Connect with us
DAPA Banner

Crypto World

Web3 collapse accelerates as eight games fail this year

Published

on

Web3 collapse accelerates as eight games fail this year

Eight web3 games have either shuttered, paused operations, or pivoted to web2 this year as the space continues to struggle amid a major funding drought.

The latest web3 games to be hit, 77-Bit and Pixel Heroes Adventure, delivered their bad news on Wednesday. 

Pixel Heroes Adventure says it laid off its entire team due to “unavoidable circumstances,” while 77-Bit paused its development, citing infrastructure issues “built with corners we cut trying to win time that couldn’t hold the scale we grew into.”

Before the dust from those two announcements had had time to settle, XOCIETY revealed on Thursday that it would be pausing its live service NFT game and web3 activities due to “ongoing profitability issues.” Its development team, NDUS, is considering selling or merging the firm.  

Advertisement

One of Moku’s social media team members, @EduMock noted that this year, Bloktopia, Pixiland, Forgotten Runiverse, GENSO Online, and KTTY World have all either shut down, paused their operations, or pivoted to web2. 

Web3 games typically involve some sort of element that incorporates blockchain technology, such as NFTs or some kind of token system. 

Earlier this month, Gunzilla Games, the firm behind Off The Grid and one of the biggest names in web3 gaming, was revealed to be struggling to pay its staff on time, with multiple staff members reporting that they hadn’t been paid after months of work. 

The tone deaf response from Off The Grid to criticisms of staff salary delays.

Read more: Hamster Kombat players are exploiting the game with massage guns

Advertisement

The response from the company’s CEO spun the coverage as FUD. He claimed the salary delays were necessary, and framed the revelations as “a new narrative from haters.”

Web3’s woes stretch back further than the beginning of this year. Indeed, crypto poster “@StarPlatinum_” noted that, in May 2025, 18 different web3 studios and games had shuttered their operations across the first five months of the year.

Has web3 gaming funding dried up?

The downturn appears to stem from a lackluster demand in web3 games that has in turn, contributed to a lack of venture capital funding to keep supporting the development of these teams. 

Indeed, various web3 executives told Decrypt that funding was starting to dry up, many web3 games were reaching the end of their life span, and teams were pivoting away from the space entirely.  

Advertisement

The CEO of web3 game The Sandbox, Robby Yung, told Decrypt, “Venture capital funding in gaming has been dry for years,” adding that “most of them probably raised money in 2022, and this is just how long their runway has lasted.”

Even Gunzilla’s web3 director, Theodore Agranat, told Decrypt that there’s an “open” and “universal sentiment” about the lack of funds within his venture capital contacts.

The founder of Wayfinders, another web3 game, said these these web3 teams might be too ambitous.

Read more: Web3 is the future of the internet — and a16z’s exit liquidity

Advertisement

Chris Heatherly, who ran the development studio Great Big Beautiful Tomorrow, which suffered its own game closures, said investors thought crypto firms would make twice their return quicker than a regular fund, “so they wanted these redonkulous returns and had no patience.”

He added, “Towards the end of 2023, mid-2023, crypto funds stopped deploying and writing checks.”

There’s also been economic struggles across the mainstream gaming industry. Fortnite’s developer Epic Games, Ubisoft, and EA have made thousands of their employees redundant. 

Meta, the firm that rebranded its image from Facebook as part of the “metaverse” hype, announced in March that it was shutting down its virtual reality metaverse project, Horizon Worlds, this year.

Advertisement

Got a tip? Send us an email securely via Protos Leaks. For more informed news and investigations, follow us on XBluesky, and Google News, or subscribe to our YouTube channel.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

Crypto World

With No Bipartisan Leadership, CFTC ‘Won’t Slow Down‘ on Rulemaking

Published

on

Government, CFTC, United States, Commodities Investment, Prediction Markets

The chair of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC), Michael Selig, said he would not wait for the appointment of additional commissioners to lead the regulatory agency before moving ahead on rulemaking potentially related to digital assets and prediction markets.

In a Thursday hearing of the House Agriculture Committee, Selig responded to questions from ranking member Angie Craig, who called out the lack of leadership at the CFTC, which normally has a bipartisan panel of five commissioners. The Minnesota representative asked the chair to commit to not finalizing regulations while he is the only commissioner.

“In the interim, we cannot, for the sake of the American people, slow down in our rulemaking,” said Selig. “It’s very important that we get investor protections, consumer protections and safeguards for our markets. And so, I cannot, unfortunately, commit to not do my job that I was appointed to do by the president.”

Government, CFTC, United States, Commodities Investment, Prediction Markets
CFTC Chair Michael Selig speaking on Thursday. Source: US House Committee on Agriculture

Selig, who has served as the CFTC’s sole commissioner and chair since December, has come under scrutiny from many lawmakers for unilaterally leading the agency on rules favoring crypto and prediction markets with no bipartisan group of commissioners. As of Thursday, President Donald Trump had not publicly announced any nominations to staff the agency nor signaled he intended to do so.

“We’re going to do more through rulemaking,” said Selig in response to a question on the CFTC’s leadership from Representative Don Davis. “We can’t have the staff deciding on discretion what the rules are.”

Advertisement

Related: CFTC probes oil futures trades tied to Trump’s moves in Iran: Report

The CFTC chair proposed rulemaking in March that could amend or issue new regulations over event contracts on prediction markets. Selig has been outspoken about claiming that the agency has “exclusive jurisdiction” over prediction markets as the companies behind some platforms face state-level lawsuits related to sports betting laws and proposed legislation to crack down on insider trading.

CFTC’s legal fight over prediction market continues

Gaming authorities in several US states have filed lawsuits against prediction market companies like Kalshi and Polymarket, alleging the platforms offered sports betting in violation of state laws.

Advertisement

New Mexico Representative Gabe Vasquez questioned Selig at Thursday’s hearing with a visual aid showing that bets on event contracts and through state-level gaming “aren’t much of a difference, yet they are regulated completely differently.” He accused the CFTC of using “loopholes” to bypass state laws and requirements for prediction markets, causing some jurisdictions to miss out on revenue.

“The CFTC was not created or intended to regulate sports gambling,” said Vasquez, adding:

“Are we regulating real economic risk, or are we allowing prediction markets to steal billions of dollars in an unregulated free-for-all, with no consumer protection as Congress and the CFTC turns a blind eye?”

Companies like Kalshi have argued that they are under the sole jurisdiction of the CFTC. This argument led the company to court wins in Arizona and New Jersey, where this month judges blocked state officials from taking action against Kalshi.

Magazine: Should users be allowed to bet on war and death in prediction markets?

Advertisement