Connect with us
DAPA Banner
DAPA Coin
DAPA
COIN PAYMENT ASSET
PRIVACY · BLOCKDAG · HOMOMORPHIC ENCRYPTION · RUST
ElGamal Encrypted MINE DAPA
🚫 GENESIS SOLD OUT
DAPAPAY COMING

Crypto World

XRP price drops to $1.08 as ETF outflows and whale demand fade

Published

on

Source: SoSoValue

XRP traded at $1.08 on July 13 after losing 1.09% over 24 hours and 5.48% across seven days. 

Summary

  • XRP trades near $1.08 as whale transfers and institutional fund demand weaken across the market.
  • Transactions above $1 million fell sharply, leaving traders focused on support around the $1 level.
  • ETF outflows ended a nine-week inflow streak while technical momentum remained weak and largely neutral.

The token moved between $1.07 and $1.10, while trading volume reached about $836 million. Its market value stood near $67.36 billion, keeping the token sixth among cryptocurrencies by market capitalization. The latest decline pushed the asset toward its lowest price in ten days after buyers failed to hold the rebound above $1.10.

The price had recovered from an early July low near $1.01 and briefly challenged resistance around $1.20. Sellers rejected that move, and XRP returned to a narrow range between roughly $1.09 and $1.12. 

Advertisement

Renewed tension between the United States and Iran then weighed on risk assets and helped push XRP below the lower end of that range. The token now sits close to the psychological $1 level, which traders have defended several times since June.

The broader crypto market weakened as Bitcoin slipped below $63,000 and Ether traded near $1,785. That backdrop matters because XRP has followed broader risk sentiment during recent selloffs. A stronger market rebound could support the token, while renewed pressure across assets may keep buyers cautious near current levels.

XRP whale transactions fall sharply

Large transactions on the XRP Ledger have dropped sharply. Crypto analyst Ali Martinez said the number of transfers worth more than $1 million fell from 70 over the previous week to only two on July 13. 

Advertisement

He described whale activity as “cooled significantly.” The data points to less participation from large holders, but it does not show whether whales stopped buying, moved activity off-chain, or split transfers into smaller amounts.

Lower whale activity can reduce buying support during a weak market, especially when daily trading volume also remains limited. It can also reduce large sell orders, so the metric does not carry one fixed meaning. 

Advertisement

As previously reported, XRP exchange balances have fallen to a seven-year low while spot funds and private wallets absorbed supply. That decline has not lifted the price because market demand has remained too weak to overcome the broader downtrend.

ETF inflow streak comes to an end

Fund flows have also turned less supportive. XRP investment products recorded more than $7 million in net withdrawals last week, ending nine straight weeks of inflows. The reversal followed a period when XRP funds attracted capital even as Bitcoin and Ethereum products faced withdrawals. 

Source: SoSoValue
Source: SoSoValue

Earlier demand helped regulated XRP funds build a large position, but one negative week shows that institutional interest can change when market conditions weaken.

XRP ETFs had absorbed close to one billion tokens while exchange reserves dropped by about half. The supply shift created a tighter tradable float, yet XRP continued to fall. 

The difference between fund accumulation and price performance shows that ETF demand alone has not controlled the market. Traders now need to see whether outflows continue or whether the latest red week becomes a brief interruption in the longer inflow trend.

Advertisement

Technical indicators keep $1 support in focus

The Bollinger Bands place XRP in the lower half of its recent trading range. Price sits slightly below the middle band near $1.0879, while the upper band stands around $1.1619 and the lower band near $1.0140. 

Holding above the lower band keeps the token away from a deeper breakdown. A move above the middle band and the $1.09 to $1.10 area would give buyers an early recovery signal.

XRP price chart, source: crypto.news
XRP price chart, source: crypto.news

The Aroon Oscillator remains positive near 21.43, showing that some recent upward pressure still exists. However, the reading has weakened, which points to fading rebound momentum. 

Analyst Grega Horvat said the token was approaching support near $1 and identified $0.95 as another level on the four-hour chart. His statement that “trend is down until it is not” reflects a technical view, not a confirmed price path.

The main short-term battle now sits between support near $1.01 and resistance around $1.10. A close below the lower Bollinger Band could bring $1 and $0.95 back into focus. Horvat also listed $0.60, $0.40 and $0.10 as deeper levels if $0.90 fails, but those targets remain speculative and require a much larger decline from the current price.

A recovery above $1.10 would improve the short-term structure and could open a move toward the upper Bollinger Band near $1.16. XRP would then need to clear the earlier resistance around $1.20 before buyers could claim stronger control. 

EGRAG Crypto has argued that the token needs a bounce toward the 50-period moving average near $1.60 before a longer rally can restart. That scenario remains unconfirmed. For now, price action, ETF flows, whale activity and the $1 support zone will guide the next move.

Advertisement

Disclosure: This article does not represent investment advice. The content and materials featured on this page are for educational purposes only.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

Crypto World

Chipmaker Giant’s June Revenue Jumps 68% in Strongest Month of 2026

Published

on

Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Monthly 2026 Revenue

Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing (TSMC), the world’s largest contract chipmaker, reported June revenue of T$442.68 billion ($13.78 billion).

This marked a 67.9% year-on-year jump, the fastest monthly growth of 2026, driven by artificial intelligence (AI) chip demand.

AI Demand Powers Record Revenue For The Chipmaker Giant

June sales rose 6.2% from May and pushed second-quarter revenue to T$1.27 trillion, or $39.62 billion. That total topped the T$1.264 trillion estimate compiled by LSEG from 20 analysts. Dollar figures reflect an exchange rate of 32.13 New Taiwan dollars to the US dollar.

Follow us on X to get the latest news as it happens 

Advertisement
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Monthly 2026 Revenue
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Monthly 2026 Revenue. Source: TSMC

The monthly figures show clear acceleration. June’s 67.9% growth far outpaced February’s 22.2% and April’s 17.5%, signaling that customers are pulling orders forward amid intensifying AI infrastructure spending.

First-half revenue reached T$2.4 trillion, about $74.99 billion, up 35.6% year-on-year. Notably, in six months, TSMC has already earned about 63% of its entire 2025 revenue of T$3.81 trillion.

TSMC held roughly 73% of the global pure-foundry market in the first quarter, according to Counterpoint Research.

The monthly figures did not include profit or margin details. The chipmaker will disclose full second-quarter earnings on Thursday, July 16. Analysts expect a 58.8% rise in second-quarter net profit, per LSEG.

The revenue is now locked and public, so Thursday’s call cannot surprise on the top line. The only market-moving variable left is the outlook. 

Advertisement

Investors will watch whether management raises the full-year guide above its current 30% growth floor and whether it lifts capex again. That decision is the AI capital-spending ceiling question in another form heading into July 16.

Subscribe to our YouTube channel to watch leaders and journalists provide expert insights

The post Chipmaker Giant’s June Revenue Jumps 68% in Strongest Month of 2026 appeared first on BeInCrypto.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Crypto World

AI chips and bitcoin show how powerful structural trends can still produce severe corrections

Published

on

AI chips and bitcoin show how powerful structural trends can still produce severe corrections

The term “paradigm shift” is often applied casually to what may simply be rapid rotations between fashionable assets, the latest example being the AI-driven semiconductor boom.

Hyperscalers such as Amazon (AMZ) and Google (GOOG) are spending heavily on data centres containing thousands of AI accelerators. These systems require enormous quantities of high-bandwidth memory for processing and NAND flash for storage, tightening supply and lifting chip prices.

Micron Technology (MU) produces DRAM, NAND and other memory products, while Sandisk (SNDK) specialises in NAND flash and solid-state storage. Micron rose roughly 700% year over year, and Sandisk gained more than 4,000%. Both have subsequently retreated from their peaks, illustrating how quickly enthusiasm can reverse.

The excitement created the largest U.S. IPO of all-time in SpaceX (SPCX), while SK Hynix (00060), a leading supplier of high-bandwidth memory, raised $26.5 billion through the largest-ever U.S. listing by a foreign company. Its ADRs initially surged, but subsequent volatility exposed the risks of buying into peak optimism with SK Hynix down 15% during Asia market hours.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Crypto World

Ripple almost shut down: XRP giveaway plan explained

Published

on

Ripple architect says XRPL can go underground if states attack

Speaking at the University of Kansas School of Business this week, Ripple chief executive Brad Garlinghouse told a story the company kept to itself for more than five years. 

Summary

  • Ripple seriously considered shutting down after the SEC lawsuit and distributing its XRP holdings to shareholders.
  • The abandoned plan clarifies the separation between Ripple the company and XRP the token.
  • Ripple’s decision to fight cost roughly 150 million dollars in legal fees but produced a precedent the broader industry now uses.
  • The counterfactual giveaway would have removed Ripple’s XRP overhang but also stripped the token of Ripple’s institutional growth story.
  • The confession reframes XRP’s current thesis as an entanglement between company success, token supply, legal precedent, and ledger adoption.

In December 2020, days after the Securities and Exchange Commission sued Ripple and named Garlinghouse and co-founder Chris Larsen personally, the two men seriously weighed a plan to end the fight before it began: wind the company down, distribute Ripple’s enormous XRP holdings to shareholders on a pro rata basis, and inform the regulator that the entity it was suing no longer existed and no longer held the asset in question. In Garlinghouse’s words, the government had infinite power and resources, and shutting down was the easier path. What tipped the decision the other way was not confidence in winning. It was that dissolution would have put hundreds of employees out of work.

The disclosure landed with corroboration and a correction. David Schwartz, Ripple’s longtime chief technology officer, said outside lawyers advised leadership in that period that the company was done, unsavable, and that the executives should cut a deal to save themselves, and he argued the SEC named Garlinghouse and Larsen personally as a calculated pressure tactic, since suing two men concentrates the incentive to fold in a way that suing a corporation does not. When outlets amplified the story into capitulation headlines, Schwartz pushed back, saying his earlier comments were being stretched and that he never claimed the shutdown was on the verge of happening. Garlinghouse, for his part, attached a number to the road actually taken: roughly 150 million dollars in legal fees over four years, disclosed publicly for the first time.

Advertisement

A confession this old is not news about the past. It is a lens on the present, because the plan Ripple shelved in December 2020 is a nearly perfect thought experiment about what XRP is. Every question that hangs over the token in 2026, whether it is a claim on Ripple’s success, what the company’s supply overhang means, and why the price ignores the company’s triumphs, gets sharper when run through the world where the giveaway happened. This feature takes the confession seriously as history, then uses it as the analytical instrument it accidentally is.

December 2020: the decision as it actually looked

The context deserves reconstruction, because hindsight has sanded off how bleak it was. Three days before Christmas 2020, the SEC filed suit alleging Ripple had conducted a seven-year unregistered securities offering by selling XRP, raising more than 1.3 billion dollars, and it charged Garlinghouse and Larsen individually for their own sales. The complaint did not merely threaten a fine. It asserted that the company’s core asset, held by the billions on its balance sheet, was itself the violation. Exchanges reacted immediately: major US venues delisted or suspended XRP within weeks, liquidity fled, and the token, then comfortably in the market’s top five, lost most of its value while the rest of crypto rallied into the 2021 bull market.

Garlinghouse also supplied a detail that explains the depth of the grievance. He met SEC officials four times between 2017 and 2019, without a lawyer, and was never told the agency might treat XRP as a security. Whatever one makes of the legal merits, the company’s leadership experienced the suit as a rule invented retroactively, which shaped its willingness to litigate a case its own counsel called unwinnable.

Advertisement

Against that backdrop, the dissolution plan was not madness. It was the advice. Distribute the XRP, dissolve the entity, moot the case. The government cannot enjoin a company that does not exist, and the personal claims against two wealthy defendants would have become vastly easier to settle without an operating business generating fresh alleged violations every quarter. The plan failed the only test the founders applied to it, the employees, and Ripple chose instead to spend 150 million dollars proving the agency wrong.

The outcome vindicated the choice, though less cleanly than the folklore suggests. In July 2023, Judge Analisa Torres ruled that XRP is not in itself a security and that Ripple’s programmatic sales on public exchanges were not securities transactions, the industry’s most important judicial win of the enforcement era. But she also found that direct institutional sales violated securities law, and the final judgment carried a 125 million dollar civil penalty plus a permanent injunction against repeating unregistered institutional sales. A 2025 attempt by both sides to soften the outcome, cutting the penalty to 50 million and dissolving the injunction, was rejected by Torres because final judgment had already been entered, and the appeals were dropped, with the Second Circuit closing the case on August 22, 2025. Ripple won the war and still pays the reparations, a nuance the company’s celebratory framing tends to omit, as crypto.news noted in its review of how the case actually ended.

The alternate history: what the giveaway world would have looked like

Now run the counterfactual, because it is unusually clean. Suppose the founders had taken the lawyers’ advice in December 2020.

XRP does not die in that world. The XRP Ledger was already decentralized in the sense that mattered operationally: independent validators, open-source software, no ability for Ripple to halt or reverse it. The token would have kept trading, and the SEC’s case would have collapsed into personal claims against two defendants with every incentive to settle quickly. Ironically, the giveaway might have produced the regulatory clarity holders craved years earlier, because a token with no sponsoring company selling it is a far weaker securities case, the exact logic that later animated the Torres distinction between institutional sales and blind exchange transactions.

Advertisement

What XRP loses in that world is everything the 2026 bull case is made of. No Ripple means no On-Demand Liquidity corridors, no RLUSD stablecoin, no 1.25 billion dollar Hidden Road acquisition placing Ripple Prime inside the DTCC ecosystem, no 75-license regulatory portfolio, no MiCA authorization opening 30 European countries, a build-out crypto.news chronicled as it completed this month. It also means no concentrated lobbying force: Ripple’s 25 million dollar contribution to the industry’s political machine helped produce the legislative environment the CLARITY Act now moves through. The token would have become something like a payments-flavored Litecoin, a functioning ledger with a distributed supply, a passionate community, and no institutional narrative whatsoever.

And here is the uncomfortable part of the exercise: it is not obvious the price would be lower. The giveaway would have distributed roughly half the total supply, the escrowed billions, to shareholders in a single event, ugly in the short run but terminal for the overhang that has shadowed the market ever since. No monthly escrow releases. No company treasury whose sales the market prices in perpetually. No ambiguity about whether buying the token is buying exposure to the company. The 2026 market puts XRP near 1.09 dollars while Ripple has its most productive year in history, and the leading explanation for that disconnect is precisely that the token is not a claim on the company that owns it. The counterfactual world would have made that separation formal in 2020 and repriced it once, instead of rediscovering it every cycle.

The pressure mechanics: why naming two men nearly worked

Schwartz’s claim about the SEC’s strategy deserves unpacking, because it explains why the shutdown option got as far as a serious boardroom conversation.

Advertisement

Enforcement actions against corporations are wars of attrition that companies can rationally fight; legal fees are an operating expense, and the entity’s decision-makers are spending shareholder money on shareholder problems. Naming executives personally changes the arithmetic entirely. Garlinghouse and Larsen faced individual claims over their own XRP sales, meaning their personal fortunes, their futures in regulated finance, and their exposure to individual judgments were on the table alongside the company’s. The standard playbook response, the one the lawyers recommended, is for the individuals to settle personally and let the company negotiate from weakness. Schwartz’s reading is that the agency structured the complaint to trigger exactly that sequence: pressure the men, collapse the defense, collect the precedent.

The dissolution plan was, in a strange way, the most aggressive possible counter to that playbook. Rather than settling to protect themselves, the founders considered removing the corporate target entirely while keeping their personal defenses intact, a move that would have converted the SEC’s leverage into a stranded lawsuit against two individuals over a token no company sponsored. That they got as far as pricing the option before rejecting it on employment grounds says something rarely visible from outside: the decision to fight was not a legal calculation, and it was made against legal advice. Companies write press releases about conviction. The confession describes something closer to a coin flip weighted by payroll, which is both less heroic and considerably more believable.

The four-year fight that followed set the template the rest of the industry ran. Coinbase’s litigation posture against the same agency, down to the discovery offensives and the public refusal to settle, was Ripple’s playbook executed with a bigger balance sheet, and the enforcement retreat of 2025 that freed both companies traces directly to the precedent risk Ripple’s partial win created. The 150 million dollars bought more than one company’s survival. It bought the industry’s proof of concept that the agency could lose.

The Japan control group: the one place the counterfactual ran forward

There is a live experiment that approximates the world where XRP thrives on utility with minimal dependence on American legal outcomes, and it has been running for years in Japan.

Advertisement

Through the SBI partnership, Japan built what no other market has: production remittance corridors settling in XRP, bank-facing infrastructure, retail brokerage distribution, and now the first trust-type yen stablecoin alongside a formal RLUSD launch, an integration deep enough that crypto.news called Japan the only country actually using XRP. Japanese demand persisted through the SEC years precisely because it never depended on the SEC; the token’s status there was settled by local regulation long before Torres ruled. Korea shows a paler version of the same pattern, with XRP consistently ranking as the second most traded asset on Upbit.

The Japan case matters to the counterfactual because it shows what the giveaway world’s ceiling might have looked like: a token that works, in specific corridors, where local institutions committed, with a price driven by usage and regional retail rather than by a global institutional narrative. That ceiling is real and unimpressive relative to the 2026 thesis. XRP’s claim on a repricing runs through ETFs, CFTC classification, DTCC-adjacent infrastructure, and European licensing, all of which required a living, litigating, license-collecting Ripple. The confession, in other words, describes the fork between a token that would have merely survived and a token that might matter. The market’s frustration is that five years after the fork, the price cannot yet tell the difference.

What the confession explains about the token today

Read as an analytical instrument, the shelved plan clarifies four things that XRP holders argue about constantly.

First, it is the cleanest statement ever made of the company-token separation. The founders’ plan treated Ripple’s XRP as a distributable asset, like cash on a balance sheet, not as equity in the enterprise. That is the correct frame, and it cuts both ways. Holders do not own Ripple’s payments revenue, its licenses, or its prime brokerage; they own units of the asset Ripple also happens to hold in size. Every cycle, the market relearns this by watching company milestones fail to move the price. The confession shows the founders understood the separation so completely that they were prepared to monetize it as an exit.

Advertisement

Second, it reframes the supply overhang as a choice that keeps being made. Ripple could have distributed its holdings in 2020. It can, in principle, distribute or burn them today. Instead it maintains the escrow system, releasing up to a billion tokens monthly and relocking most, preserving the treasury as the company’s war chest. The comparison to Strategy’s Bitcoin position, which Garlinghouse himself invited when he attacked Michael Saylor’s model, runs deeper than either CEO admits, a parallel crypto.news explored: both firms sit atop token treasuries whose value depends on markets they simultaneously supply. The difference is that Ripple’s treasury predates its products, which means the company’s incentives and its holders’ interests align only where ledger usage is concerned, and the confession is a reminder that leadership has always known where the exit is.

Third, it explains the community’s political intensity. The XRP holder base is famous for treating regulatory fights as existential, and the confession validates the instinct: the fight was existential, the company nearly chose not to have it, and the entire institutional arc since, the ETFs with their 1.49 billion dollars in inflows, the bank pilots, the ledger’s climb toward institutional credit through the lending amendment now gathering validator support that crypto.news is tracking, exists because two founders decided a payroll mattered more than legal advice. Communities remember near-death experiences. This one now has the CEO’s own account of how near it was.

Fourth, it quietly indicts the enforcement-first era better than any lobbying campaign. A regulator’s lawsuit, built on a theory a judge later rejected at its core, came within one boardroom conversation of dissolving an American company, erasing hundreds of jobs, and, by the mechanics described above, possibly leaving the token itself legally cleaner than litigation ever made it. Whatever the CLARITY Act’s fate in the coming three weeks, Garlinghouse’s story is the case study its advocates will cite for a decade: rules invented by enforcement nearly produced an outcome no rule intended.

Advertisement

Why tell the story now: the timing of a five-year-old secret

Executives do not disclose near-death experiences by accident, and the timing of this one rewards a cynical read alongside the charitable one.

The charitable read is simple: the war is over, the appeals closed in August 2025, and a business school audience is exactly where a founder processes the hardest decision of his career into a leadership lesson. Nothing about the venue or the content suggests coordination, and the Schwartz back-and-forth, with the former CTO correcting the most breathless headlines within a day, has the messy texture of an unplanned story escaping its container.

The cynical read notices what the story does for Ripple’s current agenda. The company is spending this exact month arguing, through its lobbying network and the broader industry coalition, that the CLARITY Act must pass before the August recess because enforcement-era ambiguity nearly destroyed legitimate American companies. A first-person account from a sitting CEO, with a dollar figure attached, of how close ambiguity came to dissolving a firm the courts later largely vindicated is the single most persuasive artifact that argument could ask for, and it surfaced three weeks before the decisive Senate window. Whether or not the timing was designed, the story will be used, and Garlinghouse, among the most message-disciplined executives in crypto, understands precisely what he put into circulation and when.

The 150 million dollar figure itself does double duty. As a grievance, it quantifies the cost of regulation by lawsuit. As a signal, it prices the moat: that is what it cost to buy the Torres precedent, the four-year head start on institutional relationships, and the standing to pursue a bank charter while competitors were still negotiating consent orders. Ripple can afford to publicize the number because the number is, in the company’s framing, an investment that paid. The firms that settled early saved the fees and inherited none of the case law. Litigation as capital expenditure is a strange category, and Ripple’s disclosure this week is the closest thing to an audited return the industry has seen.

Advertisement

There is also an audience inside the company’s own cap table. Ripple has intermittently explored a public listing, and a founder narrating the darkest moment as a story of conviction, payroll loyalty, and vindication is writing the first chapter of an eventual prospectus narrative, one where the 2.3 billion dollar question of what the company is worth gets answered by public markets that will, inevitably, price the XRP treasury and the operating business as separable things. The confession pre-frames that separation on management’s terms: the treasury as an asset the founders could have distributed and chose to steward instead. Whenever the listing conversation becomes real, this week’s story is the one bankers will quote.

The symbolism budget: from near-dissolution to a Jayhawks jersey

The venue of the confession supplied its own punchline. Days before Garlinghouse spoke at Kansas, his alma mater’s athletic program unveiled a five-year sponsorship making XRP the first cryptocurrency ever stitched onto the jerseys of a major college team. The company that considered making its token an orphan in 2020 now pays to embroider it on the Jayhawks.

The jersey is trivial; the trajectory is not. Ripple in 2026 is chasing a national bank charter and direct access to Federal Reserve payment rails, running regulated payments across Europe, and operating inside the clearing infrastructure of American equities. It is, deliberately and expensively, becoming part of the financial system that tried to end it. That is the strategic meaning of the 150 million dollar figure Garlinghouse disclosed: the fee was not just for survival, it purchased the standing to build all of this under a favorable precedent. Companies that settle do not get to write the case law their industry relies on. Torres’ programmatic-sales ruling is cited in every token classification argument in America, and it exists because Ripple paid to litigate a question everyone else settled around.

How the market metabolized the confession

The price action around the disclosure was its own small case study in what moves this token and what does not.

Advertisement

XRP traded near 1.09 dollars through the news cycle, down about 1.4 percent on the day, statistically indistinguishable from the broader tape. A story that would have cratered the market in 2021, the CEO admitting the company nearly dissolved, produced no measurable panic, and the pockets of social media alarm that did flare were extinguished within hours by Schwartz’s clarification. On-chain, the week showed the opposite of fear: Binance spot flows on July 7 ran 64.9 million XRP in against 49.2 million out, a net buying imbalance of roughly 15.7 million tokens, and a bullish divergence formed above the 1 dollar level even as the headlines circulated. The holder base heard the founders once considered abandoning the token, and bought.

Two explanations fit, and both are probably operating. The first is maturity: after a settled lawsuit, launched ETFs, and a completed appeals process, the 2020 decision is archaeology, priced at zero because it resolved years ago. The second is more interesting and connects to everything above: the market may have understood, faster than commentators did, that the confession was bullish framing. A treasury the founders considered distributing and instead spent five years and 150 million dollars defending is a treasury management believes in. The asset the company almost orphaned is the asset it now stitches onto jerseys, builds credit markets around, and carries toward a bank charter. Revealed preference, over five years and against legal advice, is a stronger signal than any roadmap, and revealed preference is exactly what the story documents.

The remaining question is the one the counterfactual sharpens rather than answers: having kept the treasury, the company, and the token bound together, Ripple owns the burden of making the binding pay. Ledger usage, RLUSD settlement flows, corridor volume, and the classification the CLARITY Act would confer are the mechanisms that would finally route company success into token demand. The confession proves nothing about whether they will. It does settle the older argument about intent. The founders looked at a world where XRP floated free of Ripple, priced it against a payroll, and chose the harder, entangled path. Five years and 150 million dollars later, the entanglement is the investment thesis, the escrow is the overhang, the precedent is the moat, and the token that was almost given away trades at a dollar while the company that almost gave it away has never been stronger. Alternate histories do not pay dividends, but this one earns its keep: it is the rare counterfactual that explains the actual world better than the actual world explains itself.

Disclosure: This article does not represent investment advice. The content and materials featured on this page are for educational purposes only.

Advertisement

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Crypto World

PI and APX Crater by Double Digits, BTC Price Dipped Below $63K: Market Watch

Published

on

After a relatively quiet weekend, bitcoin’s price dipped by nearly two grand on Monday morning as the market priced in the new attacks in the Middle East.

Most larger-cap alts have followed suit with similar daily losses, with XRP dropping below the crucial $1.10 support, and ETH failing at $1,800.

BTC Slipped Below $63K

Bitcoin reacted well to the July 1 dip below $58,000 and quickly reclaimed the $60,000 line. It kept climbing in the following days and jumped to $64,000 on July 6. However, Strategy’s latest and biggest sale resulted in a major leg down, as BTC slumped to $61,200 in hours.

Unlike the previous such occasion, though, the cryptocurrency rebounded swiftly after the initial FUD and jumped to $64,400 on Tuesday. Another rejection followed after the US and Iran broke their ceasefire and launched new rockets against each other.

Advertisement

This time, BTC was able to halt the free-fall at $61,600 and went on a minor rally at the end of the week. The culmination came on Saturday morning with a surge to $64,600, which became a new multi-week peak. BTC stood at around $64,000 for most of the weekend, but dipped earlier today to $62,400 as the consequences of the latest set of attacks between the US and Iran were felt across all markets.

It has rebounded to just over $63,000 as of now, but its market cap has dropped to $1.265 trillion on CG. Its dominance over the alts has increased slightly to 56.7%.

BTCUSD July 13. Source: TradingView
BTCUSD July 13. Source: TradingView

PI, APX Dump Hard

Pi Network’s native token doesn’t seem to be able to catch a break these days, marking consecutive all-time lows. The latest came hours ago with a nosedive to $0.086, solidifying its major correction as the asset is down by over 97% since its ATH marked last year.

APX is the other big loser today, dropping by over 25%. In contrast, BEAT has gained 20% while DEXE has doubled down on its major rally as of late.

ETH failed at $1,800, BNB is back to $570, while XRP dipped to a multi-day low at $1.07 before it rebounded slightly. HYPE, RAIN, DOGE, ZEC, and XLM are also slightly in the red, while SOL and XMR are with insignificant gains.

Advertisement

The total crypto market cap has shed over $20 billion in the past 24 hours and is now below $2.240 trillion on CG.

Cryptocurrency Market Overview July 13. Source: QuantifyCrypto
Cryptocurrency Market Overview July 13. Source: QuantifyCrypto

The post PI and APX Crater by Double Digits, BTC Price Dipped Below $63K: Market Watch appeared first on CryptoPotato.

Source link

Continue Reading

Crypto World

Lawson Tests Yen Stablecoin Payments as Netstars Opens Merchant Service

Published

on

Lawson Tests Yen Stablecoin Payments as Netstars Opens Merchant Service

Japanese convenience-store operator Lawson plans to test yen-denominated stablecoin payments at a Tokyo location in August, examining whether stablecoin payments can work inside a standard convenience store checkout flow.

On Monday, blockchain company HashPort said it had signed an agreement with Lawson and telecom group KDDI to conduct the trial at the Lawson Takanawa Gateway City store. Participants will use HashPort’s non-custodial wallet, while the store will process payments through the company’s point-of-sale system without needing to open or manage crypto wallets. 

The pilot aims to explore how stablecoin payments can be integrated into Japan’s existing retail infrastructure while shielding merchants from much of the operational complexity associated with accepting digital assets.

The companies plan to assess integration requirements, checkout operations, payment processing times and wallet usability before considering broader applications.

Advertisement

Netstars launches multi-stablecoin merchant service

Separately, Japanese payments company Netstars launched Stablecoin Pay on Monday, opening applications from merchants seeking to accept multiple stablecoins as payment options. 

The service initially supports USDC, USDT and the yen-denominated JPYC through the Solana and Polygon networks, with MetaMask as the supported wallet. Netstars set the merchant payment fee at 0.98% and said it plans to add more wallets and blockchains. 

With the service, merchants can use existing payment terminals in most cases and handle product pricing, sales records and settlement in yen, even when customers pay with dollar-denominated stablecoins. Netstars said this removes the need to hold crypto or manage exchange rates.

The commercial launch follows Netstars trials involving USDC payments at Tokyo’s Haneda Airport from January to February and at a trading-card store in Himeji from April.

Advertisement

Related: Japanese lender launches Bitcoin-backed loans of up to $6.2M

The move from limited pilots to a merchant-facing service comes as Japanese companies build more consumer-facing products around the country’s regulated stablecoin market. On June 1, 2023, Japan introduced a dedicated framework for stablecoins when amendments to the Payment Services Act and related laws took effect. 

The rules created regulatory categories for fiat-linked stablecoins and require businesses acting as intermediaries to register with the Financial Services Agency.

The framework was followed by regulatory approval for USDC distribution in March 2025 and by JPYC’s registration as a fund transfer service provider that August, before the stablecoin was launched in October

Advertisement

Magazine: Has Bitcoin bottomed for this cycle? Analysts say ‘not yet’

Source link

Continue Reading

Crypto World

USD/CAD: One Trendline Away From Deciding the Next Move

Published

on

USD/CAD: One Trendline Away From Deciding the Next Move

After several strongly positive weeks, USD/CAD has stalled over the past few sessions, entering a phase of uncertainty.

On the dollar side, Fed Chair Kevin Warsh has struck a firm tone, reaffirming the 2% inflation target and pushing back against political pressure to cut rates, while sticky PCE inflation near 4% keeps hike odds alive for September. Yet June payrolls came in softer and speculative USD positioning looks stretched, raising doubts on how much further the rally can extend. Markets will also watch upcoming US CPI and PPI releases closely, as either gauge could reinforce the Fed hike case or, if softer, cap dollar strength.

The loonie’s story is similarly mixed. Canada’s June jobs report beat expectations, reducing the odds of a BoC cut, yet the currency remains capped by falling oil prices, subdued inflation, and unresolved CUSMA trade uncertainty. Two currencies face both genuine support and headwinds, leaving USD/CAD hostage to this week’s BoC decision and incoming US data—a backdrop that aligns well with what the chart itself is showing.

USD/CAD Technical analysis

Advertisement

As the 4H chart shows, USD/CAD has traded within a well-defined ascending channel since May’s lows, and is now consolidating just below recent swing highs. The Fibonacci retracement drawn from that low to the July high offers a useful reference for the levels ahead.

Bullish Scenario

As long as price holds above the ascending trendline and defends the former resistance, now turned support, in the 1.4100 area, the broader uptrend structure remains firmly intact, and this pause looks far more like healthy consolidation than an early reversal signal. A confirmed bounce off the trendline, followed by a decisive push back above the recent swing high near the 1.4250 area, would validate continued bullish control and open the way for USD/CAD to extend its rally into fresh highs for the move, keeping the dollar’s medium-term strength against the loonie firmly in place.

Bearish Scenario

A clean, sustained break below the ascending trendline would mark the first real technical warning sign, shifting near-term momentum decisively lower. In that case, the 0.382 and 0.5 Fibonacci retracement levels would become the first meaningful support tests, coinciding with the psychological 1.3900-1.4000 range. Losing these levels could expose a deeper slide towards the 0.618 retracement—an area that would confirm a genuine correction of the entire May-to-July rally rather than a simple pullback, and would put the pair’s medium-term bullish structure into serious question.

Advertisement

With price sitting right on the ascending trendline, the coming sessions could prove decisive in determining where USD/CAD heads next.

Trade over 50 forex markets 24 hours a day with FXOpen. Take advantage of low commissions, deep liquidity, and spreads from 0.0 pips (additional fees may apply). Open your FXOpen account now or learn more about trading forex with FXOpen.

This article represents the opinion of the Companies operating under the FXOpen brand only. It is not to be construed as an offer, solicitation, or recommendation with respect to products and services provided by the Companies operating under the FXOpen brand, nor is it to be considered financial advice.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Crypto World

Thailand Central Bank Starts Auditing USDT as Gray-Market Crackdown Grows

Published

on

Crypto Breaking News

Thailand’s central bank is intensifying oversight of stablecoin activity, aiming to reduce the use of digital assets in money laundering, illicit finance, and cash-linked “gray money.” The Bank of Thailand said it is working alongside the country’s Securities and Exchange Commission to audit high-volume stablecoin transfers, with a particular focus on USDT (USDT), cash movements, and currency exchange flows.

The effort is part of a broader anti-financial-crime push that targets suspicious funds that may originate from scams and other criminal operations. Bank of Thailand Governor Vitai Ratanakorn told local media outlet The Nation that the changes are not meant to be a quick fix, but rather a continuous program requiring multiple parallel approaches.

Key takeaways

  • The Bank of Thailand and the SEC will audit high-volume stablecoin transactions, prioritizing USDT-related activity alongside cash and foreign exchange behavior.
  • New compliance expectations will extend beyond crypto—covering cash networks, currency exchanges, and gold bullion trading—where suspicious patterns may be linked to illicit flows.
  • Thailand plans tighter reporting rules for large cash transactions, including source-of-funds declarations and scrutiny of suspicious banknote exchanges.
  • Regulators are also seeking to address “gray money,” a category closely associated in the reporting with scam-linked proceeds.
  • The crackdown arrives after prior steps that reportedly affected a wider set of bank customers than intended, highlighting execution risks.

Why the stablecoin spotlight is widening

Stablecoins have become a common bridge for moving value quickly across borders, and Thai authorities are now treating that speed as a potential vulnerability when paired with illicit funding sources. According to the report, the central bank’s focus includes high-volume stablecoin transactions and the routes they may connect to—including exchanges between cash and different currencies.

Thailand is also emphasizing “gray economy” activity. While the article notes there are no reliable figures for the size of the gray economy, it cites a reported $3.4 billion in 2025 scam losses alongside 173 million scam calls and texts. Against that backdrop, regulators appear to be building out monitoring capabilities designed to detect suspicious transaction structures rather than relying solely on post-incident enforcement.

What regulators plan to monitor in practice

In addition to stablecoin transfers, the proposed surveillance program is described as expanding commercial bank compliance responsibilities across several channels. These include cash networks, currency exchanges, and gold bullion trading, alongside “suspicious stablecoin transactions.” The objective, as presented in the reporting, is to reduce the likelihood that regulated intermediaries help facilitate corruption or shadow-economy behavior.

Advertisement

The measures also include reporting requirements for cash activity. For example, the article says high-value cash transactions will require a source-of-funds declaration. It also notes that exchanging large volumes of big banknotes for smaller denominations without a clear business purpose will be monitored, suggesting authorities want to identify patterns consistent with laundering workflows.

The report further states that cash deposits above 5 million baht (about $150,000) will require full disclosure. For market participants, that signals a compliance posture that treats large cash movements as higher-risk, even when those funds never touch an on-chain wallet—an important point for Thai businesses operating between traditional finance and crypto-linked payment rails.

Crypto rules remain layered: legal trading, tighter stablecoin scrutiny

Thailand is often portrayed as relatively open to digital assets, but the central bank’s stance on payment uses remains restrictive. The article reiterates that stablecoin and digital asset payments are outlawed by the central bank, while crypto trading remains legal in the country. That creates a policy tension: while trading is permitted, authorities are still trying to prevent certain transaction uses that can support illicit behavior.

According to the report, Thailand’s largest exchange, Bitkub, handles roughly $26 million in daily volume. CoinGecko data cited in the article indicates that nearly 40% of that activity is tied to forex, with the USDT/THB pair noted as the most popular. This matters because stablecoins can function as a practical liquidity tool for currency-related trading—meaning monitoring efforts could intersect with everyday market operations even if the underlying business is legitimate.

Advertisement

Thailand’s regulatory tightening has not been a one-off. The article points to ongoing rule changes around crypto funding and compliance expectations for crypto businesses, suggesting the stablecoin surveillance push is part of a longer shift toward stronger enforcement rather than a sudden reversal.

Past enforcement backlash is shaping the risk calculus

The stablecoin monitoring initiative comes after a broader banking crackdown on suspicious accounts. The article says Thai banks restricted or froze accounts in 2025 as part of efforts to target mule accounts, gray capital, and other forms of suspicious activity, with reporting that three million bank accounts were frozen.

However, the same reporting notes that thousands of individuals and legitimate businesses were reportedly caught in the dragnet. Local coverage described the earlier campaign as a “scammer crackdown gone wrong,” indicating that the challenge for regulators is not only identifying illicit activity, but doing so without overreach that harms lawful users.

That context is important for investors and businesses because it raises the question of how authorities will balance enforcement intensity with precision. When surveillance expands across cash, forex, and stablecoin rails, false positives can become a recurring operational risk—particularly for firms and customers that frequently move between cash and digital currency due to normal commercial activity.

Advertisement

Thailand’s next signals will likely come from how the audit process is implemented in practice—especially whether regulators publish clearer thresholds, how they define “suspicious” stablecoin transactions, and what remedies are available when compliance actions mistakenly affect legitimate customers. For market participants, the key watch item is how USDT-related flows, cash reporting requirements, and banking compliance obligations converge during enforcement and audits.

Risk & affiliate notice: Crypto assets are volatile and capital is at risk. This article may contain affiliate links. Read full disclosure

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Crypto World

U.S. CPI, JPMorgan, Citi earnings reports: Crypto Week Ahead

Published

on

U.S. CPI, JPMorgan, Citi earnings reports: Crypto Week Ahead

U.S. inflation data and financial-sector earnings are set to steer crypto markets in the week ahead, with investors looking for fresh signals on interest rates, economic growth and risk appetite.

June’s consumer price index lands Tuesday, followed by producer prices on Wednesday, giving markets two opportunities to consider the Federal Reserve’s interest-rate policy path.

Markus Levin, co-founder of XYO, told CoinDesk that softer CPI and PPI readings could strengthen the case for easier monetary policy, which has historically supported bitcoin and the broader crypto market. A stronger-than-expected inflation print, however, could push out rate-cut expectations and potentially send bitcoin below $60,000, he said.

“Investors will also be watching earnings from major U.S. banks, including JPMorgan, Citigroup and Wells Fargo, as their results often provide one of the clearest snapshots of the health of the U.S. economy,” Levin said.

Advertisement

”Strong loan demand, healthy consumer spending and stable credit quality would reinforce the view that economic growth remains resilient, supporting broader risk appetite.”

Renewed U.S.-Iran tensions and the risk of disruption around the Strait of Hormuz are also likely to influence events, injecting further volatility through oil prices and other risk markets.

What to Watch

(All times ET)

  • Crypto
    • July 13: Ethereum developers to review progress on testing the planned Glamsterdam upgrade.
    • July 14: Jito’s expected to make self-custody Solana trading app, JTX, accessible for early users.
  • Macro
    • July 14, 08:30 a.m.: U.S. Core Inflation Rate MoM for June est. 0.2% (Prev. 0.3%)
    • July 14, 08:30 a.m.: U.S. Core Consumer Price Index YoY for June est. 2.9% (Prev. 2.9%); MoM est. 0.3% (Prev. 0.2%)
    • July 14, 08:30 a.m.: U.S. Consumer Price Index YoY for June (Prev. 4.2%); MoM est. -0.1% (Prev. 0.5%)
    • July 14, 10 a.m.: U.S. Fed Chair Warsh presents semiannual monetary policy report to Congress.
    • July 14, 10 p.m.: China GDP Growth Rate YoY for Q2 est. 4.4% (Prev. 5%)
    • July 15, 8:45 a.m.: U.S. Fed Williams speech titled “The Future of Market Liquidity and Functioning”
    • July 15, 9:45 a.m.: Bank of Canada Interest Rate Decision (Prev. 2.25%)
    • July 16, 08:30 a.m.: U.S. Initial Jobless Claims for period ending July 11 (Prev. 215K)
    • July 17, 5 a.m.: Eurozone Consumer Price Index YoY Final for June est. 2.8% (Prev.3.2%)
    • July 17, 10 a.m.: U.S. Michigan Consumer Sentiment Prel for July (Prev. 49.5)
  • Earnings
    • July 15: BlackRock (BLK), pre-market, $12.55

Token Events

  • Governance Votes & Calls
    • Aave DAO is voting to adopt a standardized technical asset listing framework to ensure consistent, transparent safety baselines for assets across Aave V3, V4 and Horizon. Voting ends on July 13.
    • Ssv.network DAO is voting to reduce the floor price for its incentivized mainnet program (IMP) rewards from $10 to $8 per SSV. Voting ends on July 14.
    • Threshold Network DAO is voting to reorganize its committee, split multisig responsibilities, and eliminate contributor compensation to save $649,000. Voting ends July 15.
    • Cratos DAO is voting to extend the current mobile app token reward standard deadline from July 31 to Aug. 31, delaying the planned halving until Sept. 1 to help sustain user acquisition. Voting ends on July 16.
    • ENS DAO is voting to allocate $1.69 million to fund the SPP3 infrastructure cohort and compensate the selection committee. Voting ends on July 16.
    • Arbitrum DAO is voting on the election of members for the Oversight and Transparency Committee (OAT). Delegates can freely allocate their voting power among the 13 eligible candidates using a weighted voting system. Voting ends on July 17.
  • Unlocks
    • July 15: Connex (CONX) to unlock 1.45% of its circulating supply worth $28.67 million.
    • July 16: Arbitrum (ARB) to unlock 1.46% of its circulating supply worth $8.62 million.
    • July 17: DeBridge (DBR) to unlock 11.43% of its circulating supply worth $10.13 million.
  • Token Launches
    • July 13 – Credible (CRED) community sale opens on MetaDAO. The raise targets $2 million in community demand.

Conferences

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Crypto World

Gate Launches Pre-IPOs Phase 2 Featuring OpenAI (OPENAI), Offering Dual-Currency Subscriptions for a Leading AI Unicorn

Published

on

Gate Launches Pre-IPOs Phase 2 Featuring OpenAI (OPENAI), Offering Dual-Currency Subscriptions for a Leading AI Unicorn

Gate, one of the leading global digital asset trading platforms, today announced the launch of Pre-IPOs Phase 2, featuring OpenAI (OPENAI). Opening for subscription on July 15, the offering supports subscriptions in both USDT and GUSD, allowing users to get in early on one of the world’s leading AI unicorns before its potential public listing while enjoying multiple subscription rewards, including GT Sunshine Airdrop rewards and GUSD Minting returns.

Gate Pre-IPOs is the platform’s digital subscription mechanism designed to provide users with more convenient and diversified access to pre-listing investment opportunities in high-quality companies. The OpenAI (OPENAI) subscription will run from July 15, 2026, 07:00 to July 17, 2026, 07:00 (UTC). The offering has a total subscription value of approximately $20 million, with 27,700 OPENAI Asset Certificates available at a commitment price of $722 per OPENAI. The minimum subscription amount is 100 USDT or 100 GUSD per order, and this subscription waives both the implied trading fee and custody fee.

OpenAI is one of the world’s most influential artificial intelligence companies, driving the rapid advancement of generative AI through products such as ChatGPT while continuing to attract significant attention from global capital markets. Having received continued investment from leading technology companies including Microsoft, OpenAI currently carries an implied valuation of approximately $895 billion and is widely regarded as one of the defining AI unicorns of this generation.

OPENAI Asset Certificates are Mirror Notes issued before OpenAI’s IPO, designed to reflect the company’s market value before and after its public listing. Structured as Contingent Payout Notes (CPNs), they provide users with exposure to OpenAI’s pre-IPO valuation. By obtaining hedging exposure to OpenAI shares in the market, Gate provides users with multiple exit options or long-term holding methods aligned with the target company’s fair market value.

Advertisement

Gate Pre-IPOs uses users’ hourly average locked amount as the basis for allocation. The earlier users subscribe and the longer they maintain their subscription, the higher their allocation weight. Following the subscription period, OPENAI Asset Certificates will be distributed across three unlock phases, with 25% unlocked on July 17, 35% on August 17, and 40% on September 17, 2026.

Following the initial distribution, OPENAI Asset Certificates will begin pre-market trading in the Gate Pre-IPOs section on July 20, 2026, 08:00 (UTC). Depending on market conditions, users may choose to buy or sell their holdings through Pre-Market trading before the underlying company completes its IPO. After the IPO and the applicable lock-up period, holders will be able to exchange their Asset Certificates for shares, tokenized stocks, or USDT based on the actual post-listing market price through Gate’s dedicated redemption portal.

To celebrate the launch, Gate is introducing multiple subscription rewards. Eligible VIP users and Affiliate Ultras can participate in the OpenAI (OPENAI) Airdrop campaign. Users with successful subscriptions exceeding $10,000 will each receive 1 GT, while users with successful subscriptions below $10,000 will share a 2,000 GT Sunshine Airdrop prize pool. Users subscribing with GUSD will also enjoy a 3.8% annualized GUSD Minting return, with returns distributed automatically on a daily basis.

As digital assets continue to converge with traditional finance, Gate is steadily expanding its global investment ecosystem across pre-listing opportunities, publicly listed equities, and tokenized securities. The platform has introduced products including Pre-IPOs and IPO Access, while Gate Stocks now supports 24/7 trading across the U.S., Hong Kong, and Korean markets, covering more than 12,500 stocks and ETFs. Gate has also launched gStocks, its tokenized securities service backed 1:1 by underlying shares, creating a diversified investment ecosystem spanning pre-IPO opportunities, listed equities, and tokenized securities.

Advertisement

Looking ahead, Gate will continue expanding its global investment ecosystem by introducing more high-quality stocks, ETFs, and RWA products. By connecting primary markets, secondary markets, and tokenized assets, Gate aims to provide users with a full lifecycle investment experience covering asset discovery, investment participation, and value realization, while further accelerating the convergence of digital assets and traditional finance to build a more open, efficient, and comprehensive global investment platform.

Subscribe to OpenAI (OPENAI) here.

Learn more here.

About Gate

Gate, founded in 2013 by Dr. Han, is one of the world’s leading cryptocurrency and integrated financial services platforms. Serving over 57 million users globally, it supports trading across 4,700+ digital assets and 12,500+ stock assets, while providing access to a comprehensive range of TradFi assets, including metals, stocks, indices, forex, and commodities, delivering users a one-stop, multi-asset trading experience and blockchain-related services. As an industry benchmark, Gate was among the first platforms to implement 100% Proof of Reserves. Its ecosystem includes Gate Wallet, Gate Ventures, Gate for AI Agent, and a wide range of products and services.

Advertisement

For more information, please visit: Website | X | Telegram | LinkedIn| Instagram | YouTube

Disclaimer:

This content does not constitute an offer, solicitation, or recommendation. You should always seek independent professional advice before making investment decisions. Note that Gate may restrict or prohibit certain services in specific jurisdictions. For more information, please read the User Agreement.

The post Gate Launches Pre-IPOs Phase 2 Featuring OpenAI (OPENAI), Offering Dual-Currency Subscriptions for a Leading AI Unicorn appeared first on BeInCrypto.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Crypto World

Japan PM Takaichi backs Web3 startups with funding and rule changes

Published

on

Japan’s FSA orders moomoo Securities to halt new account openings until September

Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi renewed the government’s support for startups and Web3 during a video address at WebX 2026 in Tokyo. 

Summary

  • Takaichi linked Japan’s Web3 growth to stronger startup funding, regulatory relief and investor access nationwide.
  • The government aims to raise annual startup investment to roughly 10 trillion yen by 2027.
  • Crypto tax reform and private grants are advancing alongside Japan’s broader national startup support program.

She described the conference as a meeting place for founders, investors and companies seeking practical uses for blockchain. Organizers expect about 15,000 participants, placing the event among Asia’s largest Web3 gatherings. Takaichi said public policy and industry events could help create new business partnerships.

Takaichi presented Web3 as part of Japan’s wider innovation program rather than a separate crypto plan. She praised WebX for giving startups access to investors and allowing participants to discuss future services.

Advertisement

“The conference provides a platform to create business collaboration,” she said, according to CoinPost. 

However, the address did not announce a new Web3 fund, a dedicated grant total or immediate regulatory changes for crypto companies.

Government plans more capital and regulatory relief

The prime minister pointed to Japan’s Comprehensive Startup Support Package, which the government prepared in May 2025. The package strengthens the Five-Year Startup Development Plan adopted in 2022. 

It calls for more capital from government-backed funds and financial institutions. It also includes regulatory changes designed to help young companies grow, hire staff and reach larger markets. Takaichi did not give a timetable for each measure.

Japan’s five-year plan aims to raise annual startup investment to about 10 trillion yen by fiscal 2027. The government also wants Japan to become a leading Asian startup center. Official documents set longer-term targets of 100 unicorns and 100,000 startups. The package covers funding, founder networks and partnerships between startups and established companies, but results will depend on investment activity and the rollout of each policy measure.

Crypto reforms move alongside startup support

Japan is also revising rules for digital assets. As crypto.news reported in June, lawmakers were advancing a bill that could apply a 20% tax rate to crypto gains and create a route for domestic crypto exchange-traded funds. The planned tax treatment would place crypto closer to stocks and bonds. The changes are not yet fully in force, and the report said the tax provisions could start in 2028.

Advertisement

Private programs have added another source of support. Ripple and Web3 Salon launched grants of up to $200,000 for selected Japanese teams building on the XRP Ledger. 

The program targets payments, tokenized assets and decentralized finance projects. Web3 Salon receives support from the Japan External Trade Organization. These grants operate separately from Takaichi’s package, but they show how public agencies and private companies now work with startup founders.

Web3 support continues across administrations

Takaichi’s message followed appearances by previous prime ministers at the same conference. Fumio Kishida addressed WebX by video in 2024 and linked blockchain to social and economic policy. 

Shigeru Ishiba appeared in person in 2025 and backed investment support and rule changes for Web3 and artificial intelligence. The repeated participation gives the industry access to senior officials, though speeches do not guarantee new laws or funding.

Advertisement

Takaichi said government measures and WebX could jointly encourage people to launch new projects. “Japan’s innovation ecosystem will develop further,” she said. The statement sets a broad policy direction, but it leaves details to ministries, regulators and financial institutions. 

Japan’s next steps will include carrying out the startup package, completing crypto legislation and measuring whether new funding reaches early-stage companies and supports products used outside conference venues. Ministries and financial regulators will handle the detailed rules and funding programs.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2025