Connect with us
DAPA Banner

Crypto World

why connectivity will define the next era

Published

on

why connectivity will define the next era

In today’s newsletter, Paul Frost-Smith, CEO of Komainu, covers how institutional crypto is converging with traditional finance, but speed can introduce risk if legal and compliance layers aren’t aligned.

Then, in “Ask an Expert,” Sam Boboev, from the “Fintech Wrap Up,” details the key coordination risks institutions must solve for.


Beyond custody: why connectivity will define the next era.

Institutional crypto markets

Institutional adoption of crypto has matured rapidly. The challenge is no longer simply securing assets, but moving and managing them efficiently across a fragmented ecosystem of custodians, exchanges and counterparties. With assets under professional custody now exceeding $200 billion, the inefficiencies of siloed infrastructure have an increasingly material impact on trading, hedging and liquidity management.

Advertisement

Treasury teams often find assets stranded across multiple platforms, creating operational friction that slows trades, constrains intraday liquidity and increases risk exposure. Idle assets tie up capital, amplify counterparty risk and raise the cost and complexity of managing institutional portfolios. In a 24/7 market where speed, execution and real-time visibility matter, the ability to mobilise capital across platforms is no longer optional, it is a prerequisite for scale, efficiency and resilience.

The next phase of market evolution will be defined by connectivity. Platforms that link custody, liquidity and collateral in real time are no longer “nice to have,” they are critical infrastructure. Networked systems enable assets to move faster, collateral to be rehypothecated safely and positions to be adjusted instantly without the delays inherent in siloed setups. Institutions that can leverage integrated infrastructure gain a direct advantage in capital efficiency, risk management and operational agility.

Technologies such as Bitcoin’s Liquid Network illustrate the potential. By combining security, transparency, and near-instant settlement, these networks provide a model for institutions to operate efficiently while mitigating counterparty and operational risk. Assets that are digital-native and programmable can be pledged, transferred and released automatically according to predefined rules, bringing crypto markets closer to the operational standards expected in traditional finance.

The implications are clear. The efficiency and integration of underlying infrastructure directly affect portfolio outcomes. A digital asset’s value is no longer defined solely by its market price; mobility and utility are just as important. Firms that can connect these “pipes” of digital finance gain better liquidity, faster execution and strategic flexibility at scale, enabling them to deploy capital more effectively across trading, hedging and yield-generating activities.

Advertisement

This shift also signals a broader trend, with custody evolving beyond its traditional role. Once synonymous with storage, it now functions as a dynamic, active layer that validates, transfers, and interacts with assets programmatically. Institutional investors evaluating service providers should look beyond security and regulatory compliance to consider the ability to support fast, interconnected and reliable market activity.

Looking ahead, interoperability and network connectivity, not just regulatory clarity, will define which institutions can scale efficiently in crypto markets. Those that build their strategies around connected, integrated infrastructure will be positioned to capitalise on opportunities that siloed competitors cannot.

As institutional participation deepens, the competitive edge in crypto markets will increasingly come from how effectively firms can deploy and mobilise capital. Connectivity, interoperability and real-time collateral mobility will define the infrastructure institutions rely on to trade, hedge and manage risk at scale. Those that prioritise integrated systems today will be better positioned to navigate a market that is becoming faster, more interconnected and more operationally demanding.

Paul Frost-Smith, CEO, Komainu

Advertisement

Ask an Expert

Q1: What defines the next phase of institutional crypto market structure?

The next phase is defined by convergence with traditional financial infrastructure. Crypto is no longer operating as a parallel system; it is being absorbed into existing institutional frameworks. This shows up in three areas: regulated custody, tokenized financial instruments and stablecoins as settlement rails. Institutions are not adopting crypto for speculation, but for balance sheet efficiency, faster settlement and programmable financial flows. The market structure is shifting from exchange-led liquidity to infrastructure-led integration.

Q2: Where is the real value being created right now?

The value is moving down the stack into infrastructure. Custody, tokenization platforms and stablecoin issuance are becoming the core control points. These layers determine how assets are issued, transferred and settled. Distribution still matters, but control over settlement and asset representation is where defensibility is forming. This is why we are seeing traditional players focus on tokenized money market funds, on-chain repo and institutional-grade stablecoins.

Advertisement

Q3: What are the key risks institutions need to solve for?

The primary risk is not volatility, but coordination across legal, technical and operational layers. Tokenized assets can settle instantly, but ownership rights, compliance rules and jurisdictional enforcement still operate off-chain. This creates a structural mismatch. Institutions need systems where the ledger, compliance logic and legal frameworks are aligned. Without that, speed introduces risk rather than efficiency.

Sam Boboev, founder, Fintech Wrap Up


Keep Reading

  • Bitcoin enters the public bond market as Moody’s gives a first-of-its-kind crypto deal a rating.
  • Franklin Templeton is launching a dedicated cryptocurrency division, Franklin Crypto, anchored by its planned acquisition of crypto investment firm 250 Digital.
  • Australia has passed its first comprehensive crypto law, requiring exchanges and custody platforms to obtain financial services licenses within six months.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

Crypto World

Stablecoins Dominate Crypto Trading as Retail Activity Drops: CEX.io

Published

on

Stablecoins Dominate Crypto Trading as Retail Activity Drops: CEX.io

Stablecoins were a rare bright spot in an otherwise subdued crypto market in the first quarter, with supply growth and transaction activity pointing to sustained demand even as broader market conditions weakened.

Total stablecoin supply increased by roughly $8 billion to a record $315 billion in Q1, according to data from CEX.IO. Although this marked the slowest pace of expansion since Q4 of 2023, it still represented growth during a period when the wider crypto market contracted.

The data suggests investors rotated into stablecoins as a defensive strategy, boosting their share of overall market activity. Stablecoins accounted for 75% of total crypto trading volume during the quarter — the highest level on record.

Stablecoins’ share of total digital asset trading volume exceeded its 2022 peak. Source: CEX.io

At the same time, total stablecoin transaction volume topped $28 trillion, underscoring their growing role as the primary liquidity layer of the digital asset market. The figure extends a multi-year surge in activity, with stablecoin volumes in recent years exceeding those of major payment networks like Visa and Mastercard combined.

However, data on underlying activity painted a more nuanced picture.

Advertisement

Retail-sized transfers — typically associated with individual users — declined by 16% in the first quarter, the steepest drop on record. In contrast, automated activity surged, with bots accounting for approximately 76% of all stablecoin transaction volume.

The shift toward bot-driven flows suggests that a growing share of stablecoin usage is tied to algorithmic trading, arbitrage and liquidity provisioning, rather than retail demand. While elevated automation can reflect more sophisticated or institutional participation, it may also signal weaker organic demand during bearish market conditions. 

Related: Circle shares surge as Bernstein sees upside from stablecoin adoption

Divergence between major stablecoin issuers

One of the CEX.io report’s key takeaways was a widening divergence between major stablecoin issuers. The supply of Circle’s USDC (USDC) grew by roughly $2 billion in the first quarter, while Tether’s USDt (USDT) declined by about $3 billion, marking the first notable split between the two since Q2 of 2022 amid the bear market.

Advertisement

The trend aligns with earlier Cointelegraph reporting, which highlighted a surge in USDC transfer activity in February, pointing to increased usage across trading and onchain transactions.

USDC is now more widely used for “financial operations,” which include trading and onchain transactions. Source: CEX.io

Beyond USDC, much of the growth in stablecoin issuance was driven by yield-bearing products — a segment that has drawn increasing scrutiny in the US. Ongoing discussions around a crypto market structure bill in Congress have placed yield at the center of debate, with traditional banks pushing back against stablecoins that offer interest-like returns.

The market for yield-bearing stablecoins is currently valued at around $3.7 billion, with daily trading volumes exceeding $100 million, according to data from CoinGecko.

Related: Crypto Biz: Stablecoin jitters meet institutional momentum