Kacey Musgraves is catching heat online after fans criticized the lack of inclusive sizing in her new Walmart clothing collaboration. The country star’s newly launched Kacey Lee collection, created in partnership with denim brand Lee, officially dropped Tuesday and features more than 100 pieces ranging from women’s and men’s fashion to swimwear and pet accessories. But despite the affordable price points and Western-inspired aesthetic, the collection quickly sparked backlash after shoppers noticed limited size availability.

Much of the criticism centered around the collection’s sizing, which reportedly tops out at XXL for most tops and size 18 for bottoms. Social media creator and self-described “fat activist” Megan Ixim, who goes by @msgiggles, called out the collaboration in a video shared with her Instagram followers. Ixim said she was disappointed to discover that plus-size shoppers could not purchase most extended sizing in stores, while only select styles appeared available online.

According to listings on Walmart’s website, sizes larger than XXL appear to be primarily limited to portions of the swimwear collection, including select tops, bottoms, and one-piece swimsuits available in 2X and 3X via delivery.

Ixim argued the limited availability felt especially frustrating given Walmart’s established plus-size customer base and dedicated in-store sections. She also pointed to Musgraves’ previous collaboration with Reformation in 2024, which faced similar criticism over limited extended sizing.

Musgraves Responds To Growing Backlash

As criticism surrounding the collection spread online, Musgraves personally stepped into the conversation. Commenting under Ixim’s original video, the singer denied having control over the sizing decisions. “Hiii not in my control at all. Sorry you’re disappointed. Hope this helps!” Musgraves wrote, adding a pink heart emoji.

The response immediately sparked another wave of debate online, with some critics accusing the singer of sounding dismissive. “The way this response could have been respectful, but she went out of her way to make it rude,” one user wrote. “The ‘hope this helps’ is so lacking empathy. What is that comment supposed to help with?” another asked.

Kacey Musgraves Celebrated Collection Launch With Surprise Walmart Stop

Amid the buzz surrounding her new fashion line, Musgraves also hit the road to celebrate the launch in person. On Tuesday night, the Grammy winner surprised fans with an appearance at a Walmart Supercenter in Franklin, Tennessee, where she greeted shoppers and celebrated the debut of her exclusive “Kacey Lee” collection.

Fans who purchased pieces from the collection, along with copies of Musgraves’ new album, “Middle of Nowhere,” had the chance to meet the singer and score autographs during the event. One attendee, Jasmine Gaetano, praised Musgraves’ latest music, explaining that the album resonated with her personally. “I actually am, but I’m a newer fan, so this album that she did really pays homage to Mexican American music, and so I appreciate that, but yeah, I love her music,” Gaetano said.

Musgraves Says ‘Kacey Lee’ Felt Like A Natural Fit

Despite the controversy surrounding sizing, Musgraves has spoken enthusiastically about the inspiration behind the collection and why the partnership felt personal to her. In a release announcing the collaboration, the singer revealed the project held sentimental meaning, beginning with the fact that “Lee” is actually her middle name.

“The idea of this capsule excited me, not only because my middle name is ‘Lee,’ but because it feels very nostalgic,” Musgraves shared. “I grew up wearing Lee and I wear a lot of denim, vintage tees and workwear, so this partnership felt like a natural fit.”

The country star also said she was heavily involved in shaping the designs, looking for ways to weave pieces of her personality and even her songwriting into the collection. “I loved collaborating on the designs and finding ways to incorporate my lyrics and elements of my personality,” she explained.

For Musgraves, the goal was simple: create pieces she would genuinely wear herself. “The goal is always to design pieces I would personally wear, and I know y’all will love it as much as I do,” she said.

Kacey Musgraves Is Also Entering A New Music Era

The launch of Kacey Lee comes during a busy moment for Musgraves professionally. The collection arrived alongside the release of her newest album, “Middle of Nowhere,” which dropped on May 1 and marks the seventh studio album of her career.

Musgraves also recently announced a supporting U.S. tour, which is set to kick off on August 20 in Chicago before wrapping on October 27 in Seattle.

Tom Cruise’s War of the Worlds is now streaming on HBO Max, where it is currently the 7th most popular film.

By Phillip Moyer
| Published 37 seconds ago

Tom Cruise is known for a lot of things: the Mission: Impossible spy film series, the Top Gun movies, and his role in A Few Good Men, to name a few. However, his effects-heavy 2005 blockbuster, War of the Worlds, fell off the radar soon after its release. It deserves better.

The movie is an adaptation of the 1898 book of the same name by H. G. Wells, detailing an alien invasion of Earth using tall tripod-like war machines. The film generally follows the book’s plot, though it does so in the modern era, with humans using modern technology to fight the aliens rather than late-19th-century artillery. It uses Tom Cruise’s everyman character, Ray Ferrier, to show the destruction and futility of the fight.

There had been several adaptations of War of the Worlds before Tom Cruise starred in the 2005 version. This includes a 1953 film and multiple direct-to-video films released in 2005 to capitalize on Cruise’s movie. The most famous adaptation was the 1938 Orson Welles radio drama that convinced some listeners they were hearing a newscast rather than a fictional story. 

Audience And Critical Reception In 2005

Tom Cruise’s take on War of the Worlds was fairly well-received when it was released, earning more than $600 million on a $132 million budget. That made it the fourth-most-watched movie of 2005 and should have guaranteed War of the Worlds a permanent spot in the public consciousness. That didn’t happen.

It also earned generally positive (though not enthusiastic) reviews. There were complaints about some elements of the film’s plot, including the unexpectedly positive ending that didn’t seem earned. While part of this comes from the original book’s plot, the fact that everyone Ray Ferrier loves gets through the apocalyptic war unscathed was almost enough to take viewers out of the entire experience.

Why Tom Cruise’s War Of The Worlds Has Been Forgotten

After the film left theaters, it almost disappeared from public consciousness. Tom Cruise went on to star in Mission: Impossible III the next year and continued on as if his War of the Worlds had never happened. 

The movie is relentlessly bleak, emotionally cold, and built around panic rather than wonder, which made it hard for audiences to revisit the way they revisited films like Jurassic Park or Independence Day. Tom Cruise’s increasingly bizarre public image during the film’s release also poisoned its long-term reputation. The Oprah couch-jumping era, which was around the same time, became inseparable from the movie itself.

Most importantly, 2005 was one of the last years where studios could still brute-force gigantic box office numbers through sheer event marketing. War of the Worlds was sold as mandatory viewing, but not as something people would build fandoms around afterward. It made money because everyone showed up opening weekend. Then almost nobody talked about it again.

 Star Wars: Episode III – Revenge of the Sith and Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire were also released in 2005, as were Batman Begins and The 40-Year-Old Virgin. Those movies simply overshadowed it. They had a larger cultural footprint. Tom Cruise’s star power helped bring people into theaters, but it didn’t help keep the film in their minds after they left. 

By Chris Snellgrove
| Published 11 seconds ago

After James Gunn’s Superman became last summer’s biggest movie and the most successful solo Superman movie ever made, all but the most cultish Snyder Bros had to admit that the nascent DCU improved on the failed DCEU in almost every way. James Gunn’s Superman presented its title character as a flawed icon of hope, one who seemed the deliberate antithesis of Henry Cavill’s Man of Steel. Moreover, his real superpower was clearly optimism, which had an infectiously wholesome effect on the audience. “Isn’t this more fun to watch,” we thought, “than seeing Batman hit him with a grimy bathroom sink?”

Unfortunately, there are early signs that the DCU may make some of the same unforced errors the DCEU made. For example, Lars Eidinger will be playing Brainiac in the upcoming Superman: The Man of Tomorrow, and he recently told The Hollywood Reporter a bit more about his bionic Big Bad. “Brainiac is described as the incarnation of Satan,” he said.

If that is true, then it would position Superman as a Jesus-like figure, destined to defy and ultimately defeat his satanic foe. That sounds neat on paper, but it also echoes the most uncomfortable part of the DCEU: Zack Snyder’s bizarre insistence that Superman be Jesus Christ in a cape.

Could It Be…Satan?

In his interview with The Hollywood Reporter, Lars Eindinger didn’t give too many details about Superman: The Man of Tomorrow or the supervillain he is playing. He simply said, “Brainiac is described as the incarnation of Satan. I find that almost Shakespearean.” That’s high praise coming from this particular actor: if you didn’t know, Eidinger is most famous as a theatre actor, one who has received the most acclaim for his performance as the title character of Hamlet. Therefore, his description of Brainiac as Satan may be his own florid description, or maybe he’s quoting a throwaway bit of characterization from writer/director James Gunn.

Still, taken at face value, the idea of Brainiac being a symbolic Satan has me worried for Superman: The Man of Tomorrow. Not because it’s innately offensive or anything; in fact, if Gunn can come up with something interesting to say by Christian-coding his summer tentpole blockbuster, I’d love to hear it. But, with respect to Lex Luthor, the primary appeal of this sequel is seeing Superman fight Braniac. You don’t have to have gone to Sunday school as a kid to know that if Brainiac is Satan, that would, biblically speaking, make Superman Jesus. Unfortunately, DC has an awful history of turning its most famous superhero into a hackneyed Christ metaphor.

So Help Me, Jesus

In The Man of Steel, we see Superman strike multiple poses (like when he’s flying) that make him look like he’s being crucified. He is 33 years old in the film, making him the same age Jesus was when he struggled with the fact that he had to die to save the world. Obviously, Superman later did die to save the world when he defeated Doomsday, but not before receiving a spear wound to his side, Christ-like. Inevitably, he was also brought back to life after his noble sacrifice, cementing his weird onscreen journey as a superhero version of Jesus. 

Even by itself, this was a hack, over-the-top metaphor that made it hard to take Henry Cavill’s Superman seriously. Additionally, the metaphor clashed with so many other aspects of the character. If Superman is Jesus, why can’t he find another way to stop Zod but kill him? If he is a Christ figure who joyfully dies to save humanity, why does he seem downright bored saving people at the beginning of Batman v. Superman? For that matter, what’s up with Superman becoming a global tyrant if Lois Lane dies? Snyder treated his favorite hero more like the Joker, implying that super-Jesus is just one bad day away from going super-crazy.

Too Early To Crucify Anyone

None of this is meant to trample anyone’s faith, of course. But it’s just a little uncomfortable seeing Superman deciding to suit up while getting a pep talk in a church, beneath a stained-glass image of Jesus.

Decades after Alan Moore’s seminal Watchmen reminded us how terrifying an American god would actually be,  Zack Snyder comes along to say it’s cool as long as he looks good and gets to do a little murder every now and then (you know, as a treat). Worse, the director does it in a way that arguably cheapens the character while insulting Jesus, someone whose onscreen analog can only defeat his biggest foes by outright murdering them. 

So far, though, fans must just have (ahem) a little faith in James Gunn. In Superman, the title character was kinder, gentler, and infinitely more human than his DCEU predecessor, and it would be downright odd if all of that changed in Superman: The Man of Tomorrow. With any luck, the next movie will be another successful entry in the only franchise that can truly give Marvel a run for its money.

If I want more than luck, though, I may just have to pray on the matter. Any suggestions on who I should pray to, though? Because that big, out-of-work guy in the flag-colored pajamas looks pretty pissed at the idea of helping anyone.

By Robert Scucci
| Published 13 seconds ago

When was the last time you watched 2001’s The Mummy Returns? Be honest. It’s probably been about 20 years because you saw it when it first came out and thought the special effects looked like early PlayStation graphics. That was my experience anyway: watch it once, never again. Well, I’m a never say never kind of guy, and decided to revisit what I assumed would be a total punisher of a film. Surprisingly, it holds up shockingly well.

Here’s the thing about CGI-heavy movies from the early aughts: they’re disproportionately ambitious when you consider how limited the technology was back then, and it’s hard to reconcile what the movie intended to look like with what actually made it to the screen. These days, the trick seems to be making everything as dark as humanly possible to obscure filmmakers’ reliance on CGI, and honestly, that looks worse.

Upon revisiting The Mummy Returns, my first thought was that it looks really cool. Not in the sense that it looks great, but in the sense that writer-director Stephen Sommers and Universal Pictures were at least brave enough to show us what we’re looking at, rough edges and all. It’s a PG-13, family-friendly, big-budget fantasy action flick, and it plays out exactly how you’d expect.

It’s not Brendan Fraser’s finest hour, but I’ll gladly sit down with my kids and watch this one because, at the end of the day, it’s a supremely fun, low-stakes movie.

Picks Up 7 Years After The First One

The Mummy Returns picks up seven years after the first film, but first we’re introduced to The Scorpion King (Dwayne Johnson in his film acting debut) in 3067 B.C. His world domination plot fails, and he makes a deal with Anubis so he can continue down the war path, only to get double-crossed the second he conquers Egypt. He and his army of CGI jackals get sucked into the underworld, and that’s all we hear from him for a hot minute.

Back in the present day, which is 1933 in The Mummy Returns lore, we’re reintroduced to an older, wiser, and more cautious Rick O’Connell (Brendan Fraser). Wanting very much to put his treasure-hunting days behind him, Rick would like to settle down with his wife Evelyn (Rachel Weisz), now that the two of them have a 7-year-old son together, Alex (Freddie Boath). Evelyn, the thrill seeker that she is, wants to continue tracking down ancient ruins and artifacts, namely the Bracelet of Anubis, who, if you remember what I said in the previous paragraph, is the ruler of the underworld who had that run-in with The Scorpion King. Something that spectacularly comes into play later.

They find the bracelet, Alex tries it on, and it sets off a constantly escalating chain of events. Evelyn is kidnapped by a cult connected to the original film’s antagonist, Imhotep (Arnold Vosloo), who hopes to gain control of Anubis’ army. The leader of the cult, Baltus (Alun Armstrong), brings along his enforcer, Lock-Nah (Adewale Akinnouye-Agbaje), as well as Meela Nais (Patricia Velasquez), who just so happens to be the physical reincarnation of Imhotep’s ancient lover, Anck-su-namun. 

Joining in on the fun are Evelyn’s brother Jonathan (John Hannah), and Medjai chieftain Ardeth Bay (Oded Fehr), who help navigate all of this ancient tomfoolery while providing comic relief. From this point forward, we get blasted with CGI monkey bridge explosions, giant sandstorm faces, Brendan Fraser chewing scenery, and a sensible amount of one-liners while navigating treacherous landscapes.

It’s Not What It’s Lacking, It’s What It’s Trying To Attempt

This is where I talk about how glad I am that I rewatched The Mummy Returns. In the grand scheme of things, the special effects aren’t terrible. The film is clearly dated, and some sequences land better than others. Evelyn’s flashbacks and the visions Alex experiences thanks to the Bracelet of Anubis are genuinely cool to look at, especially when ancient times are superimposed over the 1933 timeline.

However, the third-act sequences involving a reinvigorated and pissed-off Scorpion King stomping through the scenery are beyond rough. I can’t in good conscience say it looks great or even passable, but also, I don’t care, because up to this point we’ve been on the adventure of a lifetime. I didn’t realize until my adult viewing of this film that I kind of like it this way. It’s a movie that requires you to suspend a monolithic amount of disbelief, so moments like this don’t really take away from the storytelling because everything is already so ridiculous in the first place.

The best part about The Mummy Returns, though, is Brendan Fraser, who never misses, even when he does. He has the whole reluctant hero thing down pat here, and most of the laugh-out-loud moments come from that kind of characterization. For my money, there’s nothing better than watching somebody who’s intimidatingly good at what they do, mowing down legions of undead CGI monkey things, but is only showcasing those skills because he wants to go home and relax. I identify with that more than you could possibly imagine.

As of this writing, you can stream The Mummy Returns on Peacock and Max. It’s also available through other streamers like Hulu, The Roku Channel, and Amazon Prime Video, though some require add-ons or bundles, or additional on-demand purchases. 

By Chris Snellgrove
| Published 2 minutes ago

Star Trek is often seen as a left-wing franchise. Thanks to cutting-edge technology (including replicators that can make anything you need), this moneyless society is often considered the embodiment of the old meme “Fully Automated Luxury Gay Space Communism.” With that being said, Trek has a far larger number of right-wing fans, and this often leads sections of the fandom to ask a simple question: “Why do conservatives watch Star Trek?” After trawling old messageboards and subreddits long enough, I found a tentative answer.

The general consensus online is that liberals like Star Trek for its emphasis on diversity and its portrayal of different groups coming together to solve problems through diplomacy and cultural understanding. Meanwhile, conservatives allegedly like Trek because they see Starfleet as a symbol of America and enjoy watching captains warping in and saving otherwise helpless alien societies (basically, world police on a galactic scale). As you might imagine, the internet considers these positions to be polar opposites. But Star Trek is all about Infinite Diversity in Infinite Combinations, and, in an ironic twist, the franchise has proven that both liberal and conservative readings of its text are, more or less, correct!

Is Star Trek Left-Wing?

It’s not that hard to see why many consider Star Trek to be a left-wing franchise. Characters like Kirk and Picard have frequently insisted that their futuristic society has moved beyond the need or desire for money (this is largely thanks to the replicator). In this way, Trek thoroughly rejects capitalism, and writers go out of their way to mock 21st-century-style greed. The best example of this is the Ferengi, who are explicitly portrayed as a caricature of capitalist culture and, accordingly, always turned into the butt of the joke.

Star Trek also fully aligns with diversity, both in the stories (again, the future is all about IDIC) and its casting. Back in the ‘60s, The Original Series made Nichelle Nichols into an international icon, and she stayed on the show after Martin Luther King, Jr. told her that what she was doing (being a prominent Black actor during the Civil Rights era) was just as important as marching in the streets for freedom. Trek continued to emphasize diversity in the decades since, with the inclusion of more prominent Black characters, gay characters, trans characters, nonbinary characters, etc. 

Finally, Star Trek often rejects prominent conservative values. Not only is Christianity practically non-existent in this franchise, but religion is often portrayed as a dangerous tool used to control others (like Kai Winn trying to force the Bajoran gospel in the classroom). Exceptionalism is more or less non-existent, with characters like Spock reminding us that no one person’s life is worth more than saving the lives of others.

Trek also rejects the notion of cowboy diplomacy: Kirk spends a lifetime shooting at Klingons and resents them for killing his son, but in The Undiscovered Country, he realizes the importance of laying his weapons down, forgiving his enemies, and using diplomacy to create a better future for billions of people.

Is Star Trek Right-Wing?

Star Trek still has great appeal to conservative audiences. For one thing, Star Trek has always stressed the importance of hierarchy, which is part and parcel to right-wing thought. We know exactly who’s in charge at all times, and that chain of command is frequently portrayed as vital to everyone’s survival.

Speaking of which, Starfleet is (despite the nominal emphasis on science and exploration) clearly the embodiment of Federation military might. Notably, we haven’t gotten any Trek series focusing on random space hippies; instead, we keep getting shows and movies focused on heroic military officers fighting hostile nations, terrorists, and other extremists, which clearly appeals to conservatives.

While Star Trek acknowledges the importance of diversity, the vast majority of the crew in any show or film are human. This is even lampshaded in The Undiscovered Country, in which the Federation is described as “nothing more than a homo sapiens only club.”

In general, human characters are easier for audiences of all stripes to relate to, but this arguably appeals more to conservatives. Not only does this franchise prominently feature tribalism, but it presents tribalism as necessary: now that humans have all united together, we have an easier time helping everyone in the galaxy learn and grow thanks to our superior wisdom.

That leads to the final point: Star Trek really is mostly about humans (most of them straight, white, and male) warping around the galaxy and solving everyone’s problems. In every alternate universe where Starfleet doesn’t exist (the Mirror Universe, the alternate reality of Picard Season 2, even the changed future in “City On the Edge of Forever”), the entire galaxy goes to sh*t. If you accept the premise that Starfleet is a stand-in for America, then the franchise has spent the better part of a century showing how everything falls apart without the United States intervening. Honestly, is it any wonder that conservatives love this message?

Shaka, When The Culture War Fell

What does all of this tell us about the political divide of the Star Trek fandom? That it is, on a pretty literal level, completely useless. Not because fans shouldn’t argue about their favorite media; heck, the entire internet was built on trivial fan debates! But Trek is the literal embodiment of its values, and with Infinite Diversity in Infinite Combinations, it can mean (wait for it) infinite things to infinite people. It can be a liberal show, with its emphasis on diversity and socialized everything creating a utopia. And it can be a conservative show, with its emphasis on protecting that utopia through military might and strong leadership.

Will this keep people from arguing about politics in Star Trek when they hop online? Probably not. But maybe it will soften the discourse a bit when both sides learn that their favorite franchise isn’t simply one thing. Trek is bigger than all of us, and its values are correspondingly complex. That’s a good thing, of course: we can always come back to our favorite shows and movies to uncover new meaning. If all you’re watching Trek for is to find something to scream about on the internet, though, you need to take William Shatner’s controversial Saturday Night Live advice to heart and do one thing right away: get a life!

Victoria “BroRilla” Woods is sharing some words and goin’ OFF after Tommie Lee reacted to her rockin’ a 30-inch wig.

RELATED: Big Mama, Please! Victoria “BroRilla” Woods Seemingly Shades Latto’s Retirement Announcement (VIDEO)

Victoria “BroRilla” Woods Rocks A 30-Inch Wig

Last week, BroRilla shared a joint reel showing herself picking up and rocking a 30-inch glueless wig.

“Brorilla came by and picked up the infamous 30 inch Kim-K Glue-less Unit and broooooooo doesn’t she look stunning #memphisgirlies #901 #901memphis,” the reel was captioned.

Apparently, BroRilla found time to install the unit and took to Instagram on the evening of Tuesday, May 19, to show off the results. Bro shared a carousel of photos showing her rocking the 30-inch wig, many of which appeared to be taken while she was sitting on a kitchen counter.

Check out the photos below.

Tommie Lee Reacts To Her Rockin’ A 30-Inch Wig Alongside Social Media Users

Reactions rolled in via The Shade Room’s comment section. Many came from social media users.

However, Tommie Lee also shared a few words:

“This gettin weird!”

BroRilla Goes OFF On Tommie Lee

BroRilla peeped Tommie Lee’s comment and returned to Instagram to share a clip. In the clip, she called Lee “old” and “ugly.” Then, she appeared to share words about Lee’s time on reality TV and her apparent tussles.

Watch the NSFW clip here.

From there, BroRilla shared a screenshot of her researching Lee’s age.

Then, she followed up by sharing a photo of Lee and speaking about her appearance.

RELATED: BroRilla FrFr! Victoria Woods’ New Hair Has Fans Saying She Looks Like An Early-Career GloRilla (VIDEO)

The high-stress world of the fashion industry, and the people who work within it, often makes for great entertainment or the perfect backdrop for film. 2026 has already seen the modern state of fashion journalism explored in the absolutely groundbreaking return of Runway and its staff in The Devil Wears Prada 2, as Andy Sachs (Anne Hathaway) and Miranda Priestly (Meryl Streep) fight to secure their place in an industry that has moved on from print magazines. This week, Boots Riley explores another angle with I Love Boosters, following Keke Palmer and her group of shoplifters as they target the high-powered fashion maven who stole their designs. However, one of the most dramatic and emotional explorations of the people who try to live in this world is yet to come next month.

Following its premiere at the Toronto International Film Festival last year, Vertical is gearing up to release the drama Couture in theaters on June 26 in the U.S. Directed by César Award-winning director Alice Winocour, the film stars Oscar winner Angelina Jolie as an American filmmaker named Maxine as she heads to Paris to cover one of the world’s premier designer presentations — Fashion Week. Amid the hustle and bustle, her path intertwines with those of other women of varying ages and cultural backgrounds trying to carve out their own destinies within this cutthroat industry, all while she falls into a personal story of love and self-discovery that forces her to reflect on the choices that got her here. With one month left until release, a new trailer has arrived to tease the emotional twists Maxine’s journey is about to take in her trip to the City of Love.

Maxine’s whole purpose at Fashion Week is to direct the video that will kick off the event, capturing the styles, hopes, and dreams that will flourish under the Paris lights. As the trailer shows, though, she doesn’t think that highly of fashion and sees it more as a lucrative opportunity at a time when she could use the money. Her journey takes an unexpected turn, however, when she’s given a serious medical diagnosis that makes her contemplate her future, her family, and whether her choices have somehow caused all this. Navigating the world in tandem with her is a young pharmacy student named Ada (Anyier Anei), who was discovered as a model in Nairobi and given the opportunity of a lifetime, though she struggles with the pressures the industry places on her and the ridicule she feels from her colleagues. Finally, there’s Angèle (Ella Rumpf), a veteran makeup artist turning her years of experience into a work of fiction that nobody seems to quite understand. Together, they navigate a world of elegance, full of constant choices, small and life-changing.

Who Else Is Involved in ‘Couture’?

Winocour both wrote and directed Couture, with Jolie helping to produce alongside Charles Gillibert, Zhang Xin, and William Horberg. The French production also features Louis Garrel, Garance Marillier, and Vincent Lindon among its cast. The film was a return for Winocour to TIFF after debuting her previous effort, Paris Memories, at the festival back in 2022. Critics weren’t entirely sold on her deep-cutting, high-fashion-exposing new project, however, despite all the award-worthy talent involved. It currently owns a 59% score on Rotten Tomatoes, but Jolie’s emotionally complex performance as Maxine did earn high praise across the board for helping to ground the story.

Couture hits the runway on June 26. Check out the trailer in the player above.

Advertisement

Advertisement

Release Date

June 26, 2026

Runtime

106 minutes

Advertisement

Director

Alice Winocour

Advertisement

Writers

Alice Winocour

Producers

Advertisement

Charles Gillibert, William Horberg

Advertisement

• 
• 
• 
• 

  Sean Gullette

  Ray (voice)

  Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

As much as we love neutral tones, summer is really all about incorporating pops of color into our wardrobes. We recently spotted a pair of beaded slide sandals at Walmart that reminded us of a signature designer look, and the four designs are that dose of fun our outfits are missing. Better yet, the slip-on style costs just $25, but the quality tells a much different story.

Leave it to Walmart to wow us with its lively footwear. The No Boundaries Beaded Slide Sandals are a flat option that allows you to slip your foot right in (because who has time to fuss with straps?). They give serious Euro summer vibes without the need to book a plane ticket.

Get the No Boundaries Beaded Slide Sandals for $25 at Walmart!

Related: Walmart’s Spring Shoe Edit Is Filled With Trendy Finds From $12

I recently received a compliment on a new pair of shoes, and when I replied, “Thanks, they’re from Walmart!” the person could barely believe me. Walmart has leveled up its fashion game recently, and its footwear options are incredibly stylish at an affordable price. The retailer just dropped their spring shoe edit, which includes hundreds […]

Advertisement

The No Boundaries sandals come in four designs: pink and white stripes with a lemon, blue and white stripes with a lobster, green and white stripes with cherries and dark blue with pink, yellow and white fishes and detailing. Do they remind anyone else of a particular designer beaded bag. . . ?

Available in sizes 6 to 11, these sandals have memory foam insoles for all-day wear. So, they look good and feel good. This is a Walmart-exclusive offering, but you could fool someone into thinking you bought this pick at a high-end department store.

Walmart shoppers agree that these beaded slide sandals are vibrant and high quality. They’re comfortable, too, so they don’t just look pretty.

“I 100% recommend these shoes. The lobster beading looks extremely expensive and well-made,” one verified purchaser said. “I wear a size 10, and they fit perfectly. They have a great cushion and they don’t rub or hurt my feet when I walk in them.”

“I received the sandals, and they are much better quality than I expected,” shared another five-star reviewer. “They’re made well, and the colors are vibrant. The sandals have some padding on the footbed.”

Summer should be fun and colorful — after all, we got through many gray winter days and deserve bold hues. The fact that these sandals are even better than what they look like on the website is just the icing on the cake.

Get the No Boundaries Beaded Slide Sandals for $25 at Walmart!

Advertisement

Related: These Rich‑Girl Sandals and Flats Look Designer, But They’re Under $35

The number of shoe sales happening right now is astounding, but the best value isn’t even coming from a sale. Walmart has a true treasure trove of rich‑girl sandals and quiet luxury flats that look expensive and feel expensive, but absolutely aren’t. We’re talking about spring footwear that could easily pass for The Row, Chloé […]

‘Euphoria’ fans are convinced Zendaya’s character, Rue, may be headed for tragedy after the latest episode of Season 3 left viewers in a state of panic.

The hit HBO series has sparked backlash throughout the season, particularly over the provocative storyline involving Sydney Sweeney’s character, Cassie, and her controversial move into the adult content industry.

The turn of events involving Zendaya’s character in the latest episode of “Euphoria” Season 3 has left fans convinced that she may not make it to the end unscathed.

In the episode, which aired Sunday, May 17, Rue returns despite the shocking reveal in the previous installment that her body had been buried. However, her comeback was far from peaceful, as she quickly found herself in danger again and narrowly escaped death twice.

At one point, her boss, Alamo, charged toward her on horseback at full speed while holding a polo mallet, seemingly intent on hurting her. However, as he closed in and terrified her, Rue revealed that she had information about the people behind the hit on his strip club safe, per The Mirror.

She then agreed to cooperate and help him recover his stolen goods, prompting her to contact her former coworker and drug mule, Faye.

Rue Survives Another Brush With Death

From then on, Rue mostly sat out her boss’s negotiations with her former boss, Laurie, while continuing to speak with the cops in a bid to avoid jail time.

In an emotional scene, Rue appeared to spiral as she reflected on her life choices, making separate visits to a church and to her ex-girlfriend, Jules, portrayed by Hunter Schafer. During her visit with Jules, Rue even suggested that they start a family together.

At the church, Rue had a moment of sober reflection before finally receiving a call from her mother. She then tearfully admitted, “I just want to be free to start over.”

As the episode drew to a close, Rue was seen driving while listening to the Bible. However, her media player began to glitch, prompting her to look down and adjust it, completely unaware of an oncoming truck.

Just before a possible head-on collision, Rue snapped back to attention and swerved into a ditch. As she climbed out, a nearby tree caught fire, seemingly leading her to believe that a divine hand had saved her.

Fans Fear Zendaya’s ‘Euphoria’ Arc Is Nearing A Tragic End

Following the emotional scenes, many fans appeared unconvinced that Rue would survive the Season 3 finale and took to social media to share their fears after the episode aired.

Several viewers suggested that Rue’s troubles had become overwhelming, while others questioned whether the character’s increasingly emotional scenes were setting up a devastating final arc.

On X, one fan wrote that they “can’t believe next week is the last time we see Rue alive,” while another added, “Tentative RIP Rue. I relate to her the most.”

Another viewer claimed they had believed since Season 1 that Rue’s story was always headed toward a tragic ending, while others speculated that the character’s latest near-death experience may have been hinting at something darker to come.

Sydney Sweeney’s Cassie Storyline Divides Fans

So far, fans have repeatedly bashed the current season of “Euphoria” over its risqué and nude scenes, particularly those involving Sweeney’s character, Cassie. Some viewers have even gone so far as to call for the show to be pulled.

In the first two seasons, Cassie was portrayed as a sweet, deeply insecure, and hyper-feminine teenager desperate for male validation to fill the void left by her father. However, in the current season, she comes across as a more unhinged and money-obsessed version of her Season 2 self.

Following a five-year time jump, Cassie is now married to Nate Jacobs, played by Jacob Elordi, and living in a suburban mansion. However, her desperation to contribute financially leads her to begin posting provocative content on OnlyFans.

The storyline has only grown more controversial as Cassie takes on increasingly bizarre requests from subscribers, including dressing up in infantilized outfits, selling personal items, and carrying out other disturbing paid demands.

Sam Levinson Defends Cassie’s Controversial Arc

However, show creator Sam Levinson has addressed the uproar surrounding Sweeney’s storyline, saying the nature of the scenes was intentionally absurd.

In an interview with The Hollywood Reporter, Levinson explained that Cassie’s outfits, including the moments where she dresses as a baby and a dog, were meant to add humor to the scenes, which were filmed from the housekeeper’s point of view.

“[Cassie] has got her dog house and her little dog ears and the nose, and that has its own humor, but what makes the scene is the fact that her housekeeper is the one filming it,” Levinson said. “What we wanted to always find is the other layer of absurdity that we’re able to tie into it so that we’re not too inside of her fantasy or illusion… the gag is to jump out, to break the wall.”

In another interview with The New York Times, he stated that the controversial plot was made to highlight the “combination of her desperation and need for validation,” but with a humorous undertone.

Tom Hanks is known for many things, such as his Oscar-winning performances in “Philadelphia” and “Forrest Gump.” However, his role as Sheriff Woody in the “Toy Story” franchise has stayed with the 69-year-old for over 15 years. During a new interview, the esteemed actor spoke about the franchise’s upcoming fifth installment and expressed his gratitude for still being part of the box-office juggernaut all these years later.

Speaking with PEOPLE about “Toy Story 5” on Monday, May 18, in New York City, Hanks gushed about the upcoming sequel. “Oh my Lord, all I can say is the saga continues,” he said.

The original “Toy Story” hit theatres in November 1995, featuring Hanks, Tim Allen, Annie Potts, John Ratzenberger, Don Rickles, Wallace Shawn, and Jim Varney. The film grossed $401.2 million against a $30 million budget.

Over the years, the roster of talented actors has returned for additional films in 1999, 2010, 2019, and will be featured in the latest film, debuting in June 2026.

While Hanks can’t spill the beans about the film just yet, the father of four hinted that fans would be pleased with the final product.

“I have seen it. I don’t know how they do it, but it is a vibrant and proper chapter in the Toy Story canon,” he said. “None of us can believe that we’re still a part of it.”

What Can Fans Expect From Tom Hanks And The Rest Of The ‘Toy Story’ Gang In The Upcoming Film?

The upcoming installment was directed by Andrew Stanton, and at the Disney D23 expo in August 2024, he said that the beloved crew of children’s toys will face an unexpected issue in the new film: technology.

“In Toy Story 5 the toys’ jobs get exponentially harder when our toy crew goes head to head with what kids are obsessed with today: electronics,” he said.

According to the movie’s synopsis, Woody, Buzz Lightyear, Jessie, and the others will work to overcome obstacles when a new tablet, Lilypad, captures Bonnie’s (their owner) attention.

In a separate interview, Allen shared a few behind-the-scenes details about the film, hinting that much of the story would center on Jessie. He also teased an “unbelievable” opening scene as Buzz Lightyear before encouraging fans to go see the film.

“I can give you that, but I can’t give you much more,” he said.

Tom Hanks’ Brother, Jim Hanks, Has Stepped In For Him As Woody In The Past

“Toy Story 5” will hopefully feature more iconic lines from the admired fictional characters, such as Woody’s “There’s a snake in my boot” and “You’re my favorite deputy.”

And speaking of catchphrases, Tom Hanks’ brother, Jim Hanks, previously revealed on the “Love It Film” podcast that he’s actually stepped in for his brother as Woody on numerous occasions.

“The first thing I ever did was one of the pull-string toys from the first movie where he’s saying ‘You’re my favorite deputy’ and ‘There’s a snake in my boot’ and stuff like that,” Jim said. “They had processed the voice so much that they needed a cleaner [version] so I come in and do it.”

Like his brother, Jim also expressed his gratitude to the Pixar team for allowing him to stamp his name in movie history, before noting that while they’re two separate people, he always tries to stay “as true to the character as possible.”

Another Actor Opened Up About His Role In An Iconic Franchise

On the topic of iconic children’s movies, another actor recently opened up about his experience as the lead character in a well-known franchise.

According to a previous report from The Blast, Mike Myers said he almost turned down the role of Shrek in the 2001 film.

Myers explained during a recent interview that he was approached by Jeffrey Katzenberg with an idea at the premiere of “Saving Private Ryan.”

He said that the film executive’s children performed a dance from the “Austin Powers” movie, which took him by surprise.

“This was after such a heavy movie, and I was in tears because my parents were in World War II. I was shell-shocked, and then they’re doing the dance, and I was like, ‘Yeah, that’s great. Read a room!’” he said.

Myers then said that Katzenberg explained his idea of “Shrek” to him, to which he replied, “Well, that’s the worst f–king title I’ve ever heard in my life.”

After some time, though, Myers changed his tune, explaining that he loved how the film “turned fairy tales on its head.”

‘Shrek 5’ Is On Its Way

Like “Toy Story,” a fifth installment in the “Shrek” series is on the way. According to PEOPLE, fans can expect to see the movie in theatres in June 2027, with the return of Myers as Shrek, Eddie Murphy as Donkey, and Cameron Diaz as Fiona. Per reports, Zendaya also joined the cast as Fiona’s daughter, Felicia.