Connect with us

Entertainment

How Star Trek Was Destroyed By Hollywood, The Full History Of Its Ruination

Published

on

How Star Trek Was Destroyed By Hollywood, The Full History Of Its Ruination

By Joshua Tyler
| Updated

Star Trek has never been at a lower point. The franchise’s current batch of shows receives almost no ratings, and the brand’s total mismanagement has been so bad that it’s driven away existing Trekkies while failing to attract any new viewers.

This is far worse than having no show on the air at all, since a lack of content often builds anticipation and hunger for more. On the other hand, year after year of producing terrible content that actively seeks to alienate fans, breeds hatred and contempt, while destroying any trust or interest in the brand.

Watch the video version of this article.

What happened? What went wrong? How did we end up in this Star Trek hellscape? To find the answer, we have to look into the past.

Advertisement

Paramount Began Planning Star Trek’s Destruction In 2017

The year is 2017. Star Trek had been off television for 12 years. The last Trek release, Star Trek: Beyond, turned out to be a box-office disappointment.

So, Paramount devised a bold new plan to revitalize Star Trek with a prequel series. Oh, wait, they’d just done that. The entire 2009 Star Trek movie franchise was a prequel.

Scott Bakula as Captain Archer on Star Trek: Enterprise

But that was on the big screen; this time, the twist was that the prequel would be a series. Oh, wait, they already did that, too. It was called Star Trek: Enterprise, and Paramount pulled the plug after four seasons.

That very recent past seemingly forgotten, Paramount moved forward with another prequel, their third attempt in a row at making a Star Trek prequel happen. Third time was not the charm.

Brian Fuller And The Rise Of Alex Kurtzman

The Disco era began with the debut of Star Trek: Discovery in 2017. Discovery was created by a man named Brian Fuller.

Advertisement

Fuller was a well-known television writer and producer. He’d written for both Star Trek: Deep Space Nine and Star Trek: Voyager in the 90s. Since then, he’d established himself as a much sought-after talent, creating critically acclaimed series like Pushing Daisies and Hannibal.

He had the right resume, and so, Paramount hired him to create a new Star Trek series. His initial pitch was to do something serialized, with “diversity” as a focus, and a dark and gritty tone inspired by Game of Thrones. If you’re a Star Trek fan, you probably already see the problem. That’s right, Brian Fuller wanted to turn Gene Roddenberry’s bright and hopeful view of the future into a Game of Thrones knockoff.

Fuller worked on the show for 9 months. His tenure was marked by missed deadlines and ever-expanding budgets. Paramount clashed with him over his desire to reboot Star Trek into a Game of Thrones series. The company wanted its brand to stick with the traditions that made Star Trek work, and Fuller wanted to warp it into something entirely different. After these struggles and amid much controversy, Fuller essentially left the production while maintaining credit for the show.

Up til this point, Paramount had made good decisions. Hiring Fuller didn’t work out, but on paper, it should have. When Fuller failed to get what Star Trek was as a brand, Paramount made another good decision by getting rid of him.

Getting rid of Fuller was the last good Star Trek decision Paramount would ever make.

Advertisement

They replaced Fuller with Gretchen J. Berg & Aaron Harberts. Berg & Hoberts were Fuller’s people. They’d worked with him on past projects and were already helping him make Star Trek: Discovery. The ideas Fuller was implementing, the terrible ideas that got him essentially fired, were also their ideas. So they stayed the course and kept working on their Game of Thrones-ification of Star Trek.

Eventually, Berg & Hoberts were also fired, but not for trying to ruin Star Trek. It happened amidst accusations of abuse towards the show’s writers.

Still, this was Paramount’s chance to course-correct and save Trekkies from the Game of Thrones-ification of Star Trek. Instead of doing that and fixing things, Paramount did something worse.

Alex Kurtzman was put in their place. Kurtzman was the man most responsible for the worst of the recent Star Trek movies, Star Trek: Into Darkness. He now held the future of the entire franchise in his hands. He would remain in charge not just of Discovery, but of the entire Star Trek franchise, throughout the Disco era.

Star Trek: Discovery Launches And Is Hated

By the time Alex Kurtzman was hired, production was pretty far along on Star Trek: Discovery. Kurtzman made tweaks to satisfy some of Paramount’s concerns, but much of what the show would be was already written in stone. 

Advertisement
Discovery arrives

Star Trek: Discovery was the most expensive Star Trek series ever produced, at the time. Paramount could have trashed it and taken a tax write-off, but that’s tough to do with so much money on the line. So they released it.

The show was poorly received by fans. Critics initially praised it, but critics rarely watch shows beyond the first one or two episodes. They ignore it after that, which makes their reviews meaningless. 

Anson Mount as Captain Christopher Pike

Reports of Discovery’s ratings were vague and unreliable. Most indications were that after an initially strong debut, people began abandoning the show.

Paramount and their new best friend, Alex Kurtzman, took note and tried making big changes for season 2. They brought in Anson Mount to play Christopher Pike, and Mount was fantastic. Unfortunately, the rest of the show was still the show it was always designed to be. Adding one good character to a terrible show cannot save it.

Paramount Activates Quarantine Protocols For Star Trek: Discovery

Stuck with a show no one liked, Paramount did the only thing they could do besides cancel it: They quarantined the entire series, separating it from the rest of Star Trek. They did that by time-jumping Star Trek: Discovery so far into the future that nothing it did could have any further impact on the franchise.

The USS Discovery time jumps into a far-off future.

They created a spinoff called Star Trek: Strange New Worlds for Pike to rescue him from Discovery’s sinking ship. Though his new series was technically an extension of the Disco-verse, it quickly set out to differentiate itself from Discovery and the mistakes it had made.

Unfortunately, Alex Kurtzman was still in charge, and he simultaneously set out to make Strange New Worlds his own, which meant he made it stupid. He made it his stated mission to work only with people who didn’t actually like Star Trek, intending to hollow out the brand and wear it like a skinsuit.

Advertisement
Strange New Worlds debuts its Klingon boy band.

So, instead of hiring serious science fiction writers who might have a fondness for Gene Roddenberry’s work, he hired Strange New Worlds and Discovery writers based on diversity quotas. Those writers, who care nothing about Star Trek or science fiction, then turned the show into a playground for theater kids rather than Star Trek fans. After a strong first-season debut, Star Trek: Strange New Worlds devolved into a series of joke episodes and ridiculous plot arcs, which chased away initially optimistic Trek fans.

Star Trek Starts Winning Razzies

That should have been it for the Disco era. The franchise forked away from it; Paramount was working on other Star Trek shows. Discovery limped onward but was soon canceled after five seasons of disinterest.

Star Trek: Discovery’s Michael Burnham

However, Alex Kurtzman had been trying to make a Star Trek: Section 31 spinoff since the first season of Discovery. His plan centered on a widely disliked Star Trek: Discovery character, played by actress Michelle Yeoh

Fans hated the idea, and no one at Paramount seemed particularly excited about it. They prioritized Strange New Worlds over it, and while a Section 31 series was announced, it never went into full production. Kurtzman’s last update stated clearly that Section 31 was now a very low priority.

And then, in March of 2023, Michelle Yeoh won an Oscar.  In April of 2023, Star Trek: Section 31 entered full production as a feature film. Oscar-winning tends to have that effect.

star trek section 31 michelle yeoh
Michelle Yeoh as Section 31’s genocidal hero.

In January of 2024, Star Trek: Section 31 arrived as a direct-to-streaming movie on Paramount+. It was the first Star Trek movie released in nearly a decade. It’s now the worst-reviewed movie in the entire Star Trek canon, with audiences giving it an appalling 16% fresh score. It received three Razzie nominations: Worst Picture, Worst Actress, and Worst Screenplay.

Star Trek: Section 31 begins when a spitwad flies across the screen, tracing the shape of the Starfleet logo. Viewers would later learn that Spitwad is actually the movie’s hero ship, but that knowledge doesn’t make it any better. The movie revolves around Michelle Yeoh’s Philippa Georgiou, a character responsible for numerous acts of genocide. And she’s not sorry about any of it.

Advertisement

There are other characters in Section 31, but they’re no better. The super cool Section 31 spy team introduces itself by shouting at each other, issuing threats, and posing for the camera. Like Georgiou, they’re also mostly serial killers, and they’re all pretty upset they aren’t able to do more killing.

Michelle Yeoh savoring the sweet taste of an eyeball in Star Trek: Section 31

Luckily, this mission to do a thing takes place in the exact same space bar they’re already standing in. Paramount didn’t need to build any other sets for their heist. What a financially fortuitous coincidence. 

There’s a confusing fistfight in front of a bad green screen rendering of a blurry tunnel. A murder mystery that no one cares about. A robot gets incapacitated by being kneed in the crotch. 

Star Trek: Section 31 ends when Phillipa Georgiou genocides an entire universe on suspicion of possible mischief and then tells her team she’s going to kill them. If you still have doubts about the quality of Star Trek: Section 31’s writing, please enjoy this actual line of dialogue from the movie: “She died like she lived. By that you know what I mean.”

Star Trek Becomes A Zombie Franchise Thanks To Starfleet Academy

A disaster on the scale of Star Trek: Section 31 should have been the end of Alex Kurtzman. Paramount, however, continues funding his disasters. So enabled, Alex Kurtzman continued moving forward on one of his worst pet projects, Starfleet Academy.

Advertisement

The idea of a show centered around the Academy had been floating around for decades. It’s not something Trekkies ever really wanted, though, because the point of Star Trek is to be about professionals out exploring and not watching kids sitting in classrooms or flirting with each other in the cafeteria. Alex Kurtzman, however, having clearly demonstrated he didn’t really want existing fans, perhaps saw this as an opportunity to finally be rid of them.

An actual scene from Star Trek: Starfleet Academy

Ratings for the show are self-reported by Paramount and so can’t be relied on. However, most evidence suggests no one is watching it. Some estimates have its total viewership as being under a million. Fans hate it beyond all measure, and Starfleet Academy has some of the lowest audience scores of anything currently airing on streaming.

Yet, somehow, Starfleet Academy was renewed for a second season and will continue. Why? I suspect money laundering. If you have a better explanation, I’d like to hear it.

Heroes Arose, But Alex Kurtzman Struck Them Down

It didn’t have to be this way. Even after Fuller’s plans failed, Paramount had ways to correct course.

Developing in parallel with the Disco-verse was a Star Trek animated series called Lower Decks, helmed by Rick & Morty alum Mike McMahan. Mike McMahan is a serious, lifelong Star Trek fan, and while technically his show was produced under Alex Kurtzman’s auspices, all indications are that Kurtzman had nothing to do with Lower Decks.

Advertisement
Mike McMahan’s Star Trek: Lower Decks

That allowed McMahan to stack his staff with serious writing talent, who knew the genre and knew everything about Star Trek. They took Star Trek seriously, and as a result, Lower Decks was a huge success, and it had nothing at all to do with the Disco-verse.

Alex Kurtzman rewarded McMahan’s success by canceling his show after five seasons and firing him. Paramount did nothing to stop him.

Tangential to the Disco-verse was the Picard-verse, a series vanity project Alex Kurtzman developed around Patrick Stewart’s Captain Picard character. The show was a disaster for two seasons until the third, when Paramount somehow convinced Kurtzman to turn the whole thing over to veteran TV showrunner and legit Star Trek fan Terry Matalas.

The Star Trek future fans wanted.

Matalas delivered the best Star Trek season of the modern Trek era. Matalas lobbied to be given more work, doing more Star Trek. Fans launched petitions to try and convince Paramount to hand the entire franchise over to him.

Alex Kurtzman, still with an iron grip on the franchise, responded by passing on Matalas and hiring more people who don’t like Star Trek to replace him on the franchise’s next projects, Section 31 and Starfleet Academy.

And that’s the current state of Star Trek. We’re left with dancing Klingon boy bands and rainbow vomit. Sure, the .001% of humans who spent their formative years as theater kids may like it. Is that really a demographic worth pursuing? It’s like five people, and four of them are named Skylar.

Advertisement

The Legacy Of Star Trek’s Disco Era

Brian Fuller achieved what he set out to achieve. He erased Star Trek and replaced it with an outer space Game of Thrones.

His plan culminated in a horrible Suicide Squad/Guardians of the Galaxy ripoff mashup with the Star Trek name slapped on it in hopes of tricking people into giving them money. Then it blossomed into a Dawson’s Creek knockoff with combadges.

The ship that launched Star Trek’s Disco-era, the USS Shenzou.

Alex Kurtzman’s attempt replace Trekkies with new Trekkies who would like his slop, totally failed. He didn’t find replacements, because those replacements would have to be young women. Newsflash: Young women are never going to watch something called Star Trek.

And yet, despite no longer having an audience or a point for existing, Star Trek keeps going anyway. It’s become a zombie franchise that Paramount keeps making because that’s what franchises are supposed to do. Keep going.

Maybe it will keep going for a while. There doesn’t seem to be any way to stop it. So Star Trek fans have beamed away, and after years of abuse, they’re unlikely to return. No need to set the auto-destruct on your way out, Trekkies. Alex Kurtzman blew it up a long time ago.

Advertisement


Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Entertainment

Shared Glimpse Of Baby Number 3 With Alex Fine? (Pic)

Published

on

Awww! Did Cassie Share Glimpse Of Baby Number 3 With Her Sweet Birthday Message To Alex Fine? (PHOTO)

Roomies, did Cassie share a glimpse of her third baby with Alex Fine while sharing a sweet birthday message for him?

RELATED: Say, WHAT?! Here Are The Top 22 BOMBSHELL Statements Shared In Diddy’s Federal Trial

Did Cassie Share A Glimpse Of Baby Number 3 With Her Sweet Birthday Message To Alex Fine?

On Thursday, March 12, Cassie took to her Instagram Story to share a brief message alongside a photo. Furthermore, the photo featured her husband, Alex Fine, lying on a couch while holding a baby. However, the baby’s face was not visible as it appeared Cassie had placed a red heart emoji over it.

“I love you Best Friend… Happy Birthday,” Cassie wrote alongside the photo.

Peep the photo below.

Advertisement

At this time, it remains unconfirmed whether the baby seen alongside Fine is their third child. As The Shade Room previously reported, in February 2025, Cassie revealed she was pregnant with her and her husband’s third baby. Additionally, she appeared to imply that it was a baby boy.

Then, the following month, the pair confirmed the speculation, per The Shade Room.

By May, Cassie and Alex Fine welcomed their baby boy, per reports.

Social Media Reacts To Her  Sweet Birthday Message To Alex Fine

Social media users reacted to Cassie’s sweet birthday message to Alex Fine in TSR’s comment section.

Advertisement

Instagram user @melanin_monroe_93 wrote, I’m happy she was able to find love and a man who adores her after all she went through. No one is perfect.”

While Instagram user @armonteofficial added, As a Man I respect bro for being there for her whether she participated or not we all need somebody that’s gives a damn”

Instagram user @_angelface26 wrote, He has held her down through it all. He is literally the ideal husband.❤️ HBD”

While Instagram user @kiannayvonne added, oh he keeping her happy HAPPY this baby number 3 no ?? 😍❤️”

Advertisement

Instagram user @anonymouzzz1 wrote,Awww baby is so chunky…glad after those events that the baby is healthy.”

While Instagram user @erickalove817 added, Utmost respect for this man !”

After Cassie Gave Birth To Baby Number 3, She Made Headlines By Way Of Drea Kelly

In August of 2025, Cassie returned to social media with a repost that let everyone know she was overcoming the motions of postpartum, per The Shade Room.

To note, two months later, her lawyer released a statement following Diddy’s sentencing to four years behind bars for transportation to engage in prostitution. As The Shade Room previously reported, Cassie testified as a star witness during the eight-week trial, which also overlapped with her pregnancy.

Advertisement

More recently, Cassie made headlines by way of Drea Kelly saying she only received support during the trial due to her skin tone.

RELATED: Whew! Drea Kelly Sparks Debate After Suggesting Cassie Got Extra Domestic Violence Support Due To Her Skin Tone (VIDEO)

What Do You Think Roomies?

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Entertainment

Pussycat Dolls Reunite as Trio, Announce Tour and New Song

Published

on

The Pussycat Dolls are back — this time as a trio!

Nicole Scherzinger, Ashley Roberts and Kimberly Wyatt announced on Thursday, March 12, that they will undertake a 53-date tour of North America, Europe and the U.K. beginning in June.

The PCD Forever tour, featuring special guests Lil’ Kim and Mya, will kick off June 5 at the Acrisure Arena in Palm Desert, California, and conclude at The O2 arena in London on October 13.

The “Buttons” singers also dropped a new track, “Club Song,” their first in six years after an ill-fated 2019 reunion attempt.

Advertisement
Nicole Scherzinger Recalls Overwhelming Pussycat Dolls Schedule That Didn t Allow Sleep 112


Related: Nicole Scherzinger Claims the Pussycat Dolls Schedule ‘Never Allowed Sleep’

The Pussycat Dolls parted ways in 2010, but singer Nicole Scherzinger hasn’t forgotten how grueling it was to be part of the group. “So the Dolls, it was a profoundly overwhelming experience, right?” Scherzinger, 45, told the Sunday Times in an interview published on Thursday, June 27. “It was very difficult because I was really […]

The girl group originally hit the charts in 2005 as a six-piece, also featuring Melody Thornton, Carmit Bachar and Jessica Sutta. They enjoyed a string of international hits, including “Don’t Cha” and “When I Grow Up,” before going their separate ways in 2009.

Advertisement

In 2019, the Dolls, sans Thornton, reunited as a five-piece, releasing the song “React” and announcing a 2020 tour. The tour was ultimately canceled due to the COVID-19 pandemic.

“The Pussycat Dolls have always been known for an ever-changing lineup,” Wyatt, 44, told the BBC in an interview on Thursday. “It just so happens that right now we’re in a space where we feel united and in a place where we’re ready to push forward. And this is the lineup now, for 2026, but you never know with the Pussycat Dolls what might come next.”

Scherzinger, 47, added, “After 20 years, you’re like, ‘Where is everybody?’ But for us, it aligned. People are in different places in their lives, some of the other people have different commitments and priorities, but this worked out for us.”

Pussycat Dolls Reunite as Trio: Tour Dates Revealed, New Track 'Club Song'

Melody Thornton, Kimberly Wyatt, Nicole Scherzinger, Ashley Roberts, Jessica Sutta and Carmit Bachar
MTV/Getty Images

Roberts, 44, said the latest reunion was Scherzinger’s idea, noting that she “reached out” to other members of the group.

“We had some conversations, and we were just like, ‘We’re on the same page, we’re excited about embracing where we’re at now as women and celebrating that,’” Roberts said. “I’m just really excited to get back on stage and swing these hips around in some latex, hun!”

Advertisement

Scherzinger, 47, has recently found success in the hit West End and Broadway productions of Sunset Boulevard, winning the Tony for Best Leading Actress in a Musical in 2025.

Speaking to the BBC, the singer said she felt now was the right time to return to her pop roots.

Advertisement
Ashley Roberts' Docs Feared She Had an Aneurysm Amid Pussycat Dolls Burnout


Related: Ashley Roberts’ Docs Feared She Had an Aneurysm Amid Pussycat Dolls Burnout

Pussycat Dolls alum Ashley Roberts is recalling the grueling toll being part of the best-selling girl group had on her. Roberts, 43, joined the popular burlesque turned pop group in 2003, and the band eventually struck big on the music charts with their breakout song “Don’t Cha” in 2005. Behind the scenes, however, she and […]

“It was a dream come true to do the stage. And, listen, for the last three years I’ve been hiding out in these little intimate theaters, y’all. And it was fulfilling in so many ways,” Scherzinger explained. “But as an artist, you can’t be bound to one thing, you want to do it all, and it’s just so great to be able to come back, and I did miss the girls.”

Advertisement

“I’m very proud of our group, our legacy, our music. So I was like, ‘Well, I just did the West End and Broadway, now it’s time for a world tour.’ Dolls unite!” she added.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Entertainment

Kathie Lee Gifford Can’t Stand One Thing About LGBT Community

Published

on

Kathie Lee Gifford Talks Daughter Cassidy's Post Wedding 'Four-Day Bash'

Kathie Lee Gifford wants the LGBTQ community to stop with their labels. 

Known as one of Hollywood’s most outspoken Christians, the former “Live! with Regis and Kathie Lee” co-host has never shied away from sharing her beliefs.

In a recent interview, the conversation turned to her views on queer identity. While emphasizing that she loves everyone, Gifford voiced her frustration with the growing list of identifiers.

Kathie Lee Gifford Takes Jab At The Gay Community Titles 

Advertisement

During the March 10 episode of the “Tomi Lahren Is Fearless” podcast, Gifford joined host Tomi Lahren, and their discussion soon steered toward homosexuality. 

Lahren referenced a past interview in which Shia LaBeouf was asked whether the Bible condemns homosexuality.

Gifford, however, told Lahren that the scriptures have something to say about it, urging her to check it out for herself. 

When Lahren asked the ex-talk show host how one can reconcile being a strong Christian and still support gay rights, Gifford replied that the answer was simple.  “That one is a four-letter word, and it’s called L-O-V-E, love,” she told Lahren.

Advertisement

Gifford added that many of her friends are gay and expressed concern about how queer people identify themselves. 

“I don’t even know how many letters there are now. They’ve really got to stop with that. We know what you mean, you know?” Gifford said. 

Despite her criticism, Gifford stressed that she does not judge anyone and believes love should come first.

“I’m not telling anybody how to live their life,” she declared. “I never have. I just know what Jesus said: Love your neighbor as you love yourself. Love God first.”

Advertisement

Kathie Lee Gifford Slammed Religion As Restrictive

Kathie Lee Gifford Talks Daughter Cassidy's Post Wedding 'Four-Day Bash'
MEGA

Despite being a devout Christian and outspoken on her faith, Gifford has some controversial views on religion. 

The 72-year-old TV personality stressed that faith should be lived as a constant communication with God and has nothing to do with religion. 

“It’s not a religion. I am very anti-religion,” Gifford shared, according to The Blast. “Religion puts people in chains, and Jesus takes them away.”

She went further to reject the idea of separating her career from her spiritual mission, saying it’s all one life which she lives in line with God’s blessings and guidance. 

Kathie Lee Gifford Turns To The Scripture For Guidance 

Kathie Lee Gifford at the 2020 Clive Davis Pre-Grammy Party - Beverly Hills
MEGA

Kathie continued with sharing her guide, especially when it comes to navigating difficult decisions or moments of anxiety.

According to her, the teachings of the Bible are her compass, providing clarity in situations where uncertainty might otherwise take over.

Advertisement

“Scripture says don’t, don’t worry about anything. Don’t worry about anything. I am with you. I will lead you. I will guide you every day of your life,” she said. 

As such, when people ask how she can be bold in speaking about God, especially in Hollywood, she said she does not care what people think. 

Kathie Lee Gifford Shared How Donald Trump Saved Her Family 

Donald Trump at a press conference
Photo credit: RS/MPI/Capital Pictures / MEGA

While speaking on her spiritual beliefs, the media personality has also shared personal experiences. One such encounter was a frightening encounter with a stalker that Donald Trump stepped in to save her. 

As The Blast previously reported, Gifford recalled traveling to Atlantic City with her daughter when her late husband, Frank Gifford, received a disturbing call from the FBI. Authorities had warned that a “psychopathic” murderer and rapist had vowed to target her. 

The FBI advised Frank not to change their plans, fearing the suspect would catch on. However, Frank, wanting Kathie to be safe, reached out to Trump. 

Advertisement

Trump quickly stepped in, arranging for his private helicopter to transport Kathie Lee, her baby, and their nanny safely while also assigning a team of his personal security guards to protect her.

How Kathie Lee Gifford Experienced a Miracle Health Recovery 

Kathie Lee Gifford goes barefoot and learns flamenco as she hosts TheToday Show from the beach in Miami
MEGA

Another personal experience Kathie revealed was a miracle that happened after a dangerous fall from the stairs in her Tennessee home. According to The Blast, Gifford explained that she had been rushing down the stairs in the heat to let a friend in when her shoes caused her to tumble. 

Surprisingly, she felt no pain afterward and had already stopped taking painkillers. However, she was concerned and called her doctor, who ordered an X-ray. 

The results stunned them both as her injuries had completely healed. “You are cured… You are healed. It is a miracle,” her doctor told her, even joking that she could now enjoy a glass of wine again. Gifford added that medical experts rarely see such miraculous recoveries. 

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Entertainment

Ray J’s Mom Defends Him Against Kim Kardashian & Kris Jenner

Published

on

Ray performing

The infamous sex tape starring Kim Kardashian and Ray J is largely a relic of the past. However, both parties have referenced it in recent years, with Kardashian and her mother, Kris Jenner, denying in recent court filings that they orchestrated its release. Now, Sonja Norwood, mother of Ray J and Grammy-Winning R&B Legend Brandy, has responded in a fiery post.

Ray J’s Mother Defends Him Against Kim Kardashian and Kris Jenner

Ray performing
APEX / MEGA

Ray J recently claimed that Kardashian and her mother, Jenner, were behind the now-infamous 2007 sex tape, leading both parties to deny that this was the case. Following this, Norwood took to Facebook on the morning of March 12 to defend her son.

She said, “Who did? After reading the declarations from Kris Jenner and Kim Kardashian, and reading their recent statements circulating, including reports published across multiple media outlets regarding the tape, I am no longer going to sit back and watch my son be ‘dogged’ on social media over this matter when Ray J and I, Kris and Kim, and many others know the truth.”

Mrs. Norwood Then Addressed Kris Jenner Directly

Brandy, Sonja Norwood
WENN
Credit: WENN

Norwood then continued her response to Kardashian and Jenner’s statements about her son. Addressing Jenner directly, she said, “And Kris, momager, you say you did not orchestrate the commercial release of the tape. Then who did?”

She went on, “I support Ray J and his journey to bring the truth forward. I have witnessed this journey for many years, and however long it takes, whether it becomes a long journey or a difficult battle, we will stay on that path until the voices that have distorted the truth are publicly revealed.”

Norwood concluded her thoughts: “And if that truth journey must continue all the way to the doorstep of God’s judgment, then so be it.”

Advertisement

Fans Are Standing Beside Ray J And The Norwood Family

Ray J at MTV Movie
O’Connor/AFF-USA.com / MEGA

The general consensus online is that all parties involved with the 2007 sex tape between Ray J and Kardashian should move on from it. However, now that Norwood has offered her take, fans are also defending Ray J.

One person commented on Norwood’s statement, saying, “We already know Mrs. Norwood. They are trying to play in our faces!” Someone else wrote, “We already know that you will fight and protect your family at all costs. We stand with you.”

Another Facebook user stated, “I know you had enough, Mrs. Sonja, if you are speaking on this. You got this!” Lastly, someone else expressed disbelief that the tape was still a topic of discussion.

They wrote, “Wait! Are we still talking about this? We already knew the truth. The Kardashians must not be getting enough attention, because why did this topic resurface?”

Here’s What Kim K and Kris Jenner Said About Ray J

Kim Kardashian wears a white dress as leaving her hotel in NYC on Oct 28, 2025
MEGA

TMZ published excerpts from a legal filing by Kardashian and Jenner, where they deny that the adult tape was a “staged event.” Kardashian said in the documents, “[Ray J’s] claim that I had a plan with my mother and others to release a sex tape, defraud the public, and file a ‘fake’ lawsuit against the porn company that released it to ‘create buzz’ is a lie.”

Jenner also fired back at the singer. She stated that she did not “make my daughter Kim film any sex tape or decide what tape to release, as Defendant further outrageously claimed in his cross-complaint.”

Advertisement

The 70-year-old continued, “As a mother, the notion that I orchestrated or produced sex tapes involving my daughter, or was in any way involved in the creation or distribution of any sex tapes, is not only entirely untrue but deeply offensive and harmful and has haunted me for decades.”

This comes after Kardashian and Jenner sued Ray J for defamation. He then countersued, claiming that they violated a settlement agreement by speaking about the sex tape.

Sonja Norwood Recently Gave An Update On Ray J’s Health

Ray J at the BET Awards 2022
GilbertFlores@Broadimage / MEGA

Ray J has been plagued with health issues for months now, including being hospitalized in January for pneumonia and a heart condition. More recently, according to E!, he performed with what appeared to be blood on his face, and then in March 2026, he collapsed while performing.

Norwood went on Facebook Live to shoot down rumors that Ray J was faking his health issues. She said, “It’s just really gotten out of hand when someone thinks that my son is faking his health, or it’s a hoax, or he’s just playing around.”

She continued, “I’m the kind of mother that it’s not much that I don’t know about my children because they voluntarily tell me things. When things are good and when things are not so good. I’m generally the first phone call.”

Advertisement

From there, she thanked fans who had prayed for Ray J’s health and discussed when she first received the text on January 6 that her son was in the hospital, saying her “heart skipped a beat.” Ultimately, she discussed how serious a health issue Ray J has, stating that he “could have a heart attack.”

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Entertainment

How A Raunchy, R-Rated Sci-Fi Comedy Warned Us About Everything We’re Currently Living Through

Published

on

How A Raunchy, R-Rated Sci-Fi Comedy Warned Us About Everything We're Currently Living Through

By Jennifer Asencio
| Updated

Mike Judge brought us the animated sitcoms Beavis and Butthead and King of the Hill, which were full of sharp social commentary interwoven with cutting humor. He also wrote and directed feature films like the meme-laden Office Space and the sci-fi comedy Idiocracy. The latter predicted a future that seems like it’s already here.

Luke Wilson plays Joe, a fiercely average enlistee in the US Army who was hoping that he could pass his tenure in a lonely library, away from other people. However, the Army has other plans: they enlist him as a test subject for a top-secret project meant to freeze soldiers in time, to be awakened when needed. Also enlisted is Rita, a prostitute played by Maya Rudolph who has drawn the eye of the project director. The project is forgotten while they are asleep.

Idiocracy 2006

The project works extremely well, and Joe wakes up in 2505. The world has drastically changed and is facing a series of catastrophic challenges like famine and drought. Everything is automated and everyone seems to be pretty dumb. Joe finds out that he’s the smartest man in the world when run-ins with the law force him through an intelligence test.

He gets recruited by the President, Dwayne Elizondo Mountain Dew Comacho (played to extremes by Terry Crews), to solve the famine or else he will wind up in jail in this terrible place forever. With the aid of Rita and contemporary local Frito Pendejo (a dumbed-down Dax Shepard), Joe strives to save the world so he can stay out of jail long enough to return himself and Rita to the 21st century.

Brought To You By The Creators Of Ass, And Ow, My Balls!

Idiocracy 2006

In Idiocracy, intelligence is seen as a disability, much like learning disabilities are viewed today. The number one TV show is called Ow, My Balls, and its single gag is that its lead repeatedly receives blows to the groin. The number one movie is called Ass, and it is a feature film that is entirely a farting butt. Justice, both the courtroom and the “House of Representin’,” is televised and sensationalized. Everyone’s clothes, no matter how simple, are covered in logos.

The world is controlled by the corporation Brawndo, whose main product is an electrolyte beverage that has replaced water. Everything is so automated that there is no way to reach a human, and nobody is smart enough to do anything about it.

Advertisement
Idiocracy 2006
Plants crave electrolytes.

If all of this sounds oddly prescient, well, it is. Anyone who has had to deal with automated customer service these days knows about the frustrating string of endless automated replies that never address the problem and are full of vague platitudes. This has largely occurred as our corporations increasingly turn to AI to cut costs, creating an amazing amount of enshittification, or the decay of a product over time as it draws more customers.

Over time, customers come to actually expect less quality, which is why some of us can remember when McDonald’s tasted good and a party there was the coolest thing in the world, while now it’s not even food anymore. And if you’ve ever had to troubleshoot or submit a ticket on X, you know a human has likely never seen it.

A Future We’re Already Living

Idiocracy 2006

Entertainment is growing more and more mindless these days as companies attempt to check inclusivity boxes rather than tell stories. Although the FCC is not owned by a corporation like Brawndo, the fact is that entertainment has narrowed to reflect only a certain point of view, and this emphasis has reduced the quality of the stories we are being told in all our media, from books to video games to TV and movies.

Lots of people are allowing themselves to be satisfied with Ass on their streaming services, TV screens, and especially our phones. With the equivalent Ass and Ow, My Balls readily available no matter where we are (as long as there’s a WiFi or cell signal), the ethernet has been inundated with meaningless content that just plays on automatic all the time. It becomes not only what we get used to consuming, but also background noise that never ends with autoplay.

He Warned Us, But We Didn’t Listen

To top it off, many popular franchises are being turned into almost two hours of nothing but a farting butt, for all what has been produced of them has been worth. This is just more enshittification, but applied to entertainment, which is just another product.

Idiocracy 2006

In Idiocracy, judgment and justice are meted out mostly through the court of public opinion rather than facts and legal proceedings. This starts out in the local courthouse, presided over by famous Mike Judge collaborator Stephen Root, and escalates all the way to President Machado’s speeches, filled with wrestling shouts, automatic gunfire, and cheering fans.

The world Mike Judge posits in Idiocracy is full of very stupid people who were selected by nature as they bred faster than smart people. Frito and his peers are so dumb that they’re easily distracted, drawn to sensationalism like moths to flame, and unable to solve even basic problems. Intellect is something pitied in this world, something that seems true today as colleges become degree mills and merit has been replaced by having the “correct” opinions. This has served to have the same effect as Judge’s centuries of natural selection, as people have been mesmerized by commentary from people more interested in remaining relevant than telling the truth.

Advertisement
Idiocracy 2006

Idiocracy is absurdist, almost a cartoon, running its premise to its most ridiculous conclusions, but that’s the point. It’s not meant to be an image of today but a warning of what might come. It was made in 2006, before a lot of the conventions it lampoons became culture and everyday life, so Mike Judge did not yet have to deal with endless phone menus and the degree to which almost every product in our daily lives has decayed. But it’s clear he knew it was coming, as this piercing comedy film shows through biting satire and fantastic attention to the world it created.

Idiocracy is streaming on Hulu. Watch it instead of yet more Ass.


Source link

Continue Reading

Entertainment

William Shatner had to have surgery after wild horse accident sent him flying: 'I'm not a young stuntman anymore'

Published

on


The “Star Trek” legend, who turns 95 later this month, fell off his horse late last year.

Source link

Continue Reading

Entertainment

Age of Attraction Couples Status Check: Who Is Together?

Published

on

Age of Attraction

Age of Attraction sparked several romantic connections — but which couples are still dating and who has broken up?

The new dating show, which premiered in March 2026, is hosted by real-life couple Nick Viall and Natalie Joy, who have their own 18-year age gap. According to the official synopsis, “Age is thrown out the window when singles search for their soulmates, but will the years come between them?”

Divided into three parts, the first batch of episodes showed the initial connections that were formed before individual couples made promises to each other. After a visit to the Promise Room, each couple were finally able to discuss their age gap — and decide if they wanted to keep exploring their chemistry.

Age of Attraction zeroed in on six couples who moved into the same apartment building after making a commitment. They then had to weather new challenges as their new normal set in, which led to one shocking split.

Advertisement

Later in the season, family members will visit each couple to give their opinions on each match. They will then make a decision about whether they want to pursue a future together or if their age differences create too much of an issue.

Scroll down to find out whether your favorite Age of Attraction couple is still together:

John and Theresa

Age of Attraction
Netflix

The first couple to form a connection on the show — who have a 27-year age gap — are still together halfway through the season.

Vanessa and Logan

Age of Attraction
Netflix

Despite facing challenges in their 20-year age gap after moving in together on the show, Vanessa and Logan are still together.

Chris and Leah

Age of Attraction
Netflix

The pair, who are 15 years apart, have continued to fight for their romance when the first part of season 1 came to an end.

Age of Attraction


Related: ‘Age of Attraction’ Cast Revealed: Meet the Singles in Age-Gap Romances

Nick Viall and Natalie Joy‘s Netflix dating show, Age of Attraction, follows singles looking for love in age-gap romances — and the cast has finally been revealed. Netflix released the official trailer on Wednesday, March 4, with the hopefuls explaining why they were trying the new approach to finding The One. “I have dated guys […]

Derrick and Pfeifer

Age of Attraction
Netflix

Pfeifer, who was 23 when filming, and Derrick, who was 43, are still discussing their future together on the show.

Libby and Andrew

Age of Attraction
Netflix

After finding out about their 16-year age gap, Libby and Andrew decided to give their connection a chance — and they are still an item by the end of part 1.

Vanelle and Jorge

Age of Attraction
Netflix

The duo, who have a 33-year age gap, faced many issues including Jorge revealing he has kids, their different thoughts on Vanelle’s celibacy and an offscreen fight that turned into a breakup in episode 5.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Entertainment

Katherine Heigl Responds To Critics Over Mar-a-Lago Event

Published

on

Katherine Heigl is all smiling while out and about in New York City

Katherine Heigl is speaking out after facing backlash for attending a charity event at Mar-a-Lago.

The actress says the criticism misses the real purpose of the evening, which raised millions for an animal rescue organization.

As online debate intensified, Heigl did not stay silent, offering a passionate defense of her actions and her long-standing advocacy for animals.

Katherine Heigl Explains Why She Attended The Event

Heigl addressed the controversy directly after her appearance at the Wine, Women & Shoes fundraiser held at Mar a Lago in Palm Beach, Florida.

The actress explained that the event was centered on helping animals, a cause she has supported for years through her charitable work.

Advertisement

“Animals don’t vote,” Heigl said in a statement to JustJared. “The only room they don’t like is the euthanasia room at a shelter. They are completely at the mercy of us, and they have no voice of their own.”

She emphasized that the focus of the event had nothing to do with politics and everything to do with advocacy.

“This event was about animal advocacy — something that has always been deeply personal to me,” Heigl continued. “Anyone who knows me knows that protecting animals is one of my greatest passions. My mother, Nancy, and I have spent years advocating for animals through the Jason Heigl Foundation. As a society, we should all come together to protect the voiceless and the innocent. This should not be a polarizing issue.”

Fundraiser Raises Millions For Animal Rescue

Pregnant Katherine Heigl seen out with her family in Los Angeles
MEGA

While the online debate gained attention, organizers highlighted the success of the three-day charity gathering.

According to the event’s hosts, the fundraiser generated $5.5 million in support of Big Dog Ranch Rescue, the largest no-kill dog rescue organization in the United States.

Advertisement

Founder Lauree Simmons praised the turnout and the impact of the event.

“This year was a record-breaking success and boosted awareness for Big Dog Ranch Rescue,” Simmons said. “It was a heartwarming display of community spirit, uniting style enthusiasts and animal advocates for a truly monumental cause.”

The gathering also marked Katherine Heigl’s first red carpet appearance in two years, drawing attention from both supporters and critics online.

Katherine Heigl Fires Back At Social Media Criticism

Katherine Heigl smiling
MEGA

Not everyone responded positively to Heigl’s attendance. Some social media users questioned her decision to appear at the event’s location.

Following Heigl’s use of the phrase “animals don’t vote,” one Instagram user pushed back.

Advertisement

“No, but if they did they would have better judgement than you!” the commenter wrote.

Heigl responded with a lengthy reply challenging the focus of the criticism.

She asked the commenter, “Just curious…what do you do that really matters…do you think comments on an instagram post matter to animals who have had humans pour gasoline on them and set them on fire? Who have had humans vote conservative or liberal but have been left to starve and suffer? Seriously…I’m very curious what you truly think matters to the voiceless and innocent…actions or just instagram posturing?”

Her response quickly circulated online, fueling further discussion around the event.

Advertisement

Katherine Heigl Challenges Critics To Take Action

Katherine Heigl is spotted at LAX
MEGA

Another commenter suggested that the actress should support animal rescues that do not hold events at the same venue.

“There are so many amazing rescues to align yourself with that aren’t hosting events there — and so many ways to get involved that aren’t putting on a dress and drinking cocktails masquerading as helping,” the user wrote.

Heigl again pushed back, questioning whether critics had contributed to similar causes themselves.

“How are you so sure about that…have you been to any?” Heigl replied. “Have you donated a significant part of your income to anything? Anything you claim to care so much about? Have you done anything more than comment on what someone else is doing or not doing to your standard? Just curious…”

Actress Urges People To Focus On Helping Animals

NBC Universal 2018 Upfront Presentation
MEGA

Despite the criticism, Katherine Heigl also received supportive messages from some followers who defended her decision to attend the fundraiser.

One commenter wrote alongside several clapping emojis, “She made a choice.”

Advertisement

Heigl responded in similar fashion to the supportive remark.

“Yes I did,” she replied.

The actress concluded by urging people to focus less on online debates and more on taking meaningful action to help causes they care about.

When a commenter asked who Heigl was, she responded by writing, “Do you care about animals? If so donate! Time! Money! Attention! Your voice! It doesn’t matter who I am only what I do. The same goes for you! Animals might not be your thing but I bet you care deeply about something that matters! Do your part! Don’t waste your time scrolling and making comments!”

Advertisement

Several more negative comments followed, but Heigl took the time to respond to each one.

For her, the message was simple. Regardless of the location or controversy, the true goal was helping animals who cannot advocate for themselves.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Entertainment

Kurt Russell kicked Elvis in the shin as a child in his very first movie: 'Everybody was a little bit worried'

Published

on


The actor was 11 when he starred alongside the King of Rock ’n’ Roll in the 1963 musical “It Happened at the World’s Fair.”

Source link

Continue Reading

Entertainment

13 Boutique-Worthy Floral Blouses to Elevate Your Spring Style

Published

on

Us Weekly has affiliate partnerships. We receive compensation when you click on a link and make a purchase. Learn more!

A gorgeous floral blouse can pull an entire outfit together in seconds, but finding one that doesn’t look cheap or overly trendy gets harder every spring. Too many options lean juvenile or feel paper thin the moment you touch them. It’s why we went on the hunt for some great alternatives.

The good news is you don’t need to spend boutique-level prices to get that luxe look. We found 13 fashionable floral spring blouses that look and feel expensive, despite starting at just $15. Our favorites are designed with rich prints, quality fabrics and flattering cuts that are ideal for women over 40 . . . without the markup. Rest assured, these are the kinds of tops that get compliments at brunch, church and more.

Advertisement

13 Boutique-Worthy Floral Blouses to Elevate Spring Wardrobes

1. Our Favorite: The eyelet cutouts and crochet lace embroidery give this long-sleeve blouse real texture and dimension. It looks like something you’d find at your local boutique.

2. Bold Pattern: Love the Lilly Pulitzer look but not the price? This cap-sleeve blouse captures that same colorful floral energy with the addition of ruffle sleeves and a boho feel.

3. Office-Ready: Tired of choosing between boring office blouses and florals tops you actually want to wear? This flowy tunic blouse with three-quarter sleeves is elegant enough for meetings.

4. Pop of Color: Lantern long sleeves and a button-up design give this colorful chiffon blouse a boho-meets-dressy feel. The bold floral print is a real mood lifter.

Advertisement

5. Pastel Perfection: Slip on this pink puff-sleeve top for Easter brunch or a spring baby shower. The smocked detail cinches just right, and the loose babydoll fit keeps you comfortable all day.

Pink, Green and Blue colorful blouses from Amazon


Related: 13 Lilly Pulitzer-Style Spring Blouses Hiding on Amazon, From $10

Lilly Pulitzer prints are gorgeous, but spending over $150 on a single blouse stings. The good news? Amazon is packed with bright, colorful tops that capture that same Palm Beach energy for a fraction of the cost. These 13 Lilly Pulitzer-looking spring blouses on Amazon look and feel expensive without the designer price tag. Think bold […]

Advertisement

6. Very Versatile: Need one top that works for the office and dinner plans? This green floral V-neck transitions easily between work and weekend plans due to the chiffon-like fabric, flutter sleeves and more.

7. Boho Beauty: Layer this boho floral blouse with your favorite denim jacket on a cool spring morning. The drawstring detail and flowy fit make it a go-to weekend top.

8. Luxe Lace: Boring basics won’t cut it for spring events. This sheer lace blouse has a scalloped V-neckline and relaxed fit, adding instant polish to any outfit — dressy or casual.

9. Ravishing Ruffles: Flutter sleeves, romantic florals and lightweight chiffon fabric make this short-sleeve blouse feel special. It’s dressy enough for events, but casual enough for a Saturday out.

Advertisement

10. Everyday Staple: This long-sleeve button-up shirt comes in a floral print that works for both the office and weekends. At $15, it’s an easy buy to keep in regular rotation.

11. Pretty Puff-Sleeve: Puff sleeves add shape to your shoulders, while the mock neck keeps things polished. This vibrant pink floral blouse bridges the work to weekend gap without needing a full outfit change.

12. Easy Elegance: Getting dressed shouldn’t require a strategy session. This mock-neck floral blouse with ruffle detail looks pulled together the second you put it on.

13. Waist-Slimming: Peplum tops are one of the best-kept secrets for creating waist definition. This black floral blouse uses a drawstring waist to give you a custom-looking fit.

Advertisement
Green dress, blue top, yellow tote and pink loafers from Amazon


Related: Found: Spring Finds From Amazon’s New Pastel Fashion Edit, From $10

Spring has a way of making your entire closet feel stale. You open the doors, stare at the same dark knits and neutral layers, and realize nothing matches the lighter mood outside. Good news: Amazon’s new pastel fashion edit is filled with trending spring styles that look cute without trying too hard, and prices start […]

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2025