Connect with us
DAPA Banner

Crypto World

Why did Ethereum Foundation unstake $40M in ETH?

Published

on

What wiped out $1.7 billion?

The Ethereum Foundation has unstaked 17,035.326 ETH, worth about $40 million, shortly after moving close to its 70,000 ETH staking target. 

Summary

  • Ethereum Foundation unstaked 17,035 ETH worth $40 million after nearing its 70,000 ETH staking target.
  • The foundation deposited wstETH into Lido’s unstETH contract and awaits ETH after withdrawal queue completion.
  • Market users questioned a possible sale, but the foundation has not explained the transaction yet.

Arkham data showed the transaction on Saturday. The foundation deposited wrapped staked ETH into Lido’s unstETH contract. The ETH will return after the withdrawal queue completes, based on Ethereum’s normal unstaking process.

The Ethereum Foundation began staking ETH after changing its policy in June 2025. The group said staking and DeFi activity would help fund protocol research, development, and ecosystem grants.

Advertisement

Since February, the foundation has increased its staked ETH balance. It started with 2,016 ETH, added 22,517 ETH in March, and later staked more than 45,000 ETH this month.

Those transactions lifted its total staked ETH to about 69,500 ETH. The figure placed the foundation close to its stated 70,000 ETH staking goal before the latest withdrawal.

Unstaking raises market questions

The Ethereum Foundation has not explained why it unstaked over 17,000 ETH. The lack of a public reason led some market users to question whether the ETH could move to exchanges or be sold.

Advertisement

One user wrote, “The biggest seller of ETH continues to be the people who created ETH.” The comment reflected market concern, though no official statement has linked the unstaking move to a sale.

In Ethereum, staking locks ETH to help secure the network through validators. Unstaking starts a withdrawal request, places funds in a queue, and releases ETH after the waiting period ends.

DeFi recovery efforts continue after rsETH exploit

The move also comes as DeFi protocols work to support rsETH after a large Kelp restaking exploit. The incident involved more than 116,000 restaked ETH tokens and left bad debt across lending markets.

Aave has led a DeFi United recovery effort with support from Lido DAO, Golem Foundation, EtherFi Foundation, and Mantle. Backers have pledged more than 43,500 ETH, worth about $101 million, to help stabilize rsETH.

Advertisement

Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin has also warned about risks tied to large foundation staking. He said heavy staking by the foundation could create governance concerns during disputed hard forks.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

Crypto World

Six free Bitcoin cloud mining apps to try in 2026 (earn Bitcoin on Android and iOS)

Published

on

Six free Bitcoin cloud mining apps to try in 2026 (earn Bitcoin on Android and iOS) - 1

Disclosure: This article does not represent investment advice. The content and materials featured on this page are for educational purposes only.

Mobile cloud mining grows in 2026 as users seek easier Bitcoin mining access through Android and iOS apps.

Advertisement

Summary

  • BM Blockchain offers a beginner-friendly mobile platform for Bitcoin cloud mining without owning hardware.
  • Focused on digital infrastructure, BM Blockchain provides guided onboarding and simple access to computing resources.
  • BM Blockchain includes welcome allocations for new users, making cloud mining easier to explore in 2026.

The mobile cloud mining market is still growing, as more people want to try Bitcoin mining without buying hardware or setting up their own rigs. On Android and iOS, “free” cloud mining in 2026 usually means one of three things: the app itself is free to use, a few free activation periods, or there are beginner promos that make it easier to get started.

Instead of sticking to one standard approach, this space now covers everything from infrastructure providers to cloud mining services, mining marketplaces, and mining options tied to exchanges. For those who are new to it, a good place to start is usually a platform that’s easy to use, explains how access works in plain terms, and lets you manage your account from your phone.

Top free cloud mining platforms (2026 comparison)

Platform Best For Mobile Access Free / Intro Access Model
BM Blockchain Beginner-friendly exploration of platform-based mining access Mobile-friendly platform access Industry materials reference onboarding-related allocations valued at up to $108 Daily stable income
ECOS Long-term contract-based cloud mining access Android / iOS app Free app access, with cloud mining contracts and hosted services managed in-app
StormGain App-based cloud mining activation Android app Free Bitcoin mining cycles inside the app
Bitdeer Infrastructure-backed cloud mining services Android app Free app access with cloud mining and mining-management tools
NiceHash Mining management and marketplace monitoring Android / iOS app Free app access for wallet, rig, and marketplace management
Binance Pool Exchange-linked mining ecosystem Mobile ecosystem support Free access to pool and mining-related services within the Binance ecosystem

The comparison above is based on current public platform descriptions, app store listings, and publicly referenced industry materials.

Advertisement

1. BM Blockchain — Best for users looking for a low-barrier starting point

BM Blockchain can be described as a beginner-friendly choice for people who want to try Bitcoin cloud mining using a mobile-friendly platform that’s more focused on infrastructure. Public information about the company says it centers on taking part in digital infrastructure, getting access to computing resources, and offering a guided onboarding process.

Those same sources also mention welcome allocations for new users, valued at up to $108, which are presented as participation incentives rather than promised financial results. If someone wants an easier way to get started, BM Blockchain might be attractive to people who prefer using a platform instead of owning mining hardware themselves.

The focus isn’t really on building and maintaining mining machines, but on trying out infrastructure tools and different ways to participate through a simple, accessible interface.

Six free Bitcoin cloud mining apps to try in 2026 (earn Bitcoin on Android and iOS) - 1

2. ECOS — Best for users exploring structured cloud mining access

ECOS often shows up in 2026 cloud mining roundups because its public app info and platform pages focus on contract-based access to Bitcoin mining, hosted infrastructure, and centralized management features. Its Android and iOS listings describe a cloud mining setup where users can handle contracts, infrastructure services, and related tools all in one place.

So ECOS can work as a good reference point for people who want something more organized, not just an app you tap once a day. It’s easier to think of it as a platform for managing mining services than as a one-click, bonus-focused product.

Advertisement

3. StormGain — Best for free in-app mining cycles

StormGain is still one of the more well-known names among “free mining apps” because its public info specifically talks about free Bitcoin mining cycles inside the app. The app description says that anyone can start mining with one tap, and that they earn Bitcoin daily based on how they use the app and the platform’s rules.

That’s why StormGain tends to stand out for people looking for an easy way to get started on mobile. Still, it’s worth reading the platform terms closely, since mining rewards in an app may not work the same way as a traditional cloud mining contract.

4. Bitdeer — Best for infrastructure-backed cloud mining access

Bitdeer is often mentioned as a company with a wider set of mining services, such as cloud mining, mining hardware, infrastructure management, and some mobile tools. In the description for its public Android app, it describes itself as a provider that covers the full range of Bitcoin mining services.

For people who’d rather use something that feels tied to real mining infrastructure instead of just an app with a gamified layer, Bitdeer is still one of the more recognizable names in this space.

Advertisement

5. NiceHash — Best for mining marketplace and management tools

NiceHash isn’t really a typical “free cloud mining app.” It’s more like a marketplace for mining power, along with a set of tools to manage everything around it. The official mobile app lets users handle their wallet, account settings, and mining rigs while they’re away from their computer, which makes it a better fit for people who want clear visibility and hands-on control instead of a simple, bonus-style setup.

Since NiceHash runs as a hashpower marketplace, it’s particularly helpful for anyone who wants to keep an eye on mining performance and make practical decisions about their mining setup from a phone.

6. Binance Pool — Best for exchange-integrated mining services

Binance Pool stands out mainly because it ties mining services into a broader exchange ecosystem. In Binance’s public materials, they highlight things like seeing their hash rate in real time, having a few different payout options, and being able to access mining-related services from within the wider Binance platform.

This mix makes Binance Pool a good fit for people who already use Binance and want some mining exposure while also using the platform for trading and managing their assets.

Advertisement

How to choose the right free Bitcoin cloud mining app in 2026

For most people, the real question isn’t just which platform claims to be “free,” but what “free” actually means in day-to-day use. In reality, one platform might lure you in with a sign-up bonus, another might give users a few free activation rounds, and another might let them use the app for free while the actual mining service still requires a contract.

A practical evaluation should look at four things:

  • what “free” means on the platform
  • how clearly the access model is explained
  • whether mobile tools are actually useful for management and monitoring
  • whether fees, rewards, and participation conditions are disclosed in a way that matches the user’s experience level and risk tolerance

Conclusion

Bitcoin cloud mining apps in 2026 aren’t really built around just one kind of product anymore. The market now covers a range of options, like services that focus on infrastructure, apps where users activate mining through the platform, mining marketplaces, and platforms tied closely to exchanges.

For Android and iOS users, it usually makes sense to start with whatever fits the way a user wants to get in — whether they’re looking for beginner perks, standard cloud mining contracts, tools to manage things from their phone, or something that plugs into a bigger ecosystem. Some platforms also use onboarding offers to make it easier for new users to start.One example people mention publicly is the $108 welcome allocation linked to BM Blockchain.

As usual, users should compare the terms, be clear on what each platform means when it says “free,” and read the platform rules and conditions carefully before getting involved.

Advertisement

Frequently Asked Questions

What do people usually mean by “free Bitcoin cloud mining” in 2026?

Most of the time, “free” means users can use the app for free, activate a short free cycle, try mining for a limited time, or get a sign-up bonus. It usually doesn’t mean they get unlimited mining power forever at no cost. It’s worth checking whether the “free”part is just for creating an account, a one-time bonus, or a short trial.

Can someone actually earn Bitcoin on Android and iOS without buying mining hardware?

Some services allow users to use their phone, letting them try cloud mining without owning any physical machines. That said, they can be very different depending on the platform. Sometimes it’s just a starter cycle or access to tools and infrastructure, not the user personally running dedicated mining hardware.

Advertisement

Are free cloud mining apps safe to use?

It depends on the app. People usually look for clear contract terms, easy-to-understand payout rules, public info about the company or its infrastructure, and withdrawal rules that make sense. Common red flags are “guaranteed”returns that sound too good, no real company details, or fees that aren’texplained clearly.

Can cloud mining give daily Bitcoin payouts?

Some platforms show daily projections, use daily reward systems, or pay out on a recurring schedule, but what users actually receive can depend on the platform’s rules, fees, the market, and what kind of mining setup they’re using. Daily numbers are better seen as estimates, not something automatically guaranteed.

Advertisement

How should beginners pick a cloud mining platform?

For those who are new, the basics usually matter most: whether it’s easy to use, whether the plans are explained clearly, whether it works smoothly on mobile, and how transparent it is about rewards, fees, and withdrawals. A platform often feels more beginner-friendly when the interface is simple, and it clearly explains what users are turning on and what they’re getting.

Why do some platforms offer sign-up incentives like a $108 welcome allocation?

These offers are usually meant to make it easier to start and to let new users try the platform’s tools or beginner-level features. They’re typically framed as a way to participate or explore, rather than a promise of guaranteed profit.

Advertisement

What’s the safest way to start with a free cloud mining app?

A careful way to begin is to stick to free or limited features first, read the rules, try a withdrawal if it can proceed, and make sure users understand how it works before putting in more time or money. People often suggest this step-by-step approach for beginners testing cloud-mining services.

Disclosure: This content is provided by a third party. Neither crypto.news nor the author of this article endorses any product mentioned on this page. Users should conduct their own research before taking any action related to the company.

Advertisement

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Crypto World

Litecoin Chain Rollback Raises Security Questions

Published

on

Litecoin Chain Rollback Raises Security Questions

Litecoin’s emergency 13-block reorganization to reverse a zero-day attack has reignited debate about whether transaction finality can be trusted and whether the network is truly secure.

The incident reveals an uncomfortable truth: blockchain immutability is conditional, not absolute.

Transaction Finality Is Not Guaranteed

For years, crypto advocates have marketed blockchains as immutable ledgers where transactions cannot be reversed. Yet the Litecoin network just demonstrated that a coordinated attack, combined with unpatched nodes, can force it to rewrite its history.

While developers justified the reorg because the blocks contained invalid transactions, the question remains unsettling: how many confirmations make a transaction feel secure if a single bug can erase 13 blocks?

Advertisement
Litecoin, Source: X

Unpatched Litecoin Nodes Created the Vulnerability

The zero-day attack succeeded because many Litecoin nodes ran outdated software that improperly validated MWEB transactions. This created a two-tier network in which different participants operated under distinct consensus rules.

Bitcoin and Litecoin have no mandatory update mechanism. Nodes can run old software indefinitely. While philosophically important, this freedom created the exact vulnerability exploited in the attack.

Miners and exchanges running unpatched software became unintended participants in enabling the exploit.

Advertisement

The zero-day specifically targeted MWEB, Litecoin’s privacy feature. Privacy adds complexity, and complexity creates attack surfaces. MWEB is still young, and this exploit suggests it needs further hardening before users should trust large-value transfers.

Solana Trolling Litecoin on X

Finality Problem for Investors

Litecoin’s smaller hash rate and lower security budget make it more vulnerable to both bugs and future attacks. A 13-block reorg represents roughly 2.5 hours of history. On Bitcoin, reversing such a depth would cost billions and require controlling 51% of the network.

Users should consider how many confirmations they feel safe with, given this reality. Six confirmations may not be sufficient if a buggy client release can trigger a 13-block reorg.

Can Litecoin restore trust?

Technically, Litecoin developers have fixed the issue. But the incident exposes how dependent decentralized networks are on coordinated node updates and careful operator behavior. The network recovered, but it did not emerge unscathed.

For casual transactions, Litecoin likely remains safe. For long-term wealth storage, the incident raises legitimate questions about finality and whether transaction history can be rewritten at scale.

Advertisement

The post Litecoin Chain Rollback Raises Security Questions appeared first on BeInCrypto.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Crypto World

Strategy’s Bitcoin plan under fire as Peter Schiff warns crash

Published

on

Crypto bank takes stake in Strategy’s STRC

Peter Schiff has warned that Strategy, formerly known as MicroStrategy, could face pressure from its latest funding approach. 

Summary

  • Peter Schiff warned that Strategy’s preferred shares could increase pressure on its Bitcoin treasury plan.
  • Schiff said the 11.5% yield may force Strategy to raise capital or sell Bitcoin.
  • Strategy supporters argue Bitcoin gains can cover costs, but Schiff says new issuance changes the math.

The gold advocate and long-time Bitcoin critic focused on the company’s use of high-yield preferred shares. Schiff said the preferred shares carry an 11.5% yield. He argued that this creates a large cost for Strategy as the company continues to raise funds linked to its Bitcoin buying plan.

Strategy supporters argue that Bitcoin needs to rise only 2% each year to help cover the yield on the preferred shares. Schiff challenged that view and said it does not account for more issuance.

Advertisement

“The more STRC MSTR sells, the more BTC must rise to cover the yield,” Schiff wrote. 

His comment suggested that each new preferred share sale could raise the pressure on Strategy’s Bitcoin holdings. Schiff also said Strategy lacks normal corporate earnings that can easily fund these payouts. He argued that this could force the company to raise more capital or sell Bitcoin.

Bitcoin sales could pressure Strategy

Schiff warned that a forced Bitcoin sale could create more market pressure. In his view, selling Bitcoin may lower the asset’s price and make Strategy’s balance sheet weaker.

He also said a fall in the preferred shares could push the company to offer higher yields. That could raise funding costs and increase the strain on Strategy’s capital structure.

Advertisement

“The only way to stop the death spiral is for MSTR to cancel the dividend,” Schiff said. He added that such a move could hurt STRC, MSTR, and Bitcoin.

Saylor’s Bitcoin strategy faces scrutiny

Michael Saylor has built Strategy into one of the largest corporate Bitcoin holders. The company has used debt, equity sales, and other instruments to add more BTC over several years.

Schiff said on April 18 that Strategy can no longer rely as easily on selling common shares at a premium. He claimed the company may need to sell more preferred shares, discounted common stock, or Bitcoin to meet its obligations.

The warning adds to the debate around Strategy’s Bitcoin treasury model. Supporters see the approach as a long-term Bitcoin bet, while critics say rising funding costs could create risk if Bitcoin prices weaken.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Crypto World

Brad Garlinghouse wins top Harvard business leadership award

Published

on

Brad Garlinghouse wins top Harvard business leadership award

Ripple CEO Brad Garlinghouse has been named the 2026 Business Leader of the Year by the Harvard Business School Association of Northern California. 

Summary

  • Brad Garlinghouse received Harvard’s 2026 Business Leader of the Year award in San Francisco this week.
  • Harvard praised Garlinghouse for scaling Ripple while keeping focus on the company’s long-term business vision.
  • Ripple expanded through major acquisitions, global licenses, and XRP ETF momentum after its SEC battle.

The award was presented during a dinner at the Julia Morgan Ballroom in San Francisco. The Harvard Business School Association of Northern California has given the award since 1969. Past recipients include Amazon CEO Andy Jassy, former Cisco CEO John Chambers, and Intel co-founder Gordon Moore.

Harvard Business School Professor David B. Yoffie praised Garlinghouse’s leadership at Ripple. He pointed to the CEO’s work in building the company while keeping its core business direction in place.

Advertisement

Yoffie said Garlinghouse showed an “extraordinary ability to scale a complex platform while maintaining a steadfast commitment to his core vision.” The comment came as Garlinghouse marked 11 years at Ripple.

Garlinghouse’s path at Ripple

Garlinghouse joined Ripple in April 2015 as chief operating officer after earlier executive roles at AOL and Yahoo. He later became CEO in 2016 after co-founder Chris Larsen brought him into the company.

Before joining Ripple, Garlinghouse had reportedly considered a role at Uber. He later became one of the most visible executives in the crypto sector, especially during Ripple’s long legal dispute with the SEC.

Advertisement

Ripple expands after legal battle

Ripple has continued to grow after its legal fight with the SEC. Garlinghouse has also become a leading voice in calls for clearer crypto rules in the United States.

Over the past year, Ripple completed large acquisitions, including GTreasury for $1 billion and Hidden Road for $1.25 billion. The company later rebranded Hidden Road as Ripple Prime, a clearing platform focused on institutional finance.

Ripple also secured key licenses in global markets, including an Electronic Money Institution license in the United Kingdom. The company has also benefited from growing interest in XRP products after XRP spot ETFs launched last year.

The Harvard award adds another public milestone for Garlinghouse as Ripple expands its role in crypto payments, custody, stablecoins, and institutional markets.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Crypto World

CLARITY Act Will “Get Done” in May, Galaxy Digital CEO Mike Novogratz Says

Published

on

Brian Armstrong's Bold Prediction: AI Agents Will Soon Dominate Global Financial

TLDR:

  • Galaxy Digital CEO Mike Novogratz expects the CLARITY Act to reach Trump’s desk for signing by June 2026.
  • Galaxy’s Alex Thorn puts the odds of the CLARITY Act passing in 2026 at 50%, citing Senate delays as a key risk.
  • Senator Cynthia Lummis warned that failing to pass the CLARITY Act now could delay reform until at least 2030.
  • The CLARITY Act could unlock U.S. financial market access for an estimated 5.5 billion people across the globe.

The CLARITY Act remains one of the most closely watched pieces of legislation in the crypto space. Galaxy Digital CEO Mike Novogratz stated the bill will likely be finalized in May.

He expects President Trump to sign it into law in June. The bill aims to give the U.S. crypto industry a clearer regulatory framework.

Its passage could open American financial markets to over 5.5 billion people worldwide who currently lack access.

CLARITY Act Timeline Draws Both Confidence and Caution

Novogratz shared his outlook during a podcast with SkyBridge Capital founder Anthony Scaramucci. He said the bill would go to committee in the first week of May.

Advertisement

He added that it would be signed shortly after by President Trump. His comments came after a disappointing week for the industry. The Senate Banking Committee did not schedule a markup hearing as many had anticipated.

The CEO emphasized the bill’s broad political appeal. He said it is “wildly important” for both Democrats and Republicans to see it through.

This bipartisan support has been a consistent talking point among industry advocates. However, that support has not yet translated into a clear legislative path forward.

The CLARITY Act passed the House in July 2025 with backing from both parties. Yet ongoing disputes have slowed its progress through the Senate.

Advertisement

A major sticking point involves stablecoin yields. The banking sector has raised concerns that such yields could undermine their competitive position in the market.

U.S. Senator Cynthia Lummis issued a stark warning on April 10. She posted on X: “This is our last chance to pass the Clarity Act until at least 2030.

We can’t afford to surrender America’s financial future.” Her statement added urgency to an already pressured legislative calendar heading into May.

Industry Analysts See Mixed Odds for CLARITY Act in 2026

Galaxy Digital’s head of firmwide research, Alex Thorn, offered a more measured view. He put the current odds of the CLARITY Act passing in 2026 at 50%.

Advertisement

Thorn shared this estimate in an X post earlier in the week. He also released a detailed research report outlining the legislative risks involved.

Thorn had expected the Senate Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs Committee to announce a markup hearing. That announcement was anticipated for the last week of April.

It did not happen as expected. He warned that if the markup process slips past mid-May, the odds of passage will drop sharply.

Novogratz, meanwhile, pointed to the broader economic case for the legislation. He noted that large institutions like SpaceX and Google could be tokenized and sold to global investors.

Advertisement

He also said a crypto wallet on a smartphone would allow people in countries like Bhutan, Botswana, Bolivia, and Paraguay to participate in the U.S. economy. That vision, he argued, is central to the bill’s purpose.

The CLARITY Act carries weight beyond the crypto market alone. A number of firms left the U.S. during the Biden administration due to regulatory uncertainty.

Clearer rules could bring those firms back and attract new ones. Whether Congress acts in time remains the central question heading into May.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Crypto World

Bybit CEO says firms need MiFID, EMI licenses for European profit

Published

on

Bybit CEO says firms need MiFID, EMI licenses for European profit

Snagging a Markets in Crypto Assets (MiCA) license to operate in Europe is great, but, alone, it won’t be enough to turn a profit, according to Ben Zhou, the CEO of Bybit, one of the largest cryptocurrency trading platforms.

MiCA doesn’t cover the full range of products, such as derivatives and tokenized assets, needed to be profitable, Zhou said in an interview. For those, companies also need a MiFID II (Markets in Financial Instruments Directive) license and an Electronic Money Institution (EMI) license.

“With the current MiCA framework, you can only do fiat-to-crypto, crypto-to-crypto,” Zhou said. “There are many elements of a profitable business you cannot do, so even as a MiCA holder — unless you’re Kraken or BItpanda or Bitvivo, who are already making money because they have multiple licenses.”

Even Bybit, the world’s second-largest cryptocurrency exchange by trading volume, is some way off from breaking even in Europe, Zhou said. That timeline depends on when the firm acquires the other licenses it needs.

Advertisement

“We don’t make money under the current MiCA license. But we’re able to afford it because we’re a big entity. For us, it’s a long-term investment,” Zhou said. “It could be five years away, but I think that is a bit long. I would assume we are probably going to be profitable within two years.”

Market consolidation is coming

A MiCA license issued by one country allows a crypto-asset service provider to operate across the European Economic Area (EEA): all 27 members of the European Union, as well as Norway, Iceland and Liechtenstein.

Now is a critical juncture for many small to medium-sized crypto companies in Europe, because the MiCA grandfathering period closes at the end of June. That means firms must have obtained MiCA authorization to operate across the region by July 1 — a cut-off point that is widely expected to be the death knell for many smaller crypto firms.

“There’s going to be market consolidation,” Zhou said. “That’s why these guys are shutting down. Because even if they know they could afford MiCA, they’re like, ‘WTF, I need [MiFID, EMI] to make money, and I need to make a whole lot of investment in compliance infrastructure to be able to be profitable?’”

Advertisement

MiCA itself is undergoing change, with some country regulators calling for tighter, more centralized control and granting increased oversight to bodies such as the European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA). And when it comes to structured products, ESMA recently reminded crypto firms offering perpetual futures that some of these products may fall outside the rules.

Zhou said Bybit chose a stringent regulator in Austria’s FMA, a decision he said will pay dividends down the line. Each country interprets MiCA differently, he said: “Some countries interpret it as a way to attract new business; some want heavy regulation. So you actually have different levels of strictness.”

As for bringing ESMA into the mix, Bybit is neutral, Zhou said.

“There are talks about a more level playing field,” he said. “But there could be disadvantages. Because when you have a local regulator they are easy to get to. If we have any issues, we just send an email and go to FMA in Vienna. But if everyone’s in Paris, then you have to line up. There are more CASPs, increased bureaucracy, decreased efficiency.”

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Crypto World

Could Pepeto Be the Best Crypto to Buy in 2026 While BTC Tests $80K and ETH Holds Above $2,300?

Published

on

Could Pepeto Be the Best Crypto to Buy in 2026 While BTC Tests $80K and ETH Holds Above $2,300?

The crypto market just flipped into greed territory for the first time in weeks, and the Fear and Greed Index hitting 60 has every trader asking which token carries the biggest returns from here.

Finding the best crypto to buy in 2026 means looking past coins that already ran and finding entries that still carry distance between where they sit and where they go.

BTC is testing $80,000 with $996 million in weekly ETF inflows, and a presale launched by the mind behind the first Pepe token has gathered more than $9.5 million from wallets that verified the live tools before sending capital.

Bitcoin touched $79,388 on April 22 before pulling back to $77,800 as profit taking hit altcoins harder than the leader.

Advertisement

Weekly ETF inflows reached $996 million with Bitcoin products leading the charge according to 24/7 Wall Street, and growing expectations around the CLARITY Act markup in the Senate added a regulatory tailwind that the market had not priced in.

The rally is real, but the question now is whether the best returns from here come from large caps or from entries that have not hit the open market yet.

Tokens Positioned for the Next Leg of the Recovery

Pepeto

While the market watches BTC test resistance, the best crypto to buy in 2026 might be sitting in a presale most traders have not found yet. Pepeto is a marketplace that turns meme coin trading into a verified ecosystem where every tool runs live and every contract carries a SolidProof audit. It was built by the cofounder who created the original Pepe coin, with 420 trillion supply matching the same token structure that went from zero to billions the first time.

The risk scorer scans contracts for warning signs before capital gets committed, catching scams that move faster than news so the wallet stays protected during fast rotations that follow big BTC moves. PepetoSwap handles zero fee trades across tokens, keeping the full value of each position inside the wallet instead of leaking to platform charges.

Advertisement

178% APY staking layers returns above the presale position, and the expected Binance listing draws closer while that reward compounds. The presale sits at $0.000000186, and more than $9.5 million has been gathered from wallets that ran through the live platform before committing.

The 100x target from one expected Binance debut holds because presale to exchange is the window where every previous crypto fortune started, and the wallets buying now join that group before the crowd pays full price. Visit Pepeto to check the tools live.

Ethereum (ETH)

ETH trades near $2,316 according to CoinMarketCap, holding above $2,300 while BTC leads the rally.

The network still dominates smart contract development with over 31,000 active developers, but ETH needs to reclaim $2,800 before the recovery pattern confirms.

Advertisement

From $2,400 the path to the $4,800 peak is a 2x, solid for a portfolio anchor but far from the multiplier math that presale entries carry ahead of a listing event.

Bitcoin (BTC)

BTC sits near $77,258 according to CoinMarketCap, testing the $80,000 level that has acted as resistance since the pullback from the October 2025 peak of $126,000. Weekly ETF inflows at $996 million show institutional demand is real, and the CLARITY Act could open the door to bigger allocations.

The math from $77,258 to a new high above $126,000 is a 1.6x, strong by traditional standards but modest compared to presale entries that carry 100x projections from a single listing event.

Conclusion

Will BTC break $80,000? The signals point toward higher levels as ETF demand and regulation clarity build across the market. But the signals for Pepeto point at something beyond a market recovery, they point at the same setup that produced every early buyer success story in crypto.

Advertisement

Every cycle creates winners who entered during fear and collected wealth during recovery, and the expected Binance listing will separate the wallets that entered from everyone who reads about them afterward.

Entering the Pepeto official website enow is how those wallets plan to be on the right side of that line when trading opens.

Click To Visit Pepeto Website To Enter The Presale

FAQs

Advertisement

What is the best crypto to buy in 2026 right now?

BTC and ETH carry strength, but presale entries like Pepeto offer the distance between current price and listing that large caps cannot match.

Why are traders choosing Pepeto over large caps?

A SolidProof audit, zero fee trading, and an expected Binance listing at presale pricing explain why more than $9.5 million entered the Pepeto official website.

Advertisement

Will BTC reach $100,000 this year?

That is a real possibility if ETF inflows continue and the CLARITY Act passes, but the timeline depends on broader market conditions.


Disclaimer: This is a Press Release provided by a third party who is responsible for the content. Please conduct your own research before taking any action based on the content.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Crypto World

Ethereum Foundation Unstakes 17K ETH After Nearing 70K Staking Goal

Published

on

Source: Arkham

The Ethereum Foundation has moved to unwind part of its staking position shortly after nearing its stated goal of 70,000 staked ETH.

On Saturday, the Ethereum Foundation unstaked 17,035.326 ETH, worth roughly $40 million, according to Arkham data. The move involved depositing wrapped staked ETH (wstETH) into Lido’s unstETH contract, with ETH expected to be returned once the withdrawal queue completes.

In Ethereum, unstaking is the process of withdrawing ETH that was previously locked to help secure the network through validators. When ETH is staked, it’s deposited into the Ethereum Beacon Chain, where it remains locked while earning rewards. To unstake, a withdrawal request is initiated, and the funds enter a queue period after which the funds are released.

Source: Arkham
Source: Arkham

Source: Arkham

The Ethereum Foundation has not yet revealed why it unstaked 17,000 ETH, prompting some users to speculate it could be preparing to sell. “The biggest seller of ETH continues to be the people who created ETH,” one user wrote.

Advertisement

Related: Another DeFi protocol hacked as Sui-based Volo hit by $3.5M exploit

Ethereum Foundation nears 70K staked ETH goal

The EF started staking ETH after updating its policy in June 2025. At the time, the foundation said that staking and decentralized finance participation would help fund protocol research, development and ecosystem grants.

Since February, the foundation has steadily expanded its position, staking 2,016 ETH initially, followed by 22,517 ETH in March. Earlier this month, the foundation staked more than 45,000 ETH in a series of transactions, bringing the total to around 69,500 ETH, just shy of its internal 70,000 ETH staking target.

However, concerns remain over governance risks. Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin has cautioned that large-scale staking by the foundation could complicate neutrality during potential contentious hard forks, where competing chains may emerge.

Advertisement

Related: Ethereum Risks 10% Dip Versus Bitcoin Despite ETH Staking Milestone

DeFi protocols unite to back rsETH

As Cointelegraph reported, decentralized finance protocols have joined forces to stabilize rsETH after a $293 million exploit on the Kelp restaking platform triggered market disruption. The incident involved hackers stealing over 116,000 restaked ETH tokens and using them as collateral to borrow funds, leaving roughly $195 million in bad debt on Aave and straining the broader DeFi lending market.

Backers have pledged over 43,500 ETH (around $101 million) in a coordinated “DeFi United” effort led by Aave, with participation from Lido DAO, Golem Foundation and major contributions from EtherFi Foundation and Mantle.

Magazine: Ethereum’s Fusaka fork explained for dummies: What the hell is PeerDAS?

Advertisement
Cointelegraph is committed to independent, transparent journalism. This news article is produced in accordance with Cointelegraph’s Editorial Policy and aims to provide accurate and timely information. Readers are encouraged to verify information independently.

Source link

Continue Reading

Crypto World

Bitcoin Short Squeeze Fuels Price Rally Amid Rising CPI and Derivatives Risk

Published

on

Brian Armstrong's Bold Prediction: AI Agents Will Soon Dominate Global Financial

TLDR:

  • Open Interest spiked sharply in April, signaling crowded and unstable positioning across Bitcoin derivatives markets.
  • Negative funding rates during the rally confirm shorts are being squeezed out, not that bulls are leading organically.
  • Perp CVD is rising while Spot CVD stays flat, proving the current move lacks genuine spot market buying support.
  • Bitcoin must hold above $80,000 to target $85,000 — a breakdown below that level reopens significant downside pressure.

Bitcoin short squeeze activity is currently driving prices higher in the cryptocurrency market. The Consumer Price Index rose again recently, pointing to sticky inflation that shows no clear resolution.

Despite this, Bitcoin is pushing into a key resistance zone. Analysts note this is not a one-way market. Mixed scenarios and liquidity moves are expected as conflicting signals continue to play out across the market.

Open Interest Spike Points to Crowded and Fragile Market Conditions

Open Interest in Bitcoin’s derivatives market spiked sharply during April. Market analyst Boris of @Fundingvest described the rapid buildup as aggressive and unhealthy positioning.

Such a surge indicates that positions are becoming deeply crowded. This overcrowding makes the current price move unstable and exposed to sudden and sharp reversals.

After the OI spike, funding rates remained negative even as prices climbed. Negative funding during a price rally is a direct indication of crowded short positioning.

In response, the market pushed prices higher, forcing short sellers to cover their positions. This pattern reflects a textbook short squeeze playing out within the derivatives segment.

Advertisement

Meanwhile, Perpetual CVD has been driving prices higher throughout this period. Spot CVD, however, remained largely flat during the same time frame.

Boris pointed out that this divergence makes the analysis straightforward. The current rally is derivative-driven and lacks support from genuine spot market buying activity.

Without spot market backing, the sustainability of this rally remains questionable. Price increases unsupported by spot buyers tend to be temporary. The liquidity built through the short squeeze may later be used against new long positions. This sets up the next key risk forming in the market.

Long Trap Risk Builds as Shorts Exit and New Longs Enter

As shorts exit under pressure, longs are now beginning to take their place. Boris flagged this transition as a possible setup for a long trap in the coming weeks.

Advertisement

A long trap forms when buyers enter aggressively near highs, only to face a sharp reversal. This cycle is a recurring pattern in Bitcoin’s derivatives-driven market.

Bitcoin’s price structure is also forming a minor Higher High and Higher Low sequence. On the surface, this HH-HL pattern carries a mild bullish reading.

However, Boris outlined two clear scenarios based on where price holds from here. A failure to maintain above $80,000 would open the door to further downside pressure.

Conversely, holding above $80,000 could push Bitcoin toward the next target near $85,000. The $80K level is therefore acting as the market’s key line in the sand.

Advertisement

Traders monitoring this structure will seek confirmation of either a breakdown or continuation. The outcome around this price level may define Bitcoin’s short-term trajectory.

CPI data continues to add uncertainty to an already complicated macro setup. Sticky inflation does not offer a clear directional signal for Bitcoin.

With the current derivatives positioning, the market remains exposed to sharp moves in either direction. Caution and active risk management remain essential for all market participants.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Crypto World

Adam Back Challenges the Biggest Claim About Satoshi’s Bitcoin Holdings

Published

on

Adam Back Challenges the Biggest Claim About Satoshi’s Bitcoin Holdings

Adam Back, inventor of Hashcash and a pioneering figure in Bitcoin’s early development, has dismantled the new Satoshi Nakamoto documentary by challenging its core technical assumptions about Bitcoin mining patterns and coin ownership.

Back’s detailed response on X points to critical flaws in how the documentary interprets early mining data and the so-called Patoshi pattern used to estimate Satoshi’s holdings.

The Patoshi Pattern Problem

The documentary relies heavily on the Patoshi pattern, a statistical analysis of Bitcoin block timestamps that researchers claim can identify blocks mined by Satoshi. The analysis suggests Satoshi controlled 500,000 to 1 million Bitcoin by mining roughly 20-40% of blocks in Bitcoin’s first year.

Advertisement

Back argues that this analysis is fundamentally unreliable.

“Clearly there were many other miners (60-80% of hashrate or more even in the first year),” Back wrote.

As the Bitcoin network grew and more participants joined, the pattern became increasingly ambiguous and impossible to verify with certainty.

It has been suggested that as miner participation increased over time, attribution became increasingly unclear, with the Patoshi pattern potentially blending into background noise. This implies the documentary may overstate how precisely early mining activity can be linked to specific actors.

The Flawed “Never Sold” Assumption About Satoshi

The documentary’s central claim rests on the assumption that Satoshi never sold a single Bitcoin, which they argue proves the creator is dead.

Advertisement

This narrative hinges on the belief that a living Satoshi would have spent or sold coins given the extraordinary price appreciation from $0 to $100,000 per Bitcoin.

Back challenges this logic directly. He questions whether the Patoshi pattern can actually prove that Satoshi holds all those coins unsold. Even if the pattern correctly identifies Satoshi’s early mining, it does not prove that those specific coins remain untouched.

“If Satoshi sold any, he could have sold from more recent, more ambiguous coins first,” Back argued.

In other words, Satoshi could have strategically liquidated coins from the ambiguous later mining period when the Patoshi pattern becomes unreliable, and attribution becomes impossible.

Timeline Inconsistencies and Technical Flaws

Back also flagged the documentary’s sloppy handling of timeline evidence. He referenced earlier work by Jameson Lopp showing that Hal Finney was running a marathon at the exact moment Satoshi was sending test transactions on the Bitcoin network, a direct contradiction that disqualifies Finney from the theory.

Advertisement

Back described the documentary’s approach as suffering from “Gell-Mann amnesia,” a term referring to the tendency to dismiss contradictory evidence that emerges after an initial theory is proposed. When the Finney timeline objection was raised, the filmmakers simply shifted their claim to include Len Sassaman without addressing why their original evidence failed.

Additionally, the documentary dismisses EU timezone residents based on forum post analysis, then later pivots to naming Sassaman despite these timezone inconsistencies, Back noted.

This pattern suggests the documentary started with a conclusion. It then worked backward to find supporting evidence rather than following evidence to a conclusion.

The C++ and Windows Problems

Back also highlighted the devastating objection raised by Cam and Len Sassaman’s widow. Sassaman did not know C++ and had never owned a Windows machine. Bitcoin’s original code is written in C++, creating a critical technical barrier.

Advertisement

Additionally, Sassaman was a vocal Bitcoin critic during his lifetime, making his secret role as co-creator highly implausible.

What This Means for the Satoshi Mystery

Back’s analysis does not definitively solve the Satoshi mystery, but it does demolish the documentary’s theory piece by piece. His core argument is that early Bitcoin mining data is too ambiguous. The “never sold coins” assumption is unfounded. It cannot support firm conclusions about Satoshi’s identity.

The debate reveals how difficult it is to prove Satoshi’s identity solely through technical forensics. Even the most sophisticated pattern analysis loses precision over time as the number of network participants grows and mining becomes more distributed.

Other candidates, like Nick Szabo, gained renewed discussion following the documentary’s failure. Some researchers suggest the mystery may never be solved unless Satoshi voluntarily reveals themselves or new evidence surfaces.

Advertisement

The post Adam Back Challenges the Biggest Claim About Satoshi’s Bitcoin Holdings appeared first on BeInCrypto.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2025