a 13-week buying streak.
Bitmine Chairman Thomas “Tom” Lee said the firm continues to see the current market as the final phase of a downturn as rising oil prices and geopolitical tensions keep risk assets under pressure.
The company’s total crypto and cash holdings stood at $10.7 billion. In addition to its ETH treasury, BitMine held 197 bitcoin, and $961 million in cash and equity stakes, including $102 million in Eightco Holdings.
Digital asset investment products posted their first weekly outflows in over a month, as a mix of geopolitical tensions and shifting monetary policy expectations rattled investor confidence.
According to the latest data, crypto funds saw $414 million in net outflows, marking a sharp reversal after five consecutive weeks of inflows.
Crypto Funds Lost $414 Million Last Week
The pullback coincided with rising tensions tied to the Iran conflict and a notable shift in expectations around the Federal Reserve, as markets pivot from anticipating rate cuts to pricing in potential hikes.
The US accounted for the bulk of the outflows, with $445 million exiting digital asset funds, highlighting a decisive risk-off stance among American investors.
In contrast, European markets showed signs of opportunistic buying. Investors in Germany and Canada added $21.2 million and $15.9 million, respectively, suggesting confidence in long-term valuations despite short-term volatility.
Among individual assets, Ethereum was hit hardest, recording $222 million in outflows. The move pushed its year-to-date flows into negative territory, reflecting sustained pressure that analysts link in part to regulatory uncertainty surrounding the Clarity Act.
Bitcoin also faced headwinds, shedding $194 million during the week. However, it continues to show resilience, maintaining a strong $964 million in net inflows for the year so far.
This suggests that while short-term sentiment has weakened, institutional conviction in Bitcoin remains intact.
In contrast, XRP stood out as a rare gainer, attracting $15.8 million in inflows. Its performance positions it as a relatively safe haven within the digital asset space during periods of broader market stress.
The latest fund flow data shows how quickly sentiment in crypto markets can shift when macroeconomic and geopolitical risks converge, leaving investors to reassess their exposure in an increasingly uncertain environment.
The post Geopolitics and the Fed Flush $414 Million From Crypto Funds in a Week appeared first on BeInCrypto.
Key takeaways
-
Hong Kong’s 2026-27 budget marks a shift from experimental digital bond projects to the direct integration of tokenized issuance and settlement into the city’s regulated financial market infrastructure.
-
CMU OmniClear, a subsidiary of the Hong Kong Monetary Authority, will build a digital asset platform to support tokenized bond issuance and settlement. This embeds digital securities within Hong Kong’s established clearing and post-trade framework.
-
Hong Kong has issued multiple tokenized government bonds, including a HK$10 billion digital bond in 2025. Authorities plan to make such offerings a regular feature to deepen market participation and improve liquidity.
-
Hong Kong is introducing stablecoin licensing, digital asset dealer and custodian regulations and compliance rules aligned with global tax transparency standards to support a fully regulated digital asset market.
For years, tokenized bonds were discussed as a future upgrade to capital markets. In Hong Kong, that transition is now moving into practice.
The city’s 2026-27 budget marks a pivotal turning point. Tokenization is no longer confined to isolated experiments but is being integrated into the heart of Hong Kong’s financial ecosystem. By embedding issuance and settlement directly into its post-trade systems, the city is moving beyond one-off digital deals to create a standardized, regulated environment.
This article explores how Hong Kong is integrating tokenized bonds into its financial infrastructure through a new digital platform developed by CMU OmniClear, a subsidiary of the Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA), regular government issuances and supportive regulations. This development reflects a shift from experimental pilots to scalable, institutional-grade digital capital market systems.
Hong Kong’s advancing tokenized bond program
Hong Kong has already completed several rounds of tokenized government bond issuances. In Q4 2025, the government launched its third series, valued at HK$10 billion, approximately US$1.28 billion. Authorities have since confirmed that these tokenized bond offerings will continue on a regular basis.
The 2026-27 budget, however, marked a significant escalation.
Financial Secretary Paul Chan stated that CMU OmniClear Holdings, a wholly owned subsidiary of the HKMA, will develop a dedicated digital asset platform. The platform is designed to handle both the issuance and settlement of tokenized bonds.
Importantly, the system is being built with long-term expansion in mind. It will:
-
Be progressively extended to support a wider range of digital assets beyond government bonds
-
Establish interoperability with tokenization platforms in other regional jurisdictions
-
Become fully integrated into Hong Kong’s broader post-trade financial ecosystem
This final aspect, deep integration into core market infrastructure, is what elevates tokenization from experimental pilots to a foundational element of the financial system.
CMU OmniClear: From experiment to core infrastructure
CMU OmniClear is far from a standalone startup or proof-of-concept project. It operates as an integral part of Hong Kong’s established clearing and settlement framework. Regulators have entrusted tokenized bond settlement to an entity directly linked to the HKMA. They have integrated digital securities into the same system that already processes conventional financial instruments.
This strategic move reshapes the tokenization story in three key ways:
-
Standardization replaces experimentation: Rather than relying on custom-built, one-off digital bond structures, issuance and settlement can now follow uniform regulatory rules and proven operational protocols.
-
Clear regulatory oversight: With supervision anchored directly under the central banking authority, legal and compliance uncertainty is significantly reduced.
-
Built-in scalability: Core market infrastructure is designed to handle institutional-scale volumes, not just small-scale trials or limited pilots.
Tokenization is no longer an add-on or side project. It is becoming embedded in the core plumbing of Hong Kong’s financial system.
Did you know? The concept of tokenized bonds builds on the broader idea of tokenizing real-world assets (RWAs). Trillions of dollars’ worth of traditional financial assets, such as bonds, real estate and funds, could eventually move onto blockchain-based infrastructure.
Government issuance: Already scaling
Hong Kong’s tokenized bond program is already demonstrating meaningful scale. Rather than building infrastructure in anticipation of future demand, Hong Kong is responding to existing market interest.
The government’s third tokenized bond issuance, completed in late 2025, reached a record size of HK$10 billion, approximately US$1.28 billion to US$1.3 billion, marking the world’s largest digital bond offering to date. This followed earlier digital bond issuances that also attracted strong investor demand. Authorities have now pledged to make tokenized bond issuance a regular practice rather than relying on occasional pilots.
This steady approach delivers several key benefits:
-
Builds investor comfort and familiarity with tokenized products
-
Draws participation from conventional asset managers
-
Reinforces that tokenization has strong official policy support, moving it beyond experimental status
Consistent and predictable issuance is essential to developing deeper, more liquid markets.
Beyond bonds: Building a digital asset ecosystem
Hong Kong’s ambitions extend well beyond tokenized bonds. The 2026-27 budget outlines additional regulatory steps to foster a broader digital asset ecosystem.
Stablecoin licensing regime
The HKMA is moving toward issuing its inaugural set of licenses for fiat-referenced stablecoins, with the first approvals expected in early 2026.
The licensing assessments emphasize:
-
The strength and quality of asset reserves
-
Robust risk management practices
-
Effective anti-money laundering (AML) and compliance controls
-
Well-defined, legitimate use cases
Stablecoins are not inherently tied to bond settlement. However, the introduction of regulated digital fiat equivalents could enable compliant and efficient settlement mechanisms for tokenized securities and other digital assets.
Did you know? The first blockchain bond issued by a multilateral institution was launched by the World Bank in 2018. Called “Bond-i” (Blockchain Operated New Debt Instrument), it used distributed ledger technology to manage bond issuance and settlement.
Licensing for digital asset dealers and custodians
Hong Kong is advancing its regulatory framework by introducing dedicated licensing regimes for key digital asset service providers.
The government plans to table legislation in 2026 establishing licensing requirements for:
-
digital asset dealing platforms, including over-the-counter (OTC) brokers, block traders, and other intermediaries involved in buying, selling, or exchanging virtual assets
-
custodian service providers focused on safeguarding private keys, segregating client assets, and ensuring strong security and operational controls
These measures will bring a broader range of participants under formal supervision. Dealers will face standards comparable to those applied to conventional securities firms, while custodians will be subject to stringent requirements for asset protection and key management.
By covering issuance, trading, custody, and reporting activities, the regime creates a fully supervised ecosystem for tokenized bond markets and other digital securities, enhancing investor protection and market integrity.
Alignment with global tax transparency standards
To reinforce its commitment to international compliance, Hong Kong is amending the Inland Revenue Ordinance to adopt the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development’s (OECD) Crypto-Asset Reporting Framework (CARF).
The implementation will apply to reporting by crypto-asset service providers (CASPs), starting in 2027. Information exchanges would begin in 2028, enabling the automatic exchange of tax-related data on crypto transactions with partner jurisdictions.
The move underscores a clear policy stance. Hong Kong’s tokenized and digital asset markets are being designed to be fully interoperable, transparent, and aligned with global standards. These are essential prerequisites for attracting and retaining institutional capital on a sustainable basis.
Did you know? Traditional bond settlement often takes two business days (T+2) in many markets. Tokenized bonds could potentially enable near-instant settlement, reducing counterparty risk and freeing up capital more quickly.
The liquidity layer: Building deeper regulated crypto markets
In early 2026, the Hong Kong Securities and Futures Commission (SFC) issued new guidance enabling licensed virtual asset brokers to provide margin financing for digital assets. Initially, the framework focused on Bitcoin (BTC) and Ether (ETH) collateral, with safeguards for creditworthy clients. The SFC also published a high-level framework allowing licensed virtual asset trading platforms (VATPs) to offer leveraged perpetual contracts.
These developments significantly enhance market liquidity in a controlled manner while preserving strong investor protections and risk management standards. They form part of a multilayered strategy to:
-
Broaden the scope of regulated digital asset markets
-
Uphold institutional-grade guardrails and compliance
-
More seamlessly bridge digital and traditional finance
Tokenized bonds are not standalone experiments. They sit within a comprehensive, integrated digital financial architecture designed for scale and sustainability.
How tokenized bond infrastructure operates in practice
Tokenized bond infrastructure combines several interconnected layers built on blockchain or distributed ledger technology:
-
Issuance: The issuer originates the bond as a digital token directly on a permissioned or regulated ledger, embedding coupon terms, maturity and covenants into smart contracts or digital records.
-
Primary allocation: Subscriptions and allocations occur through regulated intermediaries, such as banks, brokers or platforms, ensuring Know Your Customer (KYC) and AML compliance and orderly distribution to qualified investors.
-
Settlement and custody: True delivery-versus-payment (DvP) is achieved through integrated systems managed by recognized market infrastructure providers, including central securities depositories or clearing houses adapted for tokenization. Custody is handled by licensed providers with segregated assets and secure key management.
-
Post-trade lifecycle: Ongoing events, such as coupon or interest payments, principal redemptions at maturity, and the handling of corporate actions, are automated through programmable logic. This reduces manual intervention, settlement risk and operational costs.
The critical distinction between early pilots and true infrastructure lies in repeatability, institutional integration, and scale. Mature infrastructure enables frequent, large-volume issuances while interfacing smoothly with existing clearing, settlement, custody and reporting systems. This creates the foundation for liquid, efficient secondary markets.
Why this matters for global markets
Hong Kong’s strategy reflects deliberate, long-term positioning in the changing financial sector.
By integrating tokenized bond issuance and settlement into infrastructure closely aligned with the central bank, and by fostering connectivity with regional platforms and counterparties, Hong Kong is working to:
-
Solidify its status as Asia’s leading regulated digital asset and tokenized securities hub
-
Channel meaningful cross-border institutional capital flows into and through the city
-
Offer institutional investors a compliant, scalable and well-regulated tokenization ecosystem
Hong Kong is competing on regulated reliability, predictable rule-making and institutional-grade infrastructure. These factors matter significantly to large asset managers, banks and sovereign wealth funds.
Prevailing risks and challenges
Implementing ambitious infrastructure does not automatically eliminate structural challenges. Several significant hurdles remain:
-
Achieving genuine interoperability across different tokenization platforms, protocols and ledgers
-
Securing legal and regulatory harmonization with other major jurisdictions to enable smooth cross-border issuance, trading and settlement
-
Keeping AML, KYC, sanctions and broader compliance frameworks aligned with the rapid pace of technological change
-
Avoiding liquidity fragmentation, where trading volumes are split inefficiently across siloed digital systems, undermining market depth
Building the digital financial rails is only the first phase. Sustained market adoption, active secondary trading, broad institutional participation and organic liquidity growth will determine whether Hong Kong’s vision translates into lasting global relevance.
Cointelegraph maintains full editorial independence. Guides are produced without influence from advertisers, partners or commercial relationships. Content published in Guides does not constitute financial, legal or investment advice. Readers should conduct their own research and consult qualified professionals where appropriate.
Disclosure: This article does not represent investment advice. The content and materials featured on this page are for educational purposes only.
Exolix gains traction in 2026 as developers seek fast, reliable crypto exchange API solutions.
As the crypto ecosystem grows, infrastructure is now an essential part of every product, from crypto wallets and exchanges to fintech applications and web3 projects. Most products rely on APIs to support key functionalities such as price feeds, access to liquidity, and transaction execution. As such, finding the best crypto API is no longer a choice but a necessity.
However, the best crypto API remains a concern for many projects and teams. The best crypto API depends on a few key factors: ease of integration, reliability, and the speed at which the product can be deployed without having to build complex infrastructure from scratch.
Exolix is emerging as one of the best crypto exchange API providers in the market in 2026 by addressing the key requirements of the crypto ecosystem. It offers the best crypto API due to its fast deployment capabilities, which provide developers with the best way to integrate crypto swap functionalities into their products. As such, the Exolix crypto exchange API is the best choice for teams seeking the best crypto API for startups.
What Is Exolix API?
Exolix API is a crypto infrastructure product that enables developers to add instant exchange capabilities to their applications. Instead of developing complicated exchange systems or dealing with the intricacies of working with multiple liquidity providers, developers can integrate with Exolix and allow users to exchange cryptocurrencies within the interface.
This makes Exolix API one of the best crypto exchange APIs, especially for projects that wish to add crypto-to-crypto exchange capabilities to their applications.
The API is also lightweight and easy to implement. Some of the key functionalities that can be integrated using the API are as follows:
- execution of crypto swaps across various assets
- real-time calculation of the rate
- tracking of the status of transactions
- cross exchange support
This simplicity also makes Exolix one of the best crypto APIs for startups, as the teams involved in the development of the startups need to launch the projects as soon as possible without having to spend much time and resources on the development of the back end.
Another significant factor related to the API is the non-custodial nature of the API. This means that the users are in full control of the money during the exchange process, which is also in line with the current trend of moving towards more decentralized and user-friendly financial tools.
Why Exolix Is One of the Best Crypto API Providers in 2026
As the number of crypto infrastructure providers grows, the line between an excellent API and the best crypto API comes down to usability, reliability, and performance in the real world. Exolix, in 2026, stands out as an API that focuses on the practical needs of developers, ease of integration, execution, and support.
While some APIs are difficult to set up or require significant technical expertise, Exolix has been created to be simple to use, and this is just one reason it is often considered to be among the best crypto APIs, especially for startups and growing web3 products.
Easy API integration
One of the key advantages of Exolix is the ability of the developers to get started as quickly as possible. This is because the API is quite straightforward.
Developers can explore integration on the developers page.
The key advantages of integrating with Exolix are:
- Simple request and response structure
- Quick onboarding process
- No need to build exchange infrastructure
- Ability to integrate with xisting apps and wallets
This makes Exolix a strong contender for the best crypto exchange API, especially for development purposes.
24/7 Technical Support
Another key aspect in selecting the top API for crypto is reliable support. This is because, in the event of any problems related to swaps, rates, or integration, user experience is affected.
Exolix offers technical support around the clock, enabling teams to quickly address any problems, ensuring optimal performance.
This is especially useful for:
- Startups with small engineering teams
- Platforms with users in different time zones
- Platforms that need to be available 24/7
Integration and Revenue Opportunities
Exolix is constantly improving its API infrastructure to ensure ease of integration for wallets, apps, and crypto platforms to include non-custodial cross-chain swaps in their products. This API is flexible and simple to implement to ensure ease of integration for our partners.
Revenue Share Model
One of the main advantages of integrating with Exolix is our revenue share model. This model ensures our partners receive a share of revenue from swaps done on their platforms. This creates an additional revenue source for our partners.
This means our partners can:
- Monetize their current user base
- Create an additional revenue source
- Improve their products without adding operational overhead
Integration assistance for Developers
Apart from that, Exolix is also offering assistance during the integration process itself. This is going to help teams that may not have the best knowledge of the underlying crypto infrastructure.
The assistance that is going to be available during the integration process is as follows:
- Guidance on implementing the API
- Troubleshooting during the setup process
- Optimization hints for the best performance
- Assistance with edge cases during transactions
This is going to help Exolix become one of the best crypto APIs around.
Key use cases for Exolix API
The flexibility of Exolix makes it perfect for various crypto products. Whether it is developing a crypto wallet, exchange, or any other related application, the right crypto API can help to achieve new heights without adding complexity to the development process.
Exolix is all about simplicity and compatibility, and this is why it is used in various applications that demand timely development and user experience. This is why it is considered one of the best crypto APIs for startups.
Wallet Integration
Crypto wallets are one of the most common applications of the Exolix API. The swap feature is integrated into the user interface of the wallet, allowing the user to swap assets without exiting the application. This is a great way to retain the user and provide a richer experience.
Exchange and trading platforms
For projects that need instant swaps without the hassle of building their own trading engine, Exolix is available as a backend solution. This is the reason Exolix is considered one of the best crypto exchange APIs available today.
Web3 and DeFi applications
Decentralized applications may utilize Exolix, which offers the possibility of cross-chain swaps as well as the moving of assets between different chains.
Startup products and MVPs
For early-stage teams, the key is speed, and Exolix helps teams launch their products quickly by not requiring them to develop from scratch.
This makes Exolix an excellent choice among the best crypto APIs for startups, especially when developing:
- MVPs
- Early product tests
- Quick iteration cycles
With the ability to accommodate multiple use cases with a single integration, Exolix offers a scalable base for various types of crypto products at different stages of development.
FAQ
What is Exolix API?
Exolix API is a product that serves as a solution for building a cryptocurrency infrastructure that can facilitate instant cryptocurrency exchange. The API can be used by developers to add instant cryptocurrency exchange capabilities to their platforms.
Why is Exolix considered one of the best crypto APIs?
Exolix API is regarded as one of the best free crypto APIs because it is simple, has a quick onboarding process, and is reliable. The API has a feature that allows users to make cross-chain swaps, has clear documentation, and is available 24/7. These features make it a feasible choice for both new and old cryptocurrency products.
Is Exolix suitable for startups?
Yes, Exolix is an excellent choice in the list of the top-rated APIs in the cryptocurrency industry. It is an excellent choice for startups that want to launch their project without the need to build their exchange infrastructure. This way, the startup can save time and money while still providing the feature of cryptocurrency swaps.
Does Exolix API require complex integration?
No, one of the biggest advantages of using Exolix is that it is easy to integrate. The API is easy to use and has a simple structure. Moreover, there is support available during the integration process. A developer can easily start using the API with the documentation provided on the official website.
What can you build with Exolix API?
The Exolix API is an excellent choice for developers who want to create different cryptocurrency-related products such as wallets, exchange interfaces, and Web 3 applications. It is also used to add instant swap functionality, which makes it one of the top-rated cryptocurrency exchange API solutions.
Disclosure: This content is provided by a third party. Neither crypto.news nor the author of this article endorses any product mentioned on this page. Users should conduct their own research before taking any action related to the company.
What should you wear to the Masters? A guide for women
CachyOS emerges as a fast, gaming-ready Arch Linux OS alternative
Man warned pals ‘it will go with a bang’ before fatal house explosion after rent increase
-
NewsBeat5 days agoManchester United reach agreement with Casemiro over contract clause amid transfer speculation
-
News Videos5 days agoParliament publishes latest register of MPs’ financial interests
-
NewsBeat3 days agoThe Story hosts event on Durham’s historic registers
-
Business4 days agoInstagram, YouTube Found Responsible for Teen’s Mental Health Struggle in Historic Ruling
-
NewsBeat5 days agoTesco is selling new Cadbury Dairy Milk bar and people can’t wait to try it
-
Tech7 days agoSamsung will soon let you control smart home devices from your car’s dashboard
-
Entertainment2 days agoLana Del Rey Celebrates Her Husband’s 51st Birthday In New Post
-
Fashion6 days agoDoes It Matter What You Wear When You’re Laid Off and Looking?
-
Business6 days agoMore women enter wealth management, but few in advisory roles: study
-
NewsBeat7 days agoColombian military plane with 110 soldiers onboard crashes following takeoff
-
Politics7 days agoHow Media Platforms Balance Performance and Accessibility in Image Delivery
-
NewsBeat6 days agoNASA Artemis II Astronauts enter 14-Day quarantine as moon rocket reaches launchpad
-
NewsBeat6 days agoEntrepreneurs Forum survey reveals optimism in North East
-
Business6 days agoLate-paying firms face multimillion-pound fines under new crackdown
-
Tech4 days agoIntercom’s new post-trained Fin Apex 1.0 beats GPT-5.4 and Claude Sonnet 4.6 at customer service resolutions
-
Sports5 days agoFantasy Baseball Week 1 Preview: Top sleeper hitters for both five- and 12-day period led by Munetaka Murakami
-
Tech5 days agoUS FCC Prohibits Approval Of New Foreign-Made Consumer Routers
-
Crypto World6 days agoBTC gives up $70,000 level as markets mull higher interest rates
-
Tech6 days agoEmbedding compliance in AI adoption
-
Fashion6 days agoCoffee Break: Korean Skincare Set
You must be logged in to post a comment Login