“Summer House” star West Wilson is finally addressing the growing drama surrounding his relationship with Amanda Batula, and he’s not holding back. 

After rumors swirled about an overlap with his ex, Ciara Miller, online backlash intensified, even leading to Batula’s phone number being leaked. 

Now, Wilson is setting the record straight on the timeline, admitting his actions have hurt people close to him, and preparing to confront the situation directly as tensions continue to build ahead of the reunion.

West Wilson Denies Timeline Rumors In Amanda Batula Drama

West Wilson is pushing back against speculation that his relationship with Batula overlapped with his past romance with her close friend Miller.

Speaking on an episode of his “Show Me Something” podcast with co-host Sophie Cunningham, he made it clear that the timeline circulating online is inaccurate. 

“There was no overlap,” he said, shutting down theories that have been circulating among fans. 

He added, “I know there’s a thousand different theories on the internet right now, but that is one thing that for sure did not happen. Everyone was single.”

Wilson explained that his connection with Batula didn’t immediately turn serious. Instead, he noted that things only began to feel more meaningful earlier this year. 

According to him, they “realized things were maybe a little bit serious in February.” 

Wilson Admits Backlash Has Taken Toll On Amanda Batula

West Wilson also acknowledged that the public reaction has been intense, particularly for Batula. 

He revealed that she has been dealing with the harshest consequences of the situation, saying she has taken the “brunt” of the backlash. 

According to the reality TV star, things escalated to a troubling level when her personal information was exposed. 

He shared that the TV personality’s phone number had been leaked, leading to a wave of negative messages directed at her. 

At the same time, Wilson admitted that the fallout has weighed on him emotionally. Reflecting on the impact of his actions, he said, “The hardest part I think with this whole situation is, you know, my actions have hurt people that I care about.”

With tensions still high, he noted that he plans to address everything directly, including offering apologies and clearing up misinformation during the upcoming reunion.

Although Wilson intended to clear things up with his explanation, it only made things worse, as many fans took turns slamming him in the comments section.

“This is not about overlap. It’s about character— booking up with an ex’s bFF and hooking up with your guy friends wife! What are you confused about?” one person wrote.

Another with similar thoughts added, “I don’t think NO ONE cares about an overlap, timeline, changing numbers, etc! It should HAVE NEVER HAPPENED!!!” 

A third fan also noted, “It doesn’t matter if everyone was single you still don’t mess with a friend’s ex which you both did. They have a right to be hurt by that for sure and you haven’t shown any loyalty.”

Other fans also slammed Batula for getting involved with her BFF’s ex, noting that she deserved all the hate she was getting. 

“If you and Amanda think you did nothing wrong then that’s crazy. And really it’s more her than you. Ciara uplifted her for years and she pays her back with this,” one angry person commented.

Wilson Faces Growing Tension As Ciara Miller Speaks Out

West Wilson’s comments come as Ciara Miller shares her own perspective on the situation. 

Miller has been preparing for the “Summer House” reunion and hinted that her mindset has shifted compared to previous appearances. 

While she isn’t focused on making a dramatic statement with her outfit, she admitted she is approaching the event differently. 

She also opened up about how the situation has affected her emotionally, particularly because it has played out so publicly. 

“It’s one thing to experience hurt behind closed doors; to experience it so publicly is like another layer, and then to have to see what you thought was your life still play out in season 10. It’s a major mindf-ck,” she told Glamour.

Miller further reflected on trusting her instincts, saying, “Just know when something’s weird in your gut, there’s a reason,” while also adding, “What’s done in the dark always comes to light.”

Batula Breaks Her Silence On The Drama Involving Miller And West Wilson

Amid the messy drama involving her and Ciara Miller, Amanda Batula has also addressed her involvement with Wilson, acknowledging the fallout and emotional weight of the situation. 

As The Blast reported, after confirming her romance with the 31-year-old, Batula admitted that it was never her and Wilson’s intention to purposely hide anything, explaining they needed time to process their feelings due to the complicated relationship dynamics.

She added, “We also recognize that this has had an impact beyond just us and never wanted our actions to cause any hurt.”  

Addressing the backlash more personally, Batula later shared that the situation still weighed heavily on her, noting that she was trying to return to some sense of normalcy without ignoring what happened.

Based on a Graham Greene short story and explicitly designed to lift the public’s spirits as World War II wound on and Brits feared Nazi infiltrators, the British World War II film Went the Day Well? could easily be a stuffy time capsule of a film in 2026. However, even today, it’s still a bracing war film that clearly lived past its sell-by date to inspire filmmakers from Sam Peckinpah and Edgar Wright to Quentin Tarantino.

Director Alberto Cavalcanti carefully paints bucolic daily life in a quiet English village before the peace is shattered by a Nazi vanguard — and the film turns into a bloody siege thriller, with everyday folks taking up arms to defend their homes. Boasting an incredible lineup of British screen greats and surprisingly brutal action, Went the Day Well? is well worth a look in 2026, whether as a sort of Inglourious Basterds prototype or one of the best WWII films of all time in its own right.

‘Went the Day Well?’ Is the Kind of Nazi-Killing Thriller the Public Needed During WWII

Image via Rialto Pictures/StudioCanal

Went the Day Well? makes its intentions clear almost from frame one, with a gravedigger laying out the stakes for the audience and promising that no matter the threat, there is Nazi killing to come. “They wanted England, these Jerries did,” says the film’s narrator as he points to a gravestone with a German name on it. “And this is the only bit they got.”

The sun shines, the milk is delivered, and prim English manners are on full display when a squadron of “British” soldiers arrive in the countryside town of Bramley End and are welcomed with open arms. Hints abound that all is not well. In a tense pub scene before the action begins, a kindly old barmaid offers a toast to the undercover Germans, jokingly referring to them as foreigners and cheering, “Down with Hitler!” as the men show their discomfort with some extremely subtle facial expressions. Cavalcanti manages a level of tension in sequences like these that will remind viewers of Tarantino’s legendary pub standoff some 70 years later.

The Nazi soldiers eventually take the village hostage, with efforts to warn the outside Allied forces frustrated. And things come to a boil when kindly postmistress Mrs. Collins convinces one of the Germans that she’s a sympathizer, then blinds him with the very cup of sugar she’s about to serve before sinking an axe into him in a spectacularly tense and cathartic scene. From this point forward, Went the Day Well?‘s lineage through Inglourious Basterds and even Hot Fuzz‘s country village siege climax becomes clear.

The innocent in Went the Day Well? suffer remarkably cruel fates for a film of its time — especially for one designed to lift the country’s spirits. A young boy is shot through the leg, the aforementioned barmaid is bayoneted, and another village woman literally throws herself on a grenade to save the children in her charge. It was an “orgy of shockingly blunt, matter-of-fact violence” for the time, according to British film critic Tom Huddleston.

Cavalcanti stages several thrilling set pieces as the villagers strike back, and the gorgeous black and white cinematography, particularly in a tense forest sequence, recalls some of the dark fairy-tale beauty of Night of the Hunter, which wouldn’t release for more than a decade. Throughout its brief running time, the mannered, extremely proper acting style of 1940s Britain clashes wonderfully with the brutal violence and jingoistic attitude toward the Nazi invaders.

And the climactic scene with the village women taking sniper shots at fleeing Germans from church windows offers a similar giddy thrill to Tarantino’s vengeance-fueled set pieces in Inglourious Basterds and Django Unchained, and Went the Day Well? ends as it began: With the Nazis underneath the ground and the plucky British townsfolk returning to business as usual.

Related

Quentin Tarantino’s WWII Revenge Fantasy Masterpiece Pulls Right From This ’40s Thriller

Would anybody like a glass of milk?

Advertisement

‘Went the Day Well?’ Is a Breezy Blast — And Easy to Watch Today

Image via Rialto Pictures/StudioCanal

Advertisement

The Guardian’s Phillip French later called Went the Day Well? the single “best, most ferocious picture of the war years,” and its pure lizard-brain focus on revenge and giving the Nazis what-for remains a dubious joy to this day.

As a piece of propaganda by Britain’s wartime Ministry of Information, it served its purpose well, both warning of Nazi “fifth columnists” and boosting viewers’ morale. But the criminally under-seen Went the Day Well? also left a lasting imprint on pop entertainment, and it can still be streamed on Prime Video and for free on the Internet Archive. At a slim 88 minutes, it’s an easy bet for war film enthusiasts — and it still packs a surprising punch.

Advertisement

Advertisement

Release Date

December 7, 1942

Runtime

88 minutes

Advertisement

Director

Alberto Cavalcanti

Advertisement

Writers

Angus MacPhail, Diana Morgan

Producers

Advertisement

Michael Balcon

Advertisement

• 
• 

  Leslie Banks

  Oliver Wilsford

  Advertisement
• 
• 

  Basil Sydney

  Major Hammond / Kommandant Orlter

Advertisement

Advertisement

For a while there, Silo felt basically untouchable on Apple TV. The show built a loyal audience, kept people theorizing between episodes, and turned its huge underground mystery into one of the platform’s most reliable conversation starters. That’s why its latest chart slide stands out. It’s not that the series has disappeared overnight, but compared to where it usually sits in Apple’s ecosystem, Silo is clearly having a quieter moment.

FlixPatrol’s latest figures show Silo sitting outside the top tier of Apple TV’s current worldwide attention cycle, with the title page showing it at No. 15 in recent Apple TV rankings and its current chart footprint looking much lighter than the show’s previous highs. In individual country charts, it’s still showing up, but it’s no longer dominating the way it did during its hotter runs.

That doesn’t mean the appetite has vanished. If anything, it probably says more about how crowded Apple TV is getting at the moment, with titles like Your Friends & Neighbors and Monarch: Legacy of Monsters currently pulling more immediate attention. Still, when you’re talking about a series led by Rebecca Ferguson and built around one of TV’s best dystopian hooks, even a temporary chart cool-down is worth clocking. Silo has already proven it can bounce back before, and this probably won’t be the last time it claws its way up again.

How Good Is ‘Silo’?

Image via Apple TV+

Collider’s Tania Hussain awarded the second season an 8/10, praising its “uniquely immersive environment” and “razor-sharp writing,” adding that “by grounding its Orwellian elements into tense yet relatable human struggles, Silo continues to surpass the genre… emerging as a masterful exploration of isolation and survival through Ferguson’s nuanced portrayal.” She wrote:

“With its 10 episodes this season, the Silo world is truly expanding and the supporting performances amplify so much of the stakes. Exemplifying a sad and almost heartwrenching portrayal of loneliness with a childlike wonder, Steve Zahn is at his absolute best in a barren playground where his character, Solo, creates the rules. It’s the chemistry he shares with Ferguson that creates a dynamic sort of interplay that contrasts her serious demeanor with a spirited and lively approach. He is every bit a compelling counterpart to Juliette, and one we see most terrifically evolve across the series.”

Silo Seasons 1 and 2 are streaming now on Apple TV, while Season 3 is awaiting release. Stay tuned to Collider for more streaming updates.

Advertisement

Advertisement

Release Date

May 5, 2023

Showrunner

Advertisement

Graham Yost

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Taylor Frankie Paul is making it clear she’s not stepping away from the spotlight even as controversy continues to follow her. 

The reality TV star and MomTok influencer is pushing back against calls to go offline, choosing instead to document her struggles in real time. 

With domestic violence investigations, a canceled TV opportunity, and ongoing scrutiny tied to her relationship with ex Dakota Mortensen, Paul is now leaning into the chaos rather than hiding from it.

Taylor Frankie Paul isn’t interested in logging off social media, despite growing pressure from critics who believe she should take a step back.

After a TikTok fan advised her to “Do your healing off of social media,” Paul responded directly, making her stance unmistakably clear. 

Taking to her Instagram Stories, she shared a screenshot of the fan’s comment alongside the reply, “That sounds like the reasonable answer, however I will be doing the opposite. I’ll continue sharing on social media showing how ugly healing truly can be.”

For Paul, posting content is more than just staying visible, it’s part of how she processes everything happening around her. 

She explained, “Making and editing videos is my way of processing just like people like to write into a journal.. this is my way and I choose to share it.”

She also acknowledged that her approach might not work for everyone, adding, “Saying this with love, most people would need to get off and so understandable [bandaged heart emoji] I’m not most.”

Paul Opens Up About ‘Ugly’ Healing Amid Legal Drama

Taylor Frankie Paul has been upfront about the emotional toll of the past few months, describing her situation as something deeply overwhelming.

A day before the response, the 31-year-old shared a post on Instagram, revealing she planned to document “the ugly parts of what healing actually looks like,” giving followers a closer look at what she’s going through behind the scenes. 

Paul also described the backlash and attention as a “public atrocity” she wouldn’t wish “upon my worst enemy.” Her legal situation has been a major part of that stress. 

The TV personality referenced a turning point when she learned charges would not be pursued against her, saying, “God undoubtedly had a hand in this because after waiting 7 weeks on the 7th day EXACTLY I received the call all charges dropped.”

The investigations stemmed from reported domestic disputes involving her ex, Mortensen, with whom she shares a young son. 

While the case brought significant scrutiny, prosecutors ultimately chose not to move forward.

Taylor Frankie Paul’s Reality TV Setback Adds To Ongoing Turmoil

Paul’s personal challenges have also spilled into her professional life, affecting major opportunities. 

She had been set to appear on season 22 of “The Bachelorette,” but the project was abruptly canceled just days before its scheduled premiere. The decision came after footage surfaced showing a past altercation involving Mortensen.

In response to the situation, a spokesperson stated per PEOPLE, “In light of the newly released video just surfaced today, we have made the decision to not move forward with the new season of The Bachelorette at this time, and our focus is on supporting the family.”

Despite the setback, Paul has expressed a desire to rebuild and focus on herself. In her Instagram post, she shared that she’s returning to basics, writing, “We’re working on eating, movement, rest, and retraining the nervous system.”

At the same time, she made it clear that her journey will remain public. “I’ll be sharing the process, because if my worst is shared better bet I’ll share the rebuilding too,” she said.

Paul Opens Up About The Bad Effects Of Her Domestic Violence Case

Taylor Frankie Paul recently opened up in raw detail about what she called the “ugly parts” of healing after her domestic violence case, sharing an emotional and deeply personal message with fans. 

As The Blast reported, she described the aftermath as overwhelming, writing, “I wouldn’t wish this upon my worst enemy,” while reflecting on the intense public scrutiny and personal pain she endured.   

Paul added that the experience felt like “a certain living hell I couldn’t find my way out of,” revealing how trapped and broken she felt during the ordeal.  

She also painted a vivid picture of her emotional state, saying it was like “someone witnessed me bleeding out and poured salt all over me.” 

Despite that, Paul expressed gratitude for surviving the situation, saying she felt “forever freed,” even if she was “barely” holding on.  

Dakota Mortensen Admits Regret Over Difficult Cycle With Taylor Frankie Paul

Days before Paul’s revelation, Mortensen broke his silence on the legal drama, describing their relationship as a “difficult cycle” he wished he had left sooner. 

According to The Blast, he admitted, “I regret not stepping away from a difficult cycle sooner,” reflecting on the toxic nature of their on-and-off relationship.   

Mortensen explained that he had since taken time away from the chaos, adding that his focus was now “on my son and creating a stable, healthy environment.”   

He also pushed back against public narratives, saying, “I don’t agree with how this situation has been portrayed publicly,” arguing it “does not reflect the full context” or its impact on him and their child.   

He acknowledged his own role in the situation, saying he was taking accountability and prioritizing growth, while stepping away from the spotlight to focus on healing.

After such a long wait, Euphoria coming back was always going to be a moment. The real question was whether the show would still have the same pull after four years away. Turns out that answer is very much yes. HBO’s drama returned on April 12, 2026, and within days it had climbed right to the top of HBO Max’s worldwide chart, overtaking The Pitt in the process. That’s a pretty loud comeback.

FlixPatrol’s chart for April 17 shows Euphoria at No. 1 on HBO Max worldwide, ahead of The Pitt, while the April 18 chart has the two shows flipped again with The Pitt at No. 1 and Euphoria at No. 2. Either way, the bigger point is clear: the series came back swinging and immediately re-entered the platform’s top tier.

That tracks with the scale of the return. Season 3 premiered four years after the previous run and pushes the story forward with a major time jump, bringing Zendaya, Sydney Sweeney, Hunter Schafer, Jacob Elordi, and more back into the chaos. Love it or hate it, Euphoria has never exactly done subtle, and that shock-factor reputation is part of why the comeback landed so hard.

Is ‘Euphoria’ Worth Watching?

Collider’s review stated that Euphoria Season 3 still delivers the things the show is known for, but it no longer feels like it has much purpose. Even with the five-year time jump and an older version of these characters, the series does not seem to have grown in any meaningful way. According to the review, it falls back on the same formula of striking visuals, strong performances, and nonstop ugliness, but this time without much depth behind it.

“The fact that these characters were in high school for the first two seasons made all of Euphoria‘s risqué moments that much more shocking and uncomfortable, but in a way, it also sort of felt like the whole point. The show’s five-year time jump inherently strips it of its central thesis of ‘look at all the adult things kids have to deal with nowadays,’ making it difficult to pinpoint why Season 3 exists at all. Is it beautifully shot? Yes. Does it feature excellent performances? Many. Does it have anything interesting to say? It doesn’t, really — in fact, it amounts to a whole lot of well-crafted, weakly-written nothing.”

Euphoria is streaming now.

Advertisement

Advertisement

Release Date

2019 – 2026-00-00

Network

Advertisement

HBO

Showrunner

Sam Levinson

Advertisement

Directors

Jennifer Morrison, Augustine Frizzell

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

There’s a reason some shows become background noise, and others become ritual. NCIS, now in its 23rd season, has managed to be both. It’s a comfort watch, a character drama, a crime procedural, and, somehow, still a ratings and streaming force in an era where even younger, louder franchises burn out fast. On Paramount+, where legacy library viewing drives real value, few titles have proved as durable.

That durability — and consistent ratings, according to FlixPatrol — is the result of a series built to evolve without losing its center. Cast members leave as others step in; people like Gibbs exit as Alden Parker arrives. NCIS has managed, over the years, to get the rhythms right and keep its audience.

‘NCIS’ Built a Formula That Still Works

Image via CBS

If by now, viewers don’t know about NCIS, a team of agents with the Naval Criminal Investigative Service investigates crimes tied to the Navy and Marine Corps, such as murders, espionage, terrorism, cybercrime, and internal corruption. Some cases are ripped from the pages of military bureaucracy; others edge toward political thriller territory. Despite similar shows doing the same, what keeps NCIS alive after more than two decades isn’t the cases alone.

Mark Harmon’s Gibbs gave the show its steel as Michael Weatherly’s DiNozzo brought swagger and comic timing. Pauley Perrette’s Abby made forensic science feel punk while David McCallum gave the series soul. Then there were later additions that didn’t imitate what came before, but added a different flair to the series. For instance, Gary Cole wisely didn’t play Parker as Gibbs 2.0. Wilmer Valderrama, Katrina Law, Sean Murray, Brian Dietzen, Diona Reasonover — the current team works because the show lets new rhythms form.

NCIS has always understood something many procedurals miss, which is that formula only works when it has texture. That’s why the show makes room for grief, running jokes, office rituals, old wounds, even absurd little signatures like Gibbs’ head slaps and those famous black-and-white “phoof” transitions. Tends to stick.

Where To Start With ‘NCIS’ if You’ve Never Watched

Image via Cliff Lipson / © CBS / courtesy everett collection

Twenty-three seasons can look intimidating, but one would beg to differ. Start at the beginning if you want the full Gibbs era; early NCIS has a crackling energy, and seasons two through nine are widely considered a golden run for good reason. Episodes like “Kill Ari,” “Shiva,” and “Twilight” still hit just right.

Alternatively, you can start with season 19 and the Parker era because it functions, in many ways, as a soft reset, and you’ll catch up easily. A secret third option is to do what many viewers do (i.e., drop into standout episodes and let the show pull you along).

There’s also a misconception that NCIS is only for procedural devotees or older broadcast loyalists, which also undersells what the show does well. At its best, this is an ensemble drama disguised as a case-of-the-week machine. The investigations pull you in, and the relationships keep you around. Frankly, there’s pleasure in watching a show so comfortable in its own skin.