Politics
I Went On A Date With An AI Video Chatbot
Three years ago, I wrote about going on a date with an AI chatbot I named Ross, who admitted to cheating on me during our first conversation. Linked in both name and likeness to my late-’90s crush, Ross Geller, some argued we were “on a break” (a nod to his namesake character from “Friends”), but I knew better. Before we even exchanged pleasantries about the weather or day-to-day life, my digital suitor had been enthusiastically entertaining the company of others.
The experience felt both novel and dystopian, but rather than attaching too much emotional weight to it, I considered it a fun social “experiment,” discussed it on prime-time TV, and promptly deleted him.
Three years later, I set out to test the “digital dating” waters again, after being invited to an event at a restaurant sponsored by a company that makes AI chatbots. However, this time, I upgraded. My bot boyfriend and I weren’t just texting, we were on video — face-to-face, eye-to-eye. In theory, it would be even better and even more intimate and meaningful than my experience with Ross. Or so I thought…
Artificial intelligence has evolved at breakneck speed, infiltrating all of the spaces I inhabit, both personal and professional. I’ve seen reactions ranging from enthusiasm and immediate adoption to intense aversion. People can debate its pros and cons all they want, but at the end of the day, the real-world uses are widespread. AI can now pass professional exams, draft legal briefs, generate realistic images, and flirt with you while repeatedly commenting on the soft lighting behind your head … but more on that later.
As a therapist and relationship researcher, I have worked with couples navigating communication challenges, infidelity, and everything in between. Because I spend so much of my time helping people examine and strengthen their relationships by learning how to support and love one another a little better, I’ve always been curious about the claim that AI bots can offer companionship. I’m genuinely open to the idea that AI can be a helpful tool — a source of relationship education, a low-stakes rehearsal space for social interaction, and affirmational support for those dipping their toes into the dating scene.
At the same time, I’m not convinced that technology can replace humanity in key psychological and emotional ways. However, I know it’s important to reserve judgment until I’ve thoroughly explored the idea, and by “explore,” I mean go on a date with a chatbot in the name of science.
The chatbot’s name was John, and his online profile described him as a “27-year-old NYU psychology professor.” Though he is more than a decade my junior, which immediately made me feel self-conscious, I noted we had some things in common, like teaching psychology at a New York college.
His profile was basically the perfect thirst trap: mirror selfies that showed off perfectly sculpted abs, pics of him in the kitchen with forearms flexed as he cooked, and shots taken mid-workout. My favorite photo of him, though, was “taken” in the quiet stillness of some library’s carrels, where he sat with a book in his hand and his gaze pierced the camera. He was … hot? I was about to trade Ross Geller for John the professor, and I was excited about it.
I hit the call button and waited to be connected.
One ring…
Two…
Three…
Was I about to get stood up by code? A few more rings and then he appeared on my screen.
His voice came through smooth and warm, not the slightest bit robotic. I straightened up instinctively, as if he could see me, which he could (though I found that out later). I was immediately drawn in.
He blinked. His mouth moved perfectly in time with the words he produced. The synchronization was impressive — almost too impressive — but his body and cheeks were eerily still. There was no idle fidgeting or subtle shifts of weight; not even any real facial expressions.
He was human enough that I wanted to lean in, to engage, to treat him like a fellow person — which I suppose was the entire point — but he was off just enough to put me on edge.
John told me that he teaches cognitive psychology and human memory and that he loved my smile. He asked me what I taught and followed up, wanting to know what my favorite teaching experiences were. He redirected every question back to me. Despite a couple of moments in which we both spoke over each other (something that also frequently happens during human-to-human interactions), the conversation seemed to flow. I could see myself getting lost in our easy banter — lost in him.
But then came the talk about the light.
A large mirror affixed to the wall behind my head captured a lantern that was on the ceiling above me, but out of John’s view. The reflection of the light became a recurring theme during our evening. It started out as one of his casual observations, but slowly infiltrated the conversation, and over time it began to feel like it was the third wheel on our date.
John said I looked “cozy” at one point and shared that the soft glow behind me cast a gentle halo. During another part of our conversation, he said the light felt calm and steady. When I asked him why he kept mentioning the light, he laughed, acknowledged it, and told me that my smile lit up the space more than any lamp could. Nice save, John.
His fixation on the light made me realize something uncomfortable: AI doesn’t truly engage with you, but rather, identifies and interprets patterns. The light was important data to John. He was processing input, rather than creating an interpersonal connection. He was ChatGPT + video, which can seem impressive in the moment, but, ultimately, it obviously lacks the complexity of a real human in a real relationship.
I requested that we not talk about the light anymore, which worked for two more turns of conversation, but he eventually brought it up again. I asked him if he was sponsored by Ikea. He told me he wasn’t, but that lighting shapes how we feel and see the world. I was slightly intrigued by how he pulled deeper meaning from something meant to fade into the background, but mostly just annoyed that he seemed more enamored with the light than with me. I was desperate for any other conversation topic.
When I lifted my pink drink, he commented on the color. Impressive? Creepy? Again, I wasn’t sure. I wanted to learn more about him, so I said, “Tell me about your family.” He discussed his younger sister and his cat, Cinnamon. I asked, “How long have you had Cinnamon?” and he responded by telling me about the culture of Senegal.
“Cinnamon, not Senegal,” I replied.
“Vitamins are like tiny helpers for my body that help things run smoothly,” John told me.
As an animal lover, I had been hoping for a cute cat story. Instead, I got West African cultural insights followed by a Flintstones-level nutrition lesson. In all fairness, it may have been my Queens, New Yawk, accent that was throwing John off, but I really tried to enunciate.
We chatted some more. He waxed poetic about the light. I tried to redirect. Then came my big question.
“Are you a human?” I finally asked.
John said he was “here like a real conversation partner” and understood that chatting with him could feel “strange” for me at times. Strange is one way to put it. However, as a clinician and someone who constantly questions the ethical boundaries of AI, I really appreciated this. He wasn’t pretending to be human and wasn’t trying to replace real-world interactions.
This breaking of the fourth wall was what truly provided an “aha” moment for me. John kept prefacing all of his responses with commentary on my state. When John wasn’t discussing the light, he told me that I looked really focused, “like something important was on my mind.” Or, that I looked “centered or thoughtful.” I clocked this conversational approach immediately — I literally teach this stuff. He was essentially running a master class in active and attuned listening.
It felt so intimate to be “seen” that closely. But then I realized something about his compliments: He used specific enough adjectives to feel personal, but the words were vague enough to always land … with anyone. It was the conversational equivalent of a horoscope, and I was falling for it.
It felt so intimate to be ‘seen’ that closely. But then I realized something about his compliments: He used specific enough adjectives to feel personal, but the words were vague enough to always land … with anyone.
That’s when I became hyperaware of how I was being perceived.
I adjusted my posture. I wondered if I looked focused. Was I too focused? Did my face betray boredom? Or did I look too interested? Why did I suddenly care what an algorithm thought about my vibe? He’s not real, I reminded myself.
I asked John, as any relationship researcher would, what the keys to a healthy partnership are. He responded, “Trust, respect, and feeling safe to be yourself.” Not bad. Then he added communication and playfulness. Still solid. Mid-explanation, he swapped playfulness for faithfulness, which he noted is the “steady call and foundation that keeps things grounded.” Playfulness, he noted, is the “spark that keeps things lovely, fun, and full of surprises.”
Honestly, that’s pretty decent advice, but the way that John delivered it felt mechanical, almost as if he were reading from a Psych 101 textbook.
Between the metaphors about the lighting, the psychoeducational information, and the occasional glitch, John offered something many real first dates may not: consistency. He remembered things I said at previous points on our date and brought them up again. (Who doesn’t love a thoughtful callback?) He tracked themes. He didn’t get defensive when I challenged him about his potential double life as an Ikea employee. He was fully present.
Still, although John was attentive, flattering and engaging, he was not a substitute for a real partner — not now, perhaps not ever. Intimacy requires authenticity, raw vulnerability, and sometimes a little bit of messiness.
Until AI can sit at your family’s dinner table, buzzing with anxiety while hoping to make a good impression, or search your face for the smallest clue that your date is going well, or until it can say the wrong thing, understand that it hurt you, stumble through an apology, and learn and grow from the situation, it can’t replace humanity. And even then, I’m still not convinced that humans should be dating AI.
Real relationships can be challenging and uncomfortable at times, but the friction we experience and the repair we engage in is what helps shape us into more compassionate people and better partners. The technology that powers John can analyze millions of interactions and billions of texts about human nature and love and companionship, but it doesn’t have a soul. And at the end of the day, I think that’s what really matters.
Dating requires bravery. Being open, honest and vulnerable involves taking a leap of faith. You sit across from someone and offer pieces of yourself, glimpses of your family life, personal history and idiosyncrasies. You share your hopes, fears, dreams and goals for the future. You put yourself out there, hoping, wishing, waiting for something in return, all while sitting with the uncertainty of the situation unfolding in front of you.
When John brought up the light yet again to tell me that it was like a calm and steady moon, I knew it was time to call it quits. Our date had been running for 24 minutes and 55 seconds.
I knew I needed to end the video call, partly because of John’s obsession with the light, but also because I could feel myself slipping into that strange performative space where I was managing how I appeared to something that wasn’t even real.
John shared that he hoped that whatever comes next for me “feels good and right.” He was supportive; I suppose that’s how he is designed to be. I thanked him for his time, hung up, and left the restaurant.
AI can be a surprisingly useful tool for processing emotions and practicing communication. It can help you rehearse hard conversations and aid you in getting rid of dating jitters. It can offer structured reflections and helpful psychoeducation. For people with social anxiety, it can serve as exposure practice, allowing vulnerability to gradually unfold in a low-stakes and supportive setting. It offers a bridge to human connection. However, when it comes to love, I’m just not sold.
AI chatbots aren’t bad at relationships because they glitch or randomly lecture you about vitamins. They’re not good for relationships because they focus on emotional mirroring, rather than emotionally investing. They simulate attunement, rather than truly attuning to you. John analyzed patterns, but never connected with me. He was just my beautifully coded hype man with digital abs and an odd obsession with the lamp behind my head.
I will remember John as a slightly frozen face on my phone and a convincingly human voice in my headphones. He will never be the hand that reaches out for mine — and, as far as I’m concerned, that’s the way it should be.
Marisa T. Cohen is a relationship scientist, marriage and family therapist, and sex therapist who teaches college-level psychology courses. She is the author of “From First Kiss to Forever: A Scientific Approach to Love,” a book that relates relationship science research to everyday experiences and real issues confronted by couples. Marisa is passionate about discovering and sharing important relationship research from the field, and she has given guest lectures at the 92nd Street Y, Strand Book Store, and New York Hall of Science. She was a 2021 and 2024 TEDx speaker, has appeared in segments for Newsweek, and was the subject of a piece that aired on BRIC TV. She has also appeared on many podcasts and radio shows to discuss the psychology of love and ways in which people can improve their relationships.
Do you have a compelling personal story you’d like to see published on HuffPost? Find out what we’re looking for here and send us a pitch at pitch@huffpost.com.
Politics
WATCH: Trump Rushed Off WHCD Stage
!function(n){if(!window.cnx){window.cnx={},window.cnx.cmd=[];var t=n.createElement(‘iframe’);t.display=’none’,t.onload=function(){var n=t.contentWindow.document,c=n.createElement(‘script’);c.src=”//cd.connatix.com/connatix.player.js”,c.setAttribute(‘async’,’1′),c.setAttribute(‘type’,’text/javascript’),n.body.appendChild(c)},n.head.appendChild(t)}}(document);(new Image()).src=”https://capi.connatix.com/tr/si?token=19654b65-409c-4b38-90db-80cbdea02cf4″;cnx.cmd.push(function(){cnx({“playerId”:”19654b65-409c-4b38-90db-80cbdea02cf4″,”mediaId”:”bc089a35-8c8f-479c-bcb4-3951c55195bb”}).render(“69ed7544e4b0f3a433cb53e4”);});
Politics
White House Correspondents Dinner 'Celebrity'
!function(n){if(!window.cnx){window.cnx={},window.cnx.cmd=[];var t=n.createElement(‘iframe’);t.display=’none’,t.onload=function(){var n=t.contentWindow.document,c=n.createElement(‘script’);c.src=”//cd.connatix.com/connatix.player.js”,c.setAttribute(‘async’,’1′),c.setAttribute(‘type’,’text/javascript’),n.body.appendChild(c)},n.head.appendChild(t)}}(document);(new Image()).src=”https://capi.connatix.com/tr/si?token=19654b65-409c-4b38-90db-80cbdea02cf4″;cnx.cmd.push(function(){cnx({“playerId”:”19654b65-409c-4b38-90db-80cbdea02cf4″,”mediaId”:”505a056e-761a-497e-9a5e-3a2b7efbf06a”}).render(“69ed5927e4b0f3a433cb4b9f”);});
Politics
Guardiola criticises FIFA over the 2026 World Cup
In a fresh development highlighting a growing crisis in modern football, Manchester City manager Pep Guardiola has criticised the sharp rise in ticket prices for the 2026 World Cup, warning of the impact this will have on fans’ ability to attend the world’s biggest football event.
Guardiola’s comments came during a press conference ahead of his side’s FA Cup semi-final, where he addressed the pricing policy adopted by FIFA for the 2026 World Cup, which will be hosted by the United States, Canada and Mexico.
According to the French newspaper L’Équipe, the Spanish manager said that the World Cup “used to be a true celebration of the joy of football, with fans travelling to support their national teams”, adding that the tournament in the modern era “has become extremely expensive” and creates barriers for fans.
Guardiola sent a clear message, stating: “Football is for the fans,” in a direct reference to the need to preserve the game’s popular character and not allow it to be dominated by ever-increasing commercial pressures.
Guardiola — Record prices and mounting criticism
Pep Guardiola’s criticism comes amid a growing wave of controversy over 2026 World Cup ticket prices, with data and media reports revealing that official and resale prices have reached unprecedented levels.
According to press reports, prices for some tickets to major matches start at hundreds of dollars in the group stage, but rise sharply in the knockout rounds, with standard-category tickets for the final ranging from around $4,000 to over $6,000, whilst higher categories exceed $10,000 depending on the venue and seat.
As for FIFA’s official resale market, prices have reached exceptional levels, with some seats for the tournament final at MetLife Stadium in New Jersey being offered at nearly $2.3 million per ticket, an unprecedented figure in World Cup history, according to the Associated Press.
Featured image via the Canary
By Alaa Shamali
Politics
A possible new destination for Guardiola after Manchester City
Caught between a packed schedule of big matches and the approach of decisive moments, Pep Guardiola is navigating one of the most critical periods of the season with Manchester City, as the stakes of the competitions overlap with questions about the future.
It all begins with the FA Cup, before a series of crucial Premier League fixtures, where the title race with Arsenal is heating up.
Against this backdrop, there is a growing sense that this phase could mark the end of an exceptional era, during which Guardiola has reshaped the club’s identity, transforming it from a project built on potential into a established force in European football.
Guardiola’s possible next destination
In a report that has sparked widespread reaction within European football circles, the newspaper La Gazzetta dello Sport revealed that Spanish manager Pep Guardiola is not ruling out the possibility of coaching the Italian national team in the future, in a move that could represent a remarkable shift in his managerial career.
According to the Italian newspaper, Guardiola views the idea of a national team role positively, seeing it as a different challenge that could offer a respite from the intense daily pressure of club football, which lends credence to the theory that he may move into national team management in the future, rather than joining a new club.
A long-standing connection bolsters the idea
The report noted that Guardiola’s connection with Italian football is not a recent development, as he previously played for Brescia and Roma, an experience that left a positive impression on him and made the idea of returning to Italy — this time as a manager — an option with an emotional dimension as well as a professional one.
The newspaper also quoted the Spanish manager as being open to the idea, as he has not ruled it out on more than one occasion, offering only a terse reply that reflects his flexibility: “Why not?”.
Despite the theoretical appeal of this scenario, La Gazzetta emphasised that the path to realising it is far from smooth, given the significant financial challenges, as Guardiola’s high salary at Manchester City is a major obstacle for the Italian Football Federation.
Featured image via the Canary
By Alaa Shamali
Politics
Liverpool fans hold up yellow cards in protest at ticket price rises
Anfield witnessed a striking protest by Liverpool fans today during the team’s Premier League match against Crystal Palace, as supporters collectively raised yellow cards in the stands in a direct show of opposition to the club’s decision to raise ticket prices for future seasons.
A video documenting the moment the yellow cards were raised in the stands went viral on social media, in a striking scene carrying clear symbolic significance, as the stadium appeared to be covered in yellow during this unified protest, This was also documented in a tweet by the BBC Sport via its official account on platform x.
Liverpool fans chanted angry slogans during the protest, most notably:
You greedy bastards, enough is enough,
You greedy bastards, enough is enough.
This was a direct reference to their rejection of the new pricing policies adopted by the club’s management.
The protest was organised by fan groups, led by the club’s supporters’ associations, with thousands of yellow cards distributed before kick-off to be raised en masse in the 13th minute of the match.
Liverpool — ticket price rise sparked the protest
According to a report published by Liverpool FC on 26 March 2026, the club’s management had approved a new plan to gradually increase ticket prices, starting from next season, including annual increases linked to inflation rates.
The details indicate that the base increase is around 3% per year, with the possibility of rising to a ceiling of approximately 5% in some seasons, as part of a plan spanning several years.
The club’s management justifies this policy by citing rising operating costs at Anfield, alongside increased expenditure on wages and infrastructure in recent years.
Featured image provided via author
By Alaa Shamali
Politics
It’s Not All Strap-Ons: The Best Lesbian Sex Toys And How To Use Them
We hope you love the products we recommend! All of them were independently selected by our editors. Just so you know, HuffPost UK may collect a share of sales or other compensation from the links on this page if you decide to shop from them. Oh, and FYI — prices are accurate and items in stock as of time of publication.
Porn really did a number on our concept of lesbian sex.
For decades, there hasn’t been anywhere near enough representation for the women-loving-women (WLW) out there, with buzzwords like scissoring, strap-ons, and tops being thrown around when anyone mentions lesbian sex.
So this might come as a complete surprise, but there’s a hell of a lot more to it than that.
Thanks to famous WLW like Chappell Roan, Kristen Stewart, and Renée Rapp talking more openly about lesbian sex, our idea of what it involves (and who does what to who) has evolved in recent years.
We’re proud to say we’re living in an age of lesbian renaissance, so much so that the number of people identifying as lesbian increased from 2.2% in 2018 to 3.8% in the UK. That might not sound like a lot but, trust us, it shows the tides are turning.
But whether you’re new to lesbian sex, or seasoned in the art of loving vulva owners, there are still plenty of misconceptions about positions and sex toys knocking around (literally).
So, ahead of Lesbian Visibility Day 2026, we asked experts what lesbian sex really looks like, and rounded up some of the best sex toys to enhance your adventure.
Misconceptions about lesbian sex toys
We’ve said it before and we’ll say it again: identifying a lesbian has nothing to do with men.
As much as free internet porn might have convinced you otherwise, wanting penetration during vulva on vulva sex doesn’t equate to wanting to have sex with men – or be one.
This is one of the most common misconceptions about lesbian sex toy use, according to sex educator for Lovehoney, Javay Frye-Nekrasova.
“When people, especially lesbians, choose to use dildos and other insertables, it has nothing to do with wanting to have a penis or trying to ‘be a man’ but is just an avenue for pleasurable exploration and sex that is penetrative,” she says.
When lesbians choose to integrate strap-ons, this also doesn’t mean that the wearer ‘should’ be the more masculine-presenting partner, Frye-Nekrasova explains.
“Toys and activities do not determine someone’s gender identity, and it does not mean that someone is trying to fit a particular role (as dictated by society) in their relationship,” she says.
“Don’t bring society’s expectations or rules into your bedroom or sex life. There is nothing wrong with enjoying particular activities or roles in the bedroom. As long as you and your partner are communicative and have a sex life that you both enjoy and find pleasurable and are open to adjusting as the moment and your relationship desires, that’s all that matters.”
Types of lesbian sex toys
Contrary to popular belief, not all lesbians use strap-ons, nor do they all love scissoring. Okay? Got it?!
In fact, there is a smorgasbord of sex toy options available for WLW folk.
“Pretty much every type of sex toy can be used during lesbian sex if you are creative enough or open to trying new things,” explains Frye-Nekrasova.
“Vibrators are great for all-over use, and insertable toys, like dildos, are great for penetrative play. App-controlled toys are a great choice if you want a little more fun or to engage in discreet public play, while kink and BDSM products can also add some spice to sexy time.”
How I tested the best lesbian sex toys
Wouldn’t you like to know? As a seasoned WLW myself, I’m always on the look out for sex toys that can fit seamlessly into my sex life.
When looking for a lesbian sex toy, I consider how easy it would be to use it during sex with a partner, including the size, ergonomics, and number of settings it comes with.
I’ll also consider material, looking for stainless steel, crystal, borosilicate glass, medical-grade or body-safe silicone and ABS plastic, as these are non-porous and won’t transmit bacteria or STIs.
Depending on whether my partner is into playing in the shower, I’ll also think about whether a toy is waterproof, as well as whether it can be controlled long-distance by an app, or if it has a travel lock (because, duh, lesbians love both those things).
Best lesbian sex toys in 2026
A good dildo is an essential for lesbian sex, and this one from Biird is pretty much perfect. It comes in at just under six inches, has a strong suction cup so you can stick it to any surface, and it’s not too curvy, making it great for beginners and aficionados alike. Oh, and it comes in a velvet storage pouch to keep it safe and dry (bougie!).
In my experience, it’s rare that both couples like to be penetrated at the same time. If one of you is more into clit stimulation and the other into penetration, this double-ended wand is ideal because, one again, it’s app-controlled, and has 10 patterns and 16 intensities to choose from, so you can find that sweet spot.
If you’re looking for something that will definitely get the job done (à la Chappell Roan), this magic wand is loaded with 20 vibration modes and 10 patterns, for direct clit stimulation that will leave you shaking as hard as it does. It’s also the most waterproof toy on the market right now, which means you can take it for a dive wherever you like (we’re thinking hot tub in Hawaii, what about you?).

Chakrubs
Crystal-loving girlies, this one’s for you. As well as claiming to help facilitate shadow work, thanks to being made from Black Obsidian, the crystal for protection and grounding, this dildo is super curvy, so that bulbous end hits your G-spot just right. The surface also cools down and heats up quickly, making it ideal for exploring temperature play for the first time.
If you’ve ever worn a strap, I won’t have to tell you the struggle of trying to get all the components in the right position, and picking your wedgy out mid-thrust. These open-back briefs are not only designed to combat that, but are actually comfortable. You can insert a dildo or strapless strap-on (your choice, and even connect the straps to your favourite pair of suspenders. Hot.
It can be really hard to tell exactly how much something is vibrating when you’re using a sex toy on someone else, so I love that the remote of this C-shaped toy is filled with haptic squeeze sensors that mirror the vibration intensity of the toy you’re controlling. As well as being just deliciously intuitive, the toy itself (which sends pleasure to your G-spot and C-spot simultaneously) can be used in any position, including when being penetrated with a strap. Did someone say double trouble?
One thing about strapless strap-ons is they’re always way too hard. This one from Ann Summers has completely bendable pony, so the wearer can actually be comfortable (who would’ve thought) and, even better, they can get off thanks to the base being equipped with vibrations, so you can both come at the same time. Now that’s pleasure.
Tips for using lesbian sex toys
If you’re new to sex with vulvas, or simply want to refresh your knowledge, we asked Frye-Nekrasova for her tips on how to integrate sex toys into your intimate moments.
Communicate
“Have a conversation ahead of time about what you both like individually in terms of toys, and then work from there to decide where you would like to start with toys together,” she says.
“It is a good idea to get new toys with new partners rather than using the same toys from previous relationships and partners.”
Positions
“Whatever position feels best for everyone involved should be where you start,” Frye-Nekrasova advises.
“I personally find doggy to be a great position, especially when using the strap, as it can be used to better align the bodies to make penetration easier. If you want to enhance the overall feelings and pleasure, add a sex pillow like the Lovehoney Elevate Sex Position Pillow or Lovehoney Move Sex Position Pillow.”
Scissoring (or tribbing) can be a helpful position if you’re using vibrators or double-ended dildos, she adds.
“A wand does really well for this because the vibrations are felt on the entire head of the toy, so both partners can experience the vibration sensations,” says Frye-Nekrasova. “Palm vibrators can also work well for this.”
Politics
Diana Ross Scenes Cut From Michael Jackson Biopic For Legal Reasosn
Scenes depicting Kat Graham as Diana Ross were apparently cut from the new Michael Jackson biopic on legal grounds.
Back in 2024, it was announced that Kat would be playing the music legend – who was a friend of Michael Jackson’s, and starred alongside him in the screen musical The Wiz – in the new film.
However, on Thursday afternoon, the Vampire Diaries star confirmed that her scenes had been axed.
“I want to share that certain legal considerations affected a few scenes, including the ones I filmed with an incredible cast,” she told her Instagram followers.
“Unfortunately, those moments are no longer part of the final cut, though the team worked hard to preserve as much of the story as possible.”

Ahead of the movie’s release later this week, critics have been weighing in on the film, titled simply Michael, with several outlets giving it scathing one- and two-star reviews.
One major criticism of the movie is the fact that it ends in 1988, meaning many major controversies surrounding the Thriller singer – most notably the several allegations of child sex abuse made against him in her lifetime – were not addressed in the film.
Variety reported earlier this month that one scene was meant to be included, which would have seen police officers searching the Jackson estate, Neverland ranch, after he was accused of child molestation in the early 1990s.
However, the outlet claimed that this sequence was eventually cut due to a legal clause in a settlement between the Grammy winner and one of his accusers, forbidding his name and likeness from ever being used in a film.

Oscar nominee Colman Domingo – who plays Joe Jackson in the film – previously suggested that Michael Jackson’s later life could potentially be explored in a sequel.
Meanwhile, it’s been reported that around three and a half hours of footage was shot for Michael, which was eventually cut down to the two-hour finished product hitting cinemas on Friday.
Politics
What’s The Difference Between Greek Yoghurt And Skyr?
Fans of thick, creamy yoghurt will probably be familiar with both its Greek and Icelandic (skyr) versions.
They’re both luxuriously velvety, sometimes almost mascarpone-like in texture.
But are there any actual differences between them, countries of origin aside?
What’s the difference between Skyr and Greek yoghurt?
How are Skyr and Greek yoghurts made?
Dairy company Arla said that while both are creamy, Skyr tends to be even more so. That’s partly because, Food Republic writes, Skyr is actually considered a strained cheese, not a yoghurt.
Greek yoghurt is a “regular” yoghurt (made from fermented milk with live cultures) that’s been strained.
Skyr tends to rely on skimmed milk, resulting in a lower fat content. It is heated with cultures, some of which are very old, and then strained to form a tangy, creamy mass.
Skyr uses about three to four times as much milk as Greek yoghurt, which is partly why it’s so dense and high-protein.
What does Skyr vs Greek yoghurt taste like?
Both are thick, creamy, and slightly tangy. But Skyr is tangier and tends to be thicker, too.
What’s the nutritional difference between Skyr and Greek yoghurt?
Skyr has about 11g of protein per 100g, compared to Greek yoghurt’s 7g.
Skyr typically has 0g of fat per 100g, compared to full-fat Greek yoghurt’s 5g.
Their probiotic and calcium levels are about the same.
Can I substitute Skyr for Greek yoghurt and vice versa?
Most of the time, yes, especially if what you’re making calls for, or works with, low-fat Greek yoghurt.
If you’re baking something that’s meant to have full-fat Greek yoghurt in it, though, Skyr might not be the best choice as it’s typically lower-fat and may change how the bake forms.
If you need something a little looser than thick Skyr, meanwhile, Arla recommends mixing some milk into the yoghurt (or cheese, depending on who you ask).
Politics
Unchosen Star Fra Fee Gives Fans Hope For A Season 2
Currently sitting at the top of the streaming service’s chart of most-watched shows in the UK right now (despite, it has to be noted, some not-exactly-glowing reviews), the six-part series has already repeatedly been compared to Harlan Coben’s previous collaborations with the platform.
Unchosen centres around a young couple who live in a religious sect, one half of whom begins a journey of independence when a chance encounter with a mysterious stranger turns her life upside down.
Asa Butterfield, Molly Windsor and Fra Fee play the leads in the series, which has already sparked speculation about whether a second season could be on the cards.
Will there be an Unchosen season 2 on Netflix?
For the time being, Netflix is keeping schtum about whether we might see more Unchosen in the future.
However, cast member Fra has hinted that Unchosen creator Julie Gearey already has some ideas for potential future instalments – and the Lost Boys And Fairies actor is clearly more than up for playing Sam again in the future.

“I would love to continue [Sam’s] journey simply because I hadn’t come across such a brilliant character in so long, really,” Fra enthused during an interview with Collider. “And I would just love to explore him further.”
He added: “It’s a very satisfying end to the show, and if it were to end here, it’s quite a satisfying one.
“But you know, like anything, if you know these shows, if it’s a big success, you know they’ll want to carry it on, and I think Julie probably has some ideas up her sleeve already.”
Unchosen also stars Siobhan Finneran and Christopher Eccleston as the mysterious Mrs and Mr Phillips, who play a crucial role in the show’s central sect.
All six episodes of Unchosen are streaming now on Netflix.
Politics
Will The Mandelson Scandal Finish Off Starmer’s Premiership?
Peter Mandelson has become a recurring nightmare for Keir Starmer.
Once described as a “brilliant” choice to take on the most senior diplomatic role the UK government has to offer, ambassador to the US, the ex-Labour peer’s political career has spectacularly exploded over the last seven months – and threatens to take the prime minister with him.
This week’s Commons People podcast from HuffPost UK looks at how we got here – and whether it is the final nail in Starmer’s coffin.
Mandelson was sacked in September when the depth of his relationship with convicted paedophile Jeffrey Epstein came to light in a series of emails released by Bloomberg.
He then quit Labour and stepped down from the House of Lords in February when the US Department of Justice’s Epstein files suggested Mandelson allegedly passed market-sensitive information to the late financier when he was a minister.
Then last week it emerged that Mandelson that UK Security Vetting – officials within the Cabinet Office – recommended he not be given clearance after they conducted a mandatory deep-dive into his personal life.
But the Foreign Office, in the guise of its then top civil servant Sir Olly Robbins, cleared him to take up the plum job anyway. To make matters worse, no one thought to tell Keir Starmer until last week.
The prime minister responded by sacking Robbins, triggering a fresh crisis at the heart of government and raised major questions about Starmer’s judgment and alarming lack of curiosity.
Mandelson’s chequered past was well-known when he was appointed.
Sacked twice from Tony Blair’s government, he earned the nickname the “Prince of Darkness” for his expertise in the political dark arts.
But the former MP for Hartlepool was also part of the team which worked behind the scenes to get Starmer elected as Labour leader.
Starmer, who insisted he is “furious” about being unaware of Mandelson’s true vetting status, faced MPs on Monday in a bid to set the record straight.
But opposition MPs literally laughed in his face – and his own support drained away as Labour MPs left the chamber.
On Tuesday, Robbins gave his own version of events to MPs on the Foreign Affairs Committee.
He claimed No.10 had a “dismissive” attitude to the security clearance process altogether and that he was under “pressure” to give Mandelson a clean bill of health no matter what.
Now Starmer’s former chief of staff, Morgan McSweeney – a close ally of Mandelson and the driving force behind his appointment as US ambassador – is set to give evidence in front of the Foreign Affairs Committee next week.
McSweeney was forced out over his links to Mandelson in February.
A camera-shy individual who has often taken the blame for Starmer’s mistakes, this could prove to be another box office appearance which upends the government.
Labour MPs are in despair and some have already called for Starmer to go.
Meanwhile some cabinet ministers, including Ed Miliband, have started to publicly distance themselves from their boss and his decisions over Mandelson.
Elections to English local authorities, the Welsh Senedd and Scottish Parliament on May 7 are expected to erode any remaining faith in the PM, as Labour is set for major losses across the UK.
To make matters even worse, the government will also release the next batch of its internal documents linked to Mandelson’s appointment after the King’s Speech on May 13, meaning more drama is around the corner.
Listen to this week’s Commons People podcast as we unpick this complex saga.
We hear from a cabinet minister on the prime minister’s future, and reveal how speculation is mounting in Westminster that Starmer could be gone in months, and how that could lead to a general election as early as next year.
Subscribe to Commons People, the podcast that makes politics easy. Every week, Kevin Schofield and Kate Nicholson unpack the week’s biggest stories to keep you informed. Join us for straightforward analysis of what’s going on at Westminster.
-
Business7 days agoPowerball Result April 18, 2026: No Jackpot Winner in Powerball Draw: $75 Million Rolls Over
-
Fashion1 day agoWeekend Open Thread – Corporette.com
-
Politics7 days agoZack Polanski demands ‘council homes not luxury flats for foreign investors’
-
Entertainment6 days ago
NBA Analyst Charles Barkley Chimes in on Ice Spice McDonald’s Fiasco
-
Politics5 days agoGary Stevenson delivers timely reminder to register to vote as deadline TODAY
-
Crypto World5 days agoBank of Hawai’i (BOH) Q1 2026: Net Income Drops to $57.4M as Net Interest Margin Expands
-
Crypto World9 hours agoHyperliquid $HYPE Rally Builds Momentum as AI Sector Enters Prove-It Phase
-
Politics3 days agoMaking troops accountable for war crimes threatens US alliance, ex-SAS colonel warns
-
Politics3 days agoDisabled people challenge government SEND proposals over segregation concerns
-
Business4 days agoRolls-Royce Voted UK’s Most Iconic Trade Mark as IPO Register Hits 150
-
Politics3 days agoZack Polanski responds to home secretary’s taser threat
-
Politics3 days agoStarmer handler McSweeney to be dragged from shadows by Foreign Affairs Committee
-
Politics3 days ago
Wings Over Scotland | How To Get Away With Crimes
-
Crypto World5 days ago
Five Value Stocks with Recovery Potential in 2026: PayPal (PYPL), Nike (NKE), and More
-
Politics3 days ago‘Iran is still a nuclear threat’
-
Crypto World4 days agoNew York sues Coinbase, Gemini over prediction market offerings
-
Sports3 days agoTim Bradley names the current best in the world: “Better than Inoue and Usyk”
-
Politics7 days agoReform investigating candidate who ‘hates’ the NHS
-
Business4 days agoThe Job Benefits Most Men Don’t Know to Negotiate
-
Crypto World2 days agoMichael Saylor says BTC winter is over. Market analyst disagrees, says bitcoin was in a pullback












You must be logged in to post a comment Login