Entertainment
Emerald Fennell’s ‘Wuthering Heights’ Removes a Critical Piece of the Original Novel That Hurts the Movie
Editor’s note: The following contains spoilers for ‘Wuthering Heights.’An adaptation has no obligation to honor its source material, but it does need to ensure that any changes made to the original text are justified. Emerald Fennell crafted a jarring new version of Emily Brontë’s beloved classic Wuthering Heights that only depicts half of the story in the novel. The romance between Catherine Earnshaw (Margot Robbie) and Heathcliff (Jacob Elordi) that Fennell focuses on only constitutes the first half of the book, with the second part centered on their respective children. While previous versions of Wuthering Heights have also ignored the second half of the novel, Fennell’s willingness to brush over the younger characters removes the haunting depiction of generational trauma that makes the material so haunting. Without seeing how the unrequited love between Catherine and Heathcliff manifests, Fennell’s Wuthering Heights is a standard period romance that lacks bite.
Fennell’s Wuthering Heights immediately announces its disregard for the source material because the character of Hindley Earnshaw, Catherine’s brother, is removed entirely. Hindley is not only a bully who subjects Heathcliff to physical and emotional torment, but the target of vengeance. It’s by treating Hindley’s son, Hareton, as an uneducated servant that Heathcliff subjects the descendant of the Earnshaw family to the same misery that he experienced. Fennell’s film instead uses Cathy’s father, Mr. Earnshaw (Martin Clunes), to fulfill the role of Heathcliff’s tormenter, but he isn’t a major factor in the film once she is wedded to Edgar Linton (Shazad Latif). While these decisions may have been for the sake of simplifying the text, character motivations become more confusing once their motivations are made more foggy.
Emerald Fennell Only Told Half of ‘Wuthering Heights’
Wuthering Heights is an epic tragedy because Heathcliff and Catherine are never allowed to be intimate with one another, as they each become locked in unexpected marriages. The importance of Catherine’s marriage to Edgar and Heathcliff’s wedding with Isabella (Alison Oliver) is to show how they are locked away from each other by societal rules; despite seemingly being given fulfilling relationships with considerable wealth, Catherine and Heathcliff are miserable because they have loved one another since childhood. Taking out the second generation of characters means that Wuthering Heights doesn’t show the ramifications of the separation. Instead, Fennell seems to stage the drama as a series of love triangles. Cathy only marries Edgar because of Heathcliff’s departure, which is prompted by a deception on the part of her maid, Nelly Dean (Hong Chau). Likewise, Heathcliff marries Isabella as an opportunity to torment Cathy. However, Fennell’s film doesn’t actually create any suspense because Catherine and Heathcliff are intimate, meaning that their respective marriages didn’t suppress their affections for one another.
The inclusion of the second generation of characters is necessary in creating dramatic irony because the novel shows how each of the children comes to suffer as a result of their parents’ sins. Heathcliff’s son, Linton, does not have any of his father’s strength and thus never gets to enjoy the pleasures of his father’s fortune; Catherine’s daughter, Catherine Linton, is born when her mother dies in childbirth, and is denied knowledge of her heritage by her father, Edgar. The eventual tragic love story that emerges between Linton and Cathy is meant to be a dark mirror to that of their parents, as it is Linton who dies of sickness, and Cathy who is left to marry another. Even the other versions of Wuthering Heights that only adapted half the book, such as the 1939 masterpiece directed by the great William Wyler, were able to show the loneliness Heathcliff feels when he’s haunted by the ghosts of the past. Fennell’s version, despite being much longer, doesn’t even include the flashes forward to the future, as it instead ends with a montage of a younger Catherine (Charlotte Mellington) and Heathcliff (Owen Cooper).
‘Wuthering Heights’ Doesn’t Have a Clear Motivation for Heathcliff
That Hindley, and by extension, Hareton, are not included means that there’s not a significant reason why Heathcliff returns to seek revenge after acquiring a fortune. Heathcliff’s treatment of Hareton, whom he values less than his own son, would have mirrored how he himself was treated by Mr. Earnshaw in comparison to Hindley. To see Heathcliff’s failures as a parent is important because he is simultaneously unable to protect his own child and faces the ultimate humiliation when Catherine’s daughter falls in love with Hareton, whom he despises. As a result, Elordi’s version of Heathcliff is simply a petty, petulant spurned lover whose separation with Catherine all comes down to a misinterpretation. It not only denies agency to both Catherine and Heathcliff, but also makes the Lintons into less interesting characters; Fennell only sees Edgar as a villain, and depicts Isabella as being vapid and childish.
Although Fennell has proven to be a polarizing figure because of her provocative stylistic choices, Wuthering Heights isn’t all that shocking because it distills a complex story of psychosexual, incestuous desire into a standard weepie. There was an opportunity to make a new version of Wuthering Heights that became the definitive adaptation, as it had the chance to include the knottier themes of the second half of the book that weren’t seen in the cinematic versions in 1939, 1970, 1992, and 2011. That so much of Brontë’s prose was ignored doesn’t just make Wuthering Heights an unfaithful adaptation, but turns it into a shallow, incomplete film in its own right. Unlike the way the romance should have been depicted, Fennell’s Wuthering Heights only skims the surface.
Wuthering Heights is now playing in theaters.
- Release Date
-
February 13, 2026
- Runtime
-
136 Minutes
- Director
-
Emerald Fennell
- Writers
-
Emerald Fennell, Emily Brontë
- Producers
-
Margot Robbie, Tom Ackerley, Emerald Fennell, Josey McNamara
Entertainment
William Shatner had to have surgery after wild horse accident sent him flying: 'I'm not a young stuntman anymore'
:max_bytes(150000):strip_icc():format(jpeg)/William-Shatner-031226-d8606f36b24f4b269e12763e911a7355.jpg)
The “Star Trek” legend, who turns 95 later this month, fell off his horse late last year.
Entertainment
Age of Attraction Couples Status Check: Who Is Together?
Age of Attraction sparked several romantic connections — but which couples are still dating and who has broken up?
The new dating show, which premiered in March 2026, is hosted by real-life couple Nick Viall and Natalie Joy, who have their own 18-year age gap. According to the official synopsis, “Age is thrown out the window when singles search for their soulmates, but will the years come between them?”
Divided into three parts, the first batch of episodes showed the initial connections that were formed before individual couples made promises to each other. After a visit to the Promise Room, each couple were finally able to discuss their age gap — and decide if they wanted to keep exploring their chemistry.
Age of Attraction zeroed in on six couples who moved into the same apartment building after making a commitment. They then had to weather new challenges as their new normal set in, which led to one shocking split.
Later in the season, family members will visit each couple to give their opinions on each match. They will then make a decision about whether they want to pursue a future together or if their age differences create too much of an issue.
Scroll down to find out whether your favorite Age of Attraction couple is still together:
John and Theresa

The first couple to form a connection on the show — who have a 27-year age gap — are still together halfway through the season.
Vanessa and Logan

Despite facing challenges in their 20-year age gap after moving in together on the show, Vanessa and Logan are still together.
Chris and Leah

The pair, who are 15 years apart, have continued to fight for their romance when the first part of season 1 came to an end.
Derrick and Pfeifer

Pfeifer, who was 23 when filming, and Derrick, who was 43, are still discussing their future together on the show.
Libby and Andrew

After finding out about their 16-year age gap, Libby and Andrew decided to give their connection a chance — and they are still an item by the end of part 1.
Vanelle and Jorge

The duo, who have a 33-year age gap, faced many issues including Jorge revealing he has kids, their different thoughts on Vanelle’s celibacy and an offscreen fight that turned into a breakup in episode 5.
Entertainment
Katherine Heigl Responds To Critics Over Mar-a-Lago Event
Katherine Heigl is speaking out after facing backlash for attending a charity event at Mar-a-Lago.
The actress says the criticism misses the real purpose of the evening, which raised millions for an animal rescue organization.
As online debate intensified, Heigl did not stay silent, offering a passionate defense of her actions and her long-standing advocacy for animals.
Katherine Heigl Explains Why She Attended The Event

Heigl addressed the controversy directly after her appearance at the Wine, Women & Shoes fundraiser held at Mar a Lago in Palm Beach, Florida.
The actress explained that the event was centered on helping animals, a cause she has supported for years through her charitable work.
“Animals don’t vote,” Heigl said in a statement to JustJared. “The only room they don’t like is the euthanasia room at a shelter. They are completely at the mercy of us, and they have no voice of their own.”
She emphasized that the focus of the event had nothing to do with politics and everything to do with advocacy.
“This event was about animal advocacy — something that has always been deeply personal to me,” Heigl continued. “Anyone who knows me knows that protecting animals is one of my greatest passions. My mother, Nancy, and I have spent years advocating for animals through the Jason Heigl Foundation. As a society, we should all come together to protect the voiceless and the innocent. This should not be a polarizing issue.”
Fundraiser Raises Millions For Animal Rescue

While the online debate gained attention, organizers highlighted the success of the three-day charity gathering.
According to the event’s hosts, the fundraiser generated $5.5 million in support of Big Dog Ranch Rescue, the largest no-kill dog rescue organization in the United States.
Founder Lauree Simmons praised the turnout and the impact of the event.
“This year was a record-breaking success and boosted awareness for Big Dog Ranch Rescue,” Simmons said. “It was a heartwarming display of community spirit, uniting style enthusiasts and animal advocates for a truly monumental cause.”
The gathering also marked Katherine Heigl’s first red carpet appearance in two years, drawing attention from both supporters and critics online.
Katherine Heigl Fires Back At Social Media Criticism

Not everyone responded positively to Heigl’s attendance. Some social media users questioned her decision to appear at the event’s location.
Following Heigl’s use of the phrase “animals don’t vote,” one Instagram user pushed back.
“No, but if they did they would have better judgement than you!” the commenter wrote.
Heigl responded with a lengthy reply challenging the focus of the criticism.
She asked the commenter, “Just curious…what do you do that really matters…do you think comments on an instagram post matter to animals who have had humans pour gasoline on them and set them on fire? Who have had humans vote conservative or liberal but have been left to starve and suffer? Seriously…I’m very curious what you truly think matters to the voiceless and innocent…actions or just instagram posturing?”
Her response quickly circulated online, fueling further discussion around the event.
Katherine Heigl Challenges Critics To Take Action

Another commenter suggested that the actress should support animal rescues that do not hold events at the same venue.
“There are so many amazing rescues to align yourself with that aren’t hosting events there — and so many ways to get involved that aren’t putting on a dress and drinking cocktails masquerading as helping,” the user wrote.
Heigl again pushed back, questioning whether critics had contributed to similar causes themselves.
“How are you so sure about that…have you been to any?” Heigl replied. “Have you donated a significant part of your income to anything? Anything you claim to care so much about? Have you done anything more than comment on what someone else is doing or not doing to your standard? Just curious…”
Actress Urges People To Focus On Helping Animals

Despite the criticism, Katherine Heigl also received supportive messages from some followers who defended her decision to attend the fundraiser.
One commenter wrote alongside several clapping emojis, “She made a choice.”
Heigl responded in similar fashion to the supportive remark.
“Yes I did,” she replied.
The actress concluded by urging people to focus less on online debates and more on taking meaningful action to help causes they care about.
When a commenter asked who Heigl was, she responded by writing, “Do you care about animals? If so donate! Time! Money! Attention! Your voice! It doesn’t matter who I am only what I do. The same goes for you! Animals might not be your thing but I bet you care deeply about something that matters! Do your part! Don’t waste your time scrolling and making comments!”
Several more negative comments followed, but Heigl took the time to respond to each one.
For her, the message was simple. Regardless of the location or controversy, the true goal was helping animals who cannot advocate for themselves.
Entertainment
Kurt Russell kicked Elvis in the shin as a child in his very first movie: 'Everybody was a little bit worried'
:max_bytes(150000):strip_icc():format(jpeg)/Kurt-Russell-Elvis-Presley-031226-8eda1e52ae6941a7ba1d0df8b728d253.jpg)
The actor was 11 when he starred alongside the King of Rock ’n’ Roll in the 1963 musical “It Happened at the World’s Fair.”
Entertainment
13 Boutique-Worthy Floral Blouses to Elevate Your Spring Style
Us Weekly has affiliate partnerships. We receive compensation when you click on a link and make a purchase. Learn more!
A gorgeous floral blouse can pull an entire outfit together in seconds, but finding one that doesn’t look cheap or overly trendy gets harder every spring. Too many options lean juvenile or feel paper thin the moment you touch them. It’s why we went on the hunt for some great alternatives.
The good news is you don’t need to spend boutique-level prices to get that luxe look. We found 13 fashionable floral spring blouses that look and feel expensive, despite starting at just $15. Our favorites are designed with rich prints, quality fabrics and flattering cuts that are ideal for women over 40 . . . without the markup. Rest assured, these are the kinds of tops that get compliments at brunch, church and more.
13 Boutique-Worthy Floral Blouses to Elevate Spring Wardrobes
1. Our Favorite: The eyelet cutouts and crochet lace embroidery give this long-sleeve blouse real texture and dimension. It looks like something you’d find at your local boutique.
2. Bold Pattern: Love the Lilly Pulitzer look but not the price? This cap-sleeve blouse captures that same colorful floral energy with the addition of ruffle sleeves and a boho feel.
3. Office-Ready: Tired of choosing between boring office blouses and florals tops you actually want to wear? This flowy tunic blouse with three-quarter sleeves is elegant enough for meetings.
4. Pop of Color: Lantern long sleeves and a button-up design give this colorful chiffon blouse a boho-meets-dressy feel. The bold floral print is a real mood lifter.
5. Pastel Perfection: Slip on this pink puff-sleeve top for Easter brunch or a spring baby shower. The smocked detail cinches just right, and the loose babydoll fit keeps you comfortable all day.
6. Very Versatile: Need one top that works for the office and dinner plans? This green floral V-neck transitions easily between work and weekend plans due to the chiffon-like fabric, flutter sleeves and more.
7. Boho Beauty: Layer this boho floral blouse with your favorite denim jacket on a cool spring morning. The drawstring detail and flowy fit make it a go-to weekend top.
8. Luxe Lace: Boring basics won’t cut it for spring events. This sheer lace blouse has a scalloped V-neckline and relaxed fit, adding instant polish to any outfit — dressy or casual.
9. Ravishing Ruffles: Flutter sleeves, romantic florals and lightweight chiffon fabric make this short-sleeve blouse feel special. It’s dressy enough for events, but casual enough for a Saturday out.
10. Everyday Staple: This long-sleeve button-up shirt comes in a floral print that works for both the office and weekends. At $15, it’s an easy buy to keep in regular rotation.
11. Pretty Puff-Sleeve: Puff sleeves add shape to your shoulders, while the mock neck keeps things polished. This vibrant pink floral blouse bridges the work to weekend gap without needing a full outfit change.
12. Easy Elegance: Getting dressed shouldn’t require a strategy session. This mock-neck floral blouse with ruffle detail looks pulled together the second you put it on.
13. Waist-Slimming: Peplum tops are one of the best-kept secrets for creating waist definition. This black floral blouse uses a drawstring waist to give you a custom-looking fit.
Entertainment
Jack Osbourne Welcomes New Daughter With Nod To Late Father
Jack Osbourne welcomed a new baby with his wife, Aree Gearhart, sharing the exciting news on social media. The proud father revealed that his daughter’s name is a heartfelt tribute to his late father, Ozzy Osbourne, the legendary frontman of the English rock band Black Sabbath, who passed away in 2025.
Jack Osbourne Introduced His New Daughter To The World
On March 11, Jack posted a black-and-white video of his new daughter on Instagram, introducing his followers to the newest addition to his family.
In the short clip, the baby is sleeping on a floral sheet accompanied by a bat plushie. A birth identification card is also displayed, listing the baby’s name as Ozzy Matilda Osbourne. Baby Ozzy was born on March 5 at 8:49 a.m., weighing 7 pounds and 12 ounces.
Jack’s touching tribute to his late father was acknowledged by his followers. One wrote, “May she be as creative and kind as her grandfather.” Another commented, “Yay, we have another Ozzy Osbourne! The world is right again.”
The rock icon was born John Michael Osbourne and got the nickname Ozzy in primary school. “Ozzy” was a shortened version of his surname that other students used to tease him, but instead of getting annoyed, he owned it.
Aree Gearheart’s Pregnancy Gave The Osbourne Family Hope In Their Grief
In December 2025, Jack shared the news that his wife was 28 weeks pregnant. In an interview with The Sun, he said that the pregnancy was much-needed after they had a tough year as a family. Ozzy passed away in July 2025, and the family is still grieving his loss.
“I think it’s been partly a healthy distraction, partly healing – partly in that kind of ‘full circle’ category, in a weird way,” Jack told the outlet, adding that part of the grief was turned into hope.
A few weeks after Ozzy’s death, Jack posted a video montage tribute to his father on social media, writing, “My heart has hurt too much.” Jack added that he felt blessed to have called Ozzy his father. “My heart is full os fo much sadness and sorrow, but also so much love and gratitude. I got 14,501 days with that man and I know that is such a blessing.”
Baby Ozzy Is Jack Osbourne’s Fifth Daughter

With the addition of Ozzy, Jack is now a father of five. The TV personality has three kids with his ex-wife, Lisa Stelly. Pearl Clementine was born in 2012, followed by Andy Rose in 2015. Their third daughter, Minnie Theodora, was born in 2018.
Jack and Stelly’s divorce was finalized in 2019. He started dating Gearheart that same year and got engaged two years later. They welcomed their first child together, Maple Artemis, in 2022, and in the following year, the couple got married. Ozzy Matilda’s birth makes Jack a father of five girls.
As noted by Jack, he and Gearheart had planned to have another child, but it happened a bit earlier than expected. “It’s definitely something that we were wanting to pursue and somehow it happened, miraculously,” he shared.
Ozzy Osbourne Had A Fight With Jack That Changed His Perspective

In an interview with Variety in 2021, Ozzy admitted that he wasn’t a present father to his children. The iconic rock star struggled with alcoholism and addiction but had been sober since 2013 or 2014. In the same interview, Jack talked about his own battle, which led to a stint in rehab. He has been sober since 2003.
Looking back, Ozzy said that he came to a realization after having a fight with Jack. “I had a row with Jack. I had to talk business. And I said, ‘What have you ever f-cking wanted? I’ll give you whatever you want.’ He says, ‘What about a father’?”
According to Ozzy, that moment made him realize that it didn’t matter whether he gave his children material things if their father wasn’t around.
Ozzy Osbourne Loved Being A Grandfather
In an interview with Fox News in 2023, Jack revealed that Ozzy loved babysitting his grandchildren. However, he said his father had boundaries. When it comes to changing diapers, it was a firm no for the rock star.
Ozzy also refused to cuddle in bed with Jack’s daughters and watch TV. “He’s like, ‘I dont want them going to school being like, ‘I was in bed with my grandpa.’ He’s like, ‘No, not dealing with it.’,” Jack shared.
Despite the boundaries, Ozzy doted on his grandchildren. As he told The Guardian shortly before his death, “It’s time for me to spend some time with my grandkids, I don’t want to die in a hotel room somewhere. I want to spend the rest of my life with my family.”
Entertainment
Kelly Clarkson Says ‘American Idol’ Prize Was Not What It Seemed
More than two decades after becoming the very first winner of “American Idol,” Kelly Clarkson is revealing a surprising behind-the-scenes detail about the show that launched her career.
While chatting with guests on her daytime program, Clarkson shared that one of the biggest prizes associated with winning the competition was not what she had expected at the time.
The unexpected admission left her guests stunned and quickly sparked laughter and disbelief from the studio audience.
Kelly Clarkson Says‘American Idol’ Prize Wasn’t What It Seemed
Kelly Clarkson’s revelation happened during a recent episode of “The Kelly Clarkson Show,” where she welcomed actor Daniel Radcliffe and reality television personality Rob Rausch as guests.
The conversation turned toward reality competition winnings after Clarkson asked Rausch about the money he earned from his victory on “The Traitors.”
When Rausch revealed he was still waiting to receive his $220,800 prize money, Clarkson immediately jumped in with an unexpected confession.
The singer explained that she understood the situation more than people might think because of her own experience after winning “American Idol” back in 2002.
“You know what, I relate to this!” Clarkson said, prompting curiosity from her guests. She went on to explain that the grand prize viewers heard about during the show did not quite work the way she had expected at the time she won.
Clarkson Says The ‘Million Dollar’ Prize Wasn’t Exactly Cash

As Kelly Clarkson continued the story, she explained that the famous million-dollar prize often mentioned during the show wasn’t delivered in the simple way many fans imagined.
“And they were like, ‘Oh, you win a million dollars,’ or whatever. No, you didn’t. They lied,” Clarkson explained while recalling the moment she realized how the prize was structured.
According to the 43-year-old, the amount was essentially tied to investment in her career rather than a direct payment to the winner.
“It was, like, a million dollars worth of investment in you,” she told the audience.
The explanation caught Radcliffe completely off guard. The “Harry Potter” star immediately interrupted the story to confirm what he had just heard, asking in disbelief, “Wait, what?”
Clarkson quickly reassured him the claim was accurate, responding simply, “Yes!” as the audience reacted with surprise.
Kelly Clarkson Reveals The Car She Expected Never Arrived

Clarkson didn’t stop at the million-dollar discussion. The “Because of You” singer also remembered another part of the prize package that she says never materialized.
At the time she won the competition, Clarkson had been told she would receive a car as part of the reward.
She explained that the vehicle would have been particularly helpful because her own car had been damaged and she couldn’t afford the insurance deductible needed to repair it.
“And then they said you get a car,” she recalled during the conversation. However, the songstress revealed the promised vehicle never actually came her way.
“And then – no! I did not get a car.” The revelation prompted audible reactions from the crowd, as many audience members appeared shocked by the story.
Clarkson Was Stunned When Clay Aiken Got A Car Instead

The situation became even more surprising when Kelly Clarkson shared what she learned shortly afterward about another “American Idol” contestant.
According to the Grammy Award winner, Clay Aiken, who finished as runner-up during the show’s second season, ended up receiving a car along with his mother.
“And then Clay Aiken, who didn’t win the second season, got a car and his mom!” Clarkson told the audience, drawing shocked reactions from the crowd.
Rausch reacted immediately by shaking his head and saying, “Unbelievable,” while Clarkson admitted she was equally stunned when she first heard about it.
“I was like, ‘What the f-ck!’” she said as she remembered the moment. The star even joked that she had confronted Aiken about the situation back then, telling the audience she had teased him after hearing the story.
Kelly Clarkson Reflects On How ‘American Idol’ Changed Her Life

Despite the surprising revelations about the prize package, Clarkson has never hidden how much winning “American Idol” transformed her life and career.
After taking the title in 2002, she quickly became one of the show’s most successful alumni.
Clarkson went on to release hit songs like “A Moment Like This,” “Behind These Hazel Eyes,” and “Because of You,” helping establish her as one of pop music’s biggest voices.
In 2025, she reflected on the anniversary of her win by thanking fans who supported her during the competition.
“Winning American Idol changed my life and I will be forever grateful for all of you that have supported me for so many years,” she wrote per the Daily Mail.
Clarkson’s success has been evident, but her life hasn’t been without challenges.
Earlier this year, she revealed she would step away from “The Kelly Clarkson Show” after seven seasons to focus more on her family, especially her kids, following the death of their father in August 2025.
Speaking about the decision during an appearance on “Today,” Clarkson said balancing everything had become overwhelming.
“There’s just too much on the plate,” Clarkson admitted, while making it clear she still planned to remain active in her career moving forward.
Entertainment
Sonja Norwood Slams Kim & Kris’ Intimate Tape Comments
Sonja Norwood is standing by her son, Ray J, amid his ongoing court case with the Kardashian-Jenner family. On Thursday (March 12), Norwood took to social media to respond to Kim Kardashian and Kris Jenner‘s recent testimony about Ray and Kim’s viral intimate tape. The singer has previously argued that the tape was a calculated move. However, under oath, Kardashian and her mom have claimed otherwise.
RELATED: Ray J’s Mom Sonja Norwood Speaks Out And Sets The Record Straight On His Health (WATCH)
Court Docs Recap Kardashian-Jenner’s Intimate Tape Comments
In October, Kim Kardashian and Kris Jenner sued Ray J for defamation related to his years-long claim of orchestrating the tape release and 2025 allegation of having a RICO case against the women. He clapped back in a countersuit in November, accusing them of violating a $6 million settlement. That settlement, reached in 2023, bans all parties from speaking on the tape. In addition to having their defamation lawsuit dismissed, Ray is seeking $1 million in damages and other relief, per PEOPLE. Most recently, according to TMZ, the momager and billionaire businesswoman called his statements a lie while under oath.
“[Ray J’s] claim that I had a plan with my mother and others to release a sex tape, defraud the public, and file a ‘fake’ lawsuit against the porn company that released it to ‘create buzz’ is a lie,” Kim K reportedly said per court documents.
Meanwhile, Kris Jenner reportedly responded to Ray J’s accusations of her committing “commercial exploitation.” She said claim is “absolutely false.” Also, adding that it’s untrue, she made Kim film an intimate tape or decide when and how to release it—a claim Ray J made in a cross-complaint filing.
In recent declarations, Kris Jenner has reportedly accused Ray J of “publicly terrorizing” her daughter for two decades. For context, the tape was released in 2007 and depicts consensual intercourse between the former couple during a vacation to Cabo San Lucas. Meanwhile, Kim Kardashian has reportedly expressed fear that Ray J’s claims could jeopardize her lawyer aspirations.
Sonja Norwood Says Ray J’s Version Of Events Is The “Truth”
After news of Kim and Kris slamming Ray J’s claims surfaced, Sonja Norwood made her stance known. Taking to Instagram early Thursday, she shared a photo that reads, “Denying the truth doesn’t make it disappear.” But it was her caption that stood ten toes down for her boy and “his journey to bring the truth forward.” She claimed that Kris and Kim know “the truth” about the tape, and even posed a question directly at the momager. And just so there’s no confusion about who wrote what, Sonja Norwood signed her name to the caption!
“Who did? After reading the declarations from Kris Jenner and Kim Kardashian, and reading their recent statements circulating, including reports published across multiple media outlets regarding the tape, I am no longer going to sit back and watch my son be “dogged” on social media over this matter when @rayj and I, Kris and Kim, and many others know the truth. And Kris, momager, you say you did not orchestrate the commercial release of the tape. Then who did? I support @rayj and his journey to bring the truth forward. I have witnessed this journey for many years, and however long it takes, whether it becomes a long journey or a difficult battle, we will stay on that path until the voices that have distorted the truth are publicly revealed. And if that truth journey must continue all the way to the doorstep of God’s judgment, then so be it,” Norwood wrote.
RELATED: Amy Luciani Reacts After Dwight Howard Files For Divorce, Royce Reed Seemingly Weighs In
What Do You Think Roomies?
Entertainment
Why Katherine Heigl Vanished From Hollywood Spotlight
For years, Katherine Heigl seemed unstoppable in Hollywood. After breaking out on the hit drama “Grey’s Anatomy” and becoming a rom-com favorite, the actress quickly rose to A-list status.
However, the momentum didn’t last. A mix of controversies, industry rumors, and headline-making comments gradually changed how she was perceived in Hollywood.
Today, Heigl lives far from the spotlight, prompting fans to wonder whether her career slowdown was truly her choice or the result of a reputation she struggled to shake.
Katherine Heigl Went From Hollywood Darling To Industry Controversy

Katherine Heigl’s rise in Hollywood happened quickly after she landed the role of Dr. Izzie Stevens in “Grey’s Anatomy” in 2005.
The role earned her widespread recognition and eventually an Emmy Award in 2007, placing her among television’s most talked-about stars.
Around the same time, she became a major box office presence with romantic comedies like “Knocked Up,” directed by Judd Apatow.
For a period, Heigl appeared poised to dominate both television and film.
However, the actress’s image began shifting after several public comments created friction in Hollywood circles.
“She started her career early and was the darling and the next big thing, but how she dealt with her co-stars at Grey’s and [2007 movie] Knocked Up was well documented,” an insider told the Daily Mail.
Critics started describing her as “difficult,” a label that would follow her for years.
According to the source, the narrative surrounding her behavior became difficult to escape.
“Katherine, as we all know, was forced out of Hollywood for being difficult,” the insider claimed, suggesting the reputation stuck long after the initial controversies.
Heigl’s ‘Grey’s Anatomy’ Comments Sparked Industry Backlash

One of the earliest controversies came during the height of Katherine Heigl’s success on “Grey’s Anatomy.”
In 2008, the actress withdrew herself from Emmy consideration despite previously winning the award for the role.
She explained that she had not been given the material that season to warrant an Emmy nomination.
Many interpreted the statement as a criticism of the show’s creative team, including creator Shonda Rhimes.
The moment quickly became one of the most talked-about controversies surrounding the actress. Heigl later admitted the situation could have been handled differently and said she apologized privately.
Still, tensions continued to build when she later appeared on a late night show, where she described the show’s long filming schedule as cruel and mean.
Looking back, Heigl acknowledged she regretted how the comment sounded, admitting she felt embarrassed by how “whiny [she] sounded.”
Katherine Heigl’s Film Comments Also Stirred Tension With Co-Stars

Television wasn’t the only place where controversy followed Heigl. Her comments about “Knocked Up,” the comedy that helped expand her movie career, also drew criticism.
In an interview with Vanity Fair, the 47-year-old described the film as “a little sexist,” explaining that it portrayed women as “shrews, humorless and uptight.”
The remarks created tension with her co-star Seth Rogen, who later addressed the issue during a conversation with Howard Stern.
Rogen said he felt his “trust” had been “betrayed” by the comments, which surprised many fans because the film had been one of the biggest hits of Heigl’s career.
At the same time, reports surfaced suggesting the actress had failed to appear on set to film episodes of “Grey’s Anatomy” during its sixth season.
Heigl rejected those claims, explaining that she had been on family leave after adopting her daughter and was waiting for the production team to call her back to work.
Eventually, she and Rhimes reached an agreement that allowed her to leave the show early, bringing her time on the series to an end in 2010.
Heigl Later Fought Back Against Her ‘Difficult’ Reputation

As the narrative around her career grew, Katherine Heigl began publicly addressing the label that had followed her for years.
In a 2021 interview with The Washington Post, she spoke openly about how her comments had been interpreted and how the criticism escalated over time.
“I may have said a couple of things you didn’t like, but then that escalated to ‘she’s ungrateful,’ then that escalated to ‘she’s difficult,’ and that escalated to ‘she’s unprofessional,’” she said.
Heigl also questioned what people truly meant when they described someone as difficult. “What is your definition of difficult? Somebody with an opinion that you don’t like? Now, I’m 42, and that sh-t pisses me off.”
Despite the ongoing reputation challenges, the actress continued working in television, including roles in “Suits” and the Netflix series “Firefly Lane.”
Katherine Heigl’s Life In Utah And Political Rumors Spark New Debate

In recent years, Heigl has stepped away from the Hollywood spotlight and built a quieter life with her husband, musician Josh Kelley, and their three children on a large ranch in Utah.
Heigl has also focused heavily on animal welfare. She launched the dog food brand Badlands Ranch in 2022 and turned part of her property into an animal sanctuary.
Recently, her appearance at a charity event held at Mar-a-Lago sparked speculation about her political views, something she has largely avoided discussing publicly.
According to a source, the actress is cautious about entering political debates because it could affect how she is perceived in Hollywood.
“The reason Katherine avoids political talk is because she is already blacklisted with so many in Hollywood. If she brought politics into the situation, she would inevitably alienate herself further,” the source said.
They also emphasized that her attendance at the event was connected to a personal cause rather than politics. “Having been seen at Mar-a-Lago, people will talk, but the event was a fundraiser close to her heart. She didn’t go because of any political leanings,” the source shared.
Even so, the insider suggested rebuilding her standing in Hollywood could be difficult.
They said, “Katherine can’t seem to shake the attitude she brought to Hollywood when she was on top of the world. It’s an uphill battle right now. If she gets another chance, she will gladly play accordingly to have a comeback, but it isn’t going to happen soon since so many people don’t like her.”
The source also suggested that Heigl will likely continue avoiding political discussions in the future.
They shared, “Though she is outspoken when she has to be, she will continue avoiding politics and will not bash anyone whether they deserve it or not.”
Entertainment
Gisele Bündchen’s Makeup Artist Shared the Trick to Long Lashes
Us Weekly has affiliate partnerships. We receive compensation when you click on a link and make a purchase. Learn more!
Gisele Bündchen has long been the poster child for effortless beauty, known for her glowing skin, barely-there makeup and naturally long lashes. One of the products helping create that signature look is the Sweed Cloud Mascara — a cult-favorite formula loved for giving lashes a soft, fluttery finish without looking heavy or overdone. Designed to add length and lift while keeping lashes feathery and natural, it perfectly complements Bündchen’s iconic ‘no-makeup makeup’ aesthetic.
The product was recently spotlighted when makeup artist Jenna Anton revealed on Instagram that the mascara is one of the staples she uses while creating Bündchen’s signature fresh-faced look. The formula is designed to build length and definition without creating that thick, overly dramatic effect. Instead of clumping or weighing lashes down, it separates and lifts each lash, creating the appearance of longer, fuller lashes that still look soft and natural.
Get the Sweed Cloud Mascara for $30 at Amazon! Please note, prices are accurate as of the publishing date but are subject to change.
The brush also plays a big role in the result: it has a slim wand that’s designed to grab even the tiniest lashes and coat them evenly from root to tip, helping create that airy, fluttery effect that defines even the sparsest lashes. The formula layers easily too, so you can keep the look subtle with one coat or build it up for a bit more drama without ending up with stiff or spidery lashes.
To use it, start at the base of the lashes and gently wiggle the wand upward to distribute the product evenly. One coat creates soft definition, while a second coat enhances length and lift. Because the formula stays lightweight, lashes maintain that fluffy, separated look rather than feeling crunchy or weighed down.
One Amazon reviewer who called it the “best mascara” said it doesn’t “clump” or “smudge” and that “one coat on your lashes is all it takes” to “lengthen, curl and give volume.”
If you’re after lashes that look long, lifted and effortlessly pretty, this celebrity-loved mascara might be worth adding to your routine. Shop Sweed Beauty’s Cloud Mascara now to recreate Bündchen’s signature fluttery lash look!
Get the Sweed Cloud Mascara for $30 at Amazon! Please note, prices are accurate as of the publishing date but are subject to change.
Looking for something else? Explore more mascaras here and don’t forget to check out all of Amazon’s Daily Deals for more great finds!
-
Business6 days ago
Form 8K Entergy Mississippi LLC For: 6 March
-
News Videos3 days ago10th Algebra | Financial Planning | Question Bank Solution | Board Exam 2026
-
Fashion6 days agoWeekend Open Thread: Ann Taylor
-
Crypto World3 days agoParadigm, a16z, Winklevoss Capital, Balaji Srinivasan among investors in ZODL
-
Tech1 day agoA 1,300-Pound NASA Spacecraft To Re-Enter Earth’s Atmosphere
-
Sports7 days ago499 runs and 34 sixes later, India beat England to enter T20 World Cup final | Cricket News
-
Politics6 days agoTop Mamdani aide takes progressive project to the UK
-
Tech2 days agoChatGPT will now generate interactive visuals to help you with math and science concepts
-
Business2 days agoExxonMobil seeks to move corporate registration from New Jersey to Texas
-
Sports5 days agoThree share 2-shot lead entering final round in Hong Kong
-
Sports4 days agoBraveheart Lakshya downs Lai in epic battle to enter All England Open final | Other Sports News
-
NewsBeat22 hours agoResidents reaction as Shildon murder probe enters second day
-
NewsBeat7 days agoPiccadilly Circus just unveiled ‘London’s newest tourist attraction’ and it only costs 80p to enter
-
Entertainment6 days agoHailey Bieber Poses For Sexy Selfies In New Luscious Lip Thirst Traps
-
Business4 days agoSearch for Nancy Guthrie Enters 37th Day as FBI Probes Wi-Fi Jammer Theory
-
Business1 day agoSearch Enters Sixth Week With New Leads in Tucson Abduction Case
-
NewsBeat3 days agoPagazzi Lighting enters administration as 70 jobs lost and 11 stores close across Scotland
-
Tech3 days agoDespite challenges, Ireland sixth in EU for board gender diversity
-
Business3 days agoSearch Enters 39th Day with FBI Tip Line Developments and No Major Breakthroughs
-
NewsBeat1 day agoI Entered The Manosphere. Nothing Could Prepare Me For What I Found.





