Connect with us

Entertainment

All 10 Pixar Movies of the 2020s, Ranked

Published

on

Zurg aiming his canon in Lightyear

Beginning with the premiere of Toy Story in 1995, Pixar has become one of the most beloved and recognized animation companies in the world. They quickly developed a strong identity and loyal fanbase thanks to their willingness to tell more emotionally rich and complex stories, all while pushing the capabilities of 3D animation. The studio was bought out by Disney in 2006, and while they have maintained their identity for the most part, they have also slowly shifted to fit the Mouse House’s more homogenized style.

The 2020s have been the best example of this shift in philosophies. While not every film this decade has been a complete failure, their quality is notably lower than in previous ones, partially because of their experimental nature, and partially because they lack that special magic that made older Pixar so beloved. Here, we’ll rank every Pixar movie of the 2020s, from the truly mediocre ones to those that come close to replicating their golden age throughout the 2000s.

Advertisement

10

‘Lightyear’ (2022)

Zurg aiming his canon in Lightyear Image via Pixar Animation Studios

After accidentally damaging a ship full of colonists, Buzz Lightyear (Chris Evans) volunteers to test a new hyperspace fuel recipe in the hopes of finding one that can bring them back to Star Command. Due to time dilation, every four minutes he spends in space testing the fuel results in four years passing on the planet, so he watches as his friends grow old, and the colonists settle into their new lives. Unwilling to give up the mission, he eventually jumps twenty-two years into the future, where he finds the planet under attack by robots loyal to a being called Zurg (James Brolin).

Lightyear was marketed as the in-universe film that made Andy fall in love with Buzz Lightyear, and from there it’s pretty easy to see how it became one of Pixar’s biggest box-office bombs. Not only is it a confusing way to market a film, but it trades away fun space adventures for a slow, melancholic, and predictable science fiction story that doesn’t even have Tim Allen in the iconic role. If you want to see a fun Buzz Lightyear story to serve as an origin for the character, go watch Buzz Lightyear of Star Command: The Adventure Begins.

Advertisement

9

‘Toy Story 5’ (2026)

Jessie, Bullseye, Smarty Pants, and other toys in 'Toy Story 5'
Jessie, Bullseye, Smarty Pants, and other toys in ‘Toy Story 5’
Image via Pixar Animation Studios

Despite the efforts of Jessie (Joan Cusack) and the other toys in building up their owner Bonnie’s (Scarlett Spears) confidence, she is unable to make friends until her parents get a Lilypad iPad (Greta Lee) so she can connect with other iPad kids. Jessie protests Lily’s methods, since the friends she makes for Bonnie are impersonal, but eventually ends up separated from Bonnie and sent back to the residence of her original owner, Emily. As she tries to find her way back, Woody (Tom Hanks) arrives to help Buzz (Tim Allen) confront Lily, though the two spend just as much time debating who should be Jessie’s deputy.

Toy Story 5 is yet another pointless sequel to a franchise that should have ended two films ago. The commentary on technology’s effects on kids feels five years too late, not to mention hollow, given that Pixar is, itself, a company that has always been about pushing new technologies. Aside from that, most of the legacy characters are sidelined; Woody could have been cut from the movie, and nothing would have been lost, and there is a disconnected subplot of high-tech Buzz Lightyears trying to find Star Command.

Advertisement

8

‘Elio’ (2025)

Elio trying to contact aliens
Elio trying to contact aliens
Image via Pixar Animation Studios

After the death of his parents, Elio Solís (Yonas Kibreab) is raised by his aunt, Air Force Major Olga (Zoe Saldaña), and becomes obsessed with being abducted by aliens due to his inability to fit in with other kids his age. He gets his wish when, after sending a message into space using military equipment, he is mistaken for a diplomat and brought aboard the Communiverse, a spaceship where various alien diplomats gather to share knowledge with one another. Desperate not to return to Earth, Elio volunteers to negotiate with a powerful warlord named Lord Grigon (Brad Garrett) in exchange for permanent membership, while a clone of him is sent back to his aunt, who quickly realizes something is amiss.

Elio went through a tricky production cycle that saw most of its plot re-tooled and queer themes removed. The result is an incredibly generic film that feels like Lilo & Stitch if we spent the film in space rather than on Earth, but without a unifying visual aesthetic, such as Lilo & Stitch’s use of aquatic life for the aliens. That said, it has a few redeeming qualities, such as Lord Grigon proving to be a well-constructed character with a complex and sympathetic relationship with his son, Glordon (Remy Edgerly).











Advertisement









Collider Exclusive · Sci-Fi Personality Quiz
Which Sci-Fi Hero Are You Most Like?
Paul Atreides · Captain Kirk · Princess Leia · Ellen Ripley · Max Rockatansky
Advertisement

Five iconic heroes. Five completely different ways of facing an impossible universe. One of them shares your instincts, your values, and your particular way of refusing to back down. Eight questions will tell you which one.

🏜️Paul Atreides

🖖Capt. Kirk

Princess Leia

🔦Ellen Ripley

Advertisement

🔥Max Rockatansky

Advertisement

01

How do you lead when the stakes couldn’t be higher?
The way you lead under pressure is the most honest thing about you.





Advertisement

02

What is your greatest strength in a crisis?
The quality that keeps you alive when everything else fails.





Advertisement

03

What is the thing you’d sacrifice everything else for?
Your deepest motivation is your truest compass.





Advertisement

04

How do you relate to the people around you?
Who you are to others under pressure is who you really are.





Advertisement

05

You’re facing a threat that no one else believes is real. What do you do?
How you respond when you’re the only one who sees it defines everything.





Advertisement

06

What has your heroism cost you personally?
Every hero pays. The question is what — and whether they’d pay it again.





Advertisement

07

How do you feel about the rules of the world you’re in?
Every hero has a relationship with the system. What’s yours?





Advertisement

08

When everything is on the line, what keeps you going?
The answer is the most honest thing about you.





Advertisement
Your Hero Has Been Identified
Your Sci-Fi Hero Is…

Your answers point to the iconic sci-fi hero who shares your instincts, your values, and your particular way of facing the impossible.

Advertisement


Arrakis · Dune

Paul Atreides

You carry a weight most people would crumble under — the knowledge of what you’re capable of, and the burden of what you might have to become.

  • You see further ahead than others and you plan accordingly, even when the vision frightens you.
  • You are driven by loyalty to your people and a sense of destiny you didn’t ask for but can’t escape.
  • Paul Atreides is not simply a hero — he is someone who understands the cost of power and chooses to bear it anyway.
  • That gravity, that willingness to carry what others won’t, is exactly you.

Advertisement


USS Enterprise · Star Trek

Captain Kirk

You lead with instinct, warmth, and an absolute refusal to accept a no-win scenario — because you’ve always believed there’s a third option nobody else has thought of yet.

  • You take the mission seriously without ever taking yourself too seriously.
  • Your crew would follow you anywhere, not because you demand it, but because you’ve earned it.
  • Kirk’s genius isn’t tactical — it’s human. He reads people, bends rules with purpose, and wills outcomes into existence through sheer conviction.
  • That combination of warmth, audacity, and relentless optimism is unmistakably yours.

Advertisement


The Rebellion · Star Wars

Princess Leia

You are the kind of person who holds the line when everyone else is losing faith — not because you’re fearless, but because giving up simply isn’t something you’re capable of.

  • You lead through conviction. Your voice carries because your belief is unshakeable.
  • You gave up everything ordinary the moment you chose the cause, and you’ve never looked back.
  • Leia is not a supporting character in her own story — she is the moral centre of the entire rebellion.
  • That same fierce, principled, unbreakable core is what defines you.

Advertisement


The Nostromo · Alien

Ellen Ripley

You are not reckless, not grandiose, and not particularly interested in being anyone’s hero — you just refuse to stop when it matters.

  • You see threats clearly, you document the truth even when no one listens, and when the time comes you handle it yourself.
  • Ripley’s heroism is earned, not performed. She doesn’t have a speech — she has a flamethrower and a plan.
  • You share her composure under the worst possible pressure, and her refusal to pretend the monster isn’t there.
  • When it counts, you don’t flinch. That’s everything.

Advertisement


The Wasteland · Mad Max

Max Rockatansky

You have been through fire that would break most people — and what came out the other side is something the world underestimates at its peril.

  • You don’t ask for help, don’t need validation, and don’t wait for anyone to tell you the rules no longer apply.
  • Your loyalty, when it finally arrives, is absolute — but it’s earned in silence and tested in action, not in words.
  • Max is not a nihilist. He is someone who lost everything and found, against his will, that he still has something worth protecting.
  • That bruised, stubborn, ultimately human core is exactly yours.
Advertisement

7

‘Hoppers’ (2026)

A beaver looking up in Hoppers Image via Pixar Animation Studios
Advertisement

Mabel Tanaka (Piper Cura) is a college-age environmentalist who is failing her classes and enduring bodily harm to save her deceased grandmother’s (Karen Huie) favourite glade from being destroyed by Mayor Jerry Generazzo (Jon Hamm). In her quest to find a beaver to bring back to the glade to restore the local ecosystem, she discovers that her biology professor, Dr. Sam Fairfax (Kathy Najimy), has invented hopping technology, allowing humans to upload their consciousness into robot animals to better understand the animal world. Ignoring Dr. Sam’s warnings, Maple steals the beaver robot and meets another beaver named George (Bobby Moynihan), the Mammal King, whom she tries to encourage to help her save the glade.

Hoppers is another recent Pixar film that suffers from a generic art style, story, and characters. Nothing is offensively bad about it, and it does get a few laughs here and there, but when the film is making self-aware jokes that compare it to Avatar, that’s a clear sign that it’s going to be a derivative experience. It also doesn’t help that Swapped, released the same year, has a more creative take on animal body swapping with vastly more interesting creature designs, while 2024’s The Wild Robot presents a much more compelling narrative that keeps the natural world feeling plausible and grounded, rather than highly anthropomorphized.

6

‘Turning Red’ (2022)

Mei walking happily in Turning Red 2022
Mei in Turning Red 2022
Image via Pixar Animation Studios
Advertisement

Meilin Lee (Rosalie Chiang) is a Chinese-Canadian girl who tends to her family shrine and works to please her strict mother, Ming (Sandra Oh), while also hanging with her friends and fangirling over the boyband 4*Town. One day, after being humiliated by Ming the previous day, Mei wakes up to discover that she has turned into a giant red panda, a curse that’s passed down through her mother’s side. As Ming makes preparations for a ceremony that will seal Mei’s panda in a talisman, Mei and her friends realize they can use it to raise money to go to a 4*Town concert.

Turning Red is one of numerous films that were hit hard by COVID, but in terms of its overall quality, it’s a mixed bag. The animation is full of visual gags and exaggerated faces, and there is a decent story about generational trauma. On the other hand, the comedy and the characters can be rather hit-or-miss, and the climax involves a kaiju-sized red panda and twerking as a strategy to defeat it, which is just confusing.

5

‘Elemental’ (2023)

The lead characters of Elemental
The lead characters of Elemental
Image via Pixar Animation Studios
Advertisement

Ember Lumen (Leah Lewis) is a Fire Elemental living in Elemental City, and is set to inherit the convenient store operated by her traditionalist parents. However, due to one of her fiery outbursts, a pipe bursts in the basement, and Water Elemental inspector Wade Ripple (Mamoudou Athie) is forced to report it to City Hall, which could get the store shut down. They talk to Wade’s Air Elemental boss, who agrees to overlook the burst pipe if they can find the source of a leak that threatens the city, and during the investigation, Ember and Wade fall in love.

Elemental is another mixed bag of a generic film that fares a little better thanks to its creativity and emotional storytelling. The designs of the elementals are fun and vibrant, and the filmmakers get creative in demonstrating how each element can be utilized or combined to make something new. As for the story, it contains many themes and experiences relevant to immigrant families, especially through Ember’s complex relationship with her father.

4

‘Onward’ (2020)

The elf brothers Ian and Barley looking confused in Onward
The elf brothers Ian and Barley in Onward
Image via Pixar Animation Studios
Advertisement

Ian Lightfoot (Tom Holland) is a young elf living with his widowed mother, Laurel (Julia Louis-Dreyfus), and elder brother, Barley (Chris Pratt), in a world where mythical creatures have become mundane and modern. On his sixteenth birthday, Ian receives a magic staff from his deceased father, Wilden (Kyle Bornheimer), and instructions on a spell that can revive him for one day. The spell is interrupted midway, only returning Wilden’s lower body, so the brothers set off on a quest to find the needed component to cast the spell before sundown.

Another film hurt financially by COVID, Onward has a surprising level of heart and creativity put into its story. A world where magical creatures have become mundane and have to learn to rediscover their abilities is not without promise, even if it doesn’t always live up to its potential, and the relationship between the brothers is genuine and emotionally compelling. The climax feels right at home with classic Pixar, hitting you with a mature moral that is just as applicable to older audiences as younger.

3

‘Inside Out 2’ (2024)

The main emotions of Inside Out 2 in the control room Image via Pixar Animation Studios
Advertisement

Two years after her move to San Francisco, Riley Andersen (Kensington Tallman) is preparing for high school and plans to attend a three-day hockey camp with her friends. Unfortunately for her team of emotions—Joy (Amy Poehler), Sadness (Phyllis Smith), Anger (Lewis Black), Fear (Tony Hale), and Disgust (Liza Lapira)—Riley starts going through puberty, bringing in new emotions—Anxiety (Maya Hawke), Embarrassment (Paul Walter Hauser), Envy (Ayo Edebiri), and Ennui (Adèle Exarchopoulos). Anxiety takes over the control room and becomes obsessed with helping Riley secure a spot on her future high school hockey team, kicking Joy and the other old emotions out and beginning to construct a new “sense of self” for Riley.

A major box office success, Inside Out 2 follows a plot structure that is more or less the same as the first movie, just with a new team of emotions, and Joy going on an adventure to save Riley with the entire team instead of Sadness. It’s not bad: there are some great visual representations of how anxiety can get you stuck in tunnel vision and spiral into a full-on panic attack, and the new “sense of self” continues the franchise’s emphasis on how the human mind and personality are always changing. It just would have been nice if the story took a few more risks, or if any of the new emotions besides Anxiety had stand-out personalities or more of an impact on the plot.

2

‘Luca’ (2021)

Luca jumps through the air in mid-transformation in Pixar's Luca
Luca jumps through the air in mid-transformation in Pixar’s Luca
Image via Pixar Animation Studios
Advertisement

Off the coast of the Italian town of Portorosso lives Luca Paguro (Jacob Tremblay), a young sea-monster who spends his day herding fish and avoiding notice from humans. One day, he meets another young sea monster named Alberto Scorfano (Jack Dylan Grazer), who shows him how to disguise himself as a human and shares his dream of traveling the world on a Vespa. His parents try to stop him, so Luca and Alberto run off to Portorosso and meet a young girl named Giulia Marcovaldo (Emma Berman), who suggests they team up to win the town’s annual triathlon.

Luca has been compared to a Studio Ghibli film in terms of its tone, and that’s a pretty apt comparison. It’s a very down-to-earth and low-stakes film, focusing on a small slice-of-life adventure with relatable characters who go through timeless coming-of-age arcs. The sea monsters themselves are also well utilized, with their status as “the other” giving them plenty of flexibility in terms of what they can represent, from immigrants who must conform to their new surroundings to queer people who hide their true selves.

1

‘Soul’ (2020)

Two large trasparent beings over two smaller, blue-ish creatures in the film 'Soul’ (2020) Image via Pixar Animation Studios
Advertisement

Joe Gardner (Jamie Foxx) is a part-time music teacher and pianist who longs to play jazz professionally. Just as he gets his chance to play with famous singer Dorothea Williams (Angela Bassett), he falls down an open manhole and soon finds his spirit preparing to travel to the Great Beyond. He escapes into the Great Before, where new souls await birth, and meets 22 (Tina Fey), a soul who is disillusioned about the idea of existence but agrees to help Joe get back to his life if he can help her find her “spark.”

Soul is easily Pixar’s most existential film, touching on such heavy concepts as determinism vs predeterminism, the meaning of life, and depression. It’s a film that not only gets you thinking about the nature of existence, but also how the little things in life that we take for granted can sometimes have the greatest impact, not just on ourselves, but on those we interact with. Joe is also the perfect protagonist to explore such themes, as his struggles with trying to balance the pursuit of his dream with managing his day job feel more relatable than ever.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

Entertainment

13 Years Later, Matt Damon’s Gritty Sci-Fi Thriller Finds Redemption on Streaming

Published

on

A man in power armour walking towards the camera

It is always challenging for a filmmaker who broke through with their debut film to land a second feature, as they will be assessed on whether they lived up to their own hype. Neill Blomkamp had a more difficult time of it than most, considering that his first feature, 2009’s District 9 , was a word-of-mouth hit that felt like a completely new spin on the science fiction genre, and earned surprising Academy Awards nominations for Best Picture and Best Adapted Screenplay. So expectations were sky-high for his second film, 2013’s Elysium, which presented a grounded look at a not-so-distant future in which class discrepancies have resulted in mass inequality. Elysium was criticized at the time for being too pointed and obvious in its political criticisms, but the film has held up remarkably well when considering the dramatic changes to the U.S. healthcare system that have occurred within the 13 years since it was released. Now more than ever, Elysium isn’t just an entertaining cyberpunk thriller with appropriately gritty action, but a searing indictment of the consolidation of power in crisis situations.

Set in the year 2154, Elysium imagines an Earth that has become overpopulated and devastated by environmental damage, meaning that most citizens have to work under laborious conditions to keep producing technology. Pollution and the depletion of resources have made the planet largely inhospitable, as it is ravaged by disease; in response, the wealthiest and most powerful members of the human race have escaped to the space station Elysium, which circles the Earth and contains advanced medical supplies. Elysium is only accessible to those who can afford it — it’s designed to exclude people like Max Da Costa (Matt Damon), who has been denied any opportunities to cure his life-threatening illness because of his criminal history. Elysium looks at the differences between the haves and have-nots in a direct way, but Blomkamp’s exhilarating, visceral sci-fi mythology ensures that it is still a riveting genre film.

Advertisement

‘Elysium’ Is an Eerie, Terrifyingly Dystopian Story

A man in power armour walking towards the camera

Though it’s sci-fi, Elysium succeeds at creating a story audiences can identify with because the circumstances that Max is dealing with are relatable, regardless of whether they are connected to any sci-fi themes. Max is simply a man who is desperately looking for work to support both himself and his childhood friend, Frey (Alice Braga), whose daughter Matilda (Emma Tremblay) has leukemia. Although Max recognizes that he is competing against other poor people who are in the same position, and that he will have even more difficulties finding work because of his criminal history, injuries he sustains in the midst of performing manual labor soon make his own health status equally pressing. That average citizens would be stripped of the resources that they need to survive, let alone not be offered any dignity, is not a concept that is based in science fiction, as it reflects present reality far closer than anyone watching Elysium in 2013 would have expected. Blomkamp makes a smart environmentalist point by showing that it may be corporations and conglomerates that pollute the world, but it will be average people who have to pay the price.

Elysium uses its sci-fi premise to show how those with wealth can create their own reality because they are not burdened by any directive to show compassion. The notion of pooling medical resources for those of the upper class is not a science fiction concept, as the only “imagined” component in Blomkamp’s universe is that this would extend to the monopolization of space; today, it’s a much less farfetched concept than it appeared to be in 2013. Another smart link that Blomkamp makes is between the healthcare systems, the government, and the military-industrial complex, as he implies that they’ve all conspired to rig the market so that class ascension is impossible. This explains why characters like Max feel so powerless, and why they must resort to extreme measures in order to protect themselves; even if they spent a lifetime living by the rules of Earth’s governments, they could never hope to be among the select few allowed to live on Elysium.

Advertisement

‘Elysium’ Features a Compelling Moral Dilemma

Elysium thoughtfully considers what kinds of desperate situations could turn someone into a revolutionary figure, but the film is also a visceral action thriller that makes use of all the brutality allowed by an R-rating. There’s a significant disparity within the style of filmmaking used when depicting Earth and Elysium; the planet is dirty and damaged, feeling like a never-ending wasteland, whereas the space station has a slick, nearly retro-futuristic feel. The opulent beauty of Elysium is effective because it is infuriating to see the gross excess within a society that only allows a select few to enter, giving it an Imperialist feel. At the same time, the film paints a realistic portrayal of what Earth may look like should ecocide continue, and it’s a future that feels far more plausible in the aftermath of the U.S.’s exit from the Paris Accords.

Elysium presents a dark future that is sadly identifiable, but the film still works as a piece of summer entertainment because it does believe in heroes. Max is not just the perfect redemptive protagonist because he ends up learning that there is more to fight for than just himself; he becomes a symbol that the rest of those on Earth can get behind. Elysium showed in no uncertain terms what Earth could transform into if it headed on its current trajectory, but its most radical decision may have been its faith in human kindness.


01121250_poster_w780.jpg
Advertisement


Elysium

Advertisement


Release Date

August 9, 2013

Runtime
Advertisement

109 minutes


Advertisement

Advertisement


Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Entertainment

Christy Carlson Romano Opens Up About Hayden Panettiere

Published

on

Christy Carlson Romano at the 2018 Radio Disney Music Awards

Former Disney star Christy Carlson Romano is reflecting on child stardom just days after her peer, Hayden Panettiere, died suddenly at 36. In a personal essay, the “Even Stevens” actress compared child stardom to the deadly brain disease CTE.

Christy Carlson Romano at the 2018 Radio Disney Music Awards
O’Connor/AFF-USA.com / MEGA

Romano knows a thing or two about being a child star. In addition to working alongside Shia LaBeouf on “Even Stevens,” the actress appeared in her own series, “Kim Possible,” and the Disney Channel original film “Cadet Kelly.”

In a personal essay for Elle, Romano said nothing can prepare children for what it’s like to be famous at such a young age. “The former child actor exists in a category the world does not know how to hold,” she wrote. “We are children when the public wants to feel protective of us, professionals when the industry wants to profit from us, and spoiled celebrities when we eventually show symptoms of having been both.”

Romano, 42, said fame at an early age is comparable to “CTE,” the deadly brain disease Chronic Traumatic Encephalopathy. “Not as a diagnosis. As a way of thinking about repeated impact,” Romano added.

Hayden Panettiere Was Pronounced Dead At A South Carolina Residence In August 2026

Hayden Panettiere (1989-2026)
AdMedia / MediaPunch / MEGA

Romano’s comments come just days after Panettiere was pronounced dead at a South Carolina residence in August 2026. First responders said that they were responding to a call about a person suffering a “cardiac arrest.”

Panettiere’s father released a statement to the media after her death, calling her an “incredible light and a force of nature.” He added that his daughter, who began acting at the age of 1, “brought immeasurable love and joy to all who knew her.”

Advertisement

Romano Is ‘Crushed’ Over Panettiere’s Death

Hayden Panettiere
Francis Dias/NEWSPIX INTERNATIONAL / MEGA

Romano went even further about the harsh reality of being a child star in her personal essay, saying that while child actors are seen as “lucky” and “cute,” she said their labor “powers one of the most profitable storytelling machines in the world,” leaving some of them struggling with their mental health.

Regarding Panettiere’s death, Romano admitted she was “crushed” and deeply saddened by the news. “Another performer I grew up with, gone too soon,” she wrote.

Months before her death, Panettiere reflected on living her life in the spotlight from an early age and told Jay Shetty that it was really all she knew. According to the “Heroes” actress, acting was forced upon her almost instantly.

“I think it’s the way I was raised,” she said. “I was groomed. I was like a little soldier and I always have been. No was never an option. It was just, ‘Here are your scenes, here’s your dialogue, memorize it, hit the marks, do what your director tells you to do.’ I took my marching orders.”

Panettiere’s Relationship With Her Mother Was Painful

Hayden Panettiere
AdMedia / MEGA

Panettiere detailed her time as a child star in her book, “This Is Me,” and said she felt the pressure to be top tier. Elsewhere in the memoir, the “Remember the Titans” actress opened up about her rocky relationship with her mother, Lesley, and said that disappointing her with a lackluster audition felt like “a fate worse than death.”

“When she was irritated, she opened her mouth ever so slightly. When she was mad, she clenched her jaw. When she was so angry that my best option was to hide under my bed, her lower jaw migrated a few centimeters forward. I looked up and back at Mom, and there was that soul-shattering underbite,” she wrote.

Advertisement

Viola Davis Honors Hayden Panettiere

Hollywood’s elite have come together over the last several days to honor Panettiere’s life. According to a previous report from The Blast, Davis shared a series of images of them on her Instagram and reflected on the time they spent together while making the film “Custody.”

“I saw this beautiful Phoenix rising from the ashes. Your tests became your testimony, and your testimony became your legacy. You will be remembered. Rest well, Hayden. Sending healing prayers to your family, your daughter, and all who loved you. May they always speak your name,” Davis captioned the post.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Entertainment

Josh Radnor Says ‘HIMYM’ Cast Is No Longer Close

Published

on

‘How I Met Your Mother’ Cast ‘Stunned’ Over Bob Saget’s Passing

For nine seasons, Josh Radnor and his “How I Met Your Mother” co-stars spent countless hours together, becoming one of TV’s most beloved friend groups. Several years after the sitcom wrapped, however, that close-knit bond has changed. Radnor recently opened up about his relationship with his former castmates, revealing that he is no longer close with them while making it clear that he still has a deep love for all of them.

‘How I Met Your Mother’ Cast ‘Stunned’ Over Bob Saget’s Passing
MEGA

“How I Met Your Mother” aired for nine seasons from 2005 to 2014 with more than 200 episodes. It followed the lives of a tight-knit group of friends in New York City: Ted Mosby (Josh Radnor), Marshall Eriksen (Jason Segel), Lily Aldrin (Alyson Hannigan), Barney Stinson (Neil Patrick Harris), and Robin Scherbatsky (Cobie Smulders), as they navigated the ups and downs of adulthood.

More than a decade after the series wrapped, Radnor shares that his relationship with his former co-stars has changed. Appearing on the “Half the Picture” podcast, the actor was asked if he’s still close to his TV friend group, to which he answered. “No. Not even a little bit.”

Radnor explained that the distance didn’t happen in “any dramatic way.” Rather, they just drifted apart.

Advertisement

“It’s like college where you have this very intense time together, and you can’t imagine not seeing each other every day because you’ve seen each other every day for so long. And then it just disperses, and you just go out and live your life,” Radnor said.

The Actor Has A Deep Love For His Former Castmates

Radnor shared that while the friendship dynamic has changed, he still gets to connect with his “HIMYM” co-stars in some capacity.

He exchanges text messages with Segel “once in a while” to reminisce about things that happened on set. Smulders appeared as a guest on his podcast via Zoom, as did Harris. As for Hannigan, Radnor shared that the actress attended his wedding in 2024, but hasn’t seen her since.

Radnor said his relationship with them was more like family, saying that they were cast in the series and didn’t “choose” each other. “You also have love that is quite deep and rich and probably everlasting, but it’s not an active love,” he explained.

Advertisement

Josh Radnor Had A ‘Healing’ Conversation With Neil Patrick Harris

Neil Patrick Harris at "The Unbearable Weight Of Massive Talent" New York Screening
MEGA

Radnor co-hosts the podcast “How We Made Your Mother” with series co-creator Craig Thomas. In March, Harris appeared as a guest, and the former co-stars discussed their working relationship.

At one point, Harris said, “I always kind of felt that my performance annoyed you, Josh.” Radnor was surprised at the admission and asked Harris to elaborate. The latter said that in portraying his character, a charismatic womanizer, he sensed Radnor’s “frustration” over his “spit takes.”

Radnor said he felt a bit of “tension” at times, but in his opinion, it stemmed from drawing the line between Harris and the character he played. “Barney was often incredibly almost dismissive of Ted, and you were so good at playing that. I think sometimes I felt dismissed by Neil, but I was being dismissed by Barney,” Radnor said.

Despite the tension, Radnor admitted he enjoyed their “weird chemistry,” and Harris appreciated that they were able to have the conversation.

Josh Radnor Distanced Himself From ‘How I Met Your Mother’

After playing the hopeless romantic architect Ted Mosby for nine years, Radnor admitted that he did everything he could to distance himself from the show. He also rejected roles that had “any hint of single guy in the big city looking for love,” as he didn’t want to be typecast.

Advertisement

In the years following, he played a Civil War surgeon in the series “Mercy Street,” a high school drama teacher in “Rise,” and a Nazi-hunting movie star in “Hunters,” in addition to appearing in theater productions. He also took on roles behind the camera and pursued writing and directing.

Now that he has done multiple projects, he embraces his time on the series with the understanding that he is no longer defined by that one role.

‘How I Met Your Mother’ Had A Spin-Off Series

In 2022, the spin-off series “How I Met Your Father” premiered. While it featured a whole new cast and independent storyline, the show shares the same universe as the original series. It featured Hilary Duff as Sophie Tompkins, who, alongside her group of friends, navigates love and relationships in the age of dating apps.

Both Smulders and Harris returned to their respective roles as guest stars in separate episodes, though the series ultimately received mixed reviews and was canceled after two seasons.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Entertainment

Keanu Reeves’ 118-Minute Fantasy Epic Is Quietly One of the Best on Netflix

Published

on

Keanu Reeves as Kai brandishing his samurai sword in 47 Ronin

There are very few actors who have re-defined the action movie like Keanu Reeves. The Matrix remains an impeccable blend of mind-bending visual effects and beautifully brutal fight scenes, and a true game changer for pop culture. Speed is the kind of white-knuckle thriller that’s rare to find these days. John Wick created an entirely new subgenre of action movies that lasts to this day. One of Reeves’ more underrated action movies is currently available to stream on Netflix, and it takes a fantasy-fueled approach to an iconic Japanese legend.

That movie is 47 Ronin, which made its debut all the way back in 2013. Adapting the story of Chūshingura, 47 Ronin takes place in the waning days of feudal-era Japan and follows Kai (Reeves), a half-Japanese, half-British swordsman. Kai is taken in by a prominent samurai, but when said samurai is killed by his rival, Lord Kira (Tadanobu Asano), Kai joins forces with 47 of the samurai’s men to take their vengeance. Though it was critically panned upon release, 47 Ronin is at least worth a watch to see how certain legends can change based on the medium they’re in.

Advertisement

’47 Ronin’ Blends An Iconic Japanese Legend With Fantasy Elements

Keanu Reeves as Kai brandishing his samurai sword in 47 Ronin
Keanu Reeves as Kai brandishing his samurai sword in 47 Ronin
Image by Universal

The tale of the 47 Ronin is surprisingly straightforward: after their master is slain, the titular warriors break into his killer’s house and exact vengeance, ultimately committing seppuku after they’re caught. While 47 Ronin keeps the same story beats, it shakes things up by introducing supernatural elements. Kai fights a massive golem in one scene that takes on the form of a samurai warrior. In another, he has to do battle with a massive, serpentine dragon. The ronin must also contend with Mizuki (Rinko Kikuchi), the malevolent witch who aids Kira in his goals. These fantasy elements caused most of the criticism, as some critics felt what should have been a simple samurai tale came off more like a Lord of the Rings ripoff.

47 Ronin became one of the biggest box-office bombs of 2013, with blame shifted to Universal Pictures for locking director Carl Rinsch out of the editing process and trying to beef up Reeves’ role in the narrative. 47 Ronin would eventually receive a sequel in the form of Blade of the 47 Ronin, where one of the ronin’s blades ends up at the center of yet another supernatural battle. It was even more off the wall than its predecessor, though it skipped theaters in favor of the VOD route. Carl Rinsch would later be tapped to helm the science fiction series White Horse for Netflix, but that fell apart when the streamer sued him for misspending the funds.













Advertisement



















































Collider Exclusive · Action Hero Quiz
Which Action Hero Would Be
Your Perfect Partner?

Rambo · James Bond · Indiana Jones · John McClane · Ethan Hunt
Advertisement

Five legends. Five completely different ways of getting out alive — with style, with muscle, with charm, with luck, or with a plan so intricate it probably shouldn’t work. Ten questions will reveal which action hero was built to have your back.

🎖️Rambo

🍸James Bond

🏺Indiana Jones

🔧John McClane

Advertisement

🎭Ethan Hunt

Advertisement

01

You’re dropped into a dangerous situation with no warning. What do you need most from a partner?
The first few seconds tell you everything about who belongs beside you.





Advertisement

02

You have to get somewhere dangerous, fast. How do you travel?
How you get there is half the mission.





Advertisement

03

You’re pinned down and outnumbered. What does your ideal partner do?
This is when you find out what someone is really made of.





Advertisement

04

The mission is paused. You have one evening to decompress. What does your partner suggest?
Who someone is when the pressure drops is who they actually are.





Advertisement

05

How do you prefer your partner to communicate mid-mission?
Good communication is the difference between partners and a liability.





Advertisement

06

Your enemy is powerful, well-resourced, and has the upper hand. How should your partner approach them?
The approach to the enemy defines the partnership.





Advertisement

07

Things go badly wrong and you’re captured. What do you trust your partner to do?
Who someone is when you need them most is the only thing that matters.





Advertisement

08

What does your ideal partner bring to the table that you couldn’t replace?
A great partner fills the gap you didn’t know you had.





Advertisement

09

Every partnership has a cost. Which of these can you live with?
No one comes without baggage. The question is whether you can carry it together.





Advertisement

10

It’s the final moment. Everything is on the line. What do you need from your partner right now?
The last question is the most honest one.





Advertisement
Your Partner Has Been Assigned
Your Perfect Partner Is…

Your answers have pointed to one action hero above all others. This is the person built to have your back — for better or considerably, spectacularly worse.

Rambo

Advertisement

Your partner doesn’t talk much, doesn’t need to, and will have assessed every threat in your immediate environment before you’ve finished your first sentence. John Rambo is not a man of plans or politics — he is a force of nature shaped by survival, loyalty, and a capacity for endurance that goes beyond anything training can produce. He will not leave you behind. He has never left anyone behind who deserved to come home. What you get with Rambo is the most capable, most quietly ferocious partner imaginable — one who has been through things that would have broken anyone else, and who chose to keep going anyway. You’ll never need to ask if he has your back. You’ll just know.

James Bond

Your partner will arrive perfectly dressed, perfectly briefed, and with a cover story so convincing it’ll take you a moment to remember what’s actually true. James Bond is the most professionally dangerous person in any room he enters — and the most disarmingly charming, which is the point. He operates in a world of layers, where nothing is what it appears and every advantage is used without apology. You’ll never be bored. You’ll occasionally be furious. But when it matters — when the mission is genuinely on the line and the margin for error has collapsed to nothing — Bond is exactly the partner you want. He has survived things that have no business being survivable. He does it with style. That is not nothing.

Advertisement

Indiana Jones

Your partner will know the history, the language, the cultural context, and exactly why the thing everyone else is ignoring is actually the most important thing in the room. Indiana Jones is brilliant, reckless, and occasionally impossible — but he is also one of the most resourceful, most genuinely knowledgeable partners you could find yourself beside. He approaches every situation with a scholar’s eye and a brawler’s instinct, which is an unusual combination and a remarkably effective one. He hates snakes and gets personally attached to objects of historical significance, both of which will slow you down at least once. It doesn’t matter. What Indy brings is irreplaceable — and the adventures you’ll have together will be the kind people write books about. Assuming you survive them.

Advertisement

John McClane

Your partner was not supposed to be here. He does not have the right equipment, the right information, or anything approaching the right odds. He has a sarcastic remark and an absolute refusal to accept that the situation is as bad as it looks. John McClane is the greatest accidental hero in the history of action cinema — a man whose superpower is stubbornness, whose contingency plan is improvisation, and whose capacity to absorb punishment and keep moving would be alarming if it weren’t so useful. He will complain the entire time. He will make it significantly more chaotic than it needed to be. And he will absolutely, unconditionally, without question come through when it counts. Yippee-ki-yay.

Ethan Hunt

Advertisement

Your partner has already run seventeen scenarios by the time you’ve finished reading the briefing, and the plan he’s settled on involves at least two things that should be physically impossible. Ethan Hunt operates at the absolute edge of human capability — technically, physically, and intellectually — and he brings the same relentless precision to protecting his partners that he brings to dismantling organisations that shouldn’t exist. He is not easy to know and he will never fully tell you everything. But he will carry the weight of the mission so completely, so absolutely, that your job is simply to trust him — and the remarkable thing is that trusting him always turns out to be the right call. The mission will be impossible. He will complete it anyway.

Advertisement

Keanu Reeves Surprisingly Isn’t the Standout of ’47 Ronin’

Despite having top billing in 47 Ronin, Keanu Reeves has a very small role in the final movie. Part of that is due to the fact that Reeves was making his directorial debut in the martial arts movie Man of Tai Chi, but the fact is that the story already had a protagonist in the form of Yoshio Ōishi (Hiroyuki Sanada). In the original legend of the 47 Ronin, Ōishi serves as the leader of the other Ronin; Sanada brings a gravity to the scene that helps ground the story in actual emotion. Sanada also told Collider prior to 47 Ronin‘s release that the movie held a special meaning for him:

“It’s a very special movie for me. Not only a Samurai thing. Not only a Hollywood fantasy. It has a very special mixture between Japanese traditional culture and Western culture for the costume, set, story. Everything. I believe it will be a very special film that no one has ever seen.”

While 47 Ronin might not be among Keanu Reeves’ best movies, it’s definitely ambitious enough to warrant a watch. The mix of history and fantasy is the kind of bold swing you rarely see in Hollywood, and it proves Reeves still pushes the boundaries of what can be done in the action genre.

Advertisement


47 Ronin Movie Poster

Advertisement


Release Date

December 25, 2013

Advertisement

Runtime

128 Minutes

Advertisement

Advertisement


Advertisement

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Entertainment

Isla Fisher’s Romantic Floral Dress Is an End-of-Summer Dream

Published

on

Vanessa Hudgens attends the 2026 HollyShorts Film Festival at TCL Chinese Theatre on August 13, 2026 in Hollywood, California.

Us Weekly has affiliate partnerships. We receive compensation when you click on a link and make a purchase. Learn more!

Consider this your sign to squeeze a few more romantic dresses into your wardrobe before summer slips away. Isla Fisher made the case for a dreamy floral maxi that works for everything from date nights to late-summer weddings, and we found a similar style on Amazon for $64.

Fisher was spotted in New York City on August 17, 2026, wearing a cream floral gown covered in a vintage-inspired pink print. Between the slimming mermaid silhouette, delicate bow-tie straps and soft color palette, the dress style has an effortlessly romantic feel that’s practically made for a candlelit dinner.

Advertisement

Get the Kutumai Ruffle Long Floral Maxi Dress for $64 at Amazon! Please note, prices are accurate at the date of publication, August 19, 2026, but are subject to change.

Luckily, recreating the look doesn’t require a celebrity-sized budget. The $64 Kutumai Floral Maxi Dress captures the same feminine feel with a cream backdrop, pink florals and a long, fitted shape. And while we like the rosy color, the dress also comes in black, light blue, lavender and several other shades on Amazon.

Vanessa Hudgens attends the 2026 HollyShorts Film Festival at TCL Chinese Theatre on August 13, 2026 in Hollywood, California.


Related: Vanessa Hudgens’ Sparkly Date Night Bag Has a $24 Lookalike

Advertisement

Vanessa Hudgens found an accessory that can make even the simplest fall date night outfit feel instantly more glamorous. A sparkly silver bag adds just enough shimmer to jeans and a cute top, a little black dress or even a cozy sweater-and-skirt combo. And while her version looks seriously luxe, you can recreate the vibe […]

Made with soft, semi-stretchy fabric, the dress hugs and flatters the figure up top before flowing out into a champagne-flute shape that’s similar to Fisher’s. The sleeveless maxi also features a thick, double-layered design for a more substantial feel.

Shoppers are just as taken with the ‘fit. One reviewer called it the “perfect dress for formal or everyday occasions” and said the “champagne flute silhouette is so flattering.” Meanwhile, another buyer shopping as a wedding guest wrote that the dress is “extremely comfortable” and “hugs the waist and hip just right.”

With warm evenings still on the calendar, there’s plenty of time to put this romantic look to work. Wear it for date nights, dinners, outdoor weddings or any end-of-summer plan that calls for something a little more upscale than your usual sundress — all while getting Fisher’s dreamy floral look for $64.

Advertisement

 

Swooning over Fisher’s floral dress? Shop more romantic Amazon options below!

Shop more floral maxi dresses that we love:

Not your style? Explore more floral dresses here, and don’t forget to check out all of Amazon’s Daily Deals for more great finds!

Advertisement

UsNow Summer Sale Alert: These Chic Fashion Finds are over 30% off – Plus Free Shipping

Welcome to summer with our biggest sale of the year. This summer’s chicest dresses, tops and swimsuits are all over 30% + free shipping. Inventory is limited so hurry before they’re gone.

Shop the UsNow Summer Sale –> 

Advertisement
Karlie Kloss is seen in Midtown on August 11, 2026 in New York City.


Related: Karlie Kloss Proved Polka Dots Are the Prettiest Print of Summer

Karlie Kloss may have just convinced Us to give our floral dresses a break. The supermodel’s latest look puts a fresh spin on classic polka dots, pairing the playful print with an ultra-feminine silhouette that feels made for the final weeks of summer. Even better, we found a similar style for less than $30. Kloss […]

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Entertainment

Star Wars’ New 91% RT Series Quietly Settles the Franchise’s Biggest Debate About the Force

Published

on

Lah Kara with a lightsaber with a silver blade in the Star Wars anime 'The Ninth Jedi"

Editor’s note: The below contains spoilers for Star Wars: Visions Presents – The Ninth Jedi.

When it comes to a franchise as rich in lore as Star Wars, it’s sometimes difficult to reconcile what fans think or understand about certain aspects. One of those is what it really means for the Force to be in balance and how to achieve it, which is usually followed by the concept of Grey Jedi as individuals who can supposedly draw from both the Light and Dark Sides of the Force to walk the path between the Jedi and the Sith. The franchise’s most recent release, Star Wars: Visions Presents – The Ninth Jedi, fully debunks this idea and, for the first time in a Lucasfilm-produced Star Wars project, proves that there is no such thing as Grey Jedi.

Advertisement

‘The Ninth Jedi’ Deconstructs the Idea of the Grey Jedi

The idea of Grey Jedi has been around for a while, and The Ninth Jedi tackles it head-on in its first season as a proper Star Wars: Visions spin-off. In the story, former Jedi and antagonist Nawaam (Young Mazino) believes in the “State of Nothingness” to truly achieve balance and bring peace and order to the galaxy, discarding the path of both the Jedi and the Sith. Protagonist Lah Kara (Kimiko Glenn) and her father, Lah Zhima (Simu Liu), also reach Nothingness.

At first glance, Nothingness might seem attractive. It’s an emotionless state of heightened senses that makes a lightsaber blade glow silver; in The Ninth Jedi, a lightsaber’s color reflects its wielder’s heart. This allows warriors to make decisions they otherwise couldn’t as Jedi or Sith, including killing, claiming to truly be guided by the Force without emotions clouding their judgments. Zhima himself is a master of Nothingness, and that’s what influences both Nawaam and Kara to pursue it in their own ways.

Although The Ninth Jedi doesn’t explicitly call it that, Nothingness is very similar to how Grey Jedi approach the Force, but it outright rejects this concept. During their climactic final battle, both Nawaam’s and Kara’s lightsabers revert to colored blades; Kara’s goes back to Jedi green, while Nawaam’s becomes red for the first time. Right then, it becomes clear that each character’s actions have weight and tilt them towards opposite directions in the Force.

Advertisement

Lucasfilm Canon Is Clear About What True Balance in the Force Really Means

Lah Kara with a lightsaber with a silver blade in the Star Wars anime 'The Ninth Jedi"
Lah Kara wielding a lightsaber with a silver blade in the Star Wars anime series ‘The Ninth Jedi”
Image via Lucasfilm

Like the State of Nothingness, the idea of Grey Jedi might seem reasonable at first, especially given that most tragedies in Star Wars stem from characters who don’t really fit within the Jedi or Sith framework, like Anakin Skywalker (Hayden Christensen) and Kylo Ren (Adam Driver). This gives the false impression that both approaches are equally wrong, or that “calibrating” these characters towards the center would prevent new tragedies.

That’s not how it works at all. Even before Disney established the new canon, Star Wars, as created by George Lucas, makes clear that using the Force in unnatural ways throws it off balance. It isn’t about finding common ground between the Dark Side and the Light, but following the will of the Force instead of bending it to your will. The concept of Grey Jedi as a representation of balance is therefore fundamentally wrong, because every dark deed, small as it may be and as necessary as it might seem, causes imbalance.

The Ninth Jedi isn’t official canon (nothing connected to Star Wars: Visions is), but it offers the clearest understanding of how the Force really works. Kara achieves Nothingness, but turns back to the Light once she understands that balance is about selflessness, not neutrality or a “flow state.” Meanwhile, Nawaam is so fixated on this false notion of balance that he becomes obsessive about it, finally revealing the darkness inherent to neutrality. Grey is many shades darker than the Light, after all.

Advertisement

Are There Actually Any Grey Jedi in Star Wars?

Nawaam is particularly enticing because, in the eagerness of trying to make sense of his interpretation of the Force, people might feel the urge to label him as a Grey Jedi, but that’s wrong. He isn’t a Jedi at all, and wielding a lightsaber of any color doesn’t necessarily make anyone a Jedi of any “shade” (although Jedi don’t have “shades,” too). This misguided notion of balance that some subscribe to often leads to wrong conclusions about characters as nuanced as Nawaam, including fan-favorites.

Qui-Gon Jinn (Liam Neeson), for example, isn’t “grey” at all. He is definitely a maverick among the Jedi for confronting the Council when no one else dares to. If anything, Qui-Gon shines even brighter in the Light than the Council of his time. Ahsoka Tano (Rosario Dawson), who straight up leaves the Order due to irreconcilable differences during the Clone Wars, also isn’t “grey,” having repeatedly proven her commitment to the Light.

This concept of “Grey Jedi” gained traction especially after Knights of the Old Republic introduced Jolee Bindo, a Jedi who claims to see the Force “only in grey” — so much so that he actually leaves the Jedi because he knows he doesn’t fit within the Order anymore. Revan himself is like a “poster child” for Grey Jedi enthusiasts, when, in fact, he has swung so much between the Jedi and the Sith that he ends up being neither. The Ninth Jedi, despite not being official Star Wars canon, has not only challenged the very concept of the Grey Jedi in the franchise but also redefined what true balance in the Force really means.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Entertainment

Before ‘Yellowstone,’ James Stewart’s Oscar-Nominated Western Became a 2-Part Sleeper Hit

Published

on

Cochise stands in front of Tom Jeffords looking to the distance, in the TV adaptation of 'Broken Arrow.'

Very few actors had quite the reputation and range that Jimmy Stewart did, with the actor crossing into nearly every major genre during his career. But aside from the likes of It’s a Wonderful Life and Rear Window, perhaps the most prolific genre of the movie star’s career was the American Western, a type of motion picture that idealized the Old West while often analyzing modern issues. One such Western was the 1950 picture Broken Arrow, which jumped leaps and bounds ahead of its contemporaries when it came to representing Native American peoples in a positive light.

In fact, the film was so notable, earning itself three Oscar nominations and a Golden Globe Award for Best Film Promoting International Understanding, that ABC opted to bring the story to television just six years later, albeit without the picture’s delectable star. Even without Stewart in the lead, the Western became a two-season, 72-episode series.

Advertisement

Jimmy Stewart’s ‘Broken Arrow’ Led to a Television Adaptation Years Later

The thing about Broken Arrow is that, although it cast non-Native actors in Apache Indian roles (which was common practice in Hollywood back in the day), it was leaps and bounds ahead of many other Westerns in the way they tackled Native American issues. Prior to that, films like Stagecoach and Drums Along the Mohawk depicted these “wild warriors” as simple antagonists with no real depth. Broken Arrow, while not the only film to do this, was one of the first to give a real voice to the Indigenous population, which was hard to come by in 1950. Of course, it helps that the film was based on Elliott Arnold‘s book Blood Brothers, which itself was based on the real-life history and friendship between Tom Jeffords and Apache chief Cochise (played in the picture by James Stewart and Jeff Chandler respectively).































































Advertisement

Collider Exclusive · Oscar Best Picture Quiz
Which Oscar Best Picture
Is Your Perfect Movie?

Parasite · Everything Everywhere · Oppenheimer · Birdman · No Country

Five Oscar Best Picture winners. Five completely different visions of what cinema can be — and what it can do to you. One of them is the film that was made for the way your mind works. Ten questions will figure out which one.

🪜Parasite

🌀Everything Everywhere

Advertisement

☢️Oppenheimer

🐦Birdman

🪙No Country for Old Men

Advertisement

01

What kind of film experience do you actually want?
The best movies don’t just entertain — they leave something behind.





Advertisement

02

Which idea grabs you most in a film?
Great films are driven by a central obsession. What’s yours?





Advertisement

03

How do you like your story told?
Form is content. The way a story is shaped changes what it means.





Advertisement

04

What makes a truly great antagonist?
The opposition defines the protagonist. What kind of opposition fascinates you?





Advertisement

05

What do you want from a film’s ending?
The final note is the one that lingers. What do you want it to sound like?





Advertisement

06

Which setting pulls you in most?
Where a film takes place shapes everything — mood, stakes, what’s even possible.





Advertisement

07

What cinematic craft impresses you most?
Every great film has a signature — a technical or artistic element that makes it unmistakable.





Advertisement

08

What kind of main character do you root for?
The protagonist is the lens. Who you choose to follow says something about you.





Advertisement

09

How do you feel about a film that takes its time?
Pace is a choice. Some films sprint; others let tension accumulate slowly, deliberately.





Advertisement

10

What do you want to feel walking out of the cinema?
The best films leave a mark. What kind of mark do you want?





Advertisement

The Academy Has Decided
Your Perfect Film Is…

Your answers have pointed to one Oscar Best Picture winner above all others. This is the film that was made for the way your mind works.

Advertisement

Parasite

You are drawn to films that operate on multiple levels simultaneously — that begin in one genre and quietly, brilliantly migrate into another. Bong Joon-ho’s Parasite is a film about class, desire, and the architecture of inequality that manages to be darkly funny, deeply suspenseful, and genuinely shocking across a single extraordinary running time. Your instinct is for cinema that hides its true intentions until the moment it’s ready to reveal them. Parasite is exactly that — a film that rewards close attention and punishes assumptions, right up to its devastating final image.

Advertisement

Everything Everywhere All at Once

You want it all — and this film gives you all of it. The Daniels’ Everything Everywhere All at Once is one of the most maximalist films ever made: action comedy, multiverse sci-fi, family drama, existential crisis, and a genuinely earned emotional core that sneaks up on you amid the chaos. You are someone who responds to ambition, who doesn’t want cinema to choose between being entertaining and being meaningful. This film refuses that choice entirely. It is overwhelming by design, and its overwhelming nature is precisely the point — because the feeling of being crushed by infinite possibility is exactly what it’s about.

Advertisement

Oppenheimer

You are drawn to cinema on a grand scale — films that understand history not as a backdrop but as a force, and that place their characters inside that force and watch what happens. Christopher Nolan’s Oppenheimer is a film about the terrifying gap between what we can do and what we should do, told with the full weight of one of the most consequential moments in human history behind it. You want your films to feel important without feeling self-important — to earn their ambition through sheer craft and the gravity of their subject. Oppenheimer does exactly that. It is enormous, complicated, and refuses easy comfort.

Advertisement

Birdman

You are drawn to films that foreground their own construction — that make the how of the filmmaking part of the what it’s about. Alejandro González Iñárritu’s Birdman, shot to appear as a single continuous take, is cinema examining itself through the cracked mirror of a fading actor’s ego. You respond to formal daring, to the feeling that a film is doing something that probably shouldn’t be possible. Michael Keaton’s performance and Emmanuel Lubezki’s restless camera create something genuinely unlike anything else — a film that is simultaneously about creativity, relevance, self-destruction, and the impossibility of ever truly knowing if your work means anything at all.

Advertisement

No Country for Old Men

You are drawn to cinema that trusts silence, that refuses to explain itself, and that treats dread as a form of meaning. The Coen Brothers’ No Country for Old Men is a film about the arrival of a new kind of evil — implacable, arbitrary, and utterly indifferent to the moral frameworks we use to make sense of the world. It is one of the most formally controlled films ever made, and its controlled restraint is what makes it so terrifying. You want your films to haunt you, not comfort you. You are not interested in resolution if resolution would be dishonest. No Country for Old Men is honest in a way that most cinema never dares to be.

Advertisement

Advertisement

Throughout the film, Jeffords and Cochise come to a mutual respect, and Jeffords (contrary to the historical account), even falls in love with and marries an Apache woman, Sonseeahray (Debra Paget). The pair begin to broker a real peace between the United States and the Apache people, and ultimately succeed. While the real story was a lot more bloody and a bit more tragic, the film offers us an idealistic take on how things might have gone. But where the motion picture opted to tell its own version of the events chronicled in Arnold’s account, the television adaptation of the book honored the original material a bit better. Keeping the popular and instantly recognizable Broken Arrow title, the series brought back Tom Jeffords and Cochise, now played by John Lupton and Michael Ansara (yes, the voice of Mr. Freeze in Batman: The Animated Series), starting with a reboot of the events told in the 1950 film.

Premiering on ABC in September 1956, Broken Arrow was instantly hailed as a classic by Donald Kirkley of The Baltimore Sun, who compared it favorably against the last season’s poorly received Brave Eagle. “Broken Arrow, although not without its shortcomings, is the best television program about Indians made yet,” the reviewer noted, hailing the show’s attempts at historical accuracy regarding the Apache people, and Cochise in particular. While the Blood Brothers book was still a fictional account, Arnold had carefully researched the life and friendship of Jeffords and Cochise, hence the television production’s decision to base itself strictly on the novel. Broadcasting Magazine once noted that the show was able to “skillfully [cram] a lot of story into 30 minutes.”

The ‘Broken Arrow’ TV Show Honored the Film’s Lofty Ideals

Cochise stands in front of Tom Jeffords looking to the distance, in the TV adaptation of 'Broken Arrow.'
Michael Ansara as Cochise and John Lupton as Tom Jeffords in the television adaptation of ‘Broken Arrow.’
Image via ABC
Advertisement

What the show did best, though, was build upon the ideals and themes first established in the 1950 film and continue the idea that the “white eyes” and Native Americans are equal, both in value and presence. John Lupton and Michael Ansara have pretty equal screen time on the show, something many outlets praised for its bold stance on the Native American issue. “This kind of friendship, although fairly common on the frontier, is very rare in fiction in any form,” remarked Kirkley, who adds that the dynamic between Lupton and Ansara’s characters is the kind of “freshness” that television needed at the time. This was done by design from the very beginning, as the series wanted to take the film’s concepts of tolerance and equality a step further onto the broadcast airwaves.

“We’ve created a happy medium between Jeffords and the Indian leader Cochise,” John Lupton told The Minneapolis Star in a 1957 interview. “Early this season we attempted to concentrate on Jeffords, but we found we were losing some of our audience and returned to the original format.” It turns out, the biggest reason folks tuned into ABC on Tuesday nights in the late 1950s was because of the very thing that Broken Arrow promoted, a shared understanding and experience of the Old West that blended these two cultures together. Ansara and Lupton worked well together, and the pair would play their characters side-by-side for 72 episodes between 1956 and 1958, at a time when the civil rights movement was really picking up steam. Still, even that wasn’t enough to keep the show (sometimes called Cochise in syndication) around for a third season.

According to The Complete Directory to Prime Time Network and Cable TV Shows, 1946–Present by Tim Brooks and Earle Marsh, ABC switched Broken Arrow from Tuesday nights — where it played with The Life and Legend of Wyatt Earp and Cheyenne — to Sundays midway through its second season, perhaps due to declining ratings. Unfortunately, that also marked the end of the series’ run on television. In total, the series ran for an impressive two seasons, each of which sees Jeffords and Cochise working together to keep the peace between two otherwise intolerant groups. Sure, sometimes things got out of hand, and there are plenty of bad actors on both sides who show up to cause some real trouble, but these blood brothers handle it together. Today, Broken Arrow is often forgotten in favor of its slightly older feature film counterpart, no doubt due to James Stewart’s exceptional performance.

Advertisement

‘Broken Arrow’ Is an Excellent Film, Even if the TV Version Was Lacking

But although Broken Arrow, the television series, was bold in its approach to racial discrepancies and issues, it couldn’t quite live up to the standard of the 1950 film. Budget aside, John Lupton was no James Stewart, and many criticized the actor’s portrayal as “not quite tough enough” (per The Baltimore Sun). Likewise, Ansara was deemed the same, and the pair, though earnest in their portrayals, have been tossed aside in favor of the more dynamic Chandler and Stewart duo. It’s not surprising either, since Broken Arrow, the film, does such a powerful job at tackling this conflict in 93 minutes, while the television series ran for 72 individual 30 minute installments. It’s not hard to see why some would prefer the shorter narrative with the better actors over the longer series with decent performances.

While not as famous as some of Stewart’s other iconic Westerns, such as How the West Was Won, The Man Who Shot Liberty Valance, and The Man from Laramie, nor as excellent as others like The Naked Spur or Winchester ’73, his 1950 feature was a major accomplishment. Its success led to a relatively successful television show, and proved to Hollywood that the life and perspective of Native American people also matter. They weren’t just villainous warriors set to raid your camp, nor were they one-dimensional caricatures who speak only when spoken to; they’re layered and complex, just like everyone else. Like the novel that inspired them, both Broken Arrow adaptations honored their historical figures well, and challenged us to strive for a better, more peaceful world.

Advertisement

Broken Arrow, the film, is available for streaming on Peacock in the U.S., while the television series is sadly not available on streaming.


Broken Arrow 1950 Film Poster
Advertisement

Broken Arrow (1950)


Release Date
Advertisement

August, 1950

Runtime

93 minutes

Advertisement

Director

Delmer Daves

Writers
Advertisement

Elliott Arnold, Albert Maltz, Michael Blankfort


Advertisement

Advertisement


Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Entertainment

MAFS’ Ryan de Nino Had a ‘Rough Go’ Before Death: Costar

Published

on

Tommy-John-Deaths-Update-GettyImages-52184668

Married at First Sight alum Ryan Ranellone is speaking out about the shocking death of his former season 2 castmate and friend Ryan de Nino.

“We stayed in contact the first couple of years after the show, but after some of the fallout with the TV show, unfortunately not a lot of people heard from him,” Ranellone, 39, exclusively told Us. “I just think he had kind of a rough go, the way things were portrayed and so forth.”

De Nino and ex-wife Jessica Castro met for the first time on their televised wedding day, which aired in 2015. The pair, however, split weeks later and Jessica, 42, filed a restraining order against de Nino. She claimed at the time that he allegedly threatened her and her family.

When the exes came together at the season 2 reunion, Jessica tossed de Nino a $100 bill because he “needed the money” more than she did. He took the cash and left the set without addressing the allegations.

Advertisement
Tommy-John-Deaths-Update-GettyImages-52184668


Related: Celebrity Deaths of 2026: ‘Heroes‘ Alum Hayden Panettiere and More

Hollywood mourned the deaths of some of its most legendary stars in 2026. In June, legendary music executive Clive Davis also died at age 94 following a hospitalization for an upper respiratory infection. The following month, G.R.L. member Lauren Bennett died at age 37, while Bonnie Tyler died at 75. Emergency!‘s Randolph Mantooth and Police […]

On a hot mic at the time, de Nino said, “She’s f***ing dead. When I get back to Brooklyn, she’s f***ing dead, this girl.” MAFS producers provided Jessica with a security team after de Nino’s alleged threat.

Advertisement

“After the show aired they had a reunion show, and he had gotten into an argument on TV with his — at that time, soon to be ex-wife. I guess he said something backstage, like he was gonna hurt [her]. He was pissed. He was really pissed off about whatever she said,” Ranellone told Us.

He continued, “I guess someone on the show heard [his comments], and then they had to report it to her and her family that he kind of made mention of some sort of violence. And then she put a restraining order against him.”

A source exclusively told Us that de Nino faced “a lot of negativity” after the show, which was “really a shame.”

“He was angry, and kind of got a bad rap,” the insider said. “It wasn’t a positive experience for him. I don’t think he could get away from it.”

Advertisement

The source shared that de Nino had “often said” before appearing on MAFS that he was set to be a cast member on Jersey Shore, but “got cold feet and decided not to do it.”

“And then he ended up on MAFS,” the insider recalled. “I think he struggled to find direction, especially after the show aired. He had a really hard time with all the comments online about him after the reunion. He was getting a ton of comments online, on social media, on Reddit. People talking about him and his family. He got paid $1,200 an episode for all that. It’s not even worth it in the end. All the negativity was very challenging.”

Years after season 2 aired, de Nino’s sister Melissa shared that he died. A cause of death was not disclosed in the Facebook announcement on August 11. After learning of de Nino’s death, Ranellone reached out to the family.

Jessica-Castro


Related: MAFS’ Jessica Castro Reveals When She Found Out Ex Died: ‘Never My Place’

Married at First Sight alum Jessica Castro is opening up about her decision to remain relatively quiet in the wake of her ex-husband Ryan de Nino’s sudden death at 40. After being asked whether Ryan died in the comments on her most recent Instagram post, Jessica, 42, responded to confirm his death. “Yes, unfortunately it’s […]

Advertisement

“Ryan was a good guy. He had a lot of good characteristics. He had a very strong, loyal friend base. People that would do a lot for him,” Ranellone said.

Ranellone, for his part, found love about a year after appearing on the show.

“I bought a home in East Northport [New York]. We’ve been together for 10 years. My business is great. Family’s good. You know, there’s no regrets in my life,” he said. “The show was a blessing for me in so many ways. I do not regret it whatsoever. And I’m happy for the people that do try to go forward with it. It’s just for those people that have a hard time with the public being up your ass. Either you lean into it or you run away from it. But thank God, thank God, everything is great on our end and we just keep moving forward.”

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Entertainment

Taylor Sheridan’s 6666 ‘Yellowstone’ Spin-Off Can Still Happen With a Formula Change

Published

on

03146271_poster_w780.jpg

Ever since it was first teased back in 2021, folks have wondered if Taylor Sheridan‘s Texas-based Yellowstone spin-off would ever happen. Deemed 6666 — as in, the historic Four Sixes Ranch — the proposed spin-off would have grown out of Jimmy Hurdstrom’s (Jefferson White) arc in Season 4. Sheridan had already bought the ranch, which made the whole thing feel like a done deal over at Paramount. Only, the Yellowstone Universe architect has revealed that the project was never going to happen.

Sorry Folks, Taylor Sheridan Says That ‘6666’ Ain’t Happening

After years of speculation as to how Sheridan might continue Jimmy’s story in this long-anticipated spin-off that could have been the modern equivalent of a show like Rawhide, the Yellowstone creator has officially closed the book on the project. Paramount had only offered a few select updates over the years, such as that 6666 had moved development from Paramount+ to the Paramount Network, but nothing concrete had ever been disclosed. Even Jefferson White didn’t know what was happening (or, in this case, not happening) behind the scenes. However, on a recent episode of the Rodeo Time podcast, Sheridan made it clear that 6666 was never a priority at all. When speaking about the idea of 6666, here is what Sheridan had to say:

Advertisement

“There’s never going to be one. I would never fictionalize that ranch. I would never do that because, at some point, what you have to do to sustain it… I’ve actually got on my computer all the scenes of Jimmy at the Four Sixes pulled out, right, and strung together — and it makes its own perfect little movie. Where you watch him go there as this misfit and leave, you know, a man and a respected cowboy.





















































Advertisement
Collider Exclusive · Taylor Sheridan Universe Quiz
Which Taylor Sheridan
Show Do You Belong In?

Yellowstone · Landman · Tulsa King · Mayor of Kingstown

Four worlds. All of them brutal, complicated, and built on power, loyalty, and the price of survival. Taylor Sheridan doesn’t write heroes — he writes people who do what they have to do and live with the cost. Ten questions will reveal which one of his worlds you were made for.

🤠Yellowstone

🛢️Landman

👑Tulsa King

Advertisement

⚖️Mayor of Kingstown

Advertisement

01

Where does your power come from?
In Sheridan’s world, everyone has leverage. The question is what kind.




Advertisement

02

Who do you put first, no matter what?
Loyalty in Sheridan’s universe is always absolute — and always costly.




Advertisement

03

Someone crosses a line. How do you respond?
Every Sheridan protagonist has a line. What matters is what happens after it’s crossed.




Advertisement

04

Where do you feel most in your element?
Sheridan’s worlds are as much about place as they are about people.




Advertisement

05

How do you feel about operating in the grey?
Nobody in a Sheridan show has clean hands. The question is how they carry the dirt.




Advertisement

06

What are you actually fighting to hold onto?
Every Sheridan character is fighting a war. The real question is what they’re defending.




Advertisement

07

How do you lead?
Authority in Sheridan’s world is never given — it’s established, maintained, and constantly tested.




Advertisement

08

Someone new arrives and tries to change how things work. Your reaction?
Every Sheridan show has an outsider disrupting an established order. Sometimes that outsider is you.




Advertisement

09

What has your position cost you?
Nobody gets to where these characters are without paying for it. The bill is always personal.




Advertisement

10

When it’s over, what do you want people to say?
Sheridan’s characters all know the ending is coming. The question is what they leave behind.




Advertisement
Sheridan Has Spoken
You Belong In…

The show that claimed the most of your answers is the world you were built for. If two tied, both are shown — you’re complicated enough to straddle two Sheridan universes.

Advertisement

🤠
Yellowstone

🛢️
Landman

👑
Tulsa King

⚖️
Mayor of Kingstown

Advertisement

You are a Dutton — or you might as well be. You understand that some things are worth protecting at any cost, and that the modern world’s indifference to history, to land, to legacy, is not something you’re willing to accept quietly. You lead from the front, you carry your family’s weight without complaint, and when someone threatens what’s yours, you don’t escalate — you finish it. You’re not cruel. But you are absolute. In Yellowstone’s world, that combination of ferocity and loyalty doesn’t make you a villain. It makes you the only thing standing between everything that matters and everyone who wants to take it.

You thrive in the chaos of high-stakes negotiation, where the money is enormous, the margins are thin, and the wrong word in the wrong room can cost everyone everything. You’re a fixer — the person called when a situation is already on fire and needs someone with the nerve to walk into it. West Texas oil country rewards exactly what you are: sharp, adaptable, unsentimental, and absolutely clear-eyed about what people want and what they’ll do to get it. You’re not naive enough to think this world is fair. You’re smart enough to be the one deciding who it’s fair to.

Advertisement

You are a Dwight Manfredi — someone who has served their time, paid their dues, and arrived somewhere unexpected with nothing but their reputation and their wits. You adapt without losing yourself. You build loyalty through respect rather than fear, though you’re not above reminding people that the two aren’t mutually exclusive. Tulsa King is for people who are still standing when everyone assumed they’d be finished — who find, in an unfamiliar place, that they’re more capable than the world gave them credit for. You don’t need a throne. You build one, wherever you happen to land.

You carry the weight of a system that is broken by design, and you do it anyway — because someone has to, and because you’re the only one positioned to do it without the whole thing collapsing. Mike McLusky’s world is for people who are comfortable operating where there are no good options, only less catastrophic ones. You speak every language: law enforcement, criminal, political, human. That fluency makes you invaluable and it makes you a target. You’ve made your peace with both. Mayor of Kingstown belongs to people who understand that keeping the peace is not the same as being at peace — and who do the job regardless.

Advertisement

Advertisement

For Sheridan, 6666 would almost be disrespectful to those who actually live and breathe the brand itself. “To me, if I were to try and make some kind of show about the Four Sixes, now I’m making up lives,” he added. “Now I have to invent a drama, right?” Because the Four Sixes is a working ranch, actual cowboys from Texas appeared as themselves on Yellowstone during its fourth and fifth seasons when the Dutton cowboys headed south. To tell a story about the historical ranch without including them would be impossible, meaning that Sheridan would have to invent new ones to fill the gap — and Jimmy and his wife Emily (Kathryn Kelly) wouldn’t have been enough.

Unlike Yellowstone, which was set on a fictional ranch in a fictional version of the real Paradise Valley, 6666 would require too much real-world connection to work. More than that, it would likely end up disrupting the flow of the actual historical Four Sixes ranch itself. The Chief Joseph Ranch in Darby, Montana — the actual location of the Yellowstone Dutton Ranch — was probably challenging enough to film at, considering that it too is an active cattle brand, but for the Texas operation, cowboying is everything. On one hand, it’s a shame that we’ll never see 6666 come to fruition, but on the other, we can understand Sheridan’s desire not to commercialize the livelihood of those who have made it what it is. “I’m very protective of the Sixes,” the cowboy-turned-filmmaker added. “And it’s a big responsibility to be the person who has to protect that brand.”

Sheridan’s Reasoning Makes Sense — but We’d Love a ‘6666’ Movie

Despite his thoughts on 6666 as a long-form television spin-off, Sheridan’s comments about Jimmy’s arc on Yellowstone are curious. Perhaps it would be fun to see his arc down south at the Four Sixes turned into a feature film, if not just to highlight what was arguably the best character arc in the show’s later seasons. Sure, it’s unlikely, but given how Paramount continues to boost the Dutton brand post-Kevin Costner, nothing is impossible. If Sheridan already has the Four Sixes arc all cut out and ready for a feature re-edit, let’s have at it!

Advertisement

As far as the Yellowstone Universe’s future in the great state of Texas, Beth Dutton (Kelly Reilly) and Rip Wheeler (Cole Hauser) have already migrated down south to the fictional Rio Paloma on Dutton Ranch. Although Sheridan isn’t as involved in this sequel series as he was in previous Dutton dramas, it seems like his narrative focus has shifted back to the Lone Star State in recent years. Aside from the Yellowstone brand, his shows Landman and Lioness have likewise found themselves settled in Texas (the latter spent time on the border during the second season), and Tulsa King took place just north in Oklahoma. If anyone knows Texas, it’s Taylor Sheridan.

Yellowstone is available for streaming on Peacock.


03146271_poster_w780.jpg
Advertisement


Advertisement

Release Date

2018 – 2024-00-00

Network
Advertisement

Paramount Network

Directors

Stephen Kay, Taylor Sheridan, Christina Alexandra Voros, Guy Ferland, John Dahl

Advertisement

Writers

John Coveny, Ian McCulloch

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement


Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Entertainment

LEGO Reveals ‘Batman Returns’ Batmobile With Transforming Batmissile

Published

on

LEGO Reveals ‘Batman Returns’ Batmobile With Transforming Batmissile

The LEGO Group is heading back to Tim Burton’s Gotham City with a massive new Batmobile set inspired by Michael Keaton’s Dark Knight.

LEGO has officially unveiled the LEGO DC Batman: Batman Returns Batmobile, a 2,269-piece collector set recreating the iconic vehicle from the 1992 film Batman Returns. It marks the first time the movie’s specific version of the Batmobile has been recreated as a full LEGO brick model.

Designed for adult collectors, the new Batmobile measures more than 17 inches long, 6.5 inches wide and four inches tall. The build recreates the vehicle’s elongated body, rear jet turbine, opening canopy and detailed cockpit. LEGO has also hidden six Easter eggs throughout the model, including The Penguin’s tracking device.

The biggest feature, however, comes directly from one of Batman Returns’ most memorable Batmobile sequences.

Advertisement

Lego Batman

At the press of a button, the sides of the LEGO Batmobile separate using a newly designed lift-arm mechanism to reveal the Batmissile hidden inside. The transformation recreates Batman’s escape vehicle from the movie and allows collectors to display the finished model in either its standard Batmobile configuration or its slimmer Batmissile form.

LEGO developed three new elements specifically for the set, including a new Batman minifigure cowl. The set also comes with an exclusive Michael Keaton-inspired Batman minifigure featuring a newly molded cape and its own display stand bearing the Batman Returns logo.

The LEGO DC Batman: Batman Returns Batmobile, set #76355, will be available to LEGO Insiders beginning September 1, 2026, before receiving its full release on September 4, 2026. The set will retail for $229.99 in the United States.

Advertisement

More than three decades after Batman Returns hit theaters, Keaton’s Batmobile remains one of the most recognizable vehicles in superhero movie history, and LEGO’s newest release gives fans one of its most detailed brick-built versions yet.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2025