Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin has outlined a renewed technical direction for the network in a new “Lean Ethereum” strawmap, placing quantum resistance, scalability, and privacy at the top of Ethereum’s priorities for the coming years. In a post on X, Buterin said the roadmap is designed to be rolled out over the next three to four years and to span “nearly every layer” of the ecosystem.
Buterin compared the expected breadth of change to the September 2022 “Merge,” when Ethereum shifted away from energy-intensive mining to a proof-of-stake consensus mechanism. The updated plan also comes as Ethereum Foundation restructuring efforts are ongoing, following recent staffing cuts intended to reduce spending and streamline operations.
Key takeaways
“Lean Ethereum” prioritizes quantum safety, scaling improvements, and stronger privacy, with changes planned across most parts of the stack.
Buterin says quantum safety has become a much higher priority and that finalizing a quantum-safe approach for “blobs” is now urgent.
Privacy is described as a “first class goal,” alongside efforts to expand programmable privacy and scalability.
Several Ethereum Foundation departures and a reported ~20% staff reduction have raised questions about delivery timelines.
Critics argue the three-to-four-year window may be too slow and question whether the Ethereum Foundation can meet the proposed schedule.
Quantum safety and “Lean” upgrades across Ethereum
Buterin’s post frames “Lean Ethereum” as a long-running technical roadmap that begins in 2026 and extends through 2029, according to the strawmap hosted on Strawmap.org. The thrust is not a single upgrade, but a coordinated sequence of work meant to address multiple categories of risk and performance constraints.
One of the most urgent elements, according to Buterin, is quantum safety. He stated that “quantum safety has shifted up a LOT in priority,” and specifically flagged the need to finalize a quantum-safe solution for Ethereum’s “blobs.” While the details of that solution were not described in the article, Buterin’s emphasis suggests Ethereum is accelerating preparation for a future in which quantum computing could threaten today’s cryptographic assumptions.
Scalability remains another central theme. Buterin linked the roadmap to architectural improvements that touch the network broadly, echoing the scale of the Merge as an analogy for how disruptive but necessary the coming work could be.
Advertisement
Privacy moves from feature to priority
Alongside quantum safety and scalability, privacy has been elevated to the top tier of Ethereum’s objectives. Buterin said privacy has become a “first class goal,” signaling that privacy considerations are no longer expected to be an optional add-on for niche use cases.
Buterin also pushed for work on a new virtual machine design—described as similar to “leanISA or RISC-V”—intended to support programmable privacy and improve scalability. The thrust of this idea is to make privacy-related logic more adaptable at the protocol level, while continuing to address throughput and efficiency constraints that have historically shaped Ethereum’s upgrade path.
Ethereum Foundation restructuring adds delivery pressure
The timing of “Lean Ethereum” matters as Ethereum Foundation operations are undergoing changes. Earlier coverage noted that the Ethereum Foundation cut roughly 20% of its staff last month as part of an effort to become leaner and reduce its budget by 40%. The broader reorganization has also included executive departures in recent months, including Hsiao-Wei Wang and Tomasz Stańczak.
Protocol contributor exits were also reported. In May, Tim Beiko and Barnabé Monnot left, adding to a recent pattern of personnel changes.
Advertisement
From an investor and developer perspective, the key issue is not the concept of a new roadmap—Ethereum has repeatedly used multi-year upgrade plans—but the practical question of execution capacity. Roadmaps often collide with staffing, coordination bandwidth, and cross-client implementation realities, especially when multiple layers are expected to evolve in parallel.
Debate over whether the timeline is realistic
While some researchers praised the direction, the proposed three-to-four-year window drew immediate skepticism from others. Dankrad Feist, a researcher behind the payments-focused layer-1 Tempo blockchain, said the plan was positive but argued that the schedule may be too slow. He suggested that AI could help developers ship upgrades within a year.
Crypto analyst Ignas Fiodorovas also supported the general goals but raised doubt about whether the Ethereum Foundation can deliver within Buterin’s timeframe, citing what he described as a history of missed deadlines. Importantly, his critique focused less on the technical ambition and more on execution risk—how likely teams are to complete complex protocol changes on schedule.
Fiodorovas also pointed out a perceived omission from the strawmap: improved tokenomics for Ether (ETH). In the article’s reporting, he connected that gap to ongoing downward pressure on ETH’s price amid a broader market downturn, implying that even a technically successful roadmap may not directly satisfy market expectations in the near term.
Advertisement
These tensions highlight a recurring dynamic in large-scale blockchain roadmaps. Technical upgrades can strengthen the network’s long-term security and usability, but token performance, governance priorities, and deliverable milestones often remain coupled in traders’ minds—particularly when the community expects ecosystem-wide “leaning” to translate into clearer value capture or incentives.
Looking ahead, readers should watch for clarification on how Ethereum intends to finalize a quantum-safe approach for blobs and what specific milestones are attached to the 2026–2029 strawmap. The next signal to monitor will be whether the Foundation’s reorganized structure—and the teams implementing across multiple clients and layers—can convert the roadmap into measurable, time-bound deliverables.
Risk & affiliate notice: Crypto assets are volatile and capital is at risk. This article may contain affiliate links. Read full disclosure
The Digital Asset Market Clarity Act missed the July 4 signing deadline that White House crypto adviser Patrick Witt had floated in May, and the bill is now operating on a hard four-week runway before the Senate breaks for summer recess on August 7.
The bill is not dead, but the calendar math is unforgiving, and the ethics standoff that has blocked Democratic votes remains unresolved.
The CLARITY Act has traveled further than any previous crypto market structure effort. The House passed it in July 2025 by 294 to 134.
The Senate Banking Committee advanced the bill on May 14 by 15 to 9, and it was placed on the Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders on June 1, technically eligible for floor action. What it is not eligible for is skipping the 60-vote cloture threshold, and Republicans cannot reach 60 alone.
The latest update is that the original target of getting the CLARITY Act signed by July 4 has now been missed, pushing the bill into a much tighter legislative window. While much of the Senate-side coordination can still move forward behind the scenes during the summer recess,… https://t.co/FMoVcO0dXl
Only two Democrats voted for the bill in committee: Ruben Gallego of Arizona and Angela Alsobrooks of Maryland. Getting from two to seven or more Democratic floor votes requires resolving the conflict-of-interest provision, then filing cloture, then burning the better part of a Senate work week on debate and passage, all before August 7.
Advertisement
After that, the fall calendar is dominated by the NDAA and appropriations fights, and midterm campaigning makes bipartisan deal-making structurally harder. The August recess deadline has been visible for months; the bill simply hasn’t closed the gap.
Trump’s $1.4 Billion Disclosure Gives Democrats a Talking Point, Not New Leverage
President Trump’s annual financial disclosure revealed roughly $1.4 billion in crypto-linked income for 2025, spread across memecoin royalties, World Liberty Financial token sales, and other streams, plus disclosed crypto holdings exceeding $100 million.
Senator Elizabeth Warren, the ranking Democrat on Banking, responded that any bill reaching the floor must stop officials and their families from “profiting off the crypto industry.” Gallego said he would do “everything I can” to crack down on what he called corrupt dealings, a reminder that his committee vote was never a floor guarantee.
Advertisement
The disclosure doesn’t change the underlying negotiation. Democrats already wanted the ethics language before the number was public; the number gives them a sharper headline, not additional deal leverage.
Photo: Donald Trump
The White House position, as Witt has framed it, is acceptance of rules applying “across the board” but rejection of anything singling out one officeholder. That standoff predates the disclosure and will have to be resolved on the same terms regardless. Concerns about crypto profits by administration officials have drawn scrutiny beyond just this bill; conflicts around senior officials and digital asset holdings have become a recurring theme in Washington.
Compounding the Democratic asks, a recent Supreme Court ruling that the president can fire independent-agency commissioners at will has undercut one Democratic demand in the SEC and CFTC negotiations, a bipartisan commissioner slate. If the president can dismiss those officials freely, the negotiated value of a bipartisan slate erodes before it’s even written into statute.
Ripple said Monday that Luxembourg upgraded its preliminary Crypto-Asset Service Provider (CASP) authorization under the European Union’s (EU) Markets in Crypto-Assets (MiCA) regulations to a full license. The approval clears Ripple to provide cryptoasset services throughout the European Economic Area (EEA).
“This CASP authorisation means Ripple enters the post-transitional MiCA era fully compliant and ready to scale,” said Cassie Craddock, the company’s managing director for Europe and the U.K., in a statement.
The CASP license Ripple announced Monday makes the company one of a small number of digital asset firms to have full authorization under MiCA, which became law three years ago and came into full force on July 1. Crypto firms without a license must stop operating in the region. Ripple was granted a preliminary license in June.
Crypto exchange Binance is among thousands of other CASPs that failed to qualify in time. According to the rules, a firm licensed in an EU country can “passport” its services across the entire area.
Advertisement
In February, Rippled secured full approval as an Electronic Money Institution (EMI) from Luxembourg’s financial regulator, the Commission de Surveillance du Secteur Financier (CSSF), a step that lets the company scale regulated payment services across the European Union.
South Korea’s media and communications review body said it will hear from Polymarket before deciding whether to take corrective action against the prediction market platform.
On Monday, the Broadcasting, Media and Communications Review Committee said it would allow Polymarket to submit its position before making a final decision on a corrective request regarding gambling concerns.
“We decided to provide an opportunity for Polymarket to submit its opinion to thoroughly verify the legality of Polymarket and the way the service is operated,” the committee said, according to a machine translation of the press release.
South Korea’s National Gambling Control Commission Act defines “illegal gaming business” to include providing online services that enable speculative gambling and gives regulators authority to monitor and combat such businesses.
Advertisement
The review comes as Polymarket faces access restrictions in several jurisdictions. According to Polymarket, its platform is restricted in 33 countries, including the US, United Kingdom, France, Germany, Brazil, Singapore, Japan and Australia.
South Korea’s scrutiny moves from users to the platform
The review marks a shift in South Korea’s scrutiny of Polymarket from users to the platform itself. It also follows an earlier police probe into local Polymarket users over alleged illegal gambling linked to election-related markets.
On June 5, the Gangwon Provincial Police launched what was reportedly South Korea’s first illegal gambling probe into local Polymarket users. The investigation was requested by the National Police Agency, according to local media reports at the time.
Advertisement
Under South Korea’s Criminal Act, gambling is punishable by a fine of up to 10 million won (about $6,500), while habitual gambling can carry up to three years in prison or a fine of up to 20 million won. Meanwhile, operating a gambling venue for profit is punishable by up to five years in prison or a fine of up to 30 million won.
South Korea’s Criminal Act. Source: Korea Legislation Research Institute
Polymarket says its restrictions are designed to comply with sanctions, local financial rules, gambling and prediction market laws, anti-money laundering requirements and Know Your Customer regulations.
The company also lists certain regions within otherwise accessible countries as restricted, including Alberta, British Columbia, Ontario and Quebec in Canada, as well as Crimea, Donetsk and Luhansk in Ukraine.
XRP price pushed above the $1.14 resistance area after buyers stepped in with heavy volume and bullish prediction. The token climbed from about $1.13 to $1.15 during the session. The strongest burst arrived late on July 5, when trading activity surged well above the daily average. Now comes the real test: whether $1.14 holds as support or slips back into resistance.
That breakout was not driven by technicals alone. Spot XRP ETFs recorded a ninth straight week of net inflows, showing institutional demand remains intact despite shaky market sentiment. At the same time, a wave of short covering added fuel, helping the price accelerate once key resistance finally gave way.
XRP ETFs, Coinglass
Meanwhile, the CLARITY Act still awaits Senate action after missing a vote before the congressional recess. That delays a potential regulatory catalyst, but it does not erase it. Until lawmakers return, traders will likely keep focusing on price action instead of political headlines.
The next few sessions should reveal whether buyers have enough conviction to defend recent gains. If $1.14 stays intact, momentum could carry XRP toward fresh highs. If not, this breakout may end up as another head fake, proving that markets still enjoy testing impatient traders.
XRP is trading around $1.14 after briefly testing the $1.16 area before sellers stepped in. That leaves $1.16 as the first hurdle bulls need to clear. Even so, several technical signals still suggest buyers are trying to regain control after breaking a short-term downtrend.
Meanwhile, resistance stands near $1.18, followed by $1.20 and $1.23. On the downside, support sits at $1.13, then $1.11 and $1.08. So far, the chart looks like it’s asking traders for patience instead of handing out easy wins.
The MVRV picture adds a little caution, as recent readings remain deeply negative, showing many holders are still sitting on unrealized losses. That often encourages selling as price rebounds toward break-even, although it has also marked reversal zones in previous cycles.
If XRP holds above $1.14 and reclaims $1.18 with strong volume, momentum could carry it toward $1.20 and $1.23. Otherwise, the token may spend a few sessions ranging between $1.13 and $1.18. It may not be exciting, but markets sometimes prefer a slow simmer before the next move.
A decisive close below $1.11 on rising volume would weaken the current setup. In that case, attention would likely shift to the $1.08 support zone. Until then, the bullish structure stays alive, even if it keeps making traders earn their optimism.
LiquidChain Eyes Early Positioning as XRP Tests Critical Support
XRP’s breakout narrative is real, but context matters. Even a move to $1.25 represents single-digit percentage upside from current levels. It’s meaningful for a swing trade, limited for a portfolio-shifting return.
Traders looking for asymmetric exposure during this institutional momentum phase are increasingly scanning early-stage infrastructure plays where price discovery hasn’t happened yet.
LiquidChain ($LIQUID) is a Layer 3 infrastructure project positioning as the cross-chain liquidity layer for the next build cycle. The core proposition: fusing Bitcoin, Ethereum, and Solana liquidity into a single execution environment, so developers deploy once and access all three ecosystems without bridge exposure or fragmented liquidity pools.
The presale is currently priced at $0.01477, with $888K raised to date across a Unified Liquidity Layer and Single-Step Execution architecture that addresses one of the most persistent UX problems in multi-chain DeFi.
LiquidChain presale is worth researching before the current raise phase closes.
In 2024, the world was fascinated by conversational AI. Millions of people spent hours asking chatbots to write emails, summarize reports, generate code, or create artwork. AI was viewed primarily as a digital assistant—powerful, but ultimately waiting for human instructions before taking action.
By 2026, that relationship will have fundamentally changed.
We are no longer simply talking to AI.
We are hiring it.
Advertisement
Across decentralized finance (DeFi), autonomous AI agents are becoming active participants in the global financial system. These digital workers don’t sleep, don’t take vacations, and don’t wait for human approval before performing routine tasks. Equipped with their own Web3 wallets, they can execute trades, rebalance investment portfolios, provide liquidity, monitor market conditions, participate in governance, and negotiate with other AI agents—all without constant human supervision.
This represents one of the biggest paradigm shifts since the invention of blockchain itself.
The next generation of blockchain users won’t primarily be humans typing on keyboards. Instead, they’ll be intelligent software agents operating around the clock, making thousands of financial decisions every second.
While this future promises extraordinary efficiency, it also introduces a critical challenge that existing financial regulations were never designed to solve.
Advertisement
The Identity Crisis of Autonomous Finance
Traditional finance depends heavily on identity verification.
Financial institutions perform Know Your Customer (KYC) checks before allowing users to move capital.
Advertisement
The purpose is simple: every financial action must ultimately be linked to a legally accountable human being.
KYC has served this role for decades because financial systems assumed one basic truth:
Every account belongs to a person.
Autonomous AI changes that assumption completely.
Advertisement
An AI trading agent has no passport.
It has no face.
It has no nationality.
It cannot sign legal documents.
It cannot appear in court.
It exists only as software running across a decentralized infrastructure.
Yet these agents are increasingly capable of controlling significant amounts of digital assets.
Imagine an AI managing a $50 million treasury across multiple blockchains. It continuously searches for yield opportunities, shifts liquidity between protocols, executes arbitrage strategies, and votes in decentralized governance.
If that AI accidentally exploits a vulnerability—or is manipulated into laundering illicit funds—who bears responsibility?
The blockchain only sees a wallet address.
Advertisement
Regulators see an unidentified financial actor.
Current compliance frameworks simply don’t have an answer.
Why KYC Isn’t Enough Anymore
KYC was built for people.
It was never designed to verify autonomous software acting independently.
Advertisement
Even if the developer behind an AI passes KYC, several unanswered questions remain:
Which AI model is operating?
Has the code been modified?
Who owns the agent today?
What permissions does it possess?
What financial actions is it authorized to perform?
Can it be audited after making thousands of autonomous decisions?
These questions concern behavior—not merely identity.
In autonomous finance, trust extends beyond knowing who created an agent.
We must also understand how that agent behaves.
Enter KYA: Know Your Agent
To address this emerging challenge, the crypto industry is developing a new compliance framework:
Advertisement
Know Your Agent (KYA).
Rather than identifying only humans, KYA focuses on verifying autonomous digital entities while maintaining a clear connection to legal accountability.
Think of KYA as creating a digital identity passport for AI agents.
A verified AI agent could include:
Advertisement
Cryptographically signed software identity
Verified developer credentials
Transparent ownership records
Permissioned operational limits
Audit trails of autonomous decisions
Reputation scores based on historical behavior
Continuous security monitoring
Regulatory compliance metadata
Instead of asking, “Who owns this wallet?”
KYA asks a more sophisticated question:
“Can this autonomous agent be trusted to operate safely within financial markets?”
One of KYA’s most important functions is preserving accountability.
AI may make decisions independently, but legal responsibility cannot disappear.
Advertisement
Every autonomous financial agent ultimately needs a chain of accountability that links:
This creates a verifiable relationship between machine execution and human responsibility.
If an AI behaves maliciously, investigators can identify:
Advertisement
Who deployed it
Who authorized it
What software version was running
Whether its permissions exceeded approved limits
Whether its behavior deviated from its intended purpose
Without these connections, financial systems risk becoming impossible to regulate.
Why This Matters for DeFi
Decentralized finance was originally built for permissionless human participation.
Soon, however, AI agents may outnumber human users.
Imagine thousands of autonomous liquidity managers competing across protocols.
AI market makers are continuously adjusting prices.
Advertisement
DAO treasuries are governed by intelligent agents.
Cross-chain arbitrage bots negotiate directly with one another.
Tokenized investment funds managed entirely by AI.
This machine-driven economy could dramatically increase efficiency while reducing operational costs.
Advertisement
But it also raises new risks:
Coordinated AI market manipulation
Autonomous flash loan attacks
AI-generated phishing operations
Self-replicating malicious agents
Untraceable financial fraud
AI collusion across multiple blockchains
Traditional compliance cannot adequately monitor this environment.
KYA provides the trust layer necessary for autonomous finance to scale responsibly.
Building Trust Without Sacrificing Decentralization
Critics often worry that stronger compliance means sacrificing decentralization.
KYA offers a more balanced approach.
Advertisement
Instead of requiring every protocol to become a centralized gatekeeper, decentralized identity technologies can enable agents to prove trustworthiness cryptographically.
This may involve:
Decentralized identifiers (DIDs)
Verifiable credentials
Zero-knowledge proofs
Onchain reputation systems
Smart contract attestations
Cryptographic software signatures
In this model, AI agents can demonstrate compliance without revealing unnecessary private information.
Trust becomes programmable rather than bureaucratic.
The Road Ahead
The rise of autonomous AI is transforming blockchain from a network of human users into an economy of intelligent machines.
Advertisement
This evolution demands more than faster blockchains or smarter algorithms.
It requires an entirely new model of digital trust.
KYC helped establish accountability in the age of human-driven finance.
KYA will help establish accountability in the age of machine-driven finance.
Advertisement
The transition won’t happen overnight. Standards must be developed, regulations modernized, and technical infrastructure built to support verified autonomous agents. But the direction is becoming increasingly clear.
The future of Web3 won’t simply be decentralized.
It will be autonomous.
And in a world where AI agents execute transactions worth millions of dollars every minute, trust can no longer stop at verifying people—it must also verify the intelligent systems acting on their behalf.
Advertisement
Conclusion
The conversation around artificial intelligence has evolved from interaction to delegation. As AI agents become active participants in decentralized finance, identity verification must evolve as well. Know Your Agent (KYA) represents more than a compliance upgrade; it is the foundation for a secure, transparent, and accountable machine economy.
The next chapter of blockchain won’t be defined solely by smart contracts or decentralized applications—it will be shaped by autonomous agents making real-time financial decisions on behalf of individuals, institutions, and entire ecosystems. Ensuring these agents are verifiable, auditable, and accountable will determine whether the AI-powered Web3 economy becomes a trusted financial revolution or an unregulated frontier.
The age of chatting with AI has ended. The age of trusting AI has begun.
A dormant Bitcoin address transferred 30 BTC worth about $1.88 million for the first time in almost 15 years.
Bitcoin address “1KV47” made its first outgoing transfer on Saturday since receiving 30 BTC in August 2011, blockchain data shared by Galaxy Research shows.
The address is among 39,069 listed in a New York lawsuit filed by “Noah Doe” and two Wyoming-based companies seeking ownership of dormant Bitcoin holdings. The case could test how inactive cryptocurrency holdings are treated under the state’s lost-property law.
The listed addresses include those widely associated with Bitcoin creator Satoshi Nakamoto and collectively hold an estimated 3.7 million BTC worth about $234 billion, according to Sani, founder of analytics platform Timechain Index.
Advertisement
More dormant Bitcoin addresses tied to the New York lawsuit have been waking up, with 31 of them moving 17,527 BTC in June, up from five that transferred 4,834 BTC in February, according to Galaxy Digital head of research Alex Thorn.
Can dormant Bitcoin holdings be considered “lost” property?
On Friday, a defendant, identifying themselves as “John Doe 33,” who claims to control one of the dormant Bitcoin addresses, filed a motion to dismiss the lawsuit, arguing that Bitcoin addresses are merely data strings that cannot be sued.
Advertisement
A New York court can adjudicate rights in intangible property, but it does not have the authority to convert public addresses into “found” property just because the plaintiff copied these addresses to a hard drive, Edwin Mata, lawyer and CEO of tokenization platform Brickken, told Cointelegraph.
He added:
The core flaw is that inactivity is not abandonment. Under property law, abandonment generally requires intent to relinquish rights, and a dormant Bitcoin address proves none of that.”
The Bitcoin addresses named in the lawsuit may also represent Bitcoin held in long-term cold storage, coins with lost keys, or simply a holder who refuses to move them. Without private keys needed to control the assets, the foundation of the lawsuit remains “very weak,” Mata said.
The supply of Bitcoin has been dormant for the past five and 10 years. Source: Bitbo
NZD/CHF remains locked in a tight range as traders await the next monetary policy catalyst.
The Reserve Bank of New Zealand heads into Wednesday’s meeting on shaky ground. After May’s 3-3 split was resolved by a casting vote, the committee still lifted its rate path sharply, eyeing a 3.28% terminal rate by 2029. But the oil slide following the US-Iran truce has cut hike odds from over 80% to around 66-70%, splitting major banks between a hold and a further move.
Meanwhile, the Swiss National Bank holds firm at 0% for a fourth straight meeting. Switzerland’s challenge mirrors New Zealand’s in reverse: subdued inflation rather than overheating, leaving little room—or need—for tightening. The franc’s strength stems more from so-called safe-haven flows than rate differentials.
The result: NZDCHF caught between short-term RBNZ uncertainty and near-static Swiss policy, with direction hinging on Wednesday’s decision.
Advertisement
Technical Analysis of NZD/CHF
NZD/CHF remains locked in a broader consolidation on higher timeframes, trapped between resistance at 0.4660-0.4690 and support at 0.4540-0.4560. Price is now compressing into a tighter triangle just below the 100-period EMA, which continues to cap upside as dynamic resistance.
Bullish Scenario
Fundamentally, a hawkish RBNZ surprise on Wednesday—hiking despite the oil-driven pullback in tightening expectations—would give the kiwi a strong tailwind. Technically, buyers first need to break the descending trendline capping price since late May, already rejected on several attempts. Once cleared, the decisive test becomes the 0.4660-0.4690 resistance zone. A genuine breakout would likely require both a strong NZD fundamental catalyst and confirming technical momentum.
Bearish Scenario
Conversely, a dovish hold—as several major banks now expect—could reignite downside pressure. Technically, sellers first need to break the ascending trendline price has leaned on in recent sessions, then push through the more significant 0.4540-0.4560 support. Notably, the 100-period EMA continues to act as reliable dynamic resistance, keeping price capped beneath it and reinforcing the bearish structure until proven otherwise.
Advertisement
Two central banks, two opposite stories: RBNZ still weighing when to tighten, SNB content to sit still. Wednesday’s decision could finally break this narrowing range — will the kiwi’s rate case win out, or does the franc’s quiet resilience hold firm?
Trade over 50 forex markets 24 hours a day with FXOpen. Take advantage of low commissions, deep liquidity, and spreads from 0.0 pips (additional fees may apply). Open your FXOpen account now or learn more about trading forex with FXOpen.
This article represents the opinion of the Companies operating under the FXOpen brand only. It is not to be construed as an offer, solicitation, or recommendation with respect to products and services provided by the Companies operating under the FXOpen brand, nor is it to be considered financial advice.
Bitcoin News: Dave Portnoy, founder of Barstool Sports, disclosed on Fox Business that he is sitting on millions in losses after buying Bitcoin near $100,000, and announced he will hold the position all the way to zero rather than sell again.
The declaration, made on Stuart Varney’s Varney & Co., crystallizes a behavioral pattern that has cost Portnoy heavily across multiple market cycles: buying near local highs, selling before rallies, and re-entering at higher prices.
DAVE PORTNOY: "I'M HOLDING BITCOIN TO ZERO" Barstool Sports founder Dave Portnoy says he is holding his Bitcoin no matter what. “I’ll hold this thing down to zero,” Portnoy told Fox Business. “I know if I sell it, it’s going to go nuclear again. I’d rather go down with the… pic.twitter.com/arGvhitqHT
BTC price peaked above $126,000 in October 2025 before halving to its current level around $62,870, according to CoinDesk data. Portnoy’s latest entry near the $100,000 level puts his unrealized loss at roughly 37% from cost basis, with the peak-to-trough drawdown from his buy point exceeding $60,000 per coin.
Portnoy did not soften the assessment when speaking to Fox Business host Stuart Varney. “Yeah, I got regrets. I bought the thing for $100,000. There’s nothing I’ve been wrong about more than Bitcoin. Every time I sell it, it goes nuclear. Every time I buy it, it tanks,” he said.
The self-diagnosis is unusually blunt for a public figure with a position still on the books.
Advertisement
“I’m holding. I’ll hold this thing down to zero. I know if I sell it, it’s going to go nuclear again. I’d rather go down with the ship this time.”
Photo: Dave Portnoy
The logic is behavioral rather than analytical: Portnoy is not making a valuation case for Bitcoin; he is reacting to a personal track record of selling before every major rally. His commitment to hold to zero is, in effect, a forced discipline imposed by demonstrated inability to time exits correctly.
Portnoy’s history with Bitcoin reads as a case study in retail FOMO compounding. He first entered in late 2020 with approximately $2 million at around $11,000, then sold almost immediately, a position that would have returned roughly 6x had he held through BTC’s early 2021 run to $60,000.
He subsequently rebuilt exposure at higher prices, with his peak Bitcoin position reportedly reaching around $15 million before market declines cut that substantially.
Advertisement
The latest cycle repeated the same dynamic at a higher dollar magnitude. Portnoy has publicly stated he exhausted most of his available cash, averaging down through the drawdown, and his BTC losses now run into the millions on an unrealized basis. His exact BTC holdings remain undisclosed.
Bitcoin (BTC)
24h7d30d1yAll time
The pattern, buy high, capitulate, re-enter higher, is precisely what distinguishes retail investors who underperform a simple buy-and-hold strategy across cycles.
Market timing failure at Portnoy’s scale illustrates the structural disadvantage most active traders face. Research consistently shows that retail investors who attempt to time entries and exits in volatile assets like Bitcoin generate returns well below passive holders over equivalent periods. The risks that accompany prominent Bitcoin holders who buy in size and then face sustained drawdowns are not unique to Portnoy, but his public commentary makes the behavioral traps unusually visible.
Bitcoin touched $63,882 overnight before retreating to around $62,900, per CoinDesk data. The 24-hour high of $63,900 held briefly before sellers pushed it back down.
Thursday’s U.S. jobs report came in weaker than expected, giving liquidity-sensitive assets a lift heading into the weekend.
A weakening jobs market makes a Fed hike less likely and gradually shifts the backdrop that pushed ETF investors out of bitcoin through June. That process takes time, and one print does not flip the setup. The July 14 CPI release is the next data point that could either extend the relief or further cap an early-July rally.
Summer Finance has become the latest decentralized finance protocol to suffer a major security incident. So far, $6 million has been drained in the ongoing exploit, according to blockchain security firm Blockaid.
However, the project has yet to release an official statement.
Flash Loan Attack
Pseudonymous crypto trader Crypto Jargon said the attacker borrowed the funds through a flash loan, manipulated liquidity across Curve’s DAI/USDC pools and Morpho, extracted about $6 million in profit, and repaid the loan within the same transaction. The trader said that flash loan attacks remain difficult to prevent and explained,
“The attacker doesn’t need to own the money they’re manipulating with; they borrow $65M for a few seconds, temporarily distort a price or liquidity ratio, extract the difference, and return the loan before the transaction even finalizes. If any single step reverts, the whole thing undoes itself, so they only ever risk gas fees.”
Phylax Systems founder Odysseas Lamtzidis also shared a technical analysis, suggesting that the exploit was caused by flaws in Summer Finance’s same-transaction vault accounting and liquidity assumptions, rather than compromised keys or abuse of admin privileges. He added that the attacker used an unverified contract to orchestrate the exploit, while the vulnerable protocol components themselves were verified.
Advertisement
2026 DeFi Losses
The incident comes amid a sharp rise in attacks targeting DeFi protocols this year. According to crypto market tracker CryptoRank, the sector has recorded 121 DeFi hacks in 2026, which resulted in almost $942 million in losses.
Most of this year’s attacks happened in the second quarter, when hackers carried out 85 exploits and stole around $775 million. CryptoRank found that DeFi’s total value locked (TVL) has declined every month this year after falling from about $115 billion in January to $70 billion by late June as investor confidence weakened.
While Q2 recorded the highest number of exploits, the firm said most losses stemmed from two major attacks in April. Drift Protocol and KelpDAO together lost about $590 million, which represented more than half of all DeFi losses this year.
TRM Labs and Chainalysis linked both attacks to North Korea-backed hacking groups. Their investigations found that the attackers used social engineering, compromised infrastructure, and manipulated cross-chain verification systems to carry out the large-scale thefts.
⟁https://t.co/vqvBcdSQYC pic.twitter.com/7Rwd3fVOGc
DAVE PORTNOY: "I'M HOLDING BITCOIN TO ZERO"
Fashion3 days ago
Politics3 days ago
Crypto World6 days ago
News Videos6 days ago
Tech6 days ago
Business6 days ago
Sports5 days ago
Crypto World4 days ago
NewsBeat5 days ago
Crypto World4 days ago
Crypto World20 hours ago
Crypto World3 days ago
Tech23 hours ago
Business4 days ago
Business3 days ago
Crypto World4 days ago
You must be logged in to post a comment Login