Connect with us
DAPA Banner
DAPA Coin
DAPA
COIN PAYMENT ASSET
PRIVACY · BLOCKDAG · HOMOMORPHIC ENCRYPTION · RUST
ElGamal Encrypted MINE DAPA
🚫 GENESIS SOLD OUT
DAPAPAY COMING

Politics

Australian Prime Minister Apologises For Kylie Minogue Comment

Published

on

Australian Prime Minister Apologises For Kylie Minogue Comment

The prime minister of Australia has apologised for comments he recently made about one of the country’s most famous residents, Kylie Minogue, on a podcast.

Last week, Anthony Albanese was interviewed by comedian Nikki Osborne on the podcast Bush Deep, where the host asked if he would “shag, marry or date” the famous Australian entertainers Kylie Minogue, Nicole Kidman or Rhonda Burchmore.

Initially, Albanese tried to swerve the question, but eventually said “oh, Kylie, clearly” as a response to “all of the above”.

“She’s terrific,” he then enthused.

Advertisement

His responses were met with immediate backlash, with senator Sarah Henderson describing them as “disrespectful to women, embarrassing to Australians and demean the office of prime minister”.

Australian MP Zali Steggall also said the comments were “entirely inappropriate”, saying that Albanese “needs to learn to push back” and should have led “by example” and “call[ed the question] out as sexist”.

Responding to the controversy in a statement on Monday, Albanese said (as reported by BBC News): “I apologise unequivocally for the comments.”

Albanese is presently out of the country on an official visit, with Richard Marles acting as prime minister in his absence.

Advertisement

Speaking to Australia’s ABC Radio National about the media furore surrounding Albanese’s remarks, Marles said: “From time to time, we obviously do different interviews to the one we are doing now. But I think the other point to make here is that the government that the PM leads is the first in history that has had equality in terms of the number of men and women in cabinet.”

HuffPost UK has contacted Kylie Minogue’s representatives for additional comment.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

Politics

How Does Sleep Help Our Muscles And Brains?

Published

on

How Does Sleep Help Our Muscles And Brains?

Most of us already know that getting enough sleep on the reg can reduce heart attack risk, make you more likely to exercise, and even help you live longer.

But working out exactly why that might be can prove difficult. In recent years, scientists have been looking more closely at the biological mechanisms behind sleep’s benefits.

And recently, a new paper published in the journal Cell identified a deep sleep circuit that might play a role in building muscle and improving our brain function.

The researchers discovered a feedback system that keeps certain hormones in check during sleep, too.

Advertisement

We now know more about how growth hormone is released during sleep

We’ve known for a long time that growth hormone, which is linked to stronger cartilage, muscle, and bone and an improved metabolism alongside a potentially lower heart disease and diabetes risk, is produced during sleep.

But we weren’t really sure how it was released.

In this paper, researchers looked at the brains of mice. They found that growth hormone-releasing hormone (GRGH) and somatostatin, which can suppress the hormone, both rise during rapid eye movement (REM) sleep. That leads to a greater overall release of growth hormone.

Advertisement

During other parts of sleep, though, somatostatin dips while GRGH only rises a little.

Additionally, the scientists found a feedback mechanism in a part of the brain called the locus coeruleus, part of the brain associated with attention, sleep-wake cycles, and thinking.

When growth hormone slowly builds up during sleep, it begins to wake us up bu stimulating this brain region, the study found. But when a more sudden influx of the hormone comes, it seems to make us sleepier.

“This suggests that sleep and growth hormone form a tightly balanced system: Too little sleep reduces growth hormone release, and too much growth hormone can in turn push the brain toward wakefulness,” study co-author Dr Daniel Silverman said.

Advertisement

“Sleep drives growth hormone release, and growth hormone feeds back to regulate wakefulness, and this balance is essential for growth, repair and metabolic health.”

The hormone’s interaction with our locus coeruleus, which keeps us attentive and alert, might also explain sleep’s cognitive benefits, he added.

“Growth hormone not only helps you build your muscle and bones and reduce your fat tissue, but may also have cognitive benefits, promoting your overall arousal level when you wake up.”

Understanding this circuit could help us with treatments in the future

Advertisement

Researchers hope these findings can inform future therapies.

“Understanding the neural circuit for growth hormone release could eventually point toward new hormonal therapies to improve sleep quality or restore normal growth hormone balance,” Dr Silverman stated.

“There are some experimental gene therapies where you target a specific cell type. This circuit could be a novel handle to try to dial back the excitability of the locus coeruleus, which hasn’t been talked about before.”

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Up next for the DSA? Two major swing states.

Published

on

Abdul El-Sayed, Democratic candidate for Michigan Senate, speaks at an event on May 3 in Detroit, Michigan.

It’s hot outside. But the DSA is hotter.

Fresh off major primary wins in Colorado and New York, the Democratic Socialists of America is looking to prove that it can translate its momentum beyond deep-blue House primaries and into competitive statewide races.

DSA officials and allies told POLITICO they’ve already shifted organizers, volunteers and resources toward battleground Michigan and Wisconsin, where progressive Abdul El-Sayed is locked in a three-way Democratic primary for Michigan Senate and DSA-backed Francesca Hong is gaining steam in her primary for Wisconsin governor.

Both El-Sayed and Hong are planning a series of major rallies ahead of their primaries, and their campaigns and DSA organizers are currently discussing bringing many of the movement’s biggest stars — including recent winners from New York and Colorado — to generate attention and shore up the broader national effort. That will likely include a trip to Michigan for Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, who just made a major endorsement for El-Sayed.

Advertisement

“It’s DSA summer. We can’t stop racking up wins,” said Emma Vigeland, co-host of the long-running progressive program The Majority Report, who has campaigned for DSA candidates this primary season. “We’re seeing the culmination of 10 years of democratic socialism becoming more mainstream.”

Sustaining that summer momentum will be a tall task, as the DSA and the insurgent left try to harness the infrastructure they need to extend their wins into the battlegrounds.

But popular Twitch streamer Hasan Piker and Rep. Rashida Tlaib (D-Mich.) are already planning to hit the trail to boost DSA picks in Michigan and Wisconsin ahead of the August primary.

And DSA membership has surged, according to national co-chair Megan Romer, with more than 7,500 new members signing up nationally since the sweeping victories in the Big Apple.

Advertisement

The DSA held a national members call Thursday night to rally the troops featuring two of the organization’s newest stars: Pennsylvania congressional nominee state Rep. Chris Rabb and Melat Kiros, who this week scored a major primary upset in Colorado over longtime Rep. Diana DeGette. Members also addressed Speaker Mike Johnson’s recent attacks on the group.

“This is a movement moment,” Hong said in an interview, pushing back on skeptics who question whether democratic socialists can win statewide in a state President Donald Trump carried twice. “More and more folks are recognizing that the system is rigged and they deserve a more democratic economy, where the power and control are with the workers and not the establishment, the elites and the mega corporations.”

Abdul El-Sayed, Democratic candidate for Michigan Senate, speaks at an event on May 3 in Detroit, Michigan.

The democratic socialist surge has been building since Sen. Bernie Sanders’ 2016 presidential campaign brought the movement into the mainstream. But it’s been supercharged by progressive voters’ frustration with Democratic leadership, especially following former President Joe Biden’s late exit during the 2024 race and the party’s tepid response — in the eyes of many in the base — to the second Trump administration.

That anti-Washington sentiment has now resulted in DSA’s most successful primary season yet, putting democratic socialists on pace to have at least eight aligned members of Congress next year, not to mention the mayorships of New York City, Washington and Seattle — with more races still ahead.

Advertisement

But it hasn’t all been smooth sailing. In California, DSA-backed Sean Dougherty lost his blanket primary against Rep. Jimmy Panetta, while Chris Bennett fell short against Rep. Kevin Kiley, losses that point to a bigger question ahead: How far can the movement translate its surge of national attention and energy? Especially as establishment Democrats and outside groups look to blunt its momentum — and as Republicans ramp up efforts to turn the group into a campaign boogeyman.

“One of the biggest challenges of organizing is helping people channel their organic excitement — positive or negative — into movement growth,” Romer said. “We’ve built these structures and now we get to help people find their way into them so they can use them to win what they want.”

In Wisconsin, Hong is mounting one of the group’s clearest tests yet of whether a democratic socialist can win statewide, running on affordability and opposition to data center expansion — a message that has boosted her into a leading position in some polling heading into next month’s contest.

Public polling in the Wisconsin governor’s race has been sparse. A Marquette University Law School poll from March showed Hong leading the Democratic field at 14 percent among voters who named a candidate, ahead of Mandela Barnes at 11 percent, with 65 percent still undecided.

Advertisement

Hong, who last week appeared on Piker’s stream and raised over $50,000 from viewers in under an hour, says she plans to try unconventional ways of meeting voters heading into the primary.

“We will continue to be campaigning in creative ways, where people are meeting a candidate where they weren’t expected to meet a gubernatorial candidate — bike rides and dive bars,” she said.

Nearby Michigan is shaping up to be perhaps the most important state on the primary calendar this August for the strength of the insurgent movement in the Democratic Party. El-Sayed is not explicitly backed by DSA, but he’s widely viewed within the movement as part of the same progressive project, and organizers are going all in behind El-Sayed’s Senate campaign.

Ocasio-Cortez, who endorsed El-Sayed during his 2018 gubernatorial bid, joins Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.), who previously backed him in this campaign, in lining up two of the most influential voices on the left behind him.

Advertisement

“Everybody in the coalition is on the same page, whether it be Justice Dems, whether it be [Working Families Party], whether it be DSA,” said Vincent Vertuccio, Egret Strategies, a consulting firm that has worked with leftists running for office this cycle. He said Michigan is “absolutely the next focus of this national movement.”

Piker, who has become a highly sought-after surrogate for insurgent candidates this primary season, told POLITICO that he was headed to Michigan soon to rally support: “Abdul El-Sayed is not DSA affiliated, but he’s a progressive fighter. He’s a Berniecrat, and I’m excited to help him out to the best of my ability.”

Hasan Piker, center, takes a photo with attendees of Colorado democratic socialist Melat Kiros' primary election night watch party Tuesday, June 30, in Denver.

A recent Quantus Insights poll from late June found El-Sayed leading Rep. Haley Stevens 41 percent to 36 percent, with state Sen. Mallory McMorrow trailing at 8 percent.

The DSA has another target in Michigan: Ousting incumbent Rep. Shri Thanedar, a former democratic socialist member whom the organization says it expelled over what it described as a “substantial disagreement with the values of DSA.” Thanedar at the time claimed he had renounced his membership, citing the organization’s promotion of a pro-Palestinian rally in New York City in the days immediately after Hamas’ attack on Israel in October 2023.

Advertisement

The representative now faces a DSA-backed challenger in state Rep. Donavan McKinney in Michigan’s 13th District.

Tlaib, an original member of the Squad, is working hard in her backyard to boost both McKinney and El-Sayed. In an interview, she said that the current momentum behind insurgent candidates reminds her of the 2018 wave that first brought her into Congress along with other Squad members, and their frustration once Democrats won unified control in the 2020 elections.

“Democrats had the trifecta and we couldn’t even get the Voting Rights Act passed. We couldn’t even get Build Back Better passed that was about child care and housing,” she said. “These are not years that we can get back for our residents, and especially our children.”

McKinney has hit Thanedar over taking corporate PAC money and questioned his progressive credentials. Tlaib and DSA are banking on their organizing efforts to propel the challenger to victory.

Advertisement

“[Mckinney] was raised in Wayne County all his life. He understands what it feels like to smell like rotten eggs when you go outside because the air is so polluted,” Tlaib added. “People are hungry for folks that will move with urgency.”

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

How Long Is The Odyssey? Christopher Nolan Film’s Runtime Confirmed

Published

on

Anne Hathaway and Tom Holland in The Odyssey

As soon as it was revealed that Christopher Nolan would be following up his Oscar-winning historical biopic Oppenheimer with a new adaptation of the classic tome, The Odyssey, it was pretty obvious that we were in for another bum-numbing epic from the British director.

Nolan is already known for not shying away from a long runtime with his big-screen offerings, with some of his biggest films clocking in at long after the two-hour mark.

Inception, for example, lasts a total of 148 minutes, with Tenet beating that by two minutes.

Another of his most popular movies, Interstellar, lasts just shy of three hours at 169 minutes, while his latest film, Oppenheimer, ran for three hours exactly.

Advertisement

So, how will The Odyssey compare?

How long will Christopher Nolan’s The Odyssey run for?

The good news for anyone worried about whether they’re going to need bathroom and snack breaks when planning their cinema trip for The Odyssey is that the film isn’t quite as long as Oppenheimer.

However, it has to be said that it’s still one of Nolan’s longest movies to date, at 172 minutes in total, as reported by Ireland’s official film classification body, the IFCO.

Advertisement
Anne Hathaway and Tom Holland in The Odyssey
Anne Hathaway and Tom Holland in The Odyssey

What else do we know about The Odyssey so far?

Of course, it’s understandable that The Odyssey would be a long one, considering how much material there is for Nolan to condense into one film.

Based on Homer’s Greek epic, the original story centres around Odysseus and his mammoth journey home to his wife and son in Ithaca at the end of the Trojan war, where along the way he has to face adversaries from mythology like the cyclops and sirens.

Matt Damon will take the lead as Odysseus in the new film adaptation of the tale, sharing the screen with everyone from Anne Hathaway, Robert Pattinson and Tom Holland to Zendaya, Lupita Nyong’o and Charlize Theron.

The Odyssey is due to hit cinemas on Friday 17 July. Check out our more in-depth guide to the new Nolan film here.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Harry Styles Remembers Liam Payne As He Celebrates One Direction On Stage

Published

on

Liam Payne and Harry Styles at the height of their One Direction fame in 2013

Harry Styles took a moment to pay tribute to his former One Direction bandmates after wrapping up his epic, record-breaking run of shows at Wembley Stadium over the weekend.

On Sunday night, the chart-topping star delivered the 12th and final Wembley Stadium gigon his Together, Together world tour, off the back of his hit album Kiss All The Time. Disco, Occasionally.

During his London shows, Harry has been taking a moment to reflect on the early stages of his career, which was also the case during Sunday night’s concert.

“I wouldn’t be on this stage if it wasn’t for four friends of mine that were a massive part of this journey,” he told the crowd, before publicly thanking Niall Horan, Louis Tomlinson, Zayn Malik and his “dear friend”, the late Liam Payne “for these nights and everything that I learned in this time, the friendship, everything”.

Advertisement

“None of this would be possible, I wouldn’t be here without you, thank you so much,” he added.

Liam died in October 2024 at the age of 31, after falling from the balcony of a hotel where he was staying in Argentina, while under the influence of numerous substances.

In the days that followed, the four remaining members of One Direction issued a joint statement, which read: “The memories we shared with [Liam] will be treasured forever. For now, our thoughts are with his family, his friends, and the fans who loved him alongside us. We will miss him terribly. We love you Liam.”

They then posted more personal tributes on their individual social media accounts, with Harry remembering his “lovely friend” as “warm, supportive and incredibly loving”.

Advertisement

Harry lamented: “The years we spent together will forever remain among the most cherished years of my life. I will miss him always.”

Liam Payne and Harry Styles at the height of their One Direction fame in 2013
Liam Payne and Harry Styles at the height of their One Direction fame in 2013

David Fisher/Shutterstock

More recently, Harry admitted that Liam’s death was something he has “struggled” to address over the last two years.

“There was a period when he passed away where I really struggled with kind of acknowledging how strange it is to have people kind of own part of your grief, in a way,” the Sign Of The Times singer shared.

“I [had] such strong feelings around my friend passing away, and then suddenly, being aware [that] there [was] maybe a desire from other people [for] you to convey that in some way – or it means you’re not feeling what you’re feeling or something.”

Advertisement

The Grammy winner added: “It’s so difficult to lose a friend. It’s difficult to lose any friend, but it’s so difficult to lose a friend who is so like you in so many ways. It’s like, I saw [in Liam] someone with the kindest heart, who just wanted to be great.”

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

The woke warrior heading for Downing Street

Published

on

The woke warrior heading for Downing Street

The news that Andy Burnham has appointed James Purnell as his chief of staff has been greeted with horror by the likes of Owen Jones and Zack Polanski.

This is usually a good sign. Purnell’s past as a Blairite minister, pro-market stance and failure to despise Israel cast doubt, for them, on Burnham’s claim to be radical. Others might see this as a cause for relief. And what’s not to like about a man who once proposed, as Purnell did, lie detector-tests to weed out benefits cheats?

But just because the whiniest elements of the hard left loathe Purnell doesn’t mean his appointment is a good thing. For as smiley and reasonable as he appears, he embodies a problem with the modern left that’s every bit as pernicious as its economic incompetence. This is its obsession with imposing its fringe woke values on the rest of us.

Advertisement

If you want to know what makes Burnham’s new Svengali tick, forget the nearly two years he served as CEO of a global consultancy firm. Instead, look at what he did during his stint as one of the BBC’s top executives between 2013 and 2020, as both director of strategy and director of radio and education, when he championed the worst excesses of the diversity and inclusion agenda.

The climax of this stint was the publication in 2018 of an extraordinary report, ‘LGBT Culture and Progression’. It set out a detailed plan to transform the corporation and to force it to comply with the diktats of the LGBTQ+ lobby. Purnell oversaw the report and wrote the foreword. He applauded its recommendations, which he openly acknowledged were written with ‘support from Stonewall’. What could possibly go wrong?

Advertisement

Enjoying spiked?

Why not make an instant, one-off donation?

We are funded by you. Thank you!

Advertisement




Please wait…

Advertisement
Advertisement

The goal of this madcap project, believe it or not, was to stamp out ‘heteronormativity’ at the BBC. Apparently, it was a problem that the national broadcaster assumed heterosexuality is the default setting of human sexual orientation – even though it is. Where did Purnell imagine the BBC’s viewers came from?

In his foreword, Purnell argued ‘an organisation that appears to have a heteronormative culture’ would fail to attract 18- to 24-year-olds. What he failed to realise was that coming over all kinky and queer wouldn’t attract young people to the BBC either.

Advertisement

The joke is that the average age of a BBC One viewer at the time of Purnell’s report was 61. For BBC Two it was 62. Did he bother to ask viewers in their sixties if they fancied less heteronormativity with their BBC soaps? Did he heck.

In fact, the team behind the report didn’t canvass the opinion of anyone outside the BBC’s own buildings. Its recommendations were based exclusively on staff surveys run by the corporation’s in-house Pride group – which, as the report helpfully explained, represents anyone who is ‘genderqueer, bisexual, gay, lesbian, transgender, nonbinary, pansexual, intersex, asexual, queer, questioning or an ally’. The dinner party from hell, in other words.

With the blessing of Purnell, the demands of this tiny, unrepresentative bunch ricocheted through the BBC’s editorial output. One of the demands, for example, was for LGBT characters to feature more frequently and prominently in shows. If you want to complain about the endless succession of drag queens on your TV screen, Andy Burnham’s new chief of staff is your man.

Advertisement

Another demand was that staff should use preferred pronouns. This was taken by journalists as an instruction to respect the delusions of any crossdresser – even in news reports. Male rapists who claimed to be female would now routinely be referred to as ‘she / her’ by the BBC.

If you thought the age of the left imposing its fringe cultural obsessions on society might be coming to an end, then think again. Burnham’s most important hire is one of the worst kinds of cultural warriors. Let’s just hope James Purnell doesn’t get to do to Britain what he did to the BBC.

Malcolm Clark was LGB Alliance’s head of research from 2019 to 2022. Visit his Substack, The Secret Gender Files, here.

Advertisement

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

Trump Slams UK’s ‘Weak Leaders’ Ahead Of Nato Talks

Published

on

Trump Slams UK's 'Weak Leaders' Ahead Of Nato Talks

Keir Starmer is preparing for a dressing down from Donald Trump at his last Nato summit as prime minister over the government’s underwhelming defence spending plans.

The PM will fly to Ankara in Turkey a week after unveiling the long-delayed Defence Investment Plan (DIP).

Although it contained an extra £15 billion for the armed forces over the next four years, nearly one-third of it is unfunded, while there was no pathway for how the government plans to hit its target of spending 3.5% of national income on defence by 2035.

Starmer insisted that, once security spending is added, Britain will be spending 4.2% of its gross domestic product (GDP) on defence by then.

Advertisement

But that would still fall short of Trump’s demand that all Nato allies increase defence-related spending to 5% of GDP by the middle of the next decade.

It’s therefore no surprise that, judging by his social media posts, the US president may already sharpening his knives as he prepares to meet the outgoing prime minister.

Trump reposted a tweet on his platform, Truth Social, over the weekend which attacked England’s supposed decline.

“Just 100 years ago, England was the greatest empire the world had ever seen,” the post, from an account called Geiger Capital, read.

Advertisement

“A few generations later, they are a deindustrialized welfare zone unable to stop third-world men from invading on rubber boats.

“Decline happens fast. Weak leaders and suicidal empathy.”

The same post also pointed out that Britain is on the cusp of appointing its seventh prime minister in a decade, with Andy Burnham preparing to replace Starmer in two weeks’ time.

Trump’s dig comes after months of turmoil in the UK-US relationship, triggered by Starmer’s refusal to let American troops use British military base to launch attacks on Iran.

Advertisement

Trump has already criticised the incoming PM too, describing Burnham – the former mayor of Greater Manchester – as “the mayor of a town” and “extremely liberal”.

The US ambassador to Nato Matthew Whitaker, has already hinted that the US president will be cracking the whip on his allies at the summit in Turkey this week.

In a thinly-veiled threat, he said: “Some allies are doing more than others.

“Poland, the North countries, the Baltic countries lead the way and Germany is on track for the 5%, reaching it in 2029, but many allies are lagging behind and President Trump expects all allies to step up immediately.

Advertisement

“We expect all allies to demonstrate meaningful upward trajectories both quantitively and qualitatively in defence spending that results in fairer burden sharing.”

Britain was Nato’s third largest defence spender in 2015 after the US and Greece, but last year it slipped down to 12th.

Burnham has vowed to “take my responsibilities fully” to fund the DIP if he gets into office.

Listen to Commons People, the podcast that makes politics easy. Every week, Kevin Schofield and Kate Nicholson unpack the week’s biggest stories to keep you informed. Join us for straightforward analysis of what’s going on at Westminster.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

The House Article | If we cut the parliamentary education service, children will miss out

Published

on

If we cut the parliamentary education service, children will miss out
If we cut the parliamentary education service, children will miss out

Image by: Guy Bell / Alamy


4 min read

Proposed cuts to the parliamentary education and outreach team risk reducing access to Parliament and increasing disengagement with politics

Advertisement

This year marks the 20th anniversary of the UK Parliament Teacher Ambassador Programme, an initiative that gives teachers across the country a chance to experience Parliament beyond a screen or textbook. This knowledge is brought home to inspire pupils, colleagues, and their wider community, and spark interest in our political system.

Yet, against the backdrop of this anniversary, there has been a proposal to cut the UK Parliament education outreach service and move toward more online provision – a move that risks reducing access to parliamentary education for rural and coastal areas like Cornwall.

For constituencies like mine in Truro and Falmouth, this outreach provision is vital. Some schools cannot get to Parliament – and those that can often struggle to secure places. Not long ago, students from King Charles Primary School in Falmouth were in London but were unable to get a slot for a tour of Parliament. I ended up meeting them at Millbank Pizza Express, which was not quite the visit I hoped the pupils from Year 6 would have.

Advertisement

This is not an uncommon experience for my area. If children from Cornwall are rejected for their parliamentary visit, then the six hour journey, minimum two night trip to the capital becomes simply unaffordable. And those children, many of whom will have never been to London, will miss out.

Currently, the South West has a regional outreach officer who plays an important role in connecting people with Parliament. Last year alone, they worked with 20,000 children and 780 adult learners, including Youth Parliament members, SEND learners, English for speakers of other languages (ESOL) learners, young people not in education, employment or training (Neets), and other communities often underrepresented in democratic participation.

For constituencies like mine in Truro and Falmouth, this outreach provision is vital

Advertisement

The team has helped facilitate several non-partisan politics summer schools for MPs across the region, including my own in 2025, and they will support me again this summer. At my last politics summer school, the outreach officer taught 23 young people from Truro and Falmouth about how Parliament works, how laws are made and the traditions and procedures that underpin our democracy. This sort of outreach feels more important than ever as discussions around votes at 16 continue and efforts are made to engage those who might otherwise feel disengaged.

Having worked in schools, I know that online provision doesn’t effectively replace in-person engagement. The outreach team already delivers digital sessions, yet in-person engagement is categorically favoured, with digital uptake accounting for less than five per cent of total delivery. This work requires a unique skill set, and I have seen how much it helps young people to participate in an objective and helpful way – something of great value in a politically divisive time.

Communities closer to Westminster already benefit from greater access to Parliament, so it seems counterproductive to cut regional staff while retaining a small Westminster-based team. Those of us who are more than 200 miles away are not only physically distant but often socially disconnected too. It risks creating more unequal opportunity, something rural communities know all too well. The education team are changing the rules this summer so that schools from remote areas will be able to apply early for visit places and this cannot come soon enough. But if there is also any way of increasing visit capacity I know it would be immediately filled.

Advertisement

This is about protecting democracy and ensuring access and opportunity wherever people live. I am concerned how areas situated far from Parliament will be considered and how the loss of in-person services will affect SEND schools, those with disabilities, and those facing digital exclusion. Parliament belongs to everyone, and everyone should have the opportunity to properly engage with it, whether that’s through a visit to Westminster or outreach in their own community. I understand the limitations of cost – but I would hate to see this diminished.

Jayne Kirkham is Labour MP for Truro and Falmouth

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Meet the gang-rapists and murderers that Britain can’t deport

Published

on

Meet the gang-rapists and murderers that Britain can’t deport

To the surprise of no one, it has been revealed that the UK is unable to deport 50 per cent of illegal migrants due to human-rights claims. A government document leaked to The Times found that, of the 400,000 illegal immigrants identified by the Home Office as living in the UK, more than half could not be deported as they awaited the outcomes of various tribunal decisions.

But it is not just failed refugees we cannot deport. The UK is also unable to deport criminal monsters, even if they have been found guilty of the most heinous crimes.

Last week, we discovered that Shabir Ahmed, the infamous ringleader of a Rochdale rape gang, cannot be deported to Pakistan. Ahmed was convicted in 2012 of 30 child-rape offences, with some of his victims as young as 12. The girls he raped were ‘plied’ with alcohol and drugs, gang-raped in rooms above take-away shops, and sent to other men in taxis to be abused.

Advertisement

Ahmed – who, in a bleak twist of irony, was a ‘welfare officer’ for Oldham Council at the time of his offences – was released on Thursday after serving 14 years of a 19-year sentence. Incredibly, he is protected from deportation by a provision in the 1971 Immigration Act, which exempts Commonwealth citizens who arrived in the UK before 1973 from removal. This sadistic paedophile was stripped of his British citizenship at the time of his conviction, but will nonetheless be free to roam the streets here for as long as he pleases.

Another similarly outrageous case is that of Dwight Merrick. The 45-year-old Jamaican ‘asylum seeker’, also known as ‘Yardy’, who committed a brutal murder in Camden, north London.

On 27 September 2025, Merrick ‘came to blows’ with 44-year-old Shaun Latimer-Kayser, beating him with a plank of wood before fatally stabbing him. It was a crime that Merrick should never have been able to commit. In 2010, he was deported to Jamaica for firearm offences. He then returned to the UK in 2014, claiming that he was an asylum seeker. This surely bogus claim was still being mulled over by the sclerotic British state when he carried out the murder, 11 years later.

Advertisement

This week, Merrick was jailed for life. Shaun’s cousin Sarah Whaley told the Camden New Journal:


Enjoying spiked?

Why not make an instant, one-off donation?

Advertisement

We are funded by you. Thank you!




Advertisement

Please wait…

Advertisement

‘Our family adored him. Shaun had a big family and many siblings who loved him. He did not have the easiest start in life, but he never let that define him. He was a true gentleman – polite, moralistic, loyal and very family-oriented.’

Advertisement

Merrick now begins a life sentence in Britain, many thousands of miles from the island where he was born. What possible reason can someone have for claiming asylum from Jamaica – a country which 230,000 British tourists visit each year? If you were to create a horror story of how asylum has gone wrong in Britain, Merrick’s case would be it.

We currently have no clue why Merrick was still here 15 years after he was initially deported for gun crimes, but we do know that the British public needed protection from him. Yet the state failed to provide this most basic duty.

The Home Office has made no statement on the failure to deport Merrick. But for soon-to-be-released serial rapist Shabir Ahmed, it said:

Advertisement

‘On his release [Ahmed] will be on the sex offender’s register for life, ordered to stay away from his victims and banned from contacting any child or young person. As well as facing strict curfews and restriction zones, his every movement will be tracked, forced to wear an electronic tag. Should he breach his conditions, he will be immediately locked up.’

Needless to say, this is totally inadequate. The financial cost of these failures to deport is eye-watering. Daily monitoring of known violent offenders, 24-hour surveillance tracking their every move, and endless checks that they aren’t roaming or applying for work near children are just some of the expenses.

Then the human cost is unfathomable. Imagine being the victim of this rapist, knowing you could bump into him at any time, or – in the horrendous and completely avoidable case of Shaun Latimer-Kayser – be stabbed to death in the street by a known violent offender who should have been removed from Britain, once and for all, a decade-and-a-half ago

Advertisement

Without a government that actively protects us, Britons are merely left to hope that these men – who seemingly have no morals, have never obeyed the law, and have never respected Britain’s borders since they arrived here – will somehow suddenly obey such whimsical ideas as ‘curfews’ and ‘restriction zones’ in their newly released, free lives. This is delusional.

The cases of Shabir Ahmed and Dwight Merrick must be a wake-up call. Britain’s uncontrolled borders are literally lethal.

Andy Jones is a journalist and broadcaster.

Advertisement

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

Taylor Swift And Travis Kelce’s Wedding: Celebrity Moments You Might Have Missed

Published

on

Madison Square Garden on Friday, after Taylor Swift and Travis Kelce's wedding there

Anyone with even a passing interest in celebrity culture will surely be aware that chart-topping musician Taylor Swift and NFL star Travis Kelce have officially tied the knot.

Over the last few weeks, whispers about the pair’s planned big day turned to very loud rumours about them getting hitched in a lavish 1,000-strong ceremony at New York’s iconic arena Madison Square Garden – which turned out to be very much true.

The worst-kept secret in showbiz was confirmed to be the case on Friday when the screens outside the venue flashed up a message reading “JUST&T MARRIED”, with a similar slogan popping up on the licence plate of a car spotted leaving the venue shortly afterwards.

Madison Square Garden on Friday, after Taylor Swift and Travis Kelce's wedding there
Madison Square Garden on Friday, after Taylor Swift and Travis Kelce’s wedding there

Since then, it’s emerged that the couple went all out for the ceremony, which included the creation of a European-style castle inside the arena, as well as an outside-inside garden theme and wedding looks designed by Jonathan Anderson, the creative director of Dior’s Haute Couture Collections “in close collaboration” with both Taylor and Travis.

Of course, what we all want now is more details, and with the wedding dominating pretty much every entertainment news outlet right now, it may well be hard to keep up with what actually went down at the Swift-Kelce wedding.

Advertisement

Here are some of the biggest celebrity moments you might have missed…

Adam Sandler was the officiant at Taylor Swift and Travis Kelce’s wedding

One detail that Taylor’s spokesperson was happy to confirm once the singer was hitched was the fact that Adam Sandler was the one to do the honours, marrying the Grammy winner and her new husband.

Adam and Travis first crossed paths when the latter made a cameo in the Happy Gilmore sequel last year, while the comedy actor has apparently known Taylor for years through his daughters.

Advertisement
Adam Sandler

He was also a guest on Travis’ New Heights podcast last year, where he told the Kansas City Chiefs star: “When you guys first started dating, my family was like, ‘Yes. Look how good they are together. He’s a gentleman and she’s having so much fun’.”

According to TMZ, Adam was anything but a traditional officiant, delivering a specially-written original song for Taylor and Travis’ big day.

Stevie Knicks and Paul McCartney are also thought to have performed at the wedding reception

Stevie Nicks

When Madison Square Garden emerged as a potential venue for Taylor’s big day, fans pointed out that the last time she made an appearance there, she sported a Stevie Nicks t-shirt, which may have been an Easter egg for the Fleetwood Mac singer performing at the bash.

According to People magazine, Stevie was, indeed, one of the A-list performers at Taylor and Travis’ wedding reception, where Sir Paul McCartney apparently gave a rendition of the Beatles classic I Want To Hold Your Hand.

TMZ also indicated that Haim might have performed at the event, while Page Six claimed that Tim McGraw, one of Taylor’s earliest musical inspirations, was booked to perform.

Advertisement
Sir Paul McCartney

Speaking of music, Taylor Swift apparently walked down the aisle to one of her own songs at her wedding

Music was always going to be one of the talking points at Taylor Swift’s wedding, and since it was suggested in a TMZ report that the You Belong With Me star had walked down the aisle to a Bridgerton-esque orchestral reimagining of one of her own songs, fans have been speculating about which it could have been.

One we can probably rule out is Blank Space, her 2014 hit about her past bad luck when it came to romance, although a line from this song was embossed on handkerchiefs given to guests on their arrivals.

Suffice to say, the wedding guestlist was absolutely enormous

Selena Gomez was, of course, present and correct for her BFF Taylor Swift's wedding
Selena Gomez was, of course, present and correct for her BFF Taylor Swift’s wedding

Days before the wedding, it was reported that the guestlist could reach numbers as high as 1,000, with Taylor even joking that “anyone I’ve ever talked to” would be getting an invite.

Indeed, the list of celebrities in attendance is an especially long one.

Advertisement

Joining the bride and groom’s respective families were some of Taylor’s famous friends, including Selena Gomez, the Haim sisters, Gigi Hadid (who apparently attended with boyfriend Bradley Cooper), Ed Sheeran, Gracie Abrams, Karlie Kloss (and her husband Joshua Kushner), Ice Spice and Lena Dunham.

It seems that Taylor also made good on her promise to invite presenters Greg James and Graham Norton, while Hugh Grant – who previously enjoyed a night of partying with Travis when his now-wife’s Eras Tour landed in London – also put in an appearance.

Reese Witherspoon, Nicole Kidman, Jennifer Lawrence, Tom Cruise were reported to be there, too, as were Lana Del Rey and Sabrina Carpenter, both of whom have appeared on Taylor’s albums Midnights and The Life Of A Showgirl.

Taylor Swift and Sabrina Carpenter
Taylor Swift and Sabrina Carpenter

Taylor Swift seemingly avoided having to choose between her infamous ‘squad’ by not having bridesmaids

Instead, the singer’s representative confirmed that, in lieu of bridesmaids, she had a single “man of honour” in the form of her brother, Austin.

Advertisement

Similarly, Travis didn’t have groomsmen, but his brother Jason Kelce served as best man, while Jason’s daughters were reportedly on flower girl duties.

Travis and Jason Kelce pictured in 2017
Travis and Jason Kelce pictured in 2017

Lena Dunham apparently caused quite the stir with her speech at Taylor Swift and Travis Kelce’s wedding

One of our favourite stories to come out of the wedding so far is that Girls creator Lena Dunham, a long-time friend of Taylor’s, was tasked with performing a speech at the reception.

Per the Daily Mail, true to form, Lena held nothing back with a speech the outlet described as “shockingly rude”, eliciting “gasps” from the crowd, but thankfully plenty of “laughs” too.

Fortunately, it seemed Taylor was a fan, with a supposed “insider” claiming she hailed her friend as a “genius” afterwards.

Advertisement
Lena Dunham

Come on then… who wasn’t at Taylor Swift and Travis Kelce’s wedding?

With a guestlist as big as this one, sometimes the story is who didn’t make the cut.

Among the most notable absentees were Blake Lively and Ryan Reynolds, which at one point would have been unthinkable, but the couple’s relationship with the bride is reported to have turned frosty in recent history.

It should be noted, though, that they were watching their six-year-old daughter competing in a horse show on the day of the wedding, so it could just be that they couldn’t get out of a prior commitment.

While Zoë Kravitz was in attendance, her rumoured fiancé Harry Styles was not.

Advertisement

Harry, of course, once dated Taylor, and is rumoured to be the inspiration for numerous songs on her hit album 1989, including Out Of The Woods and, indeed, Style.

Pop fans will know, however, that Harry was performing his last of 12 record-breaking nights at London’s Wembley Stadium on the night of Taylor’s nuptials, with Variety claiming he was invited to the event, but couldn’t make it due to this previous booking.

The former One Direction star wasn’t the only famous +1 to miss out on the Swift-Kelce wedding, as the Daily Mail claimed that Jack Antonoff’s wife Margaret Qualley was also not in attendance.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Putin Launches Fresh Ukraine Strikes After Talks With Trump

Published

on

Putin Launches Fresh Ukraine Strikes After Talks With Trump

Vladimir Putin snubbed Donald Trump’s latest attempts at ending the war in Ukraine by launching a brutal attack on Kyiv just hours after the two leaders spoke.

The US president spoke to the Russian autocrat over the phone for nearly 90 minutes on Saturday while America was celebrating the 250th anniversary of its independence.

The Kremlin claimed their conversation was “business-like and quite constructive”.

But Russia was back to bombing Ukraine by Sunday night.

Advertisement

At least 11 people were killed overnight and a further 46 others injured as Putin’s missile and drone strikes targeted the capital.

It was the second set of strikes on Kyiv in a week.

Trump’s phone call with Putin came after previous US-brokered peace talks between Ukraine and Russia stalled while the White House was focused on its war in Iran.

The US president has also shifted away from his sympathy for Putin in recent weeks and instead acknowledged that Ukrainian leader Volodymyr Zelenskyy is “holding his own” on the battlefield.

Advertisement

Even so, the Kremlin described Putin and Trump’s conversation as “business-like and quite constructive”.

Russian aide Yuri Ushakov said early on Sunday: “The American president once again confirmed his readiness to work towards a rapid end to the fighting and find solutions to overcome the crisis.”

He said Putin was pushing for a “political-diplomatic resolution of the conflict, with due account of Russia’s fundamental approach”.

Ushakov then accused both Ukraine and its European allies of “counting on extending and even escalating the conflict and on terrorism against civilians”, referring to Ukraine’s long-range missile strikes on Russian targets.

Advertisement

Ukrainian president Volodymyr Zelenskyy also revealed he spoke to Trump over the weekend.

He said they had “very good” discussions about the war, including its 1,200-kilometre front line.

He said: “There is a real prospect to end this war and American resolve will have a crucial meaning.”

Zelenskyy and Trump are set to attend this week’s Nato summit in Ankara, where member states are expected to reaffirm support for Ukraine and offer more financial support.

Advertisement

The US is not expected to contribute to any further funding.

Listen to Commons People, the podcast that makes politics easy. Every week, Kevin Schofield and Kate Nicholson unpack the week’s biggest stories to keep you informed. Join us for straightforward analysis of what’s going on at Westminster.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2025